Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Corresponding author..
E-mail address: joel.rech@enise.fr (J. Rech).
0890-6955/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00141-4
usually been considered as detrimental to the compo-
nents performance (rightly or wrongly).
Highly stressed steel components, e.g., gear and bear-
ing parts, are appropriate applications of hard turning.
Investigations into residual stresses, white layer, and sur-
face roughness (surface integrity) as a function of mach-
ining parameters and tool ank wear were undertaken
on gear conebrakes of the same composition and ther-
mal history.
2. Experimental procedure
Field tests were investigated on gear conebrakes so as
to dene the limitation of the hard turning process in
mass production. Gears conebrakes are made of case-
hardened 27MnCr5 steel. Table 1 shows the chemical
composition of this steel. The cementation provides an
850 HV
0.3
hardness on the external surface and affects
about 0.6 mm of the bulk material, as shown in
Table 1
27MnCr5 chemical analysis (% ponderal, before heat treatment)
C Mn Cr Cu Ti Al Si S P
0.23 1.1 1.00 0.4 0.01 0.015 0.10 0.025 0.03
544 J. Rech, A. Moisan / International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 43 (2003) 543550
Fig. 1. Properties of the machined surface after case hardening.
Fig. 1. The composition of the case-hardened layer is
nearly constant in a 0.3 mm regular depth. The carbon
content in the layer is modied: about 1% carbon. As a
consequence, the machined material is close to a
100MnCr5 steel.
The case hardening also modies the residual stress
prole, and compressive stresses have been induced. The
removed depth of cut is 0.15 mm because of the previous
turning operations (before heat treatment). As one can
observe in Fig. 1, the surface discovered by the hard
turning operation should still have a 850 HV
0.3
hardness
and a tangential external residual stress of 400 MPa if
the cutting process did not affect the machined surface
(which is not usually the case).
As described in Fig. 2, continuous dry turning tests
were performed on a lathe of high stiffness. Finish cut-
ting was conducted at a cutting speed V
c
in the range of
50 to 250 m/min, a feed rate f in the range 0.05 to 0.2
mm/rev and a depth of cut of a
p
= 0.15 mm. The cBN
tool inserts were ISO code TNGA 160408 S (chamfer
normal rake angle g
n
= 20, chamfer width: 0.1 mm,
honing edge radius = 0.03 mm) coated with a 1 m TiN
Fig. 2. Elements used for the experiments.
layer. The tool holder was a MTJNR27050-16. The cut-
ting edge inclination angle of the insert is
s
= 6, and
the normal rake angle is g
n
= 6. An EDS analysis of
the cBN insert has shown that it is mainly composed
of about (in weight) 60% BN, 35% TiCN and some few
elements such as A1, W, and Co.
Tool ank wear was measured after each test by using
an optical microscope.
Two- and three-dimensional surface roughness values
have been measured on the conebrakes using a stylus
prolometer. The two-dimensional surface roughness
was measured using a trace length of 4.8 mm, a cut-off
length of 0.8 mm, and a gauss lter. The values were
recorded at ve equally spaced locations around the cir-
cumference of the specimen. Mean values are plotted in
Fig. 3.
3. Surface roughness
In nishing operations, as in hard turning, the end of
tool life is usually based on a predetermined damage
545 J. Rech, A. Moisan / International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 43 (2003) 543550
Fig. 3. Inuence of the cutting parameters on the surface roughness parameters after nish hard turning Steel 27MnCr5, 850 HV
0.3
, a
p
= 0.15
mm, Insert TNGA 160408 S (TiN coated).
level of the machined surface. So as to explain and pre-
dict the surface roughness, investigations have been con-
ducted to determine the effect of three parameters such
as feed rate f, cutting speed V
c
, and ank wear VB. Three
surface roughness parameters have been measured: R
a
,
R, and R
max
The general topography of the machined surface con-
sists of long straight grooves in a direction parallel to
the cutting velocity. These grooves are caused by the
micro-geometry of the cutting edge. Examination of the
machined surfaces (Fig. 3a) using three-dimensional top-
ography reveals the dependence of surface roughness on
tool radius as well as on feed rate. This kind of surface
is forbidden for a number of applications (oil tightness)
but does not concern gear conebrakes, and can be avo-
ided with additional abrasive processes such as lapping.
The theoretical expression of the surface roughness
parameter R
a
is:
Ra
f
2
18.3.r