2014-09-07 NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978): Robbing Argentina in the US court in Manhattan - fraud of medieval style and proportions - opinion filed with the government of Argentina
0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
113 vizualizări18 pagini
OccupyTLV, September 7 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed with the government of Argentina his opinion regarding the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District court, Southern District of New York. [1]
The judgment in the case is likely to cause the collapse of the Argentinian economy for the scond time in 15 years and cause poverty and misery for millions in Argentina.
Regarding the collapse of the Argentinian economy in 2001, Nobel prize winner Joseph Stieglitz raised the suspicion in his book "Globalization and Its Discontent" that the collapse was the handiwork of Stanley Fischer in his capacity as a senior officer of the International Monetary Fund (later Governor of Bank of Israel, today No 2 in the US Federal Reserve), at the service of US agencies.
The opinion, filed today, in part says:
Joseph Zernik, PhD, herein opines that fraud is being committed on the people and the Republic of Argentina by the US government and its agencies, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, and the US Supreme Court in the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York.
US Judge Thomas Griesa, Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick, and all attorneys, who filed papers in the case, including the law-firm, which filed on behalf of the Republic of Argentina, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP, should be deemed part of the conspiracy to defraud.
Attached to the opinion is a paper, submitted for publication, which provides detailed analysis of the litigation records in the case, and which shows missing Summons, invalid Notice of Assignment for US Judge Thomas Griesa, and denial of public access to the authentication records.
The opinion is also based on other cases of fraud in the same court, which is notorious for fraud in banking matters. The most notable among these cases is SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829), where Judge Jed Rakoff appeared as presiding Judge. The PACER docket in SEC v Bank of America Corporation included no copy of the summons in disregard of US law, as is the case in NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina. The summons in SEC v Bank of America Corporation was eventually discovered through a Freedom of Information request on SEC. As seen here, the summons is unsigned, and fails to bear the seal of the court, i.e., invalid summons. SEC v Bank of America Corporation was a landmark court case, relative to banking supervision under the current financial crisis. It originated in the unlawful taking of $5.8 billions by banking executives. US Judge Jed Rakoff colluded with Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick and attorneys for SEC and Bank of America Corporation and conducted Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York, which ended with no executive being held accountable and none of the ill-gotten funds returned by the offending executives.
The paper concludes that conduct of the US courts over the past decade should be deemed organized state-corporate crime and an unannounced regime change in the United States. It is also central to abuse of the people of the United States and failing banking regulation. In the case of NML v Republic of Argentina the US courts reach beyond the territorial US, to rob the people of Argentina through fraud of medieval style and proportions.
Copies of the opinion were filed with the governments of the German Federal Republic, the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
OccupyTLV, September 7 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed with the government of Argentina his opinion regarding the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District court, Southern District of New York. [1]
The judgment in the case is likely to cause the collapse of the Argentinian economy for the scond time in 15 years and cause poverty and misery for millions in Argentina.
Regarding the collapse of the Argentinian economy in 2001, Nobel prize winner Joseph Stieglitz raised the suspicion in his book "Globalization and Its Discontent" that the collapse was the handiwork of Stanley Fischer in his capacity as a senior officer of the International Monetary Fund (later Governor of Bank of Israel, today No 2 in the US Federal Reserve), at the service of US agencies.
The opinion, filed today, in part says:
Joseph Zernik, PhD, herein opines that fraud is being committed on the people and the Republic of Argentina by the US government and its agencies, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, and the US Supreme Court in the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York.
US Judge Thomas Griesa, Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick, and all attorneys, who filed papers in the case, including the law-firm, which filed on behalf of the Republic of Argentina, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP, should be deemed part of the conspiracy to defraud.
Attached to the opinion is a paper, submitted for publication, which provides detailed analysis of the litigation records in the case, and which shows missing Summons, invalid Notice of Assignment for US Judge Thomas Griesa, and denial of public access to the authentication records.
The opinion is also based on other cases of fraud in the same court, which is notorious for fraud in banking matters. The most notable among these cases is SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829), where Judge Jed Rakoff appeared as presiding Judge. The PACER docket in SEC v Bank of America Corporation included no copy of the summons in disregard of US law, as is the case in NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina. The summons in SEC v Bank of America Corporation was eventually discovered through a Freedom of Information request on SEC. As seen here, the summons is unsigned, and fails to bear the seal of the court, i.e., invalid summons. SEC v Bank of America Corporation was a landmark court case, relative to banking supervision under the current financial crisis. It originated in the unlawful taking of $5.8 billions by banking executives. US Judge Jed Rakoff colluded with Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick and attorneys for SEC and Bank of America Corporation and conducted Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York, which ended with no executive being held accountable and none of the ill-gotten funds returned by the offending executives.
The paper concludes that conduct of the US courts over the past decade should be deemed organized state-corporate crime and an unannounced regime change in the United States. It is also central to abuse of the people of the United States and failing banking regulation. In the case of NML v Republic of Argentina the US courts reach beyond the territorial US, to rob the people of Argentina through fraud of medieval style and proportions.
Copies of the opinion were filed with the governments of the German Federal Republic, the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
113 vizualizări18 pagini
2014-09-07 NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978): Robbing Argentina in the US court in Manhattan - fraud of medieval style and proportions - opinion filed with the government of Argentina
OccupyTLV, September 7 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed with the government of Argentina his opinion regarding the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District court, Southern District of New York. [1]
The judgment in the case is likely to cause the collapse of the Argentinian economy for the scond time in 15 years and cause poverty and misery for millions in Argentina.
Regarding the collapse of the Argentinian economy in 2001, Nobel prize winner Joseph Stieglitz raised the suspicion in his book "Globalization and Its Discontent" that the collapse was the handiwork of Stanley Fischer in his capacity as a senior officer of the International Monetary Fund (later Governor of Bank of Israel, today No 2 in the US Federal Reserve), at the service of US agencies.
The opinion, filed today, in part says:
Joseph Zernik, PhD, herein opines that fraud is being committed on the people and the Republic of Argentina by the US government and its agencies, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, and the US Supreme Court in the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York.
US Judge Thomas Griesa, Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick, and all attorneys, who filed papers in the case, including the law-firm, which filed on behalf of the Republic of Argentina, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP, should be deemed part of the conspiracy to defraud.
Attached to the opinion is a paper, submitted for publication, which provides detailed analysis of the litigation records in the case, and which shows missing Summons, invalid Notice of Assignment for US Judge Thomas Griesa, and denial of public access to the authentication records.
