0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
33 vizualizări3 pagini
Students overall evaluation on the quality of their learning experiences at the institution. Average rating of the overall quality of their program on a five point scale in an annual survey final year students.!
Students overall evaluation on the quality of their learning experiences at the institution. Average rating of the overall quality of their program on a five point scale in an annual survey final year students.!
Students overall evaluation on the quality of their learning experiences at the institution. Average rating of the overall quality of their program on a five point scale in an annual survey final year students.!
Standard/Broad Area Key Performance Indicator Level at Which Data is
Required Management of Quality Assurance and Improvement 1. Students overall evaluation on the quality of their learning experiences at the institution. Average rating of the overall quality of their program on a five point scale in an annual survey final year students.! Program "ollege Institution #. Proportion of courses in $hich student evaluations $ere conducted during the year. Program "ollege Institution %. Proportion of programs in $hich there $as independent verification $ithin the institution of standards of student achievement during the year. Program "ollege Institution &. Proportion of programs in $hich there $as independent verification of standards of student achievement 'y people external to the institution during the year. Program "ollege Institution (earning and )eaching *. +atio of students to teaching staff. ,ased on full time equivalents! Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. .. Students overall rating on the quality of their courses. Average rating of students on a five point scale on overall evaluation of courses.! Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. /. Proportion of teaching staff $ith verified doctoral qualifications. Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. 0. Percentage of students entering programs $ho successfully complete first year. Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. 1. Proportion of students entering undergraduate programs $ho complete those programs in minimum time. Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. 12. Proportion of students entering post graduate programs $ho complete those programs in specified time. Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. 11. Proportion of graduates from undergraduate programs $ho $ithin six months of graduation are3 a! employed '! enrolled in further study c! not see4ing employment or further study Program "ollege Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. Student Administration and Support Services 1#. +atio of students to administrative staff Institution 1%. Proportion of total operating funds other than accommodation and student allo$ances! allocated to provision of student services. Institution 1&. Student evaluation of academic and career counselling. Average rating on the adequacy of academic and career counselling on a five point scale in an annual survey of final year students. Institution (earning +esources 1*. 5um'er of 'oo4 titles held in the li'rary as a proportion of the num'er of students. 1.. 5um'er of $e' site su'scriptions as a proportion of the num'er of programs offered. Institution 1/. 5um'er of periodical su'scriptions as a proportion of the num'er of programs offered. Institution 10. Student evaluation of li'rary services. Average rating on adequacy of li'rary services on a five point scale in an annual survey of final year students.! Institution 6acilities and 7quipment 11. Annual expenditure on I) as a proportion of the num'er of students. Institution #2. 5um'er of accessi'le computer terminals per student. Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. #1. Average overall rating of adequacy of facilities and equipment in a survey of teaching staff. Institution -ata separately for male and female sections and com'ined for all. ##. Internet 'and$idth per user Institution 6inancial Planning and Management #%. )otal operating expenditure other than accommodation and student allo$ances! per student. Institution 6aculty and Staff 7mployment Processes #&. Proportion of teaching staff leaving the institution in the past year for reasons other than age retirement. "ollege Institution #*. Proportion of teaching staff participating in professional development activities during the past year. "ollege Institution +esearch #.. 5um'er of refereed pu'lications in the previous year per full time equivalent mem'er of teaching staff. Pu'lications 'ased on the formula in the 8igher "ouncil ,yla$ excluding conference presentations! "ollege Institution #/. 5um'er of citations in refereed 9ournals in the previous year per full time equivalent teaching staff. "ollege Institution #0. Proportion of full time mem'er of teaching staff $ith at least one refereed pu'lication during the previous year. "ollege Institution #1. 5um'er of papers or reports presented at academic conferences during the past year per full time equivalent mem'ers of teaching staff . "ollege Institution %2. +esearch income from external sources in the past year as a proportion of the num'er of full time teaching staff mem'ers. "ollege Institution %1. Proportion of total operating funds spent on research. Institution "ommunity Service %#. Proportion of full time teaching and other staff actively engaged in community service activities. "ollege Institution %%. 5um'er of community education programs provided as a proportion of the num'er of departments. "ollege Institution