0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
16 vizualizări1 pagină
Richard Lewis is a world traveler and linguist who has categorized cultures into three predominant types - Linear-active, Multi-active, and Reactive - based on their experiences of time and relationships. Linear-actives, like Germans and Swiss, see time as a resource and prioritize schedules. Multi-actives, including Latin Americans and Arabs, are comfortable with multiple tasks and prioritize relationships over punctuality. Reactives, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Finns, value courtesy, respect, and social harmony over confrontation. Lewis also notes that some cultures blend types, like Canadians combining Reactive and Linear-active traits, and Indians fusing Multi-active and Reactive characteristics.
Richard Lewis is a world traveler and linguist who has categorized cultures into three predominant types - Linear-active, Multi-active, and Reactive - based on their experiences of time and relationships. Linear-actives, like Germans and Swiss, see time as a resource and prioritize schedules. Multi-actives, including Latin Americans and Arabs, are comfortable with multiple tasks and prioritize relationships over punctuality. Reactives, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Finns, value courtesy, respect, and social harmony over confrontation. Lewis also notes that some cultures blend types, like Canadians combining Reactive and Linear-active traits, and Indians fusing Multi-active and Reactive characteristics.
Richard Lewis is a world traveler and linguist who has categorized cultures into three predominant types - Linear-active, Multi-active, and Reactive - based on their experiences of time and relationships. Linear-actives, like Germans and Swiss, see time as a resource and prioritize schedules. Multi-actives, including Latin Americans and Arabs, are comfortable with multiple tasks and prioritize relationships over punctuality. Reactives, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Finns, value courtesy, respect, and social harmony over confrontation. Lewis also notes that some cultures blend types, like Canadians combining Reactive and Linear-active traits, and Indians fusing Multi-active and Reactive characteristics.
Meet Richard Lewis. A world traveler and linguist who speaks 10 different languages, Richard is highly experienced in interacting with people from many different cultures. In 1996, he first published a book called When Cultures Collide. Now, in that book he presents a model of 3 different predominant cultural types into which people from various countries can be placed. The first cultural type is called Linear-active. These are people who experience time as being something very real and linear. These people would agree with the idiom Time is money, and therefore time is something that can be saved, spent, wasted, and invested. Linear-actives like to plan, schedule, organize, and do one thing at a time. These are punctual people, who are cool, direct, and decisive. Their body language is often restrained. The Germans and the Swiss would be examples of Linear-actives. The second cultural type is called Multi-active. Unlike Linear-actives, these are people who are comfortable doing many things at one time. They are very talkative and they place importance on relationships. In fact, they often plan their priorities according to the happiness or importance that each appointment gives them rather than a time schedule. Multi-actives are much more flexible and not so punctual when it comes to keeping appointments. They are often emotional and warm people with unrestrained body language. Latin Americans, Arabs, and Southern Europeans fall into this category. The third cultural type is called Reactive. Reactives are people who place a great priority on courtesy and respect. Reactives are very good listeners and are rarely confrontational. In this sense, they value social harmony and are often group oriented. They react carefully to situations and see statements as promises. Face-to-face contact is important, while body language is subtle. The Chinese, Japanese, and Finns are examples of Reactive cultures. What I find interesting is the way that Lewis has categorized certain countries as being a mixture of two types. For example, Canada falls in the middle of Reactive and Linear-active, implying that Canadians are better listeners and somewhat less confrontational than Americans, who are much more Linear-active. Likewise, India is a mixture of Multi-active and Reactive, implying that Indians are much more emotional and talkative than many of their Asian counterparts, such as the Chinese, Thai, Koreans, and Malaysians. Where does your country fall on Lewis map? Do you agree with Lewis categories? How can this knowledge be useful when interacting with people from different places in the world? Let us know what you think. L I S T E N I N G