Sunteți pe pagina 1din 192

City of Irvine Voter Survey

October 2014

Q1. What is the most important issue facing your community today?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

OVERPOPULATION/CONTROLLING 113 44 69 48 38 23 40 29 44 97 16 0 10 36 33 34 19 25 27 42
GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT 37.7 30.3 44.5 39.3 39.6 32.4 38.5 37.2 37.3 43.1 21.6 19.6 34.3 49.3 44.2 22.4 41.7 38.0 50.0

TRANSPORTATION 58 21 37 24 20 14 21 17 20 41 16 1 2 27 19 10 11 10 18 19
19.3 14.5 23.9 19.7 20.8 19.7 20.2 21.8 16.9 18.2 21.6 100.0 3.9 25.7 28.4 13.0 12.9 16.7 25.4 22.6

GOVERNMENT 46 28 18 26 12 4 19 10 17 38 8 0 6 11 9 20 12 16 5 13
15.3 19.3 11.6 21.3 12.5 5.6 18.3 12.8 14.4 16.9 10.8 11.8 10.5 13.4 26.0 14.1 26.7 7.0 15.5

EDUCATION/SCHOOLS/HIGHER 31 13 18 10 11 9 8 7 16 23 8 0 5 16 5 5 11 2 10 8
EDUCATION 10.3 9.0 11.6 8.2 11.5 12.7 7.7 9.0 13.6 10.2 10.8 9.8 15.2 7.5 6.5 12.9 3.3 14.1 9.5

JOBS AND THE ECONOMY 29 19 10 17 5 7 13 5 11 18 11 0 6 11 7 5 11 8 6 4
9.7 13.1 6.5 13.9 5.2 9.9 12.5 6.4 9.3 8.0 14.9 11.8 10.5 10.4 6.5 12.9 13.3 8.5 4.8

PUBLIC SAFETY 29 13 16 12 5 11 11 5 13 15 14 0 6 13 6 4 10 3 9 7
9.7 9.0 10.3 9.8 5.2 15.5 10.6 6.4 11.0 6.7 18.9 11.8 12.4 9.0 5.2 11.8 5.0 12.7 8.3

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 22 7 15 8 8 5 7 5 10 15 7 0 4 8 3 7 3 4 9 6
7.3 4.8 9.7 6.6 8.3 7.0 6.7 6.4 8.5 6.7 9.5 7.8 7.6 4.5 9.1 3.5 6.7 12.7 7.1

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11 8 3 3 5 3 2 5 4 7 4 0 1 8 2 0 6 2 3 0
3.7 5.5 1.9 2.5 5.2 4.2 1.9 6.4 3.4 3.1 5.4 2.0 7.6 3.0 7.1 3.3 4.2

MORAL ISSUES 5 2 3 3 2 0 3 2 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 2
1.7 1.4 1.9 2.5 2.1 2.9 2.6 1.8 1.4 3.9 3.9 1.2 1.7 1.4 2.4

HEALTHCARE 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 0
1.0 0.7 1.3 1.0 2.8 1.3 1.7 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.2 2.8

POVERTY 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 1.4 1.7 0.4 1.4 3.9 1.2 1.4

NONE/NOTHING 11 9 2 3 4 4 3 3 5 9 2 0 5 4 1 1 8 1 1 1
3.7 6.2 1.3 2.5 4.2 5.6 2.9 3.8 4.2 4.0 2.7 9.8 3.8 1.5 1.3 9.4 1.7 1.4 1.2

OTHER 13 8 5 4 4 3 4 2 7 11 2 0 5 2 3 3 6 2 1 4
4.3 5.5 3.2 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.8 2.6 5.9 4.9 2.7 9.8 1.9 4.5 3.9 7.1 3.3 1.4 4.8

DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 16 7 9 4 6 6 4 5 7 9 7 0 4 4 3 5 4 3 4 5
5.3 4.8 5.8 3.3 6.3 8.5 3.8 6.4 5.9 4.0 9.5 7.8 3.8 4.5 6.5 4.7 5.0 5.6 6.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q1. What is the most important issue facing your community today?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

OVERPOPULATION/CONTROLLING 113 19 29 14 9 10 28 16 32 13 10 14 24 35 20 18 21 16 1 2 0
GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT 37.7 32.8 45.3 30.4 36.0 28.6 45.9 33.3 43.2 27.7 41.7 27.5 53.3 40.7 50.0 41.9 28.4 36.4 33.3 20.0

TRANSPORTATION 58 6 18 7 7 8 12 9 15 9 5 11 9 17 7 8 14 8 0 4 0
19.3 10.3 28.1 15.2 28.0 22.9 19.7 18.8 20.3 19.1 20.8 21.6 20.0 19.8 17.5 18.6 18.9 18.2 40.0

GOVERNMENT 46 17 9 3 1 6 6 6 20 2 2 5 7 21 4 8 8 5 0 0 0
15.3 29.3 14.1 6.5 4.0 17.1 9.8 12.5 27.0 4.3 8.3 9.8 15.6 24.4 10.0 18.6 10.8 11.4

EDUCATION/SCHOOLS/HIGHER 31 4 6 4 5 5 6 7 3 7 2 7 4 9 6 5 7 2 1 1 0
EDUCATION 10.3 6.9 9.4 8.7 20.0 14.3 9.8 14.6 4.1 14.9 8.3 13.7 8.9 10.5 15.0 11.6 9.5 4.5 33.3 10.0

JOBS AND THE ECONOMY 29 11 6 5 2 3 2 11 6 4 3 2 3 7 7 3 7 3 0 2 0
9.7 19.0 9.4 10.9 8.0 8.6 3.3 22.9 8.1 8.5 12.5 3.9 6.7 8.1 17.5 7.0 9.5 6.8 20.0

PUBLIC SAFETY 29 4 8 7 4 1 4 10 2 6 5 2 3 4 7 5 8 4 1 0 0
9.7 6.9 12.5 15.2 16.0 2.9 6.6 20.8 2.7 12.8 20.8 3.9 6.7 4.7 17.5 11.6 10.8 9.1 33.3

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 22 3 5 2 3 1 7 3 5 3 2 5 3 6 2 1 6 5 0 2 0
7.3 5.2 7.8 4.3 12.0 2.9 11.5 6.3 6.8 6.4 8.3 9.8 6.7 7.0 5.0 2.3 8.1 11.4 20.0

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11 3 0 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 5 0 2 0 4 4 1 0 0 0
3.7 5.2 4.3 4.0 8.6 3.3 4.2 1.4 4.3 4.2 9.8 2.3 9.3 5.4 2.3

MORAL ISSUES 5 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
1.7 1.7 3.1 2.9 1.6 4.1 3.9 2.3 2.7 2.3

HEALTHCARE 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1.0 2.2 4.0 1.6 4.3 2.0 1.2 1.4 2.3

POVERTY 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
0.7 2.2 2.1 4.5

NONE/NOTHING 11 3 0 4 0 2 2 2 1 4 0 3 1 3 0 0 5 3 0 0 0
3.7 5.2 8.7 5.7 3.3 4.2 1.4 8.5 5.9 2.2 3.5 6.8 6.8

OTHER 13 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 0 6 2 1 1 0
4.3 3.4 3.1 4.3 4.0 5.7 3.3 2.1 4.1 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.4 2.3 2.5 8.1 4.5 33.3 10.0

DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 16 1 3 5 1 1 5 0 4 5 1 3 3 5 0 3 6 2 0 0 0
5.3 1.7 4.7 10.9 4.0 2.9 8.2 5.4 10.6 4.2 5.9 6.7 5.8 7.0 8.1 4.5

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q1. What is the most important issue facing your community today?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

OVERPOPULATION/CONTROLLING 113 74 13 26 5 34 16 39 19 9 9 15 6 16 19 1 9 29
GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT 37.7 38.9 43.3 32.5 26.3 35.4 25.4 45.9 51.4 37.5 33.3 30.0 22.2 43.2 54.3 6.3 39.1 47.5

TRANSPORTATION 58 39 8 11 3 22 12 11 10 4 4 10 3 6 9 1 9 12
19.3 20.5 26.7 13.8 15.8 22.9 19.0 12.9 27.0 16.7 14.8 20.0 11.1 16.2 25.7 6.3 39.1 19.7

GOVERNMENT 46 32 2 12 0 13 11 11 11 1 5 7 8 9 0 1 2 13
15.3 16.8 6.7 15.0 13.5 17.5 12.9 29.7 4.2 18.5 14.0 29.6 24.3 6.3 8.7 21.3

EDUCATION/SCHOOLS/HIGHER 31 19 2 10 5 10 7 7 2 2 5 9 1 5 2 1 2 4
EDUCATION 10.3 10.0 6.7 12.5 26.3 10.4 11.1 8.2 5.4 8.3 18.5 18.0 3.7 13.5 5.7 6.3 8.7 6.6

JOBS AND THE ECONOMY 29 16 4 9 1 11 5 9 3 2 2 5 4 3 5 2 1 5
9.7 8.4 13.3 11.3 5.3 11.5 7.9 10.6 8.1 8.3 7.4 10.0 14.8 8.1 14.3 12.5 4.3 8.2

PUBLIC SAFETY 29 15 6 8 4 8 8 8 1 2 3 2 4 4 6 3 1 4
9.7 7.9 20.0 10.0 21.1 8.3 12.7 9.4 2.7 8.3 11.1 4.0 14.8 10.8 17.1 18.8 4.3 6.6

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 22 15 2 5 3 5 5 8 1 2 3 3 1 4 3 3 1 2
7.3 7.9 6.7 6.3 15.8 5.2 7.9 9.4 2.7 8.3 11.1 6.0 3.7 10.8 8.6 18.8 4.3 3.3

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11 5 0 6 1 3 2 4 1 1 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 2
3.7 2.6 7.5 5.3 3.1 3.2 4.7 2.7 4.2 2.0 11.1 2.7 2.9 6.3 4.3 3.3

MORAL ISSUES 5 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0
1.7 2.6 3.1 5.4 4.0 2.7 12.5

HEALTHCARE 3 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0
1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.6 2.7 2.9 6.3 4.3

POVERTY 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 1.1 2.1 4.2 2.9

NONE/NOTHING 11 9 1 1 2 3 4 2 0 1 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 2
3.7 4.7 3.3 1.3 10.5 3.1 6.3 2.4 4.2 7.4 6.0 3.7 2.7 6.3 3.3

OTHER 13 8 1 4 2 3 3 4 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 4
4.3 4.2 3.3 5.0 10.5 3.1 4.8 4.7 2.7 8.3 2.0 3.7 5.4 6.3 8.7 6.6

DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 16 9 2 5 1 4 7 4 0 2 1 5 1 0 1 2 1 3
5.3 4.7 6.7 6.3 5.3 4.2 11.1 4.7 8.3 3.7 10.0 3.7 2.9 12.5 4.3 4.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q1. What is the most important issue facing your community today?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

OVERPOPULATION/CONTROLLING 113 24 11 55 23 20 30 27 42 47 29 4 83 2 13 7 4 0 113 0 63 50
GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT 37.7 22.6 30.6 65.5 31.1 38.5 42.3 38.0 47.7 49.0 27.1 23.5 41.7 40.0 36.1 20.6 44.4 37.8 36.2 39.7

TRANSPORTATION 58 17 7 25 9 13 10 14 18 21 19 1 41 2 8 3 3 0 58 0 32 26
19.3 16.0 19.4 29.8 12.2 25.0 14.1 19.7 20.5 21.9 17.8 5.9 20.6 40.0 22.2 8.8 33.3 19.4 18.4 20.6

GOVERNMENT 46 22 6 11 7 9 11 14 12 14 15 2 31 1 4 6 2 0 46 0 17 29
15.3 20.8 16.7 13.1 9.5 17.3 15.5 19.7 13.6 14.6 14.0 11.8 15.6 20.0 11.1 17.6 22.2 15.4 9.8 23.0

EDUCATION/SCHOOLS/HIGHER 31 15 4 5 7 5 7 6 12 12 10 2 18 0 7 2 2 0 31 0 20 11
EDUCATION 10.3 14.2 11.1 6.0 9.5 9.6 9.9 8.5 13.6 12.5 9.3 11.8 9.0 19.4 5.9 22.2 10.4 11.5 8.7

JOBS AND THE ECONOMY 29 17 1 4 7 9 8 11 7 5 9 1 23 0 2 2 1 0 29 0 19 10
9.7 16.0 2.8 4.8 9.5 17.3 11.3 15.5 8.0 5.2 8.4 5.9 11.6 5.6 5.9 11.1 9.7 10.9 7.9

PUBLIC SAFETY 29 14 5 3 7 6 7 9 9 9 8 5 15 0 2 6 1 0 29 0 20 9
9.7 13.2 13.9 3.6 9.5 11.5 9.9 12.7 10.2 9.4 7.5 29.4 7.5 5.6 17.6 11.1 9.7 11.5 7.1

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 22 6 4 3 9 2 3 3 5 7 12 2 13 0 3 4 0 1 21 0 14 8
7.3 5.7 11.1 3.6 12.2 3.8 4.2 4.2 5.7 7.3 11.2 11.8 6.5 8.3 11.8 100.0 7.0 8.0 6.3

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11 4 0 5 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 0 7 0 1 3 0 0 11 0 7 4
3.7 3.8 6.0 2.7 7.7 2.8 2.8 2.3 4.2 3.7 3.5 2.8 8.8 3.7 4.0 3.2

MORAL ISSUES 5 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 1 1 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 2 3
1.7 1.2 5.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 2.8 1.5 2.8 2.9 1.7 1.1 2.4

HEALTHCARE 3 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 2.8 2.7 1.9 1.1 0.9 5.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8

POVERTY 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 0
0.7 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.9 2.8 2.9 0.7 1.1

NONE/NOTHING 11 7 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 0 8 1 1 1 0 0 11 0 8 3
3.7 6.6 2.8 1.2 2.7 3.8 4.2 4.2 3.4 4.2 2.8 4.0 20.0 2.8 2.9 3.7 4.6 2.4

OTHER 13 5 1 0 7 1 5 1 1 2 8 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 13 0 8 5
4.3 4.7 2.8 9.5 1.9 7.0 1.4 1.1 2.1 7.5 5.5 2.8 2.9 4.3 4.6 4.0

DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 16 4 2 4 6 2 2 2 4 6 8 1 7 0 4 3 1 0 16 0 9 7
5.3 3.8 5.6 4.8 8.1 3.8 2.8 2.8 4.5 6.3 7.5 5.9 3.5 11.1 8.8 11.1 5.4 5.2 5.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 58 31 27 35 14 8 30 10 18 43 15 0 5 19 15 19 13 18 11 16
19.3 21.4 17.4 28.7 14.6 11.3 28.8 12.8 15.3 19.1 20.3 9.8 18.1 22.4 24.7 15.3 30.0 15.5 19.0

LOCAL TELEVISION 56 18 38 24 20 12 20 16 20 42 14 0 3 19 13 21 8 10 14 24
18.7 12.4 24.5 19.7 20.8 16.9 19.2 20.5 16.9 18.7 18.9 5.9 18.1 19.4 27.3 9.4 16.7 19.7 28.6

FOX 13 6 7 10 1 2 10 0 3 9 4 0 0 5 2 6 3 3 2 5
4.3 4.1 4.5 8.2 1.0 2.8 9.6 2.5 4.0 5.4 4.8 3.0 7.8 3.5 5.0 2.8 6.0

ABC - CHANNEL 7 11 2 9 6 4 1 5 3 3 10 1 0 0 3 5 3 1 1 2 7
3.7 1.4 5.8 4.9 4.2 1.4 4.8 3.8 2.5 4.4 1.4 2.9 7.5 3.9 1.2 1.7 2.8 8.3

CHANNEL 5 9 2 7 4 4 1 3 4 2 6 3 0 1 5 2 1 1 1 5 2
3.0 1.4 4.5 3.3 4.2 1.4 2.9 5.1 1.7 2.7 4.1 2.0 4.8 3.0 1.3 1.2 1.7 7.0 2.4

CNN 6 1 5 1 5 0 1 4 1 4 2 0 1 1 1 3 0 1 2 3
2.0 0.7 3.2 0.8 5.2 1.0 5.1 0.8 1.8 2.7 2.0 1.0 1.5 3.9 1.7 2.8 3.6

NEWS CHANNELS 5 0 5 1 1 3 1 0 4 4 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 4
(UNSPECIFIED) 1.7 3.2 0.8 1.0 4.2 1.0 3.4 1.8 1.4 1.0 3.0 2.6 1.4 4.8

NBC - CHANNEL 4 4 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 2
1.3 1.4 1.3 3.1 1.4 2.6 1.7 1.3 1.4 4.5 1.3 3.3 2.4

CBS - CHANNEL 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 3
1.3 0.7 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.3 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.5 2.6 1.2 3.6

PBS/PUBLIC BROADCASTING 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
SERVICE 1.0 0.7 1.3 1.0 2.8 1.3 1.7 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.2

CHANNEL 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.4 1.4 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.4

LOCAL STATION 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.4 1.4 1.9 1.2 1.4

OTHER 7 2 5 3 3 1 2 3 2 7 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 0 5
2.3 1.4 3.2 2.5 3.1 1.4 1.9 3.8 1.7 3.1 1.0 7.8 1.2 1.7 6.0

DON'T KNOW 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.4 1.0 1.2

A WEBSITE OR BLOG 50 30 20 17 12 17 16 10 24 38 12 0 14 20 10 6 21 9 13 7
16.7 20.7 12.9 13.9 12.5 23.9 15.4 12.8 20.3 16.9 16.2 27.5 19.0 14.9 7.8 24.7 15.0 18.3 8.3

YAHOO 10 4 6 5 2 2 4 1 5 8 2 0 3 2 3 2 3 1 2 4
3.3 2.8 3.9 4.1 2.1 2.8 3.8 1.3 4.2 3.6 2.7 5.9 1.9 4.5 2.6 3.5 1.7 2.8 4.8

CNN 9 5 4 2 4 1 2 3 4 7 2 0 2 6 1 0 4 1 4 0
3.0 3.4 2.6 1.6 4.2 1.4 1.9 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.9 5.7 1.5 4.7 1.7 5.6

GOOGLE 7 5 2 2 1 2 2 1 4 5 2 0 4 1 0 2 4 1 1 1
2.3 3.4 1.3 1.6 1.0 2.8 1.9 1.3 3.4 2.2 2.7 7.8 1.0 2.6 4.7 1.7 1.4 1.2

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

REDDIT 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
1.3 2.8 5.6 3.4 1.8 7.8 4.7

NEWS WEBSITES 4 2 2 3 0 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
1.3 1.4 1.3 2.5 1.4 2.9 0.8 0.9 2.7 1.9 3.0 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.2

NBC 3 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0
1.0 2.1 1.0 2.8 1.3 1.7 0.9 1.4 3.9 1.0 3.5

FOX 3 2 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1
1.0 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.4 1.9 0.8 1.3 2.0 1.0 1.3 2.4 1.2

JUST ANY 3 3 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0
1.0 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.9 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.0 3.0 1.2 3.3

NONE 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
0.7 1.4 2.8 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.2 1.7

OTHER 12 6 6 4 5 2 4 5 3 10 2 0 2 7 1 2 4 2 5 1
4.0 4.1 3.9 3.3 5.2 2.8 3.8 6.4 2.5 4.4 2.7 3.9 6.7 1.5 2.6 4.7 3.3 7.0 1.2

DON'T KNOW 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 2.0 1.2

SOMETHING ELSE: 37 19 18 9 14 13 8 11 18 26 11 0 5 11 9 12 9 10 7 11
12.3 13.1 11.6 7.4 14.6 18.3 7.7 14.1 15.3 11.6 14.9 9.8 10.5 13.4 15.6 10.6 16.7 9.9 13.1

NEWSPAPERS (I.E. DAILY 14 5 9 4 3 6 4 3 7 10 4 0 1 4 3 6 2 3 3 6
PILOT, ORANGE COUNTY 4.7 3.4 5.8 3.3 3.1 8.5 3.8 3.8 5.9 4.4 5.4 2.0 3.8 4.5 7.8 2.4 5.0 4.2 7.1
REGISTER, ETC.

FROM NEIGHBORS/FRIENDS/ 9 4 5 2 4 3 1 3 5 7 2 0 0 2 3 4 0 4 2 3
FAMILY 3.0 2.8 3.2 1.6 4.2 4.2 1.0 3.8 4.2 3.1 2.7 1.9 4.5 5.2 6.7 2.8 3.6

TELEPHONE SURVEYS 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.9 3.9 1.2 1.4

FLYERS/HANDOUTS 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.4 1.4 2.0 1.0 1.2 1.4

NONE 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 1.5 1.7

OTHER 10 8 2 2 6 2 2 4 4 6 4 0 2 4 2 2 6 2 0 2
3.3 5.5 1.3 1.6 6.3 2.8 1.9 5.1 3.4 2.7 5.4 3.9 3.8 3.0 2.6 7.1 3.3 2.4

LOS ANGELES TIMES 27 11 16 10 13 4 6 11 10 22 4 1 2 9 6 10 6 5 5 11
9.0 7.6 10.3 8.2 13.5 5.6 5.8 14.1 8.5 9.8 5.4 100.0 3.9 8.6 9.0 13.0 7.1 8.3 7.0 13.1

LOCAL RADIO 22 11 11 9 8 4 8 6 8 17 5 0 4 7 7 4 6 5 5 6
7.3 7.6 7.1 7.4 8.3 5.6 7.7 7.7 6.8 7.6 6.8 7.8 6.7 10.4 5.2 7.1 8.3 7.0 7.1

NPR 5 1 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 4 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 3 1
1.7 0.7 2.6 0.8 2.1 2.8 1.0 1.3 2.5 1.8 1.4 2.0 2.9 1.3 1.2 4.2 1.2

KFI 640 AM 3 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0
1.0 2.1 1.6 1.0 1.7 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.4 1.7

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

KPCC 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
0.7 1.4 2.1 2.6 0.9 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.7

UNSPECIFIED NEWS STATIONS 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.9 2.6 1.7 1.2

PUBLIC RADIO STATION 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
(UNSPECIFIED) 0.7 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.9 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.7

JUST ANY STATION/CAN'T 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
SPECIFY 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.9 0.4 1.4 3.0 2.4

OTHER 6 2 4 3 2 1 3 1 2 4 2 0 0 3 2 1 1 1 2 2
2.0 1.4 2.6 2.5 2.1 1.4 2.9 1.3 1.7 1.8 2.7 2.9 3.0 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.8 2.4

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUCH 20 11 9 7 7 4 6 6 8 14 6 0 10 10 0 0 11 0 9 0
AS FACEBOOK AND TWITTER 6.7 7.6 5.8 5.7 7.3 5.6 5.8 7.7 6.8 6.2 8.1 19.6 9.5 12.9 12.7

FACEBOOK 15 9 6 5 6 4 4 5 6 10 5 0 8 7 0 0 9 0 6 0
5.0 6.2 3.9 4.1 6.3 5.6 3.8 6.4 5.1 4.4 6.8 15.7 6.7 10.6 8.5

OTHER 5 2 3 2 1 0 2 1 2 4 1 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 3 0
1.7 1.4 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.4 3.9 2.9 2.4 4.2

MAGAZINES 10 5 5 4 2 4 4 2 4 8 2 0 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3
3.3 3.4 3.2 3.3 2.1 5.6 3.8 2.6 3.4 3.6 2.7 3.9 2.9 4.5 2.6 3.5 3.3 2.8 3.6

IRVINE COMMUNITY NEWS AND 3 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2
VIEWS 1.0 0.7 1.3 0.8 2.8 1.0 1.7 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 2.4

THE REGISTER 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.4

OTHER 5 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 4 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
1.7 2.1 1.3 1.6 1.0 2.8 1.9 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.4 3.9 1.0 1.5 1.3 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.2

NOTHING 9 3 6 5 2 0 4 2 3 7 2 0 1 3 2 3 2 1 2 4
3.0 2.1 3.9 4.1 2.1 3.8 2.6 2.5 3.1 2.7 2.0 2.9 3.0 3.9 2.4 1.7 2.8 4.8

UNSURE 10 5 5 2 4 4 2 4 4 8 2 0 5 3 2 0 5 0 3 2
3.3 3.4 3.2 1.6 4.2 5.6 1.9 5.1 3.4 3.6 2.7 9.8 2.9 3.0 5.9 4.2 2.4

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 1.4 1.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 58 16 19 7 1 7 7 10 25 4 4 9 5 30 7 4 8 9 0 0 0
19.3 27.6 29.7 15.2 4.0 20.0 11.5 20.8 33.8 8.5 16.7 17.6 11.1 34.9 17.5 9.3 10.8 20.5

LOCAL TELEVISION 56 10 14 4 8 4 16 11 13 5 7 6 14 16 8 9 14 5 0 4 0
18.7 17.2 21.9 8.7 32.0 11.4 26.2 22.9 17.6 10.6 29.2 11.8 31.1 18.6 20.0 20.9 18.9 11.4 40.0

FOX 13 5 5 1 1 0 1 3 7 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 5 1 0 1 0
4.3 8.6 7.8 2.2 4.0 1.6 6.3 9.5 2.1 4.2 2.0 2.3 5.0 4.7 6.8 2.3 10.0

ABC - CHANNEL 7 11 1 5 0 1 1 3 2 4 0 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 3 0 0 0
3.7 1.7 7.8 4.0 2.9 4.9 4.2 5.4 4.2 2.0 6.7 2.3 2.5 7.0 2.7 6.8

CHANNEL 5 9 1 3 1 0 0 4 3 1 0 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 0
3.0 1.7 4.7 2.2 6.6 6.3 1.4 4.2 5.9 2.2 1.2 5.0 2.3 2.7 2.3 20.0

CNN 6 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
2.0 1.6 2.9 6.6 1.4 3.9 6.7 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.4 2.3

NEWS CHANNELS 5 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0
(UNSPECIFIED) 1.7 1.6 12.0 1.6 1.4 2.1 8.3 2.2 1.2 2.3 4.1

NBC - CHANNEL 4 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
1.3 4.0 5.7 1.6 4.2 6.7 1.2 2.3 1.4 2.3

CBS - CHANNEL 2 4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1.3 1.7 1.6 4.0 1.6 2.1 1.4 4.2 2.2 2.3 1.4 2.3

PBS/PUBLIC BROADCASTING 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
SERVICE 1.0 2.2 4.0 1.6 2.1 4.2 2.2 1.2 2.5 10.0

CHANNEL 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 4.0 2.9 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.3

LOCAL STATION 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.3

OTHER 7 2 1 0 1 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3 3.4 1.6 4.0 4.9 2.1 2.7 4.2 6.7 8.1

DON'T KNOW 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.7 2.1 2.3

A WEBSITE OR BLOG 50 9 8 16 1 3 9 6 11 13 4 11 1 7 9 9 15 7 1 2 0
16.7 15.5 12.5 34.8 4.0 8.6 14.8 12.5 14.9 27.7 16.7 21.6 2.2 8.1 22.5 20.9 20.3 15.9 33.3 20.0

YAHOO 10 2 3 1 1 0 2 1 4 1 1 2 0 1 3 0 3 2 0 1 0
3.3 3.4 4.7 2.2 4.0 3.3 2.1 5.4 2.1 4.2 3.9 1.2 7.5 4.1 4.5 10.0

CNN 9 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 4 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 1 0
3.0 3.4 2.2 2.9 4.9 2.1 1.4 2.1 7.8 3.5 2.5 2.3 4.1 10.0

GOOGLE 7 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 0
2.3 1.7 1.6 4.3 1.6 2.7 4.3 2.0 7.0 1.4 2.3 33.3 10.0

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

REDDIT 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0
1.3 8.7 8.5 1.4 6.8

NEWS WEBSITES 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
1.3 1.7 3.1 2.2 4.2 1.4 4.2 1.2 2.5 4.7

NBC 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
1.0 4.3 2.9 4.3 2.0 1.2 2.5 1.4

FOX 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
1.0 1.7 1.6 2.2 2.1 1.4 2.1 5.0 2.3

JUST ANY 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
1.0 3.4 2.2 2.1 1.4 4.2 5.0 1.4

NONE 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
0.7 4.3 2.1 4.2 2.3 1.4

OTHER 12 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 2 2 0 4 1 1 2 1 4 3 0 1 0
4.0 3.4 3.1 4.3 5.7 4.9 4.2 2.7 4.3 7.8 2.2 1.2 5.0 2.3 5.4 6.8 10.0

DON'T KNOW 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

SOMETHING ELSE: 37 5 4 7 6 7 7 3 6 8 5 5 9 11 5 5 11 4 0 1 0
12.3 8.6 6.3 15.2 24.0 20.0 11.5 6.3 8.1 17.0 20.8 9.8 20.0 12.8 12.5 11.6 14.9 9.1 10.0

NEWSPAPERS (I.E. DAILY 14 1 3 3 3 1 2 0 4 3 3 2 1 4 4 2 4 0 0 0 0
PILOT, ORANGE COUNTY 4.7 1.7 4.7 6.5 12.0 2.9 3.3 5.4 6.4 12.5 3.9 2.2 4.7 10.0 4.7 5.4
REGISTER, ETC.

FROM NEIGHBORS/FRIENDS/ 9 2 0 1 2 1 3 0 2 2 1 0 4 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0
FAMILY 3.0 3.4 2.2 8.0 2.9 4.9 2.7 4.3 4.2 8.9 4.7 2.3 5.4

TELEPHONE SURVEYS 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
0.7 4.0 2.9 2.1 2.0 1.4 10.0

FLYERS/HANDOUTS 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 1.6 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.3

NONE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 4.2 2.3

OTHER 10 2 0 2 0 4 2 2 0 2 0 2 4 3 1 1 2 3 0 0 0
3.3 3.4 4.3 11.4 3.3 4.2 4.3 3.9 8.9 3.5 2.5 2.3 2.7 6.8

LOS ANGELES TIMES 27 4 6 1 3 6 7 5 5 3 1 3 10 11 5 4 4 1 1 1 0
9.0 6.9 9.4 2.2 12.0 17.1 11.5 10.4 6.8 6.4 4.2 5.9 22.2 12.8 12.5 9.3 5.4 2.3 33.3 10.0

LOCAL RADIO 22 4 5 1 3 5 3 3 6 4 0 3 5 5 4 2 7 4 0 0 0
7.3 6.9 7.8 2.2 12.0 14.3 4.9 6.3 8.1 8.5 5.9 11.1 5.8 10.0 4.7 9.5 9.1

NPR 5 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
1.7 1.6 8.0 2.9 1.6 1.4 4.3 3.9 1.2 2.5 2.3 2.7

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

KFI 640 AM 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
1.0 3.4 2.1 1.4 1.4 4.5

KPCC 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 5.7 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.3

UNSPECIFIED NEWS STATIONS 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 2.2 1.2 2.5

PUBLIC RADIO STATION 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
(UNSPECIFIED) 0.7 2.2 2.9 2.1 2.2 2.7

JUST ANY STATION/CAN'T 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
SPECIFY 0.7 3.1 2.7 2.5 1.4

OTHER 6 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
2.0 1.7 3.1 4.0 2.9 1.6 4.2 1.4 2.1 4.4 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.4 2.3

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUCH 20 4 3 4 0 2 5 7 0 4 0 7 0 1 0 6 5 6 1 1 0
AS FACEBOOK AND TWITTER 6.7 6.9 4.7 8.7 5.7 8.2 14.6 8.5 13.7 1.2 14.0 6.8 13.6 33.3 10.0

FACEBOOK 15 3 2 4 0 2 4 5 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 4 4 5 0 1 0
5.0 5.2 3.1 8.7 5.7 6.6 10.4 8.5 11.8 1.2 9.3 5.4 11.4 10.0

OTHER 5 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0
1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 4.2 2.0 4.7 1.4 2.3 33.3

MAGAZINES 10 3 1 2 2 0 2 1 3 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 3 3 0 0 0
3.3 5.2 1.6 4.3 8.0 3.3 2.1 4.1 4.3 8.3 3.9 1.2 2.5 4.7 4.1 6.8

IRVINE COMMUNITY NEWS AND 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
VIEWS 1.0 1.7 8.0 2.1 8.3 1.2 1.4 2.3

THE REGISTER 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.3

OTHER 5 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0
1.7 1.7 1.6 4.3 1.6 2.7 4.3 2.0 2.3 2.7 4.5

NOTHING 9 2 3 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 0 1 0
3.0 3.4 4.7 3.3 2.1 5.4 2.0 2.2 3.5 2.5 4.7 1.4 2.3 10.0

UNSURE 10 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 4 0 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 0
3.3 1.7 1.6 6.5 4.0 2.9 4.9 2.1 1.4 6.4 4.2 7.8 1.2 6.8 9.1

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 58 44 4 10 1 19 11 16 11 4 8 8 2 9 8 2 4 13
19.3 23.2 13.3 12.5 5.3 19.8 17.5 18.8 29.7 16.7 29.6 16.0 7.4 24.3 22.9 12.5 17.4 21.3

LOCAL TELEVISION 56 38 2 16 3 15 11 19 8 3 2 14 7 9 4 2 3 12
18.7 20.0 6.7 20.0 15.8 15.6 17.5 22.4 21.6 12.5 7.4 28.0 25.9 24.3 11.4 12.5 13.0 19.7

FOX 13 6 1 6 1 6 3 1 2 1 0 4 1 2 1 0 1 3
4.3 3.2 3.3 7.5 5.3 6.3 4.8 1.2 5.4 4.2 8.0 3.7 5.4 2.9 4.3 4.9

ABC - CHANNEL 7 11 8 0 3 0 1 2 7 1 1 0 5 1 0 2 0 1 1
3.7 4.2 3.8 1.0 3.2 8.2 2.7 4.2 10.0 3.7 5.7 4.3 1.6

CHANNEL 5 9 4 1 4 0 3 2 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 2
3.0 2.1 3.3 5.0 3.1 3.2 4.7 4.0 7.4 5.7 4.3 3.3

CNN 6 5 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0
2.0 2.6 1.3 3.1 3.2 2.7 4.2 3.7 4.0 6.3 4.3

NEWS CHANNELS 5 3 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
(UNSPECIFIED) 1.7 1.6 2.5 1.0 2.4 5.4 3.7 2.0 2.7 3.3

NBC - CHANNEL 4 4 3 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1
1.3 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.6 2.4 4.0 3.7 1.6

CBS - CHANNEL 2 4 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
1.3 2.1 1.0 1.6 1.2 2.7 2.0 3.7 3.3

PBS/PUBLIC BROADCASTING 3 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
SERVICE 1.0 1.6 5.3 1.6 1.2 3.7 2.7 1.6

CHANNEL 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
0.7 1.1 5.3 1.0 2.7 6.3

LOCAL STATION 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 1.3 2.4 5.4

OTHER 7 7 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 1
2.3 3.7 3.2 4.7 2.7 4.2 4.0 7.4 2.7 1.6

DON'T KNOW 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 0.5 1.0 2.7

A WEBSITE OR BLOG 50 31 7 12 7 14 15 13 1 6 0 5 5 6 11 3 5 9
16.7 16.3 23.3 15.0 36.8 14.6 23.8 15.3 2.7 25.0 10.0 18.5 16.2 31.4 18.8 21.7 14.8

YAHOO 10 5 1 4 2 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 4
3.3 2.6 3.3 5.0 10.5 1.0 7.9 1.2 2.7 4.2 3.7 2.7 5.7 4.3 6.6

CNN 9 4 3 2 1 3 2 3 0 2 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 1
3.0 2.1 10.0 2.5 5.3 3.1 3.2 3.5 8.3 2.0 3.7 5.4 5.7 1.6

GOOGLE 7 5 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 1
2.3 2.6 3.3 1.3 15.8 1.0 3.2 1.2 2.0 8.6 8.7 1.6

REDDIT 4 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0
1.3 1.6 1.3 10.5 1.0 1.6 6.3 13.0

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

NEWS WEBSITES 4 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
1.3 1.1 6.7 5.3 1.0 1.6 1.2 4.2 2.0 3.7 2.9

NBC 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
1.0 1.1 1.3 5.3 1.0 1.6 5.4 2.9

FOX 3 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
1.0 0.5 3.3 1.3 1.6 2.4 2.0 2.7 1.6

JUST ANY 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
1.0 3.8 1.0 2.4 5.7 1.6

NONE 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 3.3 1.0 1.6 3.7 2.7

OTHER 12 10 0 2 0 5 3 4 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 3
4.0 5.3 2.5 5.2 4.8 4.7 8.3 3.7 2.7 5.7 12.5 4.3 4.9

DON'T KNOW 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 5.3 2.0

SOMETHING ELSE: 37 19 4 14 1 11 8 11 6 5 2 5 2 6 3 3 2 9
12.3 10.0 13.3 17.5 5.3 11.5 12.7 12.9 16.2 20.8 7.4 10.0 7.4 16.2 8.6 18.8 8.7 14.8

NEWSPAPERS (I.E. DAILY 14 6 1 7 0 4 4 3 3 2 0 3 1 1 1 2 0 4
PILOT, ORANGE COUNTY 4.7 3.2 3.3 8.8 4.2 6.3 3.5 8.1 8.3 6.0 3.7 2.7 2.9 12.5 6.6
REGISTER, ETC.

FROM NEIGHBORS/FRIENDS/ 9 5 2 2 0 1 1 5 2 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 1
FAMILY 3.0 2.6 6.7 2.5 1.0 1.6 5.9 5.4 8.3 3.7 4.0 8.1 1.6

TELEPHONE SURVEYS 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
0.7 0.5 1.3 1.0 1.6 4.3 1.6

FLYERS/HANDOUTS 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0.7 0.5 1.3 5.3 1.0 6.3 4.3

NONE 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0.3 0.5 1.6 1.6

OTHER 10 5 1 4 0 5 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 2
3.3 2.6 3.3 5.0 5.2 1.6 3.5 2.7 4.2 3.7 3.7 5.4 5.7 6.3 3.3

LOS ANGELES TIMES 27 13 6 8 2 5 4 12 4 2 2 7 6 2 1 0 3 4
9.0 6.8 20.0 10.0 10.5 5.2 6.3 14.1 10.8 8.3 7.4 14.0 22.2 5.4 2.9 13.0 6.6

LOCAL RADIO 22 13 4 5 2 8 4 5 3 2 5 4 1 1 2 2 1 4
7.3 6.8 13.3 6.3 10.5 8.3 6.3 5.9 8.1 8.3 18.5 8.0 3.7 2.7 5.7 12.5 4.3 6.6

NPR 5 2 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
1.7 1.1 3.8 3.1 1.6 2.7 7.4 3.7 3.3

KFI 640 AM 3 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
1.0 1.1 3.3 2.1 1.2 2.0 3.3

KPCC 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0.7 0.5 3.3 1.0 1.2 6.3 4.3

UNSPECIFIED NEWS STATIONS 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 3.3 1.6 2.7 3.7 2.9

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

PUBLIC RADIO STATION 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
(UNSPECIFIED) 0.7 0.5 1.3 1.0 1.6 2.9 6.3

JUST ANY STATION/CAN'T 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPECIFY 0.7 0.5 3.3 5.3 1.2 3.7 2.0

OTHER 6 5 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
2.0 2.6 1.3 5.3 1.0 1.6 2.4 2.7 8.3 3.7 4.0 2.7

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUCH 20 8 1 11 1 10 5 3 1 1 4 2 2 1 2 1 3 4
AS FACEBOOK AND TWITTER 6.7 4.2 3.3 13.8 5.3 10.4 7.9 3.5 2.7 4.2 14.8 4.0 7.4 2.7 5.7 6.3 13.0 6.6

FACEBOOK 15 5 1 9 0 7 5 3 0 0 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 3
5.0 2.6 3.3 11.3 7.3 7.9 3.5 11.1 4.0 7.4 2.7 5.7 6.3 4.3 4.9

OTHER 5 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
1.7 1.6 2.5 5.3 3.1 2.7 4.2 3.7 8.7 1.6

MAGAZINES 10 8 1 1 0 4 3 1 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 3
3.3 4.2 3.3 1.3 4.2 4.8 1.2 5.4 7.4 2.0 3.7 5.4 2.9 4.9

IRVINE COMMUNITY NEWS AND 3 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
VIEWS 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 3.2 3.7 2.7 1.6

THE REGISTER 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 3.3 1.0 1.2 2.7 2.9

OTHER 5 5 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
1.7 2.6 2.1 1.6 5.4 3.7 2.0 3.7 3.3

NOTHING 9 7 0 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1
3.0 3.7 2.5 5.3 2.1 3.2 3.5 2.7 4.2 3.7 6.0 3.7 2.9 6.3 1.6

UNSURE 10 8 1 1 1 7 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 2
3.3 4.2 3.3 1.3 5.3 7.3 2.4 3.7 2.0 2.7 5.7 12.5 4.3 3.3

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.3 0.5 1.0 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 58 26 4 20 8 8 17 19 13 19 19 4 42 1 8 3 0 0 58 0 29 29
19.3 24.5 11.1 23.8 10.8 15.4 23.9 26.8 14.8 19.8 17.8 23.5 21.1 20.0 22.2 8.8 19.4 16.7 23.0

LOCAL TELEVISION 56 16 12 13 15 8 13 13 20 15 21 1 43 0 4 7 1 0 56 0 29 27
18.7 15.1 33.3 15.5 20.3 15.4 18.3 18.3 22.7 15.6 19.6 5.9 21.6 11.1 20.6 11.1 18.7 16.7 21.4

FOX 13 5 3 0 5 3 2 4 4 2 5 0 11 0 0 2 0 0 13 0 8 5
4.3 4.7 8.3 6.8 5.8 2.8 5.6 4.5 2.1 4.7 5.5 5.9 4.3 4.6 4.0

ABC - CHANNEL 7 11 2 6 0 3 1 5 1 3 2 5 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 11 0 4 7
3.7 1.9 16.7 4.1 1.9 7.0 1.4 3.4 2.1 4.7 4.5 2.8 2.9 3.7 2.3 5.6

CHANNEL 5 9 4 2 2 1 1 3 5 1 2 3 1 4 0 1 2 1 0 9 0 4 5
3.0 3.8 5.6 2.4 1.4 1.9 4.2 7.0 1.1 2.1 2.8 5.9 2.0 2.8 5.9 11.1 3.0 2.3 4.0

CNN 6 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 4 3 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 6 0 4 2
2.0 2.8 3.6 2.7 1.4 4.5 3.1 1.9 1.5 2.8 5.9 2.0 2.3 1.6

NEWS CHANNELS 5 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 3
(UNSPECIFIED) 1.7 4.8 1.4 2.3 2.1 2.8 2.5 1.7 1.1 2.4

NBC - CHANNEL 4 4 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 3 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 3
1.3 0.9 5.6 1.2 2.8 3.4 1.0 0.9 1.5 2.9 1.3 0.6 2.4

CBS - CHANNEL 2 4 2 2 0 0 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 3
1.3 1.9 5.6 1.9 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.0 1.3 0.6 2.4

PBS/PUBLIC BROADCASTING 3 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
SERVICE 1.0 0.9 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.4 2.3 1.0 1.0 2.8 1.0 1.7

CHANNEL 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 2.8 1.2 1.4 1.1 2.1 0.5 2.8 0.7 0.6 0.8

LOCAL STATION 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 0.9 2.8 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.5 2.9 0.7 0.6 0.8

OTHER 7 2 0 1 4 0 1 0 3 2 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 6
2.3 1.9 1.2 5.4 1.4 3.4 2.1 3.7 3.5 2.3 0.6 4.8

DON'T KNOW 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6

A WEBSITE OR BLOG 50 17 10 7 16 11 12 10 9 11 23 4 33 1 6 6 0 0 50 0 35 15
16.7 16.0 27.8 8.3 21.6 21.2 16.9 14.1 10.2 11.5 21.5 23.5 16.6 20.0 16.7 17.6 16.7 20.1 11.9

YAHOO 10 3 2 1 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 1 7 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 7 3
3.3 2.8 5.6 1.2 5.4 5.8 4.2 2.8 2.3 2.1 3.7 5.9 3.5 5.6 3.3 4.0 2.4

CNN 9 2 1 2 4 1 3 1 3 2 4 0 6 1 1 1 0 0 9 0 6 3
3.0 1.9 2.8 2.4 5.4 1.9 4.2 1.4 3.4 2.1 3.7 3.0 20.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.4 2.4

GOOGLE 7 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 7 0 5 2
2.3 1.9 5.6 1.2 2.7 5.8 2.8 1.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 5.9 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.3 2.9 1.6

REDDIT 4 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0
1.3 0.9 2.8 2.7 1.9 1.4 2.1 1.9 5.9 1.5 1.3 2.3

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

NEWS WEBSITES 4 4 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 4 0
1.3 3.8 1.9 1.4 2.8 1.9 11.8 0.5 2.8 1.3 2.3

NBC 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 20.0 1.0 1.7

FOX 3 1 1 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.4 3.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 2.8 1.0 1.1 0.8

JUST ANY 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.5 1.0 1.1 0.8

NONE 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2
0.7 2.8 1.4 1.9 0.5 2.9 0.7 1.6

OTHER 12 3 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 5 5 1 7 0 1 3 0 0 12 0 9 3
4.0 2.8 5.6 3.6 5.4 3.8 4.2 2.8 2.3 5.2 4.7 5.9 3.5 2.8 8.8 4.0 5.2 2.4

DON'T KNOW 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

SOMETHING ELSE: 37 14 1 14 8 8 10 6 16 13 10 1 23 0 2 8 3 0 37 0 18 19
12.3 13.2 2.8 16.7 10.8 15.4 14.1 8.5 18.2 13.5 9.3 5.9 11.6 5.6 23.5 33.3 12.4 10.3 15.1

NEWSPAPERS (I.E. DAILY 14 4 0 7 3 5 5 3 7 3 2 1 9 0 2 2 0 0 14 0 6 8
PILOT, ORANGE COUNTY 4.7 3.8 8.3 4.1 9.6 7.0 4.2 8.0 3.1 1.9 5.9 4.5 5.6 5.9 4.7 3.4 6.3
REGISTER, ETC.

FROM NEIGHBORS/FRIENDS/ 9 3 0 4 2 0 1 1 4 4 4 0 6 0 0 1 2 0 9 0 4 5
FAMILY 3.0 2.8 4.8 2.7 1.4 1.4 4.5 4.2 3.7 3.0 2.9 22.2 3.0 2.3 4.0

TELEPHONE SURVEYS 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0
0.7 0.9 2.8 3.8 1.1 1.0 0.5 2.9 0.7 1.1

FLYERS/HANDOUTS 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0
0.7 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.5 11.1 0.7 1.1

NONE 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6

OTHER 10 6 0 3 1 1 4 2 4 5 2 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 10 0 4 6
3.3 5.7 3.6 1.4 1.9 5.6 2.8 4.5 5.2 1.9 3.0 11.8 3.3 2.3 4.8

LOS ANGELES TIMES 27 13 2 9 3 6 6 8 7 13 7 2 20 0 2 1 2 0 27 0 12 15
9.0 12.3 5.6 10.7 4.1 11.5 8.5 11.3 8.0 13.5 6.5 11.8 10.1 5.6 2.9 22.2 9.0 6.9 11.9

LOCAL RADIO 22 5 2 10 5 4 4 6 10 9 5 3 11 2 3 3 0 0 22 0 13 9
7.3 4.7 5.6 11.9 6.8 7.7 5.6 8.5 11.4 9.4 4.7 17.6 5.5 40.0 8.3 8.8 7.4 7.5 7.1

NPR 5 0 2 0 3 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 2 3
1.7 5.6 4.1 1.9 2.8 1.4 2.3 1.9 11.8 0.5 5.9 1.7 1.1 2.4

KFI 640 AM 3 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.4 2.3 1.0 0.5 20.0 2.8 1.0 1.1 0.8

KPCC 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
0.7 2.4 2.3 2.1 5.9 0.5 0.7 1.1

UNSPECIFIED NEWS STATIONS 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2
0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.5 2.9 0.7 1.6

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q2. What is your number one source for news and information about local politics, government and related issues?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

PUBLIC RADIO STATION 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
(UNSPECIFIED) 0.7 0.9 1.2 3.8 2.8 1.0 0.7 1.1

JUST ANY STATION/CAN'T 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
SPECIFY 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8

OTHER 6 2 0 4 0 0 1 1 2 4 2 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 6 0 4 2
2.0 1.9 4.8 1.4 1.4 2.3 4.2 1.9 1.5 20.0 5.6 2.0 2.3 1.6

SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUCH 20 6 2 6 6 4 3 2 7 9 7 0 13 0 4 3 0 0 20 0 19 1
AS FACEBOOK AND TWITTER 6.7 5.7 5.6 7.1 8.1 7.7 4.2 2.8 8.0 9.4 6.5 6.5 11.1 8.8 6.7 10.9 0.8

FACEBOOK 15 6 1 6 2 4 3 2 5 8 4 0 9 0 4 2 0 0 15 0 15 0
5.0 5.7 2.8 7.1 2.7 7.7 4.2 2.8 5.7 8.3 3.7 4.5 11.1 5.9 5.0 8.6

OTHER 5 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 4 1
1.7 2.8 5.4 2.3 1.0 2.8 2.0 2.9 1.7 2.3 0.8

MAGAZINES 10 3 0 3 4 2 3 3 5 2 2 1 4 0 3 1 1 1 9 0 5 5
3.3 2.8 3.6 5.4 3.8 4.2 4.2 5.7 2.1 1.9 5.9 2.0 8.3 2.9 11.1 100.0 3.0 2.9 4.0

IRVINE COMMUNITY NEWS AND 3 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 2
VIEWS 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.9 5.9 1.0 100.0 0.7 0.6 1.6

THE REGISTER 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 2.9 11.1 0.7 0.6 0.8

OTHER 5 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 0.9 2.4 2.7 1.9 1.4 1.4 3.4 2.1 0.9 1.0 8.3 1.7 1.7 1.6

NOTHING 9 2 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 1 0 1 2 0 9 0 4 5
3.0 1.9 2.8 8.1 8.4 2.5 20.0 2.9 22.2 3.0 2.3 4.0

UNSURE 10 4 2 2 2 1 3 4 1 5 3 1 5 0 3 1 0 0 10 0 9 1
3.3 3.8 5.6 2.4 2.7 1.9 4.2 5.6 1.1 5.2 2.8 5.9 2.5 8.3 2.9 3.3 5.2 0.8

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q3. When you read the Orange County Register for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: Orange County Register as source for news and information
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 58 31 27 35 14 8 30 10 18 43 15 0 5 19 15 19 13 18 11 16
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 55 29 26 34 13 7 30 9 16 41 14 0 4 19 14 18 13 16 10 16
94.8 93.5 96.3 97.1 92.9 87.5 100.0 90.0 88.9 95.3 93.3 80.0 100.0 93.3 94.7 100.0 88.9 90.9 100.0

NO 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
3.4 3.2 3.7 2.9 7.1 10.0 5.6 4.7 20.0 5.3 5.6 9.1

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
1.7 3.2 12.5 5.6 6.7 6.7 5.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q3. When you read the Orange County Register for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: Orange County Register as source for news and information
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 58 16 19 7 1 7 7 10 25 4 4 9 5 30 7 4 8 9 0 0 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 55 15 19 6 1 7 6 10 24 4 3 8 5 29 7 3 8 8 0 0 0
94.8 93.8 100.0 85.7 100.0 100.0 85.7 100.0 96.0 100.0 75.0 88.9 100.0 96.7 100.0 75.0 100.0 88.9

NO 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
3.4 6.3 14.3 4.0 11.1 3.3 11.1

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1.7 14.3 25.0 25.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q3. When you read the Orange County Register for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: Orange County Register as source for news and information
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 58 44 4 10 1 19 11 16 11 4 8 8 2 9 8 2 4 13
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 55 41 4 10 1 17 11 15 11 3 7 7 2 9 8 2 4 13
94.8 93.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 89.5 100.0 93.8 100.0 75.0 87.5 87.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

NO 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.4 4.5 5.3 6.3 12.5 12.5

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.7 2.3 5.3 25.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q3. When you read the Orange County Register for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: Orange County Register as source for news and information
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 58 26 4 20 8 8 17 19 13 19 19 4 42 1 8 3 0 0 58 0 29 29
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 55 25 4 18 8 7 17 19 11 18 18 4 39 1 8 3 0 0 55 0 26 29
94.8 96.2 100.0 90.0 100.0 87.5 100.0 100.0 84.6 94.7 94.7 100.0 92.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 94.8 89.7 100.0

NO 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
3.4 3.8 5.0 7.7 5.3 5.3 4.8 3.4 6.9

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
1.7 5.0 12.5 7.7 2.4 1.7 3.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q4. When you read the Los Angeles Times for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: LA Times as source for news and information
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 27 11 16 10 13 4 6 11 10 22 4 1 2 9 6 10 6 5 5 11
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 25 11 14 10 12 3 6 10 9 21 3 1 2 8 6 9 6 5 4 10
92.6 100.0 87.5 100.0 92.3 75.0 100.0 90.9 90.0 95.5 75.0 100.0 100.0 88.9 100.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 80.0 90.9

NO 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
7.4 12.5 7.7 25.0 9.1 10.0 4.5 25.0 11.1 10.0 20.0 9.1

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q4. When you read the Los Angeles Times for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: LA Times as source for news and information
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 27 4 6 1 3 6 7 5 5 3 1 3 10 11 5 4 4 1 1 1 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 25 4 6 1 2 6 6 5 5 2 1 3 9 11 5 3 4 0 1 1 0
92.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 100.0 85.7 100.0 100.0 66.7 100.0 100.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 75.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

NO 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
7.4 33.3 14.3 33.3 10.0 25.0 100.0

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q4. When you read the Los Angeles Times for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: LA Times as source for news and information
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 27 13 6 8 2 5 4 12 4 2 2 7 6 2 1 0 3 4
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 25 11 6 8 2 4 4 11 4 2 1 6 6 2 1 0 3 4
92.6 84.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 80.0 100.0 91.7 100.0 100.0 50.0 85.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

NO 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
7.4 15.4 20.0 8.3 50.0 14.3

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q4. When you read the Los Angeles Times for news and information about politics, government and related issues in Irvine, do you read the local section?

