wwwyooshincokr

y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]

[)_3)!.-_'((___)_3!l_5_/(]](]) 7
_s'__-/_/7) __'_[](;_
_5s- 3- - 7- -[^_/((;(;_-){;_7
]_)
]/ 7 _3 ^ 3( 73 ) _ )! /(],,,,),y ]
(,,,,j,) (](() \,),, ],g g,,,,),,),,(\]) (],,_ ],_ ],],) ],,,_,) ],,)(]]]) )
]-__(_)!7_))_)s]_) _ )!s
!'_)!_-/]_-_)[(_]__/___
`/[]_s)_)
^__']__[_]__9][)_3)s_)
1) __,Q[_ =]{_[,Q](zyjpyznin,,kr) ,) __,Q[_ ]{(jinnlyznin,,kr)
) __,Q[_ [(g_niyznin,,kr) 4) __,Q[_ ]_(jpprkyznin,,kr)
@[___y__g\]__{\
Feasibility Study on the Vinh Thinh Bridge Construction Project
1. Introduction
2. Objectives
3. Work Scope
4. Results of the
Feasibility Study
5. Conclusion
_]
,)
]_
|)
_
)
9 _
)
}0|0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0|
A(,__7_
1. Introduction
The project road is located in the north-
west region of Hanoi City, which is divid-
ed by Hong River. The insufficient bridge
infrastructure across the river hinders brisk
inter-regional activities in the region. And
traffi c congesti on i n/around Hanoi Ci ty
reaches to serious situations as all vehicles
across t he ri ver shal l pass t hrough t he
roads i n/around Hanoi Ci t y due t o t he
road network shape in which radial corri-
dors (National Highway No.2 and No. 32)
a re domi nant . Accordi ng t o t he Hanoi
Capital Regional Plan (No.490/QD-TTG)
approved by the minister of Ministry of
Transport on 5 May 2008, Ha Tay and Vinh
Phuc provinces were planned to be devel-
oped as centers for hi gh-technol ogi cal ,
industrial, tourism and residential activities.
However, wi t h t he current i nsuffi ci ent
bridges passing over Hong River, it is like-
ly to be hard to achieve such development
goals.
Thereon, the construction of the Vi nh
Thinh Bridge as a section of Ring Road
No.V, whi ch wi l l be a ci rcul ar road net-
work around Hanoi City, is set to be one
of the top priorities in the road network
construction plan of the Vietnamese gov-
ernment. Besides the Vinh Thinh Bridge
project is already included into the infra-
structure development plans such as the
Decision No.162/2002/QD/TTg
1)
and the
Decision No.1290/QD-TTg
2)
announced by
t he Pr i me Mi ni st er of Vi e t na m on 15
November 2003 and 26 September 2007,
respectively.
2. Objectives
Objectives of this project is to increase
the accessibility for residents; to reduce
vehicle travel times and vehicle operating
costs; and to al l evi ate traffi c congesti on
in/around the Hanoi Ci ty by l i nki ng Ha
Tay and Vi nh Phuc provi nces wi t h t he
Vinh Thinh Bridge.
It also focuses on reducing logistic costs,
encouragi ng l ower povert y rat i o i n t he
region, and improving living conditions by
activating exchanges in people and goods
bet ween t he t wo provi nces. It wi l l al so
promote the growth of industrial complex-
es located in Vinh Phuc, Yen Bai and Puc
Yen.
3. Work Scope
The proj ect area i s l ocat ed i n around
*_=
}0,0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0,
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
40km northwest from the Hanoi City cen-
ter and the work scope of the Feasibility
Study (FS) Project is as follows:
Direct influenced area : wi thi n 10
km radius around the project section
Indirect influenced are a : northwest
region of Vietnam
The base year of the FS analyses is the
year 2008, and the target year is the year
2032 that will be after 20 years from the
openi ng year (2013) of the Vi nh Thi nh
Br i dge ( The cons t r uct i on per i od i s
assumed as 3 years.).
