0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
21 vizualizări2 pagini
Whenever we confront grave challenges that threaten to undermine our posterity we retreat back to what is most familiar while neglecting what we've historically learned all along.
Whenever we confront grave challenges that threaten to undermine our posterity we retreat back to what is most familiar while neglecting what we've historically learned all along.
Whenever we confront grave challenges that threaten to undermine our posterity we retreat back to what is most familiar while neglecting what we've historically learned all along.
It is commonly believed that when history repeats itself there is a marshaled force of human endeavor behind it. From the standpoint of human history that may seem to be irrefutably true, but often times we are the literal accessories that lead to our own demise. Our technologies have built these complexes of indestructibility and with that personified complex certain arrogance arises as a direct byproduct. Despite the advancing strides that have been made toward conquering and curbing various diseases weve collectively failed as a species toward effectuating either. Why? Most of our efforts have been posited toward treatments as opposed to cures; nonetheless, the former does eventually give way to the latter. The means and methods which reintroduce a deadly plague back into our midst are pathologically unique from the actual sourced origin. The disease is characteristically the same, but when the earliest onset of a disease arrives we are usually unprepared to address its grave implications once theyve returned in our own backyards. How is it possible to salvage methodical knowledge when it is culturally forgotten and ordained into esoteric and fringe circles? From the standpoint of the resolute, an inquiry of the times emerges which simply states the following: how do we deliver an effectuating change that is able to eternally preserve itself throughout time? That refers to an abstract paradigm that prepares a mindset, but doesnt create the actual methodological remedy; in the ancient Hellenistic world synthetically infused vaccinations simply didnt exist. Perhaps that is a little too much to hope for in a world where information is lost because it is tossed out for pragmatic convenience. The arrival of a deadly plague has an uncanny ability in reiterating a highly neglected fact that seemingly hides beneath the deepest depths of history. It is for that specific reason why we must realize that diseases flourish because we dont immediately realize that they are put on ice as opposed to dying out completely. 2
It may take thousands of years for the same deadly plague to strike again, but once it resurfaces we are always swindled by our licentious belief in the superiority of our contemporary civilizations. When asking the impossible it is always in our best interest to entertain an endemic alternative to the greatest capacity possible. Strides that relentlessly advance toward the pursuit of esoteric knowledge are institutionally guarded and regarded as state secrets kept from the domain of the common good. What can introduce so much salvation becomes a weapon of mass destruction in its own diabolical right. An epithet for population control may seem as a deplorable evil when used as justification for unleashing deadly agents on highly saturated population centers, but an artificially manufactured morality has the tendency of emerging in a future that exonerates tactics of genocide as necessary evils that secured that big picture prize. The most frightening aspect of that reality is that it doesnt tacitly imply anything specific that defines the specifics of that prize, but there is an implied implication that surfaces which reminds us of what can happen when an elite few become over indulged with their sardonic view of the world.