1

ANPQP REVISION
ANPQP REVISION
Version 2.0
Version 2.0
2
Detailed Contents of Revision
Detailed Contents of Revision
Current Problems and Revision Points
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP
ANPQP
Revision
Revision
3
Detailed Contents of Revision
Detailed Contents of Revision
Current Problems and Revision Points
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP
ANPQP
Revision
Revision
4
1Time-consuming
Take much time to reach information one demands.
It takes much time to prepare and submit document because there are many kind of
documents.
2Difficult to understand
Because the number of documents required to submit differs depending on parts
assessment level, it is hard to know which document is applied to which parts.
We dont know what and how to write List of sub-supplier because there are no
example and format of it.
Difficult to understand ANPQP because there is no description about the relationship
between each phase of ANPQP and Nissan project process.
3. Requirement regarding ISO/TS16949
What will it be in the future about the necessity to obtain ISO/TS16949 certificate?
Linkage between ISO/TS16949 and ANPQP is unclear because there is no correlation
table.
Problems of Current Situation
Problems of Current Situation
Main VOCs about Current ANPQP
5
Problems of current situation
Problems of current situation
(1) Too much volume (the number of pages and
required documents) and difficult to understand
(VOC)
(2) There are some ineffective requirements
6
Revision Point of ANPQP
Revision Point of ANPQP
Change ANPQP structure
Change structure of activity
requirement page
Add FAQ page
(3) To make it easy to
understand
- Change document submission
frequency according to the
risk
- Reduce the number of documents
(2) To optimize document
requirements
according to the risk to
make it efficient
Delete activity requirements of
management related
e.g. Senior Management Support
Reinforce activity requirements
e.g. Sub Supplier Management
(1) To contain fundamental
activities for product
realization to make it
practical and realistic
Revision Point Basic Revision Concept
7
Detailed Contents of Revision
Detailed Contents of Revision
Current Problems and Revision Points
Current Problems and Revision Points
ANPQP
ANPQP
Revision
Revision
8
Submission Level of
Each Document
Activity
Requirement
Output Documents
Completion Instruction of
each document
Specified / Recommended Form
and Completion example
Format of ANPQP Revised Version
Format of ANPQP Revised Version
9
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Add Nissan require suppliers to make
regular tests on Important A/B, OBD and
regulatory parts
Regular tests on
regulatory parts except
Important A/B is not
specified
Special
Characteristics
Control
(Nissan only)
Extend scope of submission to M/H of
assessment level.
Sub-Supplier list
submission is requested
only for Module parts
Add format named Component Supply
Chain Chart (CSCC)
There is no format for
Sub-Supplier List
Sub Supplier
Management
Add Review and update the DFMEA /
Product AMDEC whenever the design is
changed or modified
Add Describe the preparation schedule for
the completion of the design, manufacture,
inspection & buy off of all tooling. The
schedule shall also include the date of
tooling design reviews and trials. Specify
the production place of tool/ die and trial
place. on Supplier Master Schedule
DCI(Document Completion Instruction)
After change
Action at design change
is not specified
Design FMEA/
Product
AMDEC
Insufficient explanation
of production
tool/die/gauge schedule
on Supplier Master
Schedule
Supplier
Master
Schedule
Before change
ANPQP
requirements
Main Changes
10
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Clarify minimum contents
requirement of Design Review Record
on DCI
Minimum contents
requirement of Design
Review Record is not
clarified
Design Review
Record
Add This sample size must be
statistically valid or otherwise agreed
with Renault/ Nissan
-Add When requested, the supplier
shall attend the Renault/ Nissan trial
assembly activities to review the
assembled part condition and confirm
Renault/ Nissan assembly
requirements.
-Add Carry out Continuous
Conformance Testing for functional
and performance requirements in
Phase5 activity
After change Before change ANPQP
requirements
Concerning sample size of
test is not specified
Supplier Test Plan
& Report
-Joint check activity
between Renault/Nissan
and supplier is not
specified
-Continuous conformance
testing after SOP is not
specified
Design
Verification and
Product / Process
Validation
Main Changes
11
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Add detail explanation of the item
in Document Description of DCI.
There is no detail explanation
of Gauge approval activity &
Reports.
Gauge
Specification /
Approval Sheet
Add Train all operators based on
the work instructions
Operator training is not
specified.
