Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
is a nonprofit, nonpolitical, educational organization dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of state
and church, accepting the explanation
of Thomas Jefferson that the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States was meant to create a
"wall of separation" between state and
church.
American Atheists is organized
to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning religious beliefs, creeds, dogmas,
tenets, rituals, and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data, and literature on all
religions and promote a more thorough understanding ofthem, their origins, and their histories;
to advocate, labor for, and promote in all lawful ways the complete
and absolute separation of state and
church;
to act as a "watch dog" to challenge any attempted breach of the
wall of separatrion between state and
church;
to advocate, labor for, and promote in all lawful ways the establishment and maintenance of a thoroughly secular system of education available to all;
- - -..:....- - - - - - -
-$150/year
-$60/year,
-$35/year,
-$25/year,
-$25/year,
International
International
International
International
$70/year
$45/year
$35/year
$35/year
of ID
All membership categories receive our monthly American Atheist Newsletter, membership cardts), and additional
organizational mailings such as new products for sale, convention and meeting announcements, etc.
Telephone:
American
A Journal
of Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Atheist
39
19
Emily Dickinson:
Pagan Sphinx
Gary Sloan
26
29
32
Winter 2001-2002
Kevin Courcey
A review of So Help Me God:
43
46
49
Page 1
American
Atheist
Volume 40 Number
Lastname:.
Firstname:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
This is to certify that I am in agreement with the aims, purposes, and the definitions given by American Atheists inside the front cover. I consider myself to be an
A-theist (i.e., non-theist) or Materialist and I have, therefore, a particular interest in
the separation of state and church and the efforts ofAmerican Atheists Inc. on behalf
of that principle.
As an Atheist I hereby make application for membership in American Atheists
Inc., said membership being open only to Atheists.
Signature.
Date:
Signature.
Date:
Those not comfortable with the appellation "Atheist" may not be admitted to
membership but are invited to subscribe to the American Atheist magazine or the
American Atheist Newsletter. Both dues and contributions are to a tax-exempt organization and may be deducted on income tax returns, subject to applicable laws. (This
application must be dated and signed by the applicant to be accepted.) Memberships
are non-refundable.
Membership in American Atheists Inc. includes a free subscription to the
American Atheist Newsletter and all the other rights and privileges of membership.
Please indicate your choice of membership dues:
o
o
o
o
o
Atheist,
a quarterly
journal,
Page 2
is available
to the American
separately
for
Atheist.
American Atheist
Editor's Desk
Frank R. Zindler
Parsippany, New Jersey
Russian Atheists
Petition Government
(Translated from the Russian by Mark R. Hatlie)
The document
below is a
Declaration adopted" by the First
Anticlerical Conference, which was
held in Russia early this year. This
Declaration, together with an Open
Letter, was sent to President Putin
and Prime Minister Kasyanov. The
Open Letter was made public on 20
April 2001 at a press conference that
received some media coverage (It was
even mentioned in the Guardian and
the Observer).
Signatures
to support
the
Declaration were collected in just a
few Russian cities, most prominently,
Moscow and St. Petersburg.
The
Declaration was signed by scientists
of different status and rank (including three Academicians), university
students, and other citizens. Mr.
Sergey Kovalyov,
a well-known
human rights activist, also put his
name to the document.
This Declaration is the first serious attempt, after the collapse of
Communism, to make the voice of
non-believers heard. Of course, it
goes against the pro-religious trend
that currently prevails in Russia. But
it is only the first step.
In Defense of Freedom
of Conscience and a
Secular State
American Atheist
An Atheist's Guide to
Mohammedanism
By Frank R. Zindler
ohammedans don't like to be called Mohammedans - that smacks too much of terms such as
Christians. As everybody knows, Christians worship Christ as a god. Mohammedans don't want people to
think they worship Mohammed (Arabic, Muhammad" *In transliterating Arabic, Hebrew, and other Semitic languages several special characters are required for sounds that
either are not found in English or are not recognized as separate sounds having their own alphabetic characters. The character I ' I is used to represent the glottal stop - the brief constriction of the throat that occurs when one pronounces a
vowel at the beginning of an isolated word, but which is often
absent when the word is preceded by an. Thus, we have 'apple,
pronounced with a glottal stop, but 'an apple which, when
smoothly pronounced, lacks the glottal stop before the second
a. In Semitic languages, the glottal stop is given a symbol of
its own and has the honor of being the first letter of the alphabet - alef - although in Arabic it carries a special diacritical
mark called hamza to make it clear that the glottal stop is
actually pronounced. Modern Arabic and ancient Hebrew have
another special sound, a deep-throated, laryngeal glide, which
is lacking in English but is considered to be a separate letter
of the alphabet - ayin - and is transliterated with the special
character I' I The difference between alef I ' I and ayin I
c I can be illustrated
by two rather undignified examples. A
string of alefs (glottal stops) is pronounced when one imitates
the sound of a machine-gun: -aal-aal-aal-aal-aal The ayin, on
the other hand, is the dipping glide one makes when imitating
the sound of an automobile engine being started up when it's
ten below zero: aah -aah , 'aah , -aah , -aah, Arabic, like most
Semitic languages, has three gradations of aitch. The lightest
of them, transliterated as h, is identical to the aitch of English.
The harshest of them, usually transliterated as kh, is like the
ch in the German name Bach. The middle aitch, transliterated with the special character h, is pretty much like the sound
one makes when breathing heavily on bifocals to fog them for
cleaning.
Winter 2001-2002
Page 5
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
having been his employer at the time. Only after her death
claimed to be one of the precious stones of paradise given
in 620 did Mohammed begin to practice polygamy, taking
by the angel Gabriel to the patriarch Abraham when he
perhaps a dozen wives. Only one of his children survived,
built the Kaaba - in Arabia, contrary to Jewish and
however, a daughter named Fatima.
Christian opinion! Even though the
stone has been stolen, burned, and bro(She married her father's cousin -Ali,
613 CE
ken, it is the veneration focal point for
making him the ancestor of all the
Mohammed begins
more than a billion Muslims in the
prophet's later descendants.)
Tradition also tells us that in the
preaching?
world today. (With so many Muslims
year
610, while meditating in a cave outrequired to come to Mecca, the logistics
Flight
of
his
followers
side
Mecca, a supernatural voice (later
of the Hajj are rapidly bursting the
identified
as the voice of the angel
to
Ethiopia?
bounds of the possible.) The Kaaba temGabriel, the same heavenly messenger
ple is widely believed to be older than
that previously had delivered the results of the pregnancy
Mohammed, having housed the pagan Arabian pantheon.
test to the Virgin Mary) commanded him to "Recite in the
All its idols were destroyed when it was adapted to serve
name of thy Lord, who created." Thus began the alleged
the Islamic cultus.
revelations of the Qur'an. This event is revered as the
When in Mecca kissing the Ka-aba, it is also incumbent
"First Call" of the prophet and has been
upon pilgrims to kill an animal in the
immortalized as the "Night of Power."
Mina valley on the tenth day of the
619 CE
At least at first, Mohammed's 'revemonth of pilgrimage, since Allah, like
the Yahweh of the Jews, is believed to Deaths of Khadija and lations' were like those of other oracles,
soothsayers, and religious con-artists
enjoy having animals killed for his viewAbu Talib?
whose utterances
took the form of
ing pleasure. (It is amusing to imagine
rhymed prose. Mohammed convinced himself that he had
what will happen if PE.TA and the Animal Liberation
been called to be a prophet in the tradition of the Jews and
Front ever get wind of this. How Muslims would deal with
of Jesus. He also convinced a small coterie of relatives and
the threat of animal-rights terrorism would be something
friends that he had tapped into a direct line to Allah. This
worth watching closely.) After killing a goat or other suitquickly led to friction with his tribe, the
able sacrificial species (for some reason,
Quraysh, who were custodians of the
dogs and pigs are deemed unsuitable),
620CE
Kaaba, which at the time was a pagan
most pilgrims then betake themselves to
Mohammed's "Night- shrine housing all the idols of economic
Medina (Yathrib), a city located 210
miles north of Mecca, in order to pray at Flight" from Mecca to significance to his tribe.
