Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A. A. Soares,
J. Anacleto,
,
L. Caramelo,
J. M. Ferreira,
and R. P. Chhabra*
,
Departamento de F sica, UniVersidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Apartado 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real,
Portugal, IFIMUP and INsInstitute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Departamento de F sica da
Faculdade de Ciencias da UniVersidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal, and
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India 208016
The heat transfer characteristics from a circular cylinder immersed in power law uids have been studied in
the mixed convection regime when the imposed ow is oriented normal to the direction of gravity. The
continuity, momentum, and thermal energy equations have been solved numerically using a second-order
nite difference method to obtain the streamline, surface viscosity, and vorticity patterns, to map the temperature
eld near the cylinder and to determine the local and surface-averaged values of the Nusselt number. Overall,
mixed convection distorts streamline and isotherm patterns and increases the drag coefcient as well as the
rate of heat transfer from the circular cylinder. New results showing the complex dependence of all these
parameters on power law index (n ) 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.6), Prandtl number () 1,100), Reynolds number (1-30),
and the Richardson number (0, 1, and 3) are presented herein. Over this range of conditions, the ow is
assumed to be steady, as is the case for Newtonian uids.
1. Introduction
Due to its fundamental and pragmatic signicance, momen-
tum and heat transfer characteristics of a circular cylinder
immersed in moving uids have been studied extensively for
more than 100 years. Typical examples where this type of ow
occurs include tubular and pin-type heat exchangers, membrane
modules for separation, and use of bluff-bodies as ow dividers
in polymer processing and in thermal treatment of foodstuffs.
Also, the recent exponential growth in the performance of
modern electronic equipment, and thus increased power con-
sumption and heat generation, has provided impetus for renewed
interest in developing methods of enhancing the rate of heat
removal from such equipment. Consequently, a signicant body
of information is now available pertaining to various aspects
of the ow and heat transfer from a cylinder in Newtonian uids
like air and water. It is, however, fair to say that the ow
phenomena (drag and lift coefcients and wake characteristics,
for instance) have been studied much more extensively than
the corresponding heat transfer phenomena. Within the context
of heat transfer, indeed very limited information is available
on mixed convection from a cylinder, even in Newtonian
uids.
1,2
Sufce it to say that adequate information is now
available on the prediction of engineering design parameters
over a wide range of interest.
In most practical situations, free convection, how so ever
small, is always present and thus heat transfer occurs in the
mixed convection regime. In a given situation, the importance
of mixed convection is gauged by the value of the so-called
Richardson number, Ri, which is dened as the ratio of the
Grashof number to the square of the Reynolds number. Thus,
a small value of the Richardson number (Ri f0) indicates that
heat transfer occurs primarily by forced convection or, con-
versely, Ri O(1) corresponds to the case when the imposed
velocity and that induced by buoyancy are of comparable
magnitudes. Further complications arise depending upon the
orientation of the cylinder with respect to the direction of ow.
Thus, for instance, when the imposed ow is upward over a
heated cylinder, the rate of heat transfer is enhanced due to the
aiding buoyancy whereas the rate of heat transfer will deteriorate
in case of the downward ow over a heated cylinder (opposing
ow). Similarly, there are situations when the buoyancy induced
velocity is oriented normal to the imposed ow, thereby resulting
in the so-called crossow conguration. The present work is
concerned with the crossow conguration. However, a terse
review of the previous literature is instructive prior to the
presentation of the present study.
As noted earlier, the literature is limited on mixed convection
from a circular cylinder even in Newtonian uids like air and
water.
3-6
Chang and Sa
7
examined numerically the effects of
mixed convection heat transfer on vortex shedding in the near
wake of a heated/cooled circular cylinder, and their ndings
are consistent with the experimental results of Noto et al.
8
and
the subsequent numerical study of Hatanaka and Kawahara.
9
The inuence of buoyancy on heat transfer and wake structure
at low Reynolds numbers (Re ) 20-40) has been investigated
numerically by Patnaik et al.
10
for a circular cylinder placed in
a vertical stream. Kieft et al.
