Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
NOTATION
ai
fi
F
G
H
I
K
MWi
Mi
mi
N
P
R
R
Activity of component i
Fugacity of component i
Faradays constant
Change of Gibbs free energy in reaction (kJ)
Change of enthalpy in reaction (kJ)
Ionic strength, ML3 (i.e. mole L1 )
Equilibrium constant
Molecular weight of species i
Molarity of species i (moles of solute per litre of solution)
Molality of species i (moles of solute per kg of water)
Total number of gas mole in gas phase
sat
saturated water pressure, atm
Pressure; PW
Universal gas constant (italic letter)
The initial sodium ion fraction (R=NaAc/(HAc+NaAc))
in the solutes
Re(W) Number of water moles in equilibrium state
S
Change of entropy in reaction
T
Temperature, K
Mole fraction for species i in liquid phase
xi
Mole fraction for species i in gas phase
yi
Ion charge for ion species i
zi
834
Greek letters
i Activity coefficient of component i
i Fugacity coefficient of component i
i Chemical potential of component i
vi Stoichiometric coefficient of component i
Superscript
H
redox
sat
Vapour, Liquid
+,
Subscript
i, j, and k
W
Standard property
Infinite dilution
Henrys law
Oxidation-reduction
Saturated property
Vapour or Liquid phase
Ion charge of + or
Components or half reactions
Solvent (water)
INTRODUCTION
Many industrial agricultural and food processing waste streams
contain significant concentrations of dissolved salts. Wastewaters
www.soci.org
www.soci.org
MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Anaerobic micro-organisms in the digestion process use chemical
energy released by catabolism for growth and maintenance and
in the process produce end-products such as shorter chain fatty
acids, carbon dioxide and methane. For the catabolic reactions
to provide the chemical energy necessary, energy must flow from
a higher to a lower potential. The energy released is employed
to drive the anabolic reactions of the micro-organisms. The
bioenergy economy has been adopted to describe a two-phase
batch anaerobic digestion system with conservation of total
energy and minimization of biochemical convertible energy. The
partial degradation of a substrate by one microbial species has
been assumed to be directly linked to the removal of intermediate
products by other species. As the anaerobic micro-organisms
acclimatise to a given environment they are able to make a
consortium in which their individual metabolisms become highly
interlinked. This microbial consortium permits the system to
closely approach the thermodynamic equilibrium state (G = 0).9
In this work a network of redox equilibria has been established
to describe the metabolic reactions in an acclimatised anaerobic
consortium of acetoclastic and hydrogen utilising methanogens
linked via the exchange of electrons and protons. This approach is
consistent with the interspecies electron and proton hopping theory of Marcus.10 The phase equilibria of the end-products (CO2 , CH4
and H2 O) have been included to investigate the loss or uptake of
thermal (heat) energy by vaporisation/solubility of end-products as
well as the equilibria of acid dissociation (including aqueous CO2 ).
The thermodynamic equilibrium was simulated in an isothermal
and isobaric (298.15 K and 1 atm) batch digester. The initial substrates considered were a mixture of sodium acetate (CH3 COONa)
with acetic acid (CH3 COOH). The anaerobic digestion was assumed
to contain a fully acclimatized methanogenic consortium. A
two-phase (solution and gas) digester was assumed. The simple
stoichiometric model of methanogenesis considers only three
initial materials: liquid acetic acid, aqueous sodium acetate
and liquid water. In addition it also considers the quantitative
expressions that relate them to the 18 products and intermediates.
The thermodynamic framework comprises two parts. The first
includes equilibrium expressions that relate the relative activities
and or fugacities of all 21 species in the two phases to each other.
The second consists of the equations of state that quantify the relationships between activity in the liquid phase and fugacity in the
gas phase to the observable concentrations and partial pressures
via the respective activity and fugacity coefficients. The completed model consists of a set of highly non-linear simultaneous
equations which was solved using an algorithm based on the NewtonRaphson technique.11 13 The following sections describe
the development of the individual components of the model.
Stoichiometric model
Stoichiometric expressions were developed in the conventional
manner to quantify the possible relationships between the
initial materials and the various products and intermediates. 15
expressions describe the material relationships of the species
between the aqueous and gas phases, the ionization of the
electrolytes and the redox reactions. These relationships between
these initial species and the 18 products and intermediates are
set out in Table 1.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
835
www.soci.org
Table 1.