As is necessary
for foundation
what is claimed to be Mohammed's
Jerusalem
and
then
to
myths
of
virtually
all
religions,
the first
tomb. (If there are in fact human
followers
of
the
new
faith
had
to
endure
the Seventh Heaven?
remains in the tomb, it would be interpersecution,
fleeing
to
Christian
esting to see if the DNA could be
Ethiopia around the year 615. While those Muslims-in-thematched up to that of persons claiming descent from the
making were out of town, Mohammed and the disciples
prophet.) I have been unable to learn whether pilgrims face
who had stayed with him in Mecca were confined under
the tomb or Mecca when performing their Medina prayers.
siege - to be starved into submission.
Just in the nick of time, Mohammed received a revelaThe Legend of Mohammed
tion that helpfully clarified the theopolitical questions at
Although Mohammed is believed to have been born in
issue for the Meccan guardians of the gods in the Ka-aba.
the year 570 or 571 CE, it is not known what name he was
When Mohammed had reported that Allah was the only
given by his mother. Mohammed
god in town, it turned out that he hadn't
('praiseworthy' or 'highly praised') is
622 CE
received the entire satellite transmisobviously an honorific title, not a name. Hegira of Mohammed from sion. Perhaps Gabriel had mumbled and
In fact, once in the Qur'an (at 61:6) he is
Mecca to Medina?
Mohammed missed part of the message.
called 'Ahmad, which in Arabic means
Wouldn't you know? The three favorite
'more praiseworthy', and at times his Islamic era begins July 16 goddesses of Mecca - al-Lat, al-Uzzah,
contemporaries are said to have called
Muslims win the Battle
and al-Manat - were also real! This
him al-r/smin, which means 'the trustof Badr?
saved Mohammed's neck and all body
worthy one'. Despite this problem,
Jewish tribe of al-Nadhir parts attached thereto, and the exiles
Muslims believe that Mohammed - whowere able to return from Ethiopia. Later,
ever he may have been - was born in
is crushed and expelled?
when it was safe to do so, this all-imp orMecca, an Arabian city supposed to have
"The War of the Trench," tant revelation was expunged from the
been located at the intersection of major where Muslims in Medina
Qur'an and it was explained that the
caravan trade routes. Orphaned early in repulse attack from Mecca? revelation
had come from Shaitan
life, when he reached the age of twenty (Satan), not Allah. Thus began the legfive (595 CE) he married a wealthy widow named Khadija,
end of the "Satanic Verses," which more than a thousand
fifteen years his senior. According to a traditional account,
years later was to prompt the Ayatollah Khomeini to issue
Mohammed had married his boss - the merchant Khadija
a fatwa of death against the novelist Salman Rushdie.
Parsippany, New Jersey
Winter 2001-2002
Page 7
Winter 2001-2002
Page 9
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
THE CALIPHS
Orthodox Caliphs
Abu Bakr
'Umar
'Uthman
'Ali
Umayyad Caliphs
Abbasid Caliphs in
Baghdad/Iraq
Winter 2001-2002
Page 11
but this is not the case, for it was lost in the insurrection
of Mukhtar (AR. 67). The copy at Mecca remained there
till the city was stormed by Abu Sarayah (AR. 200); he
did not carry it away; but it is supposed to have been
burned in the conflagration. The Medina exemplar was
lost in the reign of terror, that is, in the days ofYazid b.
Muawiah (AR. 60-64). [Emphasis added]
Thus, by the year 835 CE, three of the four official
copies of the Qur' an had been lost. But of course, other versions of the Qur'an were intentionally destroyed:
After what we have related above, 'Uthman called in
all the former leaves and copies, and destroyed them,
threatening those who held any portion back; and so only
some scattered remains, concealed here and there, survived. Ibn Mas'ud, however, retained his exemplar in his
own hands, and it was inherited by his posterity, as it is
this day; and likewise the collection of 'Ali has descended
in his family. [Emphasis added]
Assuming, as devout Muslims do, that the Qur'an contains the very words of Allah, how can one know that the
version of the Qur'an surviving today is the correct one?
Mohammedans
are faced with the same problem
Page 12
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
has acquired the entire Koran, for how does he know that
it is all? Much of the Koran has been lost; thus let him say,
'I have acquired of it what is available'."14 He also quotes
'Aisha, the favorite wife of Mohammed as having said that
"During the time of the Prophet, the chapter of the Parties
used to be two hundred verses when read. When Uthman
And when they wrote those priceless words down on leaves and
stones and camels' bones, how reliable was their record?
in Jerusalem, executed during the reign of Abd al-Malik in
the seventy-second year of the Islamic era [691-692 CE].
Finally, some scholars have concluded that much of the
Qur'an actually predates Mohammed, being liturgical
material that was used by monotheistic Arabs, perhaps
JudCEo-Christians or the mysterious Hanifs to whom
Mohammed joined himself early in his career. Much of this
material, of course, was unintelligible to later commentators of the Qur'an who had to invent far-fetched explanations for the obscurities.
After this lengthy investigation of the origins and
transmission of the Qur'an, we can only come to the conelusion that Muslims have even less grounds for thinking
they have the genuine words of a god than do the
Christians with their epistles and gospels. In Islam as in
Christianity, a god is made to say what is expedient to support the theopolitical claims of the parties that created him
- parties that make a living selling him to hapless buyers
who have no Better Business Bureau to which they can
appeal.
Winter 2001-2002
Page 13
The Hadith
Since much of the literary evidence ultimately
is
derived from the oral traditions captured in the Hadith (or
books of traditions), it is well to begin our criticism of the
life of Mohammed by inquiring into the reliability of the
Hadith. The Hadith are alleged to be the collected records
of what Mohammed did, what he enjoined, what he did not
forbid, and what was done in his presence. They also contain the supposed sayings and deeds of the prophet's companions. Each item is traced back to Mohammed by means
of an isnad, a chain of supposedly honest witnesses and
transmitters.
The substance of such a report is called a
matn, and the total tradition of Islamic law and morals
derivable from the accredited Hadith is known as the
sunna. Adherence to the sunna for guidance in all matters
for which the Qur'an is either obscure or silent is a defining characteristic of the major Muslim sect of the world
today, the so-called Sunni. (The other major group of
Muslims, the Shi-ites, do not generally honor the sunna,
and trace their origin to a very early dispute over who
should have been the immediate successor of Mohammed,
siding with Mohammed's cousin and son-in-law -Al; and
arguing that the leadership should have remained in
Mohammed's family.)
The Hadith are especially important in post-9-1-1
America, where constant propaganda in favor of Islam is
being broadcast even as part of television news programs.
"Islam is a religion of peace," it is said. "Islam gave rights
to women," they tell us, not mentioning Sura 2:282 which
accords a woman only half the weight of a man as a witness in court. We are assured that "It is contrary to Islam
to commit suicide," and that the kamikaze terrorists were
not "true muslims." Repeatedly it is argued that the
Qur'an forbids the sort of things that the Sunni* terrorists
did to the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. While it is true
that a selective reading of the Qur'an can justify this selfserving twaddle, it is nevertheless ignoring a major source
that, with very little effort, can be manipulated to justify
the moral outrages that have been inflicted on our nation
and other parts of the civilized world. That source is, of
course, the Hadith. It was the Hadith plus the Qur'an that
justified the Taliban in their restoration of the Dark Ages.
*Most of the terrorists, especially those from Arabia, have been
members of a fundamentalist
Sunni sect known as the
Wahabis. Founded by Mohammed ibn-Abd-al-Wahab [17031791 CE] ofthe Najd region of Central Arabia, it is noted for its
rejection of all 'novelties' absorbed by Islam, rejecting music
and the wearing of silk or jewelry. Wahab rejected consensus of
opinion as a source of authority. By marriage he became allied
with the family of Saud - the ruling family of Saudi Arabia
today. Recently, an Internet news site made the unconfirmed
claim that the great majority of imams who lead American
mosques are Wahabis.
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Ji]
Winter 2001-2002
Page 15
quotations in the works of fourteen other historians writing 110 to 199 years after the Hegira. As a result, Ibn
Ishaq's Sira has to be reconstructed from the works of sixteen later historians!22 Doing so, however, is hardly worth
the effort, considering the poor reliability of the entire Sira
literature.
