2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO) : UPR Submission - United States - 22nd Session - "Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?"
100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
150 vizualizări5 pagini
Executive Summary
Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights.
Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond.
Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts.
Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina).
Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups.
Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political
Titlu original
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Submission - United States - 22nd session - "Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - Unannounced regime change?"
Executive Summary
Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights.
Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond.
Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts.
Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina).
Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups.
Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political
100%(1)100% au considerat acest document util (1 vot)
150 vizualizări5 pagini
2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO) : UPR Submission - United States - 22nd Session - "Large-Scale Fraud in IT Systems of The US Courts - Unannounced Regime Change?"
Executive Summary
Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided or suspended, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution. At the same time, such IT systems provide unique evidence of systemic judicial corruption, fraud on the courts, and abuse of Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights.
Allegations: 1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively voided, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite; 5. Corruption of the US courts and the legal profession is a central cause of the current socio-economic crisis in the United States and beyond.
Evidence: IT system analysis documents: a) IT Systems were developed and implemented with no lawful authority; b) Identity of the servers of the US courts is unverified; c) No valid electronic signatures were implemented; d) Invalid, fraudulent authentication and service instruments and procedures were implemented (NEF/NDA); e) A “double books” system was implemented; f) Invalid authorities and permissions were implemented; g) The systems affect discrimination in access to the courts; h) Appearance of attorneys, who are not authorized as Counsel of Record, is enabled; i) Universal failure to docket summonses - a critical failure in integrity; j) Adulteration and deletion of court records; k) Inexplicable, unreasonable differences among the IT systems of the various courts.
Case studies document the employment of such systems in the conduct of simulated litigation affecting abuse of the rights of Liberty and property, as well as other Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights. Today, such corruption is particularly noted in cases, originating in corruption of judges and other government officers, and in fraud by the banking industry on individuals, on shareholders, on taxpayers, and on an entire nation (Argentina).
Conclusions: 1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. Such conduct amounts to Organized State-corporate Crime. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, particularly relative to serious violations of the Human Rights of the people of the US . 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the US, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial interest groups.
Recommendations: Emerging from current conditions would require a fundamental and comprehensive corrective process in the US at a time, when the political
PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel joseph.zernikhra!n"o.or" 2014-09-13 Human Right Alert (NGO): UPR Sumi!!i"n - Unite# State! - 22n# !e!!i"n $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* A++en#i,# $ile% &on&'rren(l) *i(h (he s'+,ission, in&l'%es expan%e% (ex(, -'ll size -i"'res, an% &ross!re-eren&es in (he +o%) o- (he (ex( (o (he re&or%s, as evi%en&e. The Appen%ix is also pos(e% online a(# h((p#..***.s&ri+%.&o,.%o&./301472/0. h((ps#..%rive."oo"le.&o,.-ile.%.0B3Aa/x45+,k6706893%a&,32:$;.e%i(<'sp=sharin" A. Human Rights Alert (NGO) The 2010 Human Rights Alert ["HRA"] submission for the UPR of the United States was inor!orated into the Professional Staff Re!ort with the note "orru!tion of the ourts and the legal !rofession and disrimination b" law enforement in #alifornia"$ The 201% HRA submission for the UPR of the State of &srael was inor!orated b" referene into the HR# Professional Staff Re!ort with the note 'la( of integrit" in the eletroni reord s"stems of the Su!reme #ourt) the distrit ourts and the detainees* ourts in &srael$+ &t is li(el" that the HRA re!orts are the first,e-er Human Rights re!orts that are foused on &T s"stem anal"sis and data mining$ B. Allegations .ide segments of the !eo!le of the United States toda" hold that the US #onstitution was -oided$ The im!lementation of in-alid fraudulent &T s"stems in the US ourts was a (e" e-ent in establishing urrent onditions$ The fraud inherent in the &T s"stems of the US ourts is not the t"!ial s!oradi orru!tion) whih an be found in an" /ustie s"stem at an" time to some degree or another$ &t is orru!tion) whih was entrall" im!lemented throughout the ourt s"stem$ 1. Specific allegations 1$ The &T s"stems of the US ourts enable the routine ondut of simulated 0sham1fa(e2) abusi-e litigation and the !ubliation of simulated /udiial reords) abusing the rights for 3ibert" and !ro!ert"4 suh ondut is !artiularl" notieable toda" in ases originating in orru!tion of go-ernment offiers or finanial institutions4 2$ Under suh irumstanes) the rule of law and the US #onstitution are effeti-el" -oided) and aess to the ourts is effeti-el" denied4 %) Suh onditions should be onsidered unannouned regime hange4 5$ Suh onditions amount to -iolation of an" artile of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) where integrit" of the ourts and the /ustie s"stem is a !rere6uisite4 7$ #orru!tion of the US ourts and the legal !rofession is a entral ause of the urrent soio,eonomi risis in the United States and be"ond$ 2. Simulated records simulated litigation Through the im!lementation and em!lo"ment of in-alid &T s"stems in the US ourts) the US ourts toda" issue and !ublish /udiial and lerial reords that are in-alid and -oid on their faes$ &n suh simulated) in-alid reords) US /udges abuse the #i-il) #onstitutional) and Human Rights$ .ith it) the ourts indue and1or e8tort om!liane with suh in-alid) simulated /udiial reords$ a) Definitions: "Simulated Litigation", "Simulated Court Record", "Fraud upon the court" - "Simulated 3itigation1Reords" , !ursuant to the Te8as Penal #ode 9%2$5:4 ";raud u!on the #ourt" , !ursuant to Bulloch v. United States) <=% ;$2d 1117) 1121 010th #ir$ 1>:72$ b) Judges are not coered b! immunit! in simulated litigation - the ondut of simulated litigation and the issuane of simulated /udiial reords are e8tra,/udiial ondut$ >',an 9i"h( Aler( ?85O@# AP9 B'+,ission ! Ani(e% B(a(es ! //n% session# $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* 1/5 Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik, PhD Date: 2014.09.13 23:49:15 +03'00' c) Simulated litigation should be deemed rac"eteering, or state-corporate organi#ed crime - !ursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organiations !ct 0US# 91>=12$ Suh ondut should also be re-iewed under the terms of the United "ations Convention against #ransnational Organied Crime 020002$ &n riminolog") suh onditions are onsidered "State,or!orate ?rgani@ed #rime"$ d) $utomated "%nde& of Judicial Corruption" - the simulated reords in the &T s"stems of the US ourts !ro-ide a uni6ue database for data mining) and enable automated stud" of orru!tion of the /udiiar"$ !. "#idence 1. $% s&stem anal&sis a) 'he s!stems (ere deeloped and implemented (ith no la(ful authorit! The new &T s"stems