11
have studied the effect of mixed
convection from a heated cylinder in horizontal crossow
conguration and found that this conguration leads to asym-
metrical ow patterns. More recently, the effects of mixed
convection on the wake instability of a heated cylinder in
contraow have been investigated experimentally
12
and numeri-
cally.
13
It is thus abundantly clear that, over the years, mixed
convection from a heated circular cylinder to Newtonian uids
has attracted a fair bit of attention from the experimental,
analytical, and numerical standpoints, e.g., see refs 1, 2, and
14 and references therein, albeit most of these studies relate to
air as the working uid, i.e., Pr ) 0.7. Furthermore, an
examination of these survey articles shows that buoyancy forces
enhance the heat transfer rate when they aid the forced ow
and decrease the same when they oppose it. Such aiding and
opposing ow conditions have received a great deal of attention
(e.g., see refs 1 and 2). In contrast, limited work has been
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chhabra@
iitk.ac.in.
and T
, respectively. The
imposed ow is assumed to be normal to the direction of gravity.
The effect of temperature variation on thermophysical uid
properties (density F, specic heat at constant pressure c
p
,
thermal conductivity k, and power law parameters K and n) is
considered negligible except for the body force term in the
momentum equation (Boussinesq approximation). Due to the
innite length of the cylinder axis along the z-direction, the ow
is two-dimensional, i.e., no ow variable depends upon the z
coordinate and thus V
z
) 0. The relevant governing equations
(continuity, momentum, and thermal energy) can be expressed
in their dimensionless form in terms of the polar coordinates
(, ) with ) ln(r/a), (e.g., see ref 26) where a is the radius
of cylinder, giving
1
e
(
e
)
-
(
+
)
)0 (1)
-component
-
(
+
)(
2
+
+
)
)
-
1
2
p
+
Gr
2Re
2
T sin -
2
n
Re
[
e
-
(e
rr
) +
-
]
(2a)
Figure 1. Real (x, y) and computational (, ) plane. Variables include gravitational acceleration (g), the free stream uid temperature (T
), and uniform
approach velocity (U
).
Table 1. Comparison of Present Results with Literature Values of
Surface Averaged Nusselt Number (Nu) for Newtonian Fluids (n )
1), for Prandtl Number Pr ) 0.7
Nu
Re Ri Hatton et al.
3,a
Badr
5
Chen et al.
34
present
1 0.0 0.965 0.800 0.95
1.0 1.04 0.865 0.97
2.0 1.088 0.902 1.01
4.0 1.149 0.955 1.10
5 0.0 1.562 1.45 1.48
1.2 1.679 1.51 1.53
2.4 1.750 1.65 1.60
4.0 1.821 1.82 1.70
20 0.0 2.548 2.54 2.5806 2.43
1.25 2.698 2.65 2.690 2.57
2.5 2.795 2.85 2.911 2.67
5.0 2.939 3.10 3.240 3.01
40 0.0 3.318 3.48 3.470 3.20
0.25 3.364 3.49 3.481 3.21
2.0 3.552 3.76 3.780 3.57
4.0 3.701 4.17 4.228 3.84
a
Experimental correlation from ref 3.
8220 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009
-component
-
2
+
)
+
(
+
)
2
)-
1
2
p
+
Gr
2Re
2
T cos -
2
n
Re
[
e
-2
(e
2
r
) +
]
(2b)
energy equation
2
T
2
+
2
T
2
-
T
(
2 +
e
RePr
2
)
+
T
(
e
RePr
2
(
+
)
)
+T
(
1 +
e
RePr
2
)
)0 (3)
where the stream function , vorticity , and pressure p have
been scaled using e
a, e
-
U
/a, and U
2
F/2, respectively. The
components of the extra stress tensor
ij
are scaled using K(U
/
a)
n
. The thermal boundary condition at ) 0 is the constant
temperature (T
s
) condition, and consequently, the temperature
T is scaled as e
-
/(T
s
- T
2-n
K
(4)
where K denotes the power law consistency index and n is the
power law index. The power law model predicts shear-thinning
behavior for n < 1 and shear-thickening for n > 1. Evidently,
n ) 1 corresponds to the standard Newtonian uid behavior.