Work Instruction
Add detail explanation of
Process characteristics on DCI
Insufficient explanation of
Process characteristics
Control Plan
Add the supplier shall establish
root cause(s) and implement
effective countermeasure(s) to
meet the requirements by the
time of SOP.
After change Before change ANPQP
requirements
Requirement of that if
process capability
requirements are not
achieved is all product shall
be subjected to additional
confirmation activities only.
Process
Capabilities Study
and Improvement
Main Changes
12
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Add Apply the
countermeasure to other
similar parts/ processes
(horizontal deployment)
Requirement of
countermeasure to other
similar parts/ processes
(horizontal deployment) is not
clear.
Non Conforming
Product
Management
Add document format of
contact directory as a project
There is no document format
as a project
Supplier Contact
Directory
Add minimum content
requirement of this plan in DCI.
Detail content requirement of
Ramp-up activity plan is not
specified.
Clarify definition and
requirement of Ramp-up
activity.
Detail requirement of Ramp-up
activity is not specified.
Activities during
Ramp-up
Add Review and update the
PFMEA whenever the process
design is changed or modified.
Action of process change for
Process FMEA is not specified
Analysis of Process
Potential Failures
and Effects
After change Before change ANPQP
requirements
Main Changes
13
(1) Specify requirement of complying ISO/TS16949 as
ANPQP Alliance Policy.
(2) Change structure so that requirements can be
recognized at one view.
(3) Make clear the purpose, requirement, its contents, and
output document of each activity requirement.
(4) Change structure of Document Completion Instruction
3
3
-
-
1) Structure Improvement for Easy Understanding
1) Structure Improvement for Easy Understanding
14
1. The supplier is expected to provide products that meet or
exceed Renault / Nissan Quality, Cost and Delivery
targets.
2. Suppliers are required to comply with all ISO/TS 16949
requirements. This is a minimum requirement for the
application of ANPQP.
3. Renault / Nissan conduct an audit by using the Alliance
evaluation audit tools (ASES/ASAS-P).
4. The supplier is required to rigorously apply ANPQP.
Outline
Clarify compliance with ISO/TS16949 as a minimum
requirement in applying ANPQP.
(However, Nissan would not request the certification of
ISO/TS16949. In case a supplier delivers parts to Renault, the
supplier is required to get certification of ISO/TS16949.)
(1) ANPQP Alliance Policy
(1) ANPQP Alliance Policy
15
ANPQP
1. Organization
& Planning
2. Design Completion
3. Off-tool 4. Off-process
5. Post SOP
2.5 Prototype Control
Plan
3.6 Pre-Production
Control Plan
4.6 Production
Control Plan
2.4 Design Review
3.12 Design Review
4.10 Design Review
4.2 Process
Capability Study
2.18 Initial Process
Capability Study Plan
2.19 Production
Preparation Monitoring
3.8 Final Process
Capability Study Plan
3.11 Production
Preparation Monitoring
4.9 Production Preparation
Monitoring
Current ANPQP
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Requirements at One View
Activities required at each phase were listed
indivisually
No consistency through phases, and hard to
understand
Hard and demanding to find requirements of
each phase
16
Submission Level of
Each Document
Activity
Requirement
Output Documents
Completion Instruction of
each document Specified / Recommended Form
and Completion example
ANPQP V2.0
Requirement items;
54 items to 23 activities
List the requirements through all phases at 1 page
Make overall format simple
Easy to understand the contents of required activity
through all phases
Possible to recognize requirements at one view
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Requirements at One View
17
Integrate submission level from 6 to 4 patterns
Work
Instructions, DR
Record, etc.
3
Document completed
by supplier.
Submitted to
Renault/ Nissan only
by request.
Supplier Test
Report, Process
Flow Chart, etc.
2
Document completed
by supplier and
submitted to Renault/
Nissan.
Design Change
Request, Process
Change Request,
8D CCR, etc.
( )
Document completed
by supplier if
neccesary.
Engineering
Drawings,
Control Plan,
PSW, etc.
1
Document completed
by supplier and
submitted to
Renault/Nissan for
signature.
Example of
Document
Sym
bol
Submission Level
r
Retain (Submit if required)
a
Prepare and Submit only when
required by Renault and Nissan
R
Submit (Review by Renault /
Nissan and supplier)
S
Submit
Based on experience, Renault / Nissan
have identified these as the main
documents subject to change through
the development and production
phases of any project. Therefore these
documents should be submitted when
they are initially produced and
subsequently, only when the content
has changed.