The opinion is also based on other cases of fraud in the same court, which is notorious for fraud in banking matters. The most notable among these cases is SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829), where Judge Jed Rakoff appeared as presiding Judge. The PACER docket in SEC v Bank of America Corporation included no copy of the summons in disregard of US law, as is the case in NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina. The summons in SEC v Bank of America Corporation was eventually discovered through a Freedom of Information request on SEC. As seen here, the summons is unsigned, and fails to bear the seal of the court, i.e., invalid summons. SEC v Bank of America Corporation was a landmark court case, relative to banking supervision under the current financial crisis. It originated in the unlawful taking of $5.8 billions by banking executives. US Judge Jed Rakoff colluded with Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick and attorneys for SEC and Bank of America Corporation and conducted Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York, which ended with no executive being held accountable and none of the ill-gotten funds returned by the offending executives.
The paper concludes that conduct of the US courts over the past decade should be deemed organized state-corporate crime and an unannounced regime change in the United States. It is also central to abuse of the people of the United States and failing banking regulation. In the case of NML v Republic of Argentina the US courts reach beyond the territorial US, to rob the people of Argentina through fraud of medieval style and proportions.
Copies of the opinion were filed with the governments of the German Federal Republic, the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
PO Box 334!, "e# $%i%, &sr'e# "( 334! )"(* +,333, ,-34.+x/0123'i#45o3 Embassy of Argentina in Israel 85 Medinat Ha-Yehudim, Tel-Aviv By hand delivery by email! "eisra#$an$illeria%gob%ar& RE: NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-0698) To the Honorable 'arlos (austino )ar$ia, Ambassador of the *e+ubli$ of Argentina to the ,tate of Israel! The undersigned, -ose+h .erni/, 0h1, res+e$tfully submits to the government of the *e+ubli$ of Argentina his o+inion regarding litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina 23!48-$v-456788 in the 9, 1istri$t 'ourt, ,outhern 1istri$t of :e; Yor/% My e<+erien$e in su$h matters and further details are +rovided in the atta$hed re$ords% -ose+h .erni/, 0h1, herein o+ines that fraud is being $ommitted on the +eo+le and the *e+ubli$ of Argentina by the 9, government and its agen$ies, the 9, 1istri$t 'ourt, ,outhern 1istri$t of :e; Yor/, the 9, 'ourt of A++eals, =nd 'ir$uit, and the 9, ,u+reme 'ourt in the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina 23!48-$v- 456788 in the 9, 1istri$t 'ourt, ,outhern 1istri$t of :e; Yor/% 9, -udge Thomas )riesa, 'ler/ of the 'ourt *uby >ra?i$/, and all attorneys, ;ho filed +a+ers in the $ase, in$luding the la;-firm, ;hi$h filed on behalf of the *e+ubli$ of Argentina, 'leary )ottlieb ,teen @ Hamilton, AA0, should be deemed +art of the $ons+ira$y to defraud% Atta$hed +lease find! 3% -ose+h .erni/, 0h1, and Human *ights Alert 2:)B8 =% -ose+h .erni/, C*obbing Argentina in the 9, $ourt in Manhattan - fraud of medieval style and +ro+ortionsC - +a+er submitted for +ubli$ation The last se$tion of the +a+er in =%, above, lists several additional ste+s that $ould be underta/en by the *e+ubli$ of Argentina to further do$ument the fraud% ,igned this date, ,unday, ,e+tember 7, =43D, in Tel Aviv, Israel EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE -ose+h .erni/, 0h1 ''! 3% The Honorable Aud;ig Martin Blauro$/, )eneral 'onsul of the )erman (ederal *e+ubli$ to Israel F 1aniel (ris$h ,treet, Tel Aviv By hand delivery and by email! "r/-3#tela%aus;aertiges-amt%de& =% The Honorable 0an .hanlin, Ambassador of the 0eo+leGs *e+ubli$ of 'hina to Israel === Ben Yehuda ,treet, Tel-Aviv By hand delivery and by email! "$hinaembEil#mfa%gov%$n& F% The Honorable )ennadii Tarasov, Ambassador of the *ussian (ederation to Israel 3=4 Hayar/on ,treet, Tel Aviv By hand delivery and by email! "ambEru#mail%netvision%net%il& D% The Honorable Mi$hael A *atney, )eneral 'onsul of the 9nited ,tates to -erusalem, -erusalem By email! "*atneyMA#state%gov& 3H3 Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik, PhD Date: 2014.09.07 17:54:57 +03'00'
Human Rights Alert (NGO) (NGO) Joseph Zernik, PhD " PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, srael "n 33407 x"n, 6133301 123456xyz@gmail.com Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) Human Rights Alert (NGO) The 2010 Human Rights Alert ["HRA"] submission for the UPR of the United States focused on conditions in os Angeles !ount"# !alifornia$ The submission %ro&ided documentation of large'scale false im%risonment and real estate and financial institution fraud b" State of !alifornia (udges in collusion )ith attorne"s and financial institutions# under %atronage of local# state# and federal la) enforcement authorities$ The submission )as incor%orated b" reference into the Human Rights !ouncil ["HR!"] Professional Staff Re%ort )ith a note referring to *corru%tion of the courts and the legal %rofession and discrimination b" la) enforcement in !alifornia+$[ i ] The submission )as in %art based on documentation of large'scale fraud in ,T s"stems of the Su%erior !ourt of !alifornia# !ount" of os Angeles -Sustain.# and in the ,T s"stems of the os Angeles !ount" Sheriff/s 0e%artment -,nmate ,nformation !enter.$ [ ii # iii ] The 2011 HRA submission for the UPR of the State of ,srael focused on anal"sis of the ,T s"stems of the Su%reme !ourt# the district courts# and the detainees/ courts in ,srael$ The submission %ro&ided documentation of large'scale fraud in such s"stems# )hich started in 2002$ The submission )as incor%orated b" reference into the HR! Professional Staff Re%ort )ith a note referring to *lac2 of integrit" in the electronic record s"stems of the Su%reme !ourt# the district courts and the detainees/ courts in ,srael$+ [ i& ] 3ose%h 4erni2# Ph0# the author of instant submission# has s%eciali5ed o&er the %ast decade in anal"5ing the ,T s"stems of courts# %risons# and ban2s$ His re%orts on these sub(ects )ere %eer're&ie)ed# %ublished and %resented in international com%uter science -data mining. and criminolog" conferences$ [ & ] A te6tboo2 on "7achine earning" found 0r 4erni2/s a%%lication of data'mining to Human Rights research among "8otable uses"# and summari5ed it as follo)s9 [ &i ] Data mining of government records - particularly records of the justice system (i.e., courts, prisons) - enables the discovery of systemic human rights violations in connection to generation and publication of invalid or fraudulent legal records by various government agencies. [ vii , viii ] ,t is li2el" that the HRA submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States# and e&en more so the HRA submission for the 2011 UPR of the State of ,srael# are the first'e&er Human Rights re%orts that are focused on ,T s"stem anal"sis and data mining of such s"stems$ :hereas the 2010 HRA submission focused on the !alifornia courts and %risons and their ,T s"stems# the 201; submission focuses on the US federal courts and their res%ecti&e ,T s"stems$ END NOE!" 1<2 i Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the UPR of the United States (2010), as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights Council site HTTP://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights %20alert1.ppdf Human Rights Alert (NGO) Appendix to submission for the UPR of the United States by the United Nations Human Rights Council http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights %20alert1.pdf http://www.scribd.com/doc/29564374/ United Nations Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report, referring to Human Rights Alert submission with the note "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California" (page 6, paragraph 45) http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/169/65/PDF/G1016965.pdf?OpenElement ii Zernik, J: Beyond voting machines - case management systems of the courts - Sustain and the Los Angeles Superior Court Part http://es.scribd.com/doc/110477747/ Zernik, J: Beyond electronic voting machines - fraud in case management systems of the courts - Sustain and the Los Angeles Superior Court - Part http://es.scribd.com/doc/110475097/ Zernik, J: Beyond voting machines - case management systems of the courts - Sustain - CMS of the Los Angeles Superior Court - Abstract and Figures s http://es.scribd.com/doc/30162880/ Zernik, J: Computers & the Courts - Sustain - CMS of the Los Angeles Superior Court - Registers of Action http://es.scribd.com/doc/30162461/ iii Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty Online Public Prisoners' Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010) http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/ iv Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the UPR of the State of srael (2013), as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights Council site: The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission (2013) for the Universal Periodic Review of israel by the UN Human Rights Council, as it appears on the UN web site http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/L/HRA_UPR_SR_S15_2012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf 2013-01-01 The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission, as incorporated into the UN Human Rtghts Council UPR report with the note "Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in srael" (page 4, paragraph 25) http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/180/12/PDF/G1218012.pdf?OpenElement 2012-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix to Submission; 15th UPR - State of srael - "ntegrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of srael" https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU/edit?usp=sharing v Biographical Sketch Joseph Zernik, PhD http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/ vi Wiki Nerds, "Machine Learning", Google books http://books.google.co.il/books? id=4ZayAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false vii Joseph Zernik. "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation" Data Analytics, 2012 http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059 viii Joseph Zernik, "ntegrity, or Lack Thereof, of the Electronic Record Systems of the Courts of the State of srael", Data Analytics, 2012 http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_2_10_00! Human Rights Alert (NGO) (NGO) Joseph Zernik, PhD " PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, srael "n 33407 x"n, 6133301 123456xyz@gmail.com Robbing Argentina in the US court in Manhattan - fraud of medieval stle and !ro!ortions by Joseph Zernik, PhD, Human Rights Alert (NGO) No summons, invalid Notice of Assignment for US Judge Thomas Griesa, and denial of public access to the authentication records in a court that is notorious for fraud in banking matters... Conduct of the US courts over the past decade should be deemed an unannounced regime change in the United States. t is also central to abuse of the people of the United States and failing banking regulation. n the case of N!" v #epublic of Argentina the US courts reach be$ond the territorial US, to rob the people of Argentina through fraud of medieval st$le and proportions. Oupy!"#, $eptember % - for the seon& time in '( years, the )$ is ausing the ollapse o* the Argentinian eonomy, in*liting po+erty an& misery on millions ] . i [ ,n -..', Argentina sho/e& 0a &eline /ithout parallel01 !he eonomi ollapse o* Argentina /ipe& out the mi&&le lass an& raise& the le+el o* po+erty to (21(31 4illions in Argentina /ere thro/n into unemployment, po+erty an& hunger1 !hat, a*ter being "atin Ameria5s star in the '66.s1 7 ii 8 !he ollapse o* the Argentinian eonomy pu99le& many1111 :ut others o**ere& e;planations< ,n his book 0Globali9ation an& ,ts Disontent0, none other than Nobel pri9e /inner Joseph $tieglit9 raise& the suspiion that the ollapse o* the Argentinian eonomy /as the han&i/ork o* $tanley =isher in his apaity as a senior o**ier o* the ,nternational 4onetary =un& (later Go+ernor o* :ank o* ,srael, to&ay No - in the )$ =e&eral Reser+e), at the ser+ie o* )$ agenies1 7 iii 8 Others state it more learly< >entral to the ollapse /as the implementation o* neo? liberal poliies /hih enable& the s/in&le o* billions o* &ollars by *oreign banks an& orporations1 ,n -.'@, the *rau& is more bra9en1 ,n litigation in the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, /hih is opine& here as *rau&, Ju&ge Griesa issue& rulings, or&ers, an& Bu&gments, /hih &oom the Argentinian eonomy1 NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina ("#$%-cv-$&'(%) in the US )istrict *ourt+ Southern )istrict of Ne, -or. US Judge Thomas Griesa; Street scene from the Argentinian economic collapse of 2001. "a/ re+ie/ summari9e& the ase as *ollo/s< 7 i+ 8 n 2001, Argentina defaulted on more than ninety-five billion dollars in external debt. At the time, this constituted the largest sovereign default in history. Argentina initiated two restructurings in 2005 and 2010, allowing holders of defaulted bonds to exchange 15 / 1 U n d U n d their bonds for new debt at a rate of twenty-five to twenty-nine cents on the dollar, thus restructuring more than ninety-one percent of the foreign debt on which it had defaulted in 2001. Hedge funds specializing in trading distressed sovereign debt, such as Elliott Associates, purchased large amounts of Argentinian debt at a significant discount on the secondary market, and "held outthey refused to join the restructurings and sought full collection of their debt. n February 2012, Judge Griesa of the District Court for the Southern District of New York issued orders enjoining Argentina from making payments on its restructured 2005 and 2010 debt without making ratable payments to NML Capital, a distressed- debt hedge fund affiliated with Elliott Associates. n October 2012, a unanimous panel of the Second Circuit substantially affirmed the orders.6 Argentina was not to make full payment on its restructured debt without also making full payment to the holdout plaintiffs... The decision, therefore, would seem to doom consensual sovereign debt restructuring. ,n plain language, a single hol&?out &ebt hol&er, N4" >apital, an un&ermine the onsensual agreement o* the Republi o* Argentina an& the maBority o* its &ebt hol&ers, an& e;tort *a+orable treatment through the ruling o* a )$ Bu&ge in Ne/ Aork1 :eyon& the ommonsense absur&ity o* the situation, one must in suh a ase &oubt the integrity o* the )$ ourt an& Ju&ge !homas Griesa111 A*ter all, )$ e;perts repeate&ly pointe& out the entral role o* the orrupt )$ ourts an& Bustie system in the ongoing *inanial risis< Conomis Nobel pri9e /inner Paul Drugman /rote, 0 111 a system in /hih only the little people ha+e to obey the la/, /hile the rih, an& bankers espeially, an heat an& &e*rau& /ithout onseEuenes10 7 + 8 "a/ Pro*essor Raymon& :resia more spei*ially opine&, 0111it5s &i**iult to *in& a *rau& o* this si9e on the )$ ourt system in )$ history111 /here you ha+e literally tens o* thousan&s o* *rau&ulent &ouments *ile& in tens o* thousan&s o* ases10 7 +i 8 ,n&ee&, re+ie/ o* the ourt reor&s in N!" Capital, "td. v. The #epublic of Argentina ('<.F?