Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A block diagram oI the OFDM transmitter is in Iigure 1.1, The QPSK block maps the input data bits into
complex symbols. Then, the OFDM modulation is realized using an inverse Iast Fourier transIorms (IFFT).
With the complex QPSK symbol denoted as
X
k
= (0 k N -1) , the complex baseband OFDM samples are
The input to the IFFT block is
2.1.1 PAPR
PAPR is deIined as
Where E| | denotes the expectation operator.
2.1.2 Distribution of PAPR
When the number oI sub-carriers in an OFDM system is high, conventional OFDM signals can be regarded as
Gaussian noise like signals; their variable amplitude is approximately Rayleigh-distributed, and the power
distribution has a cumulative distribution Iunction given by
Commonly CCDF oI PAPR is plotted as a perIormance parameter instead oI CDF because it emphasizes the peak
amplitude excursions, while CDF emphasizes minimum values.|9||10|
533 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Chandika Mohan, Babu, Sukat Mahajan,Pokuri and Venkata Naveen
High PAPR corresponds to a wide power range which requires more complicated analog-to-digital (A/D) and
digital-to- analog (D/A) converters in order to accommodate the large range oI the signal power values.
ThereIore,
high PAPR increases both the complexity and cost oI implementation. The power ampliIiers at the transmitter
need to have a large linear range oI operation. When considering a system with a transmitting power ampliIier,
the nonlinear distortions and peak amplitude limitation introduced by the high power ampliIier (HPA) will
produce inter-modulation between the diIIerent carriers and introduce additional interIerence into the system.
This additional interIerence leads to an increase in the bit error rate (BER) oI the system. One way to avoid such
non-linear distortion and keep low BER low is to Iorce the ampliIier to work in its linear region. UnIortunately
such solution is not power eIIicient and thus is not suitable Ior wireless communication. Hence a high PAPR in
the system design should be restricted.|2|
3. PAPR Reduction Techniques
Researchers have suggested several techniques to reduce PAPR over the years. This research work presents the
simulation study and analysis three PAPR reduction techniques in this section.
1. Clipping and Filtering Technique
2. Selected Mapping Technique
3. Partial Transmit Sequence Technique
3.1 Clipping and Filtering Technique
Clipping is a way oI reducing PAPR by simply limiting the maximum amplitude oI the OFDM signal, such
that all signal values are limited to the threshold. Clipping the OFDM signal beIore ampliIication is a simple
method to limit PAPR. However clipping may cause large out oI band (OOB) and in band interIerence as it is
a nonlinear process which results in the system perIormance degradation.
A Clipping Ratio (CR) oI 0.8 means the clipping level is about 2 dB lower than the rms level and a CR oI 1.4
means the clipping level is about 3 dB higher than the rms level. Filtering aIter clipping is required to reduce the
out-oI band clipping noise. An equiripple band pass FIR Iilter with 103 coeIIicients is used in the simulation and
the oversampled OFDM signal aIter IFFT is given as
Clipping the complex OFDM baseband signal by limiting its magnitude and maintaining its phase would require
extra hardware, such as a divider, and hence might not be suitable Ior practical implementation. ThereIore, the
real band pass signal is clipped instead oI the complex baseband signal.
The clipping operation on the real band pass signal is given by
)
3.1.2 Partial Transmit Sequences (pts) Technique
In the Partial Transmit Sequence(PTS) technique, an input data block oI N symbols is partitioned into disjoint sub
blocks. The sub-carriers in each sub-block are weighted by a phase Iactor Ior that sub-block. The phase Iactors are
selected such that the PAPR oI the combined signal is minimized. But by using this technique there will be data rate
loss.
534 Elsevier Publications, 2013
2.1.3 Effect of High PAPR
Effective PAPR simulation using two stage noise shapping filtering for LTE-A carrier aggregation under robust environment
3.2 Description of the Combined Approach
Figure 3.1 shows the transmitter architecture Ior OFDMA system with the combined Noise shaping process and
PTS.