Base: LA Times as source for news and information
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 27 13 2 9 3 6 6 8 7 13 7 2 20 0 2 1 2 0 27 0 12 15
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

YES 25 13 2 7 3 5 6 8 5 12 7 2 18 0 2 1 2 0 25 0 10 15
92.6 100.0 100.0 77.8 100.0 83.3 100.0 100.0 71.4 92.3 100.0 100.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.6 83.3 100.0

NO 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
7.4 22.2 16.7 28.6 7.7 10.0 7.4 16.7

UNSURE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q5. Do you think that the City of Irvine is on the right track or on the wrong track?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

RIGHT TRACK 149 85 64 63 45 36 53 36 60 108 40 1 33 58 29 29 58 27 33 31
49.7 58.6 41.3 51.6 46.9 50.7 51.0 46.2 50.8 48.0 54.1 100.0 64.7 55.2 43.3 37.7 68.2 45.0 46.5 36.9

WRONG TRACK 117 45 72 47 40 25 41 32 44 92 25 0 11 36 30 40 20 25 27 45
39.0 31.0 46.5 38.5 41.7 35.2 39.4 41.0 37.3 40.9 33.8 21.6 34.3 44.8 51.9 23.5 41.7 38.0 53.6

UNSURE 31 14 17 12 10 8 10 9 12 23 8 0 7 11 7 6 7 7 11 6
10.3 9.7 11.0 9.8 10.4 11.3 9.6 11.5 10.2 10.2 10.8 13.7 10.5 10.4 7.8 8.2 11.7 15.5 7.1

REFUSED 3 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 2
1.0 0.7 1.3 1.0 2.8 1.3 1.7 0.9 1.4 1.5 2.6 1.7 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q5. Do you think that the City of Irvine is on the right track or on the wrong track?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

RIGHT TRACK 149 33 30 27 9 22 23 30 33 27 9 29 16 33 18 22 41 31 2 2 0
49.7 56.9 46.9 58.7 36.0 62.9 37.7 62.5 44.6 57.4 37.5 56.9 35.6 38.4 45.0 51.2 55.4 70.5 66.7 20.0

WRONG TRACK 117 18 29 12 13 12 28 13 34 14 11 15 25 45 17 18 22 9 1 5 0
39.0 31.0 45.3 26.1 52.0 34.3 45.9 27.1 45.9 29.8 45.8 29.4 55.6 52.3 42.5 41.9 29.7 20.5 33.3 50.0

UNSURE 31 7 5 6 2 1 9 5 7 6 2 7 3 7 3 3 11 4 0 3 0
10.3 12.1 7.8 13.0 8.0 2.9 14.8 10.4 9.5 12.8 8.3 13.7 6.7 8.1 7.5 7.0 14.9 9.1 30.0

REFUSED 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.0 2.2 4.0 1.6 8.3 2.2 1.2 5.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q5. Do you think that the City of Irvine is on the right track or on the wrong track?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

RIGHT TRACK 149 93 14 42 9 52 31 44 13 17 13 28 10 18 11 12 10 30
49.7 48.9 46.7 52.5 47.4 54.2 49.2 51.8 35.1 70.8 48.1 56.0 37.0 48.6 31.4 75.0 43.5 49.2

WRONG TRACK 117 78 15 24 6 31 27 32 21 7 11 18 10 15 21 1 9 25
39.0 41.1 50.0 30.0 31.6 32.3 42.9 37.6 56.8 29.2 40.7 36.0 37.0 40.5 60.0 6.3 39.1 41.0

UNSURE 31 16 1 14 4 12 5 7 3 0 3 3 6 4 3 3 4 5
10.3 8.4 3.3 17.5 21.1 12.5 7.9 8.2 8.1 11.1 6.0 22.2 10.8 8.6 18.8 17.4 8.2

REFUSED 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
1.0 1.6 1.0 2.4 2.0 3.7 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q5. Do you think that the City of Irvine is on the right track or on the wrong track?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

RIGHT TRACK 149 83 17 22 27 26 49 45 37 40 49 7 92 3 24 20 3 0 149 0 95 54
49.7 78.3 47.2 26.2 36.5 50.0 69.0 63.4 42.0 41.7 45.8 41.2 46.2 60.0 66.7 58.8 33.3 49.8 54.6 42.9

WRONG TRACK 117 18 16 58 25 21 16 20 48 50 37 8 91 2 6 6 4 1 116 0 56 61
39.0 17.0 44.4 69.0 33.8 40.4 22.5 28.2 54.5 52.1 34.6 47.1 45.7 40.0 16.7 17.6 44.4 100.0 38.8 32.2 48.4

UNSURE 31 5 3 2 21 4 5 5 3 5 20 2 15 0 6 7 1 0 31 0 22 9
10.3 4.7 8.3 2.4 28.4 7.7 7.0 7.0 3.4 5.2 18.7 11.8 7.5 16.7 20.6 11.1 10.4 12.6 7.1

REFUSED 3 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 2
1.0 2.4 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.5 2.9 11.1 1.0 0.6 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q6. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine Mayor is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 129 68 61 66 35 25 55 29 45 95 34 0 25 50 24 30 43 25 32 29
------------- 43.0 46.9 39.4 54.1 36.5 35.2 52.9 37.2 38.1 42.2 45.9 49.0 47.6 35.8 39.0 50.6 41.7 45.1 34.5

STRONGLY APPROVE 54 34 20 31 14 8 25 11 18 40 14 0 7 23 7 17 19 15 11 9
18.0 23.4 12.9 25.4 14.6 11.3 24.0 14.1 15.3 17.8 18.9 13.7 21.9 10.4 22.1 22.4 25.0 15.5 10.7

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 75 34 41 35 21 17 30 18 27 55 20 0 18 27 17 13 24 10 21 20
25.0 23.4 26.5 28.7 21.9 23.9 28.8 23.1 22.9 24.4 27.0 35.3 25.7 25.4 16.9 28.2 16.7 29.6 23.8

DISAPPROVE [NET] 108 45 63 31 46 26 28 37 43 82 26 0 11 35 29 33 21 24 25 38
---------------- 36.0 31.0 40.6 25.4 47.9 36.6 26.9 47.4 36.4 36.4 35.1 21.6 33.3 43.3 42.9 24.7 40.0 35.2 45.2

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 79 34 45 26 34 15 23 27 29 60 19 0 7 22 20 30 16 18 13 32
26.3 23.4 29.0 21.3 35.4 21.1 22.1 34.6 24.6 26.7 25.7 13.7 21.0 29.9 39.0 18.8 30.0 18.3 38.1

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 29 11 18 5 12 11 5 10 14 22 7 0 4 13 9 3 5 6 12 6
9.7 7.6 11.6 4.1 12.5 15.5 4.8 12.8 11.9 9.8 9.5 7.8 12.4 13.4 3.9 5.9 10.0 16.9 7.1

UNSURE 57 27 30 22 15 17 19 12 26 43 13 1 13 19 12 13 19 8 13 17
19.0 18.6 19.4 18.0 15.6 23.9 18.3 15.4 22.0 19.1 17.6 100.0 25.5 18.1 17.9 16.9 22.4 13.3 18.3 20.2

REFUSED 6 5 1 3 0 3 2 0 4 5 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 0
2.0 3.4 0.6 2.5 4.2 1.9 3.4 2.2 1.4 3.9 1.0 3.0 1.3 2.4 5.0 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q6. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine Mayor is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 129 33 33 18 7 14 21 30 36 17 8 25 10 34 13 17 33 25 2 5 0
------------- 43.0 56.9 51.6 39.1 28.0 40.0 34.4 62.5 48.6 36.2 33.3 49.0 22.2 39.5 32.5 39.5 44.6 56.8 66.7 50.0

STRONGLY APPROVE 54 18 13 7 1 8 6 13 18 5 3 11 3 17 8 7 13 7 1 1 0
18.0 31.0 20.3 15.2 4.0 22.9 9.8 27.1 24.3 10.6 12.5 21.6 6.7 19.8 20.0 16.3 17.6 15.9 33.3 10.0

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 75 15 20 11 6 6 15 17 18 12 5 14 7 17 5 10 20 18 1 4 0
25.0 25.9 31.3 23.9 24.0 17.1 24.6 35.4 24.3 25.5 20.8 27.5 15.6 19.8 12.5 23.3 27.0 40.9 33.3 40.0

DISAPPROVE [NET] 108 13 18 13 13 16 30 9 22 14 12 18 28 37 18 17 22 10 1 3 0
---------------- 36.0 22.4 28.1 28.3 52.0 45.7 49.2 18.8 29.7 29.8 50.0 35.3 62.2 43.0 45.0 39.5 29.7 22.7 33.3 30.0

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 79 12 14 7 8 12 22 6 20 9 6 10 24 31 12 12 15 6 1 2 0
26.3 20.7 21.9 15.2 32.0 34.3 36.1 12.5 27.0 19.1 25.0 19.6 53.3 36.0 30.0 27.9 20.3 13.6 33.3 20.0

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 29 1 4 6 5 4 8 3 2 5 6 8 4 6 6 5 7 4 0 1 0
9.7 1.7 6.3 13.0 20.0 11.4 13.1 6.3 2.7 10.6 25.0 15.7 8.9 7.0 15.0 11.6 9.5 9.1 10.0

UNSURE 57 10 12 12 5 5 10 8 14 14 3 8 7 13 9 8 16 9 0 2 0
19.0 17.2 18.8 26.1 20.0 14.3 16.4 16.7 18.9 29.8 12.5 15.7 15.6 15.1 22.5 18.6 21.6 20.5 20.0

REFUSED 6 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0
2.0 3.4 1.6 6.5 2.1 2.7 4.3 4.2 2.3 2.3 4.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q6. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine Mayor is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 129 77 14 38 6 43 27 38 15 10 10 22 13 17 12 6 9 30
------------- 43.0 40.5 46.7 47.5 31.6 44.8 42.9 44.7 40.5 41.7 37.0 44.0 48.1 45.9 34.3 37.5 39.1 49.2

STRONGLY APPROVE 54 34 7 13 1 16 14 15 8 4 5 8 6 9 6 1 1 14
18.0 17.9 23.3 16.3 5.3 16.7 22.2 17.6 21.6 16.7 18.5 16.0 22.2 24.3 17.1 6.3 4.3 23.0

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 75 43 7 25 5 27 13 23 7 6 5 14 7 8 6 5 8 16
25.0 22.6 23.3 31.3 26.3 28.1 20.6 27.1 18.9 25.0 18.5 28.0 25.9 21.6 17.1 31.3 34.8 26.2

DISAPPROVE [NET] 108 70 12 26 6 27 28 32 15 7 12 16 9 15 15 3 8 23
---------------- 36.0 36.8 40.0 32.5 31.6 28.1 44.4 37.6 40.5 29.2 44.4 32.0 33.3 40.5 42.9 18.8 34.8 37.7

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 79 50 10 19 5 18 19 25 12 7 6 12 7 12 12 2 5 16
26.3 26.3 33.3 23.8 26.3 18.8 30.2 29.4 32.4 29.2 22.2 24.0 25.9 32.4 34.3 12.5 21.7 26.2

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 29 20 2 7 1 9 9 7 3 0 6 4 2 3 3 1 3 7
9.7 10.5 6.7 8.8 5.3 9.4 14.3 8.2 8.1 22.2 8.0 7.4 8.1 8.6 6.3 13.0 11.5

UNSURE 57 41 3 13 6 23 8 14 6 6 4 11 4 5 7 7 5 8
19.0 21.6 10.0 16.3 31.6 24.0 12.7 16.5 16.2 25.0 14.8 22.0 14.8 13.5 20.0 43.8 21.7 13.1

REFUSED 6 2 1 3 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
2.0 1.1 3.3 3.8 5.3 3.1 1.2 2.7 4.2 3.7 2.0 3.7 2.9 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q6. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine Mayor is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 129 88 10 14 17 27 46 49 25 29 40 7 80 3 20 15 4 0 129 0 77 52
------------- 43.0 83.0 27.8 16.7 23.0 51.9 64.8 69.0 28.4 30.2 37.4 41.2 40.2 60.0 55.6 44.1 44.4 43.1 44.3 41.3

STRONGLY APPROVE 54 44 2 2 6 7 21 28 7 2 21 3 38 2 3 7 1 0 54 0 32 22
18.0 41.5 5.6 2.4 8.1 13.5 29.6 39.4 8.0 2.1 19.6 17.6 19.1 40.0 8.3 20.6 11.1 18.1 18.4 17.5

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 75 44 8 12 11 20 25 21 18 27 19 4 42 1 17 8 3 0 75 0 45 30
25.0 41.5 22.2 14.3 14.9 38.5 35.2 29.6 20.5 28.1 17.8 23.5 21.1 20.0 47.2 23.5 33.3 25.1 25.9 23.8

DISAPPROVE [NET] 108 4 20 61 23 18 13 11 53 54 31 7 77 2 9 11 2 1 107 0 55 53
---------------- 36.0 3.8 55.6 72.6 31.1 34.6 18.3 15.5 60.2 56.3 29.0 41.2 38.7 40.0 25.0 32.4 22.2 100.0 35.8 31.6 42.1

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 79 3 15 44 17 13 7 6 40 42 23 5 58 2 4 8 2 1 78 0 39 40
26.3 2.8 41.7 52.4 23.0 25.0 9.9 8.5 45.5 43.8 21.5 29.4 29.1 40.0 11.1 23.5 22.2 100.0 26.1 22.4 31.7

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 29 1 5 17 6 5 6 5 13 12 8 2 19 0 5 3 0 0 29 0 16 13
9.7 0.9 13.9 20.2 8.1 9.6 8.5 7.0 14.8 12.5 7.5 11.8 9.5 13.9 8.8 9.7 9.2 10.3

UNSURE 57 13 5 8 31 6 12 11 8 12 32 3 38 0 5 8 3 0 57 0 38 19
19.0 12.3 13.9 9.5 41.9 11.5 16.9 15.5 9.1 12.5 29.9 17.6 19.1 13.9 23.5 33.3 19.1 21.8 15.1

REFUSED 6 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 4 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 4 2
2.0 0.9 2.8 1.2 4.1 1.9 2.3 1.0 3.7 2.0 5.6 2.0 2.3 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q7. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine City Council is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 127 71 56 60 33 30 50 27 50 95 32 0 26 47 24 30 49 22 24 32
------------- 42.3 49.0 36.1 49.2 34.4 42.3 48.1 34.6 42.4 42.2 43.2 51.0 44.8 35.8 39.0 57.6 36.7 33.8 38.1

STRONGLY APPROVE 39 26 13 20 10 9 15 7 17 27 12 0 6 15 4 14 15 11 6 7
13.0 17.9 8.4 16.4 10.4 12.7 14.4 9.0 14.4 12.0 16.2 11.8 14.3 6.0 18.2 17.6 18.3 8.5 8.3

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 88 45 43 40 23 21 35 20 33 68 20 0 20 32 20 16 34 11 18 25
29.3 31.0 27.7 32.8 24.0 29.6 33.7 25.6 28.0 30.2 27.0 39.2 30.5 29.9 20.8 40.0 18.3 25.4 29.8

DISAPPROVE [NET] 105 47 58 30 47 23 25 38 42 83 21 1 12 38 29 26 22 25 28 30
---------------- 35.0 32.4 37.4 24.6 49.0 32.4 24.0 48.7 35.6 36.9 28.4 100.0 23.5 36.2 43.3 33.8 25.9 41.7 39.4 35.7

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 64 27 37 20 29 11 17 23 24 48 16 0 6 20 18 20 12 15 14 23
21.3 18.6 23.9 16.4 30.2 15.5 16.3 29.5 20.3 21.3 21.6 11.8 19.0 26.9 26.0 14.1 25.0 19.7 27.4

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 41 20 21 10 18 12 8 15 18 35 5 1 6 18 11 6 10 10 14 7
13.7 13.8 13.5 8.2 18.8 16.9 7.7 19.2 15.3 15.6 6.8 100.0 11.8 17.1 16.4 7.8 11.8 16.7 19.7 8.3

UNSURE 59 23 36 26 15 16 23 12 24 38 21 0 12 19 13 15 13 10 18 18
19.7 15.9 23.2 21.3 15.6 22.5 22.1 15.4 20.3 16.9 28.4 23.5 18.1 19.4 19.5 15.3 16.7 25.4 21.4

REFUSED 9 4 5 6 1 2 6 1 2 9 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 3 1 4
3.0 2.8 3.2 4.9 1.0 2.8 5.8 1.3 1.7 4.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 7.8 1.2 5.0 1.4 4.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q7. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine City Council is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 127 29 31 24 6 15 18 25 35 22 8 23 10 34 17 17 34 20 2 3 0
------------- 42.3 50.0 48.4 52.2 24.0 42.9 29.5 52.1 47.3 46.8 33.3 45.1 22.2 39.5 42.5 39.5 45.9 45.5 66.7 30.0

STRONGLY APPROVE 39 12 8 8 1 6 4 9 11 5 4 7 3 12 4 4 12 6 0 1 0
13.0 20.7 12.5 17.4 4.0 17.1 6.6 18.8 14.9 10.6 16.7 13.7 6.7 14.0 10.0 9.3 16.2 13.6 10.0

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 88 17 23 16 5 9 14 16 24 17 4 16 7 22 13 13 22 14 2 2 0
29.3 29.3 35.9 34.8 20.0 25.7 23.0 33.3 32.4 36.2 16.7 31.4 15.6 25.6 32.5 30.2 29.7 31.8 66.7 20.0

DISAPPROVE [NET] 105 19 11 11 12 15 32 12 18 14 9 19 28 35 14 18 19 13 1 5 0
---------------- 35.0 32.8 17.2 23.9 48.0 42.9 52.5 25.0 24.3 29.8 37.5 37.3 62.2 40.7 35.0 41.9 25.7 29.5 33.3 50.0

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 64 11 9 6 5 9 20 5 15 8 3 9 20 24 9 9 13 6 1 2 0
21.3 19.0 14.1 13.0 20.0 25.7 32.8 10.4 20.3 17.0 12.5 17.6 44.4 27.9 22.5 20.9 17.6 13.6 33.3 20.0

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 41 8 2 5 7 6 12 7 3 6 6 10 8 11 5 9 6 7 0 3 0
13.7 13.8 3.1 10.9 28.0 17.1 19.7 14.6 4.1 12.8 25.0 19.6 17.8 12.8 12.5 20.9 8.1 15.9 30.0

UNSURE 59 9 17 9 7 4 11 10 16 10 6 9 6 12 8 7 19 11 0 2 0
19.7 15.5 26.6 19.6 28.0 11.4 18.0 20.8 21.6 21.3 25.0 17.6 13.3 14.0 20.0 16.3 25.7 25.0 20.0

REFUSED 9 1 5 2 0 1 0 1 5 1 1 0 1 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
3.0 1.7 7.8 4.3 2.9 2.1 6.8 2.1 4.2 2.2 5.8 2.5 2.3 2.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q7. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine City Council is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 127 76 13 38 6 40 29 40 12 9 9 20 12 17 8 10 10 32
------------- 42.3 40.0 43.3 47.5 31.6 41.7 46.0 47.1 32.4 37.5 33.3 40.0 44.4 45.9 22.9 62.5 43.5 52.5

STRONGLY APPROVE 39 23 6 10 1 11 11 11 5 5 3 6 6 8 3 1 0 7
13.0 12.1 20.0 12.5 5.3 11.5 17.5 12.9 13.5 20.8 11.1 12.0 22.2 21.6 8.6 6.3 11.5

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 88 53 7 28 5 29 18 29 7 4 6 14 6 9 5 9 10 25
29.3 27.9 23.3 35.0 26.3 30.2 28.6 34.1 18.9 16.7 22.2 28.0 22.2 24.3 14.3 56.3 43.5 41.0

DISAPPROVE [NET] 105 70 11 24 7 29 22 33 14 8 12 18 10 12 16 4 5 20
---------------- 35.0 36.8 36.7 30.0 36.8 30.2 34.9 38.8 37.8 33.3 44.4 36.0 37.0 32.4 45.7 25.0 21.7 32.8

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 64 44 6 14 3 18 12 21 10 6 7 12 6 8 11 1 1 12
21.3 23.2 20.0 17.5 15.8 18.8 19.0 24.7 27.0 25.0 25.9 24.0 22.2 21.6 31.4 6.3 4.3 19.7

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 41 26 5 10 4 11 10 12 4 2 5 6 4 4 5 3 4 8
13.7 13.7 16.7 12.5 21.1 11.5 15.9 14.1 10.8 8.3 18.5 12.0 14.8 10.8 14.3 18.8 17.4 13.1

UNSURE 59 38 5 16 5 25 12 9 8 7 5 9 4 8 10 2 6 8
19.7 20.0 16.7 20.0 26.3 26.0 19.0 10.6 21.6 29.2 18.5 18.0 14.8 21.6 28.6 12.5 26.1 13.1

REFUSED 9 6 1 2 1 2 0 3 3 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 2 1
3.0 3.2 3.3 2.5 5.3 2.1 3.5 8.1 3.7 6.0 3.7 2.9 8.7 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q7. Do you approve or disapprove of the job that the Irvine City Council is doing? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (approve/disapprove)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

APPROVE [NET] 127 83 13 15 16 27 44 46 29 32 37 6 84 3 18 14 2 0 127 0 73 54
------------- 42.3 78.3 36.1 17.9 21.6 51.9 62.0 64.8 33.0 33.3 34.6 35.3 42.2 60.0 50.0 41.2 22.2 42.5 42.0 42.9

STRONGLY APPROVE 39 30 2 1 6 6 16 16 8 6 13 3 27 1 4 3 1 0 39 0 24 15
13.0 28.3 5.6 1.2 8.1 11.5 22.5 22.5 9.1 6.3 12.1 17.6 13.6 20.0 11.1 8.8 11.1 13.0 13.8 11.9

SOMEWHAT APPROVE 88 53 11 14 10 21 28 30 21 26 24 3 57 2 14 11 1 0 88 0 49 39
29.3 50.0 30.6 16.7 13.5 40.4 39.4 42.3 23.9 27.1 22.4 17.6 28.6 40.0 38.9 32.4 11.1 29.4 28.2 31.0

DISAPPROVE [NET] 105 7 17 59 22 22 13 12 46 51 31 5 76 2 10 8 4 0 105 0 59 46
---------------- 35.0 6.6 47.2 70.2 29.7 42.3 18.3 16.9 52.3 53.1 29.0 29.4 38.2 40.0 27.8 23.5 44.4 35.1 33.9 36.5

STRONGLY DISAPPROVE 64 2 12 39 11 14 8 6 29 34 17 2 49 2 4 5 2 0 64 0 34 30
21.3 1.9 33.3 46.4 14.9 26.9 11.3 8.5 33.0 35.4 15.9 11.8 24.6 40.0 11.1 14.7 22.2 21.4 19.5 23.8

SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE 41 5 5 20 11 8 5 6 17 17 14 3 27 0 6 3 2 0 41 0 25 16
13.7 4.7 13.9 23.8 14.9 15.4 7.0 8.5 19.3 17.7 13.1 17.6 13.6 16.7 8.8 22.2 13.7 14.4 12.7

UNSURE 59 14 5 8 32 2 11 11 11 11 35 6 31 0 7 12 3 1 58 0 38 21
19.7 13.2 13.9 9.5 43.2 3.8 15.5 15.5 12.5 11.5 32.7 35.3 15.6 19.4 35.3 33.3 100.0 19.4 21.8 16.7

REFUSED 9 2 1 2 4 1 3 2 2 2 4 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 9 0 4 5
3.0 1.9 2.8 2.4 5.4 1.9 4.2 2.8 2.3 2.1 3.7 4.0 2.8 3.0 2.3 4.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q8. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

STEVEN CHOI

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 257 126 131 106 83 58 90 68 99 199 57 1 36 93 61 67 73 53 56 75
----- 85.7 86.9 84.5 86.9 86.5 81.7 86.5 87.2 83.9 88.4 77.0 100.0 70.6 88.6 91.0 87.0 85.9 88.3 78.9 89.3

FAVORABLE [NET] 110 65 45 62 22 23 52 18 40 88 22 0 13 43 28 26 41 24 15 30
--------------- 36.7 44.8 29.0 50.8 22.9 32.4 50.0 23.1 33.9 39.1 29.7 25.5 41.0 41.8 33.8 48.2 40.0 21.1 35.7

VERY FAVORABLE 45 30 15 30 7 7 26 6 13 36 9 0 3 20 7 15 16 14 7 8
15.0 20.7 9.7 24.6 7.3 9.9 25.0 7.7 11.0 16.0 12.2 5.9 19.0 10.4 19.5 18.8 23.3 9.9 9.5

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 65 35 30 32 15 16 26 12 27 52 13 0 10 23 21 11 25 10 8 22
21.7 24.1 19.4 26.2 15.6 22.5 25.0 15.4 22.9 23.1 17.6 19.6 21.9 31.3 14.3 29.4 16.7 11.3 26.2

NO OPINION 43 23 20 9 18 14 6 15 22 28 15 0 16 14 9 4 15 8 15 5
14.3 15.9 12.9 7.4 18.8 19.7 5.8 19.2 18.6 12.4 20.3 31.4 13.3 13.4 5.2 17.6 13.3 21.1 6.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 104 38 66 35 43 21 32 35 37 83 20 1 7 36 24 37 17 21 26 40
----------------- 34.7 26.2 42.6 28.7 44.8 29.6 30.8 44.9 31.4 36.9 27.0 100.0 13.7 34.3 35.8 48.1 20.0 35.0 36.6 47.6

VERY UNFAVORABLE 67 27 40 19 33 12 17 27 23 52 15 0 6 19 14 28 12 15 13 27
22.3 18.6 25.8 15.6 34.4 16.9 16.3 34.6 19.5 23.1 20.3 11.8 18.1 20.9 36.4 14.1 25.0 18.3 32.1

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 37 11 26 16 10 9 15 8 14 31 5 1 1 17 10 9 5 6 13 13
12.3 7.6 16.8 13.1 10.4 12.7 14.4 10.3 11.9 13.8 6.8 100.0 2.0 16.2 14.9 11.7 5.9 10.0 18.3 15.5

UNAWARE 33 13 20 11 11 10 10 9 14 19 14 0 14 8 3 8 9 4 13 7
------- 11.0 9.0 12.9 9.0 11.5 14.1 9.6 11.5 11.9 8.4 18.9 27.5 7.6 4.5 10.4 10.6 6.7 18.3 8.3

NEVER HEARD OF 33 13 20 11 11 10 10 9 14 19 14 0 14 8 3 8 9 4 13 7
11.0 9.0 12.9 9.0 11.5 14.1 9.6 11.5 11.9 8.4 18.9 27.5 7.6 4.5 10.4 10.6 6.7 18.3 8.3

UNSURE 7 4 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 5 2 0 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 1
2.3 2.8 1.9 1.6 2.1 4.2 1.9 1.3 3.4 2.2 2.7 2.0 2.9 3.0 1.3 2.4 3.3 2.8 1.2

REFUSED 3 2 1 3 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1.0 1.4 0.6 2.5 1.9 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.7 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q8. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

STEVEN CHOI

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 257 51 55 37 21 32 51 41 65 36 22 43 40 79 33 39 61 33 3 9 0
----- 85.7 87.9 85.9 80.4 84.0 91.4 83.6 85.4 87.8 76.6 91.7 84.3 88.9 91.9 82.5 90.7 82.4 75.0 100.0 90.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 110 32 30 18 5 12 10 26 36 15 8 12 10 32 16 17 27 14 1 3 0
--------------- 36.7 55.2 46.9 39.1 20.0 34.3 16.4 54.2 48.6 31.9 33.3 23.5 22.2 37.2 40.0 39.5 36.5 31.8 33.3 30.0

VERY FAVORABLE 45 17 13 6 1 6 1 12 18 5 2 5 2 15 8 7 10 4 0 1 0
15.0 29.3 20.3 13.0 4.0 17.1 1.6 25.0 24.3 10.6 8.3 9.8 4.4 17.4 20.0 16.3 13.5 9.1 10.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 65 15 17 12 4 6 9 14 18 10 6 7 8 17 8 10 17 10 1 2 0
21.7 25.9 26.6 26.1 16.0 17.1 14.8 29.2 24.3 21.3 25.0 13.7 17.8 19.8 20.0 23.3 23.0 22.7 33.3 20.0

NO OPINION 43 6 3 10 4 6 12 3 6 11 3 14 4 4 2 7 16 10 0 4 0
14.3 10.3 4.7 21.7 16.0 17.1 19.7 6.3 8.1 23.4 12.5 27.5 8.9 4.7 5.0 16.3 21.6 22.7 40.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 104 13 22 9 12 14 29 12 23 10 11 17 26 43 15 15 18 9 2 2 0
----------------- 34.7 22.4 34.4 19.6 48.0 40.0 47.5 25.0 31.1 21.3 45.8 33.3 57.8 50.0 37.5 34.9 24.3 20.5 66.7 20.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 67 8 11 5 7 12 21 5 14 6 6 11 22 30 8 8 12 6 2 1 0
22.3 13.8 17.2 10.9 28.0 34.3 34.4 10.4 18.9 12.8 25.0 21.6 48.9 34.9 20.0 18.6 16.2 13.6 66.7 10.0

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 37 5 11 4 5 2 8 7 9 4 5 6 4 13 7 7 6 3 0 1 0
12.3 8.6 17.2 8.7 20.0 5.7 13.1 14.6 12.2 8.5 20.8 11.8 8.9 15.1 17.5 16.3 8.1 6.8 10.0

UNAWARE 33 4 7 6 4 3 8 6 5 9 1 6 5 4 4 4 9 11 0 1 0
------- 11.0 6.9 10.9 13.0 16.0 8.6 13.1 12.5 6.8 19.1 4.2 11.8 11.1 4.7 10.0 9.3 12.2 25.0 10.0

NEVER HEARD OF 33 4 7 6 4 3 8 6 5 9 1 6 5 4 4 4 9 11 0 1 0
11.0 6.9 10.9 13.0 16.0 8.6 13.1 12.5 6.8 19.1 4.2 11.8 11.1 4.7 10.0 9.3 12.2 25.0 10.0

UNSURE 7 1 1 3 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 2 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
2.3 1.7 1.6 6.5 3.3 2.7 4.3 4.2 3.9 1.2 7.5 4.1

REFUSED 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
1.0 3.4 1.6 2.1 2.7 2.3 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q8. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

STEVEN CHOI

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 257 159 28 70 17 76 51 80 33 18 23 42 25 36 29 11 20 53
----- 85.7 83.7 93.3 87.5 89.5 79.2 81.0 94.1 89.2 75.0 85.2 84.0 92.6 97.3 82.9 68.8 87.0 86.9

FAVORABLE [NET] 110 63 15 32 7 33 20 37 13 8 8 20 13 16 15 4 6 20
--------------- 36.7 33.2 50.0 40.0 36.8 34.4 31.7 43.5 35.1 33.3 29.6 40.0 48.1 43.2 42.9 25.0 26.1 32.8

VERY FAVORABLE 45 25 7 13 2 13 6 15 9 3 6 7 4 8 6 1 1 9
15.0 13.2 23.3 16.3 10.5 13.5 9.5 17.6 24.3 12.5 22.2 14.0 14.8 21.6 17.1 6.3 4.3 14.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 65 38 8 19 5 20 14 22 4 5 2 13 9 8 9 3 5 11
21.7 20.0 26.7 23.8 26.3 20.8 22.2 25.9 10.8 20.8 7.4 26.0 33.3 21.6 25.7 18.8 21.7 18.0

NO OPINION 43 23 3 17 4 22 4 10 3 3 6 7 3 5 3 3 4 9
14.3 12.1 10.0 21.3 21.1 22.9 6.3 11.8 8.1 12.5 22.2 14.0 11.1 13.5 8.6 18.8 17.4 14.8

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 104 73 10 21 6 21 27 33 17 7 9 15 9 15 11 4 10 24
----------------- 34.7 38.4 33.3 26.3 31.6 21.9 42.9 38.8 45.9 29.2 33.3 30.0 33.3 40.5 31.4 25.0 43.5 39.3

VERY UNFAVORABLE 67 47 10 10 4 12 16 24 11 5 6 10 6 9 10 3 5 13
22.3 24.7 33.3 12.5 21.1 12.5 25.4 28.2 29.7 20.8 22.2 20.0 22.2 24.3 28.6 18.8 21.7 21.3

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 37 26 0 11 2 9 11 9 6 2 3 5 3 6 1 1 5 11
12.3 13.7 13.8 10.5 9.4 17.5 10.6 16.2 8.3 11.1 10.0 11.1 16.2 2.9 6.3 21.7 18.0

UNAWARE 33 24 2 7 2 16 11 3 1 5 4 7 2 1 3 4 1 6
------- 11.0 12.6 6.7 8.8 10.5 16.7 17.5 3.5 2.7 20.8 14.8 14.0 7.4 2.7 8.6 25.0 4.3 9.8

NEVER HEARD OF 33 24 2 7 2 16 11 3 1 5 4 7 2 1 3 4 1 6
11.0 12.6 6.7 8.8 10.5 16.7 17.5 3.5 2.7 20.8 14.8 14.0 7.4 2.7 8.6 25.0 4.3 9.8

UNSURE 7 5 0 2 0 3 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1
2.3 2.6 2.5 3.1 1.6 2.4 2.7 4.2 5.7 6.3 8.7 1.6

REFUSED 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 5.4 2.0 2.9 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q8. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

STEVEN CHOI

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 257 98 29 76 54 44 65 63 76 85 87 15 172 5 30 26 9 1 256 0 140 117
----- 85.7 92.5 80.6 90.5 73.0 84.6 91.5 88.7 86.4 88.5 81.3 88.2 86.4 100.0 83.3 76.5 100.0 100.0 85.6 80.5 92.9

FAVORABLE [NET] 110 87 4 11 8 22 44 51 13 22 33 6 71 3 13 14 3 0 110 0 62 48
--------------- 36.7 82.1 11.1 13.1 10.8 42.3 62.0 71.8 14.8 22.9 30.8 35.3 35.7 60.0 36.1 41.2 33.3 36.8 35.6 38.1

VERY FAVORABLE 45 43 1 0 1 5 22 26 1 3 16 2 30 0 3 10 0 0 45 0 20 25
15.0 40.6 2.8 1.4 9.6 31.0 36.6 1.1 3.1 15.0 11.8 15.1 8.3 29.4 15.1 11.5 19.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 65 44 3 11 7 17 22 25 12 19 17 4 41 3 10 4 3 0 65 0 42 23
21.7 41.5 8.3 13.1 9.5 32.7 31.0 35.2 13.6 19.8 15.9 23.5 20.6 60.0 27.8 11.8 33.3 21.7 24.1 18.3

NO OPINION 43 9 4 4 26 5 5 2 10 9 27 3 24 0 7 5 4 0 43 0 30 13
14.3 8.5 11.1 4.8 35.1 9.6 7.0 2.8 11.4 9.4 25.2 17.6 12.1 19.4 14.7 44.4 14.4 17.2 10.3

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 104 2 21 61 20 17 16 10 53 54 27 6 77 2 10 7 2 1 103 0 48 56
----------------- 34.7 1.9 58.3 72.6 27.0 32.7 22.5 14.1 60.2 56.3 25.2 35.3 38.7 40.0 27.8 20.6 22.2 100.0 34.4 27.6 44.4

VERY UNFAVORABLE 67 0 11 44 12 10 6 4 39 39 16 5 49 2 4 5 2 1 66 0 30 37
22.3 30.6 52.4 16.2 19.2 8.5 5.6 44.3 40.6 15.0 29.4 24.6 40.0 11.1 14.7 22.2 100.0 22.1 17.2 29.4

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 37 2 10 17 8 7 10 6 14 15 11 1 28 0 6 2 0 0 37 0 18 19
12.3 1.9 27.8 20.2 10.8 13.5 14.1 8.5 15.9 15.6 10.3 5.9 14.1 16.7 5.9 12.4 10.3 15.1

UNAWARE 33 5 7 5 16 6 4 5 7 10 17 2 18 0 5 8 0 0 33 0 27 6
------- 11.0 4.7 19.4 6.0 21.6 11.5 5.6 7.0 8.0 10.4 15.9 11.8 9.0 13.9 23.5 11.0 15.5 4.8

NEVER HEARD OF 33 5 7 5 16 6 4 5 7 10 17 2 18 0 5 8 0 0 33 0 27 6
11.0 4.7 19.4 6.0 21.6 11.5 5.6 7.0 8.0 10.4 15.9 11.8 9.0 13.9 23.5 11.0 15.5 4.8

UNSURE 7 2 0 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 2 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 5 2
2.3 1.9 2.4 4.1 1.9 2.8 2.8 3.4 1.0 1.9 3.0 2.8 2.3 2.9 1.6

REFUSED 3 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.4 2.3 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.1 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q9. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

KATHRYN DAIGLE

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 140 69 71 63 45 25 57 36 47 107 33 0 16 50 34 40 40 29 26 45
----- 46.7 47.6 45.8 51.6 46.9 35.2 54.8 46.2 39.8 47.6 44.6 31.4 47.6 50.7 51.9 47.1 48.3 36.6 53.6

FAVORABLE [NET] 21 9 12 10 6 5 8 3 10 18 3 0 1 6 7 7 4 5 3 9
--------------- 7.0 6.2 7.7 8.2 6.3 7.0 7.7 3.8 8.5 8.0 4.1 2.0 5.7 10.4 9.1 4.7 8.3 4.2 10.7

VERY FAVORABLE 7 2 5 5 1 1 5 0 2 6 1 0 0 1 2 4 0 2 1 4
2.3 1.4 3.2 4.1 1.0 1.4 4.8 1.7 2.7 1.4 1.0 3.0 5.2 3.3 1.4 4.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 14 7 7 5 5 4 3 3 8 12 2 0 1 5 5 3 4 3 2 5
4.7 4.8 4.5 4.1 5.2 5.6 2.9 3.8 6.8 5.3 2.7 2.0 4.8 7.5 3.9 4.7 5.0 2.8 6.0

NO OPINION 84 39 45 33 30 14 30 25 29 64 20 0 10 31 24 19 22 17 19 26
28.0 26.9 29.0 27.0 31.3 19.7 28.8 32.1 24.6 28.4 27.0 19.6 29.5 35.8 24.7 25.9 28.3 26.8 31.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 21 14 20 9 6 19 8 8 25 10 0 5 13 3 14 14 7 4 10
----------------- 11.7 14.5 9.0 16.4 9.4 8.5 18.3 10.3 6.8 11.1 13.5 9.8 12.4 4.5 18.2 16.5 11.7 5.6 11.9

VERY UNFAVORABLE 13 8 5 7 4 2 6 4 3 7 6 0 3 7 0 3 7 1 3 2
4.3 5.5 3.2 5.7 4.2 2.8 5.8 5.1 2.5 3.1 8.1 5.9 6.7 3.9 8.2 1.7 4.2 2.4

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 22 13 9 13 5 4 13 4 5 18 4 0 2 6 3 11 7 6 1 8
7.3 9.0 5.8 10.7 5.2 5.6 12.5 5.1 4.2 8.0 5.4 3.9 5.7 4.5 14.3 8.2 10.0 1.4 9.5

UNAWARE 148 71 77 54 47 43 42 38 68 108 39 1 34 48 33 33 41 30 41 36
------- 49.3 49.0 49.7 44.3 49.0 60.6 40.4 48.7 57.6 48.0 52.7 100.0 66.7 45.7 49.3 42.9 48.2 50.0 57.7 42.9

NEVER HEARD OF 148 71 77 54 47 43 42 38 68 108 39 1 34 48 33 33 41 30 41 36
49.3 49.0 49.7 44.3 49.0 60.6 40.4 48.7 57.6 48.0 52.7 100.0 66.7 45.7 49.3 42.9 48.2 50.0 57.7 42.9

UNSURE 10 5 5 4 3 3 4 3 3 9 1 0 1 6 0 3 4 1 3 2
3.3 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.1 4.2 3.8 3.8 2.5 4.0 1.4 2.0 5.7 3.9 4.7 1.7 4.2 2.4

REFUSED 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
0.7 1.3 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q9. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

KATHRYN DAIGLE

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 140 28 35 15 10 23 22 22 41 13 12 25 20 47 24 20 30 15 1 3 0
----- 46.7 48.3 54.7 32.6 40.0 65.7 36.1 45.8 55.4 27.7 50.0 49.0 44.4 54.7 60.0 46.5 40.5 34.1 33.3 30.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 21 4 6 2 3 3 3 3 7 2 3 2 4 5 3 7 4 2 0 0 0
--------------- 7.0 6.9 9.4 4.3 12.0 8.6 4.9 6.3 9.5 4.3 12.5 3.9 8.9 5.8 7.5 16.3 5.4 4.5

VERY FAVORABLE 7 2 3 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 0
2.3 3.4 4.7 4.0 1.6 6.8 4.2 2.0 1.2 5.0 4.7 4.5

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 14 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 4 4 1 5 4 0 0 0 0
4.7 3.4 4.7 4.3 8.0 8.6 3.3 6.3 2.7 4.3 8.3 2.0 8.9 4.7 2.5 11.6 5.4

NO OPINION 84 14 19 7 7 15 15 12 21 6 8 17 13 27 13 10 22 8 1 3 0
28.0 24.1 29.7 15.2 28.0 42.9 24.6 25.0 28.4 12.8 33.3 33.3 28.9 31.4 32.5 23.3 29.7 18.2 33.3 30.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 10 10 6 0 5 4 7 13 5 1 6 3 15 8 3 4 5 0 0 0
----------------- 11.7 17.2 15.6 13.0 14.3 6.6 14.6 17.6 10.6 4.2 11.8 6.7 17.4 20.0 7.0 5.4 11.4

VERY UNFAVORABLE 13 4 3 2 0 2 2 4 3 2 0 4 0 6 1 0 3 3 0 0 0
4.3 6.9 4.7 4.3 5.7 3.3 8.3 4.1 4.3 7.8 7.0 2.5 4.1 6.8

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 22 6 7 4 0 3 2 3 10 3 1 2 3 9 7 3 1 2 0 0 0
7.3 10.3 10.9 8.7 8.6 3.3 6.3 13.5 6.4 4.2 3.9 6.7 10.5 17.5 7.0 1.4 4.5

UNAWARE 148 28 26 28 15 12 35 23 31 31 12 24 23 36 15 19 42 28 2 6 0
------- 49.3 48.3 40.6 60.9 60.0 34.3 57.4 47.9 41.9 66.0 50.0 47.1 51.1 41.9 37.5 44.2 56.8 63.6 66.7 60.0

NEVER HEARD OF 148 28 26 28 15 12 35 23 31 31 12 24 23 36 15 19 42 28 2 6 0
49.3 48.3 40.6 60.9 60.0 34.3 57.4 47.9 41.9 66.0 50.0 47.1 51.1 41.9 37.5 44.2 56.8 63.6 66.7 60.0

UNSURE 10 2 2 3 0 0 3 2 2 3 0 2 1 2 1 4 2 0 0 1 0
3.3 3.4 3.1 6.5 4.9 4.2 2.7 6.4 3.9 2.2 2.3 2.5 9.3 2.7 10.0

REFUSED 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.2 1.2 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q9. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

KATHRYN DAIGLE

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 140 87 15 38 5 45 33 38 19 9 12 18 13 22 20 1 16 29
----- 46.7 45.8 50.0 47.5 26.3 46.9 52.4 44.7 51.4 37.5 44.4 36.0 48.1 59.5 57.1 6.3 69.6 47.5

FAVORABLE [NET] 21 11 4 6 0 8 4 6 3 1 0 3 3 4 4 0 2 4
--------------- 7.0 5.8 13.3 7.5 8.3 6.3 7.1 8.1 4.2 6.0 11.1 10.8 11.4 8.7 6.6

VERY FAVORABLE 7 4 1 2 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 2
2.3 2.1 3.3 2.5 3.1 3.2 2.4 2.7 8.6 4.3 3.3

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 14 7 3 4 0 5 2 4 3 1 0 3 3 3 1 0 1 2
4.7 3.7 10.0 5.0 5.2 3.2 4.7 8.1 4.2 6.0 11.1 8.1 2.9 4.3 3.3

NO OPINION 84 48 10 26 4 23 20 26 11 6 8 14 5 13 7 1 10 20
28.0 25.3 33.3 32.5 21.1 24.0 31.7 30.6 29.7 25.0 29.6 28.0 18.5 35.1 20.0 6.3 43.5 32.8

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 28 1 6 1 14 9 6 5 2 4 1 5 5 9 0 4 5
----------------- 11.7 14.7 3.3 7.5 5.3 14.6 14.3 7.1 13.5 8.3 14.8 2.0 18.5 13.5 25.7 17.4 8.2

VERY UNFAVORABLE 13 11 1 1 0 7 4 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 1 1
4.3 5.8 3.3 1.3 7.3 6.3 2.4 8.3 7.4 7.4 5.4 8.6 4.3 1.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 22 17 0 5 1 7 5 4 5 0 2 1 3 3 6 0 3 4
7.3 8.9 6.3 5.3 7.3 7.9 4.7 13.5 7.4 2.0 11.1 8.1 17.1 13.0 6.6

UNAWARE 148 96 13 39 13 48 27 43 17 15 12 31 13 15 12 15 5 30
------- 49.3 50.5 43.3 48.8 68.4 50.0 42.9 50.6 45.9 62.5 44.4 62.0 48.1 40.5 34.3 93.8 21.7 49.2

NEVER HEARD OF 148 96 13 39 13 48 27 43 17 15 12 31 13 15 12 15 5 30
49.3 50.5 43.3 48.8 68.4 50.0 42.9 50.6 45.9 62.5 44.4 62.0 48.1 40.5 34.3 93.8 21.7 49.2

UNSURE 10 6 1 3 0 3 2 4 1 0 2 1 1 0 3 0 1 2
3.3 3.2 3.3 3.8 3.1 3.2 4.7 2.7 7.4 2.0 3.7 8.6 4.3 3.3

REFUSED 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.7 0.5 3.3 5.3 1.6 3.7 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q9. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

KATHRYN DAIGLE

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 140 51 18 42 29 24 38 36 42 47 44 10 95 3 14 15 3 1 139 0 72 68
----- 46.7 48.1 50.0 50.0 39.2 46.2 53.5 50.7 47.7 49.0 41.1 58.8 47.7 60.0 38.9 44.1 33.3 100.0 46.5 41.4 54.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 21 7 5 7 2 7 7 4 9 7 4 2 15 1 1 2 0 0 21 0 8 13
--------------- 7.0 6.6 13.9 8.3 2.7 13.5 9.9 5.6 10.2 7.3 3.7 11.8 7.5 20.0 2.8 5.9 7.0 4.6 10.3

VERY FAVORABLE 7 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 3 3 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 2 5
2.3 0.9 8.3 3.6 5.8 4.2 2.8 3.4 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.3 1.1 4.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 14 6 2 4 2 4 4 2 6 4 4 2 9 1 1 1 0 0 14 0 6 8
4.7 5.7 5.6 4.8 2.7 7.7 5.6 2.8 6.8 4.2 3.7 11.8 4.5 20.0 2.8 2.9 4.7 3.4 6.3

NO OPINION 84 29 10 24 21 12 19 19 26 26 31 5 59 1 9 8 2 1 83 0 45 39
28.0 27.4 27.8 28.6 28.4 23.1 26.8 26.8 29.5 27.1 29.0 29.4 29.6 20.0 25.0 23.5 22.2 100.0 27.8 25.9 31.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 15 3 11 6 5 12 13 7 14 9 3 21 1 4 5 1 0 35 0 19 16
----------------- 11.7 14.2 8.3 13.1 8.1 9.6 16.9 18.3 8.0 14.6 8.4 17.6 10.6 20.0 11.1 14.7 11.1 11.7 10.9 12.7

VERY UNFAVORABLE 13 6 1 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 6 3 5 1 1 2 1 0 13 0 10 3
4.3 5.7 2.8 3.6 4.1 1.9 5.6 4.2 2.3 3.1 5.6 17.6 2.5 20.0 2.8 5.9 11.1 4.3 5.7 2.4

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 22 9 2 8 3 4 8 10 5 11 3 0 16 0 3 3 0 0 22 0 9 13
7.3 8.5 5.6 9.5 4.1 7.7 11.3 14.1 5.7 11.5 2.8 8.0 8.3 8.8 7.4 5.2 10.3

UNAWARE 148 53 17 37 41 24 29 33 42 45 61 7 96 2 20 19 4 0 148 0 95 53
------- 49.3 50.0 47.2 44.0 55.4 46.2 40.8 46.5 47.7 46.9 57.0 41.2 48.2 40.0 55.6 55.9 44.4 49.5 54.6 42.1

NEVER HEARD OF 148 53 17 37 41 24 29 33 42 45 61 7 96 2 20 19 4 0 148 0 95 53
49.3 50.0 47.2 44.0 55.4 46.2 40.8 46.5 47.7 46.9 57.0 41.2 48.2 40.0 55.6 55.9 44.4 49.5 54.6 42.1

UNSURE 10 2 1 4 3 4 4 2 3 3 1 0 7 0 2 0 1 0 10 0 6 4
3.3 1.9 2.8 4.8 4.1 7.7 5.6 2.8 3.4 3.1 0.9 3.5 5.6 11.1 3.3 3.4 3.2

REFUSED 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.5 11.1 0.7 0.6 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q10. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

JEFFREY LALLOWAY

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 168 75 93 79 55 27 67 44 57 131 37 0 13 59 42 54 37 38 35 58
----- 56.0 51.7 60.0 64.8 57.3 38.0 64.4 56.4 48.3 58.2 50.0 25.5 56.2 62.7 70.1 43.5 63.3 49.3 69.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 33 31 48 9 6 41 5 18 54 10 0 2 23 13 26 16 17 9 22
--------------- 21.3 22.8 20.0 39.3 9.4 8.5 39.4 6.4 15.3 24.0 13.5 3.9 21.9 19.4 33.8 18.8 28.3 12.7 26.2

VERY FAVORABLE 24 16 8 20 3 1 19 2 3 22 2 0 1 5 3 15 6 10 0 8
8.0 11.0 5.2 16.4 3.1 1.4 18.3 2.6 2.5 9.8 2.7 2.0 4.8 4.5 19.5 7.1 16.7 9.5

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 40 17 23 28 6 5 22 3 15 32 8 0 1 18 10 11 10 7 9 14
13.3 11.7 14.8 23.0 6.3 7.0 21.2 3.8 12.7 14.2 10.8 2.0 17.1 14.9 14.3 11.8 11.7 12.7 16.7

NO OPINION 49 20 29 17 18 10 14 16 19 33 16 0 9 16 17 7 12 8 13 16
16.3 13.8 18.7 13.9 18.8 14.1 13.5 20.5 16.1 14.7 21.6 17.6 15.2 25.4 9.1 14.1 13.3 18.3 19.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 55 22 33 14 28 11 12 23 20 44 11 0 2 20 12 21 9 13 13 20
----------------- 18.3 15.2 21.3 11.5 29.2 15.5 11.5 29.5 16.9 19.6 14.9 3.9 19.0 17.9 27.3 10.6 21.7 18.3 23.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 32 9 23 6 19 6 6 16 10 25 7 0 0 14 4 14 5 4 9 14
10.7 6.2 14.8 4.9 19.8 8.5 5.8 20.5 8.5 11.1 9.5 13.3 6.0 18.2 5.9 6.7 12.7 16.7

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 13 10 8 9 5 6 7 10 19 4 0 2 6 8 7 4 9 4 6
7.7 9.0 6.5 6.6 9.4 7.0 5.8 9.0 8.5 8.4 5.4 3.9 5.7 11.9 9.1 4.7 15.0 5.6 7.1

UNAWARE 120 62 58 38 38 40 33 31 56 85 34 1 34 41 24 21 42 20 33 25
------- 40.0 42.8 37.4 31.1 39.6 56.3 31.7 39.7 47.5 37.8 45.9 100.0 66.7 39.0 35.8 27.3 49.4 33.3 46.5 29.8

NEVER HEARD OF 120 62 58 38 38 40 33 31 56 85 34 1 34 41 24 21 42 20 33 25
40.0 42.8 37.4 31.1 39.6 56.3 31.7 39.7 47.5 37.8 45.9 100.0 66.7 39.0 35.8 27.3 49.4 33.3 46.5 29.8

UNSURE 10 8 2 3 3 4 2 3 5 8 2 0 4 4 1 1 6 2 2 0
3.3 5.5 1.3 2.5 3.1 5.6 1.9 3.8 4.2 3.6 2.7 7.8 3.8 1.5 1.3 7.1 3.3 2.8

REFUSED 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
0.7 1.3 1.6 1.9 0.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q10. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

JEFFREY LALLOWAY

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 168 35 44 14 13 23 32 27 52 15 12 24 31 63 26 22 34 17 0 6 0
----- 56.0 60.3 68.8 30.4 52.0 65.7 52.5 56.3 70.3 31.9 50.0 47.1 68.9 73.3 65.0 51.2 45.9 38.6 60.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 25 23 3 3 5 4 15 33 3 3 6 3 29 9 10 9 5 0 2 0
--------------- 21.3 43.1 35.9 6.5 12.0 14.3 6.6 31.3 44.6 6.4 12.5 11.8 6.7 33.7 22.5 23.3 12.2 11.4 20.0

VERY FAVORABLE 24 12 8 1 0 3 0 5 15 0 1 1 2 15 2 4 1 2 0 0 0
8.0 20.7 12.5 2.2 8.6 10.4 20.3 4.2 2.0 4.4 17.4 5.0 9.3 1.4 4.5

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 40 13 15 2 3 2 4 10 18 3 2 5 1 14 7 6 8 3 0 2 0
13.3 22.4 23.4 4.3 12.0 5.7 6.6 20.8 24.3 6.4 8.3 9.8 2.2 16.3 17.5 14.0 10.8 6.8 20.0

NO OPINION 49 5 12 4 6 9 9 7 10 5 5 10 8 7 8 5 19 6 0 4 0
16.3 8.6 18.8 8.7 24.0 25.7 14.8 14.6 13.5 10.6 20.8 19.6 17.8 8.1 20.0 11.6 25.7 13.6 40.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 55 5 9 7 4 9 19 5 9 7 4 8 20 27 9 7 6 6 0 0 0
----------------- 18.3 8.6 14.1 15.2 16.0 25.7 31.1 10.4 12.2 14.9 16.7 15.7 44.4 31.4 22.5 16.3 8.1 13.6

VERY UNFAVORABLE 32 0 6 3 3 5 14 2 4 5 1 6 13 13 5 6 4 4 0 0 0
10.7 9.4 6.5 12.0 14.3 23.0 4.2 5.4 10.6 4.2 11.8 28.9 15.1 12.5 14.0 5.4 9.1

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 5 3 4 1 4 5 3 5 2 3 2 7 14 4 1 2 2 0 0 0
7.7 8.6 4.7 8.7 4.0 11.4 8.2 6.3 6.8 4.3 12.5 3.9 15.6 16.3 10.0 2.3 2.7 4.5

UNAWARE 120 20 18 28 12 11 27 19 19 28 12 24 14 22 12 19 36 25 3 3 0
------- 40.0 34.5 28.1 60.9 48.0 31.4 44.3 39.6 25.7 59.6 50.0 47.1 31.1 25.6 30.0 44.2 48.6 56.8 100.0 30.0

NEVER HEARD OF 120 20 18 28 12 11 27 19 19 28 12 24 14 22 12 19 36 25 3 3 0
40.0 34.5 28.1 60.9 48.0 31.4 44.3 39.6 25.7 59.6 50.0 47.1 31.1 25.6 30.0 44.2 48.6 56.8 100.0 30.0

UNSURE 10 3 0 4 0 1 2 1 2 4 0 3 0 0 2 2 4 1 0 1 0
3.3 5.2 8.7 2.9 3.3 2.1 2.7 8.5 5.9 5.0 4.7 5.4 2.3 10.0

REFUSED 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 3.1 2.1 1.4 1.2 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q10. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