ST Oh, AD Martin
Electrolyte relations
H2 O (g) = H2 O (l)
H2 (g) = H2 (aq)
CO2 (g) = CO2 (aq)
H2 O (l) = H+ + OH
H2 (aq) = 2H+ + 2e
C2 H4 O2 (aq) = C2 H3 O2 + H+
Equilibrium relationships
Equilibrium models superimposed on the stoichiometric foundations are based on the fundamental definition of thermodynamic
equilibrium, which is defined as the equalisation of chemical
potentials between reactants and products:
(1)
vi i = 0
where vi is stoichiometric coefficient of component i and the
chemical potential i is expressed as the standard chemical
potential i and activity ai of component i under ideal conditions:
i = i + RT ln ai
Liquid
i
Vapour
Vapour
Vapour
= i
+ RT ln fi
Water
Carbon dioxide
Acetic acid
Stoichiometric reactions
log(Ka )
H2 O(l) = OH + H+
CO2 (aq) + H2 O = H2 CO3
CO2 (aq) + H2 O = HCO3 + H+
CO2 (aq) + H2 O = CO3 2 + 2H+
NaHCO3 (aq) = Na+ + HCO3
NaCO3 (aq) = Na+ + CO3
Na2 CO3 (aq) = 2Na+ + CO3 2
C2 H4 O2 (aq) = C2 H3 O2 + H+
14.00
4.38 102
6.37
16.70
3.68 102
1.27
4.21 102
4.76
vi i = vj +
j + vk k
(7)
(5)
Substituting Equations (2) and (5) into Equation (4) yields the
following relationship describing the vapour/liquid equilibrium,
where the constant K H corresponds to the Henrys law coefficient:
Vapour
Liquid
i
)
(i
fi
H
KiW (atm/mole) = exp
=
(6)
RT
ai fi
836
H
The subscript i-W indicates that the Henrys law coefficient KiW
is for solute i in solvent (water). It is assumed that acetic acid is
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
Electrolyte
equilibrium
constants
(4)
is described by
where vapor phase chemical potential i
fugacity fi based on an equation of state (EoS) model:
i
(2)
vi i
v
i
ln K =
=
ln ai i
(3)
RT
Vapour
i
Table 2.
Ka = exp
vi i vj j + vk k
RT
=
vj vk
(a+
j ) (ak )
v
ai i
(8)
Table 3.
www.soci.org
Mass balances
N(18.02yW + 2yH2 + 44yCO2 + 16yCH4 )+
+ 2mCO
+ mAc + mNaCO
Carbon Balance
Hydrogen Balance
Oxygen Balance
Sodium Balance
Vapour Balance
= mH+ + mNa+
mi is expressed as molality of species i, Re(W) is the number of moles for residual water, N is total number of moles in vapour phase. H2 O, CO2 , NaAc
and HAc (acetic acid) are the initial number of moles.
(9)
For the liquid phase there are three types of model for
description of the activity coefficients that can be considered: Ideal
model; DebyeHuckel
model and Pitzer model. These models are
Re(W)
N
yi MWi +
mi MWi + 1000 = 1000(g) (11)
55.494
i
i=H2 O
zi mi = zero
(13)
Gas phase
Fugacity fi and observable partial pressure yi P may be related in
a manner analogous to activity and concentration in the liquid
phase via the fugacity coefficient i .
fi = i yi P
(10)
Solution algorithm
The completed model describing the methanogenic equilibrium
comprises a set of 21 non-linear simultaneous equations. The
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
837
www.soci.org
Table 4.
ST Oh, AD Martin
P Liquid
sat sat
W
yW W P = W PW exp
dp
RT
Psat
W
P
W
H
H
2
yH2 H2 P = aH2 KH W exp
dp
RT
2
Psat
W
P
CO2 W
H
P
W
CH
H
4
yCH4 CH4 P = aCH4 KCH W exp
dp
RT
4
sat
P
H2 O (g) = H2 O (L)
H2 (g) = H2 (aq)
CO2 (g) = CO2 (aq)
CH4 (g) = CH4 (aq)
Electrolyte equilibria
H2 O = H+ + OH
KW = aH+ aOH
aH CO
KCO2 = a2 3
CO2
aHCO3 aH+
KH2 CO3 =
aCO2
aCO 2 a2H+
3
KHCO3 =
aCO2
aAc aH+
KHAc = a
HAc
aNa+ aHCO3
KNaHCO3 = a
NaHCO3
aNa+ aCO3
KNaCO3 = a
NaCO3
a2 Na+ aCO 2
3
KNa2 CO3 =
aNa2 CO3
Oxidation-reduction equilibria
yH4 2 4H2 yCO2 CO2 P4
redox
= KCH
yCH4 CH4
4
2
yH4 2 4H2 yCO
2 P6
redox
2 CO2
= KHC2
aHAc
sat
K H (the Henrys law constant); subscript HAc and Ac are represented as acetic acid and acetate ion respectively. PW
is saturated vapour pressure;
is molar volume; KW (water dissociation constant); K redox (redox potential equilibrium constants).