re!resent a sea,hange in ourt !roedures$ US #ongress wasn*t li(el" to onsent to enat suh !roedures) and the /udiiar" ated with no lawful authorit"$ ;ull doumentation of lawful s!eifiation) de-elo!ment management) and -alidation) ertified b" !ersons of ade6uate authorit") under aountabilit" to the legislature must be re6uired$ Pursuant to the fundamental !rini!le of Publiit" of the 3aw) suh &T s"stems must be as trans!arent to the !ubli as !ossible$ The ommon theme in &T s"stems of the US ourts is learA Bah and e-er" US ourt im!lemented and o!erates its loal -ariation of the &T s"stems) based on the ommon PA#BR and #C1B#; !latforms) in a manner that enables it to generate and !ublish online abusi-e /udiial and lerial reords) as well as ase do(ets) whih are not deemed -alid and effetual) !ursuant to the US law) or b" the res!eti-e ourts) but would a!!ear as -alid and effetual reords to the unwitting !arties and the !ubli at large$ b) 'he identit! of the serers, on (hich the records are published and from (hich the! are do(nloaded is unerified) c) %nalid implementation of electronic signatures Toda") all reords of the US distrit and a!!eals ourts are eletroni reords$ Howe-er) there no -alid) -isible eletroni signatures are to be found on an" suh reords$ The ourts use -arious forms of in-alid signaturesA Sanned images of hand,signatures) initials) 1s1) t"!ed names) or no signature at all$ The notion that a national !ro/et of suh so!e failed to im!lement -alid) !ublil" -isible eletroni signatures annot be reasonabl" deemed an o-ersight) or human error$ d) %nalid implementation of authentication and serice instruments and procedures *+,F-+D$) $ro, le-(# a) 8;$ *i(h C;le&(roni& Do&',en( B(a,psC ?re% -ra,es@, ABDD DA;D. ) 8;$, ,issin" (he C;le&(roni& Do&',en( B(a,pC, Dk( E60, Mandate of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, as %o&ke(e% in Fine v Sheriff - >a+eas Dorp's, ABDD DADD ?se&(ion D3a@. %) T*o PAD;9 %o&ke( en(ries in SEC v BAC ! +ankin" re"'la(ion 'n%er (he -inan&ial &risis, ABDD 8FBD. Jan'ar) 2/, /020 en(r) ?Dk( E73, Or%er@ is linke% (o an a&('al re&or%. Jan'ar) 20, /020 en(r) ?Dk( Enone, Gin'(es@ is no( linke% (o an) re&or%, an% (here-ore, s'&h C%o&ke( (ex( onl)C no(a(ion &o'l%nH( possi+l) +e a'(hen(i&a(e% +) an 8;$. The Jan'ar) 20, /020 (elephone hearin" an% i(s ,in'(es sho'l% +e %ee,e% si,'la(e% &o'r( hearin" an% si,'la(e% ,in'(es, like ,an) o(hers si,ilar en(ries in (he sa,e &o'r( &ase. ?se&(ion D/h@ #) Do&ke( en(r) in In RE: Ronald ottschal!, ABDD DADD, COr%er o- Dis+ar,en( ...%ele(e% -or (he -ollo*in" reason# 9epor(e% (ha( (he 8;$ *as "enera(e%.C This 'niI'e (ex( provi%e a--ir,a(ion +) Dhie- J'%"e o- (he AB Dis(ri&( Do'r( (ha( a re&or% *i(h no vali% 8;$ is a voi% j'%i&ial re&or%. Although ne-er lawfull" established) the US ourts im!lemented the DB;1DEA as authentiation instruments in #C1B#; in the distrit and a!!eals ourts) res!eti-el"$ The DB;1DEA substitutes the #ertifiate of Ser-ie and Dotie of Bntr" of Fudgment b" the #ler( of the #ourt$ The DB;1DEA is in-alid on its fae as an authentiation instrument$ &t fails to state the name and authorit" of an indi-idual) who issued it) fails to inlude the ertifiation statement "& the undersigned hereb" ertif"$$$") bears no -alid signature) not sent and deli-ered as a an aom!an"ing reord to the atual ourt reord) onl" a h"!erlin( is !ro-ided$ ;urthermore) the !ubli and pro se filers are denied aess the DB;1DEA$ A!!endi8 & !ro-ides detailed doumentation of numerous >',an 9i"h( Aler( ?85O@# AP9 B'+,ission ! Ani(e% B(a(es ! //n% session# $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* 2/5 ases) where -oid reords with in-alid DB;1DEA are !ublished in PA#BR do(ets$ B8tensi-e researh failed to diso-er a single "Dotie of Bntr" of Fudgment") a (e" Eue Proess reord) !resribed b" US law) sine the im!lementation of PA#BR and #C1B#;$ .ith it) the ourts of a!!eals ondut with no authorit" at all simulated a!!eals) ta(en from unertified /udgments of the distrit ourts$ f) %nalid implementation of authorities and permissions Under #C1B#;) unauthori@ed ourt