JEFFREY LALLOWAY

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 168 109 22 37 9 44 33 53 29 13 16 25 18 26 20 2 11 37
----- 56.0 57.4 73.3 46.3 47.4 45.8 52.4 62.4 78.4 54.2 59.3 50.0 66.7 70.3 57.1 12.5 47.8 60.7

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 38 10 16 3 15 9 24 13 5 6 7 7 10 9 0 4 16
--------------- 21.3 20.0 33.3 20.0 15.8 15.6 14.3 28.2 35.1 20.8 22.2 14.0 25.9 27.0 25.7 17.4 26.2

VERY FAVORABLE 24 17 3 4 2 2 4 7 9 3 4 2 2 3 3 0 1 6
8.0 8.9 10.0 5.0 10.5 2.1 6.3 8.2 24.3 12.5 14.8 4.0 7.4 8.1 8.6 4.3 9.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 40 21 7 12 1 13 5 17 4 2 2 5 5 7 6 0 3 10
13.3 11.1 23.3 15.0 5.3 13.5 7.9 20.0 10.8 8.3 7.4 10.0 18.5 18.9 17.1 13.0 16.4

NO OPINION 49 30 2 17 5 16 12 12 4 2 6 11 6 6 2 1 3 12
16.3 15.8 6.7 21.3 26.3 16.7 19.0 14.1 10.8 8.3 22.2 22.0 22.2 16.2 5.7 6.3 13.0 19.7

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 55 41 10 4 1 13 12 17 12 6 4 7 5 10 9 1 4 9
----------------- 18.3 21.6 33.3 5.0 5.3 13.5 19.0 20.0 32.4 25.0 14.8 14.0 18.5 27.0 25.7 6.3 17.4 14.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 32 23 6 3 1 9 5 11 6 2 2 5 2 6 8 0 3 4
10.7 12.1 20.0 3.8 5.3 9.4 7.9 12.9 16.2 8.3 7.4 10.0 7.4 16.2 22.9 13.0 6.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 18 4 1 0 4 7 6 6 4 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 5
7.7 9.5 13.3 1.3 4.2 11.1 7.1 16.2 16.7 7.4 4.0 11.1 10.8 2.9 6.3 4.3 8.2

UNAWARE 120 73 8 39 9 45 29 31 6 10 10 24 9 10 12 13 8 24
------- 40.0 38.4 26.7 48.8 47.4 46.9 46.0 36.5 16.2 41.7 37.0 48.0 33.3 27.0 34.3 81.3 34.8 39.3

NEVER HEARD OF 120 73 8 39 9 45 29 31 6 10 10 24 9 10 12 13 8 24
40.0 38.4 26.7 48.8 47.4 46.9 46.0 36.5 16.2 41.7 37.0 48.0 33.3 27.0 34.3 81.3 34.8 39.3

UNSURE 10 6 0 4 0 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 3 0
3.3 3.2 5.0 7.3 1.6 1.2 2.7 4.2 3.7 2.0 2.7 5.7 6.3 13.0

REFUSED 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.7 1.1 5.3 2.7 2.9 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q10. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

JEFFREY LALLOWAY

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 168 60 17 62 29 33 46 55 58 59 39 9 120 1 19 14 5 0 168 0 87 81
----- 56.0 56.6 47.2 73.8 39.2 63.5 64.8 77.5 65.9 61.5 36.4 52.9 60.3 20.0 52.8 41.2 55.6 56.2 50.0 64.3

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 47 5 10 2 15 35 47 9 8 6 4 52 0 4 3 1 0 64 0 29 35
--------------- 21.3 44.3 13.9 11.9 2.7 28.8 49.3 66.2 10.2 8.3 5.6 23.5 26.1 11.1 8.8 11.1 21.4 16.7 27.8

VERY FAVORABLE 24 21 1 1 1 3 17 21 0 0 3 2 21 0 0 1 0 0 24 0 8 16
8.0 19.8 2.8 1.2 1.4 5.8 23.9 29.6 2.8 11.8 10.6 2.9 8.0 4.6 12.7

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 40 26 4 9 1 12 18 26 9 8 3 2 31 0 4 2 1 0 40 0 21 19
13.3 24.5 11.1 10.7 1.4 23.1 25.4 36.6 10.2 8.3 2.8 11.8 15.6 11.1 5.9 11.1 13.4 12.1 15.1

NO OPINION 49 10 6 14 19 10 8 6 13 12 24 2 28 0 9 8 2 0 49 0 34 15
16.3 9.4 16.7 16.7 25.7 19.2 11.3 8.5 14.8 12.5 22.4 11.8 14.1 25.0 23.5 22.2 16.4 19.5 11.9

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 55 3 6 38 8 8 3 2 36 39 9 3 40 1 6 3 2 0 55 0 24 31
----------------- 18.3 2.8 16.7 45.2 10.8 15.4 4.2 2.8 40.9 40.6 8.4 17.6 20.1 20.0 16.7 8.8 22.2 18.4 13.8 24.6

VERY UNFAVORABLE 32 0 3 25 4 5 2 0 22 23 4 2 24 1 3 0 2 0 32 0 15 17
10.7 8.3 29.8 5.4 9.6 2.8 25.0 24.0 3.7 11.8 12.1 20.0 8.3 22.2 10.7 8.6 13.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 3 3 13 4 3 1 2 14 16 5 1 16 0 3 3 0 0 23 0 9 14
7.7 2.8 8.3 15.5 5.4 5.8 1.4 2.8 15.9 16.7 4.7 5.9 8.0 8.3 8.8 7.7 5.2 11.1

UNAWARE 120 43 18 18 41 15 22 14 27 34 64 7 71 4 15 20 3 1 119 0 78 42
------- 40.0 40.6 50.0 21.4 55.4 28.8 31.0 19.7 30.7 35.4 59.8 41.2 35.7 80.0 41.7 58.8 33.3 100.0 39.8 44.8 33.3

NEVER HEARD OF 120 43 18 18 41 15 22 14 27 34 64 7 71 4 15 20 3 1 119 0 78 42
40.0 40.6 50.0 21.4 55.4 28.8 31.0 19.7 30.7 35.4 59.8 41.2 35.7 80.0 41.7 58.8 33.3 100.0 39.8 44.8 33.3

UNSURE 10 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 7 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 7 3
3.3 2.8 2.8 3.6 4.1 5.8 4.2 2.8 2.3 3.1 2.8 5.9 3.5 5.6 3.3 4.0 2.4

REFUSED 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0
0.7 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.1 0.9 0.5 11.1 0.7 1.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q11. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LARRY AGRAN

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 238 107 131 106 79 47 90 65 83 187 50 1 22 90 57 69 58 49 54 77
----- 79.3 73.8 84.5 86.9 82.3 66.2 86.5 83.3 70.3 83.1 67.6 100.0 43.1 85.7 85.1 89.6 68.2 81.7 76.1 91.7

FAVORABLE [NET] 92 43 49 27 47 16 22 41 29 76 16 0 8 28 25 31 19 24 17 32
--------------- 30.7 29.7 31.6 22.1 49.0 22.5 21.2 52.6 24.6 33.8 21.6 15.7 26.7 37.3 40.3 22.4 40.0 23.9 38.1

VERY FAVORABLE 53 23 30 16 28 8 13 24 16 42 11 0 4 11 13 25 8 15 7 23
17.7 15.9 19.4 13.1 29.2 11.3 12.5 30.8 13.6 18.7 14.9 7.8 10.5 19.4 32.5 9.4 25.0 9.9 27.4

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 39 20 19 11 19 8 9 17 13 34 5 0 4 17 12 6 11 9 10 9
13.0 13.8 12.3 9.0 19.8 11.3 8.7 21.8 11.0 15.1 6.8 7.8 16.2 17.9 7.8 12.9 15.0 14.1 10.7

NO OPINION 32 10 22 11 10 9 9 7 16 23 9 0 7 14 6 5 8 2 13 9
10.7 6.9 14.2 9.0 10.4 12.7 8.7 9.0 13.6 10.2 12.2 13.7 13.3 9.0 6.5 9.4 3.3 18.3 10.7

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 114 54 60 68 22 22 59 17 38 88 25 1 7 48 26 33 31 23 24 36
----------------- 38.0 37.2 38.7 55.7 22.9 31.0 56.7 21.8 32.2 39.1 33.8 100.0 13.7 45.7 38.8 42.9 36.5 38.3 33.8 42.9

VERY UNFAVORABLE 81 42 39 54 13 13 48 10 23 63 18 0 5 30 17 29 23 19 12 27
27.0 29.0 25.2 44.3 13.5 18.3 46.2 12.8 19.5 28.0 24.3 9.8 28.6 25.4 37.7 27.1 31.7 16.9 32.1

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 33 12 21 14 9 9 11 7 15 25 7 1 2 18 9 4 8 4 12 9
11.0 8.3 13.5 11.5 9.4 12.7 10.6 9.0 12.7 11.1 9.5 100.0 3.9 17.1 13.4 5.2 9.4 6.7 16.9 10.7

UNAWARE 56 35 21 12 16 23 11 12 33 35 21 0 29 13 8 6 26 9 16 5
------- 18.7 24.1 13.5 9.8 16.7 32.4 10.6 15.4 28.0 15.6 28.4 56.9 12.4 11.9 7.8 30.6 15.0 22.5 6.0

NEVER HEARD OF 56 35 21 12 16 23 11 12 33 35 21 0 29 13 8 6 26 9 16 5
18.7 24.1 13.5 9.8 16.7 32.4 10.6 15.4 28.0 15.6 28.4 56.9 12.4 11.9 7.8 30.6 15.0 22.5 6.0

UNSURE 3 3 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0
1.0 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.7 0.4 2.7 1.0 3.0 1.2 3.3

REFUSED 3 0 3 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2
1.0 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q11. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LARRY AGRAN

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 238 49 57 26 21 30 49 37 69 29 18 41 38 83 32 35 54 23 2 9 0
----- 79.3 84.5 89.1 56.5 84.0 85.7 80.3 77.1 93.2 61.7 75.0 80.4 84.4 96.5 80.0 81.4 73.0 52.3 66.7 90.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 92 15 12 7 9 20 27 7 20 7 9 20 27 35 12 12 20 9 1 3 0
--------------- 30.7 25.9 18.8 15.2 36.0 57.1 44.3 14.6 27.0 14.9 37.5 39.2 60.0 40.7 30.0 27.9 27.0 20.5 33.3 30.0

VERY FAVORABLE 53 8 8 2 6 13 15 3 13 4 4 7 21 25 6 7 8 4 1 2 0
17.7 13.8 12.5 4.3 24.0 37.1 24.6 6.3 17.6 8.5 16.7 13.7 46.7 29.1 15.0 16.3 10.8 9.1 33.3 20.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 39 7 4 5 3 7 12 4 7 3 5 13 6 10 6 5 12 5 0 1 0
13.0 12.1 6.3 10.9 12.0 20.0 19.7 8.3 9.5 6.4 20.8 25.5 13.3 11.6 15.0 11.6 16.2 11.4 10.0

NO OPINION 32 4 7 4 5 1 9 6 5 7 2 6 4 3 6 3 11 5 1 3 0
10.7 6.9 10.9 8.7 20.0 2.9 14.8 12.5 6.8 14.9 8.3 11.8 8.9 3.5 15.0 7.0 14.9 11.4 33.3 30.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 114 30 38 15 7 9 13 24 44 15 7 15 7 45 14 20 23 9 0 3 0
----------------- 38.0 51.7 59.4 32.6 28.0 25.7 21.3 50.0 59.5 31.9 29.2 29.4 15.6 52.3 35.0 46.5 31.1 20.5 30.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 81 25 29 10 3 7 6 18 36 10 3 6 7 35 11 15 13 6 0 1 0
27.0 43.1 45.3 21.7 12.0 20.0 9.8 37.5 48.6 21.3 12.5 11.8 15.6 40.7 27.5 34.9 17.6 13.6 10.0

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 33 5 9 5 4 2 7 6 8 5 4 9 0 10 3 5 10 3 0 2 0
11.0 8.6 14.1 10.9 16.0 5.7 11.5 12.5 10.8 10.6 16.7 17.6 11.6 7.5 11.6 13.5 6.8 20.0

UNAWARE 56 7 5 19 4 5 11 10 2 17 6 10 6 2 6 8 18 20 1 1 0
------- 18.7 12.1 7.8 41.3 16.0 14.3 18.0 20.8 2.7 36.2 25.0 19.6 13.3 2.3 15.0 18.6 24.3 45.5 33.3 10.0

NEVER HEARD OF 56 7 5 19 4 5 11 10 2 17 6 10 6 2 6 8 18 20 1 1 0
18.7 12.1 7.8 41.3 16.0 14.3 18.0 20.8 2.7 36.2 25.0 19.6 13.3 2.3 15.0 18.6 24.3 45.5 33.3 10.0

UNSURE 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0
1.0 3.4 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.5 2.7

REFUSED 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
1.0 3.1 1.6 2.1 1.4 2.2 1.2 2.5 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q11. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LARRY AGRAN

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 238 153 25 60 12 62 49 80 35 16 23 43 23 31 28 9 18 47
----- 79.3 80.5 83.3 75.0 63.2 64.6 77.8 94.1 94.6 66.7 85.2 86.0 85.2 83.8 80.0 56.3 78.3 77.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 92 58 10 24 2 22 22 28 18 6 9 17 10 13 10 5 7 15
--------------- 30.7 30.5 33.3 30.0 10.5 22.9 34.9 32.9 48.6 25.0 33.3 34.0 37.0 35.1 28.6 31.3 30.4 24.6

VERY FAVORABLE 53 34 6 13 2 11 13 13 14 3 8 8 6 9 7 1 4 7
17.7 17.9 20.0 16.3 10.5 11.5 20.6 15.3 37.8 12.5 29.6 16.0 22.2 24.3 20.0 6.3 17.4 11.5

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 39 24 4 11 0 11 9 15 4 3 1 9 4 4 3 4 3 8
13.0 12.6 13.3 13.8 11.5 14.3 17.6 10.8 12.5 3.7 18.0 14.8 10.8 8.6 25.0 13.0 13.1

NO OPINION 32 20 2 10 3 14 3 12 0 2 4 10 2 1 2 2 2 7
10.7 10.5 6.7 12.5 15.8 14.6 4.8 14.1 8.3 14.8 20.0 7.4 2.7 5.7 12.5 8.7 11.5

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 114 75 13 26 7 26 24 40 17 8 10 16 11 17 16 2 9 25
----------------- 38.0 39.5 43.3 32.5 36.8 27.1 38.1 47.1 45.9 33.3 37.0 32.0 40.7 45.9 45.7 12.5 39.1 41.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 81 52 10 19 4 20 16 28 13 6 10 10 8 12 12 1 5 17
27.0 27.4 33.3 23.8 21.1 20.8 25.4 32.9 35.1 25.0 37.0 20.0 29.6 32.4 34.3 6.3 21.7 27.9

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 33 23 3 7 3 6 8 12 4 2 0 6 3 5 4 1 4 8
11.0 12.1 10.0 8.8 15.8 6.3 12.7 14.1 10.8 8.3 12.0 11.1 13.5 11.4 6.3 17.4 13.1

UNAWARE 56 33 5 18 6 33 13 4 0 8 4 6 2 6 5 7 4 14
------- 18.7 17.4 16.7 22.5 31.6 34.4 20.6 4.7 33.3 14.8 12.0 7.4 16.2 14.3 43.8 17.4 23.0

NEVER HEARD OF 56 33 5 18 6 33 13 4 0 8 4 6 2 6 5 7 4 14
18.7 17.4 16.7 22.5 31.6 34.4 20.6 4.7 33.3 14.8 12.0 7.4 16.2 14.3 43.8 17.4 23.0

UNSURE 3 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
1.0 0.5 2.5 1.0 1.6 2.7 3.7 5.7

REFUSED 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
1.0 1.6 5.3 1.2 2.7 2.0 3.7 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q11. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LARRY AGRAN

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 238 83 24 80 51 41 62 60 80 81 72 14 166 5 24 22 7 1 237 0 120 118
----- 79.3 78.3 66.7 95.2 68.9 78.8 87.3 84.5 90.9 84.4 67.3 82.4 83.4 100.0 66.7 64.7 77.8 100.0 79.3 69.0 93.7

FAVORABLE [NET] 92 16 9 54 13 13 14 5 70 52 13 6 64 3 11 7 1 1 91 0 46 46
--------------- 30.7 15.1 25.0 64.3 17.6 25.0 19.7 7.0 79.5 54.2 12.1 35.3 32.2 60.0 30.6 20.6 11.1 100.0 30.4 26.4 36.5

VERY FAVORABLE 53 7 4 36 6 5 4 2 47 36 6 4 38 1 5 5 0 1 52 0 25 28
17.7 6.6 11.1 42.9 8.1 9.6 5.6 2.8 53.4 37.5 5.6 23.5 19.1 20.0 13.9 14.7 100.0 17.4 14.4 22.2

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 39 9 5 18 7 8 10 3 23 16 7 2 26 2 6 2 1 0 39 0 21 18
13.0 8.5 13.9 21.4 9.5 15.4 14.1 4.2 26.1 16.7 6.5 11.8 13.1 40.0 16.7 5.9 11.1 13.0 12.1 14.3

NO OPINION 32 6 2 5 19 3 3 5 5 2 23 5 18 0 2 4 3 0 32 0 20 12
10.7 5.7 5.6 6.0 25.7 5.8 4.2 7.0 5.7 2.1 21.5 29.4 9.0 5.6 11.8 33.3 10.7 11.5 9.5

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 114 61 13 21 19 25 45 50 5 27 36 3 84 2 11 11 3 0 114 0 54 60
----------------- 38.0 57.5 36.1 25.0 25.7 48.1 63.4 70.4 5.7 28.1 33.6 17.6 42.2 40.0 30.6 32.4 33.3 38.1 31.0 47.6

VERY UNFAVORABLE 81 50 8 13 10 19 39 41 2 12 23 3 60 1 6 9 2 0 81 0 34 47
27.0 47.2 22.2 15.5 13.5 36.5 54.9 57.7 2.3 12.5 21.5 17.6 30.2 20.0 16.7 26.5 22.2 27.1 19.5 37.3

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 33 11 5 8 9 6 6 9 3 15 13 0 24 1 5 2 1 0 33 0 20 13
11.0 10.4 13.9 9.5 12.2 11.5 8.5 12.7 3.4 15.6 12.1 12.1 20.0 13.9 5.9 11.1 11.0 11.5 10.3

UNAWARE 56 22 12 3 19 11 7 11 7 14 31 3 29 0 11 12 1 0 56 0 51 5
------- 18.7 20.8 33.3 3.6 25.7 21.2 9.9 15.5 8.0 14.6 29.0 17.6 14.6 30.6 35.3 11.1 18.7 29.3 4.0

NEVER HEARD OF 56 22 12 3 19 11 7 11 7 14 31 3 29 0 11 12 1 0 56 0 51 5
18.7 20.8 33.3 3.6 25.7 21.2 9.9 15.5 8.0 14.6 29.0 17.6 14.6 30.6 35.3 11.1 18.7 29.3 4.0

UNSURE 3 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 2.7 1.4 1.1 1.9 1.0 2.8 1.0 1.1 0.8

REFUSED 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 2
1.0 1.2 2.7 1.4 1.0 1.9 1.0 11.1 1.0 0.6 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q12. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

EVAN CHEMERS

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 129 62 67 52 48 25 46 41 42 94 34 1 16 54 26 33 40 22 30 37
----- 43.0 42.8 43.2 42.6 50.0 35.2 44.2 52.6 35.6 41.8 45.9 100.0 31.4 51.4 38.8 42.9 47.1 36.7 42.3 44.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 32 14 18 18 8 5 15 8 9 28 4 0 3 13 6 10 9 5 7 11
--------------- 10.7 9.7 11.6 14.8 8.3 7.0 14.4 10.3 7.6 12.4 5.4 5.9 12.4 9.0 13.0 10.6 8.3 9.9 13.1

VERY FAVORABLE 7 2 5 4 2 0 2 2 3 7 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 2 0 5
2.3 1.4 3.2 3.3 2.1 1.9 2.6 2.5 3.1 4.5 5.2 3.3 6.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 25 12 13 14 6 5 13 6 6 21 4 0 3 13 3 6 9 3 7 6
8.3 8.3 8.4 11.5 6.3 7.0 12.5 7.7 5.1 9.3 5.4 5.9 12.4 4.5 7.8 10.6 5.0 9.9 7.1

NO OPINION 70 35 35 22 31 14 20 26 24 48 21 1 10 27 16 17 23 12 14 21
23.3 24.1 22.6 18.0 32.3 19.7 19.2 33.3 20.3 21.3 28.4 100.0 19.6 25.7 23.9 22.1 27.1 20.0 19.7 25.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 27 13 14 12 9 6 11 7 9 18 9 0 3 14 4 6 8 5 9 5
----------------- 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.8 9.4 8.5 10.6 9.0 7.6 8.0 12.2 5.9 13.3 6.0 7.8 9.4 8.3 12.7 6.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 14 5 9 5 5 4 5 3 6 7 7 0 2 8 1 3 4 1 6 3
4.7 3.4 5.8 4.1 5.2 5.6 4.8 3.8 5.1 3.1 9.5 3.9 7.6 1.5 3.9 4.7 1.7 8.5 3.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 13 8 5 7 4 2 6 4 3 11 2 0 1 6 3 3 4 4 3 2
4.3 5.5 3.2 5.7 4.2 2.8 5.8 5.1 2.5 4.9 2.7 2.0 5.7 4.5 3.9 4.7 6.7 4.2 2.4

UNAWARE 158 78 80 63 45 43 51 34 73 121 37 0 33 47 40 38 42 36 38 42
------- 52.7 53.8 51.6 51.6 46.9 60.6 49.0 43.6 61.9 53.8 50.0 64.7 44.8 59.7 49.4 49.4 60.0 53.5 50.0

NEVER HEARD OF 158 78 80 63 45 43 51 34 73 121 37 0 33 47 40 38 42 36 38 42
52.7 53.8 51.6 51.6 46.9 60.6 49.0 43.6 61.9 53.8 50.0 64.7 44.8 59.7 49.4 49.4 60.0 53.5 50.0

UNSURE 10 5 5 5 2 3 5 2 3 8 2 0 2 3 1 4 3 2 2 3
3.3 3.4 3.2 4.1 2.1 4.2 4.8 2.6 2.5 3.6 2.7 3.9 2.9 1.5 5.2 3.5 3.3 2.8 3.6

REFUSED 3 0 3 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2
1.0 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q12. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

EVAN CHEMERS

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 129 26 26 16 9 20 28 24 28 17 8 26 22 41 16 21 26 19 1 5 0
----- 43.0 44.8 40.6 34.8 36.0 57.1 45.9 50.0 37.8 36.2 33.3 51.0 48.9 47.7 40.0 48.8 35.1 43.2 33.3 50.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 32 7 11 4 1 3 5 7 11 4 1 5 3 12 5 8 3 2 0 2 0
--------------- 10.7 12.1 17.2 8.7 4.0 8.6 8.2 14.6 14.9 8.5 4.2 9.8 6.7 14.0 12.5 18.6 4.1 4.5 20.0

VERY FAVORABLE 7 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
2.3 3.4 3.1 3.3 5.4 4.4 5.8 2.3 2.3

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 25 5 9 4 1 3 3 7 7 4 1 5 1 7 5 7 3 1 0 2 0
8.3 8.6 14.1 8.7 4.0 8.6 4.9 14.6 9.5 8.5 4.2 9.8 2.2 8.1 12.5 16.3 4.1 2.3 20.0

NO OPINION 70 12 10 8 6 15 16 10 12 7 7 17 14 17 10 11 17 13 0 2 0
23.3 20.7 15.6 17.4 24.0 42.9 26.2 20.8 16.2 14.9 29.2 33.3 31.1 19.8 25.0 25.6 23.0 29.5 20.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 27 7 5 4 2 2 7 7 5 6 0 4 5 12 1 2 6 4 1 1 0
----------------- 9.0 12.1 7.8 8.7 8.0 5.7 11.5 14.6 6.8 12.8 7.8 11.1 14.0 2.5 4.7 8.1 9.1 33.3 10.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 14 2 3 3 1 0 5 3 2 4 0 3 2 5 0 2 4 2 0 1 0
4.7 3.4 4.7 6.5 4.0 8.2 6.3 2.7 8.5 5.9 4.4 5.8 4.7 5.4 4.5 10.0

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 13 5 2 1 1 2 2 4 3 2 0 1 3 7 1 0 2 2 1 0 0
4.3 8.6 3.1 2.2 4.0 5.7 3.3 8.3 4.1 4.3 2.0 6.7 8.1 2.5 2.7 4.5 33.3

UNAWARE 158 30 33 27 16 15 30 22 41 27 16 24 21 40 22 20 47 23 2 4 0
------- 52.7 51.7 51.6 58.7 64.0 42.9 49.2 45.8 55.4 57.4 66.7 47.1 46.7 46.5 55.0 46.5 63.5 52.3 66.7 40.0

NEVER HEARD OF 158 30 33 27 16 15 30 22 41 27 16 24 21 40 22 20 47 23 2 4 0
52.7 51.7 51.6 58.7 64.0 42.9 49.2 45.8 55.4 57.4 66.7 47.1 46.7 46.5 55.0 46.5 63.5 52.3 66.7 40.0

UNSURE 10 2 3 3 0 0 2 1 4 3 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 0 1 0
3.3 3.4 4.7 6.5 3.3 2.1 5.4 6.4 2.0 2.2 3.5 5.0 4.7 1.4 2.3 10.0

REFUSED 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
1.0 3.1 1.6 2.1 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q12. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

EVAN CHEMERS

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 129 83 13 33 7 46 25 36 15 5 19 21 12 18 15 7 8 24
----- 43.0 43.7 43.3 41.3 36.8 47.9 39.7 42.4 40.5 20.8 70.4 42.0 44.4 48.6 42.9 43.8 34.8 39.3

FAVORABLE [NET] 32 18 5 9 1 7 5 12 7 1 2 6 3 5 6 0 3 6
--------------- 10.7 9.5 16.7 11.3 5.3 7.3 7.9 14.1 18.9 4.2 7.4 12.0 11.1 13.5 17.1 13.0 9.8

VERY FAVORABLE 7 4 1 2 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3
2.3 2.1 3.3 2.5 1.0 3.5 8.1 4.0 5.7 4.9

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 25 14 4 7 1 6 5 9 4 1 2 4 3 5 4 0 3 3
8.3 7.4 13.3 8.8 5.3 6.3 7.9 10.6 10.8 4.2 7.4 8.0 11.1 13.5 11.4 13.0 4.9

NO OPINION 70 45 5 20 5 27 15 19 4 2 7 13 8 10 5 5 4 16
23.3 23.7 16.7 25.0 26.3 28.1 23.8 22.4 10.8 8.3 25.9 26.0 29.6 27.0 14.3 31.3 17.4 26.2

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 27 20 3 4 1 12 5 5 4 2 10 2 1 3 4 2 1 2
----------------- 9.0 10.5 10.0 5.0 5.3 12.5 7.9 5.9 10.8 8.3 37.0 4.0 3.7 8.1 11.4 12.5 4.3 3.3

VERY UNFAVORABLE 14 11 1 2 0 7 3 2 2 1 7 2 0 0 1 1 1 1
4.7 5.8 3.3 2.5 7.3 4.8 2.4 5.4 4.2 25.9 4.0 2.9 6.3 4.3 1.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 13 9 2 2 1 5 2 3 2 1 3 0 1 3 3 1 0 1
4.3 4.7 6.7 2.5 5.3 5.2 3.2 3.5 5.4 4.2 11.1 3.7 8.1 8.6 6.3 1.6

UNAWARE 158 97 16 45 11 45 35 47 20 18 6 27 15 18 19 8 12 35
------- 52.7 51.1 53.3 56.3 57.9 46.9 55.6 55.3 54.1 75.0 22.2 54.0 55.6 48.6 54.3 50.0 52.2 57.4

NEVER HEARD OF 158 97 16 45 11 45 35 47 20 18 6 27 15 18 19 8 12 35
52.7 51.1 53.3 56.3 57.9 46.9 55.6 55.3 54.1 75.0 22.2 54.0 55.6 48.6 54.3 50.0 52.2 57.4

UNSURE 10 8 0 2 0 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 2
3.3 4.2 2.5 5.2 3.2 2.4 2.7 4.2 3.7 2.0 2.7 2.9 6.3 8.7 3.3

REFUSED 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
1.0 1.1 3.3 5.3 1.6 2.7 3.7 2.0 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q12. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

EVAN CHEMERS

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 129 50 14 42 23 29 31 36 41 44 36 7 86 0 17 14 5 0 129 0 74 55
----- 43.0 47.2 38.9 50.0 31.1 55.8 43.7 50.7 46.6 45.8 33.6 41.2 43.2 47.2 41.2 55.6 43.1 42.5 43.7

FAVORABLE [NET] 32 12 6 10 4 18 8 10 9 11 3 1 22 0 5 3 1 0 32 0 17 15
--------------- 10.7 11.3 16.7 11.9 5.4 34.6 11.3 14.1 10.2 11.5 2.8 5.9 11.1 13.9 8.8 11.1 10.7 9.8 11.9

VERY FAVORABLE 7 2 1 3 1 7 0 2 2 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 2
2.3 1.9 2.8 3.6 1.4 13.5 2.8 2.3 3.1 3.5 2.3 2.9 1.6

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 25 10 5 7 3 11 8 8 7 8 3 1 15 0 5 3 1 0 25 0 12 13
8.3 9.4 13.9 8.3 4.1 21.2 11.3 11.3 8.0 8.3 2.8 5.9 7.5 13.9 8.8 11.1 8.4 6.9 10.3

NO OPINION 70 29 5 20 16 10 14 17 21 22 28 5 44 0 9 9 3 0 70 0 40 30
23.3 27.4 13.9 23.8 21.6 19.2 19.7 23.9 23.9 22.9 26.2 29.4 22.1 25.0 26.5 33.3 23.4 23.0 23.8

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 27 9 3 12 3 1 9 9 11 11 5 1 20 0 3 2 1 0 27 0 17 10
----------------- 9.0 8.5 8.3 14.3 4.1 1.9 12.7 12.7 12.5 11.5 4.7 5.9 10.1 8.3 5.9 11.1 9.0 9.8 7.9

VERY UNFAVORABLE 14 3 2 7 2 1 4 3 6 6 3 0 11 0 2 1 0 0 14 0 12 2
4.7 2.8 5.6 8.3 2.7 1.9 5.6 4.2 6.8 6.3 2.8 5.5 5.6 2.9 4.7 6.9 1.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 13 6 1 5 1 0 5 6 5 5 2 1 9 0 1 1 1 0 13 0 5 8
4.3 5.7 2.8 6.0 1.4 7.0 8.5 5.7 5.2 1.9 5.9 4.5 2.8 2.9 11.1 4.3 2.9 6.3

UNAWARE 158 54 21 37 46 20 38 31 43 49 66 10 104 5 16 20 3 1 157 0 93 65
------- 52.7 50.9 58.3 44.0 62.2 38.5 53.5 43.7 48.9 51.0 61.7 58.8 52.3 100.0 44.4 58.8 33.3 100.0 52.5 53.4 51.6

NEVER HEARD OF 158 54 21 37 46 20 38 31 43 49 66 10 104 5 16 20 3 1 157 0 93 65
52.7 50.9 58.3 44.0 62.2 38.5 53.5 43.7 48.9 51.0 61.7 58.8 52.3 100.0 44.4 58.8 33.3 100.0 52.5 53.4 51.6

UNSURE 10 2 1 4 3 3 2 4 3 2 3 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 0 6 4
3.3 1.9 2.8 4.8 4.1 5.8 2.8 5.6 3.4 2.1 2.8 3.5 8.3 3.3 3.4 3.2

REFUSED 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 2
1.0 1.2 2.7 1.1 1.0 1.9 1.0 11.1 1.0 0.6 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q13. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LYNN SCHOTT

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 161 75 86 73 52 30 62 44 55 131 30 0 12 58 39 52 39 36 31 55
----- 53.7 51.7 55.5 59.8 54.2 42.3 59.6 56.4 46.6 58.2 40.5 23.5 55.2 58.2 67.5 45.9 60.0 43.7 65.5

FAVORABLE [NET] 47 23 24 31 8 8 28 7 12 41 6 0 2 12 14 19 9 14 5 19
--------------- 15.7 15.9 15.5 25.4 8.3 11.3 26.9 9.0 10.2 18.2 8.1 3.9 11.4 20.9 24.7 10.6 23.3 7.0 22.6

VERY FAVORABLE 16 9 7 12 1 3 11 1 4 13 3 0 2 5 2 7 4 5 3 4
5.3 6.2 4.5 9.8 1.0 4.2 10.6 1.3 3.4 5.8 4.1 3.9 4.8 3.0 9.1 4.7 8.3 4.2 4.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 31 14 17 19 7 5 17 6 8 28 3 0 0 7 12 12 5 9 2 15
10.3 9.7 11.0 15.6 7.3 7.0 16.3 7.7 6.8 12.4 4.1 6.7 17.9 15.6 5.9 15.0 2.8 17.9

NO OPINION 58 25 33 23 17 12 18 13 27 41 17 0 7 25 16 10 15 10 17 16
19.3 17.2 21.3 18.9 17.7 16.9 17.3 16.7 22.9 18.2 23.0 13.7 23.8 23.9 13.0 17.6 16.7 23.9 19.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 56 27 29 19 27 10 16 24 16 49 7 0 3 21 9 23 15 12 9 20
----------------- 18.7 18.6 18.7 15.6 28.1 14.1 15.4 30.8 13.6 21.8 9.5 5.9 20.0 13.4 29.9 17.6 20.0 12.7 23.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 24 11 13 7 14 3 7 13 4 21 3 0 1 7 4 12 5 6 3 10
8.0 7.6 8.4 5.7 14.6 4.2 6.7 16.7 3.4 9.3 4.1 2.0 6.7 6.0 15.6 5.9 10.0 4.2 11.9

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 32 16 16 12 13 7 9 11 12 28 4 0 2 14 5 11 10 6 6 10
10.7 11.0 10.3 9.8 13.5 9.9 8.7 14.1 10.2 12.4 5.4 3.9 13.3 7.5 14.3 11.8 10.0 8.5 11.9

UNAWARE 125 64 61 41 41 38 35 31 59 83 41 1 37 45 24 19 43 21 39 22
------- 41.7 44.1 39.4 33.6 42.7 53.5 33.7 39.7 50.0 36.9 55.4 100.0 72.5 42.9 35.8 24.7 50.6 35.0 54.9 26.2

NEVER HEARD OF 125 64 61 41 41 38 35 31 59 83 41 1 37 45 24 19 43 21 39 22
41.7 44.1 39.4 33.6 42.7 53.5 33.7 39.7 50.0 36.9 55.4 100.0 72.5 42.9 35.8 24.7 50.6 35.0 54.9 26.2

UNSURE 12 6 6 6 3 3 5 3 4 9 3 0 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 5
4.0 4.1 3.9 4.9 3.1 4.2 4.8 3.8 3.4 4.0 4.1 3.9 1.9 6.0 5.2 3.5 5.0 1.4 6.0

REFUSED 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
0.7 1.3 1.6 1.9 0.9 2.6 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q13. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LYNN SCHOTT

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 161 34 39 17 13 21 31 26 47 18 12 21 31 65 24 21 32 13 2 4 0
----- 53.7 58.6 60.9 37.0 52.0 60.0 50.8 54.2 63.5 38.3 50.0 41.2 68.9 75.6 60.0 48.8 43.2 29.5 66.7 40.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 47 13 18 7 1 3 5 7 24 5 3 2 6 24 5 7 8 2 0 1 0
--------------- 15.7 22.4 28.1 15.2 4.0 8.6 8.2 14.6 32.4 10.6 12.5 3.9 13.3 27.9 12.5 16.3 10.8 4.5 10.0

VERY FAVORABLE 16 6 6 2 1 1 0 4 8 2 1 1 0 7 2 2 2 2 0 1 0
5.3 10.3 9.4 4.3 4.0 2.9 8.3 10.8 4.3 4.2 2.0 8.1 5.0 4.7 2.7 4.5 10.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 31 7 12 5 0 2 5 3 16 3 2 1 6 17 3 5 6 0 0 0 0
10.3 12.1 18.8 10.9 5.7 8.2 6.3 21.6 6.4 8.3 2.0 13.3 19.8 7.5 11.6 8.1

NO OPINION 58 12 11 5 7 5 12 13 10 5 7 9 8 15 8 5 19 7 2 2 0
19.3 20.7 17.2 10.9 28.0 14.3 19.7 27.1 13.5 10.6 29.2 17.6 17.8 17.4 20.0 11.6 25.7 15.9 66.7 20.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 56 9 10 5 5 13 14 6 13 8 2 10 17 26 11 9 5 4 0 1 0
----------------- 18.7 15.5 15.6 10.9 20.0 37.1 23.0 12.5 17.6 17.0 8.3 19.6 37.8 30.2 27.5 20.9 6.8 9.1 10.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 24 2 5 2 1 7 7 2 5 3 0 3 11 11 6 2 3 1 0 1 0
8.0 3.4 7.8 4.3 4.0 20.0 11.5 4.2 6.8 6.4 5.9 24.4 12.8 15.0 4.7 4.1 2.3 10.0

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 32 7 5 3 4 6 7 4 8 5 2 7 6 15 5 7 2 3 0 0 0
10.7 12.1 7.8 6.5 16.0 17.1 11.5 8.3 10.8 10.6 8.3 13.7 13.3 17.4 12.5 16.3 2.7 6.8

UNAWARE 125 22 19 26 12 13 28 21 20 28 10 28 13 17 12 20 40 30 1 5 0
------- 41.7 37.9 29.7 56.5 48.0 37.1 45.9 43.8 27.0 59.6 41.7 54.9 28.9 19.8 30.0 46.5 54.1 68.2 33.3 50.0

NEVER HEARD OF 125 22 19 26 12 13 28 21 20 28 10 28 13 17 12 20 40 30 1 5 0
41.7 37.9 29.7 56.5 48.0 37.1 45.9 43.8 27.0 59.6 41.7 54.9 28.9 19.8 30.0 46.5 54.1 68.2 33.3 50.0

UNSURE 12 2 4 3 0 1 2 1 5 1 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 1 0 1 0
4.0 3.4 6.3 6.5 2.9 3.3 2.1 6.8 2.1 8.3 3.9 2.2 2.3 10.0 4.7 2.7 2.3 10.0

REFUSED 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 3.1 2.7 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q13. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LYNN SCHOTT

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 161 102 20 39 8 41 33 50 29 10 19 25 18 23 21 4 11 30
----- 53.7 53.7 66.7 48.8 42.1 42.7 52.4 58.8 78.4 41.7 70.4 50.0 66.7 62.2 60.0 25.0 47.8 49.2

FAVORABLE [NET] 47 28 9 10 1 6 9 19 12 3 4 6 8 9 5 1 0 11
--------------- 15.7 14.7 30.0 12.5 5.3 6.3 14.3 22.4 32.4 12.5 14.8 12.0 29.6 24.3 14.3 6.3 18.0

VERY FAVORABLE 16 8 2 6 1 4 2 5 4 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 0 5
5.3 4.2 6.7 7.5 5.3 4.2 3.2 5.9 10.8 8.3 3.7 4.0 3.7 5.4 5.7 6.3 8.2

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 31 20 7 4 0 2 7 14 8 1 3 4 7 7 3 0 0 6
10.3 10.5 23.3 5.0 2.1 11.1 16.5 21.6 4.2 11.1 8.0 25.9 18.9 8.6 9.8

NO OPINION 58 31 5 22 6 19 13 17 3 2 9 11 8 6 7 1 4 10
19.3 16.3 16.7 27.5 31.6 19.8 20.6 20.0 8.1 8.3 33.3 22.0 29.6 16.2 20.0 6.3 17.4 16.4

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 56 43 6 7 1 16 11 14 14 5 6 8 2 8 9 2 7 9
----------------- 18.7 22.6 20.0 8.8 5.3 16.7 17.5 16.5 37.8 20.8 22.2 16.0 7.4 21.6 25.7 12.5 30.4 14.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 24 19 3 2 1 7 3 7 6 1 2 3 1 6 4 0 3 4
8.0 10.0 10.0 2.5 5.3 7.3 4.8 8.2 16.2 4.2 7.4 6.0 3.7 16.2 11.4 13.0 6.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 32 24 3 5 0 9 8 7 8 4 4 5 1 2 5 2 4 5
10.7 12.6 10.0 6.3 9.4 12.7 8.2 21.6 16.7 14.8 10.0 3.7 5.4 14.3 12.5 17.4 8.2

UNAWARE 125 77 9 39 10 50 27 33 5 13 7 22 9 13 12 12 9 28
------- 41.7 40.5 30.0 48.8 52.6 52.1 42.9 38.8 13.5 54.2 25.9 44.0 33.3 35.1 34.3 75.0 39.1 45.9

NEVER HEARD OF 125 77 9 39 10 50 27 33 5 13 7 22 9 13 12 12 9 28
41.7 40.5 30.0 48.8 52.6 52.1 42.9 38.8 13.5 54.2 25.9 44.0 33.3 35.1 34.3 75.0 39.1 45.9

UNSURE 12 9 1 2 1 5 3 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 3 3
4.0 4.7 3.3 2.5 5.3 5.2 4.8 2.4 2.7 4.2 3.7 4.0 2.7 2.9 13.0 4.9

REFUSED 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 1.1 5.4 2.0 2.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q13. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

LYNN SCHOTT

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 161 61 15 58 27 29 44 48 53 62 41 8 115 3 15 15 5 1 160 0 76 85
----- 53.7 57.5 41.7 69.0 36.5 55.8 62.0 67.6 60.2 64.6 38.3 47.1 57.8 60.0 41.7 44.1 55.6 100.0 53.5 43.7 67.5

FAVORABLE [NET] 47 35 2 8 2 7 32 27 7 9 6 2 35 1 2 6 1 0 47 0 12 35
--------------- 15.7 33.0 5.6 9.5 2.7 13.5 45.1 38.0 8.0 9.4 5.6 11.8 17.6 20.0 5.6 17.6 11.1 15.7 6.9 27.8

VERY FAVORABLE 16 14 0 0 2 2 14 12 0 2 1 2 11 0 1 2 0 0 16 0 6 10
5.3 13.2 2.7 3.8 19.7 16.9 2.1 0.9 11.8 5.5 2.8 5.9 5.4 3.4 7.9

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 31 21 2 8 0 5 18 15 7 7 5 0 24 1 1 4 1 0 31 0 6 25
10.3 19.8 5.6 9.5 9.6 25.4 21.1 8.0 7.3 4.7 12.1 20.0 2.8 11.8 11.1 10.4 3.4 19.8

NO OPINION 58 15 9 13 21 11 8 13 14 18 25 5 33 1 8 8 3 1 57 0 38 20
19.3 14.2 25.0 15.5 28.4 21.2 11.3 18.3 15.9 18.8 23.4 29.4 16.6 20.0 22.2 23.5 33.3 100.0 19.1 21.8 15.9

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 56 11 4 37 4 11 4 8 32 35 10 1 47 1 5 1 1 0 56 0 26 30
----------------- 18.7 10.4 11.1 44.0 5.4 21.2 5.6 11.3 36.4 36.5 9.3 5.9 23.6 20.0 13.9 2.9 11.1 18.7 14.9 23.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 24 4 3 16 1 5 1 2 16 15 4 1 20 0 1 1 1 0 24 0 12 12
8.0 3.8 8.3 19.0 1.4 9.6 1.4 2.8 18.2 15.6 3.7 5.9 10.1 2.8 2.9 11.1 8.0 6.9 9.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 32 7 1 21 3 6 3 6 16 20 6 0 27 1 4 0 0 0 32 0 14 18
10.7 6.6 2.8 25.0 4.1 11.5 4.2 8.5 18.2 20.8 5.6 13.6 20.0 11.1 10.7 8.0 14.3

UNAWARE 125 43 20 20 42 21 24 22 29 30 60 8 73 2 19 19 4 0 125 0 89 36
------- 41.7 40.6 55.6 23.8 56.8 40.4 33.8 31.0 33.0 31.3 56.1 47.1 36.7 40.0 52.8 55.9 44.4 41.8 51.1 28.6

NEVER HEARD OF 125 43 20 20 42 21 24 22 29 30 60 8 73 2 19 19 4 0 125 0 89 36
41.7 40.6 55.6 23.8 56.8 40.4 33.8 31.0 33.0 31.3 56.1 47.1 36.7 40.0 52.8 55.9 44.4 41.8 51.1 28.6

UNSURE 12 2 1 5 4 1 3 1 5 4 5 1 9 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 8 4
4.0 1.9 2.8 6.0 5.4 1.9 4.2 1.4 5.7 4.2 4.7 5.9 4.5 5.6 4.0 4.6 3.2

REFUSED 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q14. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MELISSA FOX

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 177 82 95 69 66 34 59 55 63 133 44 0 23 60 39 55 46 36 37 58
----- 59.0 56.6 61.3 56.6 68.8 47.9 56.7 70.5 53.4 59.1 59.5 45.1 57.1 58.2 71.4 54.1 60.0 52.1 69.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 31 33 17 35 11 13 28 23 54 10 0 4 21 18 21 14 17 11 22
--------------- 21.3 21.4 21.3 13.9 36.5 15.5 12.5 35.9 19.5 24.0 13.5 7.8 20.0 26.9 27.3 16.5 28.3 15.5 26.2

VERY FAVORABLE 26 9 17 5 18 3 3 14 9 23 3 0 2 9 6 9 4 5 7 10
8.7 6.2 11.0 4.1 18.8 4.2 2.9 17.9 7.6 10.2 4.1 3.9 8.6 9.0 11.7 4.7 8.3 9.9 11.9

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 38 22 16 12 17 8 10 14 14 31 7 0 2 12 12 12 10 12 4 12
12.7 15.2 10.3 9.8 17.7 11.3 9.6 17.9 11.9 13.8 9.5 3.9 11.4 17.9 15.6 11.8 20.0 5.6 14.3

NO OPINION 75 37 38 22 26 20 18 22 35 50 25 0 17 26 17 15 25 12 18 20
25.0 25.5 24.5 18.0 27.1 28.2 17.3 28.2 29.7 22.2 33.8 33.3 24.8 25.4 19.5 29.4 20.0 25.4 23.8

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 38 14 24 30 5 3 28 5 5 29 9 0 2 13 4 19 7 7 8 16
----------------- 12.7 9.7 15.5 24.6 5.2 4.2 26.9 6.4 4.2 12.9 12.2 3.9 12.4 6.0 24.7 8.2 11.7 11.3 19.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 18 9 9 15 2 1 15 2 1 14 4 0 0 7 0 11 5 4 2 7
6.0 6.2 5.8 12.3 2.1 1.4 14.4 2.6 0.8 6.2 5.4 6.7 14.3 5.9 6.7 2.8 8.3

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 5 15 15 3 2 13 3 4 15 5 0 2 6 4 8 2 3 6 9
6.7 3.4 9.7 12.3 3.1 2.8 12.5 3.8 3.4 6.7 6.8 3.9 5.7 6.0 10.4 2.4 5.0 8.5 10.7

UNAWARE 110 55 55 44 28 35 39 21 50 80 29 1 26 41 25 18 35 20 32 23
------- 36.7 37.9 35.5 36.1 29.2 49.3 37.5 26.9 42.4 35.6 39.2 100.0 51.0 39.0 37.3 23.4 41.2 33.3 45.1 27.4

NEVER HEARD OF 110 55 55 44 28 35 39 21 50 80 29 1 26 41 25 18 35 20 32 23
36.7 37.9 35.5 36.1 29.2 49.3 37.5 26.9 42.4 35.6 39.2 100.0 51.0 39.0 37.3 23.4 41.2 33.3 45.1 27.4

UNSURE 11 7 4 7 2 2 5 2 4 10 1 0 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 2
3.7 4.8 2.6 5.7 2.1 2.8 4.8 2.6 3.4 4.4 1.4 3.9 3.8 3.0 3.9 4.7 5.0 2.8 2.4

REFUSED 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
0.7 0.7 0.6 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q14. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MELISSA FOX

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 177 32 37 20 14 26 40 25 44 20 14 31 35 64 24 25 36 18 2 8 0
----- 59.0 55.2 57.8 43.5 56.0 74.3 65.6 52.1 59.5 42.6 58.3 60.8 77.8 74.4 60.0 58.1 48.6 40.9 66.7 80.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 9 8 7 4 15 20 6 11 7 4 11 24 28 11 12 6 5 0 2 0
--------------- 21.3 15.5 12.5 15.2 16.0 42.9 32.8 12.5 14.9 14.9 16.7 21.6 53.3 32.6 27.5 27.9 8.1 11.4 20.0

VERY FAVORABLE 26 2 3 0 3 7 11 3 2 2 1 6 12 16 3 2 2 3 0 0 0
8.7 3.4 4.7 12.0 20.0 18.0 6.3 2.7 4.3 4.2 11.8 26.7 18.6 7.5 4.7 2.7 6.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 38 7 5 7 1 8 9 3 9 5 3 5 12 12 8 10 4 2 0 2 0
12.7 12.1 7.8 15.2 4.0 22.9 14.8 6.3 12.2 10.6 12.5 9.8 26.7 14.0 20.0 23.3 5.4 4.5 20.0

NO OPINION 75 13 9 12 8 8 18 10 12 10 10 17 9 13 10 9 26 10 2 5 0
25.0 22.4 14.1 26.1 32.0 22.9 29.5 20.8 16.2 21.3 41.7 33.3 20.0 15.1 25.0 20.9 35.1 22.7 66.7 50.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 38 10 20 1 2 3 2 9 21 3 0 3 2 23 3 4 4 3 0 1 0
----------------- 12.7 17.2 31.3 2.2 8.0 8.6 3.3 18.8 28.4 6.4 5.9 4.4 26.7 7.5 9.3 5.4 6.8 10.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 18 6 9 1 0 2 0 5 10 1 0 1 1 12 1 1 2 2 0 0 0
6.0 10.3 14.1 2.2 5.7 10.4 13.5 2.1 2.0 2.2 14.0 2.5 2.3 2.7 4.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 4 11 0 2 1 2 4 11 2 0 2 1 11 2 3 2 1 0 1 0
6.7 6.9 17.2 8.0 2.9 3.3 8.3 14.9 4.3 3.9 2.2 12.8 5.0 7.0 2.7 2.3 10.0

UNAWARE 110 20 24 25 10 8 20 20 24 26 9 18 10 19 14 15 34 25 1 2 0
------- 36.7 34.5 37.5 54.3 40.0 22.9 32.8 41.7 32.4 55.3 37.5 35.3 22.2 22.1 35.0 34.9 45.9 56.8 33.3 20.0

NEVER HEARD OF 110 20 24 25 10 8 20 20 24 26 9 18 10 19 14 15 34 25 1 2 0
36.7 34.5 37.5 54.3 40.0 22.9 32.8 41.7 32.4 55.3 37.5 35.3 22.2 22.1 35.0 34.9 45.9 56.8 33.3 20.0

UNSURE 11 5 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 2 0 1 2 3 4 1 0 0 0
3.7 8.6 3.1 2.2 4.0 2.9 1.6 6.3 5.4 2.1 4.2 3.9 1.2 5.0 7.0 5.4 2.3

REFUSED 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.7 1.6 2.7 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q14. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MELISSA FOX

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 177 111 22 44 11 52 39 51 24 13 17 22 20 27 22 5 13 38
----- 59.0 58.4 73.3 55.0 57.9 54.2 61.9 60.0 64.9 54.2 63.0 44.0 74.1 73.0 62.9 31.3 56.5 62.3

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 44 8 12 1 17 13 20 13 6 4 7 4 11 12 2 8 10
--------------- 21.3 23.2 26.7 15.0 5.3 17.7 20.6 23.5 35.1 25.0 14.8 14.0 14.8 29.7 34.3 12.5 34.8 16.4

VERY FAVORABLE 26 18 5 3 1 4 6 9 6 2 2 3 1 6 4 1 2 5
8.7 9.5 16.7 3.8 5.3 4.2 9.5 10.6 16.2 8.3 7.4 6.0 3.7 16.2 11.4 6.3 8.7 8.2

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 38 26 3 9 0 13 7 11 7 4 2 4 3 5 8 1 6 5
12.7 13.7 10.0 11.3 13.5 11.1 12.9 18.9 16.7 7.4 8.0 11.1 13.5 22.9 6.3 26.1 8.2

NO OPINION 75 42 7 26 8 24 21 19 3 6 8 14 10 8 5 2 4 18
25.0 22.1 23.3 32.5 42.1 25.0 33.3 22.4 8.1 25.0 29.6 28.0 37.0 21.6 14.3 12.5 17.4 29.5

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 38 25 7 6 2 11 5 12 8 1 5 1 6 8 5 1 1 10
----------------- 12.7 13.2 23.3 7.5 10.5 11.5 7.9 14.1 21.6 4.2 18.5 2.0 22.2 21.6 14.3 6.3 4.3 16.4

VERY UNFAVORABLE 18 13 3 2 0 4 3 7 4 1 3 0 2 2 2 0 1 7
6.0 6.8 10.0 2.5 4.2 4.8 8.2 10.8 4.2 11.1 7.4 5.4 5.7 4.3 11.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 12 4 4 2 7 2 5 4 0 2 1 4 6 3 1 0 3
6.7 6.3 13.3 5.0 10.5 7.3 3.2 5.9 10.8 7.4 2.0 14.8 16.2 8.6 6.3 4.9

UNAWARE 110 71 7 32 8 39 24 31 8 11 10 23 7 9 10 11 7 22
------- 36.7 37.4 23.3 40.0 42.1 40.6 38.1 36.5 21.6 45.8 37.0 46.0 25.9 24.3 28.6 68.8 30.4 36.1

NEVER HEARD OF 110 71 7 32 8 39 24 31 8 11 10 23 7 9 10 11 7 22
36.7 37.4 23.3 40.0 42.1 40.6 38.1 36.5 21.6 45.8 37.0 46.0 25.9 24.3 28.6 68.8 30.4 36.1

UNSURE 11 7 1 3 0 5 0 3 3 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 3 1
3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 5.2 3.5 8.1 8.0 2.7 5.7 13.0 1.6

REFUSED 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 1.3 5.4 2.0 2.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q14. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MELISSA FOX

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 177 66 18 61 32 26 43 48 58 69 53 10 120 4 21 17 5 1 176 0 94 83
----- 59.0 62.3 50.0 72.6 43.2 50.0 60.6 67.6 65.9 71.9 49.5 58.8 60.3 80.0 58.3 50.0 55.6 100.0 58.9 54.0 65.9

FAVORABLE [NET] 64 11 6 45 2 9 9 7 40 51 6 3 48 1 8 4 0 0 64 0 31 33
--------------- 21.3 10.4 16.7 53.6 2.7 17.3 12.7 9.9 45.5 53.1 5.6 17.6 24.1 20.0 22.2 11.8 21.4 17.8 26.2