The scope of work of the FS comprises
of two main parts. They are as follows:
t o conduct a feasi bi l i t y st udy for
about 9. 05km connecti ng Ha Ta y
provi nce and Vi nh Phuc provi nce
considering engineering, economic,
social, road safety and environmen-
t a l a s pect s ba s ed on t he Pre -
Feasibility Study conducted by MOT,
2005.
to supply necessary information for
t he EDCF l oan apprai sal mi ssi on
after the FS by collecting and ana-
lyzing relevant data.
The FS was carri ed out for 3 months
from 30 Apri l to 29 Jul y 2008 i n accor-
da nc e wi t h EDCF Feasi bi l i t y St udy
Guideline, Korea EXIMBank, 2007 .
}0,0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0,
A(A__7_
*_=
4. Results of the Feasibility Study
4.1 Selection of the Best Alignment
Three al ternati ves were suggested and
compared in considerations of i) to avoid
t he maj or hi s t or i cal s i t e, Doung Lam
Hi s t or i cal Monument , i i ) t o mi ni mi ze
adverse impacts for residential areas and
cultural assets, iii) to be linked to the corri-
dor of Ring Road No. V , and iv) to con-
nect directly to Son Tay Bypass section.
Finally, Alternative 1 was selected as the
best alignment under the agreement of rel-
evant organizations in Vietnam.
Comparison of Alignment Alternatives
Category Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Length
Road 4.45km 3.25km 3.37km
Bridge 4.60km 4.60km 4.04km
Total 9.05km 7.85km 7.41km
Construction Cost 81.4 million USD 80.1 million USD 72.7 million USD
Intersection 3 3 3
Advantage &
Disadvantage
Good vertical and
horizontal alignment
Good Connection with
Son Tay Bypass sec-
tion
Good living condition
by ending point avoid-
ing residential area
Highest project cost
Fair vertical and hori-
zontal alignment
Good Connection with
Son Tay Bypass sec-
tion
Excessive affection to
residential area located
at the end of project
road
Normal project cost
Good vertical and hori-
zontal alignment
Not Suitable for con-
nection with Son Tay
Bypass section
Affection to Doung
Lam Historical
Monument
Lowest project cost
}0}0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0}
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
4.2 Traffic Demand Forecast
Statistical data, road network data, and
origin-destination data of The Study on
t he Nat i onal Tr ans por t Devel opment
St r at egy i n t he Soci al i s t Republ i c of
Vietnam, JICA, 2000 we re used as t he
basic data for traffic demand forecast i n
this project. Because no substantial data or
i nformat i on was avai l abl e i n t he Pre -
Feasibility Study about the traffic demand
forecast for the proposed construction pro-
ject.
The future traffic demand is forecasted
as 5, 552 pcu/day in 2013 and as 33, 716
pcu/day in 2032. Annual traffic growth rate
is expected at around 10%. The future traf-
fic volumes are summarized as the table
bel ow.
<Forecast Future Traffic volume>
(Unit : pcu/day)
Year Car Bus Truck Motorcycle Sum
2013 1,381 1,717 1,351 1,103 5,552
2014 1,594 1,877 1,470 1,163 6,104
2015 1,833 2,053 1,600 1,226 6,712
2016 2,102 2,246 1,741 1,293 7,382
2017 2,402 2,456 1,895 1,363 8,116
2018 2,740 2,687 2,062 1,437 8,926
2019 3,117 2,939 2,244 1,515 9,814
2020 3,538 3,214 2,442 1,597 10,792
2021 4,009 3,515 2,658 1,684 11,866
2022 4,536 3,845 2,892 1,775 13,048
2023 5,188 4,176 3,126 1,859 14,348
2024 5,918 4,535 3,377 1,946 15,776
2025 6,735 4,926 3,650 2,037 17,348
2026 7,648 5,349 3,944 2,133 19,074
2027 8,669 5,810 4,262 2,233 20,974
2028 9,810 6,310 4,606 2,338 23,064
2029 11,082 6,853 4,977 2,447 25,360
2030 12,502 7,443 5,379 2,562 27,886
2031 14,083 8,084 5,813 2,683 30,662
2032 15,847 8,779 6,281 2,809 33,716
Growth rate 13.7% 9.0% 8.4% 5.0% 10.0%
}00,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0
A((__7_
*_=
It i s reques t ed t hat t he proj ect roa d
shoul d be wi dened to a 4-l ane road by
2028 when the traffic volume will be over
the highway capacity of a 2-lane road.