The Prandtl number is dened as
Pr )
c
p
K
k
(
U
2a
)
n-1
(5)
The Grashof number is dened as
Gr )
F
2
g(T
s
-T
)(2a)
2n+1
K
2
U
2(n-1)
(6)
where g is the gravitational acceleration and is the
coefcient of volumetric expansion of the power law uid.
The dimensionless components of the extra stress tensor
for a power law uid are written as
ij
)-
ij
(7)
where is the dimensionless viscosity and
ij
are the dimension-
less components of the rate-of-deformation tensor.
The equation for the dimensionless power law viscosity is
)I
2
(n-1)/2
(8)
where I
2
is the dimensionless second invariant of the rate-of-
deformation tensor given as follows:
I
2
)e
-2
[(
-
2
+
2 )
2
+4
(
2
)
2
]
(9)
The vorticity in its scaled form is given as follows:
2
+
2
+2
++)0 (10)
Eliminating the pressure in eqs 2a and 2b by the method of
cross-differentiation and introducing the vorticity , with some
rearrangement, leads to
2
+
2 )
+2
+2
+)F+M (11a)
where
)
- -
Re e
2
n+1
(11b)
)
+
Re e
2
n+1 (
+
)
(11c)
)-2
+ +
Re e
2
n
(11d)
F)
(
-
2
+
2 )(
2
-
2
+2
)
-
4
2
-
2
)
(11e)
M)
Gr
2
n+1
Re
e
[
T
sin -
(
T
-T
)
cos
]
(11f)
Due to the two-dimensional nature of the ow here (xy
plane) and since the oncoming ow is aligned with the x
direction, we need only consider the region x
2
+ y
2
g 1.
Thus, the corresponding region in the (, ) plane is dened
by g 0 and 0 e e 2 (Figure 1). It needs to be
emphasized here that the viscous dissipation term has been
neglected in the energy equation used here because for the
range of conditions of 1 e Re e 30 and 0 e Ri e 3, the
effective viscosity and/or shear rate close to the surface
Table 2. Effect of the Richardson Number on the Drag Coefcient (C
d
)
Pr ) 1 Pr ) 100
Ri Re ) 1 Re ) 5 Re ) 10 Re ) 20 Re ) 30 Re ) 1 Re ) 5 Re ) 10 Re ) 20 Re ) 30
n ) 0.8 n ) 0.8
0 12.87 4.26 2.83 2.01 1.67 12.87 4.26 2.85 2.01 1.67
1 12.95 4.66 3.21 2.34 1.97 12.86 4.34 2.93 2.04 1.69
3 14.02 4.89 3.95 3.33 2.81 13.39 4.62 3.10 2.19 1.83
n ) 1.0 n ) 1.0
0 10.45 3.93 2.76 1.99 1.66 10.45 3.93 2.76 1.99 1.66
1 10.86 4.34 3.10 2.33 1.98 10.42 4.00 2.82 2.02 1.69
3 13.19 5.14 4.23 3.06 3.14 10.80 4.20 2.98 2.15 1.81
n ) 1.6 n ) 1.6
0 7.43 3.70 2.74 2.14 1.86 7.43 3.70 2.74 2.14 1.86
1 8.06 4.35 3.27 2.58 2.29 7.44 3.73 2.78 2.17 1.89
3 13.30 7.72 4.17 4.02 3.65 8.51 3.98 2.93 2.28 1.99
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009 8221
cylinder is not expected to be excessively high. Similarly,
the assumption that the ow remains 2D is probably a
reasonable approximation under such conditions. The mo-
mentum and energy equations are coupled through eq. 11f,
which incorporates the buoyant forces in the present problem.
The realistic physical boundary conditions for this type of
ow are expressed as follows: On the cylinder surface, i.e. at
) 0, the usual no-slip condition is applied, i.e.
)0 (12a)
which together with eq 10 gives
)0 and )-
2
(12b)
The isothermal boundary condition at the surface of the solid
cylinder is given by
T )1 (12c)
Far away from the cylinder surface, for
) 4, we use the
asymptotic approximation for stream function and vorticity given
by Chhabra et al.
21
sin() +
C
d
2
e
-
(
-erf(Q)
)
(12d)
-
C
d
ReI
2
(1-n)2
2
n+1
Qe
-Q
2
(12e)
where C
d
is the drag coefcient,
Q)e
/2
Re
2
n
I
2
(1-n)4
sin
(
2
)
(12f)
and erf(Q) is the standard error function.