VERY FAVORABLE 26 1 1 23 1 1 2 3 22 24 0 1 21 1 0 3 0 0 26 0 10 16
8.7 0.9 2.8 27.4 1.4 1.9 2.8 4.2 25.0 25.0 5.9 10.6 20.0 8.8 8.7 5.7 12.7

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 38 10 5 22 1 8 7 4 18 27 6 2 27 0 8 1 0 0 38 0 21 17
12.7 9.4 13.9 26.2 1.4 15.4 9.9 5.6 20.5 28.1 5.6 11.8 13.6 22.2 2.9 12.7 12.1 13.5

NO OPINION 75 29 10 12 24 12 11 16 15 15 39 5 44 2 12 9 3 1 74 0 50 25
25.0 27.4 27.8 14.3 32.4 23.1 15.5 22.5 17.0 15.6 36.4 29.4 22.1 40.0 33.3 26.5 33.3 100.0 24.7 28.7 19.8

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 38 26 2 4 6 5 23 25 3 3 8 2 28 1 1 4 2 0 38 0 13 25
----------------- 12.7 24.5 5.6 4.8 8.1 9.6 32.4 35.2 3.4 3.1 7.5 11.8 14.1 20.0 2.8 11.8 22.2 12.7 7.5 19.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 18 13 2 0 3 2 11 12 0 0 5 2 12 1 0 1 2 0 18 0 7 11
6.0 12.3 5.6 4.1 3.8 15.5 16.9 4.7 11.8 6.0 20.0 2.9 22.2 6.0 4.0 8.7

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 13 0 4 3 3 12 13 3 3 3 0 16 0 1 3 0 0 20 0 6 14
6.7 12.3 4.8 4.1 5.8 16.9 18.3 3.4 3.1 2.8 8.0 2.8 8.8 6.7 3.4 11.1

UNAWARE 110 38 16 19 37 21 27 21 25 25 49 6 67 1 15 17 4 0 110 0 72 38
------- 36.7 35.8 44.4 22.6 50.0 40.4 38.0 29.6 28.4 26.0 45.8 35.3 33.7 20.0 41.7 50.0 44.4 36.8 41.4 30.2

NEVER HEARD OF 110 38 16 19 37 21 27 21 25 25 49 6 67 1 15 17 4 0 110 0 72 38
36.7 35.8 44.4 22.6 50.0 40.4 38.0 29.6 28.4 26.0 45.8 35.3 33.7 20.0 41.7 50.0 44.4 36.8 41.4 30.2

UNSURE 11 2 2 3 4 4 1 2 4 2 4 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 7 4
3.7 1.9 5.6 3.6 5.4 7.7 1.4 2.8 4.5 2.1 3.7 5.9 5.0 3.7 4.0 3.2

REFUSED 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q15. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MARY ANN GAIDO

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 188 82 106 79 64 38 69 53 66 145 43 0 14 68 47 59 44 38 38 68
----- 62.7 56.6 68.4 64.8 66.7 53.5 66.3 67.9 55.9 64.4 58.1 27.5 64.8 70.1 76.6 51.8 63.3 53.5 81.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 76 25 51 24 37 13 19 32 25 63 13 0 0 23 24 29 8 17 15 36
--------------- 25.3 17.2 32.9 19.7 38.5 18.3 18.3 41.0 21.2 28.0 17.6 21.9 35.8 37.7 9.4 28.3 21.1 42.9

VERY FAVORABLE 40 14 26 14 20 6 12 16 12 32 8 0 0 9 11 20 4 10 5 21
13.3 9.7 16.8 11.5 20.8 8.5 11.5 20.5 10.2 14.2 10.8 8.6 16.4 26.0 4.7 16.7 7.0 25.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 36 11 25 10 17 7 7 16 13 31 5 0 0 14 13 9 4 7 10 15
12.0 7.6 16.1 8.2 17.7 9.9 6.7 20.5 11.0 13.8 6.8 13.3 19.4 11.7 4.7 11.7 14.1 17.9

NO OPINION 63 32 31 21 19 18 18 14 31 47 16 0 11 31 15 6 23 9 19 12
21.0 22.1 20.0 17.2 19.8 25.4 17.3 17.9 26.3 20.9 21.6 21.6 29.5 22.4 7.8 27.1 15.0 26.8 14.3

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 49 25 24 34 8 7 32 7 10 35 14 0 3 14 8 24 13 12 4 20
----------------- 16.3 17.2 15.5 27.9 8.3 9.9 30.8 9.0 8.5 15.6 18.9 5.9 13.3 11.9 31.2 15.3 20.0 5.6 23.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 26 15 11 22 2 2 20 1 5 19 7 0 0 7 3 16 5 10 2 9
8.7 10.3 7.1 18.0 2.1 2.8 19.2 1.3 4.2 8.4 9.5 6.7 4.5 20.8 5.9 16.7 2.8 10.7

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 10 13 12 6 5 12 6 5 16 7 0 3 7 5 8 8 2 2 11
7.7 6.9 8.4 9.8 6.3 7.0 11.5 7.7 4.2 7.1 9.5 5.9 6.7 7.5 10.4 9.4 3.3 2.8 13.1

UNAWARE 101 55 46 36 31 30 30 24 47 71 29 1 34 35 17 15 38 17 31 15
------- 33.7 37.9 29.7 29.5 32.3 42.3 28.8 30.8 39.8 31.6 39.2 100.0 66.7 33.3 25.4 19.5 44.7 28.3 43.7 17.9

NEVER HEARD OF 101 55 46 36 31 30 30 24 47 71 29 1 34 35 17 15 38 17 31 15
33.7 37.9 29.7 29.5 32.3 42.3 28.8 30.8 39.8 31.6 39.2 100.0 66.7 33.3 25.4 19.5 44.7 28.3 43.7 17.9

UNSURE 10 8 2 6 1 3 4 1 5 9 1 0 3 1 3 3 3 5 1 1
3.3 5.5 1.3 4.9 1.0 4.2 3.8 1.3 4.2 4.0 1.4 5.9 1.0 4.5 3.9 3.5 8.3 1.4 1.2

REFUSED 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q15. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MARY ANN GAIDO

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 188 32 47 21 17 26 38 24 55 24 14 28 36 72 25 25 38 19 3 6 0
----- 62.7 55.2 73.4 45.7 68.0 74.3 62.3 50.0 74.3 51.1 58.3 54.9 80.0 83.7 62.5 58.1 51.4 43.2 100.0 60.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 76 7 17 5 8 13 24 3 21 8 5 11 26 38 10 10 12 5 0 1 0
--------------- 25.3 12.1 26.6 10.9 32.0 37.1 39.3 6.3 28.4 17.0 20.8 21.6 57.8 44.2 25.0 23.3 16.2 11.4 10.0

VERY FAVORABLE 40 4 10 2 4 8 12 2 12 4 2 3 17 21 6 6 4 3 0 0 0
13.3 6.9 15.6 4.3 16.0 22.9 19.7 4.2 16.2 8.5 8.3 5.9 37.8 24.4 15.0 14.0 5.4 6.8

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 36 3 7 3 4 5 12 1 9 4 3 8 9 17 4 4 8 2 0 1 0
12.0 5.2 10.9 6.5 16.0 14.3 19.7 2.1 12.2 8.5 12.5 15.7 20.0 19.8 10.0 9.3 10.8 4.5 10.0

NO OPINION 63 10 11 11 7 8 11 12 9 11 7 14 5 9 8 8 22 9 3 4 0
21.0 17.2 17.2 23.9 28.0 22.9 18.0 25.0 12.2 23.4 29.2 27.5 11.1 10.5 20.0 18.6 29.7 20.5 100.0 40.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 49 15 19 5 2 5 3 9 25 5 2 3 5 25 7 7 4 5 0 1 0
----------------- 16.3 25.9 29.7 10.9 8.0 14.3 4.9 18.8 33.8 10.6 8.3 5.9 11.1 29.1 17.5 16.3 5.4 11.4 10.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 26 11 11 2 0 2 0 6 16 1 1 0 2 15 4 3 2 2 0 0 0
8.7 19.0 17.2 4.3 5.7 12.5 21.6 2.1 4.2 4.4 17.4 10.0 7.0 2.7 4.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 4 8 3 2 3 3 3 9 4 1 3 3 10 3 4 2 3 0 1 0
7.7 6.9 12.5 6.5 8.0 8.6 4.9 6.3 12.2 8.5 4.2 5.9 6.7 11.6 7.5 9.3 2.7 6.8 10.0

UNAWARE 101 21 15 23 7 8 23 22 14 21 9 22 9 14 12 14 34 23 0 4 0
------- 33.7 36.2 23.4 50.0 28.0 22.9 37.7 45.8 18.9 44.7 37.5 43.1 20.0 16.3 30.0 32.6 45.9 52.3 40.0

NEVER HEARD OF 101 21 15 23 7 8 23 22 14 21 9 22 9 14 12 14 34 23 0 4 0
33.7 36.2 23.4 50.0 28.0 22.9 37.7 45.8 18.9 44.7 37.5 43.1 20.0 16.3 30.0 32.6 45.9 52.3 40.0

UNSURE 10 5 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 2 1 1 0 0 3 4 2 1 0 0 0
3.3 8.6 1.6 4.3 4.0 2.9 2.1 6.8 4.3 4.2 2.0 7.5 9.3 2.7 2.3

REFUSED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 1.6 2.1 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q15. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MARY ANN GAIDO

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 188 119 23 46 11 49 37 60 31 13 18 26 20 27 24 6 16 38
----- 62.7 62.6 76.7 57.5 57.9 51.0 58.7 70.6 83.8 54.2 66.7 52.0 74.1 73.0 68.6 37.5 69.6 62.3

FAVORABLE [NET] 76 49 13 14 2 13 20 27 14 7 7 8 6 12 13 4 6 13
--------------- 25.3 25.8 43.3 17.5 10.5 13.5 31.7 31.8 37.8 29.2 25.9 16.0 22.2 32.4 37.1 25.0 26.1 21.3

VERY FAVORABLE 40 27 8 5 2 5 11 13 9 2 5 3 2 9 8 0 3 8
13.3 14.2 26.7 6.3 10.5 5.2 17.5 15.3 24.3 8.3 18.5 6.0 7.4 24.3 22.9 13.0 13.1

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 36 22 5 9 0 8 9 14 5 5 2 5 4 3 5 4 3 5
12.0 11.6 16.7 11.3 8.3 14.3 16.5 13.5 20.8 7.4 10.0 14.8 8.1 14.3 25.0 13.0 8.2

NO OPINION 63 37 4 22 7 22 10 20 4 3 6 13 6 6 6 2 7 14
21.0 19.5 13.3 27.5 36.8 22.9 15.9 23.5 10.8 12.5 22.2 26.0 22.2 16.2 17.1 12.5 30.4 23.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 49 33 6 10 2 14 7 13 13 3 5 5 8 9 5 0 3 11
----------------- 16.3 17.4 20.0 12.5 10.5 14.6 11.1 15.3 35.1 12.5 18.5 10.0 29.6 24.3 14.3 13.0 18.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 26 19 4 3 1 5 4 7 9 2 4 2 4 3 3 0 1 7
8.7 10.0 13.3 3.8 5.3 5.2 6.3 8.2 24.3 8.3 14.8 4.0 14.8 8.1 8.6 4.3 11.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 14 2 7 1 9 3 6 4 1 1 3 4 6 2 0 2 4
7.7 7.4 6.7 8.8 5.3 9.4 4.8 7.1 10.8 4.2 3.7 6.0 14.8 16.2 5.7 8.7 6.6

UNAWARE 101 65 6 30 6 42 24 23 6 11 9 22 7 9 8 10 4 21
------- 33.7 34.2 20.0 37.5 31.6 43.8 38.1 27.1 16.2 45.8 33.3 44.0 25.9 24.3 22.9 62.5 17.4 34.4

NEVER HEARD OF 101 65 6 30 6 42 24 23 6 11 9 22 7 9 8 10 4 21
33.7 34.2 20.0 37.5 31.6 43.8 38.1 27.1 16.2 45.8 33.3 44.0 25.9 24.3 22.9 62.5 17.4 34.4

UNSURE 10 5 1 4 1 5 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 2 2
3.3 2.6 3.3 5.0 5.3 5.2 3.2 2.4 4.0 2.7 8.6 8.7 3.3

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.3 0.5 5.3 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q15. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

MARY ANN GAIDO

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 188 68 18 73 29 33 52 49 71 69 48 10 129 3 23 17 6 0 188 0 94 94
----- 62.7 64.2 50.0 86.9 39.2 63.5 73.2 69.0 80.7 71.9 44.9 58.8 64.8 60.0 63.9 50.0 66.7 62.9 54.0 74.6

FAVORABLE [NET] 76 7 5 59 5 16 11 7 47 51 9 4 58 1 8 4 1 0 76 0 36 40
--------------- 25.3 6.6 13.9 70.2 6.8 30.8 15.5 9.9 53.4 53.1 8.4 23.5 29.1 20.0 22.2 11.8 11.1 25.4 20.7 31.7

VERY FAVORABLE 40 0 4 34 2 5 2 2 31 32 4 2 32 1 3 2 0 0 40 0 14 26
13.3 11.1 40.5 2.7 9.6 2.8 2.8 35.2 33.3 3.7 11.8 16.1 20.0 8.3 5.9 13.4 8.0 20.6

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 36 7 1 25 3 11 9 5 16 19 5 2 26 0 5 2 1 0 36 0 22 14
12.0 6.6 2.8 29.8 4.1 21.2 12.7 7.0 18.2 19.8 4.7 11.8 13.1 13.9 5.9 11.1 12.0 12.6 11.1

NO OPINION 63 27 9 11 16 9 14 15 21 12 26 4 37 1 9 9 3 0 63 0 39 24
21.0 25.5 25.0 13.1 21.6 17.3 19.7 21.1 23.9 12.5 24.3 23.5 18.6 20.0 25.0 26.5 33.3 21.1 22.4 19.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 49 34 4 3 8 8 27 27 3 6 13 2 34 1 6 4 2 0 49 0 19 30
----------------- 16.3 32.1 11.1 3.6 10.8 15.4 38.0 38.0 3.4 6.3 12.1 11.8 17.1 20.0 16.7 11.8 22.2 16.4 10.9 23.8

VERY UNFAVORABLE 26 18 4 0 4 4 16 16 1 2 6 2 17 1 2 2 2 0 26 0 9 17
8.7 17.0 11.1 5.4 7.7 22.5 22.5 1.1 2.1 5.6 11.8 8.5 20.0 5.6 5.9 22.2 8.7 5.2 13.5

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 23 16 0 3 4 4 11 11 2 4 7 0 17 0 4 2 0 0 23 0 10 13
7.7 15.1 3.6 5.4 7.7 15.5 15.5 2.3 4.2 6.5 8.5 11.1 5.9 7.7 5.7 10.3

UNAWARE 101 37 16 9 39 16 17 19 16 24 54 6 62 2 13 16 2 1 100 0 72 29
------- 33.7 34.9 44.4 10.7 52.7 30.8 23.9 26.8 18.2 25.0 50.5 35.3 31.2 40.0 36.1 47.1 22.2 100.0 33.4 41.4 23.0

NEVER HEARD OF 101 37 16 9 39 16 17 19 16 24 54 6 62 2 13 16 2 1 100 0 72 29
33.7 34.9 44.4 10.7 52.7 30.8 23.9 26.8 18.2 25.0 50.5 35.3 31.2 40.0 36.1 47.1 22.2 100.0 33.4 41.4 23.0

UNSURE 10 1 2 2 5 3 2 3 1 3 4 1 8 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 7 3
3.3 0.9 5.6 2.4 6.8 5.8 2.8 4.2 1.1 3.1 3.7 5.9 4.0 2.9 3.3 4.0 2.4

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 11.1 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q16. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

TODD SPITZER

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 157 76 81 70 53 31 61 44 52 124 33 0 15 57 39 46 41 35 31 50
----- 52.3 52.4 52.3 57.4 55.2 43.7 58.7 56.4 44.1 55.1 44.6 29.4 54.3 58.2 59.7 48.2 58.3 43.7 59.5

FAVORABLE [NET] 48 23 25 39 6 3 34 4 10 42 6 0 0 17 8 23 10 13 7 18
--------------- 16.0 15.9 16.1 32.0 6.3 4.2 32.7 5.1 8.5 18.7 8.1 16.2 11.9 29.9 11.8 21.7 9.9 21.4

VERY FAVORABLE 18 12 6 15 1 2 14 1 3 15 3 0 0 9 3 6 6 6 3 3
6.0 8.3 3.9 12.3 1.0 2.8 13.5 1.3 2.5 6.7 4.1 8.6 4.5 7.8 7.1 10.0 4.2 3.6

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 30 11 19 24 5 1 20 3 7 27 3 0 0 8 5 17 4 7 4 15
10.0 7.6 12.3 19.7 5.2 1.4 19.2 3.8 5.9 12.0 4.1 7.6 7.5 22.1 4.7 11.7 5.6 17.9

NO OPINION 74 35 39 24 29 20 21 25 28 52 22 0 12 29 19 14 24 11 17 22
24.7 24.1 25.2 19.7 30.2 28.2 20.2 32.1 23.7 23.1 29.7 23.5 27.6 28.4 18.2 28.2 18.3 23.9 26.2

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 18 17 7 18 8 6 15 14 30 5 0 3 11 12 9 7 11 7 10
----------------- 11.7 12.4 11.0 5.7 18.8 11.3 5.8 19.2 11.9 13.3 6.8 5.9 10.5 17.9 11.7 8.2 18.3 9.9 11.9

VERY UNFAVORABLE 15 11 4 3 6 6 3 6 6 10 5 0 2 4 5 4 5 6 1 3
5.0 7.6 2.6 2.5 6.3 8.5 2.9 7.7 5.1 4.4 6.8 3.9 3.8 7.5 5.2 5.9 10.0 1.4 3.6

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 7 13 4 12 2 3 9 8 20 0 0 1 7 7 5 2 5 6 7
6.7 4.8 8.4 3.3 12.5 2.8 2.9 11.5 6.8 8.9 2.0 6.7 10.4 6.5 2.4 8.3 8.5 8.3

UNAWARE 130 66 64 47 38 38 38 29 63 92 37 1 35 45 25 25 42 24 38 26
------- 43.3 45.5 41.3 38.5 39.6 53.5 36.5 37.2 53.4 40.9 50.0 100.0 68.6 42.9 37.3 32.5 49.4 40.0 53.5 31.0

NEVER HEARD OF 130 66 64 47 38 38 38 29 63 92 37 1 35 45 25 25 42 24 38 26
43.3 45.5 41.3 38.5 39.6 53.5 36.5 37.2 53.4 40.9 50.0 100.0 68.6 42.9 37.3 32.5 49.4 40.0 53.5 31.0

UNSURE 10 3 7 3 4 2 3 4 3 7 3 0 1 2 3 4 2 1 1 6
3.3 2.1 4.5 2.5 4.2 2.8 2.9 5.1 2.5 3.1 4.1 2.0 1.9 4.5 5.2 2.4 1.7 1.4 7.1

REFUSED 3 0 3 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2
1.0 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q16. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

TODD SPITZER

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 157 30 40 23 8 22 31 27 43 17 14 25 28 59 24 23 33 13 0 5 0
----- 52.3 51.7 62.5 50.0 32.0 62.9 50.8 56.3 58.1 36.2 58.3 49.0 62.2 68.6 60.0 53.5 44.6 29.5 50.0

FAVORABLE [NET] 48 18 21 3 0 2 4 11 28 1 2 5 1 26 6 6 6 3 0 1 0
--------------- 16.0 31.0 32.8 6.5 5.7 6.6 22.9 37.8 2.1 8.3 9.8 2.2 30.2 15.0 14.0 8.1 6.8 10.0

VERY FAVORABLE 18 10 5 2 0 0 1 7 8 1 1 1 0 7 2 3 4 1 0 1 0
6.0 17.2 7.8 4.3 1.6 14.6 10.8 2.1 4.2 2.0 8.1 5.0 7.0 5.4 2.3 10.0

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 30 8 16 1 0 2 3 4 20 0 1 4 1 19 4 3 2 2 0 0 0
10.0 13.8 25.0 2.2 5.7 4.9 8.3 27.0 4.2 7.8 2.2 22.1 10.0 7.0 2.7 4.5

NO OPINION 74 9 15 14 6 12 17 12 12 12 8 16 13 18 12 13 21 7 0 3 0
24.7 15.5 23.4 30.4 24.0 34.3 27.9 25.0 16.2 25.5 33.3 31.4 28.9 20.9 30.0 30.2 28.4 15.9 30.0

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 3 4 6 2 8 10 4 3 4 4 4 14 15 6 4 6 3 0 1 0
----------------- 11.7 5.2 6.3 13.0 8.0 22.9 16.4 8.3 4.1 8.5 16.7 7.8 31.1 17.4 15.0 9.3 8.1 6.8 10.0

VERY UNFAVORABLE 15 3 0 4 2 4 2 2 1 3 3 1 5 5 3 2 2 3 0 0 0
5.0 5.2 8.7 8.0 11.4 3.3 4.2 1.4 6.4 12.5 2.0 11.1 5.8 7.5 4.7 2.7 6.8

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 0 4 2 0 4 8 2 2 1 1 3 9 10 3 2 4 0 0 1 0
6.7 6.3 4.3 11.4 13.1 4.2 2.7 2.1 4.2 5.9 20.0 11.6 7.5 4.7 5.4 10.0

UNAWARE 130 27 20 21 17 13 25 20 27 28 10 25 13 20 15 18 40 29 3 5 0
------- 43.3 46.6 31.3 45.7 68.0 37.1 41.0 41.7 36.5 59.6 41.7 49.0 28.9 23.3 37.5 41.9 54.1 65.9 100.0 50.0

NEVER HEARD OF 130 27 20 21 17 13 25 20 27 28 10 25 13 20 15 18 40 29 3 5 0
43.3 46.6 31.3 45.7 68.0 37.1 41.0 41.7 36.5 59.6 41.7 49.0 28.9 23.3 37.5 41.9 54.1 65.9 100.0 50.0

UNSURE 10 1 2 2 0 0 4 0 3 2 0 1 3 5 1 2 1 1 0 0 0
3.3 1.7 3.1 4.3 6.6 4.1 4.3 2.0 6.7 5.8 2.5 4.7 1.4 2.3

REFUSED 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
1.0 3.1 1.6 2.1 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q16. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

TODD SPITZER

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 157 102 21 34 4 49 31 51 22 12 11 27 16 20 20 6 11 34
----- 52.3 53.7 70.0 42.5 21.1 51.0 49.2 60.0 59.5 50.0 40.7 54.0 59.3 54.1 57.1 37.5 47.8 55.7

FAVORABLE [NET] 48 33 8 7 1 7 9 18 13 6 2 8 6 5 4 0 3 14
--------------- 16.0 17.4 26.7 8.8 5.3 7.3 14.3 21.2 35.1 25.0 7.4 16.0 22.2 13.5 11.4 13.0 23.0

VERY FAVORABLE 18 13 4 1 1 3 4 7 3 2 0 3 1 3 2 0 2 5
6.0 6.8 13.3 1.3 5.3 3.1 6.3 8.2 8.1 8.3 6.0 3.7 8.1 5.7 8.7 8.2

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 30 20 4 6 0 4 5 11 10 4 2 5 5 2 2 0 1 9
10.0 10.5 13.3 7.5 4.2 7.9 12.9 27.0 16.7 7.4 10.0 18.5 5.4 5.7 4.3 14.8

NO OPINION 74 44 8 22 2 31 16 19 6 3 8 15 10 10 5 3 8 12
24.7 23.2 26.7 27.5 10.5 32.3 25.4 22.4 16.2 12.5 29.6 30.0 37.0 27.0 14.3 18.8 34.8 19.7

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 25 5 5 1 11 6 14 3 3 1 4 0 5 11 3 0 8
----------------- 11.7 13.2 16.7 6.3 5.3 11.5 9.5 16.5 8.1 12.5 3.7 8.0 13.5 31.4 18.8 13.1

VERY UNFAVORABLE 15 13 1 1 0 7 2 5 1 1 1 2 0 4 3 2 0 2
5.0 6.8 3.3 1.3 7.3 3.2 5.9 2.7 4.2 3.7 4.0 10.8 8.6 12.5 3.3

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 12 4 4 1 4 4 9 2 2 0 2 0 1 8 1 0 6
6.7 6.3 13.3 5.0 5.3 4.2 6.3 10.6 5.4 8.3 4.0 2.7 22.9 6.3 9.8

UNAWARE 130 79 8 43 14 46 27 33 10 12 12 21 11 16 12 10 11 25
------- 43.3 41.6 26.7 53.8 73.7 47.9 42.9 38.8 27.0 50.0 44.4 42.0 40.7 43.2 34.3 62.5 47.8 41.0

NEVER HEARD OF 130 79 8 43 14 46 27 33 10 12 12 21 11 16 12 10 11 25
43.3 41.6 26.7 53.8 73.7 47.9 42.9 38.8 27.0 50.0 44.4 42.0 40.7 43.2 34.3 62.5 47.8 41.0

UNSURE 10 7 0 3 0 1 4 1 4 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 2
3.3 3.7 3.8 1.0 6.3 1.2 10.8 11.1 4.0 2.7 5.7 3.3

REFUSED 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
1.0 1.1 3.3 5.3 1.6 2.7 3.7 2.9 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q16. Now I have a list of names of several individuals and organizations that I am going to read. For each name, please tell me if you have heard of them and if you have a
favorable or unfavorable opinion of them. If you have no opinion or have never heard of them, just say so. The first name is _____. Have you heard of ______? Would you say
that you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of _____? And would you say that your opinion is somewhat or very (favorable/unfavorable)?

TODD SPITZER

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

AWARE 157 70 13 45 29 26 46 47 44 44 52 10 106 2 14 19 6 1 156 0 75 82
----- 52.3 66.0 36.1 53.6 39.2 50.0 64.8 66.2 50.0 45.8 48.6 58.8 53.3 40.0 38.9 55.9 66.7 100.0 52.2 43.1 65.1

FAVORABLE [NET] 48 35 3 9 1 8 20 30 10 8 10 3 38 1 1 4 1 0 48 0 13 35
--------------- 16.0 33.0 8.3 10.7 1.4 15.4 28.2 42.3 11.4 8.3 9.3 17.6 19.1 20.0 2.8 11.8 11.1 16.1 7.5 27.8

VERY FAVORABLE 18 14 2 2 0 1 10 12 3 2 4 1 14 1 0 2 0 0 18 0 5 13
6.0 13.2 5.6 2.4 1.9 14.1 16.9 3.4 2.1 3.7 5.9 7.0 20.0 5.9 6.0 2.9 10.3

SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 30 21 1 7 1 7 10 18 7 6 6 2 24 0 1 2 1 0 30 0 8 22
10.0 19.8 2.8 8.3 1.4 13.5 14.1 25.4 8.0 6.3 5.6 11.8 12.1 2.8 5.9 11.1 10.0 4.6 17.5

NO OPINION 74 27 8 19 20 12 17 14 22 20 31 5 45 0 11 10 3 1 73 0 38 36
24.7 25.5 22.2 22.6 27.0 23.1 23.9 19.7 25.0 20.8 29.0 29.4 22.6 30.6 29.4 33.3 100.0 24.4 21.8 28.6

UNFAVORABLE [NET] 35 8 2 17 8 6 9 3 12 16 11 2 23 1 2 5 2 0 35 0 24 11
----------------- 11.7 7.5 5.6 20.2 10.8 11.5 12.7 4.2 13.6 16.7 10.3 11.8 11.6 20.0 5.6 14.7 22.2 11.7 13.8 8.7

VERY UNFAVORABLE 15 3 1 8 3 2 4 1 6 6 5 1 8 1 1 4 0 0 15 0 12 3
5.0 2.8 2.8 9.5 4.1 3.8 5.6 1.4 6.8 6.3 4.7 5.9 4.0 20.0 2.8 11.8 5.0 6.9 2.4

SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 20 5 1 9 5 4 5 2 6 10 6 1 15 0 1 1 2 0 20 0 12 8
6.7 4.7 2.8 10.7 6.8 7.7 7.0 2.8 6.8 10.4 5.6 5.9 7.5 2.8 2.9 22.2 6.7 6.9 6.3

UNAWARE 130 34 22 32 42 23 24 22 37 44 53 7 84 3 20 14 2 0 130 0 91 39
------- 43.3 32.1 61.1 38.1 56.8 44.2 33.8 31.0 42.0 45.8 49.5 41.2 42.2 60.0 55.6 41.2 22.2 43.5 52.3 31.0

NEVER HEARD OF 130 34 22 32 42 23 24 22 37 44 53 7 84 3 20 14 2 0 130 0 91 39
43.3 32.1 61.1 38.1 56.8 44.2 33.8 31.0 42.0 45.8 49.5 41.2 42.2 60.0 55.6 41.2 22.2 43.5 52.3 31.0

UNSURE 10 2 1 5 2 2 1 2 5 7 1 0 7 0 2 1 0 0 10 0 6 4
3.3 1.9 2.8 6.0 2.7 3.8 1.4 2.8 5.7 7.3 0.9 3.5 5.6 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.2

REFUSED 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 2.4 1.4 1.9 2.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 11.1 1.0 1.1 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q17. Now I am going to read a list of several issues that may be facing your community. Please listen to each and then tell me which THREE issues should be the top priorities
of your mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 143 64 79 59 45 35 50 36 57 101 41 1 23 51 35 34 38 26 36 43
47.7 44.1 51.0 48.4 46.9 49.3 48.1 46.2 48.3 44.9 55.4 100.0 45.1 48.6 52.2 44.2 44.7 43.3 50.7 51.2

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 142 63 79 51 50 35 45 36 61 109 33 0 28 51 29 34 41 22 38 41
47.3 43.4 51.0 41.8 52.1 49.3 43.3 46.2 51.7 48.4 44.6 54.9 48.6 43.3 44.2 48.2 36.7 53.5 48.8

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 47 73 44 50 20 38 40 42 97 22 1 15 39 30 36 22 25 32 41
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 32.4 47.1 36.1 52.1 28.2 36.5 51.3 35.6 43.1 29.7 100.0 29.4 37.1 44.8 46.8 25.9 41.7 45.1 48.8

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 83 49 34 33 30 15 28 25 30 62 20 1 10 30 18 25 26 23 14 20
27.7 33.8 21.9 27.0 31.3 21.1 26.9 32.1 25.4 27.6 27.0 100.0 19.6 28.6 26.9 32.5 30.6 38.3 19.7 23.8

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 77 31 46 12 34 29 11 26 40 50 27 0 23 25 16 13 21 10 27 19
25.7 21.4 29.7 9.8 35.4 40.8 10.6 33.3 33.9 22.2 36.5 45.1 23.8 23.9 16.9 24.7 16.7 38.0 22.6

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 64 38 26 28 12 21 27 11 26 41 23 0 13 27 13 11 28 10 12 14
21.3 26.2 16.8 23.0 12.5 29.6 26.0 14.1 22.0 18.2 31.1 25.5 25.7 19.4 14.3 32.9 16.7 16.9 16.7

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 53 22 31 14 21 17 11 20 22 40 13 0 7 19 11 16 13 9 13 18
17.7 15.2 20.0 11.5 21.9 23.9 10.6 25.6 18.6 17.8 17.6 13.7 18.1 16.4 20.8 15.3 15.0 18.3 21.4

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 50 26 24 31 7 10 24 6 20 39 11 0 7 18 9 16 15 11 10 14
16.7 17.9 15.5 25.4 7.3 14.1 23.1 7.7 16.9 17.3 14.9 13.7 17.1 13.4 20.8 17.6 18.3 14.1 16.7

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 49 20 29 25 11 12 22 9 18 35 14 0 8 17 14 10 10 10 15 14
GRAFFITI 16.3 13.8 18.7 20.5 11.5 16.9 21.2 11.5 15.3 15.6 18.9 15.7 16.2 20.9 13.0 11.8 16.7 21.1 16.7

GOVERNMENT WORKER PENSION 29 20 9 20 3 4 18 2 9 24 5 0 3 10 5 11 11 9 2 7
REFORM 9.7 13.8 5.8 16.4 3.1 5.6 17.3 2.6 7.6 10.7 6.8 5.9 9.5 7.5 14.3 12.9 15.0 2.8 8.3

PARKS AND RECREATION 25 17 8 14 8 3 12 8 5 21 4 0 4 11 7 3 10 7 5 3
8.3 11.7 5.2 11.5 8.3 4.2 11.5 10.3 4.2 9.3 5.4 7.8 10.5 10.4 3.9 11.8 11.7 7.0 3.6

CITY TAXES OR FEES 23 16 7 13 4 5 8 3 12 19 4 0 6 8 7 2 10 6 4 3
7.7 11.0 4.5 10.7 4.2 7.0 7.7 3.8 10.2 8.4 5.4 11.8 7.6 10.4 2.6 11.8 10.0 5.6 3.6

CITY STREET AND SIDEWALK 19 7 12 10 5 4 9 4 6 16 3 0 2 7 2 8 4 3 5 7
REPAIR 6.3 4.8 7.7 8.2 5.2 5.6 8.7 5.1 5.1 7.1 4.1 3.9 6.7 3.0 10.4 4.7 5.0 7.0 8.3

OTHER 4 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1
1.3 2.1 0.6 0.8 2.1 1.4 1.0 2.6 0.8 1.3 1.4 2.0 3.0 1.3 1.2 3.3 1.2

UNSURE 5 3 2 3 2 0 2 2 1 5 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 2 0 2
1.7 2.1 1.3 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.6 0.8 2.2 2.0 1.5 3.9 1.2 3.3 2.4

REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q17. Now I am going to read a list of several issues that may be facing your community. Please listen to each and then tell me which THREE issues should be the top priorities
of your mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 143 25 34 21 14 16 29 22 37 24 11 25 20 41 18 22 37 20 0 5 0
47.7 43.1 53.1 45.7 56.0 45.7 47.5 45.8 50.0 51.1 45.8 49.0 44.4 47.7 45.0 51.2 50.0 45.5 50.0

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 142 22 29 20 15 18 32 25 26 22 13 27 23 34 21 22 33 23 3 6 0
47.3 37.9 45.3 43.5 60.0 51.4 52.5 52.1 35.1 46.8 54.2 52.9 51.1 39.5 52.5 51.2 44.6 52.3 100.0 60.0

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 18 26 11 9 16 34 16 28 13 7 20 30 41 17 17 23 17 2 3 0
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 31.0 40.6 23.9 36.0 45.7 55.7 33.3 37.8 27.7 29.2 39.2 66.7 47.7 42.5 39.5 31.1 38.6 66.7 30.0

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 83 16 17 13 2 18 12 13 20 10 5 12 18 26 9 17 20 9 0 2 0
27.7 27.6 26.6 28.3 8.0 51.4 19.7 27.1 27.0 21.3 20.8 23.5 40.0 30.2 22.5 39.5 27.0 20.5 20.0

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 77 8 4 16 13 6 28 8 4 18 11 20 14 14 6 11 22 20 1 3 0
25.7 13.8 6.3 34.8 52.0 17.1 45.9 16.7 5.4 38.3 45.8 39.2 31.1 16.3 15.0 25.6 29.7 45.5 33.3 30.0

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 64 13 15 16 5 7 5 14 14 15 6 8 4 13 8 9 23 7 1 3 0
21.3 22.4 23.4 34.8 20.0 20.0 8.2 29.2 18.9 31.9 25.0 15.7 8.9 15.1 20.0 20.9 31.1 15.9 33.3 30.0

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 53 5 9 8 9 8 13 5 9 9 8 11 10 15 6 5 20 3 1 3 0
17.7 8.6 14.1 17.4 36.0 22.9 21.3 10.4 12.2 19.1 33.3 21.6 22.2 17.4 15.0 11.6 27.0 6.8 33.3 30.0

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 50 15 16 9 1 1 6 8 23 9 1 6 1 18 8 8 9 6 0 1 0
16.7 25.9 25.0 19.6 4.0 2.9 9.8 16.7 31.1 19.1 4.2 11.8 2.2 20.9 20.0 18.6 12.2 13.6 10.0

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 49 10 15 7 5 2 9 9 16 9 3 6 5 13 8 6 15 5 0 2 0
GRAFFITI 16.3 17.2 23.4 15.2 20.0 5.7 14.8 18.8 21.6 19.1 12.5 11.8 11.1 15.1 20.0 14.0 20.3 11.4 20.0

GOVERNMENT WORKER PENSION 29 13 7 4 0 1 2 8 12 3 1 0 3 11 9 3 3 2 0 1 0
REFORM 9.7 22.4 10.9 8.7 2.9 3.3 16.7 16.2 6.4 4.2 6.7 12.8 22.5 7.0 4.1 4.5 10.0

PARKS AND RECREATION 25 9 5 3 0 5 3 6 8 2 1 7 1 5 3 5 6 6 0 0 0
8.3 15.5 7.8 6.5 14.3 4.9 12.5 10.8 4.3 4.2 13.7 2.2 5.8 7.5 11.6 8.1 13.6

CITY TAXES OR FEES 23 9 4 5 0 1 3 6 7 4 1 3 1 4 4 3 6 5 1 0 0
7.7 15.5 6.3 10.9 2.9 4.9 12.5 9.5 8.5 4.2 5.9 2.2 4.7 10.0 7.0 8.1 11.4 33.3

CITY STREET AND SIDEWALK 19 4 6 2 2 1 4 4 6 1 3 4 1 8 2 1 1 6 0 1 0
REPAIR 6.3 6.9 9.4 4.3 8.0 2.9 6.6 8.3 8.1 2.1 12.5 7.8 2.2 9.3 5.0 2.3 1.4 13.6 10.0

OTHER 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0
1.3 1.6 2.2 5.7 1.4 4.2 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.5 2.7

UNSURE 5 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
1.7 3.4 1.6 2.9 1.6 4.1 2.0 2.2 4.7 2.3

REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q17. Now I am going to read a list of several issues that may be facing your community. Please listen to each and then tell me which THREE issues should be the top priorities
of your mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 143 90 13 40 10 44 28 42 19 10 15 23 11 16 18 9 11 30
47.7 47.4 43.3 50.0 52.6 45.8 44.4 49.4 51.4 41.7 55.6 46.0 40.7 43.2 51.4 56.3 47.8 49.2

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 142 85 13 44 9 51 31 38 13 17 11 28 12 12 17 9 10 26
47.3 44.7 43.3 55.0 47.4 53.1 49.2 44.7 35.1 70.8 40.7 56.0 44.4 32.4 48.6 56.3 43.5 42.6

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 81 14 25 9 30 21 41 19 8 11 21 10 16 17 4 7 26
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 42.6 46.7 31.3 47.4 31.3 33.3 48.2 51.4 33.3 40.7 42.0 37.0 43.2 48.6 25.0 30.4 42.6

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 83 47 9 27 1 28 19 22 13 2 11 11 6 11 6 1 10 25
27.7 24.7 30.0 33.8 5.3 29.2 30.2 25.9 35.1 8.3 40.7 22.0 22.2 29.7 17.1 6.3 43.5 41.0

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 77 55 3 19 6 30 20 17 4 11 6 9 6 8 7 7 5 18
25.7 28.9 10.0 23.8 31.6 31.3 31.7 20.0 10.8 45.8 22.2 18.0 22.2 21.6 20.0 43.8 21.7 29.5

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 64 44 5 15 8 25 14 12 5 6 5 12 7 9 7 5 4 9
21.3 23.2 16.7 18.8 42.1 26.0 22.2 14.1 13.5 25.0 18.5 24.0 25.9 24.3 20.0 31.3 17.4 14.8

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 53 29 7 17 5 11 12 20 5 3 6 7 4 8 6 4 5 10
17.7 15.3 23.3 21.3 26.3 11.5 19.0 23.5 13.5 12.5 22.2 14.0 14.8 21.6 17.1 25.0 21.7 16.4

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 50 27 8 15 2 16 10 13 9 2 4 6 7 9 4 2 6 10
16.7 14.2 26.7 18.8 10.5 16.7 15.9 15.3 24.3 8.3 14.8 12.0 25.9 24.3 11.4 12.5 26.1 16.4

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 49 26 8 15 1 17 9 14 8 5 3 9 7 6 7 1 2 9
GRAFFITI 16.3 13.7 26.7 18.8 5.3 17.7 14.3 16.5 21.6 20.8 11.1 18.0 25.9 16.2 20.0 6.3 8.7 14.8

GOVERNMENT WORKER PENSION 29 21 2 6 3 8 5 7 6 4 2 2 3 3 8 0 0 7
REFORM 9.7 11.1 6.7 7.5 15.8 8.3 7.9 8.2 16.2 16.7 7.4 4.0 11.1 8.1 22.9 11.5

PARKS AND RECREATION 25 19 3 3 1 13 5 5 1 2 1 3 1 3 5 1 5 4
8.3 10.0 10.0 3.8 5.3 13.5 7.9 5.9 2.7 8.3 3.7 6.0 3.7 8.1 14.3 6.3 21.7 6.6

CITY TAXES OR FEES 23 16 0 7 2 5 4 10 2 1 1 3 4 4 3 1 2 4
7.7 8.4 8.8 10.5 5.2 6.3 11.8 5.4 4.2 3.7 6.0 14.8 10.8 8.6 6.3 8.7 6.6

CITY STREET AND SIDEWALK 19 13 2 4 0 6 4 5 4 1 2 4 3 3 0 1 2 3
REPAIR 6.3 6.8 6.7 5.0 6.3 6.3 5.9 10.8 4.2 7.4 8.0 11.1 8.1 6.3 8.7 4.9

OTHER 4 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
1.3 3.3 3.8 1.0 3.2 2.7 5.4 3.3

UNSURE 5 5 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0
1.7 2.6 1.0 1.6 3.5 3.7 6.0 6.3

REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q17. Now I am going to read a list of several issues that may be facing your community. Please listen to each and then tell me which THREE issues should be the top priorities
of your mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 143 42 18 46 37 27 29 33 42 49 51 6 93 4 19 14 7 1 142 0 79 64
47.7 39.6 50.0 54.8 50.0 51.9 40.8 46.5 47.7 51.0 47.7 35.3 46.7 80.0 52.8 41.2 77.8 100.0 47.5 45.4 50.8

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 142 52 16 36 38 19 37 27 45 47 53 12 88 2 19 18 3 0 142 0 85 57
47.3 49.1 44.4 42.9 51.4 36.5 52.1 38.0 51.1 49.0 49.5 70.6 44.2 40.0 52.8 52.9 33.3 47.5 48.9 45.2

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 20 19 51 30 21 22 24 46 49 37 5 90 4 11 7 3 0 120 0 66 54
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 18.9 52.8 60.7 40.5 40.4 31.0 33.8 52.3 51.0 34.6 29.4 45.2 80.0 30.6 20.6 33.3 40.1 37.9 42.9

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 83 32 8 27 16 14 20 27 25 25 27 5 58 0 8 9 3 1 82 0 42 41
27.7 30.2 22.2 32.1 21.6 26.9 28.2 38.0 28.4 26.0 25.2 29.4 29.1 22.2 26.5 33.3 100.0 27.4 24.1 32.5

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 77 17 12 25 23 16 11 12 29 28 28 5 43 1 13 13 2 0 77 0 56 21
25.7 16.0 33.3 29.8 31.1 30.8 15.5 16.9 33.0 29.2 26.2 29.4 21.6 20.0 36.1 38.2 22.2 25.8 32.2 16.7

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 64 31 4 11 18 9 17 12 19 14 28 1 41 0 12 8 2 0 64 0 46 18
21.3 29.2 11.1 13.1 24.3 17.3 23.9 16.9 21.6 14.6 26.2 5.9 20.6 33.3 23.5 22.2 21.4 26.4 14.3

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 53 15 6 22 10 10 9 7 23 24 16 4 38 1 4 5 1 1 52 0 29 24
17.7 14.2 16.7 26.2 13.5 19.2 12.7 9.9 26.1 25.0 15.0 23.5 19.1 20.0 11.1 14.7 11.1 100.0 17.4 16.7 19.0

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 50 31 6 7 6 11 21 23 5 8 15 3 36 0 5 5 1 0 50 0 22 28
16.7 29.2 16.7 8.3 8.1 21.2 29.6 32.4 5.7 8.3 14.0 17.6 18.1 13.9 14.7 11.1 16.7 12.6 22.2

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 49 23 6 10 10 10 16 14 7 13 18 4 29 0 7 8 1 0 49 0 26 23
GRAFFITI 16.3 21.7 16.7 11.9 13.5 19.2 22.5 19.7 8.0 13.5 16.8 23.5 14.6 19.4 23.5 11.1 16.4 14.9 18.3

GOVERNMENT WORKER PENSION 29 17 2 6 4 7 11 15 4 5 8 2 19 0 5 2 1 0 29 0 19 10
REFORM 9.7 16.0 5.6 7.1 5.4 13.5 15.5 21.1 4.5 5.2 7.5 11.8 9.5 13.9 5.9 11.1 9.7 10.9 7.9

PARKS AND RECREATION 25 8 2 6 9 5 6 3 5 9 11 1 16 2 2 3 1 0 25 0 17 8
8.3 7.5 5.6 7.1 12.2 9.6 8.5 4.2 5.7 9.4 10.3 5.9 8.0 40.0 5.6 8.8 11.1 8.4 9.8 6.3

CITY TAXES OR FEES 23 10 6 3 4 3 7 5 3 8 10 0 17 0 1 5 0 0 23 0 11 12
7.7 9.4 16.7 3.6 5.4 5.8 9.9 7.0 3.4 8.3 9.3 8.5 2.8 14.7 7.7 6.3 9.5

CITY STREET AND SIDEWALK 19 9 3 1 6 2 5 5 5 4 8 3 11 0 2 2 1 0 19 0 7 12
REPAIR 6.3 8.5 8.3 1.2 8.1 3.8 7.0 7.0 5.7 4.2 7.5 17.6 5.5 5.6 5.9 11.1 6.4 4.0 9.5

OTHER 4 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 3 1
1.3 1.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 3.4 2.1 0.9 0.5 20.0 2.9 11.1 1.3 1.7 0.8

UNSURE 5 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 1
1.7 1.9 4.1 1.4 1.1 1.0 2.8 2.5 1.7 2.3 0.8

REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q18. Please listen to the following list of issues and and then tell me which TWO issues are most important to you when you're voting for Irvine mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 46 74 41 53 22 34 40 46 94 26 0 15 36 36 33 20 26 31 43
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 31.7 47.7 33.6 55.2 31.0 32.7 51.3 39.0 41.8 35.1 29.4 34.3 53.7 42.9 23.5 43.3 43.7 51.2

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 97 44 53 35 32 24 28 21 48 77 20 0 19 45 17 16 33 11 31 22
32.3 30.3 34.2 28.7 33.3 33.8 26.9 26.9 40.7 34.2 27.0 37.3 42.9 25.4 20.8 38.8 18.3 43.7 26.2

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 84 41 43 40 27 17 33 23 28 60 23 1 11 24 24 25 21 20 14 29
28.0 28.3 27.7 32.8 28.1 23.9 31.7 29.5 23.7 26.7 31.1 100.0 21.6 22.9 35.8 32.5 24.7 33.3 19.7 34.5

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 61 39 22 27 19 11 24 16 21 45 15 1 6 22 14 19 19 20 9 13
20.3 26.9 14.2 22.1 19.8 15.5 23.1 20.5 17.8 20.0 20.3 100.0 11.8 21.0 20.9 24.7 22.4 33.3 12.7 15.5

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 54 30 24 32 7 12 27 6 21 45 9 0 11 23 7 13 22 8 12 12
18.0 20.7 15.5 26.2 7.3 16.9 26.0 7.7 17.8 20.0 12.2 21.6 21.9 10.4 16.9 25.9 13.3 16.9 14.3

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 52 33 19 21 9 20 18 7 27 28 24 0 11 21 11 9 23 10 9 10
17.3 22.8 12.3 17.2 9.4 28.2 17.3 9.0 22.9 12.4 32.4 21.6 20.0 16.4 11.7 27.1 16.7 12.7 11.9

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 52 23 29 13 16 20 13 15 24 36 16 0 17 15 9 11 14 9 18 11
17.3 15.9 18.7 10.7 16.7 28.2 12.5 19.2 20.3 16.0 21.6 33.3 14.3 13.4 14.3 16.5 15.0 25.4 13.1

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 36 13 23 21 8 7 19 8 9 24 12 0 4 12 11 9 6 7 10 13
GRAFFITI 12.0 9.0 14.8 17.2 8.3 9.9 18.3 10.3 7.6 10.7 16.2 7.8 11.4 16.4 11.7 7.1 11.7 14.1 15.5

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 27 12 15 2 17 8 2 16 9 24 3 0 7 11 2 7 10 2 8 7
9.0 8.3 9.7 1.6 17.7 11.3 1.9 20.5 7.6 10.7 4.1 13.7 10.5 3.0 9.1 11.8 3.3 11.3 8.3

OTHER 4 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1
1.3 2.1 0.6 0.8 2.1 1.4 1.0 2.6 0.8 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.3 2.4 1.7 1.2

UNSURE 5 3 2 4 1 0 3 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 3 0 2
1.7 2.1 1.3 3.3 1.0 2.9 1.3 0.8 2.2 1.5 5.2 5.0 2.4

REFUSED 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.4 1.3 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q18. Please listen to the following list of issues and and then tell me which TWO issues are most important to you when you're voting for Irvine mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 18 23 14 8 13 40 11 30 14 8 23 30 37 17 20 28 15 0 3 0
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 31.0 35.9 30.4 32.0 37.1 65.6 22.9 40.5 29.8 33.3 45.1 66.7 43.0 42.5 46.5 37.8 34.1 30.0

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 97 16 19 12 12 12 20 24 11 16 8 19 13 19 13 14 25 19 2 5 0
32.3 27.6 29.7 26.1 48.0 34.3 32.8 50.0 14.9 34.0 33.3 37.3 28.9 22.1 32.5 32.6 33.8 43.2 66.7 50.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 84 20 20 11 6 10 17 11 29 11 6 13 14 29 12 11 17 13 1 1 0
28.0 34.5 31.3 23.9 24.0 28.6 27.9 22.9 39.2 23.4 25.0 25.5 31.1 33.7 30.0 25.6 23.0 29.5 33.3 10.0

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 61 13 14 10 1 14 5 10 17 5 6 9 10 19 6 12 16 6 0 2 0
20.3 22.4 21.9 21.7 4.0 40.0 8.2 20.8 23.0 10.6 25.0 17.6 22.2 22.1 15.0 27.9 21.6 13.6 20.0

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 54 16 16 10 2 2 5 14 18 11 1 6 1 18 10 6 11 8 1 0 0
18.0 27.6 25.0 21.7 8.0 5.7 8.2 29.2 24.3 23.4 4.2 11.8 2.2 20.9 25.0 14.0 14.9 18.2 33.3

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 52 12 9 16 4 4 5 11 10 14 6 5 4 12 7 5 18 8 0 2 0
17.3 20.7 14.1 34.8 16.0 11.4 8.2 22.9 13.5 29.8 25.0 9.8 8.9 14.0 17.5 11.6 24.3 18.2 20.0

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 52 7 6 10 10 4 12 7 6 13 7 9 7 10 4 7 13 12 2 4 0
17.3 12.1 9.4 21.7 40.0 11.4 19.7 14.6 8.1 27.7 29.2 17.6 15.6 11.6 10.0 16.3 17.6 27.3 66.7 40.0

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 36 8 13 4 3 1 7 7 14 3 4 6 2 8 5 8 12 3 0 0 0
GRAFFITI 12.0 13.8 20.3 8.7 12.0 2.9 11.5 14.6 18.9 6.4 16.7 11.8 4.4 9.3 12.5 18.6 16.2 6.8

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 27 0 2 4 4 8 9 1 1 7 1 10 7 8 4 2 7 3 0 3 0
9.0 3.1 8.7 16.0 22.9 14.8 2.1 1.4 14.9 4.2 19.6 15.6 9.3 10.0 4.7 9.5 6.8 30.0

OTHER 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
1.3 1.6 2.2 5.7 1.4 4.2 3.9 1.2 2.3 1.4 2.3

UNSURE 5 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.7 5.2 1.6 1.6 5.4 2.2 4.7 2.5

REFUSED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.6 1.4 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q18. Please listen to the following list of issues and and then tell me which TWO issues are most important to you when you're voting for Irvine mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 75 13 32 4 29 24 46 17 12 13 16 8 14 18 3 9 27
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 39.5 43.3 40.0 21.1 30.2 38.1 54.1 45.9 50.0 48.1 32.0 29.6 37.8 51.4 18.8 39.1 44.3

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 97 56 6 35 6 41 18 26 6 8 8 20 5 12 11 6 8 19
32.3 29.5 20.0 43.8 31.6 42.7 28.6 30.6 16.2 33.3 29.6 40.0 18.5 32.4 31.4 37.5 34.8 31.1

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 84 56 11 17 6 25 17 21 15 3 4 16 6 10 14 4 6 21
28.0 29.5 36.7 21.3 31.6 26.0 27.0 24.7 40.5 12.5 14.8 32.0 22.2 27.0 40.0 25.0 26.1 34.4

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 61 37 6 18 1 18 12 16 14 3 8 9 5 9 3 2 7 15
20.3 19.5 20.0 22.5 5.3 18.8 19.0 18.8 37.8 12.5 29.6 18.0 18.5 24.3 8.6 12.5 30.4 24.6

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 54 28 8 18 3 18 12 16 5 4 7 6 8 8 4 2 3 12
18.0 14.7 26.7 22.5 15.8 18.8 19.0 18.8 13.5 16.7 25.9 12.0 29.6 21.6 11.4 12.5 13.0 19.7

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 52 36 6 10 6 19 11 12 4 9 3 8 6 7 6 3 2 8
17.3 18.9 20.0 12.5 31.6 19.8 17.5 14.1 10.8 37.5 11.1 16.0 22.2 18.9 17.1 18.8 8.7 13.1

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 52 38 1 13 7 21 10 10 4 6 5 7 7 5 3 7 3 9
17.3 20.0 3.3 16.3 36.8 21.9 15.9 11.8 10.8 25.0 18.5 14.0 25.9 13.5 8.6 43.8 13.0 14.8

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 36 20 6 10 3 10 10 10 3 2 1 6 6 4 7 0 1 9
GRAFFITI 12.0 10.5 20.0 12.5 15.8 10.4 15.9 11.8 8.1 8.3 3.7 12.0 22.2 10.8 20.0 4.3 14.8

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 27 18 2 7 2 10 8 7 0 1 3 2 1 5 2 4 7 2
9.0 9.5 6.7 8.8 10.5 10.4 12.7 8.2 4.2 11.1 4.0 3.7 13.5 5.7 25.0 30.4 3.3

OTHER 4 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0
1.3 1.6 3.3 1.0 3.2 2.7 4.0 3.7 6.3

UNSURE 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0
1.7 2.6 1.6 3.5 2.7 3.7 6.0 2.9

