0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
48 vizualizări1 pagină
Shoreline engineers and other shoreline stakeholders want proof that innovative, ecologically beneficial shoreline techniques are as effective as traditional shoreline protection methods. The Demonstration Site Network selects examples and disseminates this information. Case studies, posted online at hrnerr.org, provide a virtual tour of constructed site over the 150-mile length of the Hudson Estuary. This network of sites demonstrates ecologically enhanced shoreline techniques in a variety of settings. Sites are publicly accessible. Featured sites survived storms Irene, Lee, Sandy.
Shoreline engineers and other shoreline stakeholders want proof that innovative, ecologically beneficial shoreline techniques are as effective as traditional shoreline protection methods. The Demonstration Site Network selects examples and disseminates this information. Case studies, posted online at hrnerr.org, provide a virtual tour of constructed site over the 150-mile length of the Hudson Estuary. This network of sites demonstrates ecologically enhanced shoreline techniques in a variety of settings. Sites are publicly accessible. Featured sites survived storms Irene, Lee, Sandy.
Shoreline engineers and other shoreline stakeholders want proof that innovative, ecologically beneficial shoreline techniques are as effective as traditional shoreline protection methods. The Demonstration Site Network selects examples and disseminates this information. Case studies, posted online at hrnerr.org, provide a virtual tour of constructed site over the 150-mile length of the Hudson Estuary. This network of sites demonstrates ecologically enhanced shoreline techniques in a variety of settings. Sites are publicly accessible. Featured sites survived storms Irene, Lee, Sandy.
Emilie Hauser, NYSDEC Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Christina Tobitsch and Brian Cooke, Student Conservation Association & Hudson River NERR Funded by CICEET and NERRS Science Collaborative Shoreline engineers and other shoreline stakeholders want proof that innovative, ecologically beneficial shoreline techniques are as effective as traditional shoreline protection methods. The Demonstration Site Network selects examples and disseminates this information. Case studies, posted online at hrnerr.org, provide a virtual tour of constructed site over the 150-mile length of the Hudson Estuary. This network of sites demonstrates ecologically enhanced shoreline techniques in a variety of settings. Sites are publicly accessible. Featured sites survived storms Irene, Lee, Sandy. Coxsackie Boat Launch Coxsackie, NY Design: three rock tiers with native vegetation on a shallow slope and a sill of large stone Objectives: Improve eroding dredge spoil shoreline Protect the nearby parking lot Demonstrate that restored natural shoreline can provide erosion protection and improve habitat and human access Partners: NYS Parks & Sustainable Shorelines Assessment Form Basic Principles: Preserve existing natural shorelines Mimic nature and recognize one size does not fill all Enhance engineered shorelines ecologically Protect and restore wildlife habitat Protect and restore water resources Give the shore room to move Improve and retain public access Esopus Meadows, Esopus, NY Design: Coir rolls, live stakes and stone. Remove degraded building, shoreline armoring and impervious surfaces Make erosion resistant, publicly accessible waterfront park and paddler respite Use natural features to improve habitat and human recreation Minimize structural maintenance (survived storms Irene, Lee and Sandy) Designer: Sven Hoeger of Creative Habitat Corp. Owner: Scenic Hudson Harlem River Park, New York, NY Design: Porous seawalls composed of stacked greenwalls and flexible gabions, salt marsh plantings, and tidepools. A 20-acre park between Harlem River Parkway and the Harlem River with a mix of traditional and innovative shorelines; More functional, absorbent floodplain; Improved public access, nearshore and upland habitat; Incorporated various community organizations throughout the process; Owned and constructed by: NYC Dept of Parks & Recreation and NYC Economic Development Corp. After: Looking west Before: Looking east Before: Looking south After: Looking north Feature Weighted Importance Esopus Meadows Coxsackie Boat Launch Harlem River Park #1 Natural shoreline preservation 2 0 0 0 #2 Natural features included 3 3 3 3 #3 Hard shoreline re-engineered 1 1 0 1 #4 Substrate materials 3 3 3 3 #5 Re-vegetation 3 3 3 3 #6 Energy impacts 2 2 2 2 #7 Sea level rise 3 0 3 3 #8 Green stormwater management 1 1 0 1 #9 Wrack 2 2 2 2 #10 Maintenance or adaptive mangement 2 2 2 2 #11 Designed for human use 2 2 2 2 TOTAL POTENTIAL POINTS 24 19 20 22 PERCENT 100 79 83 92 Before: October 2003 After: June 2006 After: Spring 2012 Next Steps: 1. Develop guidance for use in design phase 2. Monitor natural & built environment Wrack-line left behind by Sandy. Approximately 7 feet above Mean High Tide After: Looking west, August 2013 Assessment Process: Designer completes assessment Team scores assessment Writer prepares detailed case study Sign & website acknowledges accomplishments