A
Approve
Symbol Submission Level
Current ANPQP
ANPQP V2.0
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Requirements at One View
18
1.3 Sub Supplier Management
Description
Renault and / or Nissan requests that the first tier supplier identifies all the potential sub supplier
being considered for new projects.
In certain cases, Renault and / or Nissan will specify the sub-supplier to be used by the first tier
supplier.
The supplier must deploy a product development system to ensure that its sub-suppliers shall design,
manufacture and deliver a product in accordance with Renault and / or Nissan QCD targets.
This procedure shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan.
Note:
It is the responsibility of the first tier supplier to manage all their sub suppliers in order that all
ANPQP requirements are met in full by the first-tier supplier. For further guidance on the
management of suppliers which are specified by Renault and / or Nissan, refer to the appropriate
RFQ file(s).
Within all phase activities the first tier supplier shall ensure, through the use of project reviews, that
they are compliant with ANPQP requirements at phase 2,3 & 4 and that all ongoing design,
process and facility changes are managed during phase 5.
The updated 'List of Sub Suppliers' shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan and / or the Process
Flow Chart.
Required Result
For module parts, the completed 'List of Sub Suppliers' with their respective evaluation levels (in

Current ANPQP
The purpose of activities was not clear
Users may conduct activities without
understanding the purpose of activities.
Hard to understand the consistency of requirements
from the planning stage to SOP
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
its Contents, and Output Document
19
Sub-Supplier Management
Activity purpose:
To manage all sub-suppliers to ensure products delivered to Renault / Nissan
achieve QCD targets.
Tier 1 suppliers shall be responsible for the management and approval of
parts quality and associated documentation for all sub-supplier's (including
those specified by Renault / Nissan) unless otherwise agreed in the RFQ.
No sub-supplier changes are allowed in phase 4, unless otherwise agreed by
Renault/ Nissan.
-Apply the change
management
activity before any
CSCC change.
-No sub-
supplier
changes
Update the CSCC
whenever there are
any changes to the
sub-suppliers.
-Finalise the CSCC
document.
Select potential sub-
suppliers and make
the draft of CSCC
document.
4
Component Supply Chain Chart(CSCC Output
Document
-Identify all the sub-suppliers for the production phase, complete CSCC (Component Supply Chain Chart),
to understand the complete supply chain.
-Select and evaluate sub-suppliers based on their ability to supply products which satisfy Renault/ Nissan
QCD target .
-Criteria for selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation shall be established including quality history and/or
second or third party audit results.
-Deploy a product development system to ensure that sub-suppliers design, manufacture and deliver a
product in accordance with Renault / Nissan QCD targets.
Activity
Content
5 3 2 1 Phase
ANPQP2.0
Clarify the important requirements, why this is
required, and what to do in referring to each content
of requirement.
Possible to find activities of each phase
at 1 page.
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
its Contents, and Output Document
20
List of Sub Suppliers
The following items are expected as a minimum content of this document:
-Product to be supplied (cross reference to completed part drawing)
Supplier name and location
-Confirm whether this is an existing supplier
If so, state length of supplier relationship and relevant experience of this
type of product
-Clarify which parts are "Customer Designated" parts and / or supplied
parts from Renault / Nissan or others
-State relevant internationally recognised standard(s), with which the
product will be in conformance (ISO, DIN, JIS etc.)
-Key dimensions / weight of product as supplied
-Surface treatment or protective method to be used for transit / storage
-Component part numbers in the case of modular assemblies
The supplier shall comply with the Control of Documents and Control of
Records requirements of ISO/TS16949.
SUPPLIER DOCUMENT COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS
There was no description except for document
completion method.
Why document needed to be completed was not
brought to suppliers, and this might make the
document completion itself the purpose.
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
Current ANPQP
21
Document Completion Instruction
Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)
Key Points
Key Points
The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which visualises visualises the structure of the structure of
the component supply chain. the component supply chain.
The CSCC shall be used to reinforce sub supplier management. The CSCC shall be used to reinforce sub supplier management.