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 0.5 2.7 2.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q18. Please listen to the following list of issues and and then tell me which TWO issues are most important to you when you're voting for Irvine mayor and city council?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONTROLLING GROWTH AND 120 21 12 57 30 18 22 19 48 47 42 6 85 3 11 10 5 1 119 0 63 57
DEVELOPMENT 40.0 19.8 33.3 67.9 40.5 34.6 31.0 26.8 54.5 49.0 39.3 35.3 42.7 60.0 30.6 29.4 55.6 100.0 39.8 36.2 45.2

LOCAL SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION 97 39 15 20 23 13 27 21 27 31 36 7 63 1 12 12 2 0 97 0 63 34
32.3 36.8 41.7 23.8 31.1 25.0 38.0 29.6 30.7 32.3 33.6 41.2 31.7 20.0 33.3 35.3 22.2 32.4 36.2 27.0

TRAFFIC CONGESTION 84 21 12 32 19 14 20 19 31 34 23 2 57 3 17 3 2 0 84 0 46 38
28.0 19.8 33.3 38.1 25.7 26.9 28.2 26.8 35.2 35.4 21.5 11.8 28.6 60.0 47.2 8.8 22.2 28.1 26.4 30.2

BUILDING THE GREAT PARK 61 26 3 19 13 9 18 21 16 17 20 2 42 0 5 9 3 1 60 0 31 30
20.3 24.5 8.3 22.6 17.6 17.3 25.4 29.6 18.2 17.7 18.7 11.8 21.1 13.9 26.5 33.3 100.0 20.1 17.8 23.8

CITY BUDGET AND FINANCES 54 35 6 6 7 14 18 23 8 12 15 4 40 0 5 4 1 0 54 0 31 23
18.0 33.0 16.7 7.1 9.5 26.9 25.4 32.4 9.1 12.5 14.0 23.5 20.1 13.9 11.8 11.1 18.1 17.8 18.3

BRINGING JOBS TO THE CITY 52 29 4 4 15 9 14 12 11 8 25 1 30 0 11 9 1 0 52 0 34 18
17.3 27.4 11.1 4.8 20.3 17.3 19.7 16.9 12.5 8.3 23.4 5.9 15.1 30.6 26.5 11.1 17.4 19.5 14.3

AFFORDABLE HOUSING 52 10 11 12 19 15 5 10 14 14 23 6 29 2 5 10 0 0 52 0 34 18
17.3 9.4 30.6 14.3 25.7 28.8 7.0 14.1 15.9 14.6 21.5 35.3 14.6 40.0 13.9 29.4 17.4 19.5 14.3

CRIME, GANGS, DRUGS, 36 16 5 5 10 7 11 12 5 10 13 3 20 0 4 7 2 0 36 0 19 17
GRAFFITI 12.0 15.1 13.9 6.0 13.5 13.5 15.5 16.9 5.7 10.4 12.1 17.6 10.1 11.1 20.6 22.2 12.0 10.9 13.5

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 27 8 4 12 3 5 4 0 13 16 8 3 17 1 2 2 2 0 27 0 18 9
9.0 7.5 11.1 14.3 4.1 9.6 5.6 14.8 16.7 7.5 17.6 8.5 20.0 5.6 5.9 22.2 9.0 10.3 7.1

OTHER 4 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 1
1.3 0.9 1.2 2.7 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.9 2.0 1.3 1.7 0.8

UNSURE 5 3 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 2.8 2.7 1.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 1.9 2.0 2.9 1.7 1.7 1.6

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
0.3 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q19. In general, would you say that there is too much development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of development just about right?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 75 111 74 66 39 61 53 72 140 45 1 26 63 48 49 40 35 49 62
62.0 51.7 71.6 60.7 68.8 54.9 58.7 67.9 61.0 62.2 60.8 100.0 51.0 60.0 71.6 63.6 47.1 58.3 69.0 73.8

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 103 62 41 45 27 27 40 22 41 76 27 0 21 40 16 26 39 23 22 19
34.3 42.8 26.5 36.9 28.1 38.0 38.5 28.2 34.7 33.8 36.5 41.2 38.1 23.9 33.8 45.9 38.3 31.0 22.6

TOO LITTLE 5 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 2 3 2 0 2 1 1 1 3 0 0 2
1.7 2.1 1.3 3.1 2.8 3.8 1.7 1.3 2.7 3.9 1.0 1.5 1.3 3.5 2.4

UNSURE 5 4 1 3 0 2 3 0 2 5 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 1
1.7 2.8 0.6 2.5 2.8 2.9 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.3 2.4 3.3 1.2

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 2.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q19. In general, would you say that there is too much development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of development just about right?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 31 43 23 16 18 48 27 47 23 16 33 33 58 30 24 41 24 2 7 0
62.0 53.4 67.2 50.0 64.0 51.4 78.7 56.3 63.5 48.9 66.7 64.7 73.3 67.4 75.0 55.8 55.4 54.5 66.7 70.0

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 103 25 20 18 9 16 11 20 25 20 7 17 10 27 9 19 25 19 1 3 0
34.3 43.1 31.3 39.1 36.0 45.7 18.0 41.7 33.8 42.6 29.2 33.3 22.2 31.4 22.5 44.2 33.8 43.2 33.3 30.0

TOO LITTLE 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0
1.7 4.3 2.9 3.3 4.3 2.0 4.4 2.5 5.4

UNSURE 5 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
1.7 3.4 1.6 4.3 2.1 2.7 2.1 4.2 1.2 4.1 2.3

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q19. In general, would you say that there is too much development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of development just about right?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 122 17 47 13 58 39 51 25 13 17 32 15 22 28 4 15 40
62.0 64.2 56.7 58.8 68.4 60.4 61.9 60.0 67.6 54.2 63.0 64.0 55.6 59.5 80.0 25.0 65.2 65.6

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 103 62 12 29 5 34 21 31 12 11 9 16 11 14 5 11 8 18
34.3 32.6 40.0 36.3 26.3 35.4 33.3 36.5 32.4 45.8 33.3 32.0 40.7 37.8 14.3 68.8 34.8 29.5

TOO LITTLE 5 4 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1
1.7 2.1 1.3 2.1 3.2 1.2 2.7 5.7 6.3 1.6

UNSURE 5 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
1.7 1.1 3.3 2.5 2.1 1.6 2.4 3.7 2.0 3.7 3.3

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 5.3 2.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q19. In general, would you say that there is too much development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of development just about right?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 39 25 75 47 33 37 35 68 71 61 10 130 4 18 17 7 1 185 0 102 84
62.0 36.8 69.4 89.3 63.5 63.5 52.1 49.3 77.3 74.0 57.0 58.8 65.3 80.0 50.0 50.0 77.8 100.0 61.9 58.6 66.7

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 103 62 10 9 22 17 31 33 17 22 42 7 64 0 15 15 2 0 103 0 64 39
34.3 58.5 27.8 10.7 29.7 32.7 43.7 46.5 19.3 22.9 39.3 41.2 32.2 41.7 44.1 22.2 34.4 36.8 31.0

TOO LITTLE 5 3 1 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 0 4 1
1.7 2.8 2.8 1.4 3.8 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.1 1.0 20.0 2.8 2.9 1.7 2.3 0.8

UNSURE 5 2 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 1.9 4.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 2.8 1.5 2.8 2.9 1.7 1.7 1.6

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q20. Thinking specifically about the development of apartments in Irvine, would you say that there is too much apartment development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of
apartment development just about right?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 80 106 80 62 38 65 50 71 141 44 1 25 62 50 49 42 38 45 61
62.0 55.2 68.4 65.6 64.6 53.5 62.5 64.1 60.2 62.7 59.5 100.0 49.0 59.0 74.6 63.6 49.4 63.3 63.4 72.6

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 88 51 37 38 23 23 35 20 33 64 24 0 20 34 13 21 35 16 19 18
29.3 35.2 23.9 31.1 24.0 32.4 33.7 25.6 28.0 28.4 32.4 39.2 32.4 19.4 27.3 41.2 26.7 26.8 21.4

TOO LITTLE 17 10 7 2 7 7 2 5 10 12 5 0 5 7 2 3 6 4 6 1
5.7 6.9 4.5 1.6 7.3 9.9 1.9 6.4 8.5 5.3 6.8 9.8 6.7 3.0 3.9 7.1 6.7 8.5 1.2

UNSURE 8 3 5 2 4 2 2 3 3 7 1 0 0 2 2 4 1 2 1 4
2.7 2.1 3.2 1.6 4.2 2.8 1.9 3.8 2.5 3.1 1.4 1.9 3.0 5.2 1.2 3.3 1.4 4.8

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 2.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q20. Thinking specifically about the development of apartments in Irvine, would you say that there is too much apartment development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of
apartment development just about right?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 34 46 23 15 20 42 26 54 24 14 32 30 59 23 32 41 24 2 5 0
62.0 58.6 71.9 50.0 60.0 57.1 68.9 54.2 73.0 51.1 58.3 62.7 66.7 68.6 57.5 74.4 55.4 54.5 66.7 50.0

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 88 21 17 17 6 11 12 21 17 16 7 13 10 21 12 11 22 17 1 4 0
29.3 36.2 26.6 37.0 24.0 31.4 19.7 43.8 23.0 34.0 29.2 25.5 22.2 24.4 30.0 25.6 29.7 38.6 33.3 40.0

TOO LITTLE 17 2 0 3 4 4 3 1 1 5 2 5 2 2 5 0 7 2 0 1 0
5.7 3.4 6.5 16.0 11.4 4.9 2.1 1.4 10.6 8.3 9.8 4.4 2.3 12.5 9.5 4.5 10.0

UNSURE 8 1 1 2 0 0 4 0 2 1 1 1 3 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
2.7 1.7 1.6 4.3 6.6 2.7 2.1 4.2 2.0 6.7 4.7 4.1 2.3

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q20. Thinking specifically about the development of apartments in Irvine, would you say that there is too much apartment development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of
apartment development just about right?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 113 24 49 11 54 37 53 31 11 20 30 16 22 30 5 13 39
62.0 59.5 80.0 61.3 57.9 56.3 58.7 62.4 83.8 45.8 74.1 60.0 59.3 59.5 85.7 31.3 56.5 63.9

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 88 61 4 23 6 31 22 24 5 7 4 16 9 11 5 8 8 20
29.3 32.1 13.3 28.8 31.6 32.3 34.9 28.2 13.5 29.2 14.8 32.0 33.3 29.7 14.3 50.0 34.8 32.8

TOO LITTLE 17 10 1 6 1 8 2 5 1 5 2 1 1 3 0 2 1 2
5.7 5.3 3.3 7.5 5.3 8.3 3.2 5.9 2.7 20.8 7.4 2.0 3.7 8.1 12.5 4.3 3.3

UNSURE 8 6 1 1 0 3 2 3 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 0
2.7 3.2 3.3 1.3 3.1 3.2 3.5 4.2 3.7 4.0 3.7 2.7 6.3 4.3

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 5.3 2.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q20. Thinking specifically about the development of apartments in Irvine, would you say that there is too much apartment development in Irvine, too little or is the amount of
apartment development just about right?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 186 55 20 64 47 34 40 43 61 66 61 11 127 3 19 18 8 1 185 0 100 86
62.0 51.9 55.6 76.2 63.5 65.4 56.3 60.6 69.3 68.8 57.0 64.7 63.8 60.0 52.8 52.9 88.9 100.0 61.9 57.5 68.3

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 88 44 10 16 18 17 27 26 21 23 30 5 58 0 13 11 1 0 88 0 56 32
29.3 41.5 27.8 19.0 24.3 32.7 38.0 36.6 23.9 24.0 28.0 29.4 29.1 36.1 32.4 11.1 29.4 32.2 25.4

TOO LITTLE 17 6 4 3 4 1 3 1 4 5 10 1 9 1 2 4 0 0 17 0 12 5
5.7 5.7 11.1 3.6 5.4 1.9 4.2 1.4 4.5 5.2 9.3 5.9 4.5 20.0 5.6 11.8 5.7 6.9 4.0

UNSURE 8 1 2 1 4 0 1 1 2 2 5 0 5 1 1 1 0 0 8 0 5 3
2.7 0.9 5.6 1.2 5.4 1.4 1.4 2.3 2.1 4.7 2.5 20.0 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.4

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q21. Thinking specifically about the development of shopping centers in Irvine, would you say that there is too much shopping center development in Irvine, too little or is
the amount of shopping center development just about right?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 52 24 28 13 22 17 10 18 24 46 6 0 6 11 18 17 10 14 7 21
17.3 16.6 18.1 10.7 22.9 23.9 9.6 23.1 20.3 20.4 8.1 11.8 10.5 26.9 22.1 11.8 23.3 9.9 25.0

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 212 104 108 90 64 47 77 51 84 150 62 0 37 81 43 51 62 42 56 52
70.7 71.7 69.7 73.8 66.7 66.2 74.0 65.4 71.2 66.7 83.8 72.5 77.1 64.2 66.2 72.9 70.0 78.9 61.9

TOO LITTLE 26 14 12 16 7 3 14 7 5 20 5 1 7 12 5 2 12 2 7 5
8.7 9.7 7.7 13.1 7.3 4.2 13.5 9.0 4.2 8.9 6.8 100.0 13.7 11.4 7.5 2.6 14.1 3.3 9.9 6.0

UNSURE 8 2 6 2 3 3 2 2 4 7 1 0 0 1 1 6 0 2 1 5
2.7 1.4 3.9 1.6 3.1 4.2 1.9 2.6 3.4 3.1 1.4 1.0 1.5 7.8 3.3 1.4 6.0

REFUSED 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.9 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q21. Thinking specifically about the development of shopping centers in Irvine, would you say that there is too much shopping center development in Irvine, too little or is
the amount of shopping center development just about right?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 52 8 5 9 8 7 15 3 10 8 9 6 16 19 12 3 13 5 0 0 0
17.3 13.8 7.8 19.6 32.0 20.0 24.6 6.3 13.5 17.0 37.5 11.8 35.6 22.1 30.0 7.0 17.6 11.4

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 212 41 49 34 13 23 41 34 56 35 12 39 25 57 23 35 54 31 3 9 0
70.7 70.7 76.6 73.9 52.0 65.7 67.2 70.8 75.7 74.5 50.0 76.5 55.6 66.3 57.5 81.4 73.0 70.5 100.0 90.0

TOO LITTLE 26 8 8 1 2 5 2 11 5 2 1 6 1 5 4 4 4 8 0 1 0
8.7 13.8 12.5 2.2 8.0 14.3 3.3 22.9 6.8 4.3 4.2 11.8 2.2 5.8 10.0 9.3 5.4 18.2 10.0

UNSURE 8 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 1 2 0 3 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
2.7 1.7 1.6 2.2 8.0 4.9 2.7 2.1 8.3 6.7 4.7 2.5 2.3 2.7

REFUSED 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.6 2.2 1.4 2.1 1.2 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q21. Thinking specifically about the development of shopping centers in Irvine, would you say that there is too much shopping center development in Irvine, too little or is
the amount of shopping center development just about right?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 52 38 4 10 2 12 14 18 6 4 2 7 4 7 8 5 2 13
17.3 20.0 13.3 12.5 10.5 12.5 22.2 21.2 16.2 16.7 7.4 14.0 14.8 18.9 22.9 31.3 8.7 21.3

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 212 128 25 59 15 66 44 59 28 19 21 35 21 25 25 10 16 40
70.7 67.4 83.3 73.8 78.9 68.8 69.8 69.4 75.7 79.2 77.8 70.0 77.8 67.6 71.4 62.5 69.6 65.6

TOO LITTLE 26 18 0 8 1 16 3 4 2 1 1 3 0 5 2 1 5 8
8.7 9.5 10.0 5.3 16.7 4.8 4.7 5.4 4.2 3.7 6.0 13.5 5.7 6.3 21.7 13.1

UNSURE 8 5 1 2 0 2 2 4 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
2.7 2.6 3.3 2.5 2.1 3.2 4.7 11.1 8.0 3.7

REFUSED 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 1.3 5.3 2.7 2.0 3.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q21. Thinking specifically about the development of shopping centers in Irvine, would you say that there is too much shopping center development in Irvine, too little or is
the amount of shopping center development just about right?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

TOO MUCH 52 8 11 20 13 5 10 4 22 17 22 2 38 3 3 3 3 0 52 0 31 21
17.3 7.5 30.6 23.8 17.6 9.6 14.1 5.6 25.0 17.7 20.6 11.8 19.1 60.0 8.3 8.8 33.3 17.4 17.8 16.7

JUST ABOUT RIGHT 212 86 21 58 47 42 56 61 59 72 64 14 135 1 29 27 6 0 212 0 121 91
70.7 81.1 58.3 69.0 63.5 80.8 78.9 85.9 67.0 75.0 59.8 82.4 67.8 20.0 80.6 79.4 66.7 70.9 69.5 72.2

TOO LITTLE 26 12 3 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 13 0 19 1 3 3 0 0 26 0 19 7
8.7 11.3 8.3 6.0 8.1 9.6 7.0 8.5 5.7 5.2 12.1 9.5 20.0 8.3 8.8 8.7 10.9 5.6

UNSURE 8 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 2 2 6 1 6 0 0 1 0 1 7 0 2 6
2.7 2.8 1.2 8.1 2.3 2.1 5.6 5.9 3.0 2.9 100.0 2.3 1.1 4.8

REFUSED 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 2.7 1.9 0.5 2.8 0.7 0.6 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q22. Which of the following statements do you agree with more? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

"DEVELOPMENT IS A PROBLEM 187 72 115 73 68 38 61 54 72 144 43 0 26 59 49 53 34 38 51 64
IN IRVINE, CREATING TRAFFIC 62.3 49.7 74.2 59.8 70.8 53.5 58.7 69.2 61.0 64.0 58.1 51.0 56.2 73.1 68.8 40.0 63.3 71.8 76.2
AND OVERCROWDING SCHOOLS
AND ITS ONLY GETTING
WORSE. WE NEED TO SLOW DOWN
OR HALT DEVELOPMENT FOR AT
LEAST A YEAR OR TWO."
[NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 154 58 96 59 53 34 48 44 62 116 38 0 18 48 41 47 27 31 39 57
51.3 40.0 61.9 48.4 55.2 47.9 46.2 56.4 52.5 51.6 51.4 35.3 45.7 61.2 61.0 31.8 51.7 54.9 67.9

SOMEWHAT AGREE 33 14 19 14 15 4 13 10 10 28 5 0 8 11 8 6 7 7 12 7
11.0 9.7 12.3 11.5 15.6 5.6 12.5 12.8 8.5 12.4 6.8 15.7 10.5 11.9 7.8 8.2 11.7 16.9 8.3

"DEVELOPMENT IS GOOD FOR 96 64 32 41 26 27 35 22 39 66 30 0 20 41 17 18 44 20 17 15
IRVINE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS 32.0 44.1 20.6 33.6 27.1 38.0 33.7 28.2 33.1 29.3 40.5 39.2 39.0 25.4 23.4 51.8 33.3 23.9 17.9
JOBS AND OPPORTUNITY.
DEVELOPMENT INCREASES
PROSPERITY IN OUR
COMMUNITY." [NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 52 38 14 20 16 14 18 12 22 31 21 0 11 20 10 11 24 14 7 7
17.3 26.2 9.0 16.4 16.7 19.7 17.3 15.4 18.6 13.8 28.4 21.6 19.0 14.9 14.3 28.2 23.3 9.9 8.3

SOMEWHAT AGREE 44 26 18 21 10 13 17 10 17 35 9 0 9 21 7 7 20 6 10 8
14.7 17.9 11.6 17.2 10.4 18.3 16.3 12.8 14.4 15.6 12.2 17.6 20.0 10.4 9.1 23.5 10.0 14.1 9.5

UNSURE 13 8 5 6 2 5 6 2 5 12 0 1 4 4 1 4 6 2 2 3
4.3 5.5 3.2 4.9 2.1 7.0 5.8 2.6 4.2 5.3 100.0 7.8 3.8 1.5 5.2 7.1 3.3 2.8 3.6

REFUSED 4 1 3 2 0 1 2 0 2 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 2
1.3 0.7 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.4 2.0 1.0 2.6 1.2 1.4 2.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q22. Which of the following statements do you agree with more? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

"DEVELOPMENT IS A PROBLEM 187 29 44 20 18 19 49 22 51 23 15 33 35 58 27 26 41 27 3 5 0
IN IRVINE, CREATING TRAFFIC 62.3 50.0 68.8 43.5 72.0 54.3 80.3 45.8 68.9 48.9 62.5 64.7 77.8 67.4 67.5 60.5 55.4 61.4 100.0 50.0
AND OVERCROWDING SCHOOLS
AND ITS ONLY GETTING
WORSE. WE NEED TO SLOW DOWN
OR HALT DEVELOPMENT FOR AT
LEAST A YEAR OR TWO."
[NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 154 23 36 17 17 14 39 15 44 20 14 24 29 48 23 21 34 21 3 4 0
51.3 39.7 56.3 37.0 68.0 40.0 63.9 31.3 59.5 42.6 58.3 47.1 64.4 55.8 57.5 48.8 45.9 47.7 100.0 40.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 33 6 8 3 1 5 10 7 7 3 1 9 6 10 4 5 7 6 0 1 0
11.0 10.3 12.5 6.5 4.0 14.3 16.4 14.6 9.5 6.4 4.2 17.6 13.3 11.6 10.0 11.6 9.5 13.6 10.0

"DEVELOPMENT IS GOOD FOR 96 26 15 21 6 15 11 23 18 19 8 17 9 22 11 15 28 15 0 5 0
IRVINE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS 32.0 44.8 23.4 45.7 24.0 42.9 18.0 47.9 24.3 40.4 33.3 33.3 20.0 25.6 27.5 34.9 37.8 34.1 50.0
JOBS AND OPPORTUNITY.
DEVELOPMENT INCREASES
PROSPERITY IN OUR
COMMUNITY." [NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 52 14 6 10 4 12 4 9 11 9 5 11 5 13 3 9 16 9 0 2 0
17.3 24.1 9.4 21.7 16.0 34.3 6.6 18.8 14.9 19.1 20.8 21.6 11.1 15.1 7.5 20.9 21.6 20.5 20.0

SOMEWHAT AGREE 44 12 9 11 2 3 7 14 7 10 3 6 4 9 8 6 12 6 0 3 0
14.7 20.7 14.1 23.9 8.0 8.6 11.5 29.2 9.5 21.3 12.5 11.8 8.9 10.5 20.0 14.0 16.2 13.6 30.0

UNSURE 13 3 3 4 1 1 1 3 3 4 1 1 1 4 2 2 3 2 0 0 0
4.3 5.2 4.7 8.7 4.0 2.9 1.6 6.3 4.1 8.5 4.2 2.0 2.2 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.1 4.5

REFUSED 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
1.3 3.1 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.3 2.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q22. Which of the following statements do you agree with more? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

"DEVELOPMENT IS A PROBLEM 187 120 20 47 11 54 45 53 24 14 19 30 12 22 27 6 14 43
IN IRVINE, CREATING TRAFFIC 62.3 63.2 66.7 58.8 57.9 56.3 71.4 62.4 64.9 58.3 70.4 60.0 44.4 59.5 77.1 37.5 60.9 70.5
AND OVERCROWDING SCHOOLS
AND ITS ONLY GETTING
WORSE. WE NEED TO SLOW DOWN
OR HALT DEVELOPMENT FOR AT
LEAST A YEAR OR TWO."
[NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 154 99 16 39 10 39 39 44 22 10 16 25 8 19 24 5 14 33
51.3 52.1 53.3 48.8 52.6 40.6 61.9 51.8 59.5 41.7 59.3 50.0 29.6 51.4 68.6 31.3 60.9 54.1

SOMEWHAT AGREE 33 21 4 8 1 15 6 9 2 4 3 5 4 3 3 1 0 10
11.0 11.1 13.3 10.0 5.3 15.6 9.5 10.6 5.4 16.7 11.1 10.0 14.8 8.1 8.6 6.3 16.4

"DEVELOPMENT IS GOOD FOR 96 58 9 29 5 35 17 29 10 9 7 15 13 13 8 8 7 16
IRVINE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS 32.0 30.5 30.0 36.3 26.3 36.5 27.0 34.1 27.0 37.5 25.9 30.0 48.1 35.1 22.9 50.0 30.4 26.2
JOBS AND OPPORTUNITY.
DEVELOPMENT INCREASES
PROSPERITY IN OUR
COMMUNITY." [NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 52 37 5 10 2 19 10 15 6 4 5 6 5 10 5 5 3 9
17.3 19.5 16.7 12.5 10.5 19.8 15.9 17.6 16.2 16.7 18.5 12.0 18.5 27.0 14.3 31.3 13.0 14.8

SOMEWHAT AGREE 44 21 4 19 3 16 7 14 4 5 2 9 8 3 3 3 4 7
14.7 11.1 13.3 23.8 15.8 16.7 11.1 16.5 10.8 20.8 7.4 18.0 29.6 8.1 8.6 18.8 17.4 11.5

UNSURE 13 9 1 3 2 6 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 0 2 2 2
4.3 4.7 3.3 3.8 10.5 6.3 1.6 3.5 2.7 4.2 3.7 6.0 3.7 2.7 12.5 8.7 3.3

REFUSED 4 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0
1.3 1.6 1.3 5.3 1.0 5.4 4.0 3.7 2.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q22. Which of the following statements do you agree with more? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

"DEVELOPMENT IS A PROBLEM 187 39 27 73 48 32 34 31 71 76 62 10 128 4 16 22 7 1 186 0 105 82
IN IRVINE, CREATING TRAFFIC 62.3 36.8 75.0 86.9 64.9 61.5 47.9 43.7 80.7 79.2 57.9 58.8 64.3 80.0 44.4 64.7 77.8 100.0 62.2 60.3 65.1
AND OVERCROWDING SCHOOLS
AND ITS ONLY GETTING
WORSE. WE NEED TO SLOW DOWN
OR HALT DEVELOPMENT FOR AT
LEAST A YEAR OR TWO."
[NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 154 29 23 63 39 27 27 24 60 64 50 9 108 4 10 16 7 1 153 0 80 74
51.3 27.4 63.9 75.0 52.7 51.9 38.0 33.8 68.2 66.7 46.7 52.9 54.3 80.0 27.8 47.1 77.8 100.0 51.2 46.0 58.7

SOMEWHAT AGREE 33 10 4 10 9 5 7 7 11 12 12 1 20 0 6 6 0 0 33 0 25 8
11.0 9.4 11.1 11.9 12.2 9.6 9.9 9.9 12.5 12.5 11.2 5.9 10.1 16.7 17.6 11.0 14.4 6.3

"DEVELOPMENT IS GOOD FOR 96 63 9 10 14 20 33 37 14 20 33 6 58 1 18 11 2 0 96 0 59 37
IRVINE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS 32.0 59.4 25.0 11.9 18.9 38.5 46.5 52.1 15.9 20.8 30.8 35.3 29.1 20.0 50.0 32.4 22.2 32.1 33.9 29.4
JOBS AND OPPORTUNITY.
DEVELOPMENT INCREASES
PROSPERITY IN OUR
COMMUNITY." [NET]
---------------------------

STRONGLY AGREE 52 35 5 4 8 7 19 20 7 8 21 1 31 1 11 7 1 0 52 0 32 20
17.3 33.0 13.9 4.8 10.8 13.5 26.8 28.2 8.0 8.3 19.6 5.9 15.6 20.0 30.6 20.6 11.1 17.4 18.4 15.9

SOMEWHAT AGREE 44 28 4 6 6 13 14 17 7 12 12 5 27 0 7 4 1 0 44 0 27 17
14.7 26.4 11.1 7.1 8.1 25.0 19.7 23.9 8.0 12.5 11.2 29.4 13.6 19.4 11.8 11.1 14.7 15.5 13.5

UNSURE 13 4 0 0 9 0 3 2 3 0 9 1 10 0 1 1 0 0 13 0 8 5
4.3 3.8 12.2 4.2 2.8 3.4 8.4 5.9 5.0 2.8 2.9 4.3 4.6 4.0

REFUSED 4 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 2 2
1.3 1.2 4.1 1.4 1.4 2.8 1.5 2.8 1.3 1.1 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q23. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new home projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 172 67 105 61 61 42 50 47 75 130 41 1 26 57 44 45 36 31 47 58
------------- 57.3 46.2 67.7 50.0 63.5 59.2 48.1 60.3 63.6 57.8 55.4 100.0 51.0 54.3 65.7 58.4 42.4 51.7 66.2 69.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 115 45 70 40 44 26 33 34 48 89 26 0 14 34 32 35 21 24 27 43
38.3 31.0 45.2 32.8 45.8 36.6 31.7 43.6 40.7 39.6 35.1 27.5 32.4 47.8 45.5 24.7 40.0 38.0 51.2

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 57 22 35 21 17 16 17 13 27 41 15 1 12 23 12 10 15 7 20 15
19.0 15.2 22.6 17.2 17.7 22.5 16.3 16.7 22.9 18.2 20.3 100.0 23.5 21.9 17.9 13.0 17.6 11.7 28.2 17.9

OPPOSE [NET] 102 68 34 49 31 19 43 27 32 76 26 0 20 37 20 25 42 26 15 19
------------ 34.0 46.9 21.9 40.2 32.3 26.8 41.3 34.6 27.1 33.8 35.1 39.2 35.2 29.9 32.5 49.4 43.3 21.1 22.6

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 36 18 29 16 6 27 15 12 38 16 0 6 22 12 14 21 15 7 11
18.0 24.8 11.6 23.8 16.7 8.5 26.0 19.2 10.2 16.9 21.6 11.8 21.0 17.9 18.2 24.7 25.0 9.9 13.1

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 48 32 16 20 15 13 16 12 20 38 10 0 14 15 8 11 21 11 8 8
16.0 22.1 10.3 16.4 15.6 18.3 15.4 15.4 16.9 16.9 13.5 27.5 14.3 11.9 14.3 24.7 18.3 11.3 9.5

UNSURE 23 9 14 10 4 9 9 4 10 17 6 0 4 10 3 6 6 3 8 6
7.7 6.2 9.0 8.2 4.2 12.7 8.7 5.1 8.5 7.6 8.1 7.8 9.5 4.5 7.8 7.1 5.0 11.3 7.1

REFUSED 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
1.0 0.7 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.9 0.8 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q23. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new home projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 172 23 38 23 19 17 44 21 40 26 16 29 32 54 22 22 37 28 3 6 0
------------- 57.3 39.7 59.4 50.0 76.0 48.6 72.1 43.8 54.1 55.3 66.7 56.9 71.1 62.8 55.0 51.2 50.0 63.6 100.0 60.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 115 14 26 16 10 12 32 9 31 16 10 19 25 37 15 16 26 18 0 3 0
38.3 24.1 40.6 34.8 40.0 34.3 52.5 18.8 41.9 34.0 41.7 37.3 55.6 43.0 37.5 37.2 35.1 40.9 30.0

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 57 9 12 7 9 5 12 12 9 10 6 10 7 17 7 6 11 10 3 3 0
19.0 15.5 18.8 15.2 36.0 14.3 19.7 25.0 12.2 21.3 25.0 19.6 15.6 19.8 17.5 14.0 14.9 22.7 100.0 30.0

OPPOSE [NET] 102 32 17 17 2 17 14 21 28 14 5 19 12 28 15 17 27 11 0 4 0
------------ 34.0 55.2 26.6 37.0 8.0 48.6 23.0 43.8 37.8 29.8 20.8 37.3 26.7 32.6 37.5 39.5 36.5 25.0 40.0

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 19 10 4 2 11 5 12 17 3 3 10 6 19 8 9 11 5 0 2 0
18.0 32.8 15.6 8.7 8.0 31.4 8.2 25.0 23.0 6.4 12.5 19.6 13.3 22.1 20.0 20.9 14.9 11.4 20.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 48 13 7 13 0 6 9 9 11 11 2 9 6 9 7 8 16 6 0 2 0
16.0 22.4 10.9 28.3 17.1 14.8 18.8 14.9 23.4 8.3 17.6 13.3 10.5 17.5 18.6 21.6 13.6 20.0

UNSURE 23 3 7 5 4 1 3 5 5 6 3 3 1 3 3 4 9 4 0 0 0
7.7 5.2 10.9 10.9 16.0 2.9 4.9 10.4 6.8 12.8 12.5 5.9 2.2 3.5 7.5 9.3 12.2 9.1

REFUSED 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1.0 3.1 2.2 2.1 1.4 2.1 1.2 1.4 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q23. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new home projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 172 112 20 40 13 51 37 49 22 16 14 30 15 20 24 7 10 36
------------- 57.3 58.9 66.7 50.0 68.4 53.1 58.7 57.6 59.5 66.7 51.9 60.0 55.6 54.1 68.6 43.8 43.5 59.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 115 71 14 30 5 31 24 35 20 7 12 20 7 15 19 2 7 26
38.3 37.4 46.7 37.5 26.3 32.3 38.1 41.2 54.1 29.2 44.4 40.0 25.9 40.5 54.3 12.5 30.4 42.6

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 57 41 6 10 8 20 13 14 2 9 2 10 8 5 5 5 3 10
19.0 21.6 20.0 12.5 42.1 20.8 20.6 16.5 5.4 37.5 7.4 20.0 29.6 13.5 14.3 31.3 13.0 16.4

OPPOSE [NET] 102 59 9 34 4 33 22 32 11 7 10 13 10 17 9 7 6 23
------------ 34.0 31.1 30.0 42.5 21.1 34.4 34.9 37.6 29.7 29.2 37.0 26.0 37.0 45.9 25.7 43.8 26.1 37.7

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 32 5 17 1 18 12 15 8 2 4 8 8 11 3 2 1 15
18.0 16.8 16.7 21.3 5.3 18.8 19.0 17.6 21.6 8.3 14.8 16.0 29.6 29.7 8.6 12.5 4.3 24.6

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 48 27 4 17 3 15 10 17 3 5 6 5 2 6 6 5 5 8
16.0 14.2 13.3 21.3 15.8 15.6 15.9 20.0 8.1 20.8 22.2 10.0 7.4 16.2 17.1 31.3 21.7 13.1

UNSURE 23 17 1 5 0 12 4 4 3 1 3 5 2 0 2 2 6 2
7.7 8.9 3.3 6.3 12.5 6.3 4.7 8.1 4.2 11.1 10.0 7.4 5.7 12.5 26.1 3.3

REFUSED 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
1.0 1.1 1.3 10.5 2.7 4.0 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q23. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new home projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 172 44 24 62 42 33 34 32 59 68 57 9 115 4 21 19 4 0 172 0 100 72
------------- 57.3 41.5 66.7 73.8 56.8 63.5 47.9 45.1 67.0 70.8 53.3 52.9 57.8 80.0 58.3 55.9 44.4 57.5 57.5 57.1

STRONGLY SUPPORT 115 20 16 49 30 24 17 16 40 45 42 5 82 3 9 12 4 0 115 0 62 53
38.3 18.9 44.4 58.3 40.5 46.2 23.9 22.5 45.5 46.9 39.3 29.4 41.2 60.0 25.0 35.3 44.4 38.5 35.6 42.1

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 57 24 8 13 12 9 17 16 19 23 15 4 33 1 12 7 0 0 57 0 38 19
19.0 22.6 22.2 15.5 16.2 17.3 23.9 22.5 21.6 24.0 14.0 23.5 16.6 20.0 33.3 20.6 19.1 21.8 15.1

OPPOSE [NET] 102 55 12 18 17 15 36 36 23 24 34 5 68 1 12 13 3 0 102 0 59 43
------------ 34.0 51.9 33.3 21.4 23.0 28.8 50.7 50.7 26.1 25.0 31.8 29.4 34.2 20.0 33.3 38.2 33.3 34.1 33.9 34.1

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 31 4 11 8 8 18 23 11 9 19 4 35 0 6 6 3 0 54 0 29 25
18.0 29.2 11.1 13.1 10.8 15.4 25.4 32.4 12.5 9.4 17.8 23.5 17.6 16.7 17.6 33.3 18.1 16.7 19.8

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 48 24 8 7 9 7 18 13 12 15 15 1 33 1 6 7 0 0 48 0 30 18
16.0 22.6 22.2 8.3 12.2 13.5 25.4 18.3 13.6 15.6 14.0 5.9 16.6 20.0 16.7 20.6 16.1 17.2 14.3

UNSURE 23 7 0 4 12 4 1 3 6 4 13 3 15 0 2 2 1 1 22 0 13 10
7.7 6.6 4.8 16.2 7.7 1.4 4.2 6.8 4.2 12.1 17.6 7.5 5.6 5.9 11.1 100.0 7.4 7.5 7.9

REFUSED 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 4.1 2.8 0.5 2.8 11.1 1.0 1.1 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q24. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new apartment projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 187 72 115 75 62 43 61 49 77 142 44 1 24 63 46 54 37 35 50 65
------------- 62.3 49.7 74.2 61.5 64.6 60.6 58.7 62.8 65.3 63.1 59.5 100.0 47.1 60.0 68.7 70.1 43.5 58.3 70.4 77.4

STRONGLY SUPPORT 146 58 88 61 47 33 50 38 58 111 34 1 13 47 39 47 27 31 33 55
48.7 40.0 56.8 50.0 49.0 46.5 48.1 48.7 49.2 49.3 45.9 100.0 25.5 44.8 58.2 61.0 31.8 51.7 46.5 65.5

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 41 14 27 14 15 10 11 11 19 31 10 0 11 16 7 7 10 4 17 10
13.7 9.7 17.4 11.5 15.6 14.1 10.6 14.1 16.1 13.8 13.5 21.6 15.2 10.4 9.1 11.8 6.7 23.9 11.9

OPPOSE [NET] 95 64 31 41 29 22 38 25 32 68 27 0 24 37 17 17 43 21 18 13
------------ 31.7 44.1 20.0 33.6 30.2 31.0 36.5 32.1 27.1 30.2 36.5 47.1 35.2 25.4 22.1 50.6 35.0 25.4 15.5

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 40 14 29 14 8 27 13 14 37 17 0 11 23 10 10 28 12 6 8
18.0 27.6 9.0 23.8 14.6 11.3 26.0 16.7 11.9 16.4 23.0 21.6 21.9 14.9 13.0 32.9 20.0 8.5 9.5

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 41 24 17 12 15 14 11 12 18 31 10 0 13 14 7 7 15 9 12 5
13.7 16.6 11.0 9.8 15.6 19.7 10.6 15.4 15.3 13.8 13.5 25.5 13.3 10.4 9.1 17.6 15.0 16.9 6.0

UNSURE 17 8 9 6 5 5 5 4 8 14 3 0 2 5 4 6 4 4 3 6
5.7 5.5 5.8 4.9 5.2 7.0 4.8 5.1 6.8 6.2 4.1 3.9 4.8 6.0 7.8 4.7 6.7 4.2 7.1

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 2.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q24. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new apartment projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 187 26 49 26 17 17 45 25 50 26 17 29 33 63 23 29 44 23 1 4 0
------------- 62.3 44.8 76.6 56.5 68.0 48.6 73.8 52.1 67.6 55.3 70.8 56.9 73.3 73.3 57.5 67.4 59.5 52.3 33.3 40.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 146 22 39 18 15 15 32 16 45 19 14 20 27 51 16 26 35 14 1 3 0
48.7 37.9 60.9 39.1 60.0 42.9 52.5 33.3 60.8 40.4 58.3 39.2 60.0 59.3 40.0 60.5 47.3 31.8 33.3 30.0

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 41 4 10 8 2 2 13 9 5 7 3 9 6 12 7 3 9 9 0 1 0
13.7 6.9 15.6 17.4 8.0 5.7 21.3 18.8 6.8 14.9 12.5 17.6 13.3 14.0 17.5 7.0 12.2 20.5 10.0

OPPOSE [NET] 95 29 12 16 6 16 13 21 20 17 5 20 9 19 14 13 23 18 2 6 0
------------ 31.7 50.0 18.8 34.8 24.0 45.7 21.3 43.8 27.0 36.2 20.8 39.2 20.0 22.1 35.0 30.2 31.1 40.9 66.7 60.0

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 21 8 6 2 10 4 15 14 5 3 11 3 12 7 8 11 10 2 4 0
18.0 36.2 12.5 13.0 8.0 28.6 6.6 31.3 18.9 10.6 12.5 21.6 6.7 14.0 17.5 18.6 14.9 22.7 66.7 40.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 41 8 4 10 4 6 9 6 6 12 2 9 6 7 7 5 12 8 0 2 0
13.7 13.8 6.3 21.7 16.0 17.1 14.8 12.5 8.1 25.5 8.3 17.6 13.3 8.1 17.5 11.6 16.2 18.2 20.0

UNSURE 17 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 4 3 2 2 3 4 3 1 6 3 0 0 0
5.7 5.2 4.7 6.5 8.0 5.7 4.9 4.2 5.4 6.4 8.3 3.9 6.7 4.7 7.5 2.3 8.1 6.8

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q24. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new apartment projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 187 114 22 51 12 50 43 54 28 14 20 32 17 21 28 5 11 39
------------- 62.3 60.0 73.3 63.8 63.2 52.1 68.3 63.5 75.7 58.3 74.1 64.0 63.0 56.8 80.0 31.3 47.8 63.9

STRONGLY SUPPORT 146 88 19 39 10 34 34 41 27 8 17 26 11 17 22 2 10 33
48.7 46.3 63.3 48.8 52.6 35.4 54.0 48.2 73.0 33.3 63.0 52.0 40.7 45.9 62.9 12.5 43.5 54.1

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 41 26 3 12 2 16 9 13 1 6 3 6 6 4 6 3 1 6
13.7 13.7 10.0 15.0 10.5 16.7 14.3 15.3 2.7 25.0 11.1 12.0 22.2 10.8 17.1 18.8 4.3 9.8

OPPOSE [NET] 95 63 7 25 6 36 18 27 8 8 6 12 9 16 6 9 10 19
------------ 31.7 33.2 23.3 31.3 31.6 37.5 28.6 31.8 21.6 33.3 22.2 24.0 33.3 43.2 17.1 56.3 43.5 31.1

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 37 3 14 4 23 9 14 4 4 4 8 5 11 3 1 7 11
18.0 19.5 10.0 17.5 21.1 24.0 14.3 16.5 10.8 16.7 14.8 16.0 18.5 29.7 8.6 6.3 30.4 18.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 41 26 4 11 2 13 9 13 4 4 2 4 4 5 3 8 3 8
13.7 13.7 13.3 13.8 10.5 13.5 14.3 15.3 10.8 16.7 7.4 8.0 14.8 13.5 8.6 50.0 13.0 13.1

UNSURE 17 13 1 3 0 10 2 4 1 2 1 5 1 0 1 2 2 3
5.7 6.8 3.3 3.8 10.4 3.2 4.7 2.7 8.3 3.7 10.0 3.7 2.9 12.5 8.7 4.9

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 5.3 2.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q24. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new apartment projects over 100 units for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 187 52 23 67 45 32 42 41 59 71 63 11 123 4 22 23 4 1 186 0 105 82
------------- 62.3 49.1 63.9 79.8 60.8 61.5 59.2 57.7 67.0 74.0 58.9 64.7 61.8 80.0 61.1 67.6 44.4 100.0 62.2 60.3 65.1

STRONGLY SUPPORT 146 39 18 54 35 24 31 30 47 55 51 11 101 2 14 14 4 1 145 0 76 70
48.7 36.8 50.0 64.3 47.3 46.2 43.7 42.3 53.4 57.3 47.7 64.7 50.8 40.0 38.9 41.2 44.4 100.0 48.5 43.7 55.6

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 41 13 5 13 10 8 11 11 12 16 12 0 22 2 8 9 0 0 41 0 29 12
13.7 12.3 13.9 15.5 13.5 15.4 15.5 15.5 13.6 16.7 11.2 11.1 40.0 22.2 26.5 13.7 16.7 9.5

OPPOSE [NET] 95 49 13 15 18 17 26 26 25 23 34 3 66 1 12 9 4 0 95 0 58 37
------------ 31.7 46.2 36.1 17.9 24.3 32.7 36.6 36.6 28.4 24.0 31.8 17.6 33.2 20.0 33.3 26.5 44.4 31.8 33.3 29.4

STRONGLY OPPOSE 54 30 7 9 8 10 13 17 10 9 23 2 39 0 5 5 3 0 54 0 35 19
18.0 28.3 19.4 10.7 10.8 19.2 18.3 23.9 11.4 9.4 21.5 11.8 19.6 13.9 14.7 33.3 18.1 20.1 15.1

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 41 19 6 6 10 7 13 9 15 14 11 1 27 1 7 4 1 0 41 0 23 18
13.7 17.9 16.7 7.1 13.5 13.5 18.3 12.7 17.0 14.6 10.3 5.9 13.6 20.0 19.4 11.8 11.1 13.7 13.2 14.3

UNSURE 17 5 0 2 10 3 3 4 4 2 9 3 10 0 1 2 1 0 17 0 10 7
5.7 4.7 2.4 13.5 5.8 4.2 5.6 4.5 2.1 8.4 17.6 5.0 2.8 5.9 11.1 5.7 5.7 5.6

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q25. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new commercial building projects for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 142 50 92 54 49 33 46 39 57 109 32 1 18 45 39 40 25 25 38 54
------------- 47.3 34.5 59.4 44.3 51.0 46.5 44.2 50.0 48.3 48.4 43.2 100.0 35.3 42.9 58.2 51.9 29.4 41.7 53.5 64.3

STRONGLY SUPPORT 86 31 55 33 28 21 27 23 36 68 18 0 8 24 22 32 15 16 17 38
28.7 21.4 35.5 27.0 29.2 29.6 26.0 29.5 30.5 30.2 24.3 15.7 22.9 32.8 41.6 17.6 26.7 23.9 45.2

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 56 19 37 21 21 12 19 16 21 41 14 1 10 21 17 8 10 9 21 16
18.7 13.1 23.9 17.2 21.9 16.9 18.3 20.5 17.8 18.2 18.9 100.0 19.6 20.0 25.4 10.4 11.8 15.0 29.6 19.0

OPPOSE [NET] 131 81 50 57 40 30 50 33 48 96 35 0 28 51 24 28 51 30 28 22
------------ 43.7 55.9 32.3 46.7 41.7 42.3 48.1 42.3 40.7 42.7 47.3 54.9 48.6 35.8 36.4 60.0 50.0 39.4 26.2

STRONGLY OPPOSE 68 46 22 35 15 16 32 14 22 47 21 0 12 23 15 18 27 19 8 14
22.7 31.7 14.2 28.7 15.6 22.5 30.8 17.9 18.6 20.9 28.4 23.5 21.9 22.4 23.4 31.8 31.7 11.3 16.7

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 63 35 28 22 25 14 18 19 26 49 14 0 16 28 9 10 24 11 20 8
21.0 24.1 18.1 18.0 26.0 19.7 17.3 24.4 22.0 21.8 18.9 31.4 26.7 13.4 13.0 28.2 18.3 28.2 9.5

UNSURE 26 13 13 11 7 7 8 6 12 19 7 0 4 9 4 9 8 5 5 8
8.7 9.0 8.4 9.0 7.3 9.9 7.7 7.7 10.2 8.4 9.5 7.8 8.6 6.0 11.7 9.4 8.3 7.0 9.5

REFUSED 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.4 2.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q25. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new commercial building projects for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 142 19 35 16 17 13 36 17 37 19 14 22 27 47 15 18 34 22 1 5 0
------------- 47.3 32.8 54.7 34.8 68.0 37.1 59.0 35.4 50.0 40.4 58.3 43.1 60.0 54.7 37.5 41.9 45.9 50.0 33.3 50.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 86 12 21 10 11 7 21 7 26 12 9 10 18 30 12 9 21 10 1 3 0
28.7 20.7 32.8 21.7 44.0 20.0 34.4 14.6 35.1 25.5 37.5 19.6 40.0 34.9 30.0 20.9 28.4 22.7 33.3 30.0

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 56 7 14 6 6 6 15 10 11 7 5 12 9 17 3 9 13 12 0 2 0
18.7 12.1 21.9 13.0 24.0 17.1 24.6 20.8 14.9 14.9 20.8 23.5 20.0 19.8 7.5 20.9 17.6 27.3 20.0

OPPOSE [NET] 131 33 24 25 5 20 20 25 32 23 7 27 13 32 22 20 32 18 2 5 0
------------ 43.7 56.9 37.5 54.3 20.0 57.1 32.8 52.1 43.2 48.9 29.2 52.9 28.9 37.2 55.0 46.5 43.2 40.9 66.7 50.0

STRONGLY OPPOSE 68 20 15 13 3 11 4 14 21 10 6 9 6 20 12 12 12 9 0 3 0
22.7 34.5 23.4 28.3 12.0 31.4 6.6 29.2 28.4 21.3 25.0 17.6 13.3 23.3 30.0 27.9 16.2 20.5 30.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 63 13 9 12 2 9 16 11 11 13 1 18 7 12 10 8 20 9 2 2 0
21.0 22.4 14.1 26.1 8.0 25.7 26.2 22.9 14.9 27.7 4.2 35.3 15.6 14.0 25.0 18.6 27.0 20.5 66.7 20.0

UNSURE 26 6 5 4 3 2 5 6 5 4 3 2 5 7 3 5 7 4 0 0 0
8.7 10.3 7.8 8.7 12.0 5.7 8.2 12.5 6.8 8.5 12.5 3.9 11.1 8.1 7.5 11.6 9.5 9.1

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.2 2.1 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q25. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new commercial building projects for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 142 97 13 32 9 39 30 43 21 14 10 25 10 16 18 7 8 34
------------- 47.3 51.1 43.3 40.0 47.4 40.6 47.6 50.6 56.8 58.3 37.0 50.0 37.0 43.2 51.4 43.8 34.8 55.7

STRONGLY SUPPORT 86 59 9 18 5 20 21 25 15 6 9 16 5 8 11 3 4 24
28.7 31.1 30.0 22.5 26.3 20.8 33.3 29.4 40.5 25.0 33.3 32.0 18.5 21.6 31.4 18.8 17.4 39.3

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 56 38 4 14 4 19 9 18 6 8 1 9 5 8 7 4 4 10
18.7 20.0 13.3 17.5 21.1 19.8 14.3 21.2 16.2 33.3 3.7 18.0 18.5 21.6 20.0 25.0 17.4 16.4

OPPOSE [NET] 131 76 14 41 9 45 27 36 14 8 14 17 14 19 15 8 12 24
------------ 43.7 40.0 46.7 51.3 47.4 46.9 42.9 42.4 37.8 33.3 51.9 34.0 51.9 51.4 42.9 50.0 52.2 39.3

STRONGLY OPPOSE 68 42 9 17 3 23 14 19 9 3 8 10 5 14 4 3 6 15
22.7 22.1 30.0 21.3 15.8 24.0 22.2 22.4 24.3 12.5 29.6 20.0 18.5 37.8 11.4 18.8 26.1 24.6

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 63 34 5 24 6 22 13 17 5 5 6 7 9 5 11 5 6 9
21.0 17.9 16.7 30.0 31.6 22.9 20.6 20.0 13.5 20.8 22.2 14.0 33.3 13.5 31.4 31.3 26.1 14.8

UNSURE 26 17 3 6 0 12 6 6 2 2 3 7 3 2 2 1 3 3
8.7 8.9 10.0 7.5 12.5 9.5 7.1 5.4 8.3 11.1 14.0 11.1 5.4 5.7 6.3 13.0 4.9

REFUSED 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 5.3 2.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q25. Would you support or oppose a moratorium in Irvine, banning new commercial building projects for one year? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 142 34 16 58 34 20 29 25 52 54 51 8 99 3 14 15 3 1 141 0 79 63
------------- 47.3 32.1 44.4 69.0 45.9 38.5 40.8 35.2 59.1 56.3 47.7 47.1 49.7 60.0 38.9 44.1 33.3 100.0 47.2 45.4 50.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 86 16 11 37 22 15 13 15 34 34 30 6 63 3 5 8 1 1 85 0 45 41
28.7 15.1 30.6 44.0 29.7 28.8 18.3 21.1 38.6 35.4 28.0 35.3 31.7 60.0 13.9 23.5 11.1 100.0 28.4 25.9 32.5

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 56 18 5 21 12 5 16 10 18 20 21 2 36 0 9 7 2 0 56 0 34 22
18.7 17.0 13.9 25.0 16.2 9.6 22.5 14.1 20.5 20.8 19.6 11.8 18.1 25.0 20.6 22.2 18.7 19.5 17.5

OPPOSE [NET] 131 67 20 19 25 28 40 44 25 37 42 6 84 2 19 15 5 0 131 0 79 52
------------ 43.7 63.2 55.6 22.6 33.8 53.8 56.3 62.0 28.4 38.5 39.3 35.3 42.2 40.0 52.8 44.1 55.6 43.8 45.4 41.3

STRONGLY OPPOSE 68 40 8 9 11 14 21 27 10 14 24 2 46 0 8 8 4 0 68 0 39 29
22.7 37.7 22.2 10.7 14.9 26.9 29.6 38.0 11.4 14.6 22.4 11.8 23.1 22.2 23.5 44.4 22.7 22.4 23.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 63 27 12 10 14 14 19 17 15 23 18 4 38 2 11 7 1 0 63 0 40 23
21.0 25.5 33.3 11.9 18.9 26.9 26.8 23.9 17.0 24.0 16.8 23.5 19.1 40.0 30.6 20.6 11.1 21.1 23.0 18.3

UNSURE 26 5 0 7 14 4 2 2 11 5 13 3 16 0 2 4 1 0 26 0 15 11
8.7 4.7 8.3 18.9 7.7 2.8 2.8 12.5 5.2 12.1 17.6 8.0 5.6 11.8 11.1 8.7 8.6 8.7

REFUSED 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 2.8 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q26. Would you support or oppose a ballot measure in Irvine that if voted into law, would require all major new development project to come before the voters for approval in
an election? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 151 60 91 57 45 42 48 37 66 105 45 1 27 48 37 39 36 24 39 52
------------- 50.3 41.4 58.7 46.7 46.9 59.2 46.2 47.4 55.9 46.7 60.8 100.0 52.9 45.7 55.2 50.6 42.4 40.0 54.9 61.9

STRONGLY SUPPORT 107 48 59 44 27 30 37 23 47 74 33 0 24 33 26 24 30 18 27 32
35.7 33.1 38.1 36.1 28.1 42.3 35.6 29.5 39.8 32.9 44.6 47.1 31.4 38.8 31.2 35.3 30.0 38.0 38.1

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 44 12 32 13 18 12 11 14 19 31 12 1 3 15 11 15 6 6 12 20
14.7 8.3 20.6 10.7 18.8 16.9 10.6 17.9 16.1 13.8 16.2 100.0 5.9 14.3 16.4 19.5 7.1 10.0 16.9 23.8

OPPOSE [NET] 133 78 55 59 47 24 51 37 45 109 24 0 21 52 27 33 45 33 28 27
------------ 44.3 53.8 35.5 48.4 49.0 33.8 49.0 47.4 38.1 48.4 32.4 41.2 49.5 40.3 42.9 52.9 55.0 39.4 32.1