838
Equilibrium of methanogenesis
Oh and Martin12 studied the overall equilibrium of the
methanogenic, catabolic reactions under isothermal psychrophilic
(298.15 K) and isobaric (1 atm) conditions. The model gave a
prediction of the maximum chemical energy transport overall in the methanogenic process. Catabolic reactions in consorted methanogens (i.e acetoclastic and hydrogen utilizing
methanogens) convert energy-rich compounds to simpler but
still energy-rich compounds. The consortium enables the organisms to use the maximum amount of the available energy for their
growth and maintenance. They showed that the overall catabolic
reactions of methanogens can almost completely decompose
acetic acid (HAc) into end-products (methane and carbon dioxide). The end-products then expand into the vapour phase due to
their high volatility. Their results are consistent with Le Chateliers
principle as applied to a methanogenic process. The concentration
of protons (pH) controls the solubility of carbon dioxide and affects
both pCH4 in the gas phase and acetic acid (HAc) degradation.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
www.soci.org
0.03
1.0E-05
1.0E-06
1.0E-07
1.0E-08
1.0E-09
1.0E-10
1.0E-11
1.0E-12
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
Initial x (HAc) 0.03
R -0(mol./mol.)
R -0.2(mol./mol.)
R -0.001(mol./mol.)
R -0.5(mol./mol.)
1.0E+00
R -0.01(mol./mol.)
R -0.8(mol./mol.)
R -1(mol./mol.)
Figure 1. Fractional residual HAc in methanogenesis at 298.15 K and 1 atm for a variety of initial sodium ion fractions (R). Vertical dotted bars labeled
0.03 (mol L1 ) indicate the HAc equivalent of a nominal 10% solids digester feed.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
839
www.soci.org
ST Oh, AD Martin
0.03
(a)
0.03
(b)
0.9
0.9
0.8
CH4
(NaHCO3)=1
0.7
Partial pressure
0.8
0.6
0.5
(NaHCO3) <1
0.4
0.3
CO2
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
(NaHCO3) =1
0.2
0.1
0
1.0E-05
(NaHCO3) <1
0.7
0.1
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
0
1.0E-05
1.0E-00
1.0E-04
1.0E-03 1.0E-02
Initial x (HAc)
Initial x (HAc)
(c)
1.0E-01
1.0E-00
1.0E-00
(d)
9
1.00001
(NaHCO3) =1
(NaHCO3) <1
Yield (mole/mole)
1.000005
pH
1
CH4
0.999995
4
1.0E-05
CO2
1.0E-04
1.0E-00
0.99999
1.0E-05
R -0(mol./mol.)
R -0.001(mol./mol.)
R -0.2(mol./mol.)
R -0.5(mol./mol.)
1.0E-04
R -0.01(mol./mol.)
R -0.8(mol./mol.)
R -1(mol./mol.)
Figure 2. Partial pressures at 1 mol L1 of HAc (a), total CO2 phase distribution (b), equilibrium pH value (c) and yields of CH4 and CO2 (d) for a variety of
initial sodium mole fractions (R) at 298.15 K and 1 atm. Vertical dotted bars labeled 0.03 (mol L1 ) indicate the HAc equivalent of a nominal 10% solids
digester feed.
840
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
Hence, overall the results presented in Figs 1 and 2(d) suggest that
acetoclastic methanogens will be thermodynamically inhibited by
the increased equilibrium pH arising from the addition of sodium
ion to the initial solution, and that hydrogenophilic methanogens
will be inhibited to a much smaller extent.