Let Xk 0, 1.N-1 be the input block oI Irequency domain modulated symbols Ior OFDM generation, where
N is the no oI Symbols in each OFDM symbol. When the clipping is perIormed with the Nyquist sampling rate
in the discrete time domain it may aIIect the high Irequency components in the in-band and the clipping noise
directly sits in the desired in-band which may degrade the BER perIormance. Hence, it is desirable to show the
CFR perIormance on the oversampled discrete time signals, typically an oversampling rate Iactor oI L _ 4 will
be used so that the PAR beIore D/A conversion accurately describes the one aIter D/A. Oversampling is also
necessary to examine the out-band distortions introduced by the noise shaping algorithm.
Fig 3.1. Description oI the Combined Approach
Architecture oI OFDM system with Combined Noise shaping and PTS technique .
Fig 3.2. Schematic Block oI Noise Shaping
The Block diagram oI the Noise shaping process is shown in Figure . To clip the peak either Cartesian or polar
clipping can be used, with Cartesian clipping the In-phase and quadrature components are clipped independently
and with polar clipping, the magnitude oI the signal is clipped while preserving the phase. While either method
can be used to limit the PAPR oI the signal, it has been shown that the polar clipping provides better results in
terms oI overall signal distortion (i.e. lower EVM and ACLR perIormance). By selecting an appropriate
535 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Chandika Mohan, Babu, Sukat Mahajan,Pokuri and Venkata Naveen
threshold Amax, the PAPR oI the signal can be maintained at a desired level. Polar clipping oI the time domain
discrete data
3.3 Algorithm
Fig 3.3. Schematic Block
4. Results
Fig 4.1. IFFT Data Input Fig 4.2. Up-Sampling (Inband And Outband Correction)
compare wlLh delayed
and lncomlng CluM
slgnal
8esulL ln Cllpplng nolse
(Ln)
Ll uslng rollo
facLor=0.22
lmpulse 8esponse h(n)
1sL sLage nolse
Shapplng ,A8
LsumaLed
8educed A8 as lnpuL
Lo 1S algorlLhm
lll1(Mulucarrler
subblocks of equal slze)
hase vecLor v=2,4
Muluply wlLh lncomlng
CluM
CCul on resulLanL
vecLor
A8 Calculauons
536 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Effective PAPR simulation using two stage noise shapping filtering for LTE-A carrier aggregation under robust environment
Fig 4.3. Clipping Noise Out Put
Fig 4.4. Low Pass Filter
Fig 4.5. a. First Stage Clipping Out Put b. PAPR Input
537 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Chandika Mohan, Babu, Sukat Mahajan,Pokuri and Venkata Naveen
Fig 4.6. Lowest PAPR Signal Fig 4.7. Noise Shaped Output For PAPR Signal
Fig 4.8. PAPR Noise Shaped With PTS Algorithm
538 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Effective PAPR simulation using two stage noise shapping filtering for LTE-A carrier aggregation under robust environment
.
Fig 4.9. Comparsion OI Noise Shaped And PTS Fig 5.Comparision OI Clipping And Noise Shaping
5. Conclusion
With increase in data rate requirements, large bandwidths are needed to support it. Higher bandwidths
(subcarriers) drastically increase the PAPR. Hence single iteration oI the clipping technique will not be
suIIicient. Multiple iterations are needed to reduce the PAPR to desired level which in turn increases the
complexity oI implementation. We propose an approach which combines Noise shaping and PTS technique
which results in the better perIormance compared to the multiple iterative techniques. An oversampling Iactor is
chosen which is greater than 4 by doing this PAR beIore D/A conversion accurately describes the one aIter D/A.
Oversampling is also necessary to examine the out-band distortions introduced by the noise shaping algorithm.
