Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
60
*
ln
D
d
where:
Z
o
characteristic impedance
dielectric constant or relative permittivity of
dielectric to air
D inside electrical diameter of outer conductor
d outside electrical diameter of inner conductor
Attenuation
The attenuation of the line is normally expressed in
terms of loss per unit length or db/100 ft (db/100
meters). The attenuation is due to dielectric losses and
conductor losses. The dielectric material loss is directly
proportional to frequency. For air dielectric lines
where the majority of the volume of space between
the inner and outer conductors is air, the most com-
monly used dielectric materials are TFE and polyethyl-
ene. These materials produce very small losses, and
in the case of rigid coaxial lines, this loss is usually
negligible relative to the conductor losses. Conductor
losses are related to dimensions, permeability and con-
ductivity of the material. The conductor loss varies
with the square root of the frequency and for copper
conductors:
0.433
Z
o
*
1
D
1
d
*
f
where
attenuation constant, db/100 ft
f frequency, MHz
Attenuation is minimized when D/d is equal to 3.59,
which results in an impedance of 77 .
Power Handling
The power handling capabilities of coaxial lines are
based on two factors: the maximum peak power (or
maximum voltage that can be safely present) and the
maximum average power, which is determined by the
allowable temperature rise on the inner conductor.
Peak Power
The maximum electric eld strength between two
coaxial conductors can be calculated from:
E
max
0.278
d
*
P
ln
D
d
where:
E
max
Maximum electrical field strength, volts/in
P Power level of signal, watts
E
max
is at a minimum when the ratio D/d is equal
to 1.65. This results in a characteristic impedance for
an air dielectric line of 30 .
Determining the average power capability of a line
requires extensive testing or the use of complex ther-
mal models. It has been determined that the optimum
ratio of D/d is approximately 2.72, resulting in a char-
acteristic impedance of 60 .
Summary
It can be seen from the previous analysis that there
are tradeoffs between optimum congurations for at-
tenuation, peak power and average power. Broadcast
transmission lines have standardized on 50 and 75 .
The 50 impedance is a balance between optimum
peak power and average power. Typically, if power is
the controlling factor, a 50 line is used. If attenuation
(efciency) is more important, then a 75 line should
be used.
Design Criteria: Operational Parameters
With the characteristic impedances determined, the
choice of line now is based on the desired frequency
of operation (or limited by the cut-off frequency), and
the actual power handling and attenuation ratings.
Cut-off Frequency
The cut-off frequency ( f
c
), is the frequency above
which undesirable modes of propagation can be gener-
ated. The generation of these modes results in degraded
efciency, higher reections (Voltage standing wave
ratioVSWR) and lowered power handling. Since
larger coaxial transmission lines can handle more
power, the ( f
c
) typically is the limiting factor where
frequency of operation versus power handling is deter-
mined. The cut-off frequency is inversely proportional
to the conductor dimensions and is determined by the
following equation:
f
c
(GHz)
7.52
*
(D d)
Differences in the maximum operating frequency of
specic line sizes are sometimes evident when re-
2 4 6
National Assoc. of Broadcasters (NJ) (PS8295) PKF 01-06-99 09:34:51 CH2x4 Page 246
C O A XIA L TR A N SM ISSIO N LIN E S
losses come from both the inner and outer conductor
materials and the material used to support the inner
conductor. In solid dielectric cables, the dielectric loss
can be appreciable and at higher frequencies actually
exceed the conductor losses. For air dielectric lines,
the insulating supports are a small percentage of the
total dielectric space and their losses are generally neg-
ligible.
Attenuation and efciency are directly related. Effi-
ciency is dened as the ratio of power delivered to the
load relative to the power input into the transmis-
sion line:
Efciency Power out/Power in
The efciency is determined by calculating the total
attenuation of the line based on its overall length. The
total attenuation (in db) is then converted to efciency:
Efficiency % 10
(
total
/ 10)
*
100
Actual attenuation can be inuenced by the VSWR
of the line and the operating temperature. Except in
cases of extreme VSWR or temperatures, these effects
are insignicant to the performance of the system.
For VSWR, the loss is increased by the factor
1 VSWR
2
2
*
VSWR
For temperature, the greatest effect is a change in
the temperature of the inner conductor since the con-
ductivity of the material is affected by temperature.
The adjustment factor for attenuation (M
a
) is given by:
M
a
1
o
(T
t
T
o
)
T
t
inner connector temperature C
T
o
inner conductor temperature at standard
rating C
o
temperature coefficient of resistance at
standard rating
For standard temperature rating of 20C,
o
0.00393/C. Then:
M
a
1 0.00393 (T
t
20)
For an inner conductor temperature of 100C, the atten-
uation will increase by a factor of 1.146.
Power Ratings
There are two primary ratings when discussing the
power handling capabilities of coaxial transmission
linesaverage and peak power. The average power
rating is based on the maximum internal heating the
line construction can withstand. This is normally lim-
ited by the maximum safe operating temperature of
the dielectric spacing material. The peak power rating
is based on voltage breakdown characteristics.
