Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "[redacted] >
Date: August 19, 2014 at 15:06:05 PDT
To: "'Adam Basford'" <redacted>>
Subject: RE: Update
I wasnt given a deadline for the offer.

Ill work on a change of venue and obtain as much information as I can. As you mentioned
earlier, and I spoke with another attorney about change of venue, it will be difficult to get but
that doesnt mean we cant try. The worst they can do is deny the change of venue motion. Ill
call you when I have video if you would like to watch it. Also, I think you have time to consult
with a civil attorney.

If I have any additional updates I will let you know.

[contact info redacted]

[Disclaimer noted; I have permission from the recipient to share this information]
This email is intended to be read by the addressee named above. It may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of this
transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents or other use is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we may make
the appropriate corrections to our address list. Thank you for your cooperation.


From: Adam Basford [[redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:31 PM
To:[redacted]
Subject: Re: Update

I was advised to file the motion for a change of venue first. Citing my working relationship of 3
years with Judge Woodard, Judge Owell and acting as a police officer under Seitz tenure at the
City Prosecutors office.

I want all that tape first. How long do we have to consider this option? Do I have time to consult
with a civil attorney regarding the law suit against the city for violating the initial agreement?

My issue with making a deal with the city is that they don't keep their deals. This is a false
charge, so what are the chances they'll charge me with another one before the ink drys just like
they did with my "amicable separation" agreement?

-Adam

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:34, "[redacted] wrote:
The offer is a 12 month Stipulated Order of Continuance (SOC), 20 hours community service,
and you either stipulate to the accuracy of the reports or you sign a waiver agreeing not to sue the
city. An SOC is a contract between you and the city. At the end of the SOC and after you have
completed the community service hours the charge will be dismissed. If you obtain a new
criminal charge the SOC can potentially be revoked. If the SOC is revoked then you will have a
stipulated trial. A stipulated trial is when the judge reads the police reports and makes a
determination. A stipulated trial would most likely result in a conviction. I did not ask for a
deferred because you would have to admit guilt.

Seitz is concerned you will sue. I think you should run this by Brusic in regards to suing the city.
I am not a civil attorney and dont feel comfortable giving you any advice regarding a civil suit.
Otherwise an SOC isnt a bad offer and rather typical with your limited criminal history.

While you consider the offer I still plan on continuing to obtain information and research all
potential issues. Let me know if you have any questions.

This email is intended to be read by the addressee named above. It may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of this
transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents or other use is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we may make
the appropriate corrections to our address list. Thank you for your cooperation.