+?.%62F) in the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, lea&s to the onlusion that the ase shoul& be &eeme& $imulate& "itigation an& =rau& upon the >ourt1 4oreo+er, the same )$ >ourt shoul& be onsi&ere& entral to *ailing banking regulation un&er the urrent risis1 7 +ii , +iii 8 Simulated /itigation and 0raud u!on the *ourt - Organi1ed State-cor!orate *rime 2 i3 4 !hrough the implementation an& employment o* in+ali& ,! systems in the )$ ourts (PA>CR an& >4GC>=), the )$ ourts to&ay issue an& publish Bu&iial an& lerial reor&s that are in+ali& an& +oi& on their *aes1 ,n suh sham reor&s, )$ Bu&ges unla/*ully &epri+e the >i+il, >onstitutional, an& Human Rights o* the people1 Regar&less o* the in+ali&ity o* suh reor&s, the ourts in&ue an&Gor e;tort ompliane /ith suh in+ali&, *rau&ulent Bu&iial reor&s1 !he on&ut o* *rau& in litigation, outline& abo+e, is *urther &etaile& in the Te%as &enal Code H I-1@F ? $imulating "egal Proess< 7 ; 8 ,ssue Bu&iial an&Gor lerial reor&s that are in+ali&, +oi& on their *aes1 $ign, sen&, &oket an&Gor publish suh Bu&iial an&Gor lerial reor&s by unauthori9e& persons1 $er+e *alse reor&s that in&ue their reei+er to belie+e that they are +ali& an& e**etual summonses, omplaints, or&ers, or Bu&gments1 Generate, sen&, an&Gor publish *alse authentiation reor&s *or suh Bu&iial an&Gor lerial reor&s1 $ign, sen&, an&Gor publish Bu&iial an&Gor lerial reor&s o* +ague an& ambiguous language, /hih the ourt may &eem patently in+ali&, but the reei+er is in&ue& to belie+e are +ali&1 ,n&ue an&Gor e;tort submission to the *alse authority o* suh reor&s1 15 / 2 ,n terms o* )$ la/, the on&ut o* $imulate& "itigation, as &e*ine& in the Te%as &enal Code I-1@F, shoul& be &eeme& 0=rau& upon the >ourt01 ,n 'ulloch v. United States, 2%I =1-& '''(, ''-' ('.th >ir1 '6F(), the >ourt says< Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... t is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted. !he pratie o* $imulate& "itigation shoul& also be onsi&ere& raketeering un&er the )$ #acketeer nfluenced and Corrupt (rgani)ations Act ()$> H'6%') ? a onspiray to on&ut an enterprise through a pattern o* raketeering ati+ity1 !he notion o* Bu&ges an& ourts ating as a raketeering enterprises is not ne/ at all1 ,n the most reent e;ample, *ormer Pennsyl+ania Ju&ge >ia+arella /as proseute& an& on+ite& on raketeering harges in the /ake o* the 0Di&s *or >ash0 orruption san&al1 7 ;i 8 Jhereas the on+ition o* *ormer Bu&ge >ia+arella /as relate& to the prison in&ustry, the ase o* N!" Capital v #epublic of Argentina an& other ases in the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, are relate& to the banking in&ustry1 =urthermore, the on&ut o* the )$ ourts an& )$ Bustie system, seen in N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, reahes beyon& the territorial )$1 ,t is not the only ase o* this nature1 Other notable e;amples inlu&e< Deriminali9ation o* torture an& the unla/*ul &epri+ation o* "iberty in the Guantanamo :ay &etention enter an& in a net/ork o* 0blak hole0 prisons /orl&? /i&eK 7 ;ii 8 Deriminali9ation o* the in+ol+ement o* )$ agenies in trans?national &rug an& *irearms tra**iking, 7 ;iii , ;i+ 8 an& &eriminali9ation o* the in+ol+ement o* )$ banks in trans?national money laun&ering *or &rug artels1 7 ;+ , ;+i , ;+ii 8 !here*ore, on&ut o* the )$ ourts shoul& also be re+ie/e& un&er the terms o* the United Nations Convention against Transnational (rgani)ed Crime (-...)1 7 ;+iii 8 >on&itions, /here a nation5s Bustie system engages in suh onspiray is also re*erre& to in riminology as 0$tate Organi9e& >rime0, or 0$tate?orporate Organi9e& >rime01 NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina - missing summons+ invalid Notice of Assignment+ denial of access to authentication records+ other missing .e records5 2 3i3 4 15 / 3 nitial entries in the docket of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina in the US District Court, Southern District of New York: [ xx ] a) Summons as issued by the clerk was not docketed with the Complaint (Dkt #1), neither was it docketed with the Affidavit of Service (Dkt #4). b) Civil Cover Sheet, required by the Judicial Conference of the United States for the opening of the civil docket, was not docketed with the Complaint (Dkt #1) [ xxi ]. c) Notice of Case Assignment (Dkt #5) is invalid - bear invalid signature of the Clerk of the Court. Combined, the initial records in the docket document the commencing of Simulated Litigation. Missing Summons !he ser+ie o* a summons is reEuire& *or the ourt to establish its Buris&ition o+er the party, /ho is being summone&1 !he *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure, Rule @, presribes that summons must be signe& by the lerk an& bear the ourt5s seal1 !he *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure, Rule 26 presribes that the lerk &oket the summons as issue&, as /ell as proo* o* ser+ie1 ,n blatant &isregar& o* the )$ la/, the )$ ourts to&ay o*ten *ail to issue summonses that are signe& by the lerk an& bear the ourt5s seal, an& also *ail to &oket the summons, so that suh *atal &e*ets, /hih un&ermine the +ali&ity o* the entire litigation, are not transparent to the publi1 ,n the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, the *ailure to &oket the summons also stan&s in &isregar& o* the "ocal #ules of Court an& the +lectronic Case *iling #ules and nstructions o* the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork1 7 ;;ii 8 )nite& Nations reports on strengthening Bu&iial integrity list missing ourt reor&s as an in&iator o* Bu&iial orruption1 7 ;;iii 8 15 / 4 6nvalid Notice of Assignment Notice of Assignment to Judge Thomas Griesa (Dkt #5) - the Notice is unsigned and invalid. Therefore Judge Griesa was acting in this case with no authority at all. The issuance of invalid Assignment Notices to judges and Reference Notices to magistrates is a typical initial step in commencing of Simulated Litigation !he Notie o* Assignment to Ju&ge !homas Griesa (Dkt L() bears no +ali& signature o* the lerk, an& is there*ore in+ali&1 !he in+ali&ity o* the Notie o* Assignment ren&ers the on&ut o* Ju&ge Griesa in the entire ase o* no authority at all, an& *urther un&ermines the integrity an& +ali&ity o* the the entire litigation1 !he in+ali&ity o* the Notie o* Assignment to Ju&ge is also typial o* the reor&s employe& *or ommening $imulate& "itigation in the )$ ourts1 ,t shoul& be note& that the -..