em!lo"ees as well at attorne"s) routinel" enter reords and do(et notations b"!assing the authorit" of the #ler( of the #ourt$ g) Discrimination in access to the courts Pratiall" in all US distrit ourts) whih were e8amined) onl" attorne"s are !ermitted aess to #C1B#;$ Therefore) pro se filers and the !ubli at large are denied aess to DB;s1DEAs and annot distinguish between -alid and -oid ourt reords in the PA#BR do(ets$ Ser-ie on attorne"s is b" email) on !ro se filers , b" !a!er mail$ h) $ppearance of attorne!s, (ho are not authori#ed as Counsel of Record Cemorandum ?!inion of US Fudge Feff Gohm in the Case of Borro$er %arsle& 0setion #2e2 douments that a!!earane of unauthori@ed attorne"s with "no ommuniations with lients lause") has beome a routine fraud method of #ountr"wide ;inanial #or!oration in ourts aross the United States$ Similar fraud was !er!etrated b" attorne"s for #alifornia /udges in 'ine v Sheriff and (ernik v Connor et al) USE# #A#E 0setions #2a) #2f) res!eti-el"2$ h) .niersal failure to doc"et summonses) The issuane of -alid summonses) their e8eution) and their do(eting) !resribed b" law) is ritial for ommening -alid litigation and safeguard of integrit" of the ourts$ Re-iew of the US ourts from oast to oast shows uni-ersal) ine8!liable failure to do(et summonses in the PA#BR do(ets$ &n !arallel) in numerous ases in-alid summonses ha-e been diso-ered) inluding high !ubli !oli" signifiant ases) suh as S*C v Bank of !merica Corporation) USE# DHSE , (e" litigation under the finanial risis 0setion #2h2$ i) $dulterated and missing of court records &n -arious ases) (e" reords are deleted from the PA#BR do(ets of the US ourts$ #ommening reord 0Petition2 in 'ine v Sheriff USE# #A#E was adulterated$ Eeision in the Habeas #or!us !etition of Iuantanamo Ga" detainee was adulterated$ Fudgment reord in Citiens United is missing$ Cissing and adulterated ourt reords a ardinal sign of /udiial orru!tion$ $ro, le-(# a) B',,ons in SEC v Ban! of A"erica Corporation, ABDD 8FBD. The s',,ons *as no( %o&ke(e%, +'( *as %is&overe% (hro'"h a $ree%o, o- In-or,a(ion reI'es(. The s',,ons is 'nsi"ne%, an% -ails (o +ear (he seal o- (he &o'r(. I( %o&',en(s &oll'sion o- B;D, Bank o- A,eri&a an% AB &o'r( in (he &on%'&( si,'la(e% li(i"a(ion in a hi"h visi+ili() &ase, rela(e% (o +ankin" s'pervision. +@ $alse J'%",en( re&or% in Citi#ens United v FEC, BDOTAB. I( is a no(i&e -ro, (he BDOTAB &lerk re"ar%in" a((orne)s -ees. The J'%",en( re&or% is ,issin". /) 0$C,R and C1-,CF - inter-court sure! &ne8!liable differenes among the US distrit ourts$ ") %' s!stem of the .S Supreme Court The S#?TUS &T s"stems 0name un(nown2 undermine the foundation of the Rule of 3awA The s"stems enable the !ubliation of do(ets) /ournals) deisions) and /udgments b" S#?TUS !ersonnel of un(nown authorit"$ The data) found in the Fournals) Eo(ets) and Eeisions in inherentl" inonsistent and ontraditor"$ 2. !ase studies a-p A series of simulated ases) or ases of other t"!es of remar(able fraud and abuse in the US distrit ourt) US a!!eals ourts) S#?TUS) !artiularl" ases of unlawful de!ri-ation of 3ibert" and ases related to fraud b" finanial institutions under the urrent finanial risis$ >',an 9i"h( Aler( ?85O@# AP9 B'+,ission ! Ani(e% B(a(es ! //n% session# $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* 3/5 $ro, le-(# $M% Capital v Repu&lic of Ar'entina, US(C $)S( ?se&(ion D/k@# a) PAD;9 %o&ke( en(ries, Dk( E2!6 ! (he s',,ons *as no( %o&ke(e%. ) 8o(i&e o- Dase Assi"n,en( (o J'%"e 5riesa, Dk( E6 is 'nsi"ne%. As in all PAD;9 &ases, p'+li& a&&ess (o (he 8;$s ! a'(hen(i&a(ion re&or%s ! is %enie%. The &ase, *hi&h ,a) &a'se (he &ollapse o- (he Ar"en(inian e&ono,) is opine% -ra'% o- ,e%ieval s()le an% propor(ions. '. National authorities ci#il societ& organi(ations e)perts media All fail to !erform their dutiesA 1. Office of Attorne& General *S 'epartment of +ustice and ,B$- 2. Ban.ing Regulation- /. *S !ongress- 0. %he 1udiciar&- 2. %he legal profession- 3. ")perts- 4. !i#il societ& organi(ations- 5. 