Phone: 6516-8187 (please leave message if no one picks up)
Office Hours: By appointment
Office: AS4 #02-31
Teaching Assistant: Wong Shi Hui Sarah
Email: psywshs@nus.edu.sg
Office Hours: By appointment
Office: AS4 #02-07D
Course Goals
Content.
Students taking PL 3238 should acquire knowledge of scientific theory and resear ch in the major topic areas of social cognition. Some examples of major topic areas includ e - person memory - impression formation - stereotypes - automatic and controlled processing - cross-cultural cognition.
Learning skills.
Students should strengthen their abilities to read and discuss empirical researc h and review articles. This involves learning how to - process a large amount of information - integrate existing knowledge - to use existing knowledge to evaluate new information - to apply the principles they have learned for understanding mental processes i n everyday situations
Course Format The lecture will begin with a 5 minute writing exercise (for you to recap the pr evious weeks materials). I will then cover contents on the current weeks topic.
The tutorials will involve more in-depth discussion of some of the assigned read ings as well as group presentations.
Schedule of Course Topics (**subject to change**)
DATE TOPIC READINGS
Week 1
Aug 15
. Introduction to Social Cognition . Categories . Schemas
Fiske & Taylor (2013). Social Cognition: From brains to culture. Chapter 1 Introduction. (pp.1-28). Los Angeles: Sage.
Jordan, C., & Zanna, M.P. (1999). How to read a journal article in social psychology. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.), The self in social psychology (pp. 461-470). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612- 625.
Week 2
Aug 22
. Heuristics I Schwarz, N. et al. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195- 202.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396.
Week 3
Aug 29
. Heuristics II
Tormala, Z.L., Petty, R.E., & Briol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1700-1712.
Blankenship, K.L., Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E. Detweiler-Bedell, Macy, C.L. (2008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1465-1476.
Chapter 4 in this e-book: Kunda, Z. (1999). Social Cognition: Making sense of People. MIT Press: London, England.
Kray, L., George, L., Liljenquist, K., Galinsky, A., Tetlock, P., & Roese, N. (2010). From what might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 106-118.
Week 5
Sep 11
. Memory I Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation in the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361-366.
Lindsay, D., Hagen, L., Read, J., Wade, K., & Garry, M. (2004). True Photographs and False Memories. Psychological Science, 15(3), 149-154. Week 6
Sep 18
. Memory II
Chapter 5 in this e-book: Kunda, Z. (1999). Social Cognition: Making sense of People. MIT Press: London, England.
Week 7
Oct 3
. MIDTERM EXAM
Everything covered from Week 1 to Week 6 in lecture and tutorial.
Note: There is no make-up exam. Please do not enroll in this course if you are unable to attend the mid-term and/or the final exam.
Week 8
Oct 10
. Stereotypes
Maris, S. & Hoorens, V. (2012). The ISI phenomenon: When contradicting one stereotype changes another. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 624- 633.
Wegener, D.T., Clark, J.K., & Petty, R.E. (2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus nonthoughtful stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 90, 42-59.
Week 9
Oct 17
. Automatic Processing I
Hugenberg, K. & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2003). Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640-643.
Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 893 - 910.
Week 10
Oct 24 . Automatic Processing II
Bodenhausen, G. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.
Gilbert, G.T., Krull, D.S., & Pelham, B.W. (1998). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self- regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685-694.
Week 11
Oct 31
. Motivation and Affect Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308-318.
Sawicki, V., Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Bengal, S. T. (2011). Seeking confirmation in times of doubt: Selective exposure and the motivational strength of weak attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 540-546.
Echebarria-Echabe Agustin (2013). Mortality salience and uncertainty effects: Similar effects but different processes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 185-191. Week 12
Nov 7
. Cognitive Consistency
Gawronski, B., Walther, E., & Blank, H. (2005). Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: Cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 618-626.
Maio, G.R., Esses, V.M., & Bell, D.W. (1994). The formation of attitudes toward new immigrant groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1762-1776.
Week 13
Nov 14
. Cross-cultural Cognition
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691 -705.
Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of Easterners and Westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294 310.