The Maghazi, it will be remembered, is the chronicle of
Mohammed's bandit raids and military activities. One of
the earliest authors known to have collected Maghazi legends was Wahb b. Munabbih, who was born 34 years after
the Hegira [654 CE] and lived until the year 110 AH [728
CE]. A fragment of his work has survived in the Heidelberg
Papyrus (early third/ninth
centuries) which contains
Maghazi traditions attributed to him. It is important to
note that Wahb did not know about the use of isnads - the
chains oftransmitters
used to establish the authenticity of
traditions.23 It seems likely then, that any isnads found in
scraps of early historians are not authentic but were the
creations oflater historians who wished to give the appearance that their traditions are anchored in the secure moorings of primal Mohammedanism.
Perhaps the major source for this part of Mohammed's
life is the Kitab al-Maghazi by al-Waqidi [1301747-207/822823].24 He was a Shiite and is credited with having first
established the chronology of the early years of Islam. He
made extensive use ofIbn Ishaq's work and is himself cited
extensively by the later popular historian al-Tabari [c224225/839-311/923]. Ibn Warraq sums up the historical significance - or lack thereof - ofIbn Ishaq and al-Waqidi:25
Page 16
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 17
Books,
With the disappearance of Mecca from the list of documentable facts concerning the origins of Islam and the life
of Mohammed, the character known as Mohammed of
Mecca becomes as problematic as the character Jesus of Nazareth. Despite the claims of
some Christian archaeologists otherwise of
good repute, the archaeological and literary
evidence shows that the place now known as
I'M PRAYIt.JG THAT
Nazareth did not exist as an inhabited town
YOU DON'T EAT ME,
during the first centuries BCE and CEo Without
W~AT ARE YOU
a Nazareth to come from, Jesus of Nazareth
now seems as historical as the Wizard of Oz.
PRA)'l~GFOR?
Unexpectedly and quite surprisingly,
the
debunking of the Mecca of Muslim tradition
makes it now seem likely that Mohammed of
Mecca will soon be joining Jesus of Nazareth,
the Wizard of Oz, and Peter Pan as a resident
of Never-Never Land.
REFERENCE NOTES
[1] Alphonse Mingana, "The Transmission of the
Koran," in The Origins of the Koran, edited by Ibn
Warraq, Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1998: 108. [2]
Ibn Warraq, "Introduction," in The Origins of the
Koran, 11. [3] Ibid., 13. [4] Mingana, op. cit., 98. [5]
Ibid., 99. [6] Ibid., 102. [7] Ibid., 102-103. [8] Ibid.,
104-106. [9] Ibid., 106. [10] Ibid., 107. [11] Ibid., 1Q8109. [12] Ibid., 109. [13] Ibid., 110. [14] Ibn Warraq,
Koran, 14. [15] Ibid., 15. [16] Ibid., 15. [17] Ibid., 16.
[18] Z. Sardar and Z. A. Malik, Muhammad for
Beginners, 1994, quoted by Ibn al-Rawandi, "Origins
of Islam: A Critical Look at the Sources," in The Quest
for the Historical Muhammad, edited and translated
by Ibn Warraq, Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2000:
89-90. [19] Ibn al-Rawandi, op. cit., 90. [20] Ibn
Page 18
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
A JYie.\:ragr:
/7'-0171
France
By Roger Lepeix
A speech given by Roger Lepeix, President of the French Free Thought National Federation,
on Saturday, 14 April 2001 at the 27th National Convention of
American Atheists in Orlando, Florida.
Winter 2001-2002
Page 19
During this period, great laws appeared that organized free and compulsory public education, on a secular
basis. Despite many things that have been put into question since this period, it is still a major part of our republican heritage. The decisions made by those republican representatives helped to draw the majority of our people out
of ignorance. They set the basis of a democratic organization of society and eventually achieve, in 1905, the third
separation of churches and the State, which is still
enforced today - and we are still defending it.
From the beginning, Free Thinkers have been the promoters of that fight. In those days, French Free Thought
was very powerful, and a great majority of the National
Assembly (i.e. the House of Representatives) were free
thinkers and they were leading the public campaign. A
great World Convention of Free Thought took place in 1904
in Rome (Italy), with numerous and important delegations
from all the countries, and the issue of separation was
widely debated.
The president of the parliamentary commission that
prepared the draft of the law-was Ferdinand Buisson, president of the Free Thinkers' National Association. The
report on the law was made by Aristide Briand, himself
one of the most important free thinkers. On 21 March
1905, the Free Thought Association holding a general
assembly in Paris invited the representatives to vote "a
law on separation of Churches and the State, without
delay nor interruption."
One of the major questions at the time was the following question: Do we need an Atheist or a secular republic?
Some Free Thinkers wanted an Atheist republic, but
Aristide Briand argued that an Atheist republic would not
respect freedom of conscience, and therefore would have
created different rights between citizens, according to their
opinions. To maintain equality of rights, there should not
be any official ideology or philosophy.
The 1905 law was voted under the Free Thinkers' pressure together with all the republicans. That law separates
all the churches and the State and organizes society on a
secular basis. It establishes freedom of conscience and forbids the State to recognize or give money to religions. At
the same time, it allows independent cults, out of any state
control: it is one of the major aspects of freedom of conscience.
That law goes very far in many details: it organizes the
withdrawal of church buildings to the state and the future
use of church buildings. It forbids religious signs to be
posted on public places, etc. A few examples will show you
how far secularism was to go :
Church bells can be heard but the ringing is decided by
local authorities not by priests
Public bank holidays are the same as before, but the
religious origin of some ofthem is ignored because of their
inclusion in that law.
The republicans had to make a few concessions to gain
a majority of votes in favor of the law. Thus, they accepted
that, in order to grant freedom of cult, some people could
ask for a priest in some public places if they were unable
to attend a religious meeting (e.g., persons in prisons, hospitals, army camps or boarding schools). But they had to
accept those corresponding expenditures on the budget of
Page 20
the state. That has led to many major "drifts" by succeeding governments.
That law is still enforced today, in spite of many distortions of its provisions made by the Vichy Regime during
WWII, under the Nazi Occupation. For example, all
belongings of the Roman Catholic Church, sequestered by
the separation law, were given back to the priests by a law
of February 5,1941. The Catholic Church still owns them.
The elected authorities during the Liberation in 1945, did
not re-established the law in its original form, and no government has done it since then. French Free Thought is
still campaigning for the full and whole enforcement ofthe
1905 law.
Presently, there are many attacks against the separation law, and we can only make a list of some of those
attacks:
First of all, one has to bear in mind that a part of
France was under German domination in 1905. Therefore,
the law was not enforced there. Since then, no government
has had the courage to spread the law to Alsace-Moselle
(eastern France). On the contrary, in the current framework of "regionalization," the German statutes of AlsaceMoselle, with four established religions, is the motivation
of our representatives. They want to spread it to the other
regions under appropriate forms.
The Vatican and the European
Union
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
TFiL.K
71iE.Y
a/G 13001<8UA.NING
WM~/r~OTOUTOrHRN~-ANO-~oRNeh
llOWN TMe./A. CHLJRCf4."
Winter 2001-2002
Page 21
INTRODUCTION
William B. Davis is best known as the infamous 'smoking man' in the hit television series The X-Files. His acting
career has included roles on Sliders, the Outer Limits,
THE INTERVIEW
AA: Tell us about your academic career as a philosophy
major.
DAVIS: It was a little bit accidental in a way, since when
I went to university, we didn't have
any theater programs in any university in Canada at the time, and what
there was at the University of Toronto
was a very extensive extra curricular
theater
program with a full-time
director and that's where you went if
you were interested in acting. Donald
Sutherland was there when I attended;
so there you were really to do an
extracurricular activity and you could
choose what to do academically without having to worry about "how would
I get a job?" So, I went into philosophy
for interest's sake entirely, knowing
that I was eventually going into the
theater.
After I was in philosophy for a
while, I toyed with staying in. I was in
awe of some of my classmates and
people a little farther ahead, and I
B. Davis
wondered "Do I really have the intellectual chops for this, to work at this level?" Most of the
emphasis in the department was on the history of philosophy.
AA: You're a second generation Atheist. While in college,
did you have a skeptical attitude toward the paranormal?
Was it something you thought about at the time?
DAVIS: I was always skeptical of ghosts, or aliens, or
whatever it might be.
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
AA: When you started your career and were offered a job
on The X-Files, how did you react? You must have read
some of the scripts ...