% attempt to impeah )$ Ju&ge 4anuel Real o* the )$ Distrit >ourt, >entral Distrit o* >ali*ornia, originate& in his on&ut in a ase, /here he ate& /ith no la/*ul assignment1 7 ;;i+ 8 )enial of !ublic access to authentication records !he ser+ie o* Bu&iial an& lerial reor&s, as /ell as the &oumentation o* the ser+ie are essential *or their authentiation an& *or ren&ering them o* *ore an& e**et1 Aor&ingly, the *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure, Rule (, presribe that the >erti*iates o* $er+ie be *ile& an& &okete&1 As sho/n in the ase o* N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, an& in all ases un&er eletroni *iling in the )$ ourts to&ay, +ali& >erti*iates o* $er+ie are no longer &okete& an& are not aessible to the publi as part o* the ourts5 reor&s in PA>CR1 !here*ore, the publi an& e+en parties to litigation annot &istinguish 15 / 5 bet/een +ali& an& +oi& ourt reor&s1 $uh pro*oun& hanges in the *un&amentals o* Due Proess ren&er ourt reor&s an& the Bu&iial proess +ague an& ambiguous, an& enable the routine on&ut o* $imulate& "itigation1 !hese pro*oun& hanges in ourt proe&ures /ere implemente& by the )$ Bu&iiary /ith no la/*ul authority at all, onomitantly /ith the establishment o* eletroni *iling1 Traditional paper Certificate of Service by the Clerk of the Court in Wright v Bank of America (10-cv-01723), US District Court, Northern District of California. The record included a certification statement, " certify., as well as the name and authority of the individual executing the certification - Deputy Clerk. However, the document shown here is invalid, since it is missing a valid signature of the Deputy Clerk. The certification records were an essential part of the public records in the paper court files. n contrast, under electronic filing, the US judiciary instituted Notices of Electronic Filing (NEFs) as the replacement of the Certificates of Service, and at the same time deny public access to the NEFs. Notie o* Cletroni =iling 70NC=08 in the )$ &istrit ourts are onsi&ere& by the )$ ourts the authentiation instruments in the ,! systems, establishe& by the A&ministrati+e O**ie o* the )$ >ourts through the &ual publi aess an& ase managementGeletroni *iling systems (PA>CR M >4GC>=, respeti+ely)1 !he NC= 15 / 6 replae& the tra&itional, paper >erti*iate o* $er+ie, or Proo* o* $er+ie1 !here*ore, the NC= is o* ritial signi*iane relati+e to the +ali&ity, *ore an& e**et o* Bu&iial minutes, or&ers an& Bu&gments1 Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF), pertaining to Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - Dkt #1, in Richard Fine v Sheriff of Lo Angele Count! (2:09-cv-01914), US District Court, Central District of California. The NEF shown here includes an "Electronic Document Stamp" (an alpha-numeric checksum string), which pursuant to "eneral #rder 08-02 of that court, verifies the authenticity of the respective court record. [ xxv ] With it, one should note that the NEF is invalid as a "Certificate of Service" on its face: The record fails to include: a) A certification statement, " certify., b) The name and authority of the individual who executed it, and c) A valid signature of such individual. Furthermore, in contrast with the paper Certificates of Service, which were part of the case docket, the NEFs are excluded from the PACER docket in disregard of US law, and public access to the NEFs is denied. The 70 year old former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed and rebuked the taking by California judges of "not permitted payments", which were called by media "bribes". Fine was falsely imprisoned for 18 months in solitary confinement in 2009-10 by Sheriff Lee Baca of Los Angeles County, with no lawful records conforming with the fundamental requirements of law. [ xxvi ] His Habeas Corpus 15 / 7 petitions were subjected to simulated review by the US District Court, Central District of California, the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and the US Supreme Court. Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF), pertaining to Mandate of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Dkt #59, in Richard Fine v Sheriff of Lo Angele Count! (2:09-cv-01914), US District Court, Central District of California. The NEF in this case is invalid, missing the "Electronic Document Stamp". Numerous, similar, invalid NEFs, missing the "Electronic Document Stamp" were discovered in other US district courts. The detailed documentation of the cases, related to the Habeas Corpus actions of Richard Fine in the US courts provide unique demonstration of the abuse inherent in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF: 1. A simulated Habeas Corpus review was conducted in the US District Court, Central District of California, where judicial records were filed with NEFs missing the "Electronic Document Stamp". n such invalid, simulated litigation, Magistrate Carla Woehrle and Judge John Walter issued abusive judicial records, which did not comply with the US Constitution and the US law and unlawfully deprived the Liberty of Richard Fine. 2. When Fine filed his actions in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, taken from such simulated litigation records in the US District Court, the US Court of Appeals responded by conducting a simulated review as well, and by issuing simulated orders and mandates, colluding in the abuse of rights. 3. When the US District Court received such simulated Mandates from the US Court of Appeals, the US District Court docketed them as invalid, simulated judicial records as well, with an invalid NEF, as shown here. 15 / 8 Docket entry, Dkt #none, pertaining to Deletion of Order of Disbarment - Dkt #4, in $n R%& Ronald "ottchalk (2:11-mc-00284) in the US District Court, Central District of California. The text re-affirms that the January 11, 2012 Order of Disbarment/Suspension by Chief Judge Audrey Collins (dispositive order, akin to judgment in such case) was issued with no NEF, and was therefore deleted. However, it should be noted that this docket entry is of the "Text only" type, entered by a person of unknown name and authority, is unsigned and unauthenticated. Ronald Gottschalk was a Los Angeles Attorney, who like Richard Fine protested judicial corruption. Like Richard Fine he was falsely arrested in 2009 (albeit for a few weeks only), and like Richard Fine he also was falsely hospitalized. However, whereas Richard Fine was kept in solitary confinement for 18 months in the hospital section of the jail, Gottschalk was kept in an outside psychiatric ward. Gottschalk reported that he was forced to take psychiatric medications, while being denied critical diabetes medication. Through communication with the author of this report, Gottschalk was educated regarding the significance of the NEF and its "Electronic Document Stamp". Therefore, when he received the Order of Disbarment with an invalid NEF, he filed the request to delete it from the docket. Chief Judge Audrey Collins apparently