Schedule at a Glance
Week/Day Topic
1 Aug 15 Introduction to Social Cognition Categories and Schemas
NOTE: Oct 6 (Week 8, Mon) and Oct 22 (Week 10, Wed) are Hari Raya and Deepavali public
holidays, respectively. There will be no tutorials on these dates for discussion groups E1 and E3. Hence, both groups will have a make-up tutorial (Tutorial 5) during Week 13 at their regular timeslot (i.e., Nov 10 for E1 and Nov 12 for E4). Please take this into consideration when signing up for tutorials.
*Discussion groups D2, D4, and E2 will be dropped in the event that the module i s under- subscribed. Please do not enroll in this course if these are the only tutorial s lots that you can attend.
Week Topic
3/4 Tutorial 1: Welcome/How to Read a Journal Article
A. Jordan, C., & Zanna, M.P. (1999). How to read a journal article in social psy chology. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.), The self in social psychology (pp. 461-470). Philadelp hia: Psychology Press.
B. Blankenship, K.L., Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E. Detweiler-Bedell, Macy, C.L. (2 008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective o n numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1465-1476.
5/6 Tutorial 2: Reconstructing the Past, Experiencing the Future
A. Kray, L. J., George, L. G., Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A. D., Tetlock, P. E., & Roese, N. J. (2010). From what might have been to what must have been: Counterfactual thinking creates meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 106- 118.
B. Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affect ive forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 82, 503-514.
7/8 Tutorial 3: Group presentations** on Stereotypes
A. Sherman, J.W., Conrey, R.R., & Groom, C.J. (2004). Encoding flexibility revis ited: Evidence for enhanced encoding of stereotype-inconsistent information under cognitive load. Social Cognition, 22, 214-232.
B. Lybarger, J.E., & Monteith, M.J. (2011). The effect of Obama saliency on indi vidual- level racial bias: silver bullet or smokescreen? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 642-652.
9/10 Tutorial 4: Group presentations** on Automatic Processing
A. Briol, P., Gasc, M., Petty, R.E., & Horcajo, J. (2013).Treating thoughts as mat erial objects can increase or decrease their impact on evaluation. Psychological Scien ce, 24, 41-47.
B. Macrae, C.N., & Johnston, L. (1998). Help, I need somebody: Automatic action and inaction. Social Cognition, 16, 400-417.
11/12 Tutorial 5: Yin and Yang; Darkness and Light
A. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirk land, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mort ality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308-318.
B. Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic v ersus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691-705.
** Group presentations You will be presenting one experiment from the assigned article of the week. The time for each presentation should be between 15-20 minutes. The contents of the presentation s hould include but not be limited to:
Introduction . What is the research question/ why was this research conducted? . What is the hypothesis?
Method . What is the overall design? . How is the study conducted?
Conclusion . What are the results? . What can we conclude from the results? . What is one real-life application of the finding?
Some tips for a good presentation: . Explain and clarify rather than re-state or paraphrase . Use visual aids (e.g., diagrams, graphs, etc.) where appropriate, and be able to break down and explain the visual aids . Think of ways to let your fellow classmates experience what participants in th e study went through (e.g. via exercises, demonstrations, etc.)
Important: . It is a good idea to rehearse your presentation at least once. Time yourself t o see if you need to make revisions. Any portion of the presentation that occurs after 20 min utes will not be graded. . You will receive 0% for your group presentation if you are absent.
Assessments
Class participation: 10% Group presentation: 20% Midterm exam (Oct 3): 30% (open book; short-answer and essay questions) Final exam (Nov 26, PM): 40% (open book; short-answer and essay questions)
The exams will test your knowledge from everything covered in a.) lectures, b.) all assigned readings, and c.) tutorials.
Class Participation and Attendance
Attendance is not mandatory, but you will learn more from the class if you parti cipate actively. If you miss a lecture or tutorial for any reason, you are responsible for all mater ial covered and any announcements made in your absence. Please note that I will have to report to th e Deans Office if you miss more than two tutorial sessions.
You can earn up to 200 points for class participation and attendance. Below is t he breakdown:
Attendance for every tutorial: 80 points Four standard comments or two excellent comments*: 120 points
*Points for comments can be earned during audience participation in group presen tations and other activities during tutorials.