Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
k
r
oT
or
_
Q qC
p
oT
ot
: 1
The cooling rate of steel in water cooling box depends on various operation parameters,such as rod size, rod
speed, rod temperature at the nishing mill, water pressure, water ow-rate and spray cooling sequence. Dif-
ferent boundary conditions were selected for various cooling zones, each boundary condition was dened by
Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269 1261
its length and rod conveying speed. The heat ow at the surface (q
s
) can be obtained by the following relation-
ship [9]:
_ q
s
hT
s
T
0
; 2
where T
s
indicates the surface temperature,T
0
is the air or water temperature, and h is a combined heat trans-
fer coecient which includes a convection heat transfer coecient (h
c
) and a radiation heat transfer coecient
(h
r
), h = h
c
+ h
r
. Detail equations are given in literature [7,9].
The forced convection and radiation cooling took an important role during the Stelmor controlled cooling
process. The heat-transfer coecient of air forced convection and radiation are temperature dependent func-
tions obtained from industrial data. The phase transformation heat can be calculated by Eq. (3) [6]
DT
H
C
p
DF ; 3
where H is phase transformation heat enthalpy in kcal/kg, C
p
is specic heat capacity in kcal/(kg C), and DF
is volume increment of pearlite transformed from austenite.
3.2. Austenite evolution model
Based on the laboratory experimental results and other research works [1012], the microstructure evolu-
tion of steel can be modeled by the following equations.
3.2.1. Critical strain
The critical strain required for the onset of dynamic recrystallization is calculated on the basis of the hot
compressure test results using the following equations [1,9,10,13,14]:
Final mechanical properties
Strain-temperature model
Temperature field distribution
Strain-recrystallization model
Process parameters
Recrystallization volume fraction,
grain size,residual strain
Phase transformation model
Kenitics of austenitic transformation,final pearlite
lump size,interlamellar spacing of pearlite
Microstructure-property model
Fig. 2. Flow chart of computer simulation.
1262 Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269
e
C
0:01731d
0:1753
0
Z
0:1446
;
Z _ e exp
129324
RT
;
_ e
2
3
p ln
W
i
W
p
2
ln
H
i
H
p
2
ln
W
i
W
p
ln
H
i
H
p
( )1
2
v=l;
4
where d
0
is the grain size before deformation in lm, Z is ZenerHolloman parameter, _ e is strain rate in s
1
, T is
the rolling temperature in K, and R is the gas constant, W
i
; W
p
are equivalent width of incoming stock and
outgoing stock respectively in m, H
i
; H
p
are equivalent height of incoming stock and outgoing stock respec-
tively in m, v is rolling speed in m/s and l is contact length in m.
3.2.2. Static recrystallization and grain growth model
The model for static recrystallization kinetics is based on the modied Avrami equation [12] which incor-
porates an empirical time constant for 50% recrystallization t
0.5
[911,13,1517]
X
s
1 exp 0:693
t
t
0:5
n
; 5
n 6:1 10
6
e
0:02
d
0:30
0
exp
18400
RT
;
t
0:5
4:5 10
5
e
1:0
d
0:6
0
exp
6900
RT
3:6
_ e
0:28
;
d
SRX
343e
0:5
d
0:4
0
exp
45000
RT
; 6
d
2
d
2
SRX
4:0 10
7
t t
0:95
exp
113000
RT
t 6 1 s; 7
d
7
d
7
SRX
1:5 10
27
t t
0:95
exp
400000
RT
t > 1 s; 8
where X
s
is static recrystallizatioon volume fraction, e is strain, d
SRX
is grain diameter after complete static
recrystallization in lm, d is grain diameter after growth in lm, t is pass interval time in second, t
0.5
and
t
0.95
are, respectively, corresponding to 50%, 95% recrystallization in second.
3.2.3. Meta-dynamic recrystallization and grain growth model
If the softening mechanism is meta-dynamic recrystallization,the volume fraction and grain size of recrys-
tallization can be given by following equations [9,10,13,1517]:
X
m
1 exp 0:693
t
t
0:5
1:5
!
; 9
t
0:5
1:1 Z
0:8
exp
230000
RT
; Z _ e exp
300000
RT
;
d
MRX
26000 Z
0:23
; 10
d
2
d
2
MRX
2:2 10
7
t t
0:95
exp
113000
RT
t 6 1 s; 11
d
7
d
7
MRX
4:2 10
27
t t
0:95
exp
400000
RT
t > 1 s; 12
where X
m
is the volume fraction of meta recrystallizaton, Z is ZenerHolloman parameter, d
MRX
is the grain
size in lm after complete meta-dynamic recrystallization.
Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269 1263
3.2.4. Partial recrystallization
If there is only partial recrystallization between passes, the average grain size at the entrance to the next
stand can be evaluated from a law of mixtures type of relation that takes the softened and non-softened
grains inherited from the previous pass into account [1,18], The average grain size (in lm) is given by
Eq. (13), and accumulated strain is calculated according to formula (14)
d
0i1
X
4=3
i
d
RX
i
1 X
i
2
d
0i
; 13
De 1 X
i
e
i
; 14
where d
0i+1
is the average grain size entrance to the i + 1 stand in lm, d
0i
is grain size entrance to the i stand in
lm, d
RX
i
is grain size in lm when recrystallization completes, X
i
is volume fraction of recrystallization, and De
is residual strain in percentage.
3.3. Microstructureproperty model
A grain size-modied Avrami equation has been used to characterize the kinetics of austenite-to-pearlite
transformation during Stelmor process. The exponent n and m in the kinetic equation are compared with those
in the relevant literature [1,19,20].
3.3.1. Decomposition model of austenite to pearlite
The additivity rule has been employed to calculate the incubation time prior to the start of the pearlite
transformation, furthermore the phase transformation [21]. The fraction X transformed in the matrix at
any given temperature is a function of the proportion of the fraction X and the transformation temperature
T, namely
_
X f X; T [22,23]. The non-isothermal transformation kinetics can be described as the sum of a
series of the small isothermal transformation [24,25].
The volume fraction of pearlite transformation after the starting of pearlite transformation and the inter-
lamellar spacing of pearlite can be calculated as follows [6]:
F 1 expbt
2
; 15
ln b A
1
A
2
D A
3
T;
S
1
p
0:21 0:0703 DT; 16
where F is the volume fraction of phase transformation in percentage, t is transformation time in second, D is
austenite grain size in lm before phase transformation, T is phase transformation temperature in C, A
1
, A
2
,
A
3
is empirical coecients depend on steel composition, S
p
is interlamellar spacing of pearlite in lm, and DT is
undercooling degree of phase transformation in C.
3.3.2. Mechanical propertiesstructure relationships
Microstructural parameters calculated by the models are converted to the mechanical property information
by using various empirical regression formulas [26,27].
Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of pearlitic steels depends on the interlamellar spacing and was calculated
according to the equations proposed by Gladman [28]; On the basis of experimental data, the following equa-
tions of the strength and reduction of area have been obtained:
r
b
B
1
B
2
S
2
p
B
3
Mn; 17
w C
1
C
2
D
1
2
C
3
Mn C
4
V
1
2
; 18
where r
b
is UTS in MPa, S
p
is interlamellar spacing of pearlite in lm, Mn is manganese content in wt%, B
1
,
B
2
, B
3
, C
1
, C
2
, C
3
, C
4
are constants determined for each steel on the basis of experimental data, V is cooling
rate in C/s.
1264 Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269
4. Simulation of microstructure and mechanical properties
4.1. Simulation software
Based on the models above with empirically determined coecients, a simulating software is programmed
by Visual Basic, and can be run on a personal computer. The ow chart of simulation is given in Fig. 2. With
this software the temperature proles on the rolling line and the surface temperature on the Stelmor conveyor
are calculated. Furthermore, the austenite grain size on each rolling pass, the volume fraction of pearlite trans-
formation, interlamellar spacing of pearlite transformation and mechanical properties etc., are all predicted.
4.2. Validation of simulation
Industrial application of the comprehensive model has been carried out on eutectoid steels for high speed
wire rods (Table 1) in order to validate the models. The comparisons of calculated with measured rolling
Fig. 3. Comparison of measured with calculated temperature of 82B wire, 12.5.
Fig. 4. Comparison of measured with predicted temperature of the wire along Stelmor conveyor.
Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269 1265
Table 2
Stelmor air forcing cooling condition
Calculation Measure Steel
grade
Diameter
(mm)
Initial billet
temperature
(C)
LH
temperature
(C)
Stelmor
speed
(ms
1
)
Open of fans (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
82B 12.5 1036 870 0.5/1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
82A 12.5 1036 850 0.5/1 100 100 100 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100
72A 5.5 1017 880 0.48/0.8 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
72B 10 1036 870 0.65/0.93 0 33 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 100
Fig. 5. Recrystallization fraction predicted during hot rolling of 82B wire, 12.5 mm.
Fig. 6. Predicted evolution of austenite grain size of 82B wire, 12.5 mm.
1266 Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269
temperature for 82B high carbon steel wire of 12.5 mm are given in Fig. 3, while the comparisons of cal-
culated with measured Stelmor line wire surface temperatures are illustrated in Fig. 4. The Stelmor air forc-
ing cooling condition is presented in Table 2. It is obvious that the calculation values agree well with the
measured values.