DAVIS: Well, I read one script, and the whole show from
the beginning to end was by the seat of their pants. We
often didn't know until the day before shooting what script
we were going to use. I knew from the pilot, which set out
the basic elements of the show, that it would be about the
paranormal.
AA: Did you think the show would be that enduring and
take off in the many directions which it has?
DAVIS: I didn't think for a minute The X-Files would be
successful. I've now done about 35 episodes!
AA: Within the skeptical community, one senses the attitude that many programs dealing with the paranormal and
the occult, even on a fictional basis, convey a power and
subtle message to people. Some might feel this undermines
the status of reason and skeptical thinking in the culture.
DAVIS: I had some concern about that with The X-Files,
whether participating in a show like this was substantiating or engendering belief in the paranormal. I guess I
could have said NO, I WON'T DO IT, but I don't think I was
just comforting myself when I finally decided that this
really is a fictional show and nothing more. I don't think
it's changed anyone's mind, though it may serve to reinforce certain beliefs some people may have.
The programs I think are more insidious are the pseudo-documentaries, or even a show like Psi-Factor which
imbeds and announces itself as if it were based on something. I don't think Chris Carter [producer of The X-Files]
believes in the paranormal.
I know Frank Spotznitz
doesn't; he's another executive producer. Chris Carter, on
the other hand, does believe in government conspiracy, and
I think he may be conveying that message subtly.
Winter 2001-2002
Page 23
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
probably not a good technique, right? So there are implications for acting and actor training in all of this new science.
AA: What do you think about the future of electronic
media such as the Internet, and its influence on movies
and television?
DAVIS: That's an interesting one! I read something recently
about people who describe themselves as "ex-Internet
users" now, people who have actually abandoned the
Internet. That's one of the questions that's come up with
the 'dot-com' market. Did we think too much of the
Internet, did we over-rate it as to what it would be, couldbe, will-be? It mayor may not be an integral part of our
lives. It's obviously going to serve some useful purposes,
but it's like going to a library that has no catalogue. And it's
been hijacked by economics - it's all about selling something, so if I want information and I go to the Internet, I
get it from somebody who's selling something.
AA: Is this necessarily bad?
DAVIS: It's bad if that's the only information you can get,
and it's certainly bad if you confuse it with genuine
research. So I think somehow, just as we've talked about
television, the Internet is gradually deteriorating in its
quality of 'service' as it's being turned into a commercial
enterprise.
AA: What about it being a medium for independent producers and writers, and people who want to get into media
but in the past have been excluded? Could the Internet be
a liberatory force?
DAVIS: Well, it's certainly true that you can publish things
on the Internet cheaply, so it can be a kind of vanity press.
And as a way to market your capabilities to others, it can
be quite useful. But again we're talking about it as a commercial bazaar. Yes, there will be a way to make your movie
digitally and cheaply, put it on the Internet and have some
people see it. So that has advantages in leveraging you forward in your career, but is it a big service to mankind? No,
I don't think so...
AA: What about the claim that it is a medium that governments can't control and allows dissident groups to have
a voice? Is that exaggerated?
DAVIS: No, there's some value in that, that you have
access to opinions and thinking
that is otherwise
repressed. The downside is that you have all sorts of
groups speaking out, and that means that the Internet can
smother itself. "Too much stuff," you might say. Bishop
Berkeley can have his tree chopped down and thanks to the
size of the Internet, no one will hear it!
On the other hand, the Internet does create some communities that were not easily created otherwise. People
enjoy that, and it probably has something to do with our
brain's hard wiring and tribalism and finding new units of
cohesion, and I think that's going to continue.
AM: What are your plans know that the X-Files is in its
last season?
here?
Jay
Winter 2001-2002
Page 25
Emill] Dickinson:
Pagan Sphinx
By Gary Sloan
"That no Flake of [snow] fall on you or them - is a wish that
would be a Prayer, were Emily not a Pagan."
-Letter of 1878 to Catherine Sweetser
"Knew I how to pray, to intercede for your [broken]
Foot were intuitive - but I am but a Pagan."
-Letter of 1885 to Helen Hunt Jackson
When Emily Dickinson (1830-1886)
died, she was virtually unknown to the
public. Only seven of her poems had been
published, several without permission,
and they attracted little notice. Today,
she is widely hailed as one of the greatest American poets, perhaps the greatest. Her poems are staple cargo in junior
high, high school, and college literature
courses. Never married, she lived almost
her entire life in the capacious family
home in Amherst, Massachusetts.
Her
father was an influential political figure lawyer, judge, legislator, first citizen. From
about the age of thirty on, she rarely left the house
or entertained guests. She communicated mainly by
notes and letters. She habitually dressed in white. Her
sequestered lifestyle earned her the epithet Queen Recluse.
Few people, then or now, know she was also Queen Pagan.
She died a barbed foe of Christianity.
"All men say 'What' to me," she told Thomas Wentworth
Higginson, an eminent litterateur and dutiful correspondent. The phraseology - eccentric, pixie, and oblique -is
vintage Dickinson. She meant people were baffled by her,
even though, she protested, she couldn't fathom why. Since
Higginson - now, through the fiendish vagaries of fortune,
branded a doltish mentor oblivious to her genius - would
later describe her as his "partially cracked poetess at
Amherst," she had picked a dubious confidant. Recounting
his first meeting with her twenty years before, Higginson in
a posthumous tribute wrote: "She was much too enigmatical a being for me to solve in an hour's interview." And,
perhaps, in a lifetime.
Dickinson's enigmatic nature shrouds her evolution
from Christian manque to pagan. She had histrionic
propensities that obscure the line between her true
beliefs and those she feigned. Intermittently in
her 1,775 poems and approximately 1,100
extant letters (many poems were incorporated into the letters), she struck poses and
adopted personas. "When I state myself
as the Representative of my verse," she
told Higginson, "it does not mean me but a supposed person." In early professions of impiety, she had a penchant for
hyperbole and self-dramatization that
render her claims hard to evaluate.
Later, an authentic infidel, she accommodated orthodox sensibilities. Long
after she had chucked belief in a hereafter, she continued to quote promissory
biblical verses to assure bereaved relatives
and neighbors they would be reunited with
their deceased loved ones. When she was herself bereaved, she accepted the ministrations of
clergymen. She even solicited platitudes on immortality, plucking "at a twig of evidence."
In the late 1850s, she began couching her thoughts in
a cryptic style that muffled her heterodoxy. "Tell all the
truth," she advised, "but tell it slant." Occasionally, she was
too oblique - some might say cunning - to be scrutable.
"The whole truth about Emily Dickinson will elude us
always," said Richard Sewall, her biographer. "She seems
almost willfully to have seen to that."
From an early age, the seeds of heresy lay dormant in
her. As an adolescent, she had a willful streak that bridled
under compulsion. Immensely intelligent and observant,
she kept her own counsel. "How," she marveled, "do people
live without any thoughts? How do they get the strength to
put on their clothes in the morning?" Her mother she
classed with the mindless. She never joined the family
church because she couldn't testify to any visitation of the
Holy Spirit, the ticket for membership. She stopped attending in her late twenties. At fifteen, after one of the revivals
that periodically convulsed Amherst, she wrote her friend
Abiah Root: "I was almost persuaded to be a Christian. I
thought I never again could be thoughtless and worldly.
But I soon forgot my morning prayer or else it was irksome
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 27
r-----------------------,
. Explore the American Atheists Web-site:
~
www.atheists.org
L._._._._._._._._._._._.~
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Sublime Hatred:
Nietzsche"s l\nti-6hristianity
"Almost two thousand years, and no new god!" -Nietzsche
By Jason DeBoer
s of August 25,
2001, Friedrich
Nietzsche
had
been dead for exactly one
hundred and one years.
Perhaps
the greatest
thinker
since ancient
Greece, his intellectual
legacy is still young, and
will surely last for a
thousand more years. As
we
contemplate
the
impact of Nietzschean
thought after a century, I
would like to take a brief
look at his sustained
attacks
against Christianity.
Atheism is central to Nietzsche's thought: it informs
his critique of metaphysics, his revaluation of morals and
values; his ideas on nihilism, and his views on the history
of mankind. Most famous for his refrain that "God is
dead," Nietzsche's Atheism is actually far more complex,
and is easily the most comprehensive critique of religion
ever assembled. His is not an unbiased critique: Nietzsche
burns with hatred toward Christianity, and his Atheistic
writings are extremely vitriolic.