4.3 Preliminary Engineering Design
Design Standard
The design standards of the project road
are based on the Class III of the highway
classification shown in TCVN 4054 : 2005
Highway-Specifications for Design of the
Vietnamese government. The design speed
of the Class III road is 80km/h as shown in
the table below.
Specifications Unit
Highway Classification
Class II Class III Class IV
Design Speed km/h 100 80 60
Number of Lane - 4 2 2
Lane Width m 3.75 3.5 3.5
Shoulder Width m 3.0 2.5 1.0
Paved Shoulder Width m 2.5 2.0 0.5
Median Width m 1.5 - -
Road Width m 22.5 12.0 9.0
Stop Sight distance m 150 100 75
Minimum Radius m 400 250 125
Minimum Radius(Recommendation) m 700 400 250
Minimum Radius(Omissible super-elevation) m 4,000 2,500 1,500
Max. Grade % 4 5 6
Minimum Length of vertical curve m 85 70 50
Crest Curve
Min. Radius m 6,000 4,000 2,500
Min. Radius(Recommendation) m 10,000 5,000 4,000
Sag Curve
Min. Radius m 3,000 2,000 1,000
Min. Radius(Recommendation) m 5,000 3,000 1,500
Maximum Super-elevation % 8 8 7
Standard Super-elevation % 2 2 2
Minimum Clearance m 4.75 4.75 4.75
}0(0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0(
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
Typical Cross Section
The typical cross section of the 4-lane
Class III road on TCVN 4054 : 2005
Highway - Specifications for Design has
the width of 19.0m as shown in the picture
bel ow.
Typical Cross Section of Earthwork(B=19m, 4-lanes)
However, the cross sections of the pro-
j ect roa d we re f i na l l y de t e rmi ne d a s
shown in the picture below in considera-
tions of harmonization with the present &
planned road sections in Ha Tay province
(urban area) and Vinh Phuc province(rural
area). At the meeti ng on 17 Jul y 2008,
Vietnam Road Administration(VRA) and
PMU Thang Long requested that the cross
sections of the project road shoul d have
t he 21m wi dt h i n Ha Tay sect i on, t he
16.5m width in the bridge section, and the
12m width in the Vinh Phuc section
Typical Cross Section of Earthwork (B=12m, 2-lanes)
Typical Cross Section of Earthwork (B=21m, 4-lanes)
}00,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0
A((__7_
*_=
Bridge
The selected alignment runs over Hong
River at around 100m downstream from
the Vinh Thinh ferry station. It is planned
with considerations of :
i ) Minimization of the bridge length and
construction costs;
ii) St ruct ural saf et y and durabi l i t y &
Future traffic volumes; and
iv) Technical specifications requested by
the Vietnam regulations
- Width of the bridge = 16.5m
- Span of the main bridge = 120m con-
t i nuous pre-stres s ed concret e box
gi rder usi ng t he bal ance f re e c a n-
tilever casting method
- Span of the supporting bridge
= 40m Super T girder
- Clearance for river(class I)
= 80m(W) 10m(H)
Cross Section of the Main Bridge(PSC Box Girder, B=16.5, 4-lanes)
Cross Section of the Supporting Bridge(Super T-Beam, B=16.5, 4-lanes)
}0;0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0;
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
4.4 Cost Estimation
Ori gi nal l y, the proj ect costs were esti-
mated for three (3) different construction
alternatives - Alternative 1, 2, and 3. Two
additional alternatives, Alternatives 2-1 and
3-1, were al so anal yzed as requested by
MOT5). Therefore, the project costs for 5
alternatives were calculated with consider-
i ng economi c efficiency, financial condi-
tions of government and requests of MOT.
Those are shown in the table below.
<Alternatives by Construction Method>
Note : Alternative 1-1was not considered due to its excessive construction cost and the request
of MOT, Vietnam.