STRONGLY OPPOSE 86 52 34 43 29 11 37 24 25 69 17 0 13 28 20 25 26 26 15 19
28.7 35.9 21.9 35.2 30.2 15.5 35.6 30.8 21.2 30.7 23.0 25.5 26.7 29.9 32.5 30.6 43.3 21.1 22.6

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 47 26 21 16 18 13 14 13 20 40 7 0 8 24 7 8 19 7 13 8
15.7 17.9 13.5 13.1 18.8 18.3 13.5 16.7 16.9 17.8 9.5 15.7 22.9 10.4 10.4 22.4 11.7 18.3 9.5

UNSURE 13 5 8 5 4 3 4 4 5 10 3 0 1 4 3 5 2 3 3 5
4.3 3.4 5.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 3.8 5.1 4.2 4.4 4.1 2.0 3.8 4.5 6.5 2.4 5.0 4.2 6.0

REFUSED 3 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0
1.0 1.4 0.6 0.8 2.8 1.0 1.7 0.4 2.7 3.9 1.0 2.4 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q26. Would you support or oppose a ballot measure in Irvine that if voted into law, would require all major new development project to come before the voters for approval in
an election? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 151 24 33 26 16 7 38 20 37 26 16 23 22 37 22 20 39 25 2 6 0
------------- 50.3 41.4 51.6 56.5 64.0 20.0 62.3 41.7 50.0 55.3 66.7 45.1 48.9 43.0 55.0 46.5 52.7 56.8 66.7 60.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 107 20 24 20 10 5 22 16 28 21 9 15 12 22 17 11 30 22 2 3 0
35.7 34.5 37.5 43.5 40.0 14.3 36.1 33.3 37.8 44.7 37.5 29.4 26.7 25.6 42.5 25.6 40.5 50.0 66.7 30.0

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 44 4 9 6 6 2 16 4 9 5 7 8 10 15 5 9 9 3 0 3 0
14.7 6.9 14.1 13.0 24.0 5.7 26.2 8.3 12.2 10.6 29.2 15.7 22.2 17.4 12.5 20.9 12.2 6.8 30.0

OPPOSE [NET] 133 32 27 17 7 27 20 26 33 17 7 27 20 45 17 20 29 17 1 4 0
------------ 44.3 55.2 42.2 37.0 28.0 77.1 32.8 54.2 44.6 36.2 29.2 52.9 44.4 52.3 42.5 46.5 39.2 38.6 33.3 40.0

STRONGLY OPPOSE 86 23 20 9 2 18 11 16 27 5 6 17 12 31 11 14 17 11 0 2 0
28.7 39.7 31.3 19.6 8.0 51.4 18.0 33.3 36.5 10.6 25.0 33.3 26.7 36.0 27.5 32.6 23.0 25.0 20.0

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 47 9 7 8 5 9 9 10 6 12 1 10 8 14 6 6 12 6 1 2 0
15.7 15.5 10.9 17.4 20.0 25.7 14.8 20.8 8.1 25.5 4.2 19.6 17.8 16.3 15.0 14.0 16.2 13.6 33.3 20.0

UNSURE 13 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 1 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 0 0 0
4.3 3.4 4.7 2.2 8.0 2.9 4.9 2.1 5.4 4.3 4.2 2.0 6.7 4.7 2.5 7.0 5.4 2.3

REFUSED 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
1.0 1.6 4.3 2.1 4.3 2.7 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q26. Would you support or oppose a ballot measure in Irvine that if voted into law, would require all major new development project to come before the voters for approval in
an election? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 151 96 12 43 12 48 37 39 15 15 15 24 10 19 20 11 12 25
------------- 50.3 50.5 40.0 53.8 63.2 50.0 58.7 45.9 40.5 62.5 55.6 48.0 37.0 51.4 57.1 68.8 52.2 41.0

STRONGLY SUPPORT 107 62 12 33 10 34 26 28 9 8 12 18 5 14 14 11 7 18
35.7 32.6 40.0 41.3 52.6 35.4 41.3 32.9 24.3 33.3 44.4 36.0 18.5 37.8 40.0 68.8 30.4 29.5

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 44 34 0 10 2 14 11 11 6 7 3 6 5 5 6 0 5 7
14.7 17.9 12.5 10.5 14.6 17.5 12.9 16.2 29.2 11.1 12.0 18.5 13.5 17.1 21.7 11.5

OPPOSE [NET] 133 83 17 33 6 43 21 43 20 8 10 21 16 18 11 5 10 34
------------ 44.3 43.7 56.7 41.3 31.6 44.8 33.3 50.6 54.1 33.3 37.0 42.0 59.3 48.6 31.4 31.3 43.5 55.7

STRONGLY OPPOSE 86 55 13 18 4 29 10 28 15 4 6 12 12 14 9 3 6 20
28.7 28.9 43.3 22.5 21.1 30.2 15.9 32.9 40.5 16.7 22.2 24.0 44.4 37.8 25.7 18.8 26.1 32.8

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 47 28 4 15 2 14 11 15 5 4 4 9 4 4 2 2 4 14
15.7 14.7 13.3 18.8 10.5 14.6 17.5 17.6 13.5 16.7 14.8 18.0 14.8 10.8 5.7 12.5 17.4 23.0

UNSURE 13 10 1 2 0 3 5 3 2 0 2 4 1 0 4 0 0 2
4.3 5.3 3.3 2.5 3.1 7.9 3.5 5.4 7.4 8.0 3.7 11.4 3.3

REFUSED 3 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
1.0 0.5 2.5 5.3 2.1 4.2 2.0 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q26. Would you support or oppose a ballot measure in Irvine that if voted into law, would require all major new development project to come before the voters for approval in
an election? And would you say that you strongly or somewhat (agree)?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SUPPORT [NET] 151 37 22 47 45 30 29 22 46 55 58 8 96 3 20 19 5 1 150 0 90 61
------------- 50.3 34.9 61.1 56.0 60.8 57.7 40.8 31.0 52.3 57.3 54.2 47.1 48.2 60.0 55.6 55.9 55.6 100.0 50.2 51.7 48.4

STRONGLY SUPPORT 107 27 16 34 30 21 23 17 26 39 42 6 65 3 16 15 2 1 106 0 66 41
35.7 25.5 44.4 40.5 40.5 40.4 32.4 23.9 29.5 40.6 39.3 35.3 32.7 60.0 44.4 44.1 22.2 100.0 35.5 37.9 32.5

SOMEWHAT SUPPORT 44 10 6 13 15 9 6 5 20 16 16 2 31 0 4 4 3 0 44 0 24 20
14.7 9.4 16.7 15.5 20.3 17.3 8.5 7.0 22.7 16.7 15.0 11.8 15.6 11.1 11.8 33.3 14.7 13.8 15.9

OPPOSE [NET] 133 65 13 35 20 22 41 47 38 39 38 9 94 2 14 12 2 0 133 0 73 60
------------ 44.3 61.3 36.1 41.7 27.0 42.3 57.7 66.2 43.2 40.6 35.5 52.9 47.2 40.0 38.9 35.3 22.2 44.5 42.0 47.6

STRONGLY OPPOSE 86 49 8 19 10 14 31 35 20 22 24 6 63 1 8 6 2 0 86 0 46 40
28.7 46.2 22.2 22.6 13.5 26.9 43.7 49.3 22.7 22.9 22.4 35.3 31.7 20.0 22.2 17.6 22.2 28.8 26.4 31.7

SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 47 16 5 16 10 8 10 12 18 17 14 3 31 1 6 6 0 0 47 0 27 20
15.7 15.1 13.9 19.0 13.5 15.4 14.1 16.9 20.5 17.7 13.1 17.6 15.6 20.0 16.7 17.6 15.7 15.5 15.9

UNSURE 13 3 0 2 8 0 1 2 4 2 8 0 8 0 0 3 2 0 13 0 8 5
4.3 2.8 2.4 10.8 1.4 2.8 4.5 2.1 7.5 4.0 8.8 22.2 4.3 4.6 4.0

REFUSED 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.4 2.8 0.5 5.6 1.0 1.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q27. The election for Mayor of Irvine will be held in November. If the election for Irvine Mayor were held today, for whom would you vote? And would you say that you would
definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

STEVEN CHOI, MAYOR, CITY OF 106 64 42 61 18 25 51 12 43 80 26 0 17 42 23 24 44 20 15 27
IRVINE/BUSINESSMAN [NET] 35.3 44.1 27.1 50.0 18.8 35.2 49.0 15.4 36.4 35.6 35.1 33.3 40.0 34.3 31.2 51.8 33.3 21.1 32.1
---------------------------

DEFINITELY STEVEN CHOI 59 34 25 39 7 12 33 5 21 45 14 0 5 24 11 19 20 14 9 16
19.7 23.4 16.1 32.0 7.3 16.9 31.7 6.4 17.8 20.0 18.9 9.8 22.9 16.4 24.7 23.5 23.3 12.7 19.0

PROBABLY STEVEN CHOI 37 20 17 19 8 9 15 5 17 27 10 0 7 15 10 5 16 4 6 11
12.3 13.8 11.0 15.6 8.3 12.7 14.4 6.4 14.4 12.0 13.5 13.7 14.3 14.9 6.5 18.8 6.7 8.5 13.1

LEAN STEVEN CHOI 10 10 0 3 3 4 3 2 5 8 2 0 5 3 2 0 8 2 0 0
3.3 6.9 2.5 3.1 5.6 2.9 2.6 4.2 3.6 2.7 9.8 2.9 3.0 9.4 3.3

KATHERINE DAIGLE, SMALL 36 17 19 13 12 11 12 8 16 29 7 0 7 12 8 9 9 8 10 9
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 12.0 11.7 12.3 10.7 12.5 15.5 11.5 10.3 13.6 12.9 9.5 13.7 11.4 11.9 11.7 10.6 13.3 14.1 10.7
-----------------------

DEFINITELY KATHERINE 11 7 4 5 1 5 5 1 5 9 2 0 1 2 5 3 2 5 1 3
DAIGLE 3.7 4.8 2.6 4.1 1.0 7.0 4.8 1.3 4.2 4.0 2.7 2.0 1.9 7.5 3.9 2.4 8.3 1.4 3.6

PROBABLY KATHERINE DAIGLE 18 7 11 6 9 3 5 5 8 16 2 0 4 7 3 4 4 3 7 4
6.0 4.8 7.1 4.9 9.4 4.2 4.8 6.4 6.8 7.1 2.7 7.8 6.7 4.5 5.2 4.7 5.0 9.9 4.8

LEAN KATHERINE DAIGLE 7 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 2 2
2.3 2.1 2.6 1.6 2.1 4.2 1.9 2.6 2.5 1.8 4.1 3.9 2.9 2.6 3.5 2.8 2.4

MARY ANN GAIDO, IRVINE 84 31 53 23 42 17 19 37 28 69 15 0 7 26 23 28 11 20 22 31
PLANNING COMMISSIONER 28.0 21.4 34.2 18.9 43.8 23.9 18.3 47.4 23.7 30.7 20.3 13.7 24.8 34.3 36.4 12.9 33.3 31.0 36.9
[NET]
----------------------

DEFINITELY MARY ANN GAIDO 50 17 33 10 31 7 8 27 15 40 10 0 3 17 12 18 5 12 15 18
16.7 11.7 21.3 8.2 32.3 9.9 7.7 34.6 12.7 17.8 13.5 5.9 16.2 17.9 23.4 5.9 20.0 21.1 21.4

PROBABLY MARY ANN GAIDO 27 11 16 11 9 7 9 8 10 22 5 0 2 7 10 8 4 7 5 11
9.0 7.6 10.3 9.0 9.4 9.9 8.7 10.3 8.5 9.8 6.8 3.9 6.7 14.9 10.4 4.7 11.7 7.0 13.1

LEAN MARY ANN GAIDO 7 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 7 0 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2
2.3 2.1 2.6 1.6 2.1 4.2 1.9 2.6 2.5 3.1 3.9 1.9 1.5 2.6 2.4 1.7 2.8 2.4

FIRM UNSURE 64 28 36 22 18 17 19 16 29 40 23 1 18 22 13 11 18 10 22 14
21.3 19.3 23.2 18.0 18.8 23.9 18.3 20.5 24.6 17.8 31.1 100.0 35.3 21.0 19.4 14.3 21.2 16.7 31.0 16.7

REFUSED 10 5 5 3 6 1 3 5 2 7 3 0 2 3 0 5 3 2 2 3
3.3 3.4 3.2 2.5 6.3 1.4 2.9 6.4 1.7 3.1 4.1 3.9 2.9 6.5 3.5 3.3 2.8 3.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q27. The election for Mayor of Irvine will be held in November. If the election for Irvine Mayor were held today, for whom would you vote? And would you say that you would
definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

STEVEN CHOI, MAYOR, CITY OF 106 32 29 20 5 10 8 28 33 18 7 11 7 32 15 13 28 14 1 3 0
IRVINE/BUSINESSMAN [NET] 35.3 55.2 45.3 43.5 20.0 28.6 13.1 58.3 44.6 38.3 29.2 21.6 15.6 37.2 37.5 30.2 37.8 31.8 33.3 30.0
---------------------------

DEFINITELY STEVEN CHOI 59 20 19 8 4 5 2 17 22 7 5 4 3 22 7 8 15 5 0 2 0
19.7 34.5 29.7 17.4 16.0 14.3 3.3 35.4 29.7 14.9 20.8 7.8 6.7 25.6 17.5 18.6 20.3 11.4 20.0

PROBABLY STEVEN CHOI 37 9 10 8 1 2 6 9 10 7 2 5 3 10 7 4 8 7 1 0 0
12.3 15.5 15.6 17.4 4.0 5.7 9.8 18.8 13.5 14.9 8.3 9.8 6.7 11.6 17.5 9.3 10.8 15.9 33.3

LEAN STEVEN CHOI 10 3 0 4 0 3 0 2 1 4 0 2 1 0 1 1 5 2 0 1 0
3.3 5.2 8.7 8.6 4.2 1.4 8.5 3.9 2.2 2.5 2.3 6.8 4.5 10.0

KATHERINE DAIGLE, SMALL 36 7 6 6 5 4 8 5 8 7 4 7 5 4 7 5 9 9 1 1 0
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 12.0 12.1 9.4 13.0 20.0 11.4 13.1 10.4 10.8 14.9 16.7 13.7 11.1 4.7 17.5 11.6 12.2 20.5 33.3 10.0
-----------------------

DEFINITELY KATHERINE 11 3 2 3 2 1 0 1 4 2 3 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 0 0 0
DAIGLE 3.7 5.2 3.1 6.5 8.0 2.9 2.1 5.4 4.3 12.5 2.2 2.3 5.0 4.7 2.7 6.8

PROBABLY KATHERINE DAIGLE 18 3 3 2 1 2 7 2 4 3 0 6 3 1 4 3 5 4 0 1 0
6.0 5.2 4.7 4.3 4.0 5.7 11.5 4.2 5.4 6.4 11.8 6.7 1.2 10.0 7.0 6.8 9.1 10.0

LEAN KATHERINE DAIGLE 7 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 0
2.3 1.7 1.6 2.2 8.0 2.9 1.6 4.2 4.3 4.2 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.5 2.7 4.5 33.3

MARY ANN GAIDO, IRVINE 84 8 15 9 8 14 28 4 19 11 6 16 26 35 12 12 16 6 1 2 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONER 28.0 13.8 23.4 19.6 32.0 40.0 45.9 8.3 25.7 23.4 25.0 31.4 57.8 40.7 30.0 27.9 21.6 13.6 33.3 20.0
[NET]
----------------------

DEFINITELY MARY ANN GAIDO 50 3 7 3 4 11 20 2 8 6 1 10 21 24 8 7 7 2 1 1 0
16.7 5.2 10.9 6.5 16.0 31.4 32.8 4.2 10.8 12.8 4.2 19.6 46.7 27.9 20.0 16.3 9.5 4.5 33.3 10.0

PROBABLY MARY ANN GAIDO 27 5 6 4 3 2 7 2 9 2 5 5 4 11 3 4 6 2 0 1 0
9.0 8.6 9.4 8.7 12.0 5.7 11.5 4.2 12.2 4.3 20.8 9.8 8.9 12.8 7.5 9.3 8.1 4.5 10.0

LEAN MARY ANN GAIDO 7 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0
2.3 3.1 4.3 4.0 2.9 1.6 2.7 6.4 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.3 4.1 4.5

FIRM UNSURE 64 10 12 11 6 3 15 10 12 11 6 13 5 12 5 12 19 12 0 4 0
21.3 17.2 18.8 23.9 24.0 8.6 24.6 20.8 16.2 23.4 25.0 25.5 11.1 14.0 12.5 27.9 25.7 27.3 40.0

REFUSED 10 1 2 0 1 4 2 1 2 0 1 4 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 0 0
3.3 1.7 3.1 4.0 11.4 3.3 2.1 2.7 4.2 7.8 4.4 3.5 2.5 2.3 2.7 6.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q27. The election for Mayor of Irvine will be held in November. If the election for Irvine Mayor were held today, for whom would you vote? And would you say that you would
definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

STEVEN CHOI, MAYOR, CITY OF 106 63 14 29 6 33 20 33 14 10 9 20 9 13 11 6 4 24
IRVINE/BUSINESSMAN [NET] 35.3 33.2 46.7 36.3 31.6 34.4 31.7 38.8 37.8 41.7 33.3 40.0 33.3 35.1 31.4 37.5 17.4 39.3
---------------------------

DEFINITELY STEVEN CHOI 59 38 7 14 3 18 11 17 10 4 7 9 6 10 5 1 1 16
19.7 20.0 23.3 17.5 15.8 18.8 17.5 20.0 27.0 16.7 25.9 18.0 22.2 27.0 14.3 6.3 4.3 26.2

PROBABLY STEVEN CHOI 37 20 7 10 3 11 7 12 4 5 2 10 3 3 6 1 2 5
12.3 10.5 23.3 12.5 15.8 11.5 11.1 14.1 10.8 20.8 7.4 20.0 11.1 8.1 17.1 6.3 8.7 8.2

LEAN STEVEN CHOI 10 5 0 5 0 4 2 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 3
3.3 2.6 6.3 4.2 3.2 4.7 4.2 2.0 25.0 4.3 4.9

KATHERINE DAIGLE, SMALL 36 23 0 13 3 8 11 12 2 2 2 7 2 3 6 3 5 6
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 12.0 12.1 16.3 15.8 8.3 17.5 14.1 5.4 8.3 7.4 14.0 7.4 8.1 17.1 18.8 21.7 9.8
-----------------------

DEFINITELY KATHERINE 11 8 0 3 1 2 2 6 0 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 2 2
DAIGLE 3.7 4.2 3.8 5.3 2.1 3.2 7.1 3.7 3.7 8.1 5.7 8.7 3.3

PROBABLY KATHERINE DAIGLE 18 10 0 8 1 4 6 5 2 2 0 6 1 0 2 3 2 2
6.0 5.3 10.0 5.3 4.2 9.5 5.9 5.4 8.3 12.0 3.7 5.7 18.8 8.7 3.3

LEAN KATHERINE DAIGLE 7 5 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 2
2.3 2.6 2.5 5.3 2.1 4.8 1.2 3.7 2.0 5.7 4.3 3.3

MARY ANN GAIDO, IRVINE 84 55 11 18 3 22 17 27 15 6 9 13 6 14 11 3 7 15
PLANNING COMMISSIONER 28.0 28.9 36.7 22.5 15.8 22.9 27.0 31.8 40.5 25.0 33.3 26.0 22.2 37.8 31.4 18.8 30.4 24.6
[NET]
----------------------

DEFINITELY MARY ANN GAIDO 50 35 8 7 3 11 9 17 10 5 6 5 3 11 6 3 4 7
16.7 18.4 26.7 8.8 15.8 11.5 14.3 20.0 27.0 20.8 22.2 10.0 11.1 29.7 17.1 18.8 17.4 11.5

PROBABLY MARY ANN GAIDO 27 16 3 8 0 7 6 10 4 1 1 7 3 3 3 0 2 7
9.0 8.4 10.0 10.0 7.3 9.5 11.8 10.8 4.2 3.7 14.0 11.1 8.1 8.6 8.7 11.5

LEAN MARY ANN GAIDO 7 4 0 3 0 4 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 1
2.3 2.1 3.8 4.2 3.2 2.7 7.4 2.0 5.7 4.3 1.6

FIRM UNSURE 64 41 4 19 7 26 12 13 6 5 7 10 8 5 6 3 6 14
21.3 21.6 13.3 23.8 36.8 27.1 19.0 15.3 16.2 20.8 25.9 20.0 29.6 13.5 17.1 18.8 26.1 23.0

REFUSED 10 8 1 1 0 7 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 2
3.3 4.2 3.3 1.3 7.3 4.8 4.2 7.4 5.4 2.9 6.3 4.3 3.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q27. The election for Mayor of Irvine will be held in November. If the election for Irvine Mayor were held today, for whom would you vote? And would you say that you would
definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

STEVEN CHOI, MAYOR, CITY OF 106 106 0 0 0 20 42 52 14 20 31 6 72 0 14 12 2 0 106 0 59 47
IRVINE/BUSINESSMAN [NET] 35.3 100.0 38.5 59.2 73.2 15.9 20.8 29.0 35.3 36.2 38.9 35.3 22.2 35.5 33.9 37.3
---------------------------

DEFINITELY STEVEN CHOI 59 59 0 0 0 8 27 39 6 6 15 3 44 0 5 5 2 0 59 0 29 30
19.7 55.7 15.4 38.0 54.9 6.8 6.3 14.0 17.6 22.1 13.9 14.7 22.2 19.7 16.7 23.8

PROBABLY STEVEN CHOI 37 37 0 0 0 9 12 12 6 11 12 3 22 0 6 6 0 0 37 0 24 13
12.3 34.9 17.3 16.9 16.9 6.8 11.5 11.2 17.6 11.1 16.7 17.6 12.4 13.8 10.3

LEAN STEVEN CHOI 10 10 0 0 0 3 3 1 2 3 4 0 6 0 3 1 0 0 10 0 6 4
3.3 9.4 5.8 4.2 1.4 2.3 3.1 3.7 3.0 8.3 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.2

KATHERINE DAIGLE, SMALL 36 0 36 0 0 12 8 7 11 19 7 3 25 1 1 6 0 0 36 0 22 14
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 12.0 100.0 23.1 11.3 9.9 12.5 19.8 6.5 17.6 12.6 20.0 2.8 17.6 12.0 12.6 11.1
-----------------------

DEFINITELY KATHERINE 11 0 11 0 0 3 0 2 4 5 4 1 8 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 5 6
DAIGLE 3.7 30.6 5.8 2.8 4.5 5.2 3.7 5.9 4.0 5.9 3.7 2.9 4.8

PROBABLY KATHERINE DAIGLE 18 0 18 0 0 6 7 3 5 11 2 2 13 1 1 1 0 0 18 0 11 7
6.0 50.0 11.5 9.9 4.2 5.7 11.5 1.9 11.8 6.5 20.0 2.8 2.9 6.0 6.3 5.6

LEAN KATHERINE DAIGLE 7 0 7 0 0 3 1 2 2 3 1 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 6 1
2.3 19.4 5.8 1.4 2.8 2.3 3.1 0.9 2.0 8.8 2.3 3.4 0.8

MARY ANN GAIDO, IRVINE 84 0 0 84 0 16 14 9 53 53 11 3 62 2 10 6 1 0 84 0 44 40
PLANNING COMMISSIONER 28.0 100.0 30.8 19.7 12.7 60.2 55.2 10.3 17.6 31.2 40.0 27.8 17.6 11.1 28.1 25.3 31.7
[NET]
----------------------

DEFINITELY MARY ANN GAIDO 50 0 0 50 0 6 6 3 40 40 2 2 37 1 6 4 0 0 50 0 26 24
16.7 59.5 11.5 8.5 4.2 45.5 41.7 1.9 11.8 18.6 20.0 16.7 11.8 16.7 14.9 19.0

PROBABLY MARY ANN GAIDO 27 0 0 27 0 9 5 4 12 10 7 1 19 1 3 2 1 0 27 0 13 14
9.0 32.1 17.3 7.0 5.6 13.6 10.4 6.5 5.9 9.5 20.0 8.3 5.9 11.1 9.0 7.5 11.1

LEAN MARY ANN GAIDO 7 0 0 7 0 1 3 2 1 3 2 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 5 2
2.3 8.3 1.9 4.2 2.8 1.1 3.1 1.9 3.0 2.8 2.3 2.9 1.6

FIRM UNSURE 64 0 0 0 64 4 6 2 7 3 51 4 36 0 10 9 5 1 63 0 44 20
21.3 86.5 7.7 8.5 2.8 8.0 3.1 47.7 23.5 18.1 27.8 26.5 55.6 100.0 21.1 25.3 15.9

REFUSED 10 0 0 0 10 0 1 1 3 1 7 1 4 2 1 1 1 0 10 0 5 5
3.3 13.5 1.4 1.4 3.4 1.0 6.5 5.9 2.0 40.0 2.8 2.9 11.1 3.3 2.9 4.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

EVAN CHEMERS, IRVINE 52 28 24 23 13 15 19 12 21 45 7 0 11 18 12 11 19 9 10 14
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 17.3 19.3 15.5 18.9 13.5 21.1 18.3 15.4 17.8 20.0 9.5 21.6 17.1 17.9 14.3 22.4 15.0 14.1 16.7
--------------------

DEFINITELY EVAN CHEMERS 15 7 8 9 4 1 9 4 2 13 2 0 2 4 2 7 4 3 2 6
5.0 4.8 5.2 7.4 4.2 1.4 8.7 5.1 1.7 5.8 2.7 3.9 3.8 3.0 9.1 4.7 5.0 2.8 7.1

PROBABLY EVAN CHEMERS 32 18 14 12 7 13 8 6 18 27 5 0 7 12 9 4 13 5 6 8
10.7 12.4 9.0 9.8 7.3 18.3 7.7 7.7 15.3 12.0 6.8 13.7 11.4 13.4 5.2 15.3 8.3 8.5 9.5

LEAN EVAN CHEMERS 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 1 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 2 0
2.0 2.8 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.8 1.9 2.6 1.7 2.2 1.4 3.9 2.9 1.5 3.5 1.7 2.8

LYNN SCHOTT, IRVINE 71 34 37 38 14 17 35 10 26 56 15 0 11 24 17 19 21 13 14 23
COMMISSIONER/EDUCATOR 23.7 23.4 23.9 31.1 14.6 23.9 33.7 12.8 22.0 24.9 20.3 21.6 22.9 25.4 24.7 24.7 21.7 19.7 27.4
[NET]
---------------------

DEFINITELY LYNN SCHOTT 33 18 15 24 4 4 23 2 8 29 4 0 4 9 7 13 10 8 3 12
11.0 12.4 9.7 19.7 4.2 5.6 22.1 2.6 6.8 12.9 5.4 7.8 8.6 10.4 16.9 11.8 13.3 4.2 14.3

PROBABLY LYNN SCHOTT 33 12 21 13 9 10 11 7 15 22 11 0 4 14 10 5 7 5 11 10
11.0 8.3 13.5 10.7 9.4 14.1 10.6 9.0 12.7 9.8 14.9 7.8 13.3 14.9 6.5 8.2 8.3 15.5 11.9

LEAN LYNN SCHOTT 5 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 5 0 0 3 1 0 1 4 0 0 1
1.7 2.8 0.6 0.8 1.0 4.2 1.0 1.3 2.5 2.2 5.9 1.0 1.3 4.7 1.2

JEFF LALLOWAY, IRVINE 71 38 33 48 10 12 43 8 20 56 15 0 9 26 13 23 23 15 12 21
COUNCILMEMBER/BUSINESSMAN 23.7 26.2 21.3 39.3 10.4 16.9 41.3 10.3 16.9 24.9 20.3 17.6 24.8 19.4 29.9 27.1 25.0 16.9 25.0
[NET]
-------------------------

DEFINITELY JEFF LALLOWAY 45 23 22 35 4 5 33 3 9 34 11 0 4 18 7 16 13 10 9 13
15.0 15.9 14.2 28.7 4.2 7.0 31.7 3.8 7.6 15.1 14.9 7.8 17.1 10.4 20.8 15.3 16.7 12.7 15.5

PROBABLY JEFF LALLOWAY 21 11 10 10 4 7 7 3 11 18 3 0 4 6 6 5 8 3 2 8
7.0 7.6 6.5 8.2 4.2 9.9 6.7 3.8 9.3 8.0 4.1 7.8 5.7 9.0 6.5 9.4 5.0 2.8 9.5

LEAN JEFF LALLOWAY 5 4 1 3 2 0 3 2 0 4 1 0 1 2 0 2 2 2 1 0
1.7 2.8 0.6 2.5 2.1 2.9 2.6 1.8 1.4 2.0 1.9 2.6 2.4 3.3 1.4

LARRY AGRAN, IRVINE CITY 88 42 46 27 43 16 22 38 28 70 18 0 10 26 23 29 19 23 17 29
COUNCILMEMBER [NET] 29.3 29.0 29.7 22.1 44.8 22.5 21.2 48.7 23.7 31.1 24.3 19.6 24.8 34.3 37.7 22.4 38.3 23.9 34.5
------------------------

DEFINITELY LARRY AGRAN 55 23 32 17 30 7 13 27 15 44 11 0 5 14 14 22 9 14 10 22
18.3 15.9 20.6 13.9 31.3 9.9 12.5 34.6 12.7 19.6 14.9 9.8 13.3 20.9 28.6 10.6 23.3 14.1 26.2

PROBABLY LARRY AGRAN 28 15 13 8 11 8 7 10 11 22 6 0 3 9 9 7 6 9 6 7
9.3 10.3 8.4 6.6 11.5 11.3 6.7 12.8 9.3 9.8 8.1 5.9 8.6 13.4 9.1 7.1 15.0 8.5 8.3

LEAN LARRY AGRAN 6 4 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 5 1 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 2 0
2.0 2.8 1.3 1.6 3.1 1.4 1.9 2.6 1.7 2.2 1.4 3.9 3.8 4.7 2.8

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

MELISSA FOX, ATTORNEY/ 96 43 53 26 49 18 19 41 36 76 20 0 15 29 24 28 22 21 22 31
IRVINE COMMISSIONER [NET] 32.0 29.7 34.2 21.3 51.0 25.4 18.3 52.6 30.5 33.8 27.0 29.4 27.6 35.8 36.4 25.9 35.0 31.0 36.9
-------------------------

DEFINITELY MELISSA FOX 46 22 24 8 29 8 5 24 17 35 11 0 5 13 13 15 10 12 8 16
15.3 15.2 15.5 6.6 30.2 11.3 4.8 30.8 14.4 15.6 14.9 9.8 12.4 19.4 19.5 11.8 20.0 11.3 19.0

PROBABLY MELISSA FOX 46 19 27 17 19 8 13 17 16 37 9 0 8 15 10 13 10 9 13 14
15.3 13.1 17.4 13.9 19.8 11.3 12.5 21.8 13.6 16.4 12.2 15.7 14.3 14.9 16.9 11.8 15.0 18.3 16.7

LEAN MELISSA FOX 4 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 3 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 1
1.3 1.4 1.3 0.8 1.0 2.8 1.0 2.5 1.8 3.9 1.0 1.5 2.4 1.4 1.2

FIRM UNSURE 84 42 42 29 24 25 23 17 44 57 26 1 20 31 18 15 26 16 25 17
28.0 29.0 27.1 23.8 25.0 35.2 22.1 21.8 37.3 25.3 35.1 100.0 39.2 29.5 26.9 19.5 30.6 26.7 35.2 20.2

REFUSED 23 8 15 11 6 6 11 5 7 14 9 0 3 9 4 7 5 3 7 8
7.7 5.5 9.7 9.0 6.3 8.5 10.6 6.4 5.9 6.2 12.2 5.9 8.6 6.0 9.1 5.9 5.0 9.9 9.5

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

EVAN CHEMERS, IRVINE 52 12 11 10 5 6 7 11 12 9 6 9 4 12 7 10 13 7 0 3 0
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 17.3 20.7 17.2 21.7 20.0 17.1 11.5 22.9 16.2 19.1 25.0 17.6 8.9 14.0 17.5 23.3 17.6 15.9 30.0
--------------------

DEFINITELY EVAN CHEMERS 15 5 4 1 0 1 3 3 6 0 1 3 1 6 1 4 2 2 0 0 0
5.0 8.6 6.3 2.2 2.9 4.9 6.3 8.1 4.2 5.9 2.2 7.0 2.5 9.3 2.7 4.5

PROBABLY EVAN CHEMERS 32 6 6 9 4 3 4 6 6 8 5 5 2 5 6 6 8 4 0 3 0
10.7 10.3 9.4 19.6 16.0 8.6 6.6 12.5 8.1 17.0 20.8 9.8 4.4 5.8 15.0 14.0 10.8 9.1 30.0

LEAN EVAN CHEMERS 6 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
2.0 1.7 1.6 2.2 4.0 5.7 4.2 4.3 2.0 2.2 2.3 4.1 2.3

LYNN SCHOTT, IRVINE 71 16 22 13 4 4 10 14 24 11 6 8 6 22 13 7 16 10 1 2 0
COMMISSIONER/EDUCATOR 23.7 27.6 34.4 28.3 16.0 11.4 16.4 29.2 32.4 23.4 25.0 15.7 13.3 25.6 32.5 16.3 21.6 22.7 33.3 20.0
[NET]
---------------------

DEFINITELY LYNN SCHOTT 33 11 13 4 0 2 2 9 15 2 2 1 3 14 5 4 3 5 1 1 0
11.0 19.0 20.3 8.7 5.7 3.3 18.8 20.3 4.3 8.3 2.0 6.7 16.3 12.5 9.3 4.1 11.4 33.3 10.0

PROBABLY LYNN SCHOTT 33 4 9 7 3 1 8 4 9 7 3 6 3 7 7 3 12 3 0 1 0
11.0 6.9 14.1 15.2 12.0 2.9 13.1 8.3 12.2 14.9 12.5 11.8 6.7 8.1 17.5 7.0 16.2 6.8 10.0

LEAN LYNN SCHOTT 5 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0
1.7 1.7 4.3 4.0 2.9 2.1 4.3 4.2 2.0 1.2 2.5 1.4 4.5

JEFF LALLOWAY, IRVINE 71 24 24 8 4 6 4 21 27 8 4 5 5 25 12 10 13 8 1 2 0
COUNCILMEMBER/BUSINESSMAN 23.7 41.4 37.5 17.4 16.0 17.1 6.6 43.8 36.5 17.0 16.7 9.8 11.1 29.1 30.0 23.3 17.6 18.2 33.3 20.0
[NET]
-------------------------

DEFINITELY JEFF LALLOWAY 45 17 18 3 2 3 1 15 20 3 2 3 1 20 7 5 6 4 1 2 0
15.0 29.3 28.1 6.5 8.0 8.6 1.6 31.3 27.0 6.4 8.3 5.9 2.2 23.3 17.5 11.6 8.1 9.1 33.3 20.0

PROBABLY JEFF LALLOWAY 21 5 5 5 2 1 3 4 6 5 2 1 3 4 4 3 6 4 0 0 0
7.0 8.6 7.8 10.9 8.0 2.9 4.9 8.3 8.1 10.6 8.3 2.0 6.7 4.7 10.0 7.0 8.1 9.1

LEAN JEFF LALLOWAY 5 2 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
1.7 3.4 1.6 5.7 4.2 1.4 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.5 4.7 1.4

LARRY AGRAN, IRVINE CITY 88 15 12 8 8 18 25 8 19 10 6 16 27 34 12 10 19 10 2 1 0
COUNCILMEMBER [NET] 29.3 25.9 18.8 17.4 32.0 51.4 41.0 16.7 25.7 21.3 25.0 31.4 60.0 39.5 30.0 23.3 25.7 22.7 66.7 10.0
------------------------

DEFINITELY LARRY AGRAN 55 9 8 2 5 12 18 3 14 6 1 9 21 27 4 8 10 5 1 0 0
18.3 15.5 12.5 4.3 20.0 34.3 29.5 6.3 18.9 12.8 4.2 17.6 46.7 31.4 10.0 18.6 13.5 11.4 33.3

PROBABLY LARRY AGRAN 28 4 4 5 3 5 6 3 5 3 5 5 6 5 7 3 7 5 0 1 0
9.3 6.9 6.3 10.9 12.0 14.3 9.8 6.3 6.8 6.4 20.8 9.8 13.3 5.8 17.5 7.0 9.5 11.4 10.0

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

LEAN LARRY AGRAN 6 2 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
2.0 3.4 2.2 2.9 3.3 4.2 2.1 5.9 2.3 2.5 2.7 33.3

MELISSA FOX, ATTORNEY/ 96 13 13 11 7 18 31 7 19 16 2 19 30 35 14 9 16 18 2 2 0
IRVINE COMMISSIONER [NET] 32.0 22.4 20.3 23.9 28.0 51.4 50.8 14.6 25.7 34.0 8.3 37.3 66.7 40.7 35.0 20.9 21.6 40.9 66.7 20.0
-------------------------

DEFINITELY MELISSA FOX 46 4 4 4 4 13 16 0 8 7 1 10 19 21 6 5 7 5 1 1 0
15.3 6.9 6.3 8.7 16.0 37.1 26.2 10.8 14.9 4.2 19.6 42.2 24.4 15.0 11.6 9.5 11.4 33.3 10.0

PROBABLY MELISSA FOX 46 8 9 6 2 5 14 6 11 7 1 9 10 14 8 4 8 11 0 1 0
15.3 13.8 14.1 13.0 8.0 14.3 23.0 12.5 14.9 14.9 4.2 17.6 22.2 16.3 20.0 9.3 10.8 25.0 10.0

LEAN MELISSA FOX 4 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0
1.3 1.7 2.2 4.0 1.6 2.1 4.3 2.2 1.4 4.5 33.3

FIRM UNSURE 84 15 14 17 8 6 18 12 17 16 9 17 7 14 9 18 25 14 0 4 0
28.0 25.9 21.9 37.0 32.0 17.1 29.5 25.0 23.0 34.0 37.5 33.3 15.6 16.3 22.5 41.9 33.8 31.8 40.0

REFUSED 23 2 9 3 3 3 3 5 6 3 3 4 2 7 2 1 9 3 0 1 0
7.7 3.4 14.1 6.5 12.0 8.6 4.9 10.4 8.1 6.4 12.5 7.8 4.4 8.1 5.0 2.3 12.2 6.8 10.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

EVAN CHEMERS, IRVINE 52 28 6 18 2 19 9 15 7 1 2 11 6 4 9 2 5 12
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 17.3 14.7 20.0 22.5 10.5 19.8 14.3 17.6 18.9 4.2 7.4 22.0 22.2 10.8 25.7 12.5 21.7 19.7
--------------------

DEFINITELY EVAN CHEMERS 15 8 2 5 0 5 2 4 4 0 1 3 3 0 3 0 0 5
5.0 4.2 6.7 6.3 5.2 3.2 4.7 10.8 3.7 6.0 11.1 8.6 8.2

PROBABLY EVAN CHEMERS 32 19 3 10 2 12 5 10 3 1 1 8 2 4 5 2 5 4
10.7 10.0 10.0 12.5 10.5 12.5 7.9 11.8 8.1 4.2 3.7 16.0 7.4 10.8 14.3 12.5 21.7 6.6

LEAN EVAN CHEMERS 6 2 1 3 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3
2.0 1.1 3.3 3.8 2.1 4.8 1.2 3.7 5.7 4.9

LYNN SCHOTT, IRVINE 71 43 8 20 5 23 9 25 9 7 4 9 5 11 11 6 3 15
COMMISSIONER/EDUCATOR 23.7 22.6 26.7 25.0 26.3 24.0 14.3 29.4 24.3 29.2 14.8 18.0 18.5 29.7 31.4 37.5 13.0 24.6
[NET]
---------------------

DEFINITELY LYNN SCHOTT 33 21 5 7 3 10 2 10 8 3 2 7 2 4 3 1 1 10
11.0 11.1 16.7 8.8 15.8 10.4 3.2 11.8 21.6 12.5 7.4 14.0 7.4 10.8 8.6 6.3 4.3 16.4

PROBABLY LYNN SCHOTT 33 19 3 11 2 10 7 13 1 3 2 1 3 6 7 4 2 5
11.0 10.0 10.0 13.8 10.5 10.4 11.1 15.3 2.7 12.5 7.4 2.0 11.1 16.2 20.0 25.0 8.7 8.2

LEAN LYNN SCHOTT 5 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0
1.7 1.6 2.5 3.1 2.4 4.2 2.0 2.7 2.9 6.3

JEFF LALLOWAY, IRVINE 71 48 10 13 5 23 11 22 10 4 5 11 7 9 10 2 2 21
COUNCILMEMBER/BUSINESSMAN 23.7 25.3 33.3 16.3 26.3 24.0 17.5 25.9 27.0 16.7 18.5 22.0 25.9 24.3 28.6 12.5 8.7 34.4
[NET]
-------------------------

DEFINITELY JEFF LALLOWAY 45 30 7 8 4 11 6 16 8 3 5 4 5 8 4 0 2 14
15.0 15.8 23.3 10.0 21.1 11.5 9.5 18.8 21.6 12.5 18.5 8.0 18.5 21.6 11.4 8.7 23.0

PROBABLY JEFF LALLOWAY 21 16 2 3 0 10 5 4 2 1 0 5 1 1 6 2 0 5
7.0 8.4 6.7 3.8 10.4 7.9 4.7 5.4 4.2 10.0 3.7 2.7 17.1 12.5 8.2

LEAN JEFF LALLOWAY 5 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2
1.7 1.1 3.3 2.5 5.3 2.1 2.4 4.0 3.7 3.3

LARRY AGRAN, IRVINE CITY 88 56 11 21 4 22 22 24 16 8 10 12 8 11 10 4 6 19
COUNCILMEMBER [NET] 29.3 29.5 36.7 26.3 21.1 22.9 34.9 28.2 43.2 33.3 37.0 24.0 29.6 29.7 28.6 25.0 26.1 31.1
------------------------

DEFINITELY LARRY AGRAN 55 35 9 11 3 12 13 13 14 4 7 7 5 8 7 2 3 12
18.3 18.4 30.0 13.8 15.8 12.5 20.6 15.3 37.8 16.7 25.9 14.0 18.5 21.6 20.0 12.5 13.0 19.7

PROBABLY LARRY AGRAN 28 19 2 7 0 8 8 10 2 3 2 5 3 2 3 1 3 6
9.3 10.0 6.7 8.8 8.3 12.7 11.8 5.4 12.5 7.4 10.0 11.1 5.4 8.6 6.3 13.0 9.8

LEAN LARRY AGRAN 6 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1
2.0 1.1 3.3 3.8 5.3 2.1 1.6 2.4 4.2 3.7 2.7 2.9 6.3 1.6

MELISSA FOX, ATTORNEY/ 96 62 10 24 8 22 21 32 13 6 11 13 7 11 14 8 11 15
IRVINE COMMISSIONER [NET] 32.0 32.6 33.3 30.0 42.1 22.9 33.3 37.6 35.1 25.0 40.7 26.0 25.9 29.7 40.0 50.0 47.8 24.6
-------------------------

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

DEFINITELY MELISSA FOX 46 30 7 9 4 11 8 14 9 3 6 6 3 7 7 1 6 7
15.3 15.8 23.3 11.3 21.1 11.5 12.7 16.5 24.3 12.5 22.2 12.0 11.1 18.9 20.0 6.3 26.1 11.5

PROBABLY MELISSA FOX 46 30 3 13 3 10 12 17 4 3 4 6 4 4 6 7 5 7
15.3 15.8 10.0 16.3 15.8 10.4 19.0 20.0 10.8 12.5 14.8 12.0 14.8 10.8 17.1 43.8 21.7 11.5

LEAN MELISSA FOX 4 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
1.3 1.1 2.5 5.3 1.0 1.6 1.2 3.7 2.0 2.9 1.6

FIRM UNSURE 84 55 5 24 5 30 20 22 7 8 9 16 8 11 6 4 4 18
28.0 28.9 16.7 30.0 26.3 31.3 31.7 25.9 18.9 33.3 33.3 32.0 29.6 29.7 17.1 25.0 17.4 29.5

REFUSED 23 15 2 6 2 10 6 3 2 3 1 5 2 3 1 1 5 2
7.7 7.9 6.7 7.5 10.5 10.4 9.5 3.5 5.4 12.5 3.7 10.0 7.4 8.1 2.9 6.3 21.7 3.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

EVAN CHEMERS, IRVINE 52 20 12 16 4 52 4 19 11 15 0 2 38 0 7 5 0 0 52 0 33 19
BUSINESS OWNER [NET] 17.3 18.9 33.3 19.0 5.4 100.0 5.6 26.8 12.5 15.6 11.8 19.1 19.4 14.7 17.4 19.0 15.1
--------------------

DEFINITELY EVAN CHEMERS 15 4 2 7 2 15 0 4 4 5 0 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 15 0 6 9
5.0 3.8 5.6 8.3 2.7 28.8 5.6 4.5 5.2 6.5 5.6 5.0 3.4 7.1

PROBABLY EVAN CHEMERS 32 14 8 8 2 32 4 11 7 9 0 1 23 0 5 3 0 0 32 0 22 10
10.7 13.2 22.2 9.5 2.7 61.5 5.6 15.5 8.0 9.4 5.9 11.6 13.9 8.8 10.7 12.6 7.9

LEAN EVAN CHEMERS 6 2 3 1 0 6 0 4 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 6 0
2.0 1.9 8.3 1.2 11.5 5.6 1.0 5.9 1.5 5.9 2.0 3.4

LYNN SCHOTT, IRVINE 71 42 8 14 7 4 71 35 13 19 0 4 49 1 10 6 1 0 71 0 37 34
COMMISSIONER/EDUCATOR 23.7 39.6 22.2 16.7 9.5 7.7 100.0 49.3 14.8 19.8 23.5 24.6 20.0 27.8 17.6 11.1 23.7 21.3 27.0
[NET]
---------------------

DEFINITELY LYNN SCHOTT 33 27 2 2 2 1 33 26 2 4 0 2 26 0 0 4 1 0 33 0 15 18
11.0 25.5 5.6 2.4 2.7 1.9 46.5 36.6 2.3 4.2 11.8 13.1 11.8 11.1 11.0 8.6 14.3

PROBABLY LYNN SCHOTT 33 14 5 11 3 3 33 9 7 14 0 2 20 0 9 2 0 0 33 0 19 14
11.0 13.2 13.9 13.1 4.1 5.8 46.5 12.7 8.0 14.6 11.8 10.1 25.0 5.9 11.0 10.9 11.1

LEAN LYNN SCHOTT 5 1 1 1 2 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 0.9 2.8 1.2 2.7 7.0 4.5 1.0 1.5 20.0 2.8 1.7 1.7 1.6

JEFF LALLOWAY, IRVINE 71 52 7 9 3 19 35 71 7 8 0 4 50 0 8 8 1 0 71 0 39 32
COUNCILMEMBER/BUSINESSMAN 23.7 49.1 19.4 10.7 4.1 36.5 49.3 100.0 8.0 8.3 23.5 25.1 22.2 23.5 11.1 23.7 22.4 25.4
[NET]
-------------------------

DEFINITELY JEFF LALLOWAY 45 37 2 5 1 8 29 45 4 2 0 2 35 0 4 3 1 0 45 0 21 24
15.0 34.9 5.6 6.0 1.4 15.4 40.8 63.4 4.5 2.1 11.8 17.6 11.1 8.8 11.1 15.1 12.1 19.0

PROBABLY JEFF LALLOWAY 21 13 3 4 1 8 6 21 2 5 0 1 13 0 3 4 0 0 21 0 15 6
7.0 12.3 8.3 4.8 1.4 15.4 8.5 29.6 2.3 5.2 5.9 6.5 8.3 11.8 7.0 8.6 4.8

LEAN JEFF LALLOWAY 5 2 2 0 1 3 0 5 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 1.9 5.6 1.4 5.8 7.0 1.1 1.0 5.9 1.0 2.8 2.9 1.7 1.7 1.6

LARRY AGRAN, IRVINE CITY 88 14 11 53 10 11 13 7 88 54 0 5 64 3 8 7 1 0 88 0 44 44
COUNCILMEMBER [NET] 29.3 13.2 30.6 63.1 13.5 21.2 18.3 9.9 100.0 56.3 29.4 32.2 60.0 22.2 20.6 11.1 29.4 25.3 34.9
------------------------

DEFINITELY LARRY AGRAN 55 7 3 41 4 3 3 5 55 42 0 3 41 2 4 4 1 0 55 0 26 29
18.3 6.6 8.3 48.8 5.4 5.8 4.2 7.0 62.5 43.8 17.6 20.6 40.0 11.1 11.8 11.1 18.4 14.9 23.0

PROBABLY LARRY AGRAN 28 6 6 11 5 8 7 2 28 9 0 2 19 0 4 2 1 0 28 0 15 13
9.3 5.7 16.7 13.1 6.8 15.4 9.9 2.8 31.8 9.4 11.8 9.5 11.1 5.9 11.1 9.4 8.6 10.3

LEAN LARRY AGRAN 6 1 2 1 2 0 3 0 6 3 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 6 0 4 2
2.0 0.9 5.6 1.2 2.7 4.2 6.8 3.1 2.0 20.0 2.9 2.0 2.3 1.6

MELISSA FOX, ATTORNEY/ 96 20 19 53 4 15 19 8 54 96 0 5 66 2 13 10 0 0 96 0 53 43
IRVINE COMMISSIONER [NET] 32.0 18.9 52.8 63.1 5.4 28.8 26.8 11.3 61.4 100.0 29.4 33.2 40.0 36.1 29.4 32.1 30.5 34.1
-------------------------

Continued
City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q28. The election for Irvine City Council will be held in November. Two seats are up for election. If the election for Irvine City Council were held today, for whom would you
vote? And would you say that you would definitely vote for _____ or probably vote for _____? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

DEFINITELY MELISSA FOX 46 4 5 35 2 3 5 2 36 46 0 3 33 2 4 4 0 0 46 0 21 25
15.3 3.8 13.9 41.7 2.7 5.8 7.0 2.8 40.9 47.9 17.6 16.6 40.0 11.1 11.8 15.4 12.1 19.8

PROBABLY MELISSA FOX 46 16 11 17 2 11 12 6 17 46 0 2 31 0 8 5 0 0 46 0 28 18
15.3 15.1 30.6 20.2 2.7 21.2 16.9 8.5 19.3 47.9 11.8 15.6 22.2 14.7 15.4 16.1 14.3

LEAN MELISSA FOX 4 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 4 0
1.3 8.3 1.2 1.9 2.8 1.1 4.2 1.0 2.8 2.9 1.3 2.3

FIRM UNSURE 84 23 5 9 47 0 0 0 0 0 84 6 50 1 9 15 3 1 83 0 56 28
28.0 21.7 13.9 10.7 63.5 78.5 35.3 25.1 20.0 25.0 44.1 33.3 100.0 27.8 32.2 22.2

REFUSED 23 8 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 13 1 3 1 4 0 23 0 12 11
7.7 7.5 5.6 2.4 14.9 21.5 5.9 6.5 20.0 8.3 2.9 44.4 7.7 6.9 8.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q29. Conservative pro-growth Republicans Steven Choi, Jeffrey Lalloway and Lynn Schott are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will vote elect all three of
them. Liberal slow-growth Democrats Mary Ann Gaido, Larry Agran and Melissa Fox are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will elect all three of them. If the
election for mayor and city council were held today, which slate would you choose? And would you say that you would definitely vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican
slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate) or probably vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate)? Would you say that you lean
one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONSERVATIVE PRO-GROWTH 114 65 49 75 12 24 68 9 37 89 25 0 18 43 22 31 44 21 17 32
REPUBLICAN SLATE [NET] 38.0 44.8 31.6 61.5 12.5 33.8 65.4 11.5 31.4 39.6 33.8 35.3 41.0 32.8 40.3 51.8 35.0 23.9 38.1
-----------------------

DEFINITELY CONSERVATIVE 74 43 31 56 6 11 50 5 19 59 15 0 7 24 17 26 25 18 6 25
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 24.7 29.7 20.0 45.9 6.3 15.5 48.1 6.4 16.1 26.2 20.3 13.7 22.9 25.4 33.8 29.4 30.0 8.5 29.8
SLATE

PROBABLY CONSERVATIVE 31 16 15 14 4 12 13 2 16 22 9 0 9 16 5 1 15 1 10 5
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 10.3 11.0 9.7 11.5 4.2 16.9 12.5 2.6 13.6 9.8 12.2 17.6 15.2 7.5 1.3 17.6 1.7 14.1 6.0
SLATE

LEAN CONSERVATIVE 9 6 3 5 2 1 5 2 2 8 1 0 2 3 0 4 4 2 1 2
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 3.0 4.1 1.9 4.1 2.1 1.4 4.8 2.6 1.7 3.6 1.4 3.9 2.9 5.2 4.7 3.3 1.4 2.4
SLATE

LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 123 54 69 22 67 30 17 54 52 93 29 1 26 38 30 29 26 28 38 31
DEMOCRATIC SLATE [NET] 41.0 37.2 44.5 18.0 69.8 42.3 16.3 69.2 44.1 41.3 39.2 100.0 51.0 36.2 44.8 37.7 30.6 46.7 53.5 36.9
----------------------

DEFINITELY LIBERAL 79 33 46 12 51 14 10 44 25 62 17 0 12 22 20 25 13 20 21 25
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 26.3 22.8 29.7 9.8 53.1 19.7 9.6 56.4 21.2 27.6 23.0 23.5 21.0 29.9 32.5 15.3 33.3 29.6 29.8
SLATE

PROBABLY LIBERAL 36 15 21 9 13 13 6 9 21 25 10 1 10 12 10 4 7 8 15 6
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 12.0 10.3 13.5 7.4 13.5 18.3 5.8 11.5 17.8 11.1 13.5 100.0 19.6 11.4 14.9 5.2 8.2 13.3 21.1 7.1
SLATE

LEAN LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 8 6 2 1 3 3 1 1 6 6 2 0 4 4 0 0 6 0 2 0
DEMOCRATIC SLATE 2.7 4.1 1.3 0.8 3.1 4.2 1.0 1.3 5.1 2.7 2.7 7.8 3.8 7.1 2.8

CHOOSE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE 15 6 9 4 4 6 3 4 8 11 4 0 2 5 7 1 4 2 3 6
5.0 4.1 5.8 3.3 4.2 8.5 2.9 5.1 6.8 4.9 5.4 3.9 4.8 10.4 1.3 4.7 3.3 4.2 7.1

FIRM UNSURE 30 11 19 12 7 9 10 5 15 20 10 0 3 13 7 7 7 4 9 10
10.0 7.6 12.3 9.8 7.3 12.7 9.6 6.4 12.7 8.9 13.5 5.9 12.4 10.4 9.1 8.2 6.7 12.7 11.9

