Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
x
x x
8hen as,ed to read the *roblem, all four students either ignored the ord !sim*lify) or used !solved() %ll
students clearly did not ,no hat as e6*ected of them( So that the .5-minute session as not s*ent in idle
chatter, all teams investigated further(
'hree students ere able to e6*lain the meaning of x
2
, hoever, only one student as able to e6*lain 5x( 8e
thought it best to a**roach from a sim*lified version 2x, and the student as ha**y to rite 2x @ x B x. -rom
this the ne6t ste* 5x @ x B x B x B x B x as obtained( %t this stage the idea of multi*lication had not entered
his thoughts( 8e *rom*ted this line of thought by suggesting that, instead of having 5 x#s, he had 5 0#s(
+efore & could say anything the student gave us the anser .5 and he ent on to e6*lain that this as 5 times
0( 8e ent bac, to 5 0#s and suggested this could be ritten as 0 B 0 B 0 B 0 B 0( He agreed and rote .5
and added 0 5 @ .5(
8hen as,ed to tac,le the original *roblem, the student had ritten
5
x
2
5x @ 5x
:2 .;
@ 5x
.
He as obviously trying to remember rules concerning indices( Only one student of the four shoed any
conce*t of factorisation hen it as suggested that x
2
5x may be factorised( &nvestigation came to a halt
due to time constraints although our student had *rogressed to x
2
5x @ x x 5x(
'he one student ho shoed he could factorise rote
5
; 5 :
5
5
2
/
/
/
/
=
x
x x
x
x x
( Cancelling folloed( %lthough
giving the correct anser, the or,ing as illegitimate as x and 5 ere cancelled se*arately(
5uring our conversation, the student commented that he had started studying algebra during 1rimary C(
'herefore the *roblem as being *resented to students ho had started algebra as a mathematics to*ic at
least to years before( 8ords such as !sim*lify) and !evaluate) are not understood( &t is clear that students
have been given rules that they find difficult to a**ly, and this suggests a lac, of understanding( & ould
advocate, no mention of rules until an understanding has been established( 'his gave ay to a short
discussion in our team meeting afterards and a colleague mentioned she ould be unha**y to teach algebra
ithout referring to rules( & leave it to the reader to establish ho much *rogress has been made since the
introduction of algebra to the students involved( Hoever & believe that 1rimary C is far too early to establish
the conce*ts involved in algebra, and the survival tactic of folloing rules is counter-*roductive, from hich
many of our students never recover, hile others ma,e *rogress in s*ite of not establishing the foundations(
&ro'lem 3 0Word &ro'lem1( 4ohn and Mary decided to start a business( 4ohn invested H0C 000 and Mary
invested H22 000( 'hey agreed to share the *rofit in the same ratio as the sums of money they invested( &f the
total *rofit is H25 000, ho much as Mary#s share of the *rofitG
8hen as,ed to read the 7uestion, the only ord that caused *roblems as !invested), to out of four
students used another ord( %ll the students related to the *roblem, and ,ne the ratio sign, although one
said he did not ,no the symbol used for ratio, but then ent ahead and used it(
8hen as,ed to find the anser, three out of four students anted to use their calculators( Our student as
shoing signs of an6iety and as visibly relieved to find that e thought it as a good idea(
%ll the students ere able to ma,e *rogress to 0 / 2 as the ratio they anted to use( One student ent on and
com*leted the 7uestion, but three of the students, hile ,noing that they should consider H25 000,
struggled to ,no hat to do ith the ratio( 'hey all anted to or, ith
2
0
H25 000, but hen it as
*ointed out that this gave an anser greater than H25 000, the students revised their or,ing to
5
2
H25 000
and therefore obtained the anser(
8e felt that this 7uestion had been 7uite ell done, *erha*s since it meant something to the students and as
a real life *roblem, hich they felt comfortable ith it(
,ntervie* on Statistics and 4eometry &ro'lems
Susan -ohnson
SM Sayyidina A'u a$ar
%t a recent seminar for Secondary Mathematics HO5s ithin +runei, held at SM Sayyidina Husain on the
25
th
November, 2000, intervies ere conducted ith students to try and hel* us understand the ay they
thin, and to get an insight into the reasons they use to 9ustify their ansers( 8e used the Neman "rror
%nalysis method for intervieing students, hich investigates a student#s ability to go through the folloing
five ste*s hen solving a *roblem/
reading the 7uestion,
com*rehension of hat the 7uestion is as,ing for and hether they understand certain ords or symbols
ithin the 7uestion,
transformation/ ,noing ho they ill start,