Construction Method Section
Phased Construction
(Phase 1 Phase 2)
Excluding
Son Tay
Bypass
section
Alternative 1
(Phased Construction)
- Ha Taysection
- Bridge section
- Vinh Phuc section
12.0m 21.0m
12.0m 24.0m
12.0m 21.0m
Alternative 2
(4-lanes construction)
- Ha Taysection
- Bridge section
- Vinh Phuc section
21.0m
16.5m
21.0m
Alternative 3
(Phased Construction)
- Ha Taysection
- Bridge section
- Vinh Phuc section
21.0m
16.5m
12.0m 21.0m
Including
Son Tay
Bypass
section
Alternative 1-1*
Alternative 2-1
(4-lanes construction)
- Son Tay Bypass section
- Ha Taysection
- Bridge section
- Vinh Phuc section
21.0m
21.0m
16.5m
21.0m
Alternative 3-1
(Phased Construction)
- Son Tay Bypass section
- Ha Taysection
- Bridge section
- Vinh Phuc section
21.0m
21.0m
16.5m
12.0m 21.0m
}0;0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}0;
A1(__7_
*_=
As mentioned above, five alternatives is shown as the diagram below.
The project costs by alternative are summarized as the table below.
Typical Cross Section of Earthwork(2-lanes, 12m)
Typical Cross Section of Earthwork(4-lanes, 21m)
Cross Section of Main Bridge(4-lanes, 16.5m)
Cross Section of Supporting Bridge(4-lanes, 16.5m)
Diagram on Alternatives by Construction Method
}|00,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|0
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
<Project Costs by Alternative excluding the Son Tay Bypasssection>
(Unit : 1,000 USD)
Description
Excluding Son TayBypass Section
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Phase 1
(2 lane)
Phase 2
(Widening to
4lane)
4 lane construc-
tion
Phase 1
(2 lane)
Phase 2
(Widening
to 4lane)
1. Civil Works 64,727,128 62,913,835 81,965,763 78,638,382 3,034,589
A. Earth Works 1,629,592 1,007,774 2,856,902 1,629,592 1,007,774
B. Pavement 1,481,304 916,069 2,596,933 1,481,304 916,069
C. Drainage 163,747 82,471 169,950 163,747 82,471
D. Miscellaneous 198,879 147,390 201,892 198,879 147,390
E. Soft Soil 1,374,360 880,885 2,349,584 1,374,360 880,885
F. Bridge 59,879,246 59,879,246 73,790,500 73,790,500 0
2. Consulting Services 5,808,560 5,706,285 7,106,360 7,031,600 270,078
3. Direct Cost(1+2) 70,535,688 68,620,120 89,072,123 85,669,982 3,304,667
4. Vale Added Tax
(VAT : 10% of 3)
7,053,569 6,862,012 8,907,212 8,566,998 330,467
5. Contingencies 23,448,179 22,811,386 29,237,924 28,121,172 1,072,761
5-1. Physical Contingency
(10%of3)
7,053,569 6,862,012 8,907,212 8,566,998 330,467
5-2. Price Contingency
(20.42~21.13% of(3+5-1))
16,394,610 15,949,374 20,330,712 19,554,173 742,294
6. Project Management
Cost(1% of 3)
705,357 1,372,402 890,721 856,700 33,047
7. Land Acquisition &
Compensation
2,326,880 2,039,217 3,630,956 2,863,853 767,103
8. Service charge(0.1% of
EDCF)
200,260 195,126 267,937 258,572 10,628
9. Total (3+4+5+6+7+8) 104,269,933 101,900,263 132,006,873 126,337,277 5,518,673
}||0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}||
A1,__7_
*_=
(Unit : 1,000 USD)
<Project Costs by Alternative including the Son Tay Bypass'section>
Note :1. ( ) means the construction costs of the Son Tay Bypass'section.