Nietzsche
has
many
reasons
for
despising
Christianity: he feels that it emphasizes the wrong values
for mankind, preferring weakness, a herd mentality, and
false morality to strength, individual genius, and honesty.
As a religion, Nietzsche felt Christianity is inimical to
truth-seeking,
scientific inquiry, and sensuality;
it
replaced these values with blind faith, self-deception, and
Winter 2001-2002
Page 29
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
AS A CAR,PENTER,)
Works Cited
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Will to Power, ed. and trans. Walter
Kaufmann (New York: Vintage, 1968),
Nietzsche, The Anti-Christ, in The Portable Nietzsche, trans.
W. Kaufmann (New York: The Viking Press, 1954),
The Great Thoughts, ed. George Seldes (New York: Ballantine
Books, 1985).
If'ACTS
of
GoD'"?
TORNADOS, DA D.
HERE?
Winter 2001-2002
Page 31
WISE AFTER
THE EVENT
By Margaret Bhatty
missionary family. She is a free-lance journalist and author of books in English. for
Indian children. She lives in Nagpur, India.
For many years a columnist for American
Atheist, she is the author of the AAP book An
Atheist Reports From India, which is available from American Atheists ($9.00, ISBN O~
910309-42-6, Stock #5026)
Page 32
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 33
To subscribe to American
Atheist News on Line
just go to:
aanews-on
By Ibn Warraq
Stock #7011
Page 34
$25.00
@ atheists.org
l~~~~;;L~
Stock #5599
Winter 2001-2002
$14.50 USA,
$18.50 Canada
American Atheist
REVIEWS
VARDIS FISHER
An American and Atheist Novelist
on the History of Religious Ideas
PART VI
This series of articles on Vardis Fisher's TESTAMENT OF MAN is adapted from an unpublished work written in the late
1980s, titled A Journey Through History in Fiction: A Reader's Guide to History and Historical Novels. Earl Doherty
concludes his discussion of Fisher's eleven-volume work with this review of the final two novels of the TESTAMENT, which
depict the development of Christianity into the Middle Ages.
By Earl Doherty
In previous installments of this series on Vardis
Fisher's eleven-volume work of historical fiction, the TESTA
MENT OF MAN, Earl Doherty examined Fisher's tracing of the
development of religious ideas from prehistory to the beginnings of Christianity. The final two novels of the TESTAMENT
survey the full flowering within Christian civilization of
those ancient moral and mythical roots, and how they have
ultimately shaped and confined the mind and spirit of the
modern western world.
PEACELIKEA RIVER
Alan Swallow, Denver, 1957 (316 pages)
The human mind has gone down many strange byways
in its time, but few so strange as that traveled by the early
Christian ascetics who went out into the deserts to "wrestle with Satan." In this tenth novel of his TESTAMENT OF MAN,
Vardis Fisher brings us onto the dry, sun-seared sands of
Egypt, where saints like the renowned Hilarion wall themselves into doorless, windowless stone cells under the blistering heat, entombed sometimes for years in their own
sweat and waste; their only contact with the outside world
is the passage of bread and water through a narrow opening. Or like the blessed Agios, buried to the neck in the
sands for days on end, naked, without food or water or covering for his blistering scalp. Others stand for days on one
leg with heavy stones hanging from their necks; or search
out the nests of wasps and mosquitoes to subject themselves to their stings. With all manner of self-deprivation
and castigation of the flesh do these primitive monks, in
bleak solitude or in small ill-organized communities, mostly men but a few women, seek to atone for their sins and
compete to achieve the greatest feats of sanctity.
Into one such desert community comes Hareb, a gaunt,
dour, tormented man "struggling mightily against his evil
passions." He is accompanied by his meek and long-suffering wife, by Mark, an affluent merchant and occasional
ascetic, and by Helene, a woman strong-minded and with a
skeptical bent, fleeing the latest round of persecution on the
eve of the emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity.
Hareb soon declares that the childish ordeals adopted
by other monks are not for him: he will achieve holiness
and renown by challenging Satan on the very ground of his
evil power. And so he goes into the nearby city to purchase
a night with the most beautiful, the most seductive of harlots, ThaIS, whom no man, it is said, has yet been able to
spurn or resist ....
The principal impulse to early Christian asceticism
was to suppress the allurements of the world, and especially of the flesh. The attraction and love between a man and
a woman, the taste of fine foods and wine, even beauty in
nature from the song of the bird to the scent of the rose,
were looked upon as part of the domain and powers of
Satan, to be used to seduce the soul. Hareb's personal torments about the evils of the body and the diabolical nature
of women have been fueled by the obsession among many
Christian sects that sex is the greatest of sins and that
woman is the cause of this evil. Hareb quotes almost all the
prominent Church Fathers in his justification for his views.
What did Tertullian say? Woman, you are the gate to hell.
Clement had said: For Eve's deceit, the very Son of God had
to perish. Cyprian: Woman is the instrument which the Evil
One employs to possess our souls. Such views resulted in a
Winter 2001-2002
Page 35
Page 36
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 37
darker colors. For them it was an age when few but the
clergy (and by no means all of these) could read or write,
sanitation and personal cleanliness was at its nadir, protection from the whims and exploitation of the powerful, or
the tyranny of official dogma and those who wielded it, was
non-existent. Superstition reigned; poverty was crushing;
warfare, persecution and disease could decimate populations. Cruelty surpassed almost anything in ancient times.
In the average mind "Satan was Prince of the world," and
life could be summed up as "War, Famine and Plague."
Fisher, drawing on some ofthe most progressive scholars of his day, comes down firmly on the latter side, and
generally speaking the majority of historical novelists after
him have followed suit. But have any of them gotten so
thoroughly inside the superstitious mind: like that of the
woman who eats her fingernail parings and hair cuttings
because it was believed that witches could do horrible
things if they got hold of them? Or conveyed so gruesomely the filth of home and body, whether of the serf in his
hovel or the baron in his castle? This reluctance to wash
(and many of the great saints were renowned for it) was
influenced by the clerical condemnation of bathing as a
sensual indulgence, and by the philosophy of men like St.
Jerome who claimed that "if a Christian had washed in the
blood of the Lamb (i.e., Christ) he need not wash again." As
for the much-vaunted Courtly Love, has anyone so ruefully punctured its fraudulent inanities? People believed in
the efficacy of a multitude of holy relics, in a great population of malevolent demons, led by a Devil who could visit
young women and lie with them (sometimes producing in
his impish cunning and powers of impersonation a baby
who resembled the parish priest). They lived in constant
fear of the chance word or action which could label one a
heretic or lead him on the many paths to Hell. In this life
or the next, most men and women literally felt themselves
doomed. Fisher paints a numbing picture of a society
whose "devotion to God plunged it into continuous sorrow
and frantic prayers."
The struggle to throw off this cloak of darkness began
in the late eleventh century, and it was met in most quarters by a fierce resistance. All science, material advancement, cures for disease - which was regarded as just punishment by God for sin - tended to be condemned as works
of Satan. No questioning of scripture or ecclesiastical
authority could be tolerated. The Inquisition, begun in the
early thirteenth century, institutionalized this resistance.
(On this and other subjects, Fisher's appended Notes quoting his scholarly sources make for chilling reading.)
The Church's unyielding stance produced not only an
anti-clerical and anti-Roman reaction; there arose across
Europe a mix of humanist outlook and a new type of religious philosophy, divorced from Roman authority. Scholars
began to praise the humility and liberty of the intellect, the
pursuit of knowledge under God. Hillel and Richard are
convinced that "God reveals himself to those who inquire,
and those who are afraid to inquire he leaves to their folly."