The far away stream temperature boundary conditions are
written as
T )0 and
T
)0 (12g)
It needs to be emphasized here that the aforementioned
boundary condition of a constant temperature at the far eld
(T/ ) 0) does not depend on the type of uid and is therefore
valid for both Newtonian and non-Newtonian conditions. It is,
however, appropriate to mention here that, although the vorticity
and stream function boundary conditions usually applied in the
far-eld mimic the well-known asymptotic solution for the
Newtonian case, the non-Newtonian viscosity value was
incorporated
21,26
in the aforementioned solution with the aim
of extending its validity to non-Newtonian uids. In terms of
the velocity boundary conditions, there is no ambiguity as the
free stream velocity condition is valid for any type of uid.
However, in developing the corresponding boundary conditions
in terms of vorticity and stream function, any possible loss of
accuracy in such far-eld asymptotic solution for non-Newtonian
uids will become less signicant as one approaches the surface
of the cylinder where the no-slip boundary condition is clearly
valid for both Newtonian and non-Newtonian conditions.
Figure 2. Effect of Richardson number Ri on the streamline patterns for Re ) 1 and Pr ) 1 and 100 at different values of n (ow direction ) left to right).
8222 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009
Therefore, the far eld boundary conditions for power law uids
developed in our previous works
21,26
are believed to be quite
adequate for this purpose. The fact that the use of this boundary
condition led to reliable values of drag coefcient and Nusselt
number (for forced convection case) inspires condence in the
use of these conditions in the present case also.
The coupled set of elliptic governing equations given by eqs
3, 10, and 11a-11f together with the corresponding boundary
conditions (eqs 12a-12g), have been discretized using the nite
difference method. The resulting system of algebraic equations
has been solved using an iterative Gauss Seidel relaxation
method (e.g., see refs 21 and 26). Once the values of , , and
T are computed in the ow domain 0 e e 4 and 0 e e 2,
the local Nusselt number Nu() and average Nusselt number
Nu, can be determined using the following expressions: The
local Nusselt number at a point on the surface of the isothermal
cylinder is dened by
Nu() )
h(2a)
k
)-2
(
T
-T
)
)0
(13)
The surface averaged Nusselt number is given by
Nu )
1
2
0
2
Nu() d (14)
Thus, in summary, once the values of the stream function,
vorticity, and temperature elds are known, these can be
postprocessed to obtain the values of drag coefcient, local and
surface-averaged Nusselt numbers as functions of the physical
(n) and kinematic variables (Re, Ri, Pr). These results elucidate
the interplay between the uid rheology and the characteristic
conditions of ow when the imposed velocity is oriented normal
to the direction of gravity vector.
3. Numerical Method
The nite difference method with a second order upwind
differencing scheme was applied to the convective terms of
temperature and vorticity, as developed in previous studies (e.g.,
see refs 21 and 26), has been used here to discretize and solve
the set of coupled equations formed by the governing stream
function, vorticity and energy eqs 10, 11a-11f, and 3, respec-
tively, together with the power law constitutive relationship (eq
8) and the boundary conditions outlined in eqs 12a-12g. The
numerical solutions were obtained for the computational domain
shown in Figure 1. For an (N +1) (M + 1) computational
mesh, the spacing in the and directions are
/N and 2/M,
respectively.
All results reported herein have been checked for grid
independence. In general, it is somewhat easier to meet the
convergence criterion for shear-thickening uids (n > 1) than
that for shear-thinning uids (n < 1), although in both cases
the nonlinearity of the system of equations increases as the value
of the power law index deviates increasingly from unity. This
makes convergence for the governing equations difcult for
small and high values of the power law index. In addition, for
Ri *0, the difculty to meet the convergence criterion increases
as the value of Pr decreases. The steady values of , , and T
as function of and were obtained using the Gauss Seidel
Figure 3. Effect of Richardson number Ri on the streamline patterns for Re ) 30 and Pr ) 1 and 100 at different values of n (ow direction ) left to right).
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009 8223
relaxation iterative algorithm.