consented. [ xxvii ] t is instructive that both Fine and Gottschalk, senior, experienced attorneys, who were authorized CM/ECF participants and passed the mandatory instruction, were entirely unaware of the significance of the NEF and the "Electronic Document Stamp" for validity, force and effect of judicial records. Such conditions reflect the lack of authority and ambiguous records, pertaining to the definition of fundamental court procedures in PACER and CM/ECF - the fraudulent T systems of the US courts. !o&ay the NC=s are onsi&ere& by the )$ ourts to&ay the >erti*iates o* $er+ie, Notie o* Cntry o* Ju&gment1 Ho/e+er, publi aess to the NC=s is &enie&, sine they are not inlu&e& in the PA>CR &okets in &isregar& o* the *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure. Jith it, the )$ &istrit ourts o*ten issue an& &oket or&ers an& Bu&gments /ith no NC=s or /ith in+ali& NC=s1 )n&er suh on&itions, the publi, an& at times e+en e;periene& attorneys are unable to &istinguish bet/een +ali& Bu&iial reor&s o* *ull *ore an& e**et, an& in+ali&, +oi& Bu&iial reor&s1 !he )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, uni+ersally &enies publi aess to the NC=s o* reor&s in its PA>CR &okets, inlu&ing the reor&s in N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina. !here*ore, there is no /ay *or the publi to asertain, /hether any o* Ju&ge Griesa5s rulings, or&ers, an& Bu&gments /ere authentiate&, entere&, an& erti*ie& ? an& there*ore o* any *ore an& e**et1 $uh serious ambiguity regar&ing the +ali&ity an& e**et o* ourt reor&s in N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, shoul& not &oubt be onsi&ere& a serious +iolation o* Due Proess rights1 ,t shoul& be note& that )nite& Nations reports on strengthening Bu&iial integrity list &enial o* aess an in&iator o* Bu&iial orruption1 Other missing .e records Other key reor&s, /hih are missing in the &oket o* N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina inlu&e, but are not limite& to< ,nitial >on*erene (presribe& by Rule -%, *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure), an& Notie o* Cntry o* Ju&gment (presribe& by Rule I%, *ederal #ules of Civil &rocedure)1 15 / 9 0raud in ban.ing matters is common in the US )istrict *ourt+ Southern )istrict of Ne, -or.+ and other US courts Summons as issued by the Clerk of the Court and as executed in S%C v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York. The PACER docket in S%C v Bank of America Corporation included no copy of the summons in disregard of US law, as is the case in NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina' The summons in S%C v Bank of America Corporation was eventually discovered through a Freedom of nformation request on SEC. As seen here, the summons is unsigned, and fails to bear the seal of the court, i.e., invalid summons. S%C v Bank of America Corporation was a landmark court case, relative to banking supervision under the current financial crisis. t originated in the unlawful taking of $5.8 billions by banking executives. US Judge Jed Rakoff colluded with Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick and attorneys for SEC and Bank of America Corporation and conducted Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York, which ended with no executive being held accountable and none of the ill-gotten funds returned by the offending executives. As &oumente& in &etail in other ases in the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, on&ut o* $imulate& "itigation in banking matters is a ommon pratie by )$ Bu&ges in that ourt an& in other )$ ourts to&ay1 7 ;;+iii 8 15 / 10 A notable e;ample is S+C v 'ank of America Corporation ('<.6?+?.%F-6) an& the relate& ase o* S+C v 'AC ('<'.?+ N..-'(), /hih originate& in the unla/*ul taking o* O(1F billions by banking e;euti+es &uring the merger o* :ank o* Ameria an& 4errill "ynh in late -..F1 7 ;;i; 8 !he litigation, un&er )$ Ju&ge Je& Rako**, /ho /as haile& by the Jall $treet Journal as 0tough0 in this ase, en&e& /ith a payment o* O'II millions by the +itims ? the sharehol&ers ? to themsel+es being impose& by the >ourt1 No e;euti+e /as hel& aountable, an& no e;euti+e returne& to the sharehol&ers any o* the ill?gotten *un&s1 As is the ase in N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, the summons in S+C v 'ank of America Corporation /as not &okete&, in &isregar& o* )$ la/1 Ju&ge Je& Rako** hel& no la/*ul assignment in the ase, an& aess to the NC=s /as &enie&1 !he summons reor& in S+C v 'ank of America Corporation /as e+entually &iso+ere& through a =ree&om o* ,n*ormation reEuest on $C>1 As sho/n here it /as in+ali& on its *ae ? bearing no signature o* the >lerk o* the >ourt an& no $eal o* the >ourt1 !he ase &ouments ollusion o* attorneys ating on behal* o* the )$ go+ernment an& $C>, attorneys *or :ank o* Ameria >orporation, Ju&ge Je& Rako** an& >lerk o* the >ourt Ruby DraBik in the on&ut o* $imulate& "itigation1 4e&ia reports heere& along111 ReEuests *or ,mpeahment o* Ju&ge Je& Rako** an& >lerk o* the >ourt Ruby DraBik, /hih /ere *ile& /ith the )$ >ongress, &oument the *ailure o* )$ >ongress to per*orm its &uties1 7 ;;; , ;;;i , ;;;ii , ;;;iii , ;;;i+ 8 0raud of medieval stle and !ro!ortions =rau& in the ourts /as notorious &uring the mi&&le ages, partiularly through the issuane o* *rau&ulent reor&s by Bu&ges1 !he o**ie o* the >lerk o* the >ourt /as institute& in the late mi&&le ages an& ourt proe&ures in+ol+ing authentiation an& erti*iation o* Bu&iial reor&s by the >lerk o* the >ourt ha+e e+ol+e& o+er enturies to sa*eguar& the integrity o* the ourts an& the Bu&iial proess1 7 ;;;+ 8 ,n ontrast, on&itions, /hih ha+e been establishe& in the )$ ourts /ith the implementation o* their ,! systems ? PA>CR an& >4GC>= ? un&ermine all suh sa*eguar&s1 7 xxxvi 8 =rau& in the mi&&le ages /as largely *ailitate& through the illiteray o* the +ast maBority o* the people1 =rau& in our times is *ailitate& through the illiteray o* the +ast maBority o* the people regar&ing eletroni reor&s1 US *ongress+ e3!erts+ media betra the trust of the !eo!le As repeate&ly sho/n, )$ >ongress re*uses to akno/le&ge or at on reEuests *or impeahment o* )$ Bu&ges, /ho on&ut $imulate& "itigation an& abuse the rights o* the people o* the )nite& $tates1 )$ me&ia, /hih report on lan&mark ases that are ob+ious =rau& upon the >ourts, *ail to &islose suh *ats to the publi, e+en a*ter getting noties, alerting them to the true *ats in the matters being reports1 "ike/ise, )$ la/ pro*essors routinely re*use to opine on the unpree&ente& *rau& in the ,! systems o* the )$ ourts, PA>CR an& >4GC>=, an& )$ la/ Bournals re*use to aept *or re+ie/ papers, /hih &isuss suh *rau&1 7 ;;;+ii 8 Regar&ing the ase o* N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, a reEuest *or omments /as *or/ar&e& to Romain Zamour, urrently Assistant "egal >ounsel in the Permanent >ourt o* Arbitration (P>A) in the Hague, Netherlan&s, /ho publishe& the sholarly la/ artile, ite& abo+e, in The ,ale Journal of nternational "a- (nline. Notice o!ining fraud ,as filed ,ith the government of the Re!ublic of Argentina and others 15 / 11 Gi+en the o+erarhing international signi*iane o* the ase o* N!" Capital v The #epublic of Argentina, notie /as *ile& /ith the go+ernment o* the Republi o* Argentina1 !he notie in part says< ...fraud is being committed on the people and the Republic of Argentina by the US government and its agencies, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, and the US Supreme Court, relative to the litigation of NML Capital v The Republic of Argentina (1:08-cv-06978) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York. US Judge Thomas Griesa, Clerk of the Court Ruby Krajick, and all attorneys, who filed papers in the case, including the law-firms who filed on behalf of the Republic of Argentina, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP, should be deemed part of the conspiracy to defraud. >opies o* the notie /ere *ile& /ith the go+ernments o* the German =e&eral Republi, People5s Republi o* >hina, Russian =e&eration, an& the )nite& $tates1 7hat could the Re!ublic of Argentina do ne3t8 !he Republi o* Argentina oul& &iretly (not through the la/?