In this paper we have proposed a combined approach .PAPR reduction technique whose perIormance is better
compared to the legacy approaches where multiple iterations are needed to achieve desired PAPR while
satisIying EVM and ACLR /spectral mask constraints. The proposed technique can be an alternative solution Ior
reducing the complexity oI the multiple iterative based approaches, the only requirement would be the transmit
side inIormation (optimal phase vector combination used) to be known at the receiver to reconstruct the
baseband signal sampled discrete-time domain OFDM symbols. In this paper generating phase vector matrix is
very important as they are important in PTS algorithm. We simulated the maximum iterations with increasing
the sub block which means, Irom each sub block a resultant PAPR will be consider and among them the PAPR
which is least is considerable Ior the PAPR calculations.
539 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Chandika Mohan, Babu, Sukat Mahajan,Pokuri and Venkata Naveen
Reference
|1| SteIania Sesia, Issam TouIik, Matthew Baker, 'Lte - The Umts Long Term Evolution: From Theory to Practice, Wiley, 2nd Edition,
2011, ISBN: 9780470660256.
|2|. Zhibin Zeng; Dian Xie; Yaqian Huang, 'A Crest Factor Reduction Method in Digital Predistortion Ior Improvement oI Power
EIIiciency, International ConIerence on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering. vol 3,pp. 636 639, March 2012..
|3|. S. B. Slimane, 'Peak-to-average power ratio reduction oI OFDM signals using pulse shaping, IEEE GLOBECOM, pp. 1412-1416 vol.
3, 2000.
|4|. R. W. Bauml, R. F. H. Fischer, and J. B. Huber, 'Reducing the peak-to-average power ratio oI multicarrier modulation by selected
mapping, Electron. Lett.vol.32, no. 22, pp. 2056-2057, Oct. 1996
|5|. Tao Jiang , " An Overview: Peak to-Average Power Ratio
Reduction Techniques Ior OFDM signals" IEEE Transactions on broadcasting,vol.54,No.2,June 2008
|6|. X.Li and L.J.Cimini., (1998). 'EIIect oI clipping and Iiltering on the perIormance oI OFDM. IEEE CommunicationsLetters, (May
1998), X.Huang, J.Lu, J.Zheng, and J.Chuang.,(2001).
|7|'Reduction oI peak-to-average power ratio oI OFDM signals with companding transIorm, Electronics Letters, (April 2001) .
|8|. M.ShariI, M.Gharayi-Alkhansari, and B.H.Khalaj., (2003).'On the peak-to-average power.
|9| Pankaj Kumar Sharma, R.K. Nagaria and T.N. Sharma Power EIIiciency Improvement in OFDM System using SLM with Adaptive
Nonlinear Estimator", World Applied Sciences Journal 7 (Special Issue oI Computer & IT):.
|10| Guangyue Lu, Ping Wu and Catharina Carlemalm-Logothetis," PAPR reduction Ior real baseband OFDM signals", Signals and
Systems Division, Dept. OI Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, 2008.
|11| W. S. Ho, A. S. Madhukumar, and F. Chin, 'Peak-to-average power reduction using partial transmit sequences: a suboptimal approach
based on dual layered phase sequencing, IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 225231, Jun. 2003.
|12|S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, 'An overview oI peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques Ior multicarrier transmission, IEEE
Wireless Communications., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 56-65, Apr. 2005.
|13| T. Jiang, W. Xiang, P. C. Richardson, J. Guo and G. Zhu, 'PAPR Reduction oI OFDM Signals Using Partial Transmit Sequences With
Low Computational Complexity, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 53, no. 3, pp.719-724, Sep. 2007.
|14|T. Jiang and G. Zhu, 'Nonlinear companding transIorm Ior reducing peak-to-average power ratio oI OFDM signals, IEEE Trans. on
Broadcasting, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 342346, Sept. 2004.
540 Elsevier Publications, 2013
Index
C
Clipping and filtering technique, 534
D
Density functional theory (DFT)
transform, 532
I
Inter-channel interference (ICI), 531
O
OFDM, 531532
architecture of, 535
block diagram of, 533
Orthogonal, 531
P
PAPR
algorithm, 536
defined, 533
distribution of, 533
effect, 533534
reduction techniques, 534535
Partial Transmit Sequence (PTS) technique, 534535
W
Wireless communication, 534