2. Phase 2'of Alternative 3-1'is widening the road in Vinh Phuc Province till the year 2027.
Description
Excluding Son TayBypass Section
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Phase 1
(2 lane)
Phase 2
(Widening to
4lane)
4 lane construc-
tion
Phase 1
(2 lane)
Phase 2
(Widening
to 4lane)
1. Civil Works 64,727,128 62,913,835 81,965,763 78,638,382 3,034,589
A. Earth Works 1,629,592 1,007,774 2,856,902 1,629,592 1,007,774
B. Pavement 1,481,304 916,069 2,596,933 1,481,304 916,069
C. Drainage 163,747 82,471 169,950 163,747 82,471
D. Miscellaneous 198,879 147,390 201,892 198,879 147,390
E. Soft Soil 1,374,360 880,885 2,349,584 1,374,360 880,885
F. Bridge 59,879,246 59,879,246 73,790,500 73,790,500 0
2. Consulting Services 5,808,560 5,706,285 7,106,360 7,031,600 270,078
3. Direct Cost(1+2) 70,535,688 68,620,120 89,072,123 85,669,982 3,304,667
4. Vale Added Tax
(VAT : 10% of 3)
7,053,569 6,862,012 8,907,212 8,566,998 330,467
5. Contingencies 23,448,179 22,811,386 29,237,924 28,121,172 1,072,761
5-1. Physical Contingency
(10%of3)
7,053,569 6,862,012 8,907,212 8,566,998 330,467
5-2. Price Contingency
(20.42~21.13% of(3+5-1))
16,394,610 15,949,374 20,330,712 19,554,173 742,294
6. Project Management
Cost(1% of 3)
705,357 1,372,402 890,721 856,700 33,047
7. Land Acquisition &
Compensation
2,326,880 2,039,217 3,630,956 2,863,853 767,103
8. Service charge(0.1% of
EDCF)
200,260 195,126 267,937 258,572 10,628
9. Total (3+4+5+6+7+8) 104,269,933 101,900,263 132,006,873 126,337,277 5,518,673
}|,0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|,
wwwyooshincokr
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
4.5 Economic Analysis
The economi c anal ysi s for the project
was conduct ed accordi ng to the EDCF
gui del i nes usi ng i nternati onal l y accepted
met hods . The res ul t of t he economi c
analysis shows that all the alternatives are
economi cal l y feasi bl e because t he B/C
ratios for all the alternatives are over 1.0.
Alternat i ve 3 has the hi ghest EIRR,
17.65%, and is estimated as the best alter-
nat i ve as f ar as economi c f eas i bi l i t y.
However, it is evaluated that any alterna-
tive among Alternative 1, 2, 2-1 and 3-1
can be sel ected i n vi ew of the pol i ci es
because the EIRRs of the alternatives are
almost the same (within 1% point differ-
ence).
Alternative B/C NPV EIRR
Excluding
Son TayBypass
Section
Alternative 1
(Phase construction)
1.70 58,341,540 16.37%
Alternative 2
(4lane construction)
1.94 84,285,863 17.42%
Alternative 3
(Phase construction)
1.99 85,799,725 17.65%
Including
Son TayBypass
Section
Alternative 2-1
(4lane construction)
1.80 77,343,011 16.75%
Alternative 3-1
(Phase construction)
1.84 78,745,405 16.94%
Financial analysis was not conducted in the FS because the project road is not a toll road.
4.6 Environmental Analysis
Environmental impact analysis in the FS
on the Vi nh Thi nh Bri dge constructi on
project was followed by EDCF Feasibility
Study Guidelines, Korea EximBank, 2007 .
According to the Guidelines, the project is
cl as s i f i ed as Cat egor y B Theref ore
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
for the project is not necessary. Accordi ng
to Vi etnamese regul ati ons, however, EIA
for the project should be conducted in the
stage of Feasibility Study .
In the situation, it was conclude during
t he 2nd Fi el d Survey and t he MOT
Meeting on 4 June 2008 that the environ-
mental impact analysis for the FS on the
Vinh Thinh Bridge construction project do
follow the EDCF guidelines. At the same
meeting, it is also concluded that EIA fol-
lowed by Vietnam regulations will be con-
ducted by TEDI, a local engineering com-
pany, for acqui ri ng approval of the FS
from relevant central ministries.
It is analyzed that the project produces
no s er i ous f a ct or s t o ca us e nega t i ve
}|,0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|,
A1A__7_
*_=
impacts on its surroundings or residential
area because the selected route alignment
passes mostly farm lands with a little resi-
dential areas. And appropriate mitigation
measures on expected negati ve i mpacts
was suggest ed for mi ni mi zi ng negat i ve
impacts
4.7 Resettlement Plan
The resettlement plan in the FS on the
Vi nh Thi nh Bri dge constructi on proj ect
was conducted based on EDCF Feasibility
Study Guidelines, Korea EximBank, 2007 .
