1

Anything that is, spins and is in a constant self-referral system with something (The Aether) because
everything has to know what where and how to be in 3d. Looking for the organising principle of
matter energy, the DNA of matter
How waves are produced due to pole swapping or kinetic inversion.
The DNA of matter, instructions for separation.
What, Where, When, How, Who, Why (related to an individuated physical entity).
You need a framework where something can spin, is allowed to spin in.
Everything that is spins, every atom (so called).
Either something is moving through a field or a field is moving through something. What fields are
generated within the Aether and how do we interact with it for light, power, flight, heat and movement?
Some ideas to help interpret the following ideas.
3 forms of planetary motion
Orbit, Spin and Circulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPUStEemNzg Magnetic fields visualised. Coronal loops.
The difference between a solid and a field is that any spinning object makes a field. Any solid object is made
of spinning smaller objects.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNpXOb0xl6o Water drops orbit a Knitting needle in zero gravity.
Whereas two spinning fields produce material - if they have approached their point of intersection on a
positive temperature gradient. Which follows a Cycloidal Space Curve (CSC) in three dimensions and maybe
seen as the conjoining of two opposite forces Centripetal and centrifugal. A CSC in 2 dimensions would be
like watching a point of light on a moving wheel. Illustration below.

Taking Orbit as centrifugal and axial spin as centripetal, this is possible only when they are both harmonic on
a CSC the hyperbolic being the best example. This takes the CSC from x y coordinates to 3d z
I suppose that two spinning fields come together at 90 degrees under x,y coordinates the z coordinate is a
falling or rising that is generated by any mass (you need something in order to make more something). The
idea of mass is used here because the said mass would generate an effect known as gravity. This is a vector
for the 2 opposing spins mentioned above.
However the gravitational effect is produced by the 3 types of planetary motion. Again you need to be
working in an established field of matter and energy that is stable in order to produce these effects.
The nature of the spin/s.
The generation of the original field is stabilised in our knowing by the vortex 1/n x N = K.
2

This can be expanded to the torus and mirrored to the dual torus, one we can see i.e. tornado or whirl pool,
the other is in counter space*, so we see that in our mathematics.
The work of the projective geometry group and the maths generated by Nick Thomas. (Referenced below)
http://www.nct.anth.org.uk/path.htm
These effects are as a result of the object staying in a particular place for a particular time Ref: Greb1. Insert
detail of sun flower from grebenikov
Also that the reason effects are noticed only after a certain time is the swirls caused in the Aether.
Mathematics being the exploration of space without usual physical experience donated to our physicality by
our senses.
The one in this realm, which stabilises all matter however brief, is shown best in water the vortex - plain at
infinity to point at infinity. *See comment on projective geometry.


profile of hyperbolic.

Simplified view of molecule using
hyperbolic and kinetic inversion.
High spin rate causes high inversion
rate, as the (electrons invert across the
hyperbolic the frequency of this we call
X material, copper, iron etc.
The picture on the left is of a free moving
vortex leaving its exit hole. Many air-core
hyperbolics that are studied are constrained
in that the containing vessel is a hyperbolic
shape, when free to move about relative to
the exit hole only the edge goes over the exit
hole.
From an observation of a split vortex bottle in
2005.
3

There are many complex shapes in a water vortex. I named some from my observations such as nested
cylinders, potters wheel effect and a few others. I had not seen these geometries described anywhere else.
See Twistedwaterstarter videos on u-tube for further details.
In looking at the vortex represented above bare in mind that there is a complexity not yet fully explored


The interesting thing that is missed is that any spinning object, no matter how perfect in construction will
experience a wobble.
This wobble induces kinetic inversion, pole swapping. This pole swapping across the centre causes that
centre to ring like a bell, this ringing we call matter. There may be more than one spinning so called electron.
With more than one the ringing mentioned above gives a variety of flavours or matters to the ringing.
The wobble can be caused by any tiny perturbation from a field.
Not only do particles experience this but the hyperbolic they are falling in will also experience this inversion.
Stability is the progress of a particle through a vortex on a CSC that is in synchronisation or harmonic with its
spin rate.
If a particle is moving on a path that is within a vortex (or an induced path in same) the tightening spiral of
the vortex will match the particle exactly and its spin rate will be increasing exponentially.
The conversion of orbital rotation centrifugal, to spin centripetal. As a ball following two rails starts its orbital
journey at the top of the vortex. Following a CSC the orbit tightens exactly as the spin rate increases. The
ball rolls with its base pointing south and its spin axis West East. At a certain point this changes so that its
spin axis is North South and its base will point West East. This as it approaches the vertical. At a certain
point close to the ?? point the two combine Orbit and spin. The orbital rate is reduced to near zero and the
An air core water vortex does not centre over
the exit hole; only the edge goes over the exit
hole. It then goes round the exit hole. If the
vortex is stable it follows the edge, if the
vortex is unstable it moves away from the exit
hole and then back following an elliptical
path.
From an observation of a split vortex bottle in
2005.
Top down view of
vortex exit hole. The
circle on the right in
pale blue is the top
vortex.
4