21,26
The solutions of the eld
equations were used to calculate the Nusselt numbers via the
use of eqs 13 and 14. To obtain convergence, it was also
necessary to apply an under-relaxation factor between 0.5 and
1 to the vorticity and temperature variables. The iteration
procedure was repeated until the variation of Nu per iteration
was less than a preset value of 10
-7
. The outer boundary was
positioned at
)(2a)
2n+1
)/(K
2
U
2(n-1)
) (-)
h ) heat transfer coefcient, (W/(m
2
K))
H ) distance from the external boundary to the cylinder surface
(m)
g ) gravitational acceleration (m/s
2
)
I
2
) dimensionless second invariant of the rate-of-deformation
tensor (-)
K ) power law consistency index, (Pa s
n
)
k ) thermal conductivity of the uid, (W/(m K))
M ) dimensionless function, eq 11f
n ) power law index (-)
Nu ) average Nusselt number (-)
Nu() ) local Nusselt number (-)
p ) dimensionless pressure (-)
Pe ) Peclet number (-)
Pr ) Prandtl number (-)
r ) cylindrical coordinate (m)
Re ) Reynolds number, (F(2a)
n
U
2-n
/K) (-)
Ri ) Richardson number (Gr/Re
2
) (-)
U
ij
) components of rate-of-deformation tensor, (1/s)
ij
) dimensionless components of extra stress tensor (-)
Subscripts
) angular component
r ) radial component
Literature Cited
(1) Zdravkovich, M. M. Flow around circular cylinders: Fundamentals;
Oxford University Press: Oxford, U. K., 1997; Vol. 1.
(2) Zdravkovich, M. M. Flow around circular cylinders: Applications;
Oxford University Press: Oxford, U. K., 2003; Vol. 2.
(3) Hatton, A. P.; James, D. D.; Swire, H. V. Combined forced and
natural convection with low-speed air ow over horizontal cylinders. J.
Fluid Mech. 1970, 42, 1731.
(4) Badr, H. M. A theoretical study of laminar mixed convection from
a horizontal cylinder in a cross stream. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1983,
26, 639653.
(5) Badr, H. M. Laminar combined convection from a horizontal cylinder
in cross stream. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1984, 27, 1527.
(6) Ahmad, R. A.; Qureshi, Z. H. Laminar mixed convection from a
uniform heat ux horizontal cylinder in a crossow. J. Thermophys. Heat
Transfer 1992, 6, 277287.
(7) Chang, K.-S.; Sa, J.-Y. The effect of buoyancy on vortex shedding
in the near wake of a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 1990, 220, 253
266.
(8) Noto, K.; Ishida, H.; Matsumoto, R. A breakdown of the Karman
vortex street due to the natural convection. Flow Visualization III; Springer:
New York, 1985; pp 348-352.
(9) Hatanaka, K.; Kawahara, M. A numerical study of vortex shedding
around a heated/cooled circular cylinder by the three-step Taylor-Galerkin
method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 1995, 21, 857867.
(10) Patnaik, B. S. V.; Narayana, P. S. A.; Seetharamu, K. N. Numerical
simulation of vortex shedding past a circular cylinder under the inuence
of buoyancy. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1999, 42, 34953507.
(11) Kieft, R. N.; Rindt, C. C. M.; Steenhoven, A. A. V. The wake
behaviour behind a heated horizontal cylinder. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 1999,
19, 183193.
(12) Hu, H.; Kochesfahani M. The wake behind a heated cylinder in
forced and mixed convection regimes. 2005 ASME Summer Heat Transfer
Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
(13) Khyati, B. V.; Hui, H.; Wang, Z. J. Numerical investigation of
effect of buoyancy on the wake instability of a heated cylinder in contra
ow. AIAA 2007, 0801, 119.
8230 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009
(14) Zukaukas, A.; Zingza A. Heat Transfer of Cylinder in Cross Flow;
Hemisphere: Washington, D.C., 1985.
(15) Nazar, R.; Amin, N.; Pop, I. Mixed convection boundary-layer ow
from a horizontal circular cylinder with a constant surface heat ux. Heat
Mass Transfer 2004, 40, 219227.