Duri ng the 2nd Fi el d Survey and t he
MOT Meeting on 4 June 2008 , the work
for establishing the resettlement plan fol-
l owe d by Vi e t na m re g ul a t i ons wa s
assigned to TEDI in order to get approval
on the Vinh Thinh project from rel evant
ministries.
Quantities of land acquisition and com-
pensat i on affect ed by t he proj ect were
roughly estimated using the updated topo-
graphi c map(1: 5, 000) and uni t val ues of
land acquisition and compensation costs.
In the case of Alternative 3 , total land
acquisition and compensation cost is esti-
mated as USD 2,862,853.
4.8 Financial Plan of the Vietnamese
Government
Taking into account financial resources
of the Vietnamese Government and uncer-
tainty of private invested projects, this pro-
j ect was cl assi fi ed t o be fi nanced wi t h
Korea EDCF loan.
4.9 Project Implementation Plan
Det ai l ed Des i gn and Land
Acquisition : 2009
Construction Period :
2010 ~ 2012 (3 years)
Item
2009 2010 2011 2012
3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12
Selection of Consultant
Detailed Design
Land Acquisition
Selection of Contractor
Construction
Construction Supervision
}|}0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|}
wwwyooshincokr _A1
5. Conclusion
[]](;__5s 3 7
-'=_3s
_s_) _5[ ]
_')_
/7__'j)_3'_
)
' _7 _{ j j_; __
5__'/s-)
i__si__
(,,,,,),,y)]__(,,,@,,,y)]_
______))
/^5_/_-/
7s-)i__5
/_!s7_'/
5 _s_'
5=_;)
[ ] - )! 7-
___!_!)
7)-/_-_7_/
l- . l7) 5s
7- _ _
]((] 7_//
7___!_)
' jQF]; @ _]_ {__ j ;]
q7_ __
[])!_-/_-__
___-_)_3
_s[]/
_+/s'_]-/7
]_^-]
-__};__
) "' [^/_'
_^)_};
_'//_7]`/
^_)
' [7_( _7_(]_)(P_ { j_
]_( j ]_{3; _
_- __)
_3!'))_3!'/s
_) "' ,_)_
3)-/_'/i_
_)['[)_3_'_^_3
_3___^) !'
__/_-3___
_-_____/_
) -/!'3_ 3_
[_ _ _ l _)
-/!'i(_
3_3'(;
_)
y __[_ _{]_ J__ ]
}|0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|
A1(__7_
*_=
Reference
1. The Study on the National Transport
Development Strategy in the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam, JICA, 2000
2. The Pl anni ng on Cons t r uct i on of
Hanoi Capital Region up to 2020 with
a Vision toward 2050, MOC, 2008
3. The Comprehensive Urban Develop-
ment Program in Hanoi Capital City of
t he Soci al i st Republ i c of Vi et nam,
JICA, 2007
4. Pre-Feasibility Study for Vinh Thinh
Br i dge- Nat i onal Hi ghway No. 2C
Project, MOT, 2005
5. NH2C Vi nh Yen-Son Tay: Feasi bi l i ty
Study Report, SMEC, 2006
6. NH2C Vinh Yen-Son Tay: Resettlement
Action Plan, SMEC, 2006
7. NH2C Vi nh Yen-Son Tay : Envi ron-
mental Management Plan, SMEC, 2006
8. GMS Southern Coastal Corridor Project
Final Report, ADB, 2006
9. EDCF Feasi bi l i ty Study Gui del i nes,
Korea Eximbank, 2007

1) The Vi nh Thi nh br i dge proj ect i s

i ncl uded i n The Deci si on No. 162/
2002/QD/TTg dated on 15 November
2003 issued by Prime Minister about
t he a pproval of Pl an of Road
Development of Vietnam to 2010 and
toward 2020.
2) The Vinh Thinh bridge project is one
of national items attracting FDI in the
periods 2006-2010 with The Decision
No 1290/QD- TTg dat ed on 26
Sept ember 2007 i s s ued by Pr i me
Minister about the approval of issuing
nati onal i tems attracti ng FDI i n the
periods 2006-2010.
}|(0,,,) .; ,00;.|,., ,|, [ }P7}|(