HAc degradation in relationship to the concentration of carbonates at constant pH was investigated to compare the model with
empirical observations. Figure 3(b) quantifies the strong effect of
the equilibrium pH on the solubility of CO2 . However this change
produces only a relatively weak response in the methanogenic
degradation of HAc. The natural pH at the equilibrium decomposition of HAc is 4.73 (Fig. 2(c)). To examine the effects of lower
www.soci.org
(a) 1.E-05
1
HAc
AcResidual HAc + Ac-
1.E-06
0.9
0.8
Methane Contents
Concentration (mol/l)
1.E-07
1.E-08
1.E-09
1.E-10
1.E-11
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.E-12
0.2
1.E-13
0.1
0
10
12
14
pH
0.3
0
0
(b) 1.E+01
Carbonates (mol/l)
1.E-01
1.E-03
1.E-04
2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.E-02
0.2
Total carbonates
CO2 (aq.)+H2CO3
HCO3CO3-2
Na2CO3
NaCO3NaHCO3
1.E+00
0.1
10
12
14
pH
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
841
www.soci.org
(a)
ST Oh, AD Martin
(b)
0.03
0.03
1.E+01
1.E+00
7
pH
Ionic strength
1.E-01
1.E-02
6
1.E-03
1.E-04
1.E-05
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E-00
4
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
Initial x (HAc)
R -0(mol./mol.)
R -0.2(mol./mol.)
R -0.001(mol./mol.)
R -0.5(mol./mol.)
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E-00
Initial x (HAc)
R -0.01(mol./mol.)
R -0.8(mol./mol.)
R -1(mol./mol.)
I, R=1
I, R=0.8
I, R=0.2
I, R=0.01
DH, R=1
DH, R=0.8
DH, R=0.2
DH, R=0.01
P, R=1
P, R=0.8
P, R=0.2
P, R=0.01
Base Case
I, solid
boundary
DH, solid
boundary
P, solid
boundary
Figure 5. Ionic strength (a) and non-ideality of pH value (b) in variety of initial sodium mole fractions (R) of solutes at thermodynamic methanogenesis
equilibrium (298.15 K and 1 atm). Vertical dotted bars labeled 0.03 (mol L1 ) indicate the HAc equivalent of a nominal 10% solids digester feed. I stands
for the ideal model, DH for DebyeHuckel and P for PitzerPrausnitz model.
842
(ionic strength 0.00514 at constant 1 atm and 298.15 K). For the
empirical moleculemolecule interactions in the vapour phase,
Prausnitzs method15 was employed to describe the behaviour
of the highly polar gas molecules. The maximum ionic strengths
predicted by the ideal model (i.e. 0.9 mol L1 ) lie outside the
valid range for the DebyeHuckelPrausnitz
model. Despite the
lower solubility of the solid phase than the Pitzer model. It tells us
that the activity coefficient predicted from the DebyeHuckel
is
lower than the Pitzers empirical coefficient arising from the higher
molecularmolecular interaction. Thus, Fig. 5(b) shows that as either R or x is increased, molecularmolecular interaction increases
and the deviation of pH value between ideal and nonideal model
increases. The solid phase was increased while the other chemical
species in solution do not deviate much from Ideal behaviour.
However, despite the deviations in the predicted equilibrium pH
of non-ideal models, the remaining results of non-ideal model are
very similar to the results of the ideal equilibrium model. Under
these circumstances the interactions become insignificant for the
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
anaerobic digestion process and the ideal model can be used over
the whole range of ionic strength.
Enthalpy and entropy analysis
The overall change in enthalpy represents total production or
consumption of energy in an anaerobic digester. When the value
is positive, the process is endothermic, requiring external heat
energy to progress. Figure 6 shows that the enthalpy change
(A) of HAc conversion to CO2 (aq.) and CH4 (aq.) against initial x
of HAc was an exothermic process and almost independent of the
injection of sodium ion, but total enthalpy change (H of HAc
conversion to CO2 (g.) and CH4 (g.)) becomes endothermic due to
the H of vaporisation for CO2 and CH4 . Figure 6 also shows that
as R was increased the process becomes less endothermic and
at high values, R > 0.5, becomes exclusively exothermic. This is
entirely due to the increased solubility of CO2 .
The isothermal enthalpy change at equilibrium represents the
change of entropy. Since the change in Gibbs free energy is zero
at equilibrium, the change in entropy is equal to the change
in enthalpy per absolute temperature (S = H/T). Thus the
change in entropy has the same tendency as the change in
enthalpy. When the value is positive, it means that the overall
process of digesters is spontaneous from initial values to the static
equilibrium condition resulting in an increase in the degree of
disorder in the system. When the value is negative, it means that
the overall process is non-spontaneous. The results in Fig. 6 show
two cases: (H > 0 and S > 0) and (H < 0 and S < 0).
