Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
November 2014
We like to thank all those who contributed essential data to this report:
Austria - Zivilcourage & Antirassismus Arbeit (ZARA), United Kingdom - The
Community Security Trust (CST), Belgium - The Inter-federal Centre for Equal
Opportunities and Opposition to Racism, Ligue Belge Contre lAntismitisme, Czech
Republic - The Jewish Community Prague, France LICRA & Service de protection de la
Communaut Juive (SPCJ), Germany - The Amadeo Antonio Foundation, Germany The Association for a Democratic Culture in Berlin, Germany - Jugendschutz.NET,
Hungary - The Action and Protection Foundation, Italy - The Observatory on
Antisemitism of the Jewish Contemporary Documentation Center, The Netherlands Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on the Internet (MDI), The Netherlands - Center
for Information and Documentation Israel (CIDI), Sweden The Jewish Community
Stockholm and the Jewish Community Malm, Austria - Forum Gegen Antisemitismus
Vienna.
Other sources used:
JTA, Magenta Antisemitism News (CASW), ICARE Hate Crime News, Reuters, the
Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR), the Algemeiner and the ADL report
VIOLENCE AND VITRIOL - Antisemitism around the World during Israels Operation
Protective Edge, July - August 2014
We like to thank the Ministry of Aliyah and Immigrant Absorption (Israel) for use of
their Aliyah statistics over 2013 and 2014.
Special thanks go to both Carole Nuriel from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Israel,
and Ido Daniel from Israeli Students Combating Antisemitism (ISCA), for digging-out the
Aliyah statistics, and to Mike Whine and Mark Gardner (CST, United Kingdom) for
persistently hounding some respondents for data!
Philippe Schmidt, Chair of INACH and vice-president (International Affairs) of LICRA
Ronald Eissens, co-director of Magenta Foundation, board member of INACH
November 6, 2014
Table of Contents
Introduction & Summary....................................................................................... 6
Country Reports.................................................................................................... 8
Austria ................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Belgium ................................................................................................................................................................. 9
Czech Republic................................................................................................................................................... 9
France..................................................................................................................................................................10
Germany .............................................................................................................................................................10
Hungary ..............................................................................................................................................................11
Italy.......................................................................................................................................................................12
Netherlands.......................................................................................................................................................12
Sweden................................................................................................................................................................13
United Kingdom...............................................................................................................................................13
Impact .................................................................................................................14
Conclusions..........................................................................................................15
Recommendations by respondents ......................................................................15
Annex I -Aliyah statistics 2013 and 2014 ...............................................................16
ANNEX II ISCA Activity summary 2014 on handled cases of Antisemitism
and Holocaust Denial. ..........................................................................................19
Annex III - Internet research - antisemitism on Twitter in English, French
and Dutch ............................................................................................................19
Dutch language ................................................................................................................................................19
English language .............................................................................................................................................20
French language ..............................................................................................................................................21
Additionally, we asked for examples of incidents, the perceived impact of antiSemitic incidents on the Jewish community and for possible recommendations for
the Berlin conference.
Where relevant and necessary, we made use of data from the ICARE Hate Crime
News Database, the Magenta Antisemitism Newsletter (CASW) and several online
There are great differences in the number of incidents reported by the different
NGOs and Jewish Communities across Europe. As we know, this is not necessarily
because there are more incidents taking place in one country. The figures have to
be taken with caution. There are many factors that can explain these
discrepancies. The availability of data depends greatly on the ability and
willingness of victims to report incidents. Reporting needs an environment that is
favorable, including a general public awareness and understanding about
antisemitism in general, and in particular about the fact that antisemitic incidents
are not acceptable. Reporting depends first and foremost on the victims
themselves who will feel encouraged to do so, because they expect the
authorities to respond adequately. And this again is very often the result of daily
outreach and support work of civil society groups and Jewish communities. Some
of those organizations have been monitoring and recording antisemitic incidents
for quite some time and have the resources to reach out to potential victims, they
enjoy the trust of communities, and have the ability to process the information.
Some organizations have started recording and reporting antisemitic incidents on
top of everything else they do, without dedicated resources, because the impact of
a single incident on the victims is so devastating. Generally, it can be safely
assumed that the figures that are represented in this report do not reflect the
reality of the situation faced by Jewish communities in the ten countries that
provided information. These figures represent only the tip of the iceberg. They are
a pointer. For authorities, civil society, and the media to act upon, to improve the
quality of the picture we can get about this issue.