REFUSED 18 9 9 9 6 2 6 6 6 12 6 0 2 6 1 9 4 5 4 5
6.0 6.2 5.8 7.4 6.3 2.8 5.8 7.7 5.1 5.3 8.1 3.9 5.7 1.5 11.7 4.7 8.3 5.6 6.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q29. Conservative pro-growth Republicans Steven Choi, Jeffrey Lalloway and Lynn Schott are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will vote elect all three of
them. Liberal slow-growth Democrats Mary Ann Gaido, Larry Agran and Melissa Fox are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will elect all three of them. If the
election for mayor and city council were held today, which slate would you choose? And would you say that you would definitely vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican
slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate) or probably vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate)? Would you say that you lean
one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONSERVATIVE PRO-GROWTH 114 37 38 18 6 7 5 32 43 18 6 8 4 36 18 16 23 16 1 4 0
REPUBLICAN SLATE [NET] 38.0 63.8 59.4 39.1 24.0 20.0 8.2 66.7 58.1 38.3 25.0 15.7 8.9 41.9 45.0 37.2 31.1 36.4 33.3 40.0
-----------------------

DEFINITELY CONSERVATIVE 74 27 29 9 2 6 0 20 36 6 5 4 2 31 12 10 11 9 0 1 0
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 24.7 46.6 45.3 19.6 8.0 17.1 41.7 48.6 12.8 20.8 7.8 4.4 36.0 30.0 23.3 14.9 20.5 10.0
SLATE

PROBABLY CONSERVATIVE 31 6 8 8 4 1 3 10 4 11 1 3 1 3 3 5 11 6 1 2 0
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 10.3 10.3 12.5 17.4 16.0 2.9 4.9 20.8 5.4 23.4 4.2 5.9 2.2 3.5 7.5 11.6 14.9 13.6 33.3 20.0
SLATE

LEAN CONSERVATIVE 9 4 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 0 1 0
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 3.0 6.9 1.6 2.2 3.3 4.2 4.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.3 7.5 2.3 1.4 2.3 10.0
SLATE

LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 123 10 12 18 12 24 43 8 14 19 11 33 34 35 17 16 28 20 2 5 0
DEMOCRATIC SLATE [NET] 41.0 17.2 18.8 39.1 48.0 68.6 70.5 16.7 18.9 40.4 45.8 64.7 75.6 40.7 42.5 37.2 37.8 45.5 66.7 50.0
----------------------

DEFINITELY LIBERAL 79 3 9 8 6 21 30 3 9 8 6 21 30 27 11 9 18 11 0 3 0
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 26.3 5.2 14.1 17.4 24.0 60.0 49.2 6.3 12.2 17.0 25.0 41.2 66.7 31.4 27.5 20.9 24.3 25.0 30.0
SLATE

PROBABLY LIBERAL 36 6 3 7 6 2 11 4 5 8 5 9 4 6 5 4 9 8 2 2 0
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 12.0 10.3 4.7 15.2 24.0 5.7 18.0 8.3 6.8 17.0 20.8 17.6 8.9 7.0 12.5 9.3 12.2 18.2 66.7 20.0
SLATE

LEAN LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 8 1 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 3 0 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 0
DEMOCRATIC SLATE 2.7 1.7 6.5 2.9 3.3 2.1 6.4 5.9 2.3 2.5 7.0 1.4 2.3

CHOOSE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE 15 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 1 3 8 1 0 0 0
5.0 3.4 3.1 6.5 12.0 2.9 4.9 2.1 4.1 6.4 12.5 5.9 2.2 2.3 2.5 7.0 10.8 2.3

FIRM UNSURE 30 3 9 6 3 1 6 4 8 6 3 4 3 7 3 5 11 3 0 1 0
10.0 5.2 14.1 13.0 12.0 2.9 9.8 8.3 10.8 12.8 12.5 7.8 6.7 8.1 7.5 11.6 14.9 6.8 10.0

REFUSED 18 6 3 1 1 2 4 3 6 1 1 3 3 6 1 3 4 4 0 0 0
6.0 10.3 4.7 2.2 4.0 5.7 6.6 6.3 8.1 2.1 4.2 5.9 6.7 7.0 2.5 7.0 5.4 9.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q29. Conservative pro-growth Republicans Steven Choi, Jeffrey Lalloway and Lynn Schott are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will vote elect all three of
them. Liberal slow-growth Democrats Mary Ann Gaido, Larry Agran and Melissa Fox are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will elect all three of them. If the
election for mayor and city council were held today, which slate would you choose? And would you say that you would definitely vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican
slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate) or probably vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate)? Would you say that you lean
one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONSERVATIVE PRO-GROWTH 114 76 14 24 8 36 22 33 15 10 9 21 11 15 9 4 8 27
REPUBLICAN SLATE [NET] 38.0 40.0 46.7 30.0 42.1 37.5 34.9 38.8 40.5 41.7 33.3 42.0 40.7 40.5 25.7 25.0 34.8 44.3
-----------------------

DEFINITELY CONSERVATIVE 74 48 11 15 3 22 15 20 14 3 9 15 7 10 6 2 3 19
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 24.7 25.3 36.7 18.8 15.8 22.9 23.8 23.5 37.8 12.5 33.3 30.0 25.9 27.0 17.1 12.5 13.0 31.1
SLATE

PROBABLY CONSERVATIVE 31 20 2 9 3 12 7 8 1 5 0 3 4 3 3 2 4 7
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 10.3 10.5 6.7 11.3 15.8 12.5 11.1 9.4 2.7 20.8 6.0 14.8 8.1 8.6 12.5 17.4 11.5
SLATE

LEAN CONSERVATIVE 9 8 1 0 2 2 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 1
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 3.0 4.2 3.3 10.5 2.1 5.9 8.3 6.0 5.4 4.3 1.6
SLATE

LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 123 72 10 41 7 43 27 32 14 13 11 16 10 12 18 8 9 26
DEMOCRATIC SLATE [NET] 41.0 37.9 33.3 51.3 36.8 44.8 42.9 37.6 37.8 54.2 40.7 32.0 37.0 32.4 51.4 50.0 39.1 42.6
----------------------

DEFINITELY LIBERAL 79 49 8 22 2 26 20 20 11 6 6 11 6 10 12 3 6 19
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 26.3 25.8 26.7 27.5 10.5 27.1 31.7 23.5 29.7 25.0 22.2 22.0 22.2 27.0 34.3 18.8 26.1 31.1
SLATE

PROBABLY LIBERAL 36 20 2 14 3 14 6 10 3 6 5 4 4 2 4 4 2 5
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 12.0 10.5 6.7 17.5 15.8 14.6 9.5 11.8 8.1 25.0 18.5 8.0 14.8 5.4 11.4 25.0 8.7 8.2
SLATE

LEAN LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 8 3 0 5 2 3 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 2
DEMOCRATIC SLATE 2.7 1.6 6.3 10.5 3.1 1.6 2.4 4.2 2.0 5.7 6.3 4.3 3.3

CHOOSE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE 15 9 0 6 0 3 5 5 2 0 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 4
5.0 4.7 7.5 3.1 7.9 5.9 5.4 3.7 2.0 3.7 8.1 5.7 12.5 4.3 6.6

FIRM UNSURE 30 19 5 6 2 8 7 11 2 1 6 9 3 2 4 1 2 2
10.0 10.0 16.7 7.5 10.5 8.3 11.1 12.9 5.4 4.2 22.2 18.0 11.1 5.4 11.4 6.3 8.7 3.3

REFUSED 18 14 1 3 2 6 2 4 4 0 0 3 2 5 2 1 3 2
6.0 7.4 3.3 3.8 10.5 6.3 3.2 4.7 10.8 6.0 7.4 13.5 5.7 6.3 13.0 3.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q29. Conservative pro-growth Republicans Steven Choi, Jeffrey Lalloway and Lynn Schott are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will vote elect all three of
them. Liberal slow-growth Democrats Mary Ann Gaido, Larry Agran and Melissa Fox are running together as a slate and are hoping that voters will elect all three of them. If the
election for mayor and city council were held today, which slate would you choose? And would you say that you would definitely vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican
slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate) or probably vote for (Conservative pro-growth Republican slate/ Liberal slow-growth Democratic slate)? Would you say that you lean
one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CONSERVATIVE PRO-GROWTH 114 83 6 9 16 20 42 55 16 17 38 5 84 0 11 12 2 0 114 0 61 53
REPUBLICAN SLATE [NET] 38.0 78.3 16.7 10.7 21.6 38.5 59.2 77.5 18.2 17.7 35.5 29.4 42.2 30.6 35.3 22.2 38.1 35.1 42.1
-----------------------

DEFINITELY CONSERVATIVE 74 57 3 6 8 11 35 42 10 8 20 4 57 0 4 7 2 0 74 0 34 40
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 24.7 53.8 8.3 7.1 10.8 21.2 49.3 59.2 11.4 8.3 18.7 23.5 28.6 11.1 20.6 22.2 24.7 19.5 31.7
SLATE

PROBABLY CONSERVATIVE 31 22 2 2 5 8 6 11 5 8 12 1 19 0 6 5 0 0 31 0 24 7
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 10.3 20.8 5.6 2.4 6.8 15.4 8.5 15.5 5.7 8.3 11.2 5.9 9.5 16.7 14.7 10.4 13.8 5.6
SLATE

LEAN CONSERVATIVE 9 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 9 0 3 6
PRO-GROWTH REPUBLICAN 3.0 3.8 2.8 1.2 4.1 1.9 1.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 5.6 4.0 2.8 3.0 1.7 4.8
SLATE

LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 123 14 24 64 21 17 21 9 65 67 32 9 78 4 18 13 1 0 123 0 79 44
DEMOCRATIC SLATE [NET] 41.0 13.2 66.7 76.2 28.4 32.7 29.6 12.7 73.9 69.8 29.9 52.9 39.2 80.0 50.0 38.2 11.1 41.1 45.4 34.9
----------------------

DEFINITELY LIBERAL 79 5 10 50 14 8 9 3 53 47 18 4 52 4 12 7 0 0 79 0 46 33
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 26.3 4.7 27.8 59.5 18.9 15.4 12.7 4.2 60.2 49.0 16.8 23.5 26.1 80.0 33.3 20.6 26.4 26.4 26.2
SLATE

PROBABLY LIBERAL 36 7 10 14 5 6 10 4 11 17 12 4 21 0 5 5 1 0 36 0 25 11
SLOW-GROWTH DEMOCRATIC 12.0 6.6 27.8 16.7 6.8 11.5 14.1 5.6 12.5 17.7 11.2 23.5 10.6 13.9 14.7 11.1 12.0 14.4 8.7
SLATE

LEAN LIBERAL SLOW-GROWTH 8 2 4 0 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 5 0 1 1 0 0 8 0 8 0
DEMOCRATIC SLATE 2.7 1.9 11.1 2.7 5.8 2.8 2.8 1.1 3.1 1.9 5.9 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7 4.6

CHOOSE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE 15 5 3 2 5 6 4 1 3 6 5 1 8 0 2 4 0 0 15 0 8 7
5.0 4.7 8.3 2.4 6.8 11.5 5.6 1.4 3.4 6.3 4.7 5.9 4.0 5.6 11.8 5.0 4.6 5.6

FIRM UNSURE 30 1 1 5 23 5 2 5 2 2 21 1 17 0 3 5 4 1 29 0 18 12
10.0 0.9 2.8 6.0 31.1 9.6 2.8 7.0 2.3 2.1 19.6 5.9 8.5 8.3 14.7 44.4 100.0 9.7 10.3 9.5

REFUSED 18 3 2 4 9 4 2 1 2 4 11 1 12 1 2 0 2 0 18 0 8 10
6.0 2.8 5.6 4.8 12.2 7.7 2.8 1.4 2.3 4.2 10.3 5.9 6.0 20.0 5.6 22.2 6.0 4.6 7.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q30. Councilman Larry Agran has received well over half a million dollars in city paychecks and benefits from Irvine taxpayers over the last five decades he has served on the
City Council, starting in 1978. Does knowing this make you more likely or less likely to vote for Larry Agran for Irvine City Council? And would you say that you are much
[more likely/less likely] or somewhat [more likely/less likely]?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MORE LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 61 27 34 17 31 11 15 29 17 46 15 0 11 18 12 20 12 15 17 17
[NET] 20.3 18.6 21.9 13.9 32.3 15.5 14.4 37.2 14.4 20.4 20.3 21.6 17.1 17.9 26.0 14.1 25.0 23.9 20.2
-----------------------

MUCH MORE LIKELY 30 13 17 7 18 5 7 16 7 24 6 0 4 7 8 11 5 8 6 11
10.0 9.0 11.0 5.7 18.8 7.0 6.7 20.5 5.9 10.7 8.1 7.8 6.7 11.9 14.3 5.9 13.3 8.5 13.1

SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 31 14 17 10 13 6 8 13 10 22 9 0 7 11 4 9 7 7 11 6
10.3 9.7 11.0 8.2 13.5 8.5 7.7 16.7 8.5 9.8 12.2 13.7 10.5 6.0 11.7 8.2 11.7 15.5 7.1

MAKES NO DIFFERENCE 76 44 32 24 30 19 20 24 32 62 14 0 11 30 20 15 27 17 14 18
25.3 30.3 20.6 19.7 31.3 26.8 19.2 30.8 27.1 27.6 18.9 21.6 28.6 29.9 19.5 31.8 28.3 19.7 21.4

LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 126 57 69 68 26 27 59 18 49 96 29 1 23 43 28 32 34 23 32 37
[NET] 42.0 39.3 44.5 55.7 27.1 38.0 56.7 23.1 41.5 42.7 39.2 100.0 45.1 41.0 41.8 41.6 40.0 38.3 45.1 44.0
-----------------------

MUCH LESS LIKELY 83 39 44 50 13 15 44 10 29 65 17 1 12 22 20 29 21 18 13 31
27.7 26.9 28.4 41.0 13.5 21.1 42.3 12.8 24.6 28.9 23.0 100.0 23.5 21.0 29.9 37.7 24.7 30.0 18.3 36.9

SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 43 18 25 18 13 12 15 8 20 31 12 0 11 21 8 3 13 5 19 6
14.3 12.4 16.1 14.8 13.5 16.9 14.4 10.3 16.9 13.8 16.2 21.6 20.0 11.9 3.9 15.3 8.3 26.8 7.1

UNSURE 24 11 13 6 8 9 6 6 12 13 11 0 5 10 3 6 9 2 6 7
8.0 7.6 8.4 4.9 8.3 12.7 5.8 7.7 10.2 5.8 14.9 9.8 9.5 4.5 7.8 10.6 3.3 8.5 8.3

REFUSED 13 6 7 7 1 5 4 1 8 8 5 0 1 4 4 4 3 3 2 5
4.3 4.1 4.5 5.7 1.0 7.0 3.8 1.3 6.8 3.6 6.8 2.0 3.8 6.0 5.2 3.5 5.0 2.8 6.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q30. Councilman Larry Agran has received well over half a million dollars in city paychecks and benefits from Irvine taxpayers over the last five decades he has served on the
City Council, starting in 1978. Does knowing this make you more likely or less likely to vote for Larry Agran for Irvine City Council? And would you say that you are much
[more likely/less likely] or somewhat [more likely/less likely]?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MORE LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 61 10 7 4 7 12 19 5 12 7 4 15 16 19 8 8 16 8 1 1 0
[NET] 20.3 17.2 10.9 8.7 28.0 34.3 31.1 10.4 16.2 14.9 16.7 29.4 35.6 22.1 20.0 18.6 21.6 18.2 33.3 10.0
-----------------------

MUCH MORE LIKELY 30 3 4 3 2 7 11 1 6 2 3 8 10 11 6 4 5 3 0 1 0
10.0 5.2 6.3 6.5 8.0 20.0 18.0 2.1 8.1 4.3 12.5 15.7 22.2 12.8 15.0 9.3 6.8 6.8 10.0

SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 31 7 3 1 5 5 8 4 6 5 1 7 6 8 2 4 11 5 1 0 0
10.3 12.1 4.7 2.2 20.0 14.3 13.1 8.3 8.1 10.6 4.2 13.7 13.3 9.3 5.0 9.3 14.9 11.4 33.3

MAKES NO DIFFERENCE 76 15 9 13 6 14 16 14 10 13 6 12 18 21 13 13 18 9 0 2 0
25.3 25.9 14.1 28.3 24.0 40.0 26.2 29.2 13.5 27.7 25.0 23.5 40.0 24.4 32.5 30.2 24.3 20.5 20.0

LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 126 27 41 20 7 7 19 23 45 20 7 18 8 37 16 15 29 21 2 6 0
[NET] 42.0 46.6 64.1 43.5 28.0 20.0 31.1 47.9 60.8 42.6 29.2 35.3 17.8 43.0 40.0 34.9 39.2 47.7 66.7 60.0
-----------------------

MUCH LESS LIKELY 83 19 31 11 4 6 7 12 38 10 5 7 6 30 11 11 16 11 1 3 0
27.7 32.8 48.4 23.9 16.0 17.1 11.5 25.0 51.4 21.3 20.8 13.7 13.3 34.9 27.5 25.6 21.6 25.0 33.3 30.0

SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 43 8 10 9 3 1 12 11 7 10 2 11 2 7 5 4 13 10 1 3 0
14.3 13.8 15.6 19.6 12.0 2.9 19.7 22.9 9.5 21.3 8.3 21.6 4.4 8.1 12.5 9.3 17.6 22.7 33.3 30.0

UNSURE 24 2 4 7 2 2 6 3 3 6 3 5 3 6 2 4 7 5 0 0 0
8.0 3.4 6.3 15.2 8.0 5.7 9.8 6.3 4.1 12.8 12.5 9.8 6.7 7.0 5.0 9.3 9.5 11.4

REFUSED 13 4 3 2 3 0 1 3 4 1 4 1 0 3 1 3 4 1 0 1 0
4.3 6.9 4.7 4.3 12.0 1.6 6.3 5.4 2.1 16.7 2.0 3.5 2.5 7.0 5.4 2.3 10.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q30. Councilman Larry Agran has received well over half a million dollars in city paychecks and benefits from Irvine taxpayers over the last five decades he has served on the
City Council, starting in 1978. Does knowing this make you more likely or less likely to vote for Larry Agran for Irvine City Council? And would you say that you are much
[more likely/less likely] or somewhat [more likely/less likely]?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MORE LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 61 37 5 19 4 19 14 16 8 3 4 9 6 8 9 2 5 15
[NET] 20.3 19.5 16.7 23.8 21.1 19.8 22.2 18.8 21.6 12.5 14.8 18.0 22.2 21.6 25.7 12.5 21.7 24.6
-----------------------

MUCH MORE LIKELY 30 20 3 7 2 10 4 11 3 1 1 5 2 5 3 1 5 7
10.0 10.5 10.0 8.8 10.5 10.4 6.3 12.9 8.1 4.2 3.7 10.0 7.4 13.5 8.6 6.3 21.7 11.5

SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 31 17 2 12 2 9 10 5 5 2 3 4 4 3 6 1 0 8
10.3 8.9 6.7 15.0 10.5 9.4 15.9 5.9 13.5 8.3 11.1 8.0 14.8 8.1 17.1 6.3 13.1

MAKES NO DIFFERENCE 76 48 8 20 3 22 16 22 13 9 8 10 6 14 4 5 4 16
25.3 25.3 26.7 25.0 15.8 22.9 25.4 25.9 35.1 37.5 29.6 20.0 22.2 37.8 11.4 31.3 17.4 26.2

LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 126 79 14 33 11 40 26 35 14 8 12 22 12 13 19 6 12 22
[NET] 42.0 41.6 46.7 41.3 57.9 41.7 41.3 41.2 37.8 33.3 44.4 44.0 44.4 35.1 54.3 37.5 52.2 36.1
-----------------------

MUCH LESS LIKELY 83 56 10 17 7 23 16 25 12 3 7 17 8 10 14 3 9 12
27.7 29.5 33.3 21.3 36.8 24.0 25.4 29.4 32.4 12.5 25.9 34.0 29.6 27.0 40.0 18.8 39.1 19.7

SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 43 23 4 16 4 17 10 10 2 5 5 5 4 3 5 3 3 10
14.3 12.1 13.3 20.0 21.1 17.7 15.9 11.8 5.4 20.8 18.5 10.0 14.8 8.1 14.3 18.8 13.0 16.4

UNSURE 24 18 1 5 0 11 5 7 1 4 3 4 2 1 2 3 1 4
8.0 9.5 3.3 6.3 11.5 7.9 8.2 2.7 16.7 11.1 8.0 7.4 2.7 5.7 18.8 4.3 6.6

REFUSED 13 8 2 3 1 4 2 5 1 0 0 5 1 1 1 0 1 4
4.3 4.2 6.7 3.8 5.3 4.2 3.2 5.9 2.7 10.0 3.7 2.7 2.9 4.3 6.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q30. Councilman Larry Agran has received well over half a million dollars in city paychecks and benefits from Irvine taxpayers over the last five decades he has served on the
City Council, starting in 1978. Does knowing this make you more likely or less likely to vote for Larry Agran for Irvine City Council? And would you say that you are much
[more likely/less likely] or somewhat [more likely/less likely]?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MORE LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 61 8 13 30 10 7 7 9 44 33 9 4 39 2 5 9 2 0 61 0 36 25
[NET] 20.3 7.5 36.1 35.7 13.5 13.5 9.9 12.7 50.0 34.4 8.4 23.5 19.6 40.0 13.9 26.5 22.2 20.4 20.7 19.8
-----------------------

MUCH MORE LIKELY 30 4 5 17 4 3 1 2 23 19 5 1 21 1 3 3 1 0 30 0 14 16
10.0 3.8 13.9 20.2 5.4 5.8 1.4 2.8 26.1 19.8 4.7 5.9 10.6 20.0 8.3 8.8 11.1 10.0 8.0 12.7

SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 31 4 8 13 6 4 6 7 21 14 4 3 18 1 2 6 1 0 31 0 22 9
10.3 3.8 22.2 15.5 8.1 7.7 8.5 9.9 23.9 14.6 3.7 17.6 9.0 20.0 5.6 17.6 11.1 10.4 12.6 7.1

MAKES NO DIFFERENCE 76 29 5 25 17 13 12 14 24 27 31 5 54 0 6 10 1 1 75 0 42 34
25.3 27.4 13.9 29.8 23.0 25.0 16.9 19.7 27.3 28.1 29.0 29.4 27.1 16.7 29.4 11.1 100.0 25.1 24.1 27.0

LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR 126 58 16 22 30 26 47 43 11 31 45 6 85 2 20 10 3 0 126 0 75 51
[NET] 42.0 54.7 44.4 26.2 40.5 50.0 66.2 60.6 12.5 32.3 42.1 35.3 42.7 40.0 55.6 29.4 33.3 42.1 43.1 40.5
-----------------------

MUCH LESS LIKELY 83 40 11 14 18 17 38 35 5 16 26 5 64 1 8 3 2 0 83 0 41 42
27.7 37.7 30.6 16.7 24.3 32.7 53.5 49.3 5.7 16.7 24.3 29.4 32.2 20.0 22.2 8.8 22.2 27.8 23.6 33.3

SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 43 18 5 8 12 9 9 8 6 15 19 1 21 1 12 7 1 0 43 0 34 9
14.3 17.0 13.9 9.5 16.2 17.3 12.7 11.3 6.8 15.6 17.8 5.9 10.6 20.0 33.3 20.6 11.1 14.4 19.5 7.1

UNSURE 24 9 1 2 12 4 5 4 7 4 12 1 15 0 4 4 0 0 24 0 14 10
8.0 8.5 2.8 2.4 16.2 7.7 7.0 5.6 8.0 4.2 11.2 5.9 7.5 11.1 11.8 8.0 8.0 7.9

REFUSED 13 2 1 5 5 2 0 1 2 1 10 1 6 1 1 1 3 0 13 0 7 6
4.3 1.9 2.8 6.0 6.8 3.8 1.4 2.3 1.0 9.3 5.9 3.0 20.0 2.8 2.9 33.3 4.3 4.0 4.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q31. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure V in the City of Irvine in November. Measure V reads: "Shall the ordinance requiring an annual audit of Great Park
funds, prohibiting Great Park expenditures or contracts until a recommendation from the Great Park Board of Directors and approval by the City Council, establishing
whistleblower protections for those who report waste, fraud or abuse of Great Park funds, and requiring that the Irvine City Council be members of the Great Park Board of
Directors as a condition to receive City funding, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure V, or no, against Measure V? And would
you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 207 108 99 90 60 49 77 46 84 157 49 1 41 73 46 47 67 41 47 52
-------------- 69.0 74.5 63.9 73.8 62.5 69.0 74.0 59.0 71.2 69.8 66.2 100.0 80.4 69.5 68.7 61.0 78.8 68.3 66.2 61.9

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 100 55 45 46 24 27 38 19 43 74 25 1 18 30 23 29 32 23 16 29
33.3 37.9 29.0 37.7 25.0 38.0 36.5 24.4 36.4 32.9 33.8 100.0 35.3 28.6 34.3 37.7 37.6 38.3 22.5 34.5

PROBABLY VOTE YES 95 47 48 36 35 19 31 27 37 75 20 0 21 37 22 15 30 17 28 20
31.7 32.4 31.0 29.5 36.5 26.8 29.8 34.6 31.4 33.3 27.0 41.2 35.2 32.8 19.5 35.3 28.3 39.4 23.8

LEAN VOTE YES 12 6 6 8 1 3 8 0 4 8 4 0 2 6 1 3 5 1 3 3
4.0 4.1 3.9 6.6 1.0 4.2 7.7 3.4 3.6 5.4 3.9 5.7 1.5 3.9 5.9 1.7 4.2 3.6

VOTE NO [NET] 53 26 27 18 22 12 15 21 17 42 11 0 7 19 13 14 15 11 11 16
------------- 17.7 17.9 17.4 14.8 22.9 16.9 14.4 26.9 14.4 18.7 14.9 13.7 18.1 19.4 18.2 17.6 18.3 15.5 19.0

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 30 17 13 7 15 7 5 15 10 24 6 0 5 10 6 9 10 7 5 8
10.0 11.7 8.4 5.7 15.6 9.9 4.8 19.2 8.5 10.7 8.1 9.8 9.5 9.0 11.7 11.8 11.7 7.0 9.5

PROBABLY VOTE NO 17 5 12 9 5 3 8 5 4 15 2 0 2 5 5 5 2 3 5 7
5.7 3.4 7.7 7.4 5.2 4.2 7.7 6.4 3.4 6.7 2.7 3.9 4.8 7.5 6.5 2.4 5.0 7.0 8.3

LEAN VOTE NO 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 0 0 4 2 0 3 1 1 1
2.0 2.8 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.8 1.9 1.3 2.5 1.3 4.1 3.8 3.0 3.5 1.7 1.4 1.2

FIRM UNSURE 37 9 28 11 14 10 9 11 17 24 13 0 3 13 8 13 3 6 13 15
12.3 6.2 18.1 9.0 14.6 14.1 8.7 14.1 14.4 10.7 17.6 5.9 12.4 11.9 16.9 3.5 10.0 18.3 17.9

REFUSED 3 2 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1
1.0 1.4 0.6 2.5 2.9 0.9 1.4 3.9 3.3 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q31. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure V in the City of Irvine in November. Measure V reads: "Shall the ordinance requiring an annual audit of Great Park
funds, prohibiting Great Park expenditures or contracts until a recommendation from the Great Park Board of Directors and approval by the City Council, establishing
whistleblower protections for those who report waste, fraud or abuse of Great Park funds, and requiring that the Irvine City Council be members of the Great Park Board of
Directors as a condition to receive City funding, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure V, or no, against Measure V? And would
you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 207 45 45 35 14 23 37 40 50 34 15 33 27 54 28 29 51 35 3 7 0
-------------- 69.0 77.6 70.3 76.1 56.0 65.7 60.7 83.3 67.6 72.3 62.5 64.7 60.0 62.8 70.0 67.4 68.9 79.5 100.0 70.0

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 100 23 23 20 7 10 14 16 30 17 10 12 12 23 15 15 28 15 0 4 0
33.3 39.7 35.9 43.5 28.0 28.6 23.0 33.3 40.5 36.2 41.7 23.5 26.7 26.7 37.5 34.9 37.8 34.1 40.0

PROBABLY VOTE YES 95 18 18 13 6 13 22 17 19 16 3 21 14 27 12 13 22 16 2 3 0
31.7 31.0 28.1 28.3 24.0 37.1 36.1 35.4 25.7 34.0 12.5 41.2 31.1 31.4 30.0 30.2 29.7 36.4 66.7 30.0

LEAN VOTE YES 12 4 4 2 1 0 1 7 1 1 2 0 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 0 0
4.0 6.9 6.3 4.3 4.0 1.6 14.6 1.4 2.1 8.3 2.2 4.7 2.5 2.3 1.4 9.1 33.3

VOTE NO [NET] 53 8 10 7 5 10 12 5 13 8 4 12 10 19 6 7 11 7 0 3 0
------------- 17.7 13.8 15.6 15.2 20.0 28.6 19.7 10.4 17.6 17.0 16.7 23.5 22.2 22.1 15.0 16.3 14.9 15.9 30.0

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 30 4 3 4 3 8 7 1 6 5 2 8 7 11 3 4 5 5 0 2 0
10.0 6.9 4.7 8.7 12.0 22.9 11.5 2.1 8.1 10.6 8.3 15.7 15.6 12.8 7.5 9.3 6.8 11.4 20.0

PROBABLY VOTE NO 17 3 6 1 2 1 4 3 6 1 2 3 2 6 2 2 5 1 0 1 0
5.7 5.2 9.4 2.2 8.0 2.9 6.6 6.3 8.1 2.1 8.3 5.9 4.4 7.0 5.0 4.7 6.8 2.3 10.0

LEAN VOTE NO 6 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
2.0 1.7 1.6 4.3 2.9 1.6 2.1 1.4 4.3 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.4 2.3

FIRM UNSURE 37 3 8 4 6 2 12 3 8 5 5 6 8 10 6 7 12 2 0 0 0
12.3 5.2 12.5 8.7 24.0 5.7 19.7 6.3 10.8 10.6 20.8 11.8 17.8 11.6 15.0 16.3 16.2 4.5

REFUSED 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.0 3.4 1.6 4.1 3.5

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q31. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure V in the City of Irvine in November. Measure V reads: "Shall the ordinance requiring an annual audit of Great Park
funds, prohibiting Great Park expenditures or contracts until a recommendation from the Great Park Board of Directors and approval by the City Council, establishing
whistleblower protections for those who report waste, fraud or abuse of Great Park funds, and requiring that the Irvine City Council be members of the Great Park Board of
Directors as a condition to receive City funding, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure V, or no, against Measure V? And would
you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 207 129 19 59 19 70 39 54 25 16 17 34 18 26 24 11 15 46
-------------- 69.0 67.9 63.3 73.8 100.0 72.9 61.9 63.5 67.6 66.7 63.0 68.0 66.7 70.3 68.6 68.8 65.2 75.4

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 100 60 10 30 7 27 24 25 17 8 9 18 8 10 15 6 7 19
33.3 31.6 33.3 37.5 36.8 28.1 38.1 29.4 45.9 33.3 33.3 36.0 29.6 27.0 42.9 37.5 30.4 31.1

PROBABLY VOTE YES 95 60 9 26 8 39 14 26 8 8 7 13 10 13 9 5 6 24
31.7 31.6 30.0 32.5 42.1 40.6 22.2 30.6 21.6 33.3 25.9 26.0 37.0 35.1 25.7 31.3 26.1 39.3

LEAN VOTE YES 12 9 0 3 4 4 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 2 3
4.0 4.7 3.8 21.1 4.2 1.6 3.5 3.7 6.0 8.1 8.7 4.9

VOTE NO [NET] 53 38 5 10 0 15 12 17 9 6 3 8 5 7 7 3 4 10
------------- 17.7 20.0 16.7 12.5 15.6 19.0 20.0 24.3 25.0 11.1 16.0 18.5 18.9 20.0 18.8 17.4 16.4

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 30 23 2 5 0 11 6 8 5 2 3 4 2 5 4 3 3 4
10.0 12.1 6.7 6.3 11.5 9.5 9.4 13.5 8.3 11.1 8.0 7.4 13.5 11.4 18.8 13.0 6.6

PROBABLY VOTE NO 17 9 3 5 0 3 3 7 4 2 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 4
5.7 4.7 10.0 6.3 3.1 4.8 8.2 10.8 8.3 8.0 11.1 5.4 2.9 4.3 6.6

LEAN VOTE NO 6 6 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
2.0 3.2 1.0 4.8 2.4 8.3 5.7 3.3

FIRM UNSURE 37 20 6 11 0 11 12 13 1 2 6 8 4 3 3 2 4 5
12.3 10.5 20.0 13.8 11.5 19.0 15.3 2.7 8.3 22.2 16.0 14.8 8.1 8.6 12.5 17.4 8.2

REFUSED 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1.0 1.6 1.2 5.4 3.7 2.7 2.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q31. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure V in the City of Irvine in November. Measure V reads: "Shall the ordinance requiring an annual audit of Great Park
funds, prohibiting Great Park expenditures or contracts until a recommendation from the Great Park Board of Directors and approval by the City Council, establishing
whistleblower protections for those who report waste, fraud or abuse of Great Park funds, and requiring that the Irvine City Council be members of the Great Park Board of
Directors as a condition to receive City funding, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure V, or no, against Measure V? And would
you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 207 92 26 52 37 42 61 67 51 61 64 10 133 2 31 25 6 0 207 0 126 81
-------------- 69.0 86.8 72.2 61.9 50.0 80.8 85.9 94.4 58.0 63.5 59.8 58.8 66.8 40.0 86.1 73.5 66.7 69.2 72.4 64.3

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 100 50 13 24 13 25 34 40 23 24 26 7 62 2 13 13 3 0 100 0 58 42
33.3 47.2 36.1 28.6 17.6 48.1 47.9 56.3 26.1 25.0 24.3 41.2 31.2 40.0 36.1 38.2 33.3 33.4 33.3 33.3

PROBABLY VOTE YES 95 35 10 27 23 15 26 23 26 34 32 3 63 0 16 11 2 0 95 0 60 35
31.7 33.0 27.8 32.1 31.1 28.8 36.6 32.4 29.5 35.4 29.9 17.6 31.7 44.4 32.4 22.2 31.8 34.5 27.8

LEAN VOTE YES 12 7 3 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 6 0 8 0 2 1 1 0 12 0 8 4
4.0 6.6 8.3 1.2 1.4 3.8 1.4 5.6 2.3 3.1 5.6 4.0 5.6 2.9 11.1 4.0 4.6 3.2

VOTE NO [NET] 53 9 8 17 19 8 7 3 25 23 18 3 39 2 4 4 1 0 53 0 26 27
------------- 17.7 8.5 22.2 20.2 25.7 15.4 9.9 4.2 28.4 24.0 16.8 17.6 19.6 40.0 11.1 11.8 11.1 17.7 14.9 21.4

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 30 5 4 11 10 6 3 1 17 17 7 1 22 2 2 2 1 0 30 0 15 15
10.0 4.7 11.1 13.1 13.5 11.5 4.2 1.4 19.3 17.7 6.5 5.9 11.1 40.0 5.6 5.9 11.1 10.0 8.6 11.9

PROBABLY VOTE NO 17 3 3 4 7 1 3 2 6 5 8 2 13 0 1 1 0 0 17 0 7 10
5.7 2.8 8.3 4.8 9.5 1.9 4.2 2.8 6.8 5.2 7.5 11.8 6.5 2.8 2.9 5.7 4.0 7.9

LEAN VOTE NO 6 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 1 3 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 6 0 4 2
2.0 0.9 2.8 2.4 2.7 1.9 1.4 2.3 1.0 2.8 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.0 2.3 1.6

FIRM UNSURE 37 5 1 14 17 1 3 1 10 11 24 4 24 1 1 5 2 1 36 0 21 16
12.3 4.7 2.8 16.7 23.0 1.9 4.2 1.4 11.4 11.5 22.4 23.5 12.1 20.0 2.8 14.7 22.2 100.0 12.0 12.1 12.7

REFUSED 3 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2
1.0 2.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.3 1.0 0.9 1.5 1.0 0.6 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q32. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure W in the City of Irvine in November. Measure W reads: "Shall the ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Irvine
to establish that no person may serve more than a total of two 4-year terms as a member of City Council and two 2-year terms as an elected Mayor, whether served consecutively
or non-consecutively, effectively creating a lifetime term limit of 12-years, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure W, or no,
against Measure W? And would you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 177 85 92 80 46 45 72 33 72 126 50 1 28 63 43 43 50 35 41 51
-------------- 59.0 58.6 59.4 65.6 47.9 63.4 69.2 42.3 61.0 56.0 67.6 100.0 54.9 60.0 64.2 55.8 58.8 58.3 57.7 60.7

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 116 59 57 62 20 30 57 15 44 85 31 0 18 39 27 32 36 23 21 36
38.7 40.7 36.8 50.8 20.8 42.3 54.8 19.2 37.3 37.8 41.9 35.3 37.1 40.3 41.6 42.4 38.3 29.6 42.9

PROBABLY VOTE YES 57 24 33 17 26 13 14 18 25 38 18 1 9 24 14 10 13 11 20 13
19.0 16.6 21.3 13.9 27.1 18.3 13.5 23.1 21.2 16.9 24.3 100.0 17.6 22.9 20.9 13.0 15.3 18.3 28.2 15.5

LEAN VOTE YES 4 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 2
1.3 1.4 1.3 0.8 2.8 1.0 2.5 1.3 1.4 2.0 3.0 1.3 1.2 1.7 2.4

VOTE NO [NET] 102 54 48 37 42 18 27 38 37 86 16 0 21 36 18 27 32 22 25 23
------------- 34.0 37.2 31.0 30.3 43.8 25.4 26.0 48.7 31.4 38.2 21.6 41.2 34.3 26.9 35.1 37.6 36.7 35.2 27.4

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 54 32 22 20 22 9 14 20 20 46 8 0 9 17 13 15 18 14 8 14
18.0 22.1 14.2 16.4 22.9 12.7 13.5 25.6 16.9 20.4 10.8 17.6 16.2 19.4 19.5 21.2 23.3 11.3 16.7

PROBABLY VOTE NO 45 20 25 15 19 9 11 17 17 38 7 0 12 17 4 12 13 7 16 9
15.0 13.8 16.1 12.3 19.8 12.7 10.6 21.8 14.4 16.9 9.5 23.5 16.2 6.0 15.6 15.3 11.7 22.5 10.7

LEAN VOTE NO 3 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0
1.0 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.4

FIRM UNSURE 19 5 14 4 8 7 4 7 8 11 8 0 1 6 6 6 2 3 5 9
6.3 3.4 9.0 3.3 8.3 9.9 3.8 9.0 6.8 4.9 10.8 2.0 5.7 9.0 7.8 2.4 5.0 7.0 10.7

REFUSED 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.9 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q32. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure W in the City of Irvine in November. Measure W reads: "Shall the ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Irvine
to establish that no person may serve more than a total of two 4-year terms as a member of City Council and two 2-year terms as an elected Mayor, whether served consecutively
or non-consecutively, effectively creating a lifetime term limit of 12-years, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure W, or no,
against Measure W? And would you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 177 33 47 31 14 18 28 29 51 30 15 27 19 49 21 26 48 29 2 2 0
-------------- 59.0 56.9 73.4 67.4 56.0 51.4 45.9 60.4 68.9 63.8 62.5 52.9 42.2 57.0 52.5 60.5 64.9 65.9 66.7 20.0

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 116 24 38 22 8 11 9 22 40 21 9 11 9 39 14 19 24 18 2 0 0
38.7 41.4 59.4 47.8 32.0 31.4 14.8 45.8 54.1 44.7 37.5 21.6 20.0 45.3 35.0 44.2 32.4 40.9 66.7

PROBABLY VOTE YES 57 9 8 8 5 7 19 7 10 9 4 16 10 9 7 6 23 11 0 1 0
19.0 15.5 12.5 17.4 20.0 20.0 31.1 14.6 13.5 19.1 16.7 31.4 22.2 10.5 17.5 14.0 31.1 25.0 10.0

LEAN VOTE YES 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
1.3 1.6 2.2 4.0 1.4 8.3 1.2 2.3 1.4 10.0

VOTE NO [NET] 102 24 13 10 8 17 25 18 19 13 5 21 21 33 15 16 17 12 1 8 0
------------- 34.0 41.4 20.3 21.7 32.0 48.6 41.0 37.5 25.7 27.7 20.8 41.2 46.7 38.4 37.5 37.2 23.0 27.3 33.3 80.0

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 54 13 7 6 3 12 10 8 12 7 2 8 14 21 11 7 7 5 0 3 0
18.0 22.4 10.9 13.0 12.0 34.3 16.4 16.7 16.2 14.9 8.3 15.7 31.1 24.4 27.5 16.3 9.5 11.4 30.0

PROBABLY VOTE NO 45 9 6 4 5 5 14 9 6 6 3 12 7 12 3 8 10 7 0 5 0
15.0 15.5 9.4 8.7 20.0 14.3 23.0 18.8 8.1 12.8 12.5 23.5 15.6 14.0 7.5 18.6 13.5 15.9 50.0

LEAN VOTE NO 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
1.0 3.4 1.6 2.1 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.3 33.3

FIRM UNSURE 19 1 3 4 3 0 8 1 3 3 4 3 5 3 4 1 8 3 0 0 0
6.3 1.7 4.7 8.7 12.0 13.1 2.1 4.1 6.4 16.7 5.9 11.1 3.5 10.0 2.3 10.8 6.8

REFUSED 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.7 1.6 2.2 1.4 2.1 1.2 1.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q32. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure W in the City of Irvine in November. Measure W reads: "Shall the ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Irvine
to establish that no person may serve more than a total of two 4-year terms as a member of City Council and two 2-year terms as an elected Mayor, whether served consecutively
or non-consecutively, effectively creating a lifetime term limit of 12-years, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure W, or no,
against Measure W? And would you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 177 118 14 45 11 57 37 48 24 19 14 26 12 24 20 9 13 40
-------------- 59.0 62.1 46.7 56.3 57.9 59.4 58.7 56.5 64.9 79.2 51.9 52.0 44.4 64.9 57.1 56.3 56.5 65.6

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 116 80 11 25 8 40 20 31 17 8 7 19 10 17 17 7 10 21
38.7 42.1 36.7 31.3 42.1 41.7 31.7 36.5 45.9 33.3 25.9 38.0 37.0 45.9 48.6 43.8 43.5 34.4

PROBABLY VOTE YES 57 36 3 18 2 17 17 15 6 10 7 7 2 6 3 2 3 17
19.0 18.9 10.0 22.5 10.5 17.7 27.0 17.6 16.2 41.7 25.9 14.0 7.4 16.2 8.6 12.5 13.0 27.9

LEAN VOTE YES 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
1.3 1.1 2.5 5.3 2.4 2.7 4.2 2.7 3.3

VOTE NO [NET] 102 61 12 29 6 33 18 33 12 5 10 18 12 13 14 6 6 18
------------- 34.0 32.1 40.0 36.3 31.6 34.4 28.6 38.8 32.4 20.8 37.0 36.0 44.4 35.1 40.0 37.5 26.1 29.5

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 54 34 8 12 3 14 8 22 7 4 8 7 7 9 4 3 3 9
18.0 17.9 26.7 15.0 15.8 14.6 12.7 25.9 18.9 16.7 29.6 14.0 25.9 24.3 11.4 18.8 13.0 14.8

PROBABLY VOTE NO 45 24 4 17 2 18 9 11 5 1 1 11 5 3 9 3 3 9
15.0 12.6 13.3 21.3 10.5 18.8 14.3 12.9 13.5 4.2 3.7 22.0 18.5 8.1 25.7 18.8 13.0 14.8

LEAN VOTE NO 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1.0 1.6 5.3 1.0 1.6 3.7 2.7 2.9

FIRM UNSURE 19 10 4 5 1 6 8 3 1 0 3 4 3 0 1 1 4 3
6.3 5.3 13.3 6.3 5.3 6.3 12.7 3.5 2.7 11.1 8.0 11.1 2.9 6.3 17.4 4.9

REFUSED 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.7 0.5 1.3 5.3 1.2 4.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q32. Voters will have the opportunity to vote on Measure W in the City of Irvine in November. Measure W reads: "Shall the ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Irvine
to establish that no person may serve more than a total of two 4-year terms as a member of City Council and two 2-year terms as an elected Mayor, whether served consecutively
or non-consecutively, effectively creating a lifetime term limit of 12-years, be adopted?" If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of Measure W, or no,
against Measure W? And would you say that you would definitely vote (YES/NO) or probably vote (YES/NO)? Would you say that you lean one way or another?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

VOTE YES [NET] 177 74 22 42 39 33 51 53 34 43 67 6 116 3 24 22 6 0 177 0 103 74
-------------- 59.0 69.8 61.1 50.0 52.7 63.5 71.8 74.6 38.6 44.8 62.6 35.3 58.3 60.0 66.7 64.7 66.7 59.2 59.2 58.7

DEFINITELY VOTE YES 116 52 11 27 26 27 41 43 18 27 36 3 77 2 16 15 3 0 116 0 61 55
38.7 49.1 30.6 32.1 35.1 51.9 57.7 60.6 20.5 28.1 33.6 17.6 38.7 40.0 44.4 44.1 33.3 38.8 35.1 43.7

PROBABLY VOTE YES 57 21 10 15 11 6 9 9 16 16 28 3 35 1 8 7 3 0 57 0 40 17
19.0 19.8 27.8 17.9 14.9 11.5 12.7 12.7 18.2 16.7 26.2 17.6 17.6 20.0 22.2 20.6 33.3 19.1 23.0 13.5

LEAN VOTE YES 4 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2
1.3 0.9 2.8 2.7 1.4 1.4 2.8 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.6

VOTE NO [NET] 102 30 13 37 22 17 19 16 48 47 28 7 71 2 9 11 2 0 102 0 58 44
------------- 34.0 28.3 36.1 44.0 29.7 32.7 26.8 22.5 54.5 49.0 26.2 41.2 35.7 40.0 25.0 32.4 22.2 34.1 33.3 34.9

DEFINITELY VOTE NO 54 17 6 21 10 13 10 7 27 27 12 4 37 2 3 7 1 0 54 0 28 26
18.0 16.0 16.7 25.0 13.5 25.0 14.1 9.9 30.7 28.1 11.2 23.5 18.6 40.0 8.3 20.6 11.1 18.1 16.1 20.6

PROBABLY VOTE NO 45 12 6 16 11 4 8 8 20 19 15 3 33 0 6 2 1 0 45 0 28 17
15.0 11.3 16.7 19.0 14.9 7.7 11.3 11.3 22.7 19.8 14.0 17.6 16.6 16.7 5.9 11.1 15.1 16.1 13.5

LEAN VOTE NO 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 1
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.5 5.9 1.0 1.1 0.8

FIRM UNSURE 19 2 1 5 11 2 1 2 6 6 10 4 11 0 2 1 1 1 18 0 12 7
6.3 1.9 2.8 6.0 14.9 3.8 1.4 2.8 6.8 6.3 9.3 23.5 5.5 5.6 2.9 11.1 100.0 6.0 6.9 5.6

REFUSED 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
0.7 2.7 1.9 0.5 2.8 0.7 0.6 0.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q33. Now imagine that you are a judge in a political debate between Irvine Mayor Steven Choi and Irvine City Councilmember Larry Agran. Please listen to the two positions and
tell me to whom you would award the debate point.

LARRY AGRAN says: "Our schools are already feeling the impacts of over development in Irvine. If development keeps its current pace, all of our schools will be overcrowded
soon."

STEVE CHOI says: "Irvine is a master planned community with all of the infrastructure, including schools, well thought out and planned for. The new development coming to
Irvine fits into our plan and will not over cause overcrowding in our schools. In fact, it is the developers who are providing the land and building our new schools for the
students."

With whom do you agree more, LARRY AGRAN or STEVEN CHOI?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LARRY AGRAN WHO SAYS 143 59 84 38 67 32 29 54 60 111 31 1 26 48 36 33 32 27 42 42
DEVELOPMENT WILL CAUSE 47.7 40.7 54.2 31.1 69.8 45.1 27.9 69.2 50.8 49.3 41.9 100.0 51.0 45.7 53.7 42.9 37.6 45.0 59.2 50.0
OVER CROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

STEVEN CHOI WHO SAYS NEW 126 73 53 69 25 28 61 21 44 95 31 0 23 45 24 34 47 26 21 32
DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED 42.0 50.3 34.2 56.6 26.0 39.4 58.7 26.9 37.3 42.2 41.9 45.1 42.9 35.8 44.2 55.3 43.3 29.6 38.1
AND WILL NOT CAUSE
OVERCROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

UNSURE 18 6 12 8 3 6 8 2 8 10 8 0 1 9 4 4 4 2 6 6
6.0 4.1 7.7 6.6 3.1 8.5 7.7 2.6 6.8 4.4 10.8 2.0 8.6 6.0 5.2 4.7 3.3 8.5 7.1

REFUSED 13 7 6 7 1 5 6 1 6 9 4 0 1 3 3 6 2 5 2 4
4.3 4.8 3.9 5.7 1.0 7.0 5.8 1.3 5.1 4.0 5.4 2.0 2.9 4.5 7.8 2.4 8.3 2.8 4.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q33. Now imagine that you are a judge in a political debate between Irvine Mayor Steven Choi and Irvine City Councilmember Larry Agran. Please listen to the two positions and
tell me to whom you would award the debate point.

LARRY AGRAN says: "Our schools are already feeling the impacts of over development in Irvine. If development keeps its current pace, all of our schools will be overcrowded
soon."

STEVE CHOI says: "Irvine is a master planned community with all of the infrastructure, including schools, well thought out and planned for. The new development coming to
Irvine fits into our plan and will not over cause overcrowding in our schools. In fact, it is the developers who are providing the land and building our new schools for the
students."

With whom do you agree more, LARRY AGRAN or STEVEN CHOI?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LARRY AGRAN WHO SAYS 143 16 22 18 14 22 45 13 25 21 11 35 32 40 17 20 35 22 3 6 0
DEVELOPMENT WILL CAUSE 47.7 27.6 34.4 39.1 56.0 62.9 73.8 27.1 33.8 44.7 45.8 68.6 71.1 46.5 42.5 46.5 47.3 50.0 100.0 60.0
OVER CROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

STEVEN CHOI WHO SAYS NEW 126 37 32 21 7 12 13 29 40 21 7 14 11 36 19 18 28 21 0 4 0
DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED 42.0 63.8 50.0 45.7 28.0 34.3 21.3 60.4 54.1 44.7 29.2 27.5 24.4 41.9 47.5 41.9 37.8 47.7 40.0
AND WILL NOT CAUSE
OVERCROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

UNSURE 18 2 6 3 3 1 2 5 3 3 3 1 2 5 2 3 7 1 0 0 0
6.0 3.4 9.4 6.5 12.0 2.9 3.3 10.4 4.1 6.4 12.5 2.0 4.4 5.8 5.0 7.0 9.5 2.3

REFUSED 13 3 4 4 1 0 1 1 6 2 3 1 0 5 2 2 4 0 0 0 0
4.3 5.2 6.3 8.7 4.0 1.6 2.1 8.1 4.3 12.5 2.0 5.8 5.0 4.7 5.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q33. Now imagine that you are a judge in a political debate between Irvine Mayor Steven Choi and Irvine City Councilmember Larry Agran. Please listen to the two positions and
tell me to whom you would award the debate point.

LARRY AGRAN says: "Our schools are already feeling the impacts of over development in Irvine. If development keeps its current pace, all of our schools will be overcrowded
soon."

STEVE CHOI says: "Irvine is a master planned community with all of the infrastructure, including schools, well thought out and planned for. The new development coming to
Irvine fits into our plan and will not over cause overcrowding in our schools. In fact, it is the developers who are providing the land and building our new schools for the
students."

With whom do you agree more, LARRY AGRAN or STEVEN CHOI?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LARRY AGRAN WHO SAYS 143 87 12 44 8 44 34 39 18 11 16 22 11 15 19 7 12 30
DEVELOPMENT WILL CAUSE 47.7 45.8 40.0 55.0 42.1 45.8 54.0 45.9 48.6 45.8 59.3 44.0 40.7 40.5 54.3 43.8 52.2 49.2
OVER CROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

STEVEN CHOI WHO SAYS NEW 126 82 12 32 9 43 21 38 15 11 9 23 10 16 12 8 9 28
DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED 42.0 43.2 40.0 40.0 47.4 44.8 33.3 44.7 40.5 45.8 33.3 46.0 37.0 43.2 34.3 50.0 39.1 45.9
AND WILL NOT CAUSE
OVERCROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

UNSURE 18 14 2 2 1 6 6 4 1 2 2 3 2 4 2 1 1 1
6.0 7.4 6.7 2.5 5.3 6.3 9.5 4.7 2.7 8.3 7.4 6.0 7.4 10.8 5.7 6.3 4.3 1.6

REFUSED 13 7 4 2 1 3 2 4 3 0 0 2 4 2 2 0 1 2
4.3 3.7 13.3 2.5 5.3 3.1 3.2 4.7 8.1 4.0 14.8 5.4 5.7 4.3 3.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q33. Now imagine that you are a judge in a political debate between Irvine Mayor Steven Choi and Irvine City Councilmember Larry Agran. Please listen to the two positions and
tell me to whom you would award the debate point.

LARRY AGRAN says: "Our schools are already feeling the impacts of over development in Irvine. If development keeps its current pace, all of our schools will be overcrowded
soon."

STEVE CHOI says: "Irvine is a master planned community with all of the infrastructure, including schools, well thought out and planned for. The new development coming to
Irvine fits into our plan and will not over cause overcrowding in our schools. In fact, it is the developers who are providing the land and building our new schools for the
students."

With whom do you agree more, LARRY AGRAN or STEVEN CHOI?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LARRY AGRAN WHO SAYS 143 15 25 71 32 24 21 13 68 71 42 6 99 3 17 16 2 1 142 0 87 56
DEVELOPMENT WILL CAUSE 47.7 14.2 69.4 84.5 43.2 46.2 29.6 18.3 77.3 74.0 39.3 35.3 49.7 60.0 47.2 47.1 22.2 100.0 47.5 50.0 44.4
OVER CROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

STEVEN CHOI WHO SAYS NEW 126 84 8 10 24 23 47 54 18 20 44 8 89 1 14 12 2 0 126 0 70 56
DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED 42.0 79.2 22.2 11.9 32.4 44.2 66.2 76.1 20.5 20.8 41.1 47.1 44.7 20.0 38.9 35.3 22.2 42.1 40.2 44.4
AND WILL NOT CAUSE
OVERCROWDING IN OUR
SCHOOLS

UNSURE 18 4 2 1 11 3 1 2 1 1 14 2 6 0 3 5 2 0 18 0 14 4
6.0 3.8 5.6 1.2 14.9 5.8 1.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 13.1 11.8 3.0 8.3 14.7 22.2 6.0 8.0 3.2

REFUSED 13 3 1 2 7 2 2 2 1 4 7 1 5 1 2 1 3 0 13 0 3 10
4.3 2.8 2.8 2.4 9.5 3.8 2.8 2.8 1.1 4.2 6.5 5.9 2.5 20.0 5.6 2.9 33.3 4.3 1.7 7.9

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q34. And finally, for demographic purposes only, which of the following best describes your ethnic background?