In his cell, Richard dreams of a smiling Jesus who says,
"Suffer all truth-seekers to come unto me." And in keeping
with Fisher's tendency to cast Christian elements in mythically symbolic terms, Richard declares that Jesus represents all good men who come to teach and die for their
Page 38
POSTSCRIPT
After he completed My Holy Satan, Fisher went on to
revise a tetralogy of autobiographical novels which he had
written prior to the TESTAMENT and which had brought him
considerable renown. Having completed his vast investigation of history, he felt that he better understood his own
life experience in the light of the past, and by extension
that of modern society. The original four-novel opus was
trimmed to a single book, Orphans in Gethsemane; and he
concluded it with the story of the research and writing of
the TESTAMENT itself and the difficulties which the project
brought to his life. Reading Orphans after the TESTAMENT
gives one a further fascinating insight into many of the latter's ideas and their sources, as well as the workings of
Fisher's own mind.
It is a tribute to Fisher's integrity and to that of his
sources that most of the content of the TESTAMENT is as
potentially valid today as it was at the time of writing.
Some emphases have changed and certain ideas have
become more complex, but few of his theses have been
undermined and probably none discredited. In many of the
TESTAMENT'S ideas Fisher was ahead of his time. As he
faced the antagonisms and frustrations over publishing,
he consoled himself by saying that he was writing for the
long term. He may not have been far wrong. Many elements in society are still anti-intellectual
and would
rather suppress ideas than examine them. We still need
the refreshing audacity of Vardis Fisher's TESTAMENT OF
MAN and its fearless attempt to explore our heritage.
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
REVIEWS
Toe Devill'\ade
tle Do It
A Review Of
So Help Me God:
Substance Abuse, Religion and Spirituality
(Produced by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University)
By Kevin Courcey, RN
FUNDING SOURCES
As those of you who are familiar with this genre of
research might have guessed, this research was funded by
the Templeton Foundation. The Templeton Foundation's
stated goal is: "By promoting collaboration and clinical
research into the relationship between spirituality and
health and documenting the positive medical aspects of
spiritual practice, the Foundation hopes to contribute to
the reintegration of faith into modern life." Notice that the
Foundation is only interested in funding research that documents the positive medical effects of religion and spirituality. This puts significant pressure on the researchers to
"mine the data" until they can come up with positive findings.
Singled out for his contribution to this research was
David Larson, M.D., President of the International Center
for the Integration of Health and Spirituality (formerly
called the National Institute for Health Care Research).
The Templeton Foundation funds Larson's spirituality and
health research ventures at roughly $3-4 million per year.
The CASA study also frequently cites Templeton-funded
researchers Harold Koenig and Michael McCullough to bolster their claims for the positive effects of religion on
health.
The Bodman Foundation
also helped fund this
research. Like the Templeton Foundation, this group also
has a conservative, religious viewpoint, and is known for
funding religious homeless programs, school-choice/voucher research, sexual abstinence-only programs, welfare-towork reform, and faith-based solutions to drug abuse, teen
pregnancy, and youth violence. It was at the request of the
Bodman Foundation that this research was undertaken.
Winter 2001-2002
Page 39
as follows:
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
@].
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
@]
@].
~
~
Winter 2001-2002
Page 41
CONCLUSIONS
Like every Templeton-funded research project before
it, this latest report suffers from researcher bias. From the
title "So Help Me God," to the fact that "God" as an actual
entity is consistently cited as important to addicts' treatment (rather than a "belief in God") this report exhibits a
religious, rather than scientific, slant on the research. It
Page 42
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
DY~NI AN ATH!~ST~N
AMER~CA
By Chris Morton
Winter 2001-2002
Page 43
life) to accept. So let me take a small part of it for elaboration and leave the rest to your own choice.
Let us begin, then, by talking only of pre-death problems where dying takes a while. Each state in America has
different laws regarding an individual's choice of medical
treatment when that individual can no longer make clearly articulated demands. Some now accept a "Living Will"
(the idea was introduced in 1967 by Luis Kutner of the
Euthanasia
Society). Some require a medical "Proxy"
which is signed before illness overtakes one's ability to
communicate, so that someone selected by the dying person
can make decisions for him or her. Some states accept neither.
The problems of choices for dying are exacerbated by
hospitals and self-styled legal religious groups (such as the
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and
Disabled, Inc. run by James Bopp, Jr.) who believe that the
right to die is not the individual's, but must be dictated, to
the end, by a god (although they seem to think they are this
god's mouthpiece). And then, of course, there is the money.
Hospitals, hospices, doctors, nursing organizations, nursing homes, equipment renters, medical technology experts,
and drug companies all make billions of dollars a year from
keeping people alive while at the point of death (for the
horrifying details of the effect of this look at the case of
Karen Quinlan in 1976 or Carzon v Director in 1990).5
There is something wrong with a system that forces me to
put the following statement in my Living Will:
If I am in a medical facility/hospital that is supported
by a religious denomination I must be moved to an alternative secular facility immediately, regardless of my condition.It must be made clear to all medical staff dealing
with me that I do not believe in a god, therefore I do not
believe in miracles or "acts of god." It must also be made
clear to all medical staff that my non-beliefs, as they affect
my treatment, supersede their beliefs, therefore, they may
not impinge their beliefs on their choice of treatment for
me.f
And so, just prior to death when we are often physically
and mentally at our weakest and most vulnerable, Atheists
are again faced with a fight for their own freedoms; a fight
whose rules are created by theists, religious dogma, religious history, religiosity, political partisanship, the courts
and money. Choices in dying must be carefully considered
by Atheists. Can you create an environment with your supporters to exercise control over where you die, when you
die, how you die, how much you suffer when you are dying,
and how to maintain your Atheist tenets throughout the
process?
After death the Atheist's fight continues, and, if anything, it is both more concerted and dirtier because it
involves the body disposal industry. For the most part, this
is a highly organized, small group of large companies,
including four very large ones (SCI, Loewen, Stewart, and
Carriage Services) and eight smaller ones, none of whom
advertise their services openly, but work under the guise of
locally named funeral homes with locally known people even old families - running them. Their aim is not compassion and support for the bereaved, but the collection of
the highest fees possible from anguished and emotionally
vulnerable relatives. It also involves those who believe that
Page 44
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
medicine stoppage, with only painkillers to support comfort) or doctor-assisted dying, forget it.
The following things will happen, particularly
if
Atheists die where nobody knows them, away from their
home region. The local body disposal (funeral home) people
will whip the body away from the hospital morgue to their
refrigerators (remember the costs begin when they leave
their funeral parlor) before anyone can do anything - and
then, because possession is nine-tenths of the law, they will
begin their carefully rehearsed process of undermining any
alternatives but their own. They will call distraught relatives and say that they have the loved one's body for safekeeping. The relatives will agree, and in their grief they
will forget to tell the mortician not to embalm the body. The
body will be embalmed. The costs are now around $4,000.00
and rising. If the Atheist's body has been bequeathed to a
medical school, they will no longer accept it because it has
been tampered with. So the Atheist's body must now be
buried or burned.
I don't fear death at all. As a committed Atheist I have
come to terms with the end of my life as a natural, anticipated process. I think about it and talk about it as an
everyday item. Dying and death have always seemed to be
something final, simple, and very commonplace. But what I
do fear, desperately, is the way my fellow non-Atheist
humans are going to abuse me as I approach death and
after I die. Even though death is final, I feel so sad that my
wishes as an Atheist will probably not be taken into consideration. At the end of my life, my non-beliefs will be
superseded by others' beliefs because I will no longer have
a voice. Because ofthe insidious involvement of formal religions in every facet of dying and death and instead of continuing to help my species after death - as my Atheism
demands - I will be thrown away.
Atheists need to deal with these problems together; to
make it clear what their wishes are; to demand treatment
that accords with their Atheism; to fight against intrusion
by the religious; and to fight to maintain our Atheism by
donating ourselves to science. Much of what we face can be
made easier by loyal relatives and friends. Much of what
happens can be supported by clear, written demands.
Atheism, is to me, a way oflife - I and others like me should
be able to make it our way of dying and death, too. And of
course there is the Atheist's life: "As well-spent day brings
happy sleep, so life well lived brings happy death."9
REFERENCES
(1) Page 110: Design For Dying.
(2) Page 114: Design For Dying.
(3) Page 4 (Prologue) "From Your Last Breath To Your First
Spadeful"
(4) Page 144: "Design For Dying"
(5)"Tough Love", Page 131ft, "The Good Death."
(6) From my own Living Will, Page 1.
(7) "Pittsburgh Catholic Funerals" from the FAMSAWeb page:
http://vbiweb.champlain.edulfamsalpachurch.htm
(8) "Catholics Targeted" from the FAMSAweb page:
http://vbiweb.champlain.edulfamsalcatholic.htm
(9) Michael Angelo.