All organizations report that the number of incidents that were recorded after the
start of the Israel-Gaza conflict is disproportionately high, compared to figures
recorded during the first half of the year. The number of incidents recorded during
and immediately after the Israel-Gaza conflict was at least as high as the number
of incidents reported during the first half of the year (Belgium, France, Germany,
and the United Kingdom) and sometimes twice as high (Austria, Czech Republic,
Italy). Respondents reported as well that incidents reported during the IsraelGaza conflict were more often of a violent nature as during the preceding
reporting period, including in particular assaults and attacks at persons, or arson
attacks on buildings associated with the Jewish community.
The figures on incidents on the Internet follow this trend. There have been
disproportionately high numbers of expressions of antisemitism observed and
recorded by those that contributed to this report. It seems as well that during the
months of July and August expressions of antisemitism in the social media were
also more frequent compared to the total number of antisemitic expressions on
7
the Internet. The Twitter-research that looked at expressions in the English, Dutch
and French languages confirms this, and so does the reporting of the Dutch MDI
which noted more online antisemitism during the Israel-Gaza conflict than during
the whole of its 17-year existence. The activity report by the Israeli Students
Combating Antisemitism (ISCA), which shows an increase of hundreds of
antisemitic expressions on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube from July 2014 on,
further indicates that the problem is huge. (See Annex II).
Country Reports
Austria
The Forum against Antisemitism does not monitor the Internet but reported that
14 antisemitic expressions on the Internet (including nine expressions inciting to
violence on social media) were reported during the first half of the year, while 59
antisemitic expressions (including 21 expressions inciting to violence) were
reported during the Israel-Gaza conflict.
As an example of antisemitic statements to be found on social media, the Forum
reported following post on a Facebook page All Jews are equal animals. I will
participate and burn their flag and nobody can stop me.
Belgium
The Inter-federal Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism
reported 37 incidents for the period covering January-August 2014, more than
half of which (20) took place between 7 July and 31 August. The Centre reported
that 32 of those incidents were targeting persons, 12 of which were recorded
during and after the conflict in Gaza. It is noticeable that 7 out of 12 of the
antisemitic incidents targeting persons were of violent nature. One incident
targeting Jewish property was recorded between January and July, while one
incident of arson on a synagogue was reported during the conflict in Gaza.
The Centre reported 25 expressions of antisemitism, including 18 inciting to
violence, from January to July 2014 and 14 expressions of antisemitism during and
after the conflict in Gaza, including six inciting to violence. Of those 39 expressions
of antisemitism, 21 were identified on social media.
Among the incidents recorded by the Centre, the arson of a synagogue in
Anderlecht (Brussels) received important media coverage. On the occasion of the
European Day of Jewish Culture on 14 September, projectiles were thrown at a
group of visitors to the National Memorial to the Jews Martyrs in Anderlecht
(Brussels). A 75year old woman was physically and verbally abused by a man in
the city hall of Ixelles (Brussels).
Slaughter the Jews was chanted at a July 12 demonstration in Antwerp and
Death to Jews! at a July 19 demonstration in Brussels. 1
The Belgian League against Antisemitism reported that on 23 July in a small city
in the vicinity of Lieges a poster with following words was placed at the entrance
of a caf Dogs allowed but Zionists are banned in French and Dogs allowed but
Jews are banned in Turkish.
Czech Republic
The Jewish Community Prague recorded 15 incidents from January to June and
twice as many (30) during July and August. During the first half of the year, in one
instance a synagogue was targeted while in two other instances other Jewish
property were. During the summer months, two incidents targeted synagogues
and three incidents targeted other Jewish property. While there was no incident
reported targeting persons during the first half of the year, there were four
incidents targeting persons, one of them including physical violence, recorded in
July and August.
1 VIOLENCE AND VITRIOL - Antisemitism Around the World During Israels Operation Protective Edge,
France
LICRA reported 109 incidents during the first half of the year and 22 incidents in
the months of July and August. In total 107 incidents targeted persons during the
whole period, 12 of them were of violent nature. One incident on a synagogue and
five incidents on other Jewish property were reported to LICRA.