Peak Power
Peak power is dened as the maximum RF power
which can be reached in any interval, such as an RF
2 4 7
National Assoc. of Broadcasters (NJ) (PS8295) PKF 01-06-99 09:34:51 CH2x4 Page 247
viewing various manufacturers specications. This is
typically a result of a different safety factor used when
deciding on the actual maximum frequency of opera-
tion. A 510% reduction in the calculated f
c
is a normal
safety factor and will account for manufacturing toler-
ances and the effects of connections and elbows. How-
ever, where numerous elbows assembled back-to-
back will be used within a system, additional safety
factors may be necessary to prevent the generation of
higher order modes.
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio
Typically, it is important that the transfer of energy
from the source (transmitter) to a load (antenna or
receiver) be as efcient as possible. The attenuation
constant is one factor in determining the efciency as
it represents a direct loss of energy. Another factor is
the impedance mismatch between the line and the load.
The greater the mismatch, the higher the reected level
of energy at the connection. This reected energy re-
duces the amount of signal transmitted to the load and
results in lower efciency. The incident and reected
waves will combine to produce an uneven voltage
distribution. Voltage and current maxima and minima
occur resulting in a standing wave along the line. The
VSWR is dened as the ratio of maximum to mini-
mum voltage:
VSWR V
max
/V
min
The effects of VSWR may be signicant depending
on the VSWR level and the specic conditions of
operation. In general, as the VSWRincreases, the max-
imum voltage levels increase and voltage breakdown
may occur. Excessive heating along the line may also
occur due to the current maxima and softening or
melting of the dielectric insulating material may cause
the inner conductor to shift in position.
In a simplied form, the impedance at any point
along a transmission line is described as:
Z(s) Z
o
(1 V
/V
)/(1 V
/V
)
Z(s) resultant impedance at a point on the line
V
o
(Z
L
Z
o
)/(Z
L
Z
o
)
Then
VSWR V
max
/V
min
(1
o
)/(1
o
)
or
o
(VSWR 1)/(VSWR 1)
Attenuation
Attenuation is dened as the loss created by the
imperfect conductivity of the conductors and the im-
perfect insulating dielectric medium. In coaxial lines,
SE C TIO N 2 : B R O A D C A ST TO WE R S A N D SYSTE M S
modulation cycle. Peak refers to the peak amplitude
of modulation and is not the instantaneous power when
the RF voltage is at a maximum. In a continuous CW
carrier such as FM, the peak power equals the average
power. In 100% AM, the power rises to four times the
carrier power at the peaks of the modulation envelope.
So in this case, the peak power is four times the car-
rier power.
The peak power rating is dependent on voltage
breakdown considerations, which are relatively fre-
quency insensitive. Therefore, this rating is constant
with frequency. It is, however, extremely sensitive to
line size, physical conditions, pressure and the dielec-
tric medium. It is important that the rating be based
on a predetermined set of conditions that are clearly
stated. Once a rating is determined for these conditions,
it can be adjusted for other conditions.
The procedure for determining a peak power rating
is to establish a peak voltage the line will withstand
every time under normal manufacturing processes. Be-
cause voltage breakdown levels are extremely sensitive
to effects such as dust, insulator condition and surface
irregularities, the theoretical breakdown gradient can-
not be used in practice. It has become standard proce-
dure to derate the theoretical breakdown to 35% of its
value to determine a production dc test voltage. This
test voltage (E
p
) is calculated using the following equa-
tion which is derived fromthe maximumvoltage gradi-
ent in a coaxial line and includes the derating of 35%:
E
p
3.17
*
10
4
(d)
log
D
d
*
1
0.273
d
where
E
p
production test voltage
d inner conductor OD, in.
D outer conductor ID, in.
air density factor 3.92B/T
B absolute pressure, cm of mercury
T temperature, K
( 1 for B 76 cm and T 23C 296K)
Rounded off values for E
p
for 50 transmission
lines are:
E
p
Nominal Line OD
DC Volts inches
6,000 7/8
11,000 1-5/8
13,000 2-1/4
16,000 3
19,000 3-1/8
21,000 4
27,500 5
35,000 6-1/8
The production test voltage must now be converted
to realistic RF rms operating voltage, E
rf
:
E
rf
0.7
*
E
p *
1
2
*
SF
E
r f
maximum RF rms operating voltage with no
derating for VSWR or modulation, but includes a
safety factor
1/2 RMS Factor
0.7 DC to RF factor
SF safety factor for voltage (typically 1.4 or 2)
This voltage then determines the peak power rat-
ing, P
pk
:
P
pk
(E
rf
)
2
/Z
o
watts
or
P
pk
E
p *
0.707
*
0.7
SF
2
Z
o
An adequate safety factor on peak power is neces-
sary to safeguard against voltage breakdown which
can result in permanent damage to the line. Many
manufacturers have settled on a power safety factor
of 2 which is equivalent to a voltage safety factor
(SF) of 1.4. When good conditions for installation or
operation can not be maintained, it is good practice to
apply a higher safety factor to prevent damage on
initial startup of a system.