*rocessing s,ills,
C
encoding ability/ riting don a sensible anser(
&ntervies ere conducted ith to teachers tal,ing to one -orm 2 student( "ach intervie loo,ed into the
solving of to mathematical *roblems( -our grou*s covered the same *roblems and then collated their
findings( +elo are the collective findings of our four grou*s(
&ro'lem 2 0Statistics15 'he histogram shos the number of hours some students s*ent doing homeor, on a
*articular day(
:a; Ho many students ere there in this grou*G
:b; -ind the median number of hours the students s*ent on doing homeor,(
+esults of intervie*s
+eading5 %ll four students managed to read the 7uestions easily(
!omprehension5 8hen as,ed about their understanding of the ord !histogram,) all four students ere able
to say that this is a ty*e of gra*h( One mentioned that the bars had to have !no ga*s() Most of the students
had some idea of ho to inter*ret each bar, for e6am*le, that to students did no homeor,, that four
students did one hour, and so on( %ll four students had a fuEEy conce*t of the ord !median,) and ,ne only
that it related to the !middle()
#ransformation5 Students a**eared confident and ,ne hat they anted to do(
&rocessing and encoding5 %ll four students ere able to *rocess the anser to *art :a; correctly, e6*laining
that they needed to add the heights of the bars( One student res*onse as/
Hoever, for *art :b;, only one student as able to or, out the correct median, using the idea of finding the
middle position first( "ven so, her anser as incorrectly encoded because she e7uated *osition and actual
median as the same thing( %lso, she used
2
n
rather than
2
. + n
to identify the median *osition/
'he other three students initially all did similar things by listing the five numbers ritten in *art :a; and
crossing out the outside values to find the middle(
D
0 . 2 0 2
5
2
0
2
.
0
'hey then realised their anser as not sensible :sometimes only hen *rom*ted, !so the middle student
does five hours of homeor,G); and tried again( -or the ne6t attem*t, one student ordered the same five
numbers, and confidently came u* ith a middle value of three, 7uite ha**y that this as the correct anser(
%nother student corrected his results by *resenting a table, the contents of hich ere accurate(
Hoever, he then *roceeded to use only the bottom ro of the table to find the median, failing to include the
number of students in his calculations( So, he arrived at the correct anser, but using the rong reasoning(
One student :only hen guided a little; listed all fifteen students# homeor, amounts individually, and then
located the middle accurately( He ould have been unable to do this unaided(
&ro'lem 3 04eometry15 8hich triangles are similarG See diagram belo( 'he students ere given cut-outs
of the triangles and they could use them, if they ish(
%
+
C
1
K
3
$
M
N
5
"
-
+esults of intervie*
+eading5 Once again, all four students ca*ably read the 7uestions out loud(
!omprehension5 &nitially, all four students described the ord !similar) to mean !the same,) but could not
s*ecify further( 8hen as,ed to describe hat a !triangle) as, the students found it difficult to verbalise an
anser, and one student said that it as a !*yramid()
#ransformation5 'he students found it difficult to e6*lain hat they needed to do to anser this *roblem(
A
&rocessing and encoding5 &nitially, by 9ust loo,ing at the given sha*es, students tended to *ic, out the
rong to triangles( 8hen given cut-outs of the four triangles, they ere more easily able to *ic, out the
to similar triangles accurately( Hoever, fe students could e6*lain *hy the to sha*es they chose ere
similar( Only one student came u* ith the idea of the angles being the same(
&n summary, only su*erficial understanding of medians and similarity ere shon by these four students( &t
seems that students have certain *rocesses learnt, such as crossing out numbers from the outside, until they
reach the middle value, or arranging numbers in order for median, but ithout true understanding of the
conce*ts involved, they use these learnt *rocesses in a ha*haEard ay(
,ntervie* on Alge'ra and (um'er &ro'lems
+ichard -o6efe$
SM &-( &4 .7 A'u a$ar8 Kuala elait
'o students ere each given, se*arately, to *roblems, one based on number or, the other on algebra(
-or both to*ics, the -orm 2 students had the basic mathematical techni7ues to solve the *roblems but they
had not covered the actual to*ic being analyEed(
'he e6ercise as not a test but an analysis of the students# mathematical reasoning( &t as structured to
follo the Neman "rror %nalysis stages(
&ro'lem 2 0(um'er pro'lem15 On a coach tour, the fare for one student is HC, hich is D5N that of an