spin rate is increased exponentially. At a certain rate of spin the ball disappears from this realm and is
energy.
So it will not exchange poles or flip. It is falling away from instability as its spin rate increases.
If any point on the particle so spinning sweeps its entire surface during one pole inversion (from the top to
the bottom and back to the top 720 degrees) that we call matter.
If the energy that is a particle elongates its sweeping spin on a hyperbolic that = energy
To stabilise a disintegrating particle it will have to be introduced to a vortex that exactly matches its spin
rate.
To create an exotic particle the same plus a nudge from another field, perhaps magnetic, or organic
(Grebenikov 2) Bee cone.
In this regard the water vortex is the inverse of that process. I am not sure about this.
The introduction of oxygen and hydrogen in the correct field (universal field) produces water. Water is
everywhere and is the base line reset button.
For any particle depending on the rate of spin the same process will ensue.
It will rotate its spin axis through 180 degrees describing a cycloidal space curve as shown on the MIR Russian
space station wing nut illustration and animation, link below.
Note: direction of rotation remains the same. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LR5hkgfRPno

Stills from animation.
The crossing point of orbital entities known at present as electrons is what Schauberger called the energy
cannon, where he is referring to the inwinding flows of a river. This point is where a ford forms; all matter is
dropped before starting the winding process again. The dropping point/ ford is matter.
The pole exchange rate will be proportional to its spin rate.
Spin axis relative to line of travel or orbital vector.
In the example above the spin axis is in line with the direction of travel. The Earths spin axis is 77 degrees
(obliquity) so it is upright in relation to direction of travel.
The alteration of spin allows the North Pole to experience the energy of the South Pole and has been named
kinetic inversion.
The holding in stasis of this rotation produces turbulence in the field and we get exotic effects, such as inertia
less movement or time dilation suggesting that time is a result of pole exchange on a falling or rising of
5

orbital vector. Atoms with more than one shell so called, swap poles across the nucleus, as they do this we
might expect a collision, but waves move through each other. (supposition). Further note Orbital vector is a
misnomer because all that orbits something else makes a path through space called a cycloidal space curve.
Like the ringing of a strange bell the emanations of this event is what we take to be matter.
Two streams of energy/fields at right angles to each other produce a rotation.
Sometimes trees grow in a spiral, the reason is they are growing over the confluence of two streams of
energy, such as underground water, as far as they are concerned they are growing straight relative to the
influencing vectors in the third dimension, the fields can be 2 dimensional. (supposition).
With this in mind we can see that crossing fields will generated an object/matter at their X point. The object
will extrude itself in the 3rd dimension i.e. the resultant of two crossing fields is matter but only if they have
followed a particular path. (supposition)
If we halt the pole exchange on CSC (Cycloidal Space Curve) at 90 degrees compensation will have to ensue
or else the whole of creation would have to rotate about the object so halted.
This suggests an elastic medium (mystically called the Aether) which provides a buffer or spring to attenuate
the effect locally.
This attenuation does not stop field emanations.
If by some means we produce two field emanations and cross these they will/should produce new materials.
The potential new materials are already mapped by Walter Russells serpentine model of the atomic table,
we just extend it and as we do we will see the relationship of intersecting fields and be able to tailor matter.
In these circumstances anything spinning creates the whole.
1 rotation or spin to one orbit wound once and going into the z direction reducing in diameter on a
hyperbolic ration. The curve produced can be altered, the lambda expression Nick Thomas uses to produce
his curves from Projective Geometry.


The transformations concerned are projective ones characteristic of projective
geometry, which are linear because neither straight lines nor planes become curved
when moved by them, and incidences are preserved (this is a simplification, but will
serve us here). They allow more freedom than simple rotations and translations, in
particular incorporating expansion and contraction. Apart from the path curves they
leave a tetrahedron invariant in the most general case. George Adams studied these
curves as he thought they would provide a way of understanding how space and
counter space interact. A particular version he looked at was for a transformation
which leaves invariant two parallel planes, the line at infinity where they meet and an
axis orthogonal to them. This is a plastic transformation rather than a rigid one (like
rotation) and a typical path curve together with the invariant planes and axis is shown
to the left. Ref:- http://www.nct.anth.org.uk/path.htm
6

Oloids
Oloids move the object through its own shape variant of a CSC.
i.e. if it is in a vortex in sync with its spin it will not flip poles but rotate them as a ball would rolling through a
twisting pipe.
Pole flipping in small particles can be very fast, in a planet relatively slow or stopped by external
synchronised forces (Moon Earth equilibrium?)

