Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, Niyama & Beim (eds) 0 2000 Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5809 150 3
ynote lecture: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of statnarnic load
test Tirawat Boonyatee & Makoto Kimura Kyoto University, Japan Feng Zhang GifLl Universiq, Japan ABSTRACT In order to stud! the inechaiiisin of pile-soil interaction during statnamic loading. a FEM program is de- veloped Since it ni l 1 also be applied to the statnamic test of piles in lateral direction. batter piles. group pile. and pile raft foundation, the anal! sis SJ stem is formulated i n three-dimensional space Elasto-plastic model is used for the ground material Joint element is also used for slip at the pile-soil interface The analysis program uses the direct inte- gration scheine to solve the elasto-plastic anal!sis in time domain Laboratory tests of single piles are analjzed to iii- vestigate the validit! of the developed program Firstly. the simulatioiis of static load test are done and compared \i7ith the nieasurcd data from the tests Then. the simulatioiis of piles uiider statnamic are conducted uiider the same grouiid coiidition Finall!. thc comparisons betu cen the static and statnamic responses of piles are discussed 1 INTRODUCTION At present, the primary approach to investigating pile behavior under statnamic loading is to make a comparison between the results of full-scale stat- namic and static load tests. Unfortunately, this cali- bration method has an inherent problem in its testing consistency, as was addressed by Amir & Amir (1995). Under the uncertainty and complexity of the target ground, the situation whereby any model can be validated by calibrating statnamic load tests against corresponding static load tests can be dem- onstrated as follows: 1 I f a comparison is made of the results of tests on the same pile, the tests have to be done in se- quence. Therefore, the quality of the later tests invariably deteriorates due to the induced residual stresses from the former tests. 2 If a comparison is made between the results of tests on different piles, significant samples should be tested in order to achieve some degree of reli- ability over the ground uncertainty. lnstead of studying the data from the field tests, the mechanism of the piles during statnamic loading can be thoroughly investigated by the numerical analysis approaches. Applying the fact that the system of in- terest is axis-symmetry, Matsumoto (1998) applied a 2D-FEM program to analyze the behavior of a single pile under vertical loading. Although a two- dimensional analysis is simpler and the solution can be found faster than with a three dimensional analy- sis, it cannot be applied to a complex system such as a pile-raft foundation or batter piles Moreover, it is obvious for a horizontal loading case that the analy- sis should be done in three-dimensional space In order to develop a unified tool that can be ap- plied for various types of problems, a three- dimensional finite element analysis program called DYSC (Dynamic and Static systems analysis Code) is originally developed No-tension criteria and a simple elasto-plastic model based on the Drucker- Prager theory are applied as the yield functions for the model ground An interface layer element is in- serted at the interface between the pile and the soil For the pile body, a linear elastic relation is used since the applied force is lower than its yielding point It is thought that before applying the DYSC to the simulation of piles, its fidelity should be checked by a physical model For calibration purposes, a com- parison of the analytical results to the laboratory test results is preferred to the results from the field tests The reasons are due to the complexity of the ground and the qualities of the geotechnical parameters re- quired for the analysis In our previous study, a small-scale statnamic loading device (3SLD-Mkl) was used to conduct laboratory tests of piles under vertical loading (Ki- mura et a1 1998) This device is used to conduct ex- periments under a controllable environment Conse- quently, guaranteeing that the series of tests are done under the same conditions is possible Accompanied with the data from those experiments, a comparison 563 between the simulation and the experiment is made and reported in this paper. 