100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
507 vizualizări5 pagini
As a new analyst at an IT support call center. The call center manager has asked to prepare an analysis of 4th quarter call center performance. Before digging into the data, read at least three recent articles on call center metrics.
In the analysis, I have considered performance for important dimensions (e.g., time, customer) based on reading and common sense. Also, develop a list of important metrics for which the call center should be gathering data.
Titlu original
Executive summary of Anlysis of Microsoft Call center performance
As a new analyst at an IT support call center. The call center manager has asked to prepare an analysis of 4th quarter call center performance. Before digging into the data, read at least three recent articles on call center metrics.
In the analysis, I have considered performance for important dimensions (e.g., time, customer) based on reading and common sense. Also, develop a list of important metrics for which the call center should be gathering data.
As a new analyst at an IT support call center. The call center manager has asked to prepare an analysis of 4th quarter call center performance. Before digging into the data, read at least three recent articles on call center metrics.
In the analysis, I have considered performance for important dimensions (e.g., time, customer) based on reading and common sense. Also, develop a list of important metrics for which the call center should be gathering data.
Case study 1: Call center data analysis Executive Summary
Problem Definition: The call center is having higher On Hold times because of which call center performance is degrading, reducing customer satisfaction and increased call rates for particular applications.
Introduction: The quarter has recorded almost 26,000 calls with a total service time of 310,000 minutes. The database contains information about calls, application names, customer names, issue and service time, the on hold time of customer and the level of Staff who attended the call. Different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) have been considered to analyse the data in order to develop the status measures and evaluate the performance of the call center in all. The documents summarize the results of analysis, conclusions and recommendations are made based on it. In summary, it can be said that if the performance on servicing the calls to provide fast and easy problem solutions, is improved substantially, there would be no more calls spent on hold.
Expected Outcomes: Improving performance of the call center service to customer will reduce the time required to solve an issue. There by increase the customer satisfaction. This also will reduce the total running cost and reducing customer service charge consequently.
Overview: The call center is having performance issues related to the customer service metric On Hold Time which is very high. Following is the analysis about what and where the anomalies lies based on the statistical information collected from the database.
Table 1 Service and On Hold time statistics
AppName Average of ServiceTimeMins Max of ServiceTimeMins Average of OnHoldMins Max of OnHoldMins Access 14.1 201.1 1.0 59.3 Excel 11.6 163.1 1.3 57.0 PowerPoint 11.4 136.7 1.4 52.7 Word 10.7 241.0 2.1 59.8 Grand Total 11.8 241.0 1.5 59.8 [Color Red: Warning indicator]
The table 1 shows the average service time is 11.85 seconds whereas maximum service time is 241.01 seconds. The average On Hold time is 1.55 seconds and 59.79 seconds maximum which is quiet high.
Page 2 of 5
Executive Summary
Even though we get the information about range of the on Hold time, we still do not get information about how often the on hold time is high.
By the following graph, it shows that the average On hold minutes are not evenly distributed because some calls are having significantly long On Hold time than others. By the same graph, it can be seen that the staff level 6 is having on hold time much high than any other staff level regardless of customer, days of week or any other attribute. Though the On Hold minutes vary by day of week, the problem mostly pertains to Staff level 6. The possible reason behind this is the staff at level 6 is not able to handle or their might be related to particular application which level 6 staff is handling.
Graph 1 Days of week and staff level effect on On Hold and Service time
Graph 2 shows that the average on hold time is relatively low for total number of call for Access, it is little higher for Excel and PowerPoint but significantly comparable. For Word, it is very high for Easy level complexities. As the number of calls for Word for Easy level complexities are higher than any other applications and complexities as well, the Sum of On Hold minutes is also greatest (~13,597 minutes). That means per call attended by Service Agent, another call is on hold for average of 2.45 minutes. In conclusion, the applications easy complex issues encouraging more number of calls and taking much human resources to resolve, resulting higher on hold minutes per new call and degrading performance. This can further help us determine where exactly problem lies in performance degradation.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 7 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 10 Average of ServiceTimeMins Average of OnHoldMins Page 3 of 5
Executive Summary
Graph 2 Application and complexity effect on On Hold and number of calls
The information gives good picture of performance of call center. But it would be good idea to measure the Service level. The Service level is X% of calls within Y seconds. We can use this metric to measure our performance related to On Hold time.
Service Level = X% of call within less than Y seconds of OnHold time
So our overall service level, based on the OLAP database, is 98.05% calls falls within 20 seconds of On Hold time
The graph 3 is still good enough, but approximately 2% of calls have large hold times, Which is significantly higher and should be reduced to improve the performance of the call center, their by increase productivity.
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 D i f f i c u l t E a s y M e d i u m D i f f i c u l t E a s y M e d i u m D i f f i c u l t E a s y M e d i u m D i f f i c u l t E a s y M e d i u m Access Excel PowerPoint Word Count of CallID Sum of OnHoldMins Page 4 of 5
Executive Summary
Graph 3 Service level for various Applications and overall
Conclusion: The call center is having long call waiting or simply long On Hold seconds for particular calls (4,066 calls) which are very few but the long hold times are critical to performance measurement matrices. Also it is seen that this hold times are common due to Staff level 6 where their service time is normal but Hold Times are higher than with other staff level. Though the On Hold times are relevant to Days of week, Application (majority with MS Word) and Complexities (Majority with Easy), the Staff Level can be a dominant criteria for further investigation.
Recommendations: To improve the call center performance, we need to more dig into the details of why the On Hold timings are high for Staff level 6 and accordingly we can improve efficiency of handling calls by them. Also looking at the weekly load of calls on the staff level 6, recommendation can be made to add more human resources for same level by either hiring new candidates or promoting lower staff to upper levels. Due to high cost of variable labor, we do not recommend to appoint labor on job basis even though the call load is variable by day of week. The new metrics can be introduced to measure the performance of call center are Service Level, which is mentioned and derived above, and total call abandonment rate which tells the number of customers tried and failed to get help from the call center.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Access Excel PowerPoint Word Overall Calls within 20 sec Calls above 20 secs Page 5 of 5
References
(Call Center KPI Examples, 2013) Klipfolio (2013). KPI example. Call center example. http://www.klipfolio.com/resources/kpi-examples-top-call-center-metrics