6edia. ". !ompliance 7ith rele#ant *S la7 1. Ha8eas !orpus Through the ondut of simulated re-iew) Habeas #or!us was in fat sus!ended$ 2. ,irst Amendment to the *S !onstitution9 the right to file papers in court Sus!ended$ /. ,irst Amendment to the *S !onstitution9 to right to inspect and to cop& court records Sus!ended$ 0. Rules "na8ling Act Jiolated through the im!lementation of fraudulent &T s"stems in the US ourts$ 2. ,ederal Rules of !i#il :rocedure 9duties of the cler. Jiolated through the im!lementation of fraudulent &T s"stems in the US ourts$ 3. Authentication and certification of 1udicial records legal process under the signature of the cler. and the Seal of the !ourt Joided in the fraudulent &T s"stems of the US ourts$ 4. "lectronic Signatures in Glo8al and National !ommerce Act (2;;;) and "9Go#ernment Act (2;;2) Do -alid eletroni signatures an be found in eletroni ourt reords$ ,. !ompliance 7ith rele#ant treaties and con#entions 1. Basel Accords on Ban.ing Super#ision ;ailure to establish effeti-e ban(ing su!er-ision$ 2. Hague Apostille %reat& (1<31) &gnored) as a result of the failure to authentiate ourt reords$ /. *nited Nations !on#ention against %ransnational Organi(ed !rime &gnored) through deriminali@ation of mone" laundering) and other riminalit" in the ban(ing s"stem) !ersons) firearms smuggling b" US agenies$ G. Retaliation against anti91udicial corruption acti#ists -r"m le&t: a@ An(i!j'%i&ial &orr'p(ion a&(ivis(, +lo""er 9o"er Bh'ler, a-(er +ein" +ea(en an% -alsel) i,prisone% in Ala+a,a, /023. +@ An(i!j'%i&ial &orr'p(ion a&(ivis(, -or,er AB prose&'(or 9i&har% $ine, %'rin" his /000!20 -alse i,prison,en( in >',an 9i"h( Aler( ?85O@# AP9 B'+,ission ! Ani(e% B(a(es ! //n% session# $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* 4/5 soli(ar) &on-ine,en(, Jos An"eles, Dali-ornia. &@ Davi% B&hie%, an(i!j'%i&ial &orr'p(ion a&(ivis(, *as jaile% -or 30 %a)s -or silen(l) o+servin" (he &o'r(. %@ Dr Joseph Zernik, a'(hor o- ins(an( s'+,ission, shor(l) +e-ore es&apin" (he AB in April /020, so'"h( +) AB Garshals CThrea( Ani(C, in &onj'n&(ion *i(h s'+,i((in" (he /020 AP9 repor(. 9e(alia(ion +) (he AB an% Israeli "overn,en(s &on(in'e% in /023, reI'irin" (*i&e reI'es(in" (he pro(e&(ion o- (he $e%eral 5er,an "overn,en(. 1. General Anti,/udiial orru!tion ati-ists are targeted for !artiularl" harsh retaliation$ 2. Retaliation against 'r +oseph =erni. 9 author of instant su8mission Retaliation in the US) under the false laim of "Threat" to the US ourts) and retaliation in &srael though ta(ing of ban( de!osits) following the diso-er") arhi-ing) and dissemination of e-idene of /udiial fraud in the US and in &srael as !art of the 2010 and 201% UPR re!orts) res!eti-el"$ H. Historical perspecti#e 9 Ro88er Baron Re#i#al "ra. #urrent onditions in the US resemble in numerous as!ets onditions) whih !re-ailed a entur" ago and whih led to the Ireat Ee!ression$ $. !onclusions 1$ Through the im!lementation and o!eration of in-alid) fraudulent &T s"stems) the US ourts toda" routinel" ondut of simulated litigation) abuse the libert" and !ro!ert" of indi-iduals) and !lae the ban(s abo-e the law$ Suh ondut amounts to ?rgani@ed State,or!orate #rime$ 2$ Suh ondut amounts to serious -iolation of fundamental Human Rights of the !eo!le of the United States$ %$ Suh ondut is also entral to the urrent soio,eonomi risis) failing ban(ing regulation) and the ';orelosure #risis+) whih resulted in -ast inrease in !o-ert" and homelessness in the United States and undermined the US middle,lass$ 5$ The -alidit" of an" legal and /udiial reords) originating in the United States) and the -alidit" of an" litigation in the US ourts should be onsidered dubious$ 7$ The international ommunit" should reassess the nature of the urrent regime in the United States) and an" laim that its foreign !oli" is dri-en b" Human Rights interests$ =$ Bfforts to restore the US #onstitution and the rule of law in the US are li(el" be !rotrated and meet star( resistane b" !owerful US seurit") legal) and finanial interest grou!s$ Do orreti-e !roess is li(el" to ommene) unless onditions further deteriorate) leading to wides!read i-il unrest$ +. Recommendations 1$ The large,sale fraud in the US ourts) whih in fat im!liates eah and e-er" US sitting /udge) would li(el" re6uire an a!!roah similar to a Truth and Reoniliation #ommission) and1or a Seond #onstitutional #on-ention$ 2$ Eue to the entral role of the Administrati-e ?ffie of the US #ourts in im!lementing the fraudulent &T s"stems of the US ourts) the ?ffie should be restrutured or losed$ %$ Ceasures) similar to those ta(en a entur" ago under similar irumstanes through the Salar& !ct 01>1>2) whih !laed the ler(s of the US ourts under the diret authorit" of the Attorne" Ieneral) should be onsidered$ 5$ US legal and om!uting e8!erts should be engaged in an initiati-e to restore the integrit" of the &T s"stems of the US ourts) under aountabilit" to the US #ongress) with the goal of ma(ing suh s"stem as trans!arent as !ossible to the !ubli at large$ 7$ &n nations) where the se!aration of branhes of go-ernment is established b" law) the ourts must not be !ermitted to de-elo! and im!lement the ourts* &T s"stems$ =$ Human Rights and internet ati-ists must (ee! a wathful e"e on the -alidit" and integrit" of &T s"stems of the ourts and !risons Se!tember 1%) 2015 Fose!h Kerni() PhE) Human Rights Alert (NGO) Occup&%>? >',an 9i"h( Aler( ?85O@# AP9 B'+,ission ! Ani(e% B(a(es ! //n% session# $arge-!%ale &rau# in '( !)!tem! "& the US %"urt! - Unann"un%e# regime %hange* 5/5
0000-00-00 State of Israel v Ariel, Klass and Zernik (36318-08-19) Public Defender’s office false response on inquiry - undated, no reference number, no case number // מ"י נ אריאל קלס וצרניק (36318-08-19) - תשובה שקרית על פניה לסנגוריה הציבורית - ללא תאריך, ללא מספר אסמכתה, ללא מספר תיק
2012-05-31 Ombudsman of the Judiciary decision 88/12/Tel-Aviv District in the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" affair // החלטת נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים 88/12/מחוזי תל-אביב בפרשת "הפרוטוקולים המפוברקים" של השופטת ורדה אלשייך
2017-10-01 Zernik v State of Israel et al (7631/17) – criminal appeal – in the Supreme Court – Notice of Appeal and Appeal // צרניק נ מדינת ישראל ואח' (7631/17) – ערעור פלילי – בבית המשפט העליון – הודעת ערעור וערעור
2017-10-22 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – failure of the Ministry of Interior to comply with FOIA, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – אי קיום חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים
2017-10-22 Request for compliance with FOIA by Ministry of Interior, in re: Public Committee for Review of Computerization of the Election System // בקשה לקיום הוראות חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים בנוגע לוועדה לבחינת מחשוב מערכת הבחירות
2017-09-06 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Supreme Court) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לבית המשפט העליון)
2017-09-12 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה (מס’ ) על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-09-03 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee – protocols of the Tender Committee ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית - פרוטוקולים של ועדת המכרזים
2017-09-05 FOIA Request (-2017) on Ministry of Justice, in re: Authority to sign decisions of Ombudsman of the Judiciary // בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (-2017) למשרד המשפטים לגבי סמכות חתימה על החלטות נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים
2017-08-29 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee – compliance with Israeli Standard IS 27001 – Information Technologies – security techniques ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית - עמידה בתקן ישראלי ת.י. 27001 - טכנולוגיית המידע – טכניקות אבטחה
2017-05-03 Request for a valid Ministry of Justice FOIA response (90/17): E-signatures in Net-HaMishpat, “Israel Courts Authority” as a certifying authority pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act (2001) // בקשה לתשובה תקינה של משרד המשפטים על פי חוק חופש המידע (90/17): חתימות אלקטרוניות בנט-המשפט, “Israel Courts Authority” - כמאשר על פי חוק החתימה האלקטרונית (2001)