First, the case (H > 0 and S > 0) tells us that the system
requires external heat energy to proceed spontaneously and the
energy is consumed for the vaporisation of end-products (CH4
and CO2 ). Second, the case (H < 0 and S < 0) tells us that the
system produces heat energy, but the system does not progress
forward. In these two cases, the thermodynamic model tells us
that the addition of sodium ion to the initial solute may render
www.soci.org
0.03
1.E+04
1.E+02
Endotherm
1.E+00
1.E-02
-1.E-03
-1.E-01
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
Initial x (HAc) 0.03
R -0(mol./mol.)
R -0.001(mol./mol.)
R -0.2(mol./mol.)
R -0.5(mol./mol.)
R -1(mol./mol.)
Exotherm
-1.E+01
-1.E+03
1.0E+00
R -0.01(mol./mol.)
R -0.8(mol./mol.)
Figure 6. Enthalpy production in a variety of initial sodium fractions (R) at 298.15 K and 1 atm. Vertical dotted bars labeled 0.03 (mol L1 ) indicate the
HAc equivalent of a nominal 10% solids digester feed.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
1 Callander IJ and Barford JP, Recent advance in anaerobic digestion
technology. Process Biochem 18:2437 (1983).
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
843
the gas phase. The model results also indicate two contrasting
cases for methanogenesis: (H > 0 and S > 0) and (H < 0
and S < 0). In the former case, the model tells us that, for
very low initial concentrations of sodium ion, methanogenesis
is spontaneous depending on the relationship of solubility of
CO2 . However for the range of R (>0.5) substrate degradation is
predicted to be non-spontaneous despite the Gibbs free energy
change being negative. Thus the empirically observed inhibition
of gas formation brought about by elevated concentrations
of sodium ion may be partially explained by the loss of
thermodynamic spontaneity or the absence of an entropy driving
force. Under certain circumstances spontaneity may be restored
by providing external heat to vaporise the gases, in particular
dissolved carbon dioxide. Practically this may be achieved
in thermophilic digestion. The results of the thermodynamic
modeling strongly indicate that the inhibitory phenomena arising
from the presence of sodium ion in methanogenesis are directly
related to the entropic and enthalpic changes in the process rather
than the deviations from the neutral pH range (6.5<pH<8.0).
From the thermodynamic perspective, the model advises that
when the supply of thermal energy is sufficient, sodium inhibition
under anaerobic conditions can be virtually completely overcome.
The thermodynamic model also provides a design tool with which
the stability of methanogenesis in response to feedstock mixtures
containing sodium ion and a carbon source such as HAc can be
investigated. An operator using a thermodynamic model of his
process can predict, for example, the equilibrium pH and maximum
gas production and quality of individual gas components of the
digester and where this lies outside the prescribed range he may
choose to combine available feed materials in ratios to achieve
the desired equilibrium pH.
www.soci.org
2 Rinzema A, van Lier J and Lettinga G, Sodium inhibition of acetoclastic
methanogens in granular sludge from a UASB reactor. Enzyme
Microb Technol 10:2432 (1988).
3 Grasso D, Strevett K and Pesari H, Impact of sodium and potassium on
environmental systems. J Environ Syst 22:297323 (1993).
4 McCarty PL, Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals. Part three.
Public Works 95:9194 (1964).
5 Kugelman IJ and Chin KK, Toxicity, synergism, and antagonism in
anaerobic waste treatment processes. Adv Chem Series 105:5590
(1971).
6 Patel GB and Roth LA LAR, Effect of sodium chloride on growth
and methane production of methanogens. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 23:893897 (1977).
7 Ngian MF, Pearcea GR, Ngian KF and Lin SH, Anaerobic digestion of
sodium hydroxide pretreated pig faeces using sheep rumen liquor
or anaerobic digester mixed liquor as inoculum. Agric Environ
4:139154 (1978).
8 Bashir BH and Matin A, Combined effect of potassium and magnesium
on sodium toxicity in anaerobic treatment processes. ElectrJEnviron,
Agric Food Chem 4:827834 (2005).
9 Jackson BE and Mclnerney MJ, Anaerobic microbial metabolism can
proceed close to thermodynamic limits. Nature 415:454456
(2002).
ST Oh, AD Martin
844
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb