Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Kathleen Wiejaczka
My Educational Setting
70 students. These students are bussed in from five surrounding counties with the
diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The educational program at New Campus
monitor the health concerns of students and staff including medication consultation,
development of health care plans, and injury assessment, treatment and prevention. My
staff and assessing the safety, health and welfare of our students in crisis.
The students at New Campus School tend to be very aggressive with emotions
that are unpredictable and volatile. Due to these factors each classroom is comprised of
no more than ten students with a teacher and teacher assistant. In addition usually there
are 1 – 2 students school-wide who are assigned a one-on-one teacher assistant due to
Issues of relevance
The safety of each student and staff is of the utmost importance at any school but
especially at a school like New Campus. Dignity, respect, and the student’s right to an
appropriate education in a least restrictive setting are hallmarks at New Campus School.
To accomplish this goal, behavior intervention techniques are used to help the student
learn appropriate responses to staff, other students, and to follow school rules.
Kutz (2009) through the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) testified
allegations of deaths, abuse, injury, and trauma at residential and school programs related
to restraints of vulnerable students. The GAO reviewed the data from the past 20 years
but they did not evaluate the beneficial effect of using restraints. They found no federal
laws restricting the use of restraints in public or private schools and very divergent laws
at the state level. Hundreds of cases of alleged death and abuse were found in the past 20
years. They also found 10 physical restraint cases where there was a criminal conviction,
Kutz (2009) found that the following themes were common in the restraint cases
a) They mostly involved children with disabilities that often times the
student was not physically aggressive and there was no consent from
parents.
b) The restraint blocked air into the lungs due to physical struggling of
educators.
Kutz (2009) found 19 states have no laws or regulations related to the use of
restraints in schools, 17 states require training before being allowed to restrain students, 7
states place some restriction or restraints but none for seclusion (Michigan), 19 states
require parents to be notified after restraints are used, 8 states prohibit the use of prone
restraints, and 4 states are collecting and reporting data to Michigan Department of
Education (MDE).
The National Disability Rights Network (NDRN) (2009) reported because there is
no mandate to report or collect data, the scope of the problem is unknown. Their findings
show 41% of the schools have no laws, policies or guidelines relative to restraints in
schools, 90% still allow prone restraints, and only 45% require or recommend that
schools notify parents of restraint use. The NDRN favors a ban on the use of restraints in
school.
The NDRN (2009) reported the Protection and Advocacy (P & A) system
established by Congress in the mid 1970’s has helped states establish new policies to
protect children from restraint abuses. The Michigan P & A helped the Michigan
standards will help to eliminate dangerous restraint practice in schools. The committee
that formulated these guidelines recommended drafting them into law but this
recommendation was not instituted. However each school district must have a system of
school wide positive behavior support strategies. These strategies will support
Physical Management 5
conduct.
In addition the NDRN (2009) asserted the government findings from the
Presidents New Freedom Commission on Mental Health states the “use of restraints
cause significant risks for children, including serious injury or death, retraumatization of
students with a history of trauma, loss of dignity, and other psychological harm.” NDRN
reported the 1998 Harvard Center for Risk Analysis estimated deaths due to such
One of the most lethal school practices is restraint according to NDRN (2009).
Sudden fatal cardiac arrhythmias or respiratory arrest can occur through the prone
restraint. In fact they assert prone restraint may predispose a person to suffocation. An
example of a death resulting from restraint in Michigan is a 15-year-old boy with autism
who died in 2003 after being restrained by four public school employees who held him in
the prone position. He became unresponsive after 45 minutes but restraint continued until
he stopped breathing. This was the second child in Michigan who died from restraint
according to NDRN.
The first step in decreasing the incidence of behavior problems is to identify why
the student is engaging in this negative behavior. Ayres & Hedeen (2003) identified four
a) Attention seeking
b) Escape
c) Avoidance
They assert the most effective way to address difficult behaviors is to prevent them from
and/or social environment of the child. They cited teaching new skills to replace the
emphasizes prevention and teaching rather than focusing on how to handle the behavior
once it occurs. PBSP uses a functional assessment to understand the behaviors purpose.
These authors remind us that we must acknowledge that behavior serves a purpose for the
students and is an indication of a learning need. The ultimate goal is to teach new
strategies to the student so they can learn new communication, social, and self-regulating
behaviors.
Physical restraints is defined by the State Board of Education (SBE) Standards for
Emergency Use of Seclusion and Restraint (2006) as involving direct physical contact
that prevents or restricts a student’s movement. Restraint is seen as an opportunity for the
a) Breaking up a fight.
SBE (2006) has determined that certain restrictions exist for physical restraint.
prevention.
The recommendations from SBE Standards (2006) are that the restraint will cease
once the child has regained control of his behavior, usually no longer than 10 minutes. If
the restraint’s duration exceeds 10 minutes, staff is required to obtain additional support
such as a school nurse, behavior specialist, or other expertise, and document the reason
The SBE Standards (2006) state while using restraint staff must:
distress.
e) Collect data regarding the use of restraint and report it to the MDE.
requiring use of emergency restraint staff must conduct a functional behavior assessment
(FBA), which is defined as a systematic process to identify triggers that caused the
Physical Management 8
behavior problem This is done whenever behavior negatively impacts student’s ability to
c) Corporal punishment.
e) Child abuse.
g) Prone position.
I support the use of physical restraints to uphold the care, welfare, safety and
security of our students as a last resort when less restrictive strategies have failed. I do
not feel it is in the student’s best interests to ban physical restraints. How would we
protect a child who is out of control head banging or running out into traffic? We have
managements each year. During the 2008-2009 school year we had 16 incidents of
restraint. Compare this to 23 the previous year and 31 in the 2006-2007 school year.
Physical Management 9
According to Luiselli (2008) research has shown that physical restraint that is planned
prior to the incident can be effective in deceasing problem behavior. He also states
physical restraint should only be used if it decreases and ultimately eliminates the
effects on behavior they may have. He stated this leads to an effective strategy toward
preventive behavior interventions. This is the purpose of the FBA, formulation of the
PBSP, and a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP). These occur on every student at New
Campus School. I support this practice and all of our staff work diligently as a team to
identify these triggers, reasons for the behavior, and changes that need to occur in the
classroom to improve the student’s behavior. In addition Luiselli asserts the more precise
these assessments are, the more likely restraint provoking behavior can be curtailed or
eliminated. Weekly at New Campus School staff meet as a school-wide team to problem-
solve new approaches for resistant negative behaviors in students. This is our
commitment to diminish hands-on with students and try to get inside their mind to
Matson & Boisjoli (2009) cited the Association for the Behavior Analysis and the
National Institute of Health’s support for the physical restraint and that it is unethical not
eminent. However, they reported that the behavior-based strategies are at least partially
effective for most cases of challenging behavior. I agree that BIP’s are a very useful
document that are flexible and fluid with input from many professionals both within our
Physical Management 10
facility and community agencies. The authors contend the goal of the behavior plan is to
build adaptive skills thus decrease the student’s need to resort to aggression. The authors
remind us that these behaviors remain powerful ways for the student to communicate and
provide some form of control in their lives. Therefore it can be very difficult to abolish
these behaviors.
Crisis management training is mandatory for all staff at New Campus School on
an annual basis. The main focus of this training is the prevention of situations that lead to
Campus is explicit that staff will not carry any students and physical management will
only be used when a student is a danger to himself or others. This should only be done as
Intermediate School District (TBAISD) policy book (2007) this intervention will only be
At New Campus School all students have a BIP. There are three levels of BIP’s.
level one BIP focuses on changing challenging behavior through the adjustment of
classroom management procedures. A level two BIP uses proactive and reactive
procedures. The most intense BIP is a level three that has to have approval by the
Behavior Support Committee. The level three BIP may include exclusionary time-out,
Practical Implications
monitor the student’s health and safety. This is in direct alignment with the MDE
guidelines for staff to be sensitive to student health needs. Student may have
students with seizure disorders and asthma heightens the concern that during a restraint
any of these comorbidites may contribute to an unsafe situation. I make judgment calls to
end the physical management, or remove outer clothing to cool a student, or to observe
necessary to keep the student safe from harm. Certainly we weigh our options if the
student is mildly hitting himself versus full hard blows to his body before we engage in
physical restraint.
Our policy at New Campus School has been modified to align with the new state
standards. For instance we have purchased many full size firm mats to shield the students
from harming themselves or staff and also to prevent acting out for attention. We have a
computer software program to document all physical restraints, time-outs and aggressive
episodes. This report is sent home to parents the same day of the episode.
and consult about the child’s health and safety. On occasion if a student’s behavior
cannot be calmed and physical restraints continue past 15 minutes, law enforcement
officers are called to assist. On two occasions EMS was notified and the student was
Physical Management 12
student’s behavior plan formulation. I assist in brainstorming new strategies to assist the
medication side effects and dosing, I contribute to decreasing the incidence of physical
References
Ayres, B. J. & Hedeen, D. L. (2003). Creating positive behavior support plans for
Physical Management 13
& G. Schroth (Eds.), Ensuing Safe School Environments (pp. 89-105). Mahawah,
Kutz, G. D. (2009). Seclusions and restraints. Selected cases of death and abuse at
public and private schools and treatment centers. Testimony before the committee
3148.2008.00477.x
http://www.michigan.gov/ddcouncil
Physical Management 14
National Disability Rights Network. (2009). School is not supposed to hurt: Investigative
from: http://www.ndrn.org/issues/an/rs.htm
State Board of Education (2006). Supporting student behavior: standards for the
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/StandardsforSeclusion_Restraint_247533_7.p
df