*irm o* >leary et al) a&&ress >lerk o* the >ourt Ruby DraBik o* the )$ Distrit >ourt, $outhern Distrit o* Ne/ Aork, an& &eman&< '1 An a**i&a+it stating that the PA>CR &oket in N!" Capital v #epublic of Argentina is a +ali& an& e**etual &oket o* the >ourt, /hih /as onstrute& un&er the authority o* the >lerk o* the >ourt an& in ompliane /ith the la/ o* the )nite& $tatesK -1 A opy o* the $ummons, erti*ie& 0!rue >opy o* the Original0 by the >lerk o* the >ourt, an& I1 >opies o* the Notie o* Assignment an& all Or&ers, Ju&gments an& 4an&ates, /hih appear in the PA>CR &oket, together /ith the respeti+e NC=s, erti*ie& 0!rue >opy o* the Original0 by the >lerk o* the >ourt1 :ase& on e;periene /ith se+eral lerks o* the )$ ourts, inlu&ing >lerk Ruby DraBik, it is unlikely that suh &eman&s by the Republi o* Argentina /oul& be honestly a&&resse&1 =ailure to a&&ress suh &eman&s shoul& be onsi&ere& a&&itional e+i&ene o* the *rau& being ommitte& in this ase1 ,n ase any o* the abo+e re*erene& reor&s are obtaine& *rom >lerk Ruby DraBik, they are likely to pro+i&e a&&itional e+i&ene o* the *rau& in on&ut o* the ase1 A&&itionally, in ase any suh reor&s are obtaine& *rom >lerk Ruby DraBik, they shoul& be *urther *or/ar&e& to the O**ie o* Authentiations, )$ Department o* $tate, /ith a reEuest *or Apostille >erti*iates, pursuant to the .ague Apostille Convention ('6%')1 ,t is unlikely that the )$ Department o* $tate /oul& pro+i&e suh Apostille >erti*iates *or the abo+e re*erene& reor&s1 ,* it &oes, it /oul& pro+i&e a&&itional e+i&ene o* riminality by the )$ go+ernment1 9N) NO:9S 15 / 12 i 2014-06-30 Joseph Zernik, "ARGENTNA: Again on the verge of economic collapse - again the victim of US treachery!", #p%dNe('com http://www.opednews.com/articles/3/ARGENTNA-Again-on-the-ve-by-Joseph-Zernik-Argentina_Global-Banking- Cartel_nternational-Monetary-Fund--MF_srael-140630-923.html ii 2002-02-28 "Argentina's collapse. A decline without parallel", The %conomit ///1eonomist1omGno&eG'.'.6'' iii 2002-06-06 "Globalisation and its discontents by Joseph Stieglitz", The %conomit ///1arlin&o?orreia1omG'..6.-1html iv Romain Zamour, "NML v. Argentina and the Ratable Payment nterpretation of the Pari Passu Clause", The )ale *ournal of $nternational La( #nline http://www.yjil.org/docs/pub/o-38-zamour-nml-v-argentina.pdf v 2011-03-13 Paul Krugman, "Another nside Job", Ne( )ork Time ///1nytimes1omG-.''G.IG'@GopinionG'@krugman1htmlPQrR. +i 2011-12-22 "Special Report: The watchdogs that didn't bark", Reuter http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/22/us-foreclosures-idUSTRE7BL0MC20111222 vii 2012-09-26 Joseph Zernik, "Large-scale fraud in US court records is linked to failing banking regulation", #p%dNe('com http://www.opednews.com/articles/Large-scale-fraud-in-US-co-by-Joseph-Zernik-120925-643.html +iii 2014-01-06 Joseph Zernik, "Duplicitous US judges: Jed Rakoff, Richard Leon", #p%dNe('com http://www.opednews.com/articles/Duplicitous-US-judges-Jed-by-Joseph-Zernik-Banking-Crime_Banking- Crisis_Banking-Fraud_Corruption-140106-593.html ix For further detailed discussion, see: 2014-08-31 Human Right Alert (NGO): Draft UPR Submission-United States (2014) "Large-scale fraud in T systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?", Appendix http://www.scribd.com/doc/238333015/ ; The Texas Penal Code 32.48, pertaining to "Simulating Legal Process" says: Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process 32.48. SMULATNG LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. (c) t is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating document (1) states that it is not legal process; or (2) purports to have been issued or authorized by a person or entity who did not have lawful authority to issue or authorize the document. (d) f it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the simulating document was filed with, presented to, or delivered to a clerk of a court or an employee of a clerk of a court created or established under the constitution or laws of this state, there is a rebuttable presumption that the document was delivered with the intent described by Subsection (a). (e) Except as provided by Subsection (f), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor. (f) f it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant has previously been convicted of a violation of this section, the offense is a state jail felony. Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, 3, eff. May 21, 1997. ;i 2011-08-11 Dave Warner, "Former judge sentenced to prison for "kids for cash" scheme", Reuter http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/11/us-crime-kidsforcash-idUSTRE77A6KG20110811 xii 2006-10-11 " Detainee treatment topic of conference", Stanford News http://news.stanford.edu/news/2006/october11/humanity-101106.html xiii 1997-12-00 US Department of Justice, Office of nspector General, December 1997 Special Report: CA Drug Trafficking to Los Angeles, California http://www.scribd.com/doc/29071814 xiv 2012-06-20 "Full coverage: ATF's Fast and Furious scandal" , Lo Angele Time http://www.latimes.com/nation/atf-fast-furious-sg-storygallery.html xv 2013-07-03 Christie Smythe, "HSBC Judge Approves $1.9B Drug-Money Laundering Accord ", Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-02/hsbc-judge-approves-1-9b-drug-money-laundering-accord.html ;+i 2013-06-20 Tom Blickman, "Deficiencies in financial oversight enable money laundering", Trannational $ntitute http://www.tni.org/article/deficiencies-financial-oversight-enable-money-laundering ;+ii 2011-11-27 "nternational banks have aided Mexican drug gangs", Lo Angele Time http<GGartiles1latimes1omG-.''Gno+G-2G/orl&Gla?*g?me;io?money?laun&ering?banks?-.''''-F ;+iii "Organized Crime", +N #ffice on ,rug and Crime https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/organized-crime/index.html ;i; For further detailed discussion, see: 2014-08-31 Human Right Alert (NGO): Draft UPR Submission-United States (2014) "Large-scale fraud in T systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?", Appendix http://www.scribd.com/doc/238333015/ ;; The author has no direct access to PACER at this time. The figure is based on the copy of the docket from the web site, linked blow. The listing of the docket entries, shown here, and the records linked to the entries in Dkt #1-5 are believed to be accurate copies of the same entries and records in the respective PACER docket sheet. http://ia600305.