Antisemitic expressions on the Internet amounted to 147 during the reporting
period, 30 of them were recorded in July and August. Most of these expressions
(77 from January to June and 18 in July and August) were observed in the social
media.
Germany
The Amadeo Antonio Foundation reported 55 incidents for the first half of 2014
and 86 for the months of July and August 2014. These included 34 incidents
targeting persons, 19 of which took place during July-August 2014. The number
of incidents targeting persons involving physical violence amounted to 6 during
the first half of the year and 11 during the summer months. There were nine
incidents recorded targeting property (two targeting synagogues, one
community center, and six aimed at other Jewish property) from January to June;
there were 15 incidents recorded targeting property in July and August (nine
targeting synagogues, one a community center and five other Jewish property).
The only two incidents involving an arson attack took place during the summer
months, one being an attempted firebombing in which petrol bombs were
thrown at a synagogue in the western town of Wuppertal by three suspects, the
other an attack on the building of the Jewish Community Center in West Berlin.
because of the conflict with Gaza, and seven were assaults or physical attacks. One
attack was directed at a synagogue, and two at Jewish property.
Hungary
The Action and Protection Foundation reported eleven incidents during the
period covering January-August 2014, one of those was directed at a person and
two at Jewish property.
11
Italy
The Observatory on Antisemitism of the Jewish Contemporary Documentation
Center reported 70 incidents between January and August 2014, of which 21 took
place after the Israel-Gaza conflict started. Five incidents were directed at persons,
five at a synagogue and 11 at a community center or other Jewish property. The
Observatory reported that there were no incidents of violent nature recorded
after the Israel-Gaza conflict started and that the recorded incidents did not target
any persons.
The Observatory reported ten episodes of antisemitism on the Internet during the
reporting period; four of them took place after the beginning of the Israel-Gaza
conflict. The Observatory noted that they record only incidents that are either
referred to them or reported in the mass media. There were in total 12
expressions of violence, half of which were reported after the beginning of the
Gaza conflict.
Netherlands
12
Sweden
After the start of the Gaza conflict and until the end of August, the Jewish
Community in Malm recorded eight incidents targeting property (one attack at
the synagogue, five targeting the community center and the rest aimed at other
identifiable Jewish property). The Jewish community in Stockholm reported
increased levels of anti-Semitism, including eleven incidents targeting persons
(two of which were classified as violent), one attack at the synagogue, six attacks
at the community center and three other incidents aimed at Jewish property.
Among noticeable incidents, the Jewish Community of Malm reported that the
Rabbi was harassed on his way from and to the synagogue on Shabbat and that the
windows of the synagogue were smashed at several occasions. They also reported
that members of the Jewish community were the victims of verbal abuse after
confronting some persons walking by on the street making anti-Semitic
statements. The Jewish Community of Stockholm reported that they received two
serious threats (with mention of suicide bombing in one case and car bomb in the
second case) during the reporting period. The Jewish Community also reported
that representatives of the community who usually participate in the annual gay
pride in Stockholm were the targets of verbal abuse during the event.
United Kingdom
The Community Security Trust (CST) reported more than 600 antisemitic
incidents from January to the end of July 2014, half of which were recorded during
the month of July. Three hundred and four (304) incidents were reported by the
CST for the period January-June, including 22 incidents of violent nature targeting
persons. In this period there were six attacks at synagogues, and 27 attacks at
other Jewish property. During the month of July, CST reported 302 incidents,
including 21 incidents of violent nature targeting persons, 22 attacks at
synagogues and 12 at other Jewish property.
13
From January until the end of July 2014, CST recorded 140 antisemitic incidents
on social media, 54% of which were recorded during July only. CST does not
record static antisemitic websites as antisemitic incidents.
Among noticeable incidents, CST reported that the wall of the Hove Hebrew
Congregation synagogue was spray-painted above the windows with the text
Free Gaza and that during many demonstrations posters were put up equating
Israel to Auschwitz. A further incident involved two men entering the London
kosher restaurant White House Express while one of them shouted Heil Hitler
and did a Nazi salute.