2 DETAILS OF ANALYSIS 2.1 Inyzrt yaranieters To determine the necessary parameters used in the simulations of the statnamic load test, trial calcula- tions are made. As shown in Figure 1, an analysis is conducted in the half area of the pile-soil system. Young's modulus of the pile is back calculated from the flexural test results. Poisson's ratios for the pile and the soil material are assumed to be 0.2 and 0.333, respectively. A parametric study has been made to determine the Young's modulus of the model ground. From various trial calculations and comparisons with data from static load tests, a Young's modulus of 4.9 MPa and a frictional angle of 32 are selected as rational quantities for the ground materials. The frictional angle of 32 for soil gives the calculated ultimate load at more or less the same level as the measured data. A Young's modulus of 4.9 MPa controls the shape of the load- displacement of the pile before failure. Using these values, a satisfactory approximation for pile re- sponse can be obtained. The load-displacement plot from calculations and measured data is shown in Figure 2. 0 1 2 3 3 5 6 D i sp 1 acein ent (in in) Figure 2. Load-displacement relations from simulation and experiment. Table 1. Prouerties of materials Sand Pile Density (kg/m3) 1467 2150 Young's modulus (MPa) 4.90 5.00s 103 Poisson's ratio 0.333 0.200 Friction angle ( ) 32 Dilatmcy angle () 9 The properties of each material determined from an inverse analysis are summarized in Table 1. 2.2 Pile-soil inteiface model The Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion is used for the interaction between the pile and the soil. It states that failure will take place if the magnitude of shear stress (z) on the failure plane is equal to the value given by the following relationship: in which 1 1 denotes the absolute value, 0, is the normal stress on the failure plane, and $0 and CO are material constants for the pile-soil interface. In this study, adhesion, or CO, is assumed to be zero. The frictional angle of the pile-soil interface is assumed to be 0.9 times the frictional angle of sand. Equation (1) can be written in the form of yield fbnction F as Figure 1. Analysis mesh. 564 F = jzl- CT, tan$o If the material is sheared to the yield surface and the associated flow rule is adopted, the rates of plastic normal strain d&; and shear strain 7' are given by which implies (4) Increments in shear displacement along the plane are accompanied by increments in normal displacement. The dilation of the shear plane will go unbound un- der yielding. To avoid this unfavorable behavior, the non-associated flow rule is adopted for the pile-soil interface. By introducing dilatancy angle y, the plastic potential function can be written as I n this study, no dilation is assumed for the pile-soil interface, i.e., w-+ 0. 3 SIMUL,ATION ON STATNAMIC LOAD TEST After necessary parameters were back calculated from the previous section, a dynamic FEM analysis of a pile under Statnamic loading is done and com- pared with the experiment results. The loading rate dependency of the ground response is represented by a constant damping parameter. In this simulation, velocity and acceleration are calculated from the displacement by the Newmark method. The stiffness matrix (IQ the damping matrix (C), and the mass matrix (A4) are calculated from the following equa- tions: K =J B' DBdd 1.01 (7) 0.0 0. 2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Di sp 1 acein eiit (m in ) Figure 3. Load-displacement relations from statiiaiiuc simula- tion and experiment. where N is a so-called shape function or displace- ment interpolation function, R denotes a displace- ment to the strain transformation fbnction, and 11 is a strain to stress-strain transformation function. Pa- rameter ,U is used to represent the damping constant per volume of interested material in the same man- ner as the density (p) is applied in the mass matrix. Based on trial calculations, a damping constant of 3.9 MN/(m/s)/m3 (,U as defined in Equation (7)) is used as the material constant for statnamic simula- tions. The estimated load-displacement relation and the test data are shown in Figure 3 . Note that the initial displacement in statnamic load tests does not conform to that in the static load tests. The initial displacement in the statnamic load tests is a little bit smaller than the corresponding value in the Static load tests. This may contribute to the loading rate ef- fect during the equipment installation process. To correct this inconsistency, the load-displacement re- lation (from the experiment) of the statnamic load test is shifted to the right in order to match the 'true' displacement in the static load tests. 