0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
7 vizualizări7 pagini
This report covers the conservation status, threats to each species, and captive breeding of two species of skink; the Otago skink (Oligosoma otagense) and the Lancelin Island skink (Ctenotus lancelini). The Otago skink is endemic to the South Island of New Zealand, while the Lancelin Island skink is endemic to Western Australia. These species share some similar attributes which allows comparison between their respective captive breeding programs.
Both Otago skinks and Lancelin Island skinks occupy rocky habitat punctuated by either grassland or scrubland. Both of these species face risks involving g habitat changea change in habitat, most notably an increase of exotic flora, which reduces the habitat of these species and likely effects their ecology in other ways (such as an alteration of food availability). Exotic grassland is thought to be responsible for reduced dispersal ability in Otago skinks (Berry et al., 2005), and may also be a factor for Lancelin Island skinks.
Although the reproductive biology of the two species is quite different both species breed very well in captivity, provided their basic needs are met.
However, there are differences between the two species, one of which is their biogeographic history. While the Otago skink was once widespread, the Lancelin Island skink has always been limited to a single population. The Otago skink is in decline, while the Lancelin Island skink is stable, but vulnerable. These differences are evident in the recovery plans for each species.
Titlu original
The principles of captive breeding as it applies to the Otago skink (New Zealand) and the Lancelin Island skink (Western Australia)
This report covers the conservation status, threats to each species, and captive breeding of two species of skink; the Otago skink (Oligosoma otagense) and the Lancelin Island skink (Ctenotus lancelini). The Otago skink is endemic to the South Island of New Zealand, while the Lancelin Island skink is endemic to Western Australia. These species share some similar attributes which allows comparison between their respective captive breeding programs.
Both Otago skinks and Lancelin Island skinks occupy rocky habitat punctuated by either grassland or scrubland. Both of these species face risks involving g habitat changea change in habitat, most notably an increase of exotic flora, which reduces the habitat of these species and likely effects their ecology in other ways (such as an alteration of food availability). Exotic grassland is thought to be responsible for reduced dispersal ability in Otago skinks (Berry et al., 2005), and may also be a factor for Lancelin Island skinks.
Although the reproductive biology of the two species is quite different both species breed very well in captivity, provided their basic needs are met.
However, there are differences between the two species, one of which is their biogeographic history. While the Otago skink was once widespread, the Lancelin Island skink has always been limited to a single population. The Otago skink is in decline, while the Lancelin Island skink is stable, but vulnerable. These differences are evident in the recovery plans for each species.
This report covers the conservation status, threats to each species, and captive breeding of two species of skink; the Otago skink (Oligosoma otagense) and the Lancelin Island skink (Ctenotus lancelini). The Otago skink is endemic to the South Island of New Zealand, while the Lancelin Island skink is endemic to Western Australia. These species share some similar attributes which allows comparison between their respective captive breeding programs.
Both Otago skinks and Lancelin Island skinks occupy rocky habitat punctuated by either grassland or scrubland. Both of these species face risks involving g habitat changea change in habitat, most notably an increase of exotic flora, which reduces the habitat of these species and likely effects their ecology in other ways (such as an alteration of food availability). Exotic grassland is thought to be responsible for reduced dispersal ability in Otago skinks (Berry et al., 2005), and may also be a factor for Lancelin Island skinks.
Although the reproductive biology of the two species is quite different both species breed very well in captivity, provided their basic needs are met.
However, there are differences between the two species, one of which is their biogeographic history. While the Otago skink was once widespread, the Lancelin Island skink has always been limited to a single population. The Otago skink is in decline, while the Lancelin Island skink is stable, but vulnerable. These differences are evident in the recovery plans for each species.