See Further Reading page 52
Winter 2001-2002
Page 45
Was ~quare
By Francis Seth Dudley
'
'Y
-s-,
~i1
Page 46
advantage of this is that very rarely is anyone -misunderstood, for their exact thought is transmitted into the surrounding water. The problem with this mode of communication is, that you could find yourself being eavesdropped
upon, when you did not intend for anyone else to hear what
you said. Compounding this, there is no difference between
speaking a thought, and having the thought. The smell goes
into the water just the same. Very often, fish listen to other
fish as they think, so even one's thoughts are not one's own.
There is not much privacy in the underwater world.
"I don't knows what to make of 'em eeda, you. AIls I
know is all night, I hears you dreamin, and all night I sits
in my shell, and grinds my claws togedda. r::kbows we's
friends'nall, but a crab's gotta sleep. Coupla times, I almost
felt like just jumpin offa da edge uh da world!" Said Scaum
unsympathetically,
his antennae stiffiy erect. ~'Ya knows
what I'd do if I wuz you? Well I asks myself- who's the
smartest creatures in da woild? If I had a problem I couldn't figger out, I'd go see da Ladies. Dey'll tell ya what fer."
Tesh considered this. The Ladies - it was difficult
enough to even get close enough to them to speak, and if
you did get close enough, well, Tesh had quite ,u.ew friends
who disappeared mysteriously while swimming near, them.
The idea of going to see them intentionally had ;nJvet 6' en
done before. With limited options, Tesh thanked 'his friend,
and began to swim towards the other si~tht!
world.
Then it was day.
Tesh decided to take the route
a,
lQ}:'Le.d~t e edge of
the world. Looking over its edge always gave him a strange
feeling, like there was so much he didn't know about., that
maybe this world he knew, wasn't the only world. Like he
was part of something that was so much bigger, but he was
just too minute and insignificant to understand.
These
thoughts came to him as he swam, and he looked ar~nd
himself nervously. If the other fish heard those thoughts he'd be lucky to keep his fins. AI tlte other fish in the world
were steadfast in theF'n.Otion that this world was the only
world, and that was just the way it was. Qnce, he asked a
group of them, who ere schooling e statiCally: in ci~cles,
staring blankly, all thinkihg-tneir-one-(world
houghts, what
proof they had that there was no other world? His answer
s
e ritt
II their little mouths almost simultao
't- er
~e lost a piece of his left pectoral fin
hat a J was
lis son wel ..-earned:;l2o
ot Question."
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Still swimming slowly, he peered over the edge and concentrated on the funny shapes he saw off the edge of the world.
Sometimes the shapes moved. They were moving now.
At that moment, Tesh felt the water above him vibrating. Glancing up, he saw that some other fish were eating
the food that fell from the sky. They jumped and clamored,
all greedily trying to get more than the other fish did. Once
a day, brightly colored flakes fell from above. Where they
came from, the fish did not care. They considered it to be
part of the world, the way it is. This was also not to be questioned. Tesh swam on, ignoring them. He had business to
attend to.
He began to hear the distant thrum of the Ladies. Most
fish didn't go to this side of the world, because of this
monotonous low drone. When you first heard it on the
periphery of their area, it smelled sweet and enticing. The
closer you got to them, the louder the smell got. It made you
dizzy after a while, and had the effect of drawing you closer, partly out of gnawing hunger, partly out of disorientation. Tesh did not know what might happen to him. He only
hoped he would find relief from his troublesome dreams. He
had nowhere else to turn.
The water seemed denser on this side of the world, and
Tesh began to find it more difficult to breathe. He could see
the Ladies now. They were so beautiful - pink and purple
and peach-colored - waving and swaying like thick long
hair in the liquid breeze, anchored to a large outcropping of
rock. Now he could hear what they were saying - what the
source of the thrum was that could be heard so far away.
They waved enticingly, sounding like a thousand thousand
beautiful voices, "comecomecome... closiosioserrrrrrr
.
dondonnntttt ... beeee ... affffraaaaidd ... weeeee
arrree .
ffforrr ... yooou
yooou ... aarree
fffoorrrr
ussssss .
comecomecome closlosloseerrrrr
" These sounds repeated maddeningly, growing in intensity as Tesh approached.
He could see little orange fish diving in and out of them,
laughing and giggling as ifthey had not a care in the world.
Tesh inched closer to the Ladies - instinctively knowing to
touch them would be death. These orange fish may be
immune and happy, but he was not.
"I have come to ask a question of you!!", Tesh said loudly. Glancing at the ground, he noticed that it was covered
with small bones being picked at by tiny shrimp. The
orange fish continued to dive and laugh in the midst of this
graveyard.
The sound of their voices drowned out all thought,
replacing it with their own. He mentally braced himself
against their menacing onslaught of thought.
"Iiiiiiiiitttt ... sssspppeeeakkkkssss ... tttooo
ussssss .
sssiisssteeerrssss ... wwhhhaaattt ... ddoooeesss
iiitttt .
sssaaayyyy?"
"Wise Ladies, tell me why I have these dreams?!!" he
thought, adding the smell of his dream to this, so they
might understand. Each moment near the Ladies was torturous. It was like having your favorite food dangled in
front of you, and wanting it, even though you know it is poisoned. Moments eked by, and the ladies tentacles seemed to
twitch thoughtfully, in contrast to their usual seductive
waving undulations. They then replied, in their smoothly
seductive voice, "Tttooo ... nniiightttt ... yyyooouu ... wwwwiillllll ssseeeee aaaa ... ffffrriieeenddd...
lllooonnngggg ...
Parsippany, New Jersey
gggoooonnneee...
wwweeee...
wwwiiilllll...
aaalllloooowww
ttthhhiiisssss ... ttthhheee ... wwwooorrrlllddd ... iiissss
nnnooottt ... sssqquuaaaarrreeee ... aaasss ...
tthhheeeeyyy ... ttthhhhhiinnkkkk ... "
Tesh fought to retain these thoughts, over the dull
cacophonous roar of the Ladies' response.
"Friends ... coming ... back World ... not ... square ... "
He found himself struggling backwards - away from
the Ladies. It was probably the hardest thing Tesh ever did,
to leave that which was so enticing. The sweetness and
death the Ladies promised almost made his life feel anticlimactic, in retrospect. He swam away, using the last remnants of his energy. Outside their influence, he rested by a
plant, breathing heavily.
Then it was night.
Tesh decided to sleep for a while, under this plant. He
had never been more tired. Seeing the Ladies was a strain
both physically and mentally. He picked a leaf that provided the most cover, and swam underneath. Almost immediately, he began to sleep.
It was some time after this, that he felt foreign
thoughts encroaching on his area. Peeking out from under
the leaf, he saw a dark shape gliding towards his leafy sanctuary. As it approached, he smelled death and decay. It
reminded him of Scaum's cave, where he brought the carrion he found on the bottom to eat. Yet at the same time, the
smell was strangely familiar. He saw that what the Ladies
had said was true, for this was his old friend Tolpa.
However, it was he, and it was not, for this fish was not
whole. Large chunks of his body were missing, and bones
protruded from it at awkward angles. As he approached,
Tesh saw that where the eyes should be, there were only
empty sockets, with pink and gray tattered flesh visible
inside.
"Tolpa, are you sent from the Ladies? What happened
to you? Please, come no closer, I can hear you from there,"
said Tesh, backing away slightly from this semblance.
"Ahhhh old friend, yes, the Ladies have allowed me to
see you. My fate awaits you also, if you continue in the
direction you are going. I too, went to see the Ladies. I was
maddened as are you, in looking off the edge of the world. I
saw shapes moving beyond the barrier -lights that moved,
and once I saw what looked like two huge eyes, examining
me with an odd sort of intelligence, as I looked at them. As
Tolpa relayed his tale, Tesh's eyes wandered over Tolpa's
body, noticing small creatures inside his body cavity, snacking on him as he spoke. "I went to the Ladies, and asked
them these things.", he continued. "They sent my Father to
see me in my sleep that night, much as I am seeing you now.
What he showed me, I will now show you, if you wish. What
you do with this knowledge is your concern. I caution you
though, you will never be content in this world again, if you
choose to come."