Once the peak power is determined, it must be fur-
ther derated for the effects of modulation and VSWR.
These deratings are calculated as follows:
AM:
P
max
P
pk
(1 M)
2
*
VSWR
FM:
P
max
P
pk
VSWR
TV:
P
max
P
pk
(1 AU 2AU)
*
VSWR
P
max
derated maximum power
M Amplitude modulation index (100% 1)
AU Aural to visual ratio (20% aural: AU 0.2)
Much of the technical literature written on this topic
discusses methods to increase the peak power rating
through the use of increased pressure and high dielec-
tric strength gases. While in theory a higher rating is
possible, the system requires signicant monitoring to
prevent extensive damage due to breakdown if a failure
in the pressurization integrity occurs. The decision to
utilize these procedures requires extensive analysis of
the proposed system and should not be used if other
more stable congurations are available.
2 4 8
National Assoc. of Broadcasters (NJ) (PS8295) PKF 01-06-99 09:34:51 CH2x4 Page 248
C O A XIA L TR A N SM ISSIO N LIN E S
tion schemes, the average power can be calculated
from:
AM P
avg
P
c
1
M
2
2
FM P
avg
P
T
TV P
avg
(0.6 AU) P
TV
P
avg
average transmitter power
P
c
carrier power
Mamplitude modulation index
P
T
FM transmitter power
P
TV
TV peak sync power
AU Aural to visual ratio
As with peak power, the average power rating must
also be adjusted for actual operating conditions. Since
average power is based on ambient temperature, it
must be adjusted for the actual operating ambient tem-
perature. (Use Figure 2.4-2 to nd the appropriate
adjustment factor.)
Average power should also be derated for VSWR.
The derating factor (DF) is calculated fromthe formula
below where F
1
is a factor that varies with frequency
and line size. Select the F
1
factor from Figure 2.4-3,
calculate the DF and then divide the average power
rating by the DF.
DF
VSWR
2
1
2
*
VSWR
F
1
*
(VSWR
2
1)
2
*
VSWR
Increases in average power ratings can also be theo-
retically accomplished in a similar fashion as peak
powers. The same cautions apply for average power
as did for peak power.
Velocity of Propagation
A nal performance characteristic that has primary
importance when attempting to match the phases be-
Average Power
The average power rating is limited by the amount
of heat created due to line losses. The amount of heat
allowable is primarily determined by the safe, long
term performance of the dielectric material used. Since
the loss and temperature rise of the inner conductor
are greater than the outer conductor, the maximum
allowable temperature of the inner conductor is nor-
mally used to determine the average power rating.
For typical conditions, the inner conductor is al-
lowed to reach a temperature of 100Cwith an ambient
temperature of 40C. This means the inner conductor
temperature is allowed to rise 60C above the ambient.
Based on this standard condition, the average power
can be calculated from the following:
P
avg
16,380
*
*
D
M
*
watts
where
P
avg
average power rating for 60C rise of inner
conductor temperature
D outer conductor OD, in.
heat emissivity coefficient of outer conductor,
watts/in
2
M correction factor for attenuation (relative
to 20C)
attenuation constant, db/100 ft at 20C
It should be noted that the heat emissivity coefcient
is derived from experimental data and there are no
industry standards as to its value for various line sizes.
Therefore, it is possible to have noticeable differences
between published ratings due to slight differences
in this factor. For example, a difference of only one
hundredth of a watt/in
2
can result in a 10% difference
in the average power rating.
Typical heat emissivity values for 50 ohm rigid
transmission lines:
7/8 0.120 watts/in
2
3-1/8 0.107 watts/in
2
4-1/16 0.104 watts/in
2
6-1/8 0.097 watts/in
2
The average power is also frequency sensitive since
the attenuation constant () is frequency dependent.
At higher frequencies, the attenuation is greater, there-
fore the average power rating will be reduced.
If average power is the most signicant factor in
choosing a transmission line, it is suggested to review
data sheets from several manufacturers and discuss
any differences in average power ratings. Other factors
that should be reviewed are ange connection types,
inner connector design and method of thermal compen-
sation for the inner conductor. In this way, all factors
that may affect the long term performance of the trans-
mission line are addressed and a sound engineering
decision can be made.
For broadcasting, the average power is dependent
on the nominal CW power of the transmitter and the
type of modulation. For the primary broadcast modula-
2 4 9
National Assoc. of Broadcasters (NJ) (PS8295) PKF 01-06-99 09:34:51 CH2x4 Page 249
Figure 2.4-2. Variation of average power rating with ambient tem-
perature.
SE C TIO N 2 : B R O A D C A ST TO WE R S A N D SYSTE M S
tween two or more lines is the velocity of propagation
or phase velocity (V
p
). It is expressed as a fraction of
the speed of light in a vacuum and is determined by
the dielectric constant of the insulating material:
V
p