Two supermarket chains were targeted for stocking Israeli food. In Birmingham
up to 100 demonstrators ran amok in a Tesco store throwing around stock and
some attacked police officers in apparent protest against its selling of Israeli
food. In London a Sainsbury's store removed its kosher food from display after
fearing that anti-Israeli protesters would attack it. It was later put back on the
shelves.3
Impact
Some reported (Netherlands, France) that they envisaged for the first time (or for
the first time in years) emigrating, to Israel or to another country. Especially the
elder reported being nervous and scared. Some publicly stated that they did not
feel at home anymore. (Netherlands).
JPR European Jewish Digest, August 2014.
http://www.jpr.org.uk/documents/European_Jewish_Digest_August_2014.pdf
3
14
Most Jewish communities mentioned that some members declared they were
considering leaving the country. According to the same respondents, this issue had
not been a topic of discussion in a long time and was perceived both as a
consequence of the climate of fear generated by antisemitic acts and a source of
concern for Jewish communities. We have annexed the statistics provided by the
Ministry in Israel that keeps a record of the people who decide to do Aliyah.
Although these figures have to be considered with caution, it appears that
comparable numbers of people made Aliyah during the first six months of the year
and during the two months of the Israel-Gaza conflict and its immediate aftermath.
Conclusions
All respondents report a rise in antisemitic incidents, both on Internet and in the
physical world after the start of the Israel-Gaza conflict. Monitoring, research,
complaints and case handling by INACH, MDI and ISCA, the ICARE Hate Crime
News and the Magenta Antisemitism News all confirm this. The level of violence
is also up, including in particular assaults and attacks against persons, or arson
attacks on buildings associated with Jewish communities.
Another observation that can be drawn from the antisemitic expressions that
were reported after the start of the Israel-Gaza conflict (on the Internet and in
real life) is the increasingly blurred separation line between legitimate criticism
of Israel and anti-Semitism, in particular on social media. Jew, Zionist or
Zionazi were often used interchangeably on social media. To quote a recent
Facebook posting: That you are a Jew is already pretty bad, but you are also a
Zionist that is doubly unacceptable.
We recommend this booklet to all those who work on the problem of
antisemitism in Europe and to the participants of the 10th Anniversary of the
OSCEs Berlin Declaration on Anti-Semitism High-Level Commemorative Event
and Civil Society forum on November 12 and 13, 2014 in Berlin.
Recommendations by respondents
1. Put more focus on preventive work especially in the field of youth (e.g.
through workshops etc.) - ZARA, Austria.
2. Limit the freedom of U. S. based hateful fora, persuade governments to
campaign against antisemitism the way Angela Merkel did - Jewish
community Prague.
3. OSCE Participating states should fully adopt and enact the 2005 EUMC
Working Definition of Anti-Semitism. Police and public institutions should
also use it to register cases of antisemitism. - Verein fr demokratische
Kultur in Berlin e.V. & Ligue Belge contre l'Antismitisme.
4. Make sure that social media content, with violent or graphic images is not
intended to justify or glorify violence and is not exploited to generate hate
against certain groups of society. Jugendschutz.Net in Germany, as
15
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Belgium
Hungary
Germany
Netherlands
Austria
Sweden
Czech Republic
www.jugendschutz.net
16
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Belgium
Hungary
Germany
Netherlands
Austria
Sweden
Czech Republic
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Belgium
Hungary
Germany
Netherlands
Austria
Sweden
Czech Republic
France September
Total
5063
384
August
July
June
748
1371
546
May
April
March
413
333
471
February January
428
369
17
United September
Kingdom
Total
479
37
August
109
May
April
March
24
41
47
Italy September
Total
239
22
June
99
44
February January
33
45
August
July
June
51
47
22
May
April
March
12
13
21
Belgium September
Total
167
10
July
February January
August
34
May
April
March
15
14
18
27
24
July
June
25
17
February January
16
18
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Belgium
Hungary
Germany
Netherlands
Austria
Sweden
Czech Republic
18
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
March
April May
June
July
Aug. Sept.
Sum
Facebook 279
473
454
428
440
479
502
559
525
682
567
5388
Instagram 53
89
195
339
316
198
231
205
189
236
258
2309
Wikipedia 54
129
110
131
144
160
168
145
136
117
180
1474
Yahoo
Answers
44
62
79
91
88
72
77
84
139
103
124
963
YouTube
414
378
366
380
363
577
565
843
581
571
519
5557
The Dutch Internet expression kk Joden (literally cunt cancer Jews) was used in
tweets 307 times while the more popular expression kankerjoden (cancer Jews)
was used 534 times. Joden aan het gas (Jews to the gas) was only used 268
times and Hamas Hamas Joden aan het gas (Hamas Hamas Jews to the gas) 167
times.