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.330523/gov.uscourts.nysd.330523.docket.html xxi "CVL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. " http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/JS044.pdf ;;ii 2010-11-07 US District Court, Southern District of New York: a) Local Rules, b) ECF Rules and nstructions, c) Attorney's ECF Dictionary http://www.scribd.com/doc/41549804/ xxiii 2001-03-00 "Strengthening Judicial ntegrity Against Corruption",+N $nternational Crime -revention Center http://www.scribd.com/doc/48103697/ ;;i+ 2006-07-19 "House Moves Toward mpeaching Judge Manuel Real", Metropolitan Ne(.%nterprie http://www.metnews.com/articles/2006/real071906.htm ;;+ 2008-02-00 US District Court Central District of California: General Order 08-02, Authorizing CM/ECF, Digital Authentication and Attestation in NEFs http://www.scribd.com/doc/27632471/ ;;+i 2010-01-21 Joseph Zernik, "Attorney Richard Fine - dissident's false hospitalization in Los Angeles County, California", #p%dNe('com http://www.opednews.com/articles/Attorney-Richard-Fine--di-by-Joseph-Zernik-100118-435.html xxvii 2012-01-11 n RE: R G (2:11-mc-00284) in the US District Court, Central District of California - minutes, orders, judgments issued with invalid NEFs are invalid court records http://www.scribd.com/doc/84376206/ ;;+iii Zernik, J.: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Simulated Litigation and Simulated Banking Regulation in the United States http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/ ;;i; Joseph Zernik, "Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis", /0th World Criminolog! Congre1 Kobe, Japan,2011 http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/ xxx 2010-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VRGNA PHLLPS, JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for nvestigation, mpeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate http://www.scribd.com/doc/44669382/ ;;;i 2010-12-08 Request No 1 for nvestigation, mpeachment of RUBY KRAJCK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct of Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation(1:09-cv-06829) http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/ ;;;ii 2011-01-10 Request No 1 for investigation/impeachment proceedings against US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJCK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/ ;;;iii 2010-12-19 Addendum to Request No 1 for nvestigation/impeachment of JUDGE RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJCK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct of Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/ xxxiv 2011-02-05 Request No 2 for mpeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJCK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/ xxxv For historical review see: Scott Messinger, "Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts", Federal *udicial Center (2002) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/ ;;;+i Joseph Zernik. "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation" ,ata Anal!tic, 2012 http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059 xxxviiFor further detailed discussion, see: 2014-08-31 Human Right Alert (NGO): Draft UPR Submission-United States (2014) "Large-scale fraud in T systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?", Appendix http://www.scribd.com/doc/238333015/
2012-05-31 Ombudsman of the Judiciary decision 88/12/Tel-Aviv District in the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" affair // החלטת נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים 88/12/מחוזי תל-אביב בפרשת "הפרוטוקולים המפוברקים" של השופטת ורדה אלשייך
2018-05-24 Refusal to accept repeat request to Central Election Committee Chair, Justice Hanan Melcer’s response on inquiry, asking him to perform his reporting duties// סירוב לקבל בקשה חוזרת לתשובת יו"ר ועדת הבחירות המרכזית, שופט בית המשפט העליון חנן מלצר על בקשה למילוי חובת הדיווח
0000-00-00 State of Israel v Ariel, Klass and Zernik (36318-08-19) Public Defender’s office false response on inquiry - undated, no reference number, no case number // מ"י נ אריאל קלס וצרניק (36318-08-19) - תשובה שקרית על פניה לסנגוריה הציבורית - ללא תאריך, ללא מספר אסמכתה, ללא מספר תיק
2018-11-08 Zernik, J. "Cyber & Law - Israel as a case study - presentation in Univ of Goettingen law school colloquium // סייבר ומשפט - ישראל כמקרה בוחן - מצגת בקולוקוויום בבי"ס למשפטים, אוניברסיטת גטינגן, גרמניה
2018-02-19 Central Election Committee: FOIA request (No 2/0219/18) - Supreme Court Justices, protocols, appointments // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (מס’ 2/0219/18) לגבי שופטי בית המשפט העליון, פרוטוקולים, מינויים
2017-10-22 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – failure of the Ministry of Interior to comply with FOIA, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – אי קיום חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים
2017-11-05 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – false and misleading Ministry of Interior FOIA response, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – תשובה שקרית ומטעה של משרד הפנים על בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע
2017-09-12 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה (מס’ ) על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-10-01 Zernik v State of Israel et al (7631/17) – criminal appeal – in the Supreme Court – Notice of Appeal and Appeal // צרניק נ מדינת ישראל ואח' (7631/17) – ערעור פלילי – בבית המשפט העליון – הודעת ערעור וערעור
2017-10-22 Request for compliance with FOIA by Ministry of Interior, in re: Public Committee for Review of Computerization of the Election System // בקשה לקיום הוראות חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים בנוגע לוועדה לבחינת מחשוב מערכת הבחירות
2017-09-12 Ministry of Interior: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // משרד הפנים: בקשה (מס’ )על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-09-05 FOIA Request (-2017) on Ministry of Justice, in re: Authority to sign decisions of Ombudsman of the Judiciary // בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (-2017) למשרד המשפטים לגבי סמכות חתימה על החלטות נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים
2017-09-06 National Cyber Security Authority: Inquiry regarding guiding and certification of government IT systems, security standards online publication // הרשות הלאומית להגנת הסייבר: פנייה לגבי הנחיה ואישור מערכות מידע ממשלתיות, פרסום ברשת בעניין תקני אבטחת מערכות מידע
2017-09-07 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Committee) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לוועדה)
2017-09-06 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Supreme Court) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לבית המשפט העליון)
2017-09-03 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee – protocols of the Tender Committee ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית - פרוטוקולים של ועדת המכרזים
United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine Company, 320 F.2d 509, 3rd Cir. (1963)