Foster Gambles rendering of the atom.
Like metronomes do it will self-synchronise with its vortex, the vortex will adjust to the spin rate if allowed
to.
So we can bring radiation to zero by introducing it to a hyperbolic at a particular point or gradient.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE
Ref Kesheva Bahts work on the spiral solar system, we do not orbit the sun.
What we call sunlight only becomes such about 300k from the surface of the Earth.
The reason for this is the emanations of the Sun over a huge spectrum only convert to light after passing
through the magnetosphere and atmospheric layers, the major transducer being water our eyes are made of
water. So light only becomes what we call it when radiation has been transduced by our various atmospheres
or energetic shells.
Consciousness has no spin if it did it would be harmonic with matter and we would not see anything.
Detection of a vibration is not the vibration. JB see Magrits pipe.
In my work with the ideas of Schauberger I made a discovery, which enabled me to take pictures of
structures that water makes, this I called WBA or Water Brass Art. Galleries at www.waterbrassart.com
In order to fund research I sell pictures of water made using Brass sheets and natural water.
7

When water is poured onto brass sheets a pattern is formed. Depending on the orientation of the plates to
the flow a variety of patterns show up.
In still water very little is revealed however fast moving jets or streams show great detail, see
Waterbrassart.com and galleries.
All numbers being vectors describe a point and its movement on the hyperbolic because they go round a
hole that makes zero.
If your numbers do not describe/show the spin rate on the hyperbolic your formula is incorrect.
You cannot go up the hyperbolic, as a particle you can go up, on a spiral, in a central structure called (by me)
nested cylinders.

Further unworked ideas.
1. The container that best suits the water molecule (needs expansion comment ref the Oloid)
2. Kinetic inversion also happens at the exit hole of the hyperbolic.
3. Moving matter through its own shape in a container that is its shape shows the evolution of the
heart geometry and the most efficient way to mix materials or create emulsions. Schauberger knew
this through another method he named implosion. The gains are seen because the three forms of
planetary motion are taken as near as possible to the anomaly point, the edge others call black holes.
4. In an experiment I conducted I found that the vortex in water does not centre over the hole it is
falling through, ONLY the edge of the vortex goes over the hole. The vortex will go round the edge of
the hole and may move away on an ellipse accelerating as it returns to orbit the hole it falls through.
5. All numbers are vectors describing an effect of constant change towards nothing. That nothing we
call zero, we enjoy the dance round zero.
6. We must change our relationship to numbers. We cannot yet show the experience of a particle in a
hyperbolic because it is a continuous (analogue) path. This path has a direct bearing on the
particle/object and the system it is in, rather than identifying just its position and vector.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4V9AG_qztk
Note 1 on consciousness reference: - If you imagine a bicycle wheel projected on a screen (panning shot, side
on) and that wheel is bouncing down a hill, the screen would be moving and bouncing with the wheel. The
frame of reference is the screen and it works better if it does not move with the image.
Note 2 Conversion of orbit to spin or bringing the orbital rate as close as possible to the spin centre.
Spin = Centripetal.
Orbit =Centrifugal.
3 forms of planetary motion spin orbit circulation.
Note 3 In my journeying (I call it driving miss daisy) I met some beings; well it was as if they joined me when I
was surfing a wave of my own creation. These dudes joined in, they liked what I was doing and asked if I
could do more, Id probably said yes, but to be honest I didnt know what I was doing, then I had an idea and
8

said you like this? Yes we dowell what have you got to trade? They had no idea what this meant so I
explained trade as best I could; they said what do you want? I want to know how spin and vortex and
hyperbollocks work ok? ok they said, next day this fell into my head .
Thanks guys, Ill be working up another creation for you to surf.
Patrick Flannigans work with sound and the Neurophone. Rotate a field through a mass and tune to
resonance dissonance.
Note StanTennens work Dan Winter. The holy grail fractal Space Curve Recursive.

3 = x coordinate 5 = Y coordinate 8 = Z coordinate fall rate for local gravity?
On the maths front, I think all numbers are vectors that go round zero, showing the hyperbolic and that
means the only hole number is zero. Everything spins and when its precessional wobble matches its spin axis
it inverts poles by rotating said spin axis through 180 deg. it conserves angular momentum and spins the
same way.