Most popular were tweets that contained Joden dood (Kill the Jews), 759 times.
Examples of expressions on Twitter
(translated from Dutch)
kk Jews
Did Jews not learn from history
I hope that once in my life I 'm going to kill some Jews Fucking shit Jews
#Free Palestine
All those fucking Jews can die , and I prefer to kill them #FREE PALESTINE
Now we know why Hitler gave the jews a shower #FREE PALESTINE we need a
new Hitler
#Free Palestine fuck the Jews ! Destroy the #Jews!
Fucking shit all the Jews dead #Free Palestine
Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas ! #Free Palestine
Fucking shit Jews Kill those dirty Jews Hitler has done nothing wrong
@Kevitatjuuh_x : @ _goldmocro_ Hitler must come back again to kill those jews
#Free Palestine
English language
The INACH Secretariat did research into the use of negative expressions about
Jews during the Israel-Gaza conflict which were a direct reaction to the conflict,
using the English-language section of Twitter.
The hashtag #hitlerwasright was used more than 10,000 times and became a socalled trending topic. The hashtag #hitlerdidnothingwrong was used nearly 3700
times. Both hashtags were used only in connection with the conflict with Gaza.
Other popular hashtags used in antisemitic tweets were #KillTheJews,
#freepalestine, #freegaza, #ZioNazis, #Nazisrael, #Gazaundersiege,
#Ethniccleansing. #Nazionism, #Blitzkrieg, #IsraHell and #Gaza.
Examples of expressions on Twitter
Fukin dirty Jews in Edmonton acting like they no what the other dirty Jews are
doing in gaza is right #dirtyjews #freegaza #corruptedworld
@ADNAN_AMAR Hitler was a good man bro,it's a shame he never finished of the
job he started.#gasemall
French language
The INACH Secretariat did research into the use of negative expressions about
Dutch Jews during the Israel-Gaza conflict which were a direct reaction to the
conflict, using the French-language section of Twitter.
The hashtag #UnBonJuif (a good Jew) was used 689 times in antisemitic tweets
during Israel-Gaza conflict. The hashtag #UnJuifMort (a dead Jew) has been
removed by Twitter.
UEJF (The French Union of Jewish Students) asked the French court in 2013 to
have Twitter provide the identities of those using the hashtags #UnBonJuif and
#UnJuifMort. Ultimately UEJF won the court case and the appeal (2014), but
Twitter has still not provided the identities. UEJF has now started a civil suit
against Twitter. In the meantime Twitter claims to have made the use of the two
hashtags no longer possible, but our research shows this is not completely correct.
#UnJuifMort was blocked and all tweets using the hashtag were removed, but
some of the Tweets using this hashtag are still to be seen outside of France.
#UnBonJuif is still alive and kicking and was used 63 times on Twitter during the
past 30 days.
In the meantime, alternative antisemitic hashtags have become popular, like
#LesJuifsAuFours (The Jews in the Ovens) and #TuonsToutLesJuifsCesFilsDePute
(all the Jews are sons of whores).
Examples of French-language expressions on Twitter
@slt_t_magnifik un bon juif est un juif mort (magnificent, a good jew is a dead jew)
Le lobby juif contre la dmocratie shar.es/110zAb via @grtvnews (The jewish
lobby against democracy)
#UnBonJuif n'existe pas lol :-) (A good Jew does not exist lol )
Qui se souvient de " #UnBonJuif est bien dans un four " mdrrrr (remember a good
jew is good in an oven)
#UnBonJuif boit du sang d'enfant musulman pour decupler ses forces. (A good Jew
drinks the blood of Muslim children to multiply his strength)
#UnGayMort et #UnJuifMort est puni par la loi. Car les juifs dirigent le monde, et
la plupart de hommes politiques sont gays. #SachezLe (A Dead Gay and A dead
Jew, to say this is punishable by law. For the Jews rule the world, and most
politicians are gay)
21