Fig. 5 presents the recrystallization fraction of austenite during the hot rolling of 82B wire, 12.5 mm. The
evolution of the austenite grain size is shown in Fig. 6. In industrial test 20 samples cut from the crop shear
before the nishing mill train (shown in Fig. 6) for each steel to measure austenite grain size, in which repre-
sentative sample been measured by the optical microscope and the scanning electronic microscope (SEM). The
comparison between measured and predicted austenite grain size of 82B wire, 12.5 mm shown in Fig. 7, the
optical microstructure and SEM is shown in Fig. 8, the gain size is 30.1 lm, while the calculated grain size is
32.8 lm (shown in Fig. 6). The nal calculated interlamellar space is 0.204 lm, which is consistent with mea-
sured value of 0.242 lm shown in Fig. 8. Fig. 9 presents the consistent the calculated with measured UTS for
the studied steels. All the calculated values were found to be in good agreement with the corresponding mea-
sured values (relative dierences is less than 5%).
Fig. 7. Comparison of measured with calculated austenite grain size at the position of the crop shear.
Fig. 8. The optical microstructure and SEM of steel 82B, 12.5 mm.
Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269 1267
5. Conclusion
An integrated mathematical model for forecasting nal microstructure and mechanical properties has been
developed. The model provide an important tool to improve the quality of long products, and to develop the
new products.
A simulating software has been programmed. The calculated results by software are in good agreement
with measured data. The software can analyze temperature eld and microstructures evolution of the rolled
steels in the high speed wire rods. The integrated mathematical model can also predict the interlamellar space
of pearlite and mechanical properties of rolled steels. It can be used to investigate the microstructures and
properties of high carbon wire rods and to provide the guidance to industry production.
The integrated mathematical model has been applied to get optimal range of the rolling parameters for the
desired mechanical properties. It is also useful for the development of new steel grades and the development of
optimized thermomechanical processing routes.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge Wuhan Iron and Steel Company Limited (WISCO) for their technical and nan-
cial support.
References
[1] J.H. Beynon, C.M. Sellars, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 35.
[2] P.C. Campbell, G.E. Ruddle, A.F. Grawley, (Eds.), Int. Symp. Accelerated Cooling of Rolled Steel, Conf. of Metallurgists, CIM,
Winnipgeg [C], MB, Canada, 1987, p. 424.
[3] G. Li, T.M. Maccagno, D.O. Bai, J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 36 (12) (1996) 1479.
[4] C. Devadas, I.V. Samarasekera, E.B. Hawbolt, Metall. Trans. A (1991) 22A.
[5] F.H. Samuel, S. Yue, J.J. Jonas, K.R. Barnes, ISIJ Int. 30 (3) (1990) 216.
[6] A. Kvma, C. Mccalloch, E.B. Hawbolt, I.V. Samarasekera, Mater. Sci. Technol. 7 (4) (1991) 360.
[7] R.D. Morales, A. Lopezg, I.M. Olivares, ISIJ Int. 30 (1) (1990) 48.
[8] A. Zua, M. Llanos, ISIJ Int. 41 (10) (2001) 1282.
[9] E. Anell, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 440.
[10] P.D. Hodgson, L.O. Hazeldon, D.L. Matthews, R.E. Gloss, in: M. Korchynsky et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International
Conference on Microalloying95, Iron and Steel Society of AIME, Warrendale, USA, 1995, p. 341.
Fig. 9. Agreement between measured and predicted UTS by comprehensive model.
1268 Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269
[11] P.D. Hodgson, R.K. Gibbs, ISIJ Int. 32 (12) (1992) 1329.
[12] P.D. Hodgson, R.K. Gibbs, in: S.Yue.-Quebec (Ed.), Proceeding of the International Symposium on Mathematical Modelling of Hot
Rolling of Steel, The Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1990.
[13] T.M. Maccagno, J.J. Jonas, P.D. Hodgson, ISIJ Int. 36 (6) (1996) 20.
[14] Y. Lee, ISIJ Int. 39 (1999) 961.
[15] T. Senuma, M. Suehiro, H. Yada, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 23.
[16] W.P. Sun, E.B. Hawbolt, ISIJ Int. 37 (10) (1997) 1000.
[17] Tadeusz. Siwechi, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 368.
[18] P.D. Hodgson, J.J. Jonas, S. Yue, Mater. Sci. Forum 9496 (1992) 715.
[19] R.D. Morales, A. Lopezg, I.M. Olivares, Ironmak. Steelmak. 18 (2) (1991) 128.
[20] E.B. Hawbolt, B. Chau, J.K. Brimacombe, Metall. Trans. 14A (1983) 803.
[21] J.S. Ye, H.B. Chang, T.Y. Hu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34A (2003).
[22] M. Umemoto, A. Hiramarsu, A. Moriya, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 306.
[23] S. Denis, D. Farias, A. Simon, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 316.
[24] P.R. Rios, Acta Mater. 53 (2005) 4893.
[25] Yutao Zhang, Dianzhang Li, Yiyi Li, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 171 (2006) 175.
[26] M. Suemro, T. Senuma, H. Yada, K. Sato, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 33.
[27] O. Kwon, ISIJ Int. 32 (3) (1992) 50.
[28] T. Gladman, Ironmak. Steelmak. 16 (1989) 241.
Y. Zhang et al. / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 12591269 1269