Tesh swished his fins in thought over this, and replied,
"Friend, I am not content. Something is wrong with this
world. I know there is more to it, though I cannot imagine
what it is. I have seen these shapes moving in the ether,
beyond the edge of the world. I wonder how it is that food
simply drops from the sky. I wonder why night and day both
come at an instant. I wonder until my brain aches.
Everyone else is so content and accepting. They eat and
Winter 2001-2002
Page 47
chatter and swim with their dull stares and gaping mouths,
and never inquire. No, my friend, I am not content, and
believe I never will be, until I have these questions
answered. Show me what you will."
With that, Tolpa told Tesh to follow him, and to not be
afraid. They swam up to the surface. Oddly, upon reaching
the surface, they continued up into the air. Tesh looked
around himself wildly as he followed Tolpa. They were in a
square room, high above the world. He now saw his "world"
for what it was. It was square, and very small. He saw living things moving around this room on long things that
protruded from their bodies. One of the creatures was
pressed up against the edge of his world, looking into it
interestedly. The thing reached into a container, and
dropped flakes onto the surface. He saw oblivious little fish
grabbing at the flakes. His world was an enclosure. A cage!
Tolpa gestured with a fin to Tesh, to follow him further.
They swam up, through the ceiling of this room, up into the
air. High above, they stopped again. Tesh saw that the
square room he was in, was part of a bigger square. "A cage
inside a cage," he thought. All around this quadrangle were
green plants - and more of the odd creatures moving
around, reminding him very much of the fish he saw jumping at food flakes moments before. Tesh looked up, and
caught his breath. He saw above, the most beautiful color
blue he had ever seen. It looked like water, but clear and
clean. In the center of all this blue, was a bright light. He
couldn't look straight at it, but it was warm and soothing.
"To think I thought I had seen the sky before," Tesh
thought. Tolpa and Tesh continued to ascend towards the
real sun. The bigger square grew smaller, and Tesh saw
that it was surrounded by many other squares, all getting
very small as they rose. The beautiful blue began to change
to limitless black, and had millions of small points of light
in it. Tolpa arced with a fin overhead to the little points of
light. "Stars," he said. Tesh looked down and he saw that
they were over an impossibly huge spherical shape. He saw
blues, and greens, and browns. Above him still was the
great light. It then occurred to Tesh what his life had been
up to this point, as he watched the real world slowly spin
below them. He lived in a cage, inside another cage, inside
one big round cage.
Tesh turned to look at his friend, and found him vacantly looking back at him. "Now you see," said Tolpa. "This life
you live is hollow, when you see it for what it really is. You
are only a very small fish. I am sorry, my friend. But now
that you know, I wonder how it will be with you. Will you
ever be content to live in that minuscule square again? I
was not, which is why I am as you see me. I only hope for
your sake, you find some sort of equilibrium. I can help you
no further. My last word of guidance is this: You are not the
same fish you were when you fell asleep tonight.
Remember, all the fish you knew before are still the same.
Be content in the knowledge that you are part of something
they have no concept of. Farewell, Tesh. Now, close your
eyes."
Tesh glanced at his friend, then looked down at the
world in awe one last time, before closing his eyes. When he
opened them next, he was back in the room, in the tiny fish
tank, under the little synthetic leaf. He had much to think
about.
Page 48
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 49
even if exposed, they will find reasons and excuses for their
belief, and defend it. What needs to be done is to divorce
the believer from the belief Refer to third-person examples,
or hypothetical situations, to allow the individual to
address the issue without feeling pressured to be "right" or
"wrong." If you want someone to act intelligently, treat
them as though they are intelligent and capable of making
reasonable judgments and logical conclusions.
When I began my graduate work in mathematics, I
became friends with a Ph.D. candidate in the math department. He was very intelligent, as one might expect from a
math Ph.D., was a great chess player, and fan of Star Trek.
We had many interesting discussions on a variety of topics.
However, I was much surprised at the time that he was a
fundamentalist
Christian. Now, I understand how this
seeming paradox can be. Mathematics at the level of our
study is well past simple number-crunching, and delves
into the abstract ideas behind the numbers. It is also totally the realm of logical proofs and critical reasoning. But,
this is actually quite consistent with a belief in a god, since
that is the ultimate abstraction. Many of the great minds
of the past, and especially mathematicians,
including
Descartes and Newton, were also theologians, who believed
that through the study of mathematics they were "reading
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
Winter 2001-2002
Page 51
IN MEMORIAM
Atheists in Alabama and American Atheists across
the country sadly mourn the loss of Roverta Sullivan
Ellis, who died on Thursday, October 18, 2001. As a final
act of love, her body was been donated to the UAB
Anatomical Donor Program. A memorial service was held
on Sunday, October 28, at 3:00 p.m. at the Unitarian
Universalist Church in Huntsville. Ro was always active
in the community and was an avid contributor of editorialletters to the editor of The Huntsville Times on behalf
of Atheism and rationality
in general. A long-time
American Atheist activist, Ro sparred frequently in the
editorial section with religionists.
She volunteered
as
historian
for Habitat
for Humanity,
worked at the
Friends of the Library bookstore, organized bridge tournaments for charity, and wrote plays. Her passionate
spirit will always be with us, and her work lives on.
Page 52
Winter 2001-2002
American Atheist
-AIlIericaIIAIIIem---""',"" ..,
An Atheist Reports
From India
r-;:::========::::;-]
by Margaret Bhatty
--Margan:l
R Bfli'ltty----
r-------~
272 pages,paperback
ISBN 0-910309-42-6
$9.00
L.::=========:::...J
ISBN 1-57884-908-X
$12.00
CHRIS11A.NITY
an ATHEIST
PRIMER
An Atheist Primer
by Madalyn O'Hair.
Be.fore.
CHRIST
by John G. Jackson.
A historical survey of the components of Christianity, showing that
they existed before that religion was
invented. An excellent starter book
on the historicity of Jesus Christ.
Illustrations.
Index.
237
pp.
by John G. Jackson
Paperback.
ISBN 0-910309-20-5
Stock #4504
$30.00
Stock #5583
S
-I
THEGREAT
$14.00
Stock #5200
Christianity
Before Christ
NFIDE[
$16.00
76 pages, paperback
Stock #5197
ISBN 0-910309-08-6
$7.00
By Ibn Warraq
Cha'_'ngthe_
01an hlMorlc*
Stock #5599
tenets of Islam."
ISBN: 0-87975-984-4
Stock #7011
Religious Schools v.
Children's Rights
THE ATHEIST'S
by James G. Dwyer
~.~
V.
Children's Rights
lANES'
DWYlR
ISBN 0-8014-3426-2
Stock #5591
$29.95
8,. Christopher
M. o"W
Stock #5592
by Philip A. Stahl
Materialism
is minimalist
by
definition. Focusing on manifestations of matter, fields, and
energy, it excludes distracting
and unverified entities such as
spirits and souls.
Professional Press. xxiv + 250 pp. Paperback.
ISBN 1-57087-539-1
$15.00
M. Drew
SIXTY-FIVE PRESS
INTERVIEWS
ROBERT G. INGERSOLL
wrm
wn4Tntl!c..uT~'lOUI
MJM~ln"'V'J'PDt
IlEPOItTDS
DtlJUNG
AOV....-n;a~IIl'OFPVNJC
~A$ABDmIlfrfg:z
M"J)t:).Dn'OF~
$8.00
Stock #4600
to Modern Materialism
Stock #7001
Window Sticker
American Atheists
www.atheists.org
HANDBOOK
$1.00
IrtlrodactionIJyM..:blyrIM..,...yO'llal
SIXTY-FIVE PRESS
INTERVIEWS WITH
ROBERTG.
INGERSOLL
What the Great Agnostic Told
Numerous Newspaper Reporters During a Quarter-Century
of Public Appearances as a
Freethinker
and Enemy of
Superstition.
Introduction
by
Madalyn
Murray O'Hair
Collected from over two dozen newspapers, Ingersoll comments on freethought, the Bible, heaven and hell, miracles,
church creeds, missionaries, Sunday blue laws, prohibition,
anarchism, aging, and even theater, music, literature, and
summer vacations.
xvi + 262 pages. Paperback
ISBN 1-57884-910-1
Stock # 5589
$15.00