(16) Chhabra, R. P.; Richardson, J. F. Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied
Rheology, 2nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, U. K., 2008.
(17) Kinloch, I. A.; Roberts, S. A.; Windle, A. H. A rheological study
of concentrated aqueous nanotube dispersions. Polymer 2002, 43, 7483
7491.
(18) Ding, Y.; Alias, H.; Wen, D.; Williams, R. A. Heat transfer of
aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (CNT nanouids). Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer 2006, 49, 240250.
(19) Tanner, R. I. Stokes paradox for power -law uids around a cylinder.
J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech. 1993, 50, 217224.
(20) D Alessio, S. J. D.; Pascal, J. P. Steady ow of a power law uid
past a cylinder. Acta Mech. 1996, 117, 87100.
(21) Chhabra, R. P.; Soares, A. A.; Ferreira, J. M. Steady non-Newtonian
ow past a circular cylinder: a numerical study. Acta Mech. 2004, 172,
116.
(22) Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Steady ow of power
law uids across a circular cylinder. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 84, 115.
(23) Sivakumar, P.; Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P. Effect of power law
index on critical parameters for power law ow across an unconned circular
cylinder. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 60356046.
(24) Khan, W. A.; Culham, J. R.; Yovanovich, M. M. Fluid ow and
heat transfer in power law uids across circular cylinders-analytical study.
J. Heat Transfer 2006, 128, 870878.
(25) Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Two-dimensional steady
Poiseuille ow of power law uids across a circular cylinder in a plane
conned channel:wall effects and drag coefcients. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2007, 46, 38203840.
(26) Soares, A. A.; Ferreira, J. M.; Chhabra, R. P. Flow and forced
convection heat transfer in cross ow of non-Newtonian uids over a circular
cylinder. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 58155827.
(27) Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Steady forced convection
heat transfer from a heated cylinder to power law uids. Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer 2007, 50, 977990.
(28) Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Effect of blockage on
heat transfer from a cylinder to power law uids. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007,
62, 47294741.
(29) Sivakumar, P.; Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P. Steady ow of power
law uids across an unconned elliptical cylinder. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007,
62, 16821702.
(30) Bharti, R. P.; Sivakumar, P.; Chhabra, R. P. Forced convection
heat transfer from an elliptical cylinder to power law uids. Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer 2008, 51, 18381853.
(31) Dhiman, A. K.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Heat transfer to power
law uids from a heated square cylinder. Numerical Heat Transfer 2007,
52, 185201.
(32) Dhiman, A. K.; Anjaiah, N.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Mixed
convection from a heated square cylinder to Newtonian and power law
uids. J. Fluids Eng. 2007, 129, 506513.
(33) Dhiman, A. K.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Steady mixed
convection from a conned square cylinder. Int. Commun. Heat Mass
Transfer 2008, 35, 4755.
(34) Chen, C.-K.; Yang, Y.-T.; Wu, S.-R. Laminar mixed convection
from a circular cylinder using a body-tted coordinate system. J. Thermo-
phys. Heat Transfer 1994, 8, 695701.
(35) Bharti, R. P.; Chhabra, R. P.; Eswaran, V. Numerical study of the
steady forced convection heat transfer from an unconned circular cylinder.
Heat Mass Transfer 2007, 43, 639648.
(36) Roache, P. J. Verication and Validation in computational Science
and Engineering; Hermosa Publishers: Albuquerque, NM, 1998.
(37) Chhabra, R. P. Bubbles, drops and particles in non-Newtonian
uids, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
(38) Coelho, P. M.; Pinho, F. T. Vortex shedding in cylinder ow of
shear-thinning uids. II. Flow characteristics. J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech.
2003, 110, 177193.
(39) Sun, K. H.; Pyle, D. L.; Fitt, A. D.; Please, C. P.; Baines, M. J.;
Hall-Taylor, N. Numerical study of 2D heat transfer in a scraped surface
heat exchanger. Comput. Fluids 2004, 33, 869880.
(40) Kreith, F. The CRC Handbook of Thermal Engineering; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
ReceiVed for reView August 1, 2008
ReVised manuscript receiVed September 23, 2008
Accepted September 24, 2008
IE801187K
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 48, No. 17, 2009 8231