Minimum Content Requirements
Minimum Content Requirements
The CSCC shall cover all tiers of the supply chain down to raw m The CSCC shall cover all tiers of the supply chain down to raw material level (including aterial level (including
grease, sealant, solder, etc.). grease, sealant, solder, etc.).

Document Description Document Description

Describe Supply Chain Structure with component parts' name. Supply Chain Structure and their
component parts' name
Describe Part name and Part number delivered to
Renault/Nissan.
Part name and Part number delivered
to Renault /Nissan
Completion Instructions Item
Clarify the key points and minimum requirements of the
document.
Easy to understand the purpose of document
completion and function of the document.
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
ANPQP2.0
22
3-2) Add FAQ
Example
There is in the Ground Rule of
Document Submission.
Where is the Data Retention
requirement of documents?
We added the format for project
in this revision, so please
submit it for all projects
including miner changes
projects. In addition, for the
contact of head office function
and manufacturing
Shall the Supplier Contact
Directory be submitted for each
project? Is it included also any
miner change project or KD
project?
Yes. Does the scope of Sub supplier
include both raw material
supplier and parts supplier?
Answer Question
23
Following items were revised according to
VOC (Voice of Customer) from suppliers and
Renault/ Nissan internal.
Others
4. Other Changes; Document revision
4. Other Changes; Document revision
Document integrated Document name changed
Document eliminated Document added
Improvement document format (easy to input)
Improvement of each document header
24
Document integrated
Installation Plan
Internal Concern Management Procedures
Action Plan to achieve customers QCD targets
Document eliminated
Facility Site Transfer
Summary
Process/ Facility Site Change
Request
Revision document name
Process Change Summary
Current document name
4. Other Changes; Document revision
4. Other Changes; Document revision
25
Document name and format changed
-
-
Small
change
Supplier Contact Directory
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Name
changed
Process Instruction
Supplier Test Report
Supplier Status
Report
Supplier Plan
Sub-supplier List
Document name(V1.4
Work Instruction
Supplier Test Plan & Report
Supplier Proeduction
Preparation Monitoring Status
Report
Supplier Production Preparation
Monitoring Plan
Component Supply Chain Chart
CSCC
Document name (V2.0)
-
-
-
-
Add
Format
4. Other Changes; Document revision
4. Other Changes; Document revision
26
Renault existing documents have been included in
ANPQP Version 2.0 :
MQA
Supplier Recommendations
Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
Supplier EDI agreement
EDI Submission Warrant
Part Status Report
4. Other Changes;
4. Other Changes;
Renault included documents
Renault included documents
27
Changed phase name (Phase 1 & 5) however keep phase
concept.
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Requirements
Review and
Planning
Requirements
Review and
Planning
Ramp-up
and Mass Production
28
Off Tool
confirmation
Supplier
Manufacturing
Approval
(AFF)
Sourcing
confirmation
Design Completion
Off Process
Feed Back
Analysis
Ramp-up and
Mass Production
Organisation
et Planning
Part
Submission
Warrant
(PSW)
Off Tool
Tooling
release
RFQ
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Requirements review
and Planning
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Requirements review
and Planning
29
Investment
authorisations
100%
Suppliers
AFF
Supplier
nomination
100% suppliers
nominations
100% IOD 100% PSW
PSW
I.O.D
Vehicle Project Milestones Vehicle Project Milestones
Supplier
Manufacturing
Approval (AFF)
Tooling Go
Ahead
Suppliers
nominations
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
100%
facilities
in place
RFQ
AMSLOT AMPS/ABTO AF/SOP
ENVU/EVIP
Pre contrat Contrat ROP/TGA
For all products
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
30
100% nominations 100% nominations
100% 100% Tooling Tooling Go Go Ahead Ahead
100% IOD 100% IOD
100% APF (AEI) 100% APF (AEI)
Powertrain Project Milestones
100% AFF 100% AFF
AF Pre contrat AMPS Contrat AMIOD AMEI
IOD
machined
IOD ass.
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
31
Off tool
Off process
Design Completion
Slot PT1 PT2
Supplier
selection
SOP
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 5
Phase 4
Sourcing
Confirmation
Tooling
Release
Parts
Approval
Tooling Release
ET
DDlot
DF
lot
DFC
lot
VClot PTlot
Slot
Process
V-3P
Process
(Phase 1)

Ramp-up and
Mass production
Requirements
Review and Planning
Requirements
Review and Planning
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
32