adult#s fare( Calculate the adult fare(
tu!ent 1. 'his student had no *roblem in reading the 7uestion( He also understood the meaning of the
*roblem although coach tour and fare seemed strange ords or conce*ts to him( Hoever, hen as,ed hat
he understood he e6*lained the it as the same as saying the if his H00 *er month *oc,et money as 5N of
his father#s monthly income, ho much did his father earn in a month( So, the intervie continued and the
student as as,ed to solve the *roblem( His first line read/
C H
.00
D5
@
%t this stage the student did not inter*ret D5N as
2
0
or have the confidence to solve the *roblem manually(
Psing the calculator he correctly *roduced the result of his e6*ression as H2(05(
&t as *leasing to note at this stage that the student ,ne the anser as rong, and hen 7uestioned said
that any correct anser must be greater than HC( +ut he as unable to *roceed any further( 'he intervieer
7uestioned further to find out hy an alternative e6*ression could not be *roduced and the student res*onded
by saying that the e6*ression must involve D5N and HC but he did not ,no in hich ay(
'he intervieer then as,ed the student to solve a very similar *roblem, namely that the student#s fare of HC
as 50N of the adult fare( &mmediately, by mental calculation only, the student said the adult fare as H.2(
8hen as,ed ho he had done this calculation so 7uic,ly he re*lied that .00N, the adult#s fare, as double
the student#s fare( %s,ed to a**ly the same method to the original *roblem, he as unable to *roceed any
further(
tu!ent 2. 'his student had good reading s,ills and understood the 7uestion, in so much, that she a**reciated
that the adult#s fare ould be greater than the student#s fare( She a**reciated that D5N as the same fraction
as
2
0
and the first line of her solution as/ D5N x @ C(
Clearly, this student had been able to move to the abstract conce*t of algebra in order to find a solution(
-urther, she as able to *roduce a correct first-line e6*ression( 'he *ros*ect of a solution seemed good(
Hoever, the student as unable to solve the e7uation she had ritten( 'he intervieer 7uestioned the
student on her understanding of reci*rocals but it brought no further *rogress and, once again, the *roblem
as left unsolved(
?
&ro'lem 3 0Alge'ra pro'lem15 -actoriEe x
2
R 2y
2
tu!ent 1. 'his student read the *roblem as/ !-actoriEe x to minus four y to()
8hen as,ed to e6*lain hat !factoriEe) meant, he re*lied that it meant to !ma,e it longer() 8hen as,ed
hat ty*e of factoriEing he had done *reviously, it as clear that this as limited to finding a common
factor( 8hen as,ed to e6*lain hat a factor as, he said he did not ,no and this as the same res*onse
hen as,ed ! hy do e factoriEe e6*ressionsG) 'he first line of his solution as/
x x 2y y
Nothing rong in his transformation of the *roblem but it as obvious that he did not recogniEe the method
of factoriEing the difference of to s7uares( 'he ne6t line in *rocessing *roduced/
@ x 5y, adding that 2y y @ 2y B y @ 5y(
'he student did not thin, his anser as correct but did not attem*t to chec, his anser or to *rovide an
alternative solution(
tu!ent 2. 'his student, again, easily co*ed ith reading the *roblem and said it as/ !-actoriEe x s7uared
minus four y s7uared()
8hen as,ed to e6*lain the ord !factoriEe,) she found it very difficult and *referred to describe it through
the reverse *rocess of e6*ansion, saying that if to e6*ressions are multi*lied to ma,e a single e6*ression,
then factoriEing ould give those to e6*ressions( 'he first line of her solution as/
@ x:x 2y y;
&t is assumed that this as considered her anser because, in her ne6t line, she did chec, her solution by the
reverse *rocess, e6*ansion, to give/
@ x
2
2y
2
II
!onclusion
%lthough our to students did not *rovide a correct solution to either *roblem, it as very interesting to note
their thought *rocesses( &n the number *roblem, there as an e6*ectation of hat the anser should have
been even though student . said he ould have acce*ted any calculation that *roduced an anser greater
than HC( &t as also interesting to note ho 7uic,ly the *roblem as solved hen D5N as changed to 50N
because he ,ne, through e6*erience, that you had to !double) to get bac, to the !hole)( Student 2, ho
*rovided a correct o*ening to the number *roblem, understood hat a reci*rocal as, in so much, that if you
gave her a number she could give the reci*rocal but as unable to *rovide the arithmetic relationshi*
beteen a number and its reci*rocal( 'he algebraic *roblem *roved too abstract for the studentsJ their
conce*t of factoriEation as limited to a sim*le common factor and its use in mathematics as vague(
.0