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LATINO/HISPANIC 17 8 9 4 6 7 3 5 9 12 5 0 5 6 3 3 5 3 6 3
5.7 5.5 5.8 3.3 6.3 9.9 2.9 6.4 7.6 5.3 6.8 9.8 5.7 4.5 3.9 5.9 5.0 8.5 3.6

WHITE/CAUCASIAN 199 92 107 94 62 34 79 49 71 175 23 1 25 58 48 68 48 44 35 72
66.3 63.4 69.0 77.0 64.6 47.9 76.0 62.8 60.2 77.8 31.1 100.0 49.0 55.2 71.6 88.3 56.5 73.3 49.3 85.7

BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 5 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 0
1.7 2.1 1.3 1.6 2.1 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 3.3 2.8

ASIAN 36 22 14 9 10 17 9 9 18 12 24 0 12 18 6 0 19 3 11 3
12.0 15.2 9.0 7.4 10.4 23.9 8.7 11.5 15.3 5.3 32.4 23.5 17.1 9.0 22.4 5.0 15.5 3.6

OTHER 34 18 16 9 14 9 8 11 15 18 16 0 8 17 6 3 12 6 13 3
11.3 12.4 10.3 7.4 14.6 12.7 7.7 14.1 12.7 8.0 21.6 15.7 16.2 9.0 3.9 14.1 10.0 18.3 3.6

REFUSED 9 2 7 4 2 3 4 2 3 3 6 0 0 4 3 2 0 2 4 3
3.0 1.4 4.5 3.3 2.1 4.2 3.8 2.6 2.5 1.3 8.1 3.8 4.5 2.6 3.3 5.6 3.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q34. And finally, for demographic purposes only, which of the following best describes your ethnic background?

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LATINO/HISPANIC 17 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 1 4 3 4 2 5 2 1 3 5 0 1 0
5.7 3.4 3.1 6.5 16.0 8.6 4.9 6.3 1.4 8.5 12.5 7.8 4.4 5.8 5.0 2.3 4.1 11.4 10.0

WHITE/CAUCASIAN 199 43 51 21 13 22 40 32 62 18 16 25 37 72 25 30 42 21 3 6 0
66.3 74.1 79.7 45.7 52.0 62.9 65.6 66.7 83.8 38.3 66.7 49.0 82.2 83.7 62.5 69.8 56.8 47.7 100.0 60.0

BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN 5 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
1.7 3.4 4.0 2.9 1.6 2.7 2.1 3.9 1.2 2.5 4.1

ASIAN 36 5 4 14 3 3 7 6 3 16 1 8 2 1 6 4 12 11 0 2 0
12.0 8.6 6.3 30.4 12.0 8.6 11.5 12.5 4.1 34.0 4.2 15.7 4.4 1.2 15.0 9.3 16.2 25.0 20.0

OTHER 34 6 3 6 3 6 8 6 3 7 2 10 4 4 6 6 12 6 0 0 0
11.3 10.3 4.7 13.0 12.0 17.1 13.1 12.5 4.1 14.9 8.3 19.6 8.9 4.7 15.0 14.0 16.2 13.6

REFUSED 9 0 4 2 1 0 2 1 3 1 2 2 0 3 0 2 2 1 0 1 0
3.0 6.3 4.3 4.0 3.3 2.1 4.1 2.1 8.3 3.9 3.5 4.7 2.7 2.3 10.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q34. And finally, for demographic purposes only, which of the following best describes your ethnic background?

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LATINO/HISPANIC 17 7 5 5 1 7 5 3 1 0 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 4
5.7 3.7 16.7 6.3 5.3 7.3 7.9 3.5 2.7 7.4 2.0 11.1 2.7 2.9 18.8 8.7 6.6

WHITE/CAUCASIAN 199 136 18 45 13 55 31 69 31 15 16 38 18 23 22 6 17 44
66.3 71.6 60.0 56.3 68.4 57.3 49.2 81.2 83.8 62.5 59.3 76.0 66.7 62.2 62.9 37.5 73.9 72.1

BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN 5 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
1.7 1.1 3.3 2.5 1.0 3.2 2.4 4.2 3.7 2.7 6.3 1.6

ASIAN 36 23 1 12 4 16 12 3 1 3 4 6 3 3 5 3 2 7
12.0 12.1 3.3 15.0 21.1 16.7 19.0 3.5 2.7 12.5 14.8 12.0 11.1 8.1 14.3 18.8 8.7 11.5

OTHER 34 17 2 15 0 15 11 5 3 5 4 3 1 8 5 3 1 4
11.3 8.9 6.7 18.8 15.6 17.5 5.9 8.1 20.8 14.8 6.0 3.7 21.6 14.3 18.8 4.3 6.6

REFUSED 9 5 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1
3.0 2.6 10.0 1.3 5.3 2.1 3.2 3.5 2.7 3.7 4.0 3.7 2.7 5.7 4.3 1.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

Q34. And finally, for demographic purposes only, which of the following best describes your ethnic background?

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

LATINO/HISPANIC 17 6 3 3 5 2 4 4 5 5 7 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 11 6
5.7 5.7 8.3 3.6 6.8 3.8 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.2 6.5 100.0 100.0 5.4 6.3 4.8

WHITE/CAUCASIAN 199 72 25 62 40 38 49 50 64 66 63 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 199 0 102 97
66.3 67.9 69.4 73.8 54.1 73.1 69.0 70.4 72.7 68.8 58.9 100.0 66.6 58.6 77.0

BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN 5 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 2
1.7 2.8 2.4 2.7 1.4 3.4 2.1 1.9 100.0 1.7 1.7 1.6

ASIAN 36 14 1 10 11 7 10 8 8 13 12 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 36 0 30 6
12.0 13.2 2.8 11.9 14.9 13.5 14.1 11.3 9.1 13.5 11.2 100.0 12.0 17.2 4.8

OTHER 34 12 6 6 10 5 6 8 7 10 16 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 34 0 24 10
11.3 11.3 16.7 7.1 13.5 9.6 8.5 11.3 8.0 10.4 15.0 100.0 11.4 13.8 7.9

REFUSED 9 2 0 1 6 0 1 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 4 5
3.0 1.9 1.2 8.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 6.5 100.0 3.0 2.3 4.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

QLANG

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SPANISH 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0.3 0.6 1.4 0.8 1.4 1.3 1.2

ENGLISH 299 145 154 122 96 70 104 78 117 225 73 1 51 105 67 76 85 60 71 83
99.7 100.0 99.4 100.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 99.2 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.8

CHINESE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

QLANG

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SPANISH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0.3 4.0 4.2 1.4

ENGLISH 299 58 64 46 24 35 61 48 74 47 23 51 45 86 40 43 73 44 3 10 0
99.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 96.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 95.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0

CHINESE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

QLANG

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SPANISH 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 1.3 1.6 3.7

ENGLISH 299 190 30 79 19 96 62 85 37 24 26 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
99.7 100.0 100.0 98.8 100.0 100.0 98.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 96.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CHINESE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

QLANG

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

SPANISH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
0.3 1.4 0.9 5.9 100.0 0.8

ENGLISH 299 106 36 84 73 52 71 71 88 96 106 16 199 5 36 34 9 0 299 0 174 125
99.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.6 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 94.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.2

CHINESE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GENDER

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MALE 145 145 0 58 35 46 45 32 68 108 36 1 33 52 37 23 85 60 0 0
48.3 100.0 47.5 36.5 64.8 43.3 41.0 57.6 48.0 48.6 100.0 64.7 49.5 55.2 29.9 100.0 100.0

FEMALE 155 0 155 64 61 25 59 46 50 117 38 0 18 53 30 54 0 0 71 84
51.7 100.0 52.5 63.5 35.2 56.7 59.0 42.4 52.0 51.4 35.3 50.5 44.8 70.1 100.0 100.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GENDER

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MALE 145 58 0 46 0 35 0 29 29 33 13 17 18 32 21 26 38 22 2 4 0
48.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 60.4 39.2 70.2 54.2 33.3 40.0 37.2 52.5 60.5 51.4 50.0 66.7 40.0

FEMALE 155 0 64 0 25 0 61 19 45 14 11 34 27 54 19 17 36 22 1 6 0
51.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 39.6 60.8 29.8 45.8 66.7 60.0 62.8 47.5 39.5 48.6 50.0 33.3 60.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GENDER

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MALE 145 86 16 43 14 49 29 38 15 12 13 20 14 19 19 9 11 28
48.3 45.3 53.3 53.8 73.7 51.0 46.0 44.7 40.5 50.0 48.1 40.0 51.9 51.4 54.3 56.3 47.8 45.9

FEMALE 155 104 14 37 5 47 34 47 22 12 14 30 13 18 16 7 12 33
51.7 54.7 46.7 46.3 26.3 49.0 54.0 55.3 59.5 50.0 51.9 60.0 48.1 48.6 45.7 43.8 52.2 54.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GENDER

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

MALE 145 64 17 31 33 28 34 38 42 43 50 8 92 3 22 18 2 0 145 0 93 52
48.3 60.4 47.2 36.9 44.6 53.8 47.9 53.5 47.7 44.8 46.7 47.1 46.2 60.0 61.1 52.9 22.2 48.5 53.4 41.3

FEMALE 155 42 19 53 41 24 37 33 46 53 57 9 107 2 14 16 7 1 154 0 81 74
51.7 39.6 52.8 63.1 55.4 46.2 52.1 46.5 52.3 55.2 53.3 52.9 53.8 40.0 38.9 47.1 77.8 100.0 51.5 46.6 58.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PARTY

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

REPUBLICAN 122 58 64 122 0 0 104 0 18 101 21 0 5 43 29 45 29 29 19 45
40.7 40.0 41.3 100.0 100.0 15.3 44.9 28.4 9.8 41.0 43.3 58.4 34.1 48.3 26.8 53.6

DEMOCRATIC 96 35 61 0 96 0 0 78 18 74 21 1 18 33 18 27 17 18 34 27
32.0 24.1 39.4 100.0 100.0 15.3 32.9 28.4 100.0 35.3 31.4 26.9 35.1 20.0 30.0 47.9 32.1

DTS 71 46 25 0 0 71 0 0 71 42 29 0 23 24 19 5 33 13 14 11
23.7 31.7 16.1 100.0 60.2 18.7 39.2 45.1 22.9 28.4 6.5 38.8 21.7 19.7 13.1

OTHER 11 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 3 0 5 5 1 0 6 0 4 1
3.7 4.1 3.2 9.3 3.6 4.1 9.8 4.8 1.5 7.1 5.6 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PARTY

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

REPUBLICAN 122 58 64 0 0 0 0 48 74 0 0 0 0 49 20 17 20 13 1 2 0
40.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 57.0 50.0 39.5 27.0 29.5 33.3 20.0

DEMOCRATIC 96 0 0 0 0 35 61 0 0 0 0 51 45 30 10 13 24 14 0 5 0
32.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 34.9 25.0 30.2 32.4 31.8 50.0

DTS 71 0 0 46 25 0 0 0 0 47 24 0 0 6 8 12 29 14 1 1 0
23.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7.0 20.0 27.9 39.2 31.8 33.3 10.0

OTHER 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 0
3.7 1.2 5.0 2.3 1.4 6.8 33.3 20.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PARTY

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

REPUBLICAN 122 82 14 26 7 33 17 39 26 7 8 27 14 18 11 0 9 28
40.7 43.2 46.7 32.5 36.8 34.4 27.0 45.9 70.3 29.2 29.6 54.0 51.9 48.6 31.4 39.1 45.9

DEMOCRATIC 96 58 9 29 2 30 24 30 10 7 8 12 9 10 14 8 9 19
32.0 30.5 30.0 36.3 10.5 31.3 38.1 35.3 27.0 29.2 29.6 24.0 33.3 27.0 40.0 50.0 39.1 31.1

DTS 71 42 7 22 7 27 21 15 1 7 9 10 4 8 9 8 4 12
23.7 22.1 23.3 27.5 36.8 28.1 33.3 17.6 2.7 29.2 33.3 20.0 14.8 21.6 25.7 50.0 17.4 19.7

OTHER 11 8 0 3 3 6 1 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
3.7 4.2 3.8 15.8 6.3 1.6 1.2 12.5 7.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 4.3 3.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PARTY

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

REPUBLICAN 122 61 13 23 25 23 38 48 27 26 40 4 94 2 9 9 4 0 122 0 55 67
40.7 57.5 36.1 27.4 33.8 44.2 53.5 67.6 30.7 27.1 37.4 23.5 47.2 40.0 25.0 26.5 44.4 40.8 31.6 53.2

DEMOCRATIC 96 18 12 42 24 13 14 10 43 49 30 6 62 2 10 14 2 0 96 0 59 37
32.0 17.0 33.3 50.0 32.4 25.0 19.7 14.1 48.9 51.0 28.0 35.3 31.2 40.0 27.8 41.2 22.2 32.1 33.9 29.4

DTS 71 25 11 17 18 15 17 12 16 18 31 7 34 1 17 9 3 1 70 0 49 22
23.7 23.6 30.6 20.2 24.3 28.8 23.9 16.9 18.2 18.8 29.0 41.2 17.1 20.0 47.2 26.5 33.3 100.0 23.4 28.2 17.5

OTHER 11 2 0 2 7 1 2 1 2 3 6 0 9 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 11 0
3.7 1.9 2.4 9.5 1.9 2.8 1.4 2.3 3.1 5.6 4.5 5.9 3.7 6.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

HOUSEHOLD PARTY

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PURE REP HOUSEHOLD 104 45 59 104 0 0 104 0 0 85 19 0 4 39 20 41 25 20 18 41
34.7 31.0 38.1 85.2 100.0 37.8 25.7 7.8 37.1 29.9 53.2 29.4 33.3 25.4 48.8

PURE DEM HOUSEHOLD 78 32 46 0 78 0 0 78 0 59 18 1 17 25 14 22 17 15 25 21
26.0 22.1 29.7 81.3 100.0 26.2 24.3 100.0 33.3 23.8 20.9 28.6 20.0 25.0 35.2 25.0

MIXED PARTY HOUSEHOLD 118 68 50 18 18 71 0 0 118 81 37 0 30 41 33 14 43 25 28 22
39.3 46.9 32.3 14.8 18.8 100.0 100.0 36.0 50.0 58.8 39.0 49.3 18.2 50.6 41.7 39.4 26.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

HOUSEHOLD PARTY

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PURE REP HOUSEHOLD 104 45 59 0 0 0 0 43 61 0 0 0 0 41 19 14 14 13 1 2 0
34.7 77.6 92.2 89.6 82.4 47.7 47.5 32.6 18.9 29.5 33.3 20.0

PURE DEM HOUSEHOLD 78 0 0 0 0 32 46 0 0 0 0 42 36 25 9 10 19 10 0 5 0
26.0 91.4 75.4 82.4 80.0 29.1 22.5 23.3 25.7 22.7 50.0

MIXED PARTY HOUSEHOLD 118 13 5 46 25 3 15 5 13 47 24 9 9 20 12 19 41 21 2 3 0
39.3 22.4 7.8 100.0 100.0 8.6 24.6 10.4 17.6 100.0 100.0 17.6 20.0 23.3 30.0 44.2 55.4 47.7 66.7 30.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

HOUSEHOLD PARTY

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PURE REP HOUSEHOLD 104 75 10 19 7 31 15 31 20 6 7 20 10 16 10 0 9 26
34.7 39.5 33.3 23.8 36.8 32.3 23.8 36.5 54.1 25.0 25.9 40.0 37.0 43.2 28.6 39.1 42.6

PURE DEM HOUSEHOLD 78 47 8 23 2 26 20 22 8 1 6 9 8 10 12 7 9 16
26.0 24.7 26.7 28.8 10.5 27.1 31.7 25.9 21.6 4.2 22.2 18.0 29.6 27.0 34.3 43.8 39.1 26.2

MIXED PARTY HOUSEHOLD 118 68 12 38 10 39 28 32 9 17 14 21 9 11 13 9 5 19
39.3 35.8 40.0 47.5 52.6 40.6 44.4 37.6 24.3 70.8 51.9 42.0 33.3 29.7 37.1 56.3 21.7 31.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

HOUSEHOLD PARTY

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PURE REP HOUSEHOLD 104 51 12 19 22 19 35 43 22 19 34 3 79 1 9 8 4 0 104 0 45 59
34.7 48.1 33.3 22.6 29.7 36.5 49.3 60.6 25.0 19.8 31.8 17.6 39.7 20.0 25.0 23.5 44.4 34.8 25.9 46.8

PURE DEM HOUSEHOLD 78 12 8 37 21 12 10 8 38 41 22 5 49 2 9 11 2 0 78 0 48 30
26.0 11.3 22.2 44.0 28.4 23.1 14.1 11.3 43.2 42.7 20.6 29.4 24.6 40.0 25.0 32.4 22.2 26.1 27.6 23.8

MIXED PARTY HOUSEHOLD 118 43 16 28 31 21 26 20 28 36 51 9 71 2 18 15 3 1 117 0 81 37
39.3 40.6 44.4 33.3 41.9 40.4 36.6 28.2 31.8 37.5 47.7 52.9 35.7 40.0 50.0 44.1 33.3 100.0 39.1 46.6 29.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

BORN IN US

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

US BORN 225 108 117 101 74 42 85 59 81 225 0 0 39 68 47 71 60 48 47 70
75.0 74.5 75.5 82.8 77.1 59.2 81.7 75.6 68.6 100.0 76.5 64.8 70.1 92.2 70.6 80.0 66.2 83.3

FOREIGN BORN 74 36 38 21 21 29 19 18 37 0 74 0 12 36 20 6 24 12 24 14
24.7 24.8 24.5 17.2 21.9 40.8 18.3 23.1 31.4 100.0 23.5 34.3 29.9 7.8 28.2 20.0 33.8 16.7

BIRTHPLACE UNKNOWN 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 100.0 1.0 1.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

BORN IN US

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

US BORN 225 49 52 27 15 27 47 37 64 28 14 35 39 75 34 29 49 29 3 6 0
75.0 84.5 81.3 58.7 60.0 77.1 77.0 77.1 86.5 59.6 58.3 68.6 86.7 87.2 85.0 67.4 66.2 65.9 100.0 60.0

FOREIGN BORN 74 9 12 19 10 7 14 11 10 19 10 15 6 11 6 13 25 15 0 4 0
24.7 15.5 18.8 41.3 40.0 20.0 23.0 22.9 13.5 40.4 41.7 29.4 13.3 12.8 15.0 30.2 33.8 34.1 40.0

BIRTHPLACE UNKNOWN 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0.3 2.9 2.0 2.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

BORN IN US

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

US BORN 225 145 22 58 12 67 39 72 35 16 15 42 24 23 23 13 19 50
75.0 76.3 73.3 72.5 63.2 69.8 61.9 84.7 94.6 66.7 55.6 84.0 88.9 62.2 65.7 81.3 82.6 82.0

FOREIGN BORN 74 44 8 22 6 29 24 13 2 8 12 8 3 14 12 3 3 11
24.7 23.2 26.7 27.5 31.6 30.2 38.1 15.3 5.4 33.3 44.4 16.0 11.1 37.8 34.3 18.8 13.0 18.0

BIRTHPLACE UNKNOWN 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0.3 0.5 5.3 4.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

BORN IN US

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

US BORN 225 80 29 69 47 45 56 56 70 76 71 12 175 5 12 18 3 0 225 0 122 103
75.0 75.5 80.6 82.1 63.5 86.5 78.9 78.9 79.5 79.2 66.4 70.6 87.9 100.0 33.3 52.9 33.3 75.3 70.1 81.7

FOREIGN BORN 74 26 7 15 26 7 15 15 18 20 35 5 23 0 24 16 6 1 73 0 51 23
24.7 24.5 19.4 17.9 35.1 13.5 21.1 21.1 20.5 20.8 32.7 29.4 11.6 66.7 47.1 66.7 100.0 24.4 29.3 18.3

BIRTHPLACE UNKNOWN 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
0.3 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

AGE GROUP

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

18-34 51 33 18 5 18 23 4 17 30 39 12 0 51 0 0 0 33 0 18 0
17.0 22.8 11.6 4.1 18.8 32.4 3.8 21.8 25.4 17.3 16.2 100.0 38.8 25.4

35-54 105 52 53 43 33 24 39 25 41 68 36 1 0 105 0 0 52 0 53 0
35.0 35.9 34.2 35.2 34.4 33.8 37.5 32.1 34.7 30.2 48.6 100.0 100.0 61.2 74.6

55-64 67 37 30 29 18 19 20 14 33 47 20 0 0 0 67 0 0 37 0 30
22.3 25.5 19.4 23.8 18.8 26.8 19.2 17.9 28.0 20.9 27.0 100.0 61.7 35.7

65 AND OLDER 77 23 54 45 27 5 41 22 14 71 6 0 0 0 0 77 0 23 0 54
25.7 15.9 34.8 36.9 28.1 7.0 39.4 28.2 11.9 31.6 8.1 100.0 38.3 64.3

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

AGE GROUP

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

18-34 51 3 2 19 4 7 11 5 0 23 0 18 0 0 3 5 13 23 2 5 0
17.0 5.2 3.1 41.3 16.0 20.0 18.0 10.4 48.9 35.3 7.5 11.6 17.6 52.3 66.7 50.0

35-54 105 26 17 14 10 10 23 43 0 24 0 33 0 17 14 20 35 13 1 5 0
35.0 44.8 26.6 30.4 40.0 28.6 37.7 89.6 51.1 64.7 19.8 35.0 46.5 47.3 29.5 33.3 50.0

55-64 67 13 16 13 6 11 7 0 29 0 19 0 18 22 8 10 21 6 0 0 0
22.3 22.4 25.0 28.3 24.0 31.4 11.5 39.2 79.2 40.0 25.6 20.0 23.3 28.4 13.6

65 AND OLDER 77 16 29 0 5 7 20 0 45 0 5 0 27 47 15 8 5 2 0 0 0
25.7 27.6 45.3 20.0 20.0 32.8 60.8 20.8 60.0 54.7 37.5 18.6 6.8 4.5

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

AGE GROUP

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

18-34 51 32 0 19 9 33 7 2 0 3 4 5 3 4 5 10 6 11
17.0 16.8 23.8 47.4 34.4 11.1 2.4 12.5 14.8 10.0 11.1 10.8 14.3 62.5 26.1 18.0

35-54 105 63 10 32 7 39 24 34 1 14 13 15 7 12 13 5 12 14
35.0 33.2 33.3 40.0 36.8 40.6 38.1 40.0 2.7 58.3 48.1 30.0 25.9 32.4 37.1 31.3 52.2 23.0

55-64 67 35 14 18 2 15 16 23 11 4 4 11 9 9 8 1 0 21
22.3 18.4 46.7 22.5 10.5 15.6 25.4 27.1 29.7 16.7 14.8 22.0 33.3 24.3 22.9 6.3 34.4

65 AND OLDER 77 60 6 11 1 9 16 26 25 3 6 19 8 12 9 0 5 15
25.7 31.6 20.0 13.8 5.3 9.4 25.4 30.6 67.6 12.5 22.2 38.0 29.6 32.4 25.7 21.7 24.6

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

AGE GROUP

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

18-34 51 17 7 7 20 11 11 9 10 15 23 5 25 1 12 8 0 0 51 0 47 4
17.0 16.0 19.4 8.3 27.0 21.2 15.5 12.7 11.4 15.6 21.5 29.4 12.6 20.0 33.3 23.5 17.1 27.0 3.2

35-54 105 42 12 26 25 18 24 26 26 29 40 6 58 2 18 17 4 0 105 0 72 33
35.0 39.6 33.3 31.0 33.8 34.6 33.8 36.6 29.5 30.2 37.4 35.3 29.1 40.0 50.0 50.0 44.4 35.1 41.4 26.2

55-64 67 23 8 23 13 12 17 13 23 24 22 3 48 1 6 6 3 0 67 0 35 32
22.3 21.7 22.2 27.4 17.6 23.1 23.9 18.3 26.1 25.0 20.6 17.6 24.1 20.0 16.7 17.6 33.3 22.4 20.1 25.4

65 AND OLDER 77 24 9 28 16 11 19 23 29 28 22 3 68 1 0 3 2 1 76 0 20 57
25.7 22.6 25.0 33.3 21.6 21.2 26.8 32.4 33.0 29.2 20.6 17.6 34.2 20.0 8.8 22.2 100.0 25.4 11.5 45.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

VOTE PROPENSITY

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

5 Out Of 5 86 32 54 49 30 6 41 25 20 75 11 0 0 17 22 47 7 25 10 44
28.7 22.1 34.8 40.2 31.3 8.5 39.4 32.1 16.9 33.3 14.9 16.2 32.8 61.0 8.2 41.7 14.1 52.4

4 Out Of 5 40 21 19 20 10 8 19 9 12 34 6 0 3 14 8 15 12 9 5 14
13.3 14.5 12.3 16.4 10.4 11.3 18.3 11.5 10.2 15.1 8.1 5.9 13.3 11.9 19.5 14.1 15.0 7.0 16.7

3 Out Of 5 43 26 17 17 13 12 14 10 19 29 13 1 5 20 10 8 16 10 9 8
14.3 17.9 11.0 13.9 13.5 16.9 13.5 12.8 16.1 12.9 17.6 100.0 9.8 19.0 14.9 10.4 18.8 16.7 12.7 9.5

2 Out Of 5 74 38 36 20 24 29 14 19 41 49 25 0 13 35 21 5 24 14 24 12
24.7 26.2 23.2 16.4 25.0 40.8 13.5 24.4 34.7 21.8 33.8 25.5 33.3 31.3 6.5 28.2 23.3 33.8 14.3

1 Out Of 5 44 22 22 13 14 14 13 10 21 29 15 0 23 13 6 2 20 2 16 6
14.7 15.2 14.2 10.7 14.6 19.7 12.5 12.8 17.8 12.9 20.3 45.1 12.4 9.0 2.6 23.5 3.3 22.5 7.1

0 Out Of 5 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 1 0
1.0 1.4 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 1.7 1.3 3.9 1.0 2.4 1.4

100% Not had the chance 10 4 6 2 5 1 2 5 3 6 4 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 6 0
3.3 2.8 3.9 1.6 5.2 1.4 1.9 6.4 2.5 2.7 5.4 9.8 4.8 4.7 8.5

New Registrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

VOTE PROPENSITY

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

5 Out Of 5 86 19 30 3 3 10 20 10 39 2 4 5 25 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28.7 32.8 46.9 6.5 12.0 28.6 32.8 20.8 52.7 4.3 16.7 9.8 55.6 100.0

4 Out Of 5 40 10 10 6 2 4 6 7 13 6 2 2 8 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
13.3 17.2 15.6 13.0 8.0 11.4 9.8 14.6 17.6 12.8 8.3 3.9 17.8 100.0

3 Out Of 5 43 9 8 10 2 6 7 8 9 7 5 9 4 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0
14.3 15.5 12.5 21.7 8.0 17.1 11.5 16.7 12.2 14.9 20.8 17.6 8.9 100.0

2 Out Of 5 74 12 8 18 11 8 16 10 10 18 11 19 5 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0
24.7 20.7 12.5 39.1 44.0 22.9 26.2 20.8 13.5 38.3 45.8 37.3 11.1 100.0

1 Out Of 5 44 7 6 9 5 5 9 10 3 12 2 11 3 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0
14.7 12.1 9.4 19.6 20.0 14.3 14.8 20.8 4.1 25.5 8.3 21.6 6.7 100.0

0 Out Of 5 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
1.0 1.7 4.0 2.1 2.1 100.0

100% Not had the chance 10 0 2 0 1 2 3 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
3.3 3.1 4.0 5.7 4.9 4.2 2.1 9.8 100.0

New Registrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

VOTE PROPENSITY

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

5 Out Of 5 86 62 15 9 0 6 19 36 25 5 7 13 14 16 10 2 1 18
28.7 32.6 50.0 11.3 6.3 30.2 42.4 67.6 20.8 25.9 26.0 51.9 43.2 28.6 12.5 4.3 29.5

4 Out Of 5 40 30 1 9 2 11 10 15 2 5 1 7 2 6 6 1 5 7
13.3 15.8 3.3 11.3 10.5 11.5 15.9 17.6 5.4 20.8 3.7 14.0 7.4 16.2 17.1 6.3 21.7 11.5

3 Out Of 5 43 23 6 14 4 11 10 13 5 3 3 13 1 4 8 0 3 8
14.3 12.1 20.0 17.5 21.1 11.5 15.9 15.3 13.5 12.5 11.1 26.0 3.7 10.8 22.9 13.0 13.1

2 Out Of 5 74 27 8 39 4 26 21 18 5 7 9 10 6 9 5 5 5 18
24.7 14.2 26.7 48.8 21.1 27.1 33.3 21.2 13.5 29.2 33.3 20.0 22.2 24.3 14.3 31.3 21.7 29.5

1 Out Of 5 44 40 0 4 3 35 3 3 0 3 6 5 0 2 5 8 5 10
14.7 21.1 5.0 15.8 36.5 4.8 3.5 12.5 22.2 10.0 5.4 14.3 50.0 21.7 16.4

0 Out Of 5 3 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
1.0 1.6 15.8 3.7 3.7 4.3

100% Not had the chance 10 5 0 5 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 3 0
3.3 2.6 6.3 15.8 7.3 4.2 4.0 11.1 2.9 13.0

New Registrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

VOTE PROPENSITY

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

5 Out Of 5 86 32 4 35 15 12 22 25 34 35 21 5 72 1 1 4 3 0 86 0 23 63
28.7 30.2 11.1 41.7 20.3 23.1 31.0 35.2 38.6 36.5 19.6 29.4 36.2 20.0 2.8 11.8 33.3 28.8 13.2 50.0

4 Out Of 5 40 15 7 12 6 7 13 12 12 14 11 2 25 1 6 6 0 0 40 0 21 19
13.3 14.2 19.4 14.3 8.1 13.5 18.3 16.9 13.6 14.6 10.3 11.8 12.6 20.0 16.7 17.6 13.4 12.1 15.1

3 Out Of 5 43 13 5 12 13 10 7 10 10 9 19 1 30 0 4 6 2 0 43 0 25 18
14.3 12.3 13.9 14.3 17.6 19.2 9.9 14.1 11.4 9.4 17.8 5.9 15.1 11.1 17.6 22.2 14.4 14.4 14.3

2 Out Of 5 74 28 9 16 21 13 16 13 19 16 34 3 42 3 12 12 2 1 73 0 54 20
24.7 26.4 25.0 19.0 28.4 25.0 22.5 18.3 21.6 16.7 31.8 17.6 21.1 60.0 33.3 35.3 22.2 100.0 24.4 31.0 15.9

1 Out Of 5 44 14 9 6 15 7 10 8 10 18 17 5 21 0 11 6 1 0 44 0 39 5
14.7 13.2 25.0 7.1 20.3 13.5 14.1 11.3 11.4 18.8 15.9 29.4 10.6 30.6 17.6 11.1 14.7 22.4 4.0

0 Out Of 5 3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0
1.0 0.9 2.8 1.2 1.4 1.4 2.3 2.1 1.5 1.0 1.7

100% Not had the chance 10 3 1 2 4 3 2 2 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 1 0 10 0 9 1
3.3 2.8 2.8 2.4 5.4 5.8 2.8 2.8 1.1 2.1 4.7 5.9 3.0 5.6 11.1 3.3 5.2 0.8

New Registrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

TYPE OF VOTER

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PERMANENT VOTE-BY-MAIL 190 86 104 82 58 42 75 47 68 145 44 1 32 63 35 60 51 35 44 60
VOTER 63.3 59.3 67.1 67.2 60.4 59.2 72.1 60.3 57.6 64.4 59.5 100.0 62.7 60.0 52.2 77.9 60.0 58.3 62.0 71.4

PREVIOUS VOTE-BY-MAIL VOTER 30 16 14 14 9 7 10 8 12 22 8 0 0 10 14 6 6 10 4 10
10.0 11.0 9.0 11.5 9.4 9.9 9.6 10.3 10.2 9.8 10.8 9.5 20.9 7.8 7.1 16.7 5.6 11.9

ELECTION DAY VOTER 80 43 37 26 29 22 19 23 38 58 22 0 19 32 18 11 28 15 23 14
26.7 29.7 23.9 21.3 30.2 31.0 18.3 29.5 32.2 25.8 29.7 37.3 30.5 26.9 14.3 32.9 25.0 32.4 16.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

TYPE OF VOTER

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PERMANENT VOTE-BY-MAIL 190 38 44 27 15 17 41 32 50 28 14 27 31 62 30 23 27 40 3 5 0
VOTER 63.3 65.5 68.8 58.7 60.0 48.6 67.2 66.7 67.6 59.6 58.3 52.9 68.9 72.1 75.0 53.5 36.5 90.9 100.0 50.0

PREVIOUS VOTE-BY-MAIL VOTER 30 5 9 6 1 5 4 4 10 2 5 4 5 15 1 6 8 0 0 0 0
10.0 8.6 14.1 13.0 4.0 14.3 6.6 8.3 13.5 4.3 20.8 7.8 11.1 17.4 2.5 14.0 10.8

ELECTION DAY VOTER 80 15 11 13 9 13 16 12 14 17 5 20 9 9 9 14 39 4 0 5 0
26.7 25.9 17.2 28.3 36.0 37.1 26.2 25.0 18.9 36.2 20.8 39.2 20.0 10.5 22.5 32.6 52.7 9.1 50.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

TYPE OF VOTER

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PERMANENT VOTE-BY-MAIL 190 190 0 0 14 67 37 49 23 19 15 33 13 24 19 10 18 39
VOTER 63.3 100.0 73.7 69.8 58.7 57.6 62.2 79.2 55.6 66.0 48.1 64.9 54.3 62.5 78.3 63.9

PREVIOUS VOTE-BY-MAIL VOTER 30 0 30 0 1 3 7 14 5 0 4 5 5 5 4 1 0 6
10.0 100.0 5.3 3.1 11.1 16.5 13.5 14.8 10.0 18.5 13.5 11.4 6.3 9.8

ELECTION DAY VOTER 80 0 0 80 4 26 19 22 9 5 8 12 9 8 12 5 5 16
26.7 100.0 21.1 27.1 30.2 25.9 24.3 20.8 29.6 24.0 33.3 21.6 34.3 31.3 21.7 26.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

TYPE OF VOTER

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PERMANENT VOTE-BY-MAIL 190 63 23 55 49 28 43 48 56 62 70 7 136 2 23 17 5 0 190 0 107 83
VOTER 63.3 59.4 63.9 65.5 66.2 53.8 60.6 67.6 63.6 64.6 65.4 41.2 68.3 40.0 63.9 50.0 55.6 63.5 61.5 65.9

PREVIOUS VOTE-BY-MAIL VOTER 30 14 0 11 5 6 8 10 11 10 7 5 18 1 1 2 3 0 30 0 12 18
10.0 13.2 13.1 6.8 11.5 11.3 14.1 12.5 10.4 6.5 29.4 9.0 20.0 2.8 5.9 33.3 10.0 6.9 14.3

ELECTION DAY VOTER 80 29 13 18 20 18 20 13 21 24 30 5 45 2 12 15 1 1 79 0 55 25
26.7 27.4 36.1 21.4 27.0 34.6 28.2 18.3 23.9 25.0 28.0 29.4 22.6 40.0 33.3 44.1 11.1 100.0 26.4 31.6 19.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GEOGRAPHIC

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

92602 24 12 12 7 7 7 6 1 17 16 8 0 3 14 4 3 7 5 10 2
8.0 8.3 7.7 5.7 7.3 9.9 5.8 1.3 14.4 7.1 10.8 5.9 13.3 6.0 3.9 8.2 8.3 14.1 2.4

92603 27 13 14 8 8 9 7 6 14 15 12 0 4 13 4 6 10 3 7 7
9.0 9.0 9.0 6.6 8.3 12.7 6.7 7.7 11.9 6.7 16.2 7.8 12.4 6.0 7.8 11.8 5.0 9.9 8.3

92604 50 20 30 27 12 10 20 9 21 42 8 0 5 15 11 19 14 6 6 24
16.7 13.8 19.4 22.1 12.5 14.1 19.2 11.5 17.8 18.7 10.8 9.8 14.3 16.4 24.7 16.5 10.0 8.5 28.6

92606 27 14 13 14 9 4 10 8 9 24 3 0 3 7 9 8 3 11 7 6
9.0 9.7 8.4 11.5 9.4 5.6 9.6 10.3 7.6 10.7 4.1 5.9 6.7 13.4 10.4 3.5 18.3 9.9 7.1

92612 37 19 18 18 10 8 16 10 11 23 14 0 4 12 9 12 10 9 6 12
12.3 13.1 11.6 14.8 10.4 11.3 15.4 12.8 9.3 10.2 18.9 7.8 11.4 13.4 15.6 11.8 15.0 8.5 14.3

92614 35 19 16 11 14 9 10 12 13 23 12 0 5 13 8 9 10 9 8 8
11.7 13.1 10.3 9.0 14.6 12.7 9.6 15.4 11.0 10.2 16.2 9.8 12.4 11.9 11.7 11.8 15.0 11.3 9.5

92617 16 9 7 0 8 8 0 7 9 13 3 0 10 5 1 0 8 1 7 0
5.3 6.2 4.5 8.3 11.3 9.0 7.6 5.8 4.1 19.6 4.8 1.5 9.4 1.7 9.9

92618 23 11 12 9 9 4 9 9 5 19 3 1 6 12 0 5 10 1 8 4
7.7 7.6 7.7 7.4 9.4 5.6 8.7 11.5 4.2 8.4 4.1 100.0 11.8 11.4 6.5 11.8 1.7 11.3 4.8

92620 61 28 33 28 19 12 26 16 19 50 11 0 11 14 21 15 13 15 12 21
20.3 19.3 21.3 23.0 19.8 16.9 25.0 20.5 16.1 22.2 14.9 21.6 13.3 31.3 19.5 15.3 25.0 16.9 25.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GEOGRAPHIC

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

92602 24 6 1 4 3 1 6 5 2 5 2 4 3 5 5 3 7 3 0 1 0
8.0 10.3 1.6 8.7 12.0 2.9 9.8 10.4 2.7 10.6 8.3 7.8 6.7 5.8 12.5 7.0 9.5 6.8 10.0

92603 27 5 3 4 5 3 5 3 5 8 1 4 4 7 1 3 9 6 1 0 0
9.0 8.6 4.7 8.7 20.0 8.6 8.2 6.3 6.8 17.0 4.2 7.8 8.9 8.1 2.5 7.0 12.2 13.6 33.3

92604 50 10 17 6 4 3 9 9 18 5 5 5 7 13 7 13 10 5 0 2 0
16.7 17.2 26.6 13.0 16.0 8.6 14.8 18.8 24.3 10.6 20.8 9.8 15.6 15.1 17.5 30.2 13.5 11.4 20.0

92606 27 9 5 2 2 3 6 6 8 2 2 2 7 14 2 1 6 0 1 3 0
9.0 15.5 7.8 4.3 8.0 8.6 9.8 12.5 10.8 4.3 8.3 3.9 15.6 16.3 5.0 2.3 8.1 33.3 30.0

92612 37 8 10 6 2 5 5 7 11 4 4 4 6 16 6 4 9 2 0 0 0
12.3 13.8 15.6 13.0 8.0 14.3 8.2 14.6 14.9 8.5 16.7 7.8 13.3 18.6 15.0 9.3 12.2 4.5

92614 35 7 4 8 1 3 11 2 9 7 2 8 6 10 6 8 5 5 0 1 0
11.7 12.1 6.3 17.4 4.0 8.6 18.0 4.2 12.2 14.9 8.3 15.7 13.3 11.6 15.0 18.6 6.8 11.4 10.0

92617 16 0 0 5 3 4 4 0 0 8 0 7 1 2 1 0 5 8 0 0 0
5.3 10.9 12.0 11.4 6.6 17.0 13.7 2.2 2.3 2.5 6.8 18.2

92618 23 0 9 4 0 6 3 5 4 4 0 8 1 1 5 3 5 5 1 3 0
7.7 14.1 8.7 17.1 4.9 10.4 5.4 8.5 15.7 2.2 1.2 12.5 7.0 6.8 11.4 33.3 30.0

92620 61 13 15 7 5 7 12 11 17 4 8 9 10 18 7 8 18 10 0 0 0
20.3 22.4 23.4 15.2 20.0 20.0 19.7 22.9 23.0 8.5 33.3 17.6 22.2 20.9 17.5 18.6 24.3 22.7

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GEOGRAPHIC

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

92602 24 19 0 5 2 7 4 11 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.0 10.0 6.3 10.5 7.3 6.3 12.9 100.0

92603 27 15 4 8 2 9 7 6 3 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9.0 7.9 13.3 10.0 10.5 9.4 11.1 7.1 8.1 100.0

92604 50 33 5 12 3 11 10 17 9 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
16.7 17.4 16.7 15.0 15.8 11.5 15.9 20.0 24.3 100.0

92606 27 13 5 9 2 5 5 8 7 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0
9.0 6.8 16.7 11.3 10.5 5.2 7.9 9.4 18.9 100.0

92612 37 24 5 8 3 12 5 13 4 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0
12.3 12.6 16.7 10.0 15.8 12.5 7.9 15.3 10.8 100.0

92614 35 19 4 12 2 11 9 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0
11.7 10.0 13.3 15.0 10.5 11.5 14.3 9.4 13.5 100.0

92617 16 10 1 5 1 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0
5.3 5.3 3.3 6.3 5.3 9.4 6.3 2.4 100.0

92618 23 18 0 5 4 12 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0
7.7 9.5 6.3 21.1 12.5 4.8 3.5 2.7 100.0

92620 61 39 6 16 0 20 16 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
20.3 20.5 20.0 20.0 20.8 25.4 20.0 21.6 100.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

GEOGRAPHIC

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

92602 24 10 2 6 6 1 7 4 8 6 11 0 15 1 3 5 0 0 24 0 17 7
8.0 9.4 5.6 7.1 8.1 1.9 9.9 5.6 9.1 6.3 10.3 7.5 20.0 8.3 14.7 8.0 9.8 5.6

92603 27 9 2 9 7 2 4 5 10 11 10 2 16 0 4 4 1 1 26 0 17 10
9.0 8.5 5.6 10.7 9.5 3.8 5.6 7.0 11.4 11.5 9.3 11.8 8.0 11.1 11.8 11.1 100.0 8.7 9.8 7.9

92604 50 20 7 13 10 11 9 11 12 13 21 1 38 0 6 3 2 0 50 0 28 22
16.7 18.9 19.4 15.5 13.5 21.2 12.7 15.5 13.6 13.5 19.6 5.9 19.1 16.7 8.8 22.2 16.7 16.1 17.5

92606 27 9 2 6 10 6 5 7 8 7 10 3 18 1 3 1 1 0 27 0 9 18
9.0 8.5 5.6 7.1 13.5 11.5 7.0 9.9 9.1 7.3 9.3 17.6 9.0 20.0 8.3 2.9 11.1 9.0 5.2 14.3

92612 37 13 3 14 7 4 11 9 11 11 14 1 23 1 3 8 1 0 37 0 19 18
12.3 12.3 8.3 16.7 9.5 7.7 15.5 12.7 12.5 11.5 13.1 5.9 11.6 20.0 8.3 23.5 11.1 12.4 10.9 14.3

92614 35 11 6 11 7 9 11 10 10 14 7 1 22 0 5 5 2 0 35 0 24 11
11.7 10.4 16.7 13.1 9.5 17.3 15.5 14.1 11.4 14.6 6.5 5.9 11.1 13.9 14.7 22.2 11.7 13.8 8.7

92617 16 6 3 3 4 2 6 2 4 8 5 3 6 1 3 3 0 0 16 0 14 2
5.3 5.7 8.3 3.6 5.4 3.8 8.5 2.8 4.5 8.3 4.7 17.6 3.0 20.0 8.3 8.8 5.4 8.0 1.6

92618 23 4 5 7 7 5 3 2 6 11 9 2 17 0 2 1 1 0 23 0 15 8
7.7 3.8 13.9 8.3 9.5 9.6 4.2 2.8 6.8 11.5 8.4 11.8 8.5 5.6 2.9 11.1 7.7 8.6 6.3

92620 61 24 6 15 16 12 15 21 19 15 20 4 44 1 7 4 1 0 61 0 31 30
20.3 22.6 16.7 17.9 21.6 23.1 21.1 29.6 21.6 15.6 18.7 23.5 22.1 20.0 19.4 11.8 11.1 20.4 17.8 23.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

REGISTRATION DATE

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Less Than One Year 19 14 5 7 2 7 7 2 10 12 6 1 9 7 2 1 12 2 4 1
6.3 9.7 3.2 5.7 2.1 9.9 6.7 2.6 8.5 5.3 8.1 100.0 17.6 6.7 3.0 1.3 14.1 3.3 5.6 1.2

Up To 5 Years 96 49 47 33 30 27 31 26 39 67 29 0 33 39 15 9 38 11 34 13
32.0 33.8 30.3 27.0 31.3 38.0 29.8 33.3 33.1 29.8 39.2 64.7 37.1 22.4 11.7 44.7 18.3 47.9 15.5

Up To 10 Years 63 29 34 17 24 21 15 20 28 39 24 0 7 24 16 16 19 10 12 22
21.0 20.0 21.9 13.9 25.0 29.6 14.4 25.6 23.7 17.3 32.4 13.7 22.9 23.9 20.8 22.4 16.7 16.9 26.2

Up To 20 Years 85 38 47 39 30 15 31 22 32 72 13 0 2 34 23 26 16 22 20 27
28.3 26.2 30.3 32.0 31.3 21.1 29.8 28.2 27.1 32.0 17.6 3.9 32.4 34.3 33.8 18.8 36.7 28.2 32.1

More Than 20 Years 37 15 22 26 10 1 20 8 9 35 2 0 0 1 11 25 0 15 1 21
12.3 10.3 14.2 21.3 10.4 1.4 19.2 10.3 7.6 15.6 2.7 1.0 16.4 32.5 25.0 1.4 25.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

REGISTRATION DATE

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Less Than One Year 19 4 3 5 2 2 0 5 2 7 0 1 1 0 2 4 4 3 3 3 0
6.3 6.9 4.7 10.9 8.0 5.7 10.4 2.7 14.9 2.0 2.2 5.0 9.3 5.4 6.8 100.0 30.0

Up To 5 Years 96 16 17 18 9 12 18 21 12 20 7 25 5 6 11 11 26 35 0 7 0
32.0 27.6 26.6 39.1 36.0 34.3 29.5 43.8 16.2 42.6 29.2 49.0 11.1 7.0 27.5 25.6 35.1 79.5 70.0

Up To 10 Years 63 6 11 14 7 9 15 5 12 13 8 12 12 19 10 10 21 3 0 0 0
21.0 10.3 17.2 30.4 28.0 25.7 24.6 10.4 16.2 27.7 33.3 23.5 26.7 22.1 25.0 23.3 28.4 6.8

Up To 20 Years 85 22 17 9 6 7 23 17 22 7 8 12 18 36 15 13 18 3 0 0 0
28.3 37.9 26.6 19.6 24.0 20.0 37.7 35.4 29.7 14.9 33.3 23.5 40.0 41.9 37.5 30.2 24.3 6.8

More Than 20 Years 37 10 16 0 1 5 5 0 26 0 1 1 9 25 2 5 5 0 0 0 0
12.3 17.2 25.0 4.0 14.3 8.2 35.1 4.2 2.0 20.0 29.1 5.0 11.6 6.8

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

REGISTRATION DATE

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Less Than One Year 19 14 1 4 19 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 4 0
6.3 7.4 3.3 5.0 100.0 8.3 7.4 6.0 7.4 8.1 5.7 6.3 17.4

Up To 5 Years 96 67 3 26 0 96 0 0 0 7 9 11 5 12 11 9 12 20
32.0 35.3 10.0 32.5 100.0 29.2 33.3 22.0 18.5 32.4 31.4 56.3 52.2 32.8

Up To 10 Years 63 37 7 19 0 0 63 0 0 4 7 10 5 5 9 4 3 16
21.0 19.5 23.3 23.8 100.0 16.7 25.9 20.0 18.5 13.5 25.7 25.0 13.0 26.2

Up To 20 Years 85 49 14 22 0 0 0 85 0 11 6 17 8 13 8 2 3 17
28.3 25.8 46.7 27.5 100.0 45.8 22.2 34.0 29.6 35.1 22.9 12.5 13.0 27.9

More Than 20 Years 37 23 5 9 0 0 0 0 37 0 3 9 7 4 5 0 1 8
12.3 12.1 16.7 11.3 100.0 11.1 18.0 25.9 10.8 14.3 4.3 13.1

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

REGISTRATION DATE

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Less Than One Year 19 6 3 3 7 2 5 5 4 8 7 1 13 0 4 0 1 0 19 0 18 1
6.3 5.7 8.3 3.6 9.5 3.8 7.0 7.0 4.5 8.3 6.5 5.9 6.5 11.1 11.1 6.4 10.3 0.8

Up To 5 Years 96 33 8 22 33 19 23 23 22 22 40 7 55 1 16 15 2 0 96 0 79 17
32.0 31.1 22.2 26.2 44.6 36.5 32.4 32.4 25.0 22.9 37.4 41.2 27.6 20.0 44.4 44.1 22.2 32.1 45.4 13.5

Up To 10 Years 63 20 11 17 15 9 9 11 22 21 26 5 31 2 12 11 2 1 62 0 40 23
21.0 18.9 30.6 20.2 20.3 17.3 12.7 15.5 25.0 21.9 24.3 29.4 15.6 40.0 33.3 32.4 22.2 100.0 20.7 23.0 18.3

Up To 20 Years 85 33 12 27 13 15 25 22 24 32 25 3 69 2 3 5 3 0 85 0 32 53
28.3 31.1 33.3 32.1 17.6 28.8 35.2 31.0 27.3 33.3 23.4 17.6 34.7 40.0 8.3 14.7 33.3 28.4 18.4 42.1

More Than 20 Years 37 14 2 15 6 7 9 10 16 13 9 1 31 0 1 3 1 0 37 0 5 32
12.3 13.2 5.6 17.9 8.1 13.5 12.7 14.1 18.2 13.5 8.4 5.9 15.6 2.8 8.8 11.1 12.4 2.9 25.4

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PHONETYPE

Base: Total sample
GENDER PARTY HOUSEHOLD PARTY BORN IN US AGE GROUP GENDER/AGE
============== ==================== ==================== ===================== =========================== ===========================
MEN WOMEN
------------- -------------
PURE PURE MIXED BIRTH-
REP DEM PARTY PLACE
HOUSE- HOUSE- HOUSE- US FOREIGN UN- 65 AND
TOTAL MALE FEMALE REP DEM DTS HOLD HOLD HOLD BORN BORN KNOWN 18-34 35-54 55-64 OLDER 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 145 155 122 96 71 104 78 118 225 74 1 51 105 67 77 85 60 71 84
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CELL 174 93 81 55 59 49 45 48 81 122 51 1 47 72 35 20 67 26 52 29
58.0 64.1 52.3 45.1 61.5 69.0 43.3 61.5 68.6 54.2 68.9 100.0 92.2 68.6 52.2 26.0 78.8 43.3 73.2 34.5

LANDLINE 126 52 74 67 37 22 59 30 37 103 23 0 4 33 32 57 18 34 19 55
42.0 35.9 47.7 54.9 38.5 31.0 56.7 38.5 31.4 45.8 31.1 7.8 31.4 47.8 74.0 21.2 56.7 26.8 65.5

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PHONETYPE

Base: Total sample
PARTY/GENDER PARTY/AGE VOTE PROPENSITY
========================================= ========================================= =======================================================
GOP DTS DEM GOP DTS DEM
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
100%
NOT
HAD
5 OUT 4 OUT 3 OUT 2 OUT 1 OUT 0 OUT THE NEW
TOTAL MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ 18-54 55+ OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 OF 5 CHANCE REG
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 58 64 46 25 35 61 48 74 47 24 51 45 86 40 43 74 44 3 10 0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CELL 174 29 26 35 14 23 36 32 23 37 12 40 19 23 21 25 54 39 3 9 0
58.0 50.0 40.6 76.1 56.0 65.7 59.0 66.7 31.1 78.7 50.0 78.4 42.2 26.7 52.5 58.1 73.0 88.6 100.0 90.0

LANDLINE 126 29 38 11 11 12 25 16 51 10 12 11 26 63 19 18 20 5 0 1 0
42.0 50.0 59.4 23.9 44.0 34.3 41.0 33.3 68.9 21.3 50.0 21.6 57.8 73.3 47.5 41.9 27.0 11.4 10.0

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PHONETYPE

Base: Total sample
TYPE OF VOTER REGISTRATION DATE GEOGRAPHIC
==================== ================================== ==============================================================
UP TO UP TO UP TO >20
TOTAL PERM PREV ELECT <1 YR 5 YRS 10 YRS 20 YRS YRS 92602 92603 92604 92606 92612 92614 92617 92618 92620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Total 300 190 30 80 19 96 63 85 37 24 27 50 27 37 35 16 23 61
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CELL 174 107 12 55 18 79 40 32 5 17 17 28 9 19 24 14 15 31
58.0 56.3 40.0 68.8 94.7 82.3 63.5 37.6 13.5 70.8 63.0 56.0 33.3 51.4 68.6 87.5 65.2 50.8

LANDLINE 126 83 18 25 1 17 23 53 32 7 10 22 18 18 11 2 8 30
42.0 43.7 60.0 31.3 5.3 17.7 36.5 62.4 86.5 29.2 37.0 44.0 66.7 48.6 31.4 12.5 34.8 49.2

City of Irvine Voter Survey
October 2014

PHONETYPE

Base: Total sample
MAYOR BALLOT TEST COUNCIL BALLOT TEST ETHNICITY LANGUAGE PHONETYPE
========================== =========================================== ====================================== ================= ===========
UNSURE/ UNSURE/ SPA- ENG- CHI- LAND
TOTAL CHOI DAIGLE GAIDO REFUSED CHEMERS SCHOTT LALLOWAY AGRAN FOX REFUSED LATINO WHITE BLACK ASIAN OTHER REFUSED NISH LISH NESE CELL LINE
----- ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ -------- ----- ----- ------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Total 300 106 36 84 74 52 71 71 88 96 107 17 199 5 36 34 9 1 299 0 174 126
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CELL 174 59 22 44 49 33 37 39 44 53 68 11 102 3 30 24 4 0 174 0 174 0
58.0 55.7 61.1 52.4 66.2 63.5 52.1 54.9 50.0 55.2 63.6 64.7 51.3 60.0 83.3 70.6 44.4 58.2 100.0

LANDLINE 126 47 14 40 25 19 34 32 44 43 39 6 97 2 6 10 5 1 125 0 0 126
42.0 44.3 38.9 47.6 33.8 36.5 47.9 45.1 50.0 44.8 36.4 35.3 48.7 40.0 16.7 29.4 55.6 100.0 41.8 100.0

S-ar putea să vă placă și