4 COMPARISON BETWEEN COMPUTED STATIC AND STATNAMIC LOADING RESULTS The distributions of displacement along a pile under static loading are shown by Figure 4. At the peak load, the elastic contraction represented by the dif- ference in settlement between the pile head and the toe is about 0.05 mm. When compared to the overall settlement, this contraction is about 5% of the pile head settlement. The distribution of axial force along the pile is shown in Figure 5. The application of load is sustained almost totally by friction resistance, with only a small amount of force being transmitted to the pile tip. The ratio of the end bearing resistance to the shaft resistance is about 1 :4.5. 565 () 0 0 2 0 -4 0 0 0 8 1 0 D 1 s p lacem en t ( m m) Figure 4 Distnbdion of displaccnient along pile under static loading 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3% -100 Load (N) Figurc 5. Distribution of axial forcc along pilc undcr slalic loading. Figurc 6 Vanation III vclocitj of pilc licad <and toe along tiiiic St3t.k s tatnarfl k: 150 N - 0 - 150 N + 250 N - 0 - 250 1\1 +400N - 0 - 400N + 450 N - H - 450 N ~"' "1' ""1"""' "I ""' I ""' I ' ' "' I ' ""I ' The pile velocitv versus time relation is shown in Figure 6. At the maximum displacement, the veloc- ity of the pile head is equal to zero. At the same time, the velocity of the pile tip is almost identical to that of the pile head. This implies that the pile be- haves as a rigid body at the unloading point. Axial force distributions of the pile during statnamic loading as well as a comparison with those of the static load test are shown in Figure 7. At the same applied load level, the axial force distributions of the two cases are almost identical. There are no sub- stantial changes in load sustained by the pile tip. In- creases in capacity mainly contributed to the shaft resistance. The effect of a stress wave is not ob- served in this analysis. 5 CONCLUSIOK When compared to field tests that have the inherent problem of ground uncertainty, the model tests pre- sented here show the possibility for conducting Stat- namic load tests under one uniform condition. Only by this approach can the data be interpreted on ab- solutely the same basis. Based on the results pre- sented here, the following conclusions can be sum- marized: 1 The finite element analysis (DYSC) shows that the elastic contraction of the pile is relatively small. This value represents about 5% of the total displacement. From the load distribution plot, the applied load is mainly supported by shaft friction. The model pile is thought to be a friction pile. 566 The ratio of shaft resistance to end bearing resis- tance is about 1:4.5. 2 Velocities of the pile head and the pile tip are al- most identical and equal zero at the unloading point. This supports the assumption that a pile moves as a rigid body at the unloading point. 3 The axial force distribution from the statnamic load test is almost similar to that from the static load test. The stress wave effect, as in dynamic load tests, is not observed in the present. This im- plies that in the statnamic load test, the pile is loaded in the same manner as in the static load test. At present, the horizontal load tests on group piles have been conducted and reported elsewhere (Ki- mura et al., 1999). The improvement on DYSC in order to simulate the piles under lateral loading is under operating. REFERENCES Amir. J M and Aniir. E I 1995 A Lumped-Parameter Model for Statnanvc Testing ProL of the 1" Iiit 'I ,Stntiianiic &i ~ i i - iiar, I i7iicoiiver pp 221-230 Matsuiiioto. T 1998 FEM anal!sis of Statnainic test on open- elided steel pipe pile pro^ oftlze Td Iiit 'I StatiiamiL Seiiii- I?W, Ibkvo, pre-printed volunie Balkerna Kiniura. M . Boonjatee, T & Yoshida. A 1998 Expenmental stud! of Statnainic load test b! air-pressure based loading apparatus ~ r o c of the 21' ~ ~ i i t ' ~ StntmniiiL Seiviiiar, 70Iil0, pre-priiited volutiie Balkenia Kimura. M . Boonlatee, T & Yoshida. A 1999 Evperinicntal Stud! of Lateral Statnaiiuc Load tests on Group Piles I ' i m oftlie J '" Iiit ' I Colif oii Deep Foiiiidatroii I+actice 111 or- prat i ng PILEX-ILK '99, Singapore pp 263-27 1 567
Negative Mass and Negative Refractive Index in Atom Nuclei - Nuclear Wave Equation - Gravitational and Inertial Control: Part 5: Gravitational and Inertial Control, #5