of Construction Projects www.pwc.com By: Syed Imtiaz Ahmed B.E. (Civil), CCSA, CRMA, CCP, CCA Senior Manager, Commercial Assurance, PwC, UAE Chairman, Construction Audit Subgroup, IIA, UAE Agenda 1 1. Ground Rules 2. Construction Project Stakeholders 3. Technical v/s Operational Audit of Construction projects 4. Reasons for auditing construction projects 5. Type & Scope of Construction Project Audit 6. Case studies 7. Surprise Quality and Safety Inspections 8. Value addition by Innovation 9. Questions 2 Ground Rules 3 The real life case studies presented are based on actual events but modified for confidentiality purposes Case studies are selected from presenters 29 years of work experience Mobiles on silent mode please Questions at the end of presentation or through email 4 Construction Project Stakeholders 5 I smell money The Contractor I am always right Third Parties What is your scope? Auditor 6 Technical v/s Operational Audit of Construction projects 7 Normal audit teams generally consist of internal auditors with a financial background Technical audit teams consist of Engineers, Quantity Surveyors, Planning Engineers, Contract Specialists, QA - QC Experts and also include internal auditors with financial background Normal audit teams verify general compliance to the policies and procedures Technical teams verify compliance to the contractual requirement - contracts, specifications, codes and standards Quality and EHS site visits can be conducted by technical auditors 8 Reasons for auditing construction projects 9 Top management is concerned about their exposure Construction projects are costly Delays and quality issues can result in brand erosion and lost market opportunity Provides a means of keeping projects on track, or gets them back on track quickly Provides independent assurance about project status not available elsewhere It saves 1% of project cost It returns 40 times audit cost 10 Type & Scope of Construction Project Audit 12 11 Project Development/Feasibility Master Plan & Design Brief Compliance to regulatory authority Type & conditions of contract Tender & Contract Value Engineering, Project Planning & Scheduling Contract Administration, Claim Management, Progress Payment Construction & Safety Method Statements Variation, Claims & Extension of Time Contracts Close out, Defect liability & maintenance Scope of Technical Audit Slide 1/2 12 Project QA/QC manual Project Quality Control Plan / Quality manual Project Quality Procedures Site inspection reports Inspection and test plan Test reports Non conformance report Material delivered/used and compliance to specification Safety Risk assessments and compliance to EHS Scope of Technical Audit Slide 2/2 13 Case study IIA UAE Regional Conference, March 2014 Tender 14 Scope added to attract more contractors and achieve competitive rates Deleted after a month Instruction issued after a month Work deleted preliminaries not recovered Awarded to single source based on per unit area 9 different types of buildings Contract drawings were available for 8 types Awarded single source, lump sum, per square meter basis Constructed area was less then calculated area 15 Case study Value Engineering 16 Alternate material approved for cost savings Bituminous membrane with protection board Replaced with cementatious water proofing material No test for Chloride and Sulphide resistance Method of construction and project cost Bridge redesign due to change in pier spacing Changed from Cast in situ to post tension Contractor offered 20 million savings Post tender value engineering, scope deleted, cost not adjusted 10 items deleted from scope Cost and quantity adjusted for 6 items 4 items no change, Project was lump sum 17 Case study Project Schedule 18 Acceleration not achieved but cost paid Project completion was moved forward for 3 months Works completed 2 months from the original completion date Acceleration cost paid in terms of full over time, cost of material, full equipment rent, additional material etc Extension of time approved, penalties not applied Contract was delayed , Scope reduced Contractors delays not considered Final result 5% penalty applied Method of construction changed for time saving Cast in situ to pre cast, no cast saving, only time saving Not considered in EOT assessment 19 Case study Scope Changes 20 Variation with additional preliminaries issued in re measurable contract Developer added parallel parking Works were within 20% (variation limit) Variation issued with prelims for road diversions, additional lighting etc. Variation issued for original work Contractor to select the method of reclamation to negate additional compaction Results were not satisfactory Contractor applied for variation for ground improvement works Ground improvement is not compaction, method use is Vibro compaction 21 Case study Final settlement 22 Loss of profit paid violating the contract clause 20% work deleted 17% new work added, No change in project time line Preambles No loss of profit will be payable on deleted works As built quantities not measured and reconciled Re measured contract, same buildings, different contractors Final as built quantities were different for both Client supplied material was more then installed Project completed with savings Item deleted cost paid, No negative variations issued Fire fighting system additional cost 23 Case study Quality 24 Non conformance issued and closed without action Panel design is not aesthetically matching with adjacent panels It is as per approved drawing Hence closed with out action NCR Corrective actions not agreed with Consultant Design and build project After repair consultant rejected No agreed time line for corrective action Material used was manufactured in China specified was from France 25 Surprise Quality and Safety Inspections 26 Honey comb 27 Asphalt without prime coat 28 Inspection at source 29 Value addition by Innovation Control self assessments Formalization of common contract conditions Bridging the gap Facilitate the lessons learned session 30 syed.imtiaz.ahmed@ae.pwc.com 052 918 1299, 02 694 6800 Senior Manager, Commercial Assurance, PwC, UAE Chairman, Construction Audit Subgroup, IIA, UAE Experts are at telephone length.. Thank You This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC, UAE, its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. 2014 PwC, UAE. All rights reserved. In this document, PwC refers to PwC, UAE which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity. 33