Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
.Appellant
Versus
..Respondents
WITH
Appellant
Versus
..Respondents
JUDGMENT
M.Y. EQBAL, J.
These appeals are directed against judgment and order
dated 06.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and
Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 342-DB of 2006, whereby the
High Court dismissed the appeal of the accused persons and
upheld the judgment dated 25.04.2006 passed by the
Page1
Page2
It is
the result she used to pick up quarrel with him. Her husband
gave her beatings under the influence of intoxication. None
made attempt to extinguish fire.
3.
the spot and prepared rough site plan with correct marginal
notes and took into possession burnt clothes of Rajni, ash of
burnt clothes, one kerosene lamp after converting the same
into sealed parcel.
site plan was sketched and FSL report was obtained. After
completion of investigation, only accused Mahender Singh
Page3
4.
examined nine witnesses. According to Dr. Ravi Kanta (PW1), who conducted post mortem examination, burn injuries
were approximately 50% and cause of death of Rajni was
due to ante mortem burns, which were sufficient to cause
death in ordinary course of nature. According to Dr. Naresh
Kumar Kardwal (PW-3), who medico-legally examined the
deceased, found superficial deep burns all over the body
except back, hip, lower leg, left hand and forearm.
He
Page4
turned out from the matrimonial house in the year 1997. His
daughter divulged about the illicit relations between her
husband and sister-in-law.
Against
Page5
telephonic message,
After
his
brother
and
bhabhi,
who
were
residing
The
Page6
The Child
called her father, who was on the ground floor in the flour
mill at that time.
court has opined that the child has been tutored as she was
residing with accused persons, namely, Prem and Bimla,
after the death of her mother and she had come along with
them on the date of examination in the Court. Trial court
further observed that broken glasses of the lamp had fallen
in the verandah and not in the kitchen.
6.
of the parties, the trial court held that the prosecution has
proved that the accused persons, in furtherance of the
common intention, subjected Rajni to cruelty as her husband
had illicit relations with co-accused Bimla (Bhabhi). The Trial
Court convicted all the three accused persons under Section
Page7
Page8
She
further
submitted
that
the
dying
Page9
9.
She further
10
Page10
under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. he faced the trial along with the
main accused. Finally, she submitted that in the absence of
eye-witness to the incident the prosecution story based on
inconsistent evidence of the witnesses cannot be relied
upon.
11
Page11
v.
reliable
The dying
12
Page12
Sd/ACJM, Rohtak
10.12.2003
13
Page13
14
Page14
15
Page15
16
Page16
of
17
Page17
18
Page18
19
Page19
16.
counsel
appearing
for
the
appellant
that
the
dying
17.
20
Page20
that the said accused Prem Kumar Gulati was innocent and
he was not involved in the commission of the offence.
18. Admittedly, they were not put on trial along with the
main accused-appellant Mahender Singh. It was only at the
stage of Section 319, Cr.P.C. the accused persons namely
Prem Kumar Gulati and his wife were summoned and put on
trial. Except dying declaration there is nothing on record to
strongly suggest that they were involved in the commission
of crime. There is nothing in the findings of sessions court
which suggest that the said accused persons participated in
the commission of the aforesaid crime, and this fact has
been reiterated by the High Court also.
21
Page21
were
22
Page22
these
two
participated
along
with
the
main
accused
As
given
to
accused-appellant
Prem
Kumar
and
his
We are,
23
Page23
.J.
(M.Y. Eqbal)
.J.
(Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
New Delhi,
September 23, 2014.
24
Page24
25
Page25