Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Languages are by nature extremely complex and describing a language is not an easy
task. To help with description and analysis it is better to divide a language into separate
components or different areas of analysis. Thus, Phonology looks at and describes the
sound system of a language, Morphology looks at the way words are formed, Syntax
seeks to describe the way words fit together to form sentences or utterances, and
Semantics and Pragmatics study meaning. Although these components interact with
each other, they can, to some extent, be looked at and described individually.
Syntax, or sentence structure means looking at the way words combine together to
form sentences. One way to study syntax is to look at sentences which we already know
to be considered syntactically well-formed sentences.
e.g. (1) I shot the sheriff. well formed.
(2) * The shot sheriff I.
By analysing or describing sentences such as (1) in terms of their constituent parts, we
can see the patterns that words follow when they fit together. It seems clear that
sentences are made up of units and that at one level these units are words. So, a
sentence consists of words or alternatively words are constituents of a sentence.
We use S to stand for sentence, and an arrow, to mean consists of. Thus S word +
word+....
There are rules governing the way in which words can be put together to form
syntactically well-formed or grammatical sentences.
e.g. (1) The girl likes the dog.
Here we have changed the word order, but the sentence still works. This suggests that
the words dog and girl are interchangeable. Of course, changing the words over
changes the meaning but the sentence is still well-formed. Because dog and girl are
interchangeable, they belong to the same word category. This category is called Noun.
S The + Noun + likes + the Noun.
girl
dog
girl
the
dog
This
girl
that
dog
If we have This girl likes the dog, we may replace likes with: loves, hates. They are
verbs and they belong to the same category.
S Determiner + Noun + Verb + Determiner + Noun
This
girl
likes
the
dog
loves
hates
Another way of representing this abstract structure is in a Tree Diagram.
S Determiner + Noun + Verb + Determiner + Noun
This
girl
likes
the
dog
This is a much more detailed and informative description about word order and the
kinds of words which can go together. It describes sentences in terms of the categories
the individual words belong to.
Phrases and Phrase Structure
E.g. A dog chased that girl.
Phrase A
Phrase B
Det
Noun
dog
verb
chased
Det
Noun
that
girl
NP
Det
VP
Noun
verb
NP
Det
This
girl
likes
SNP + VP
that
Noun
dog
VP verb + NP
= Adverb Phrase(Adv.P)
very=degree adverb
NP
VP
Adv. P
deg
Ken
snores
very
Adv.
loudly
NP
VP
PP
Sally
looked
up
AP
Adv.P
Disgustingly
fat
NP
VP
V [trans]
NP
Det
Kate
hugged
the
baby
NP
Det
The
NP
Det
dog
found
bone
NP
VP
V [trans]
Jenny
hit
NP
him
Intransitive verbs:
1) Ken snores.
S
NP
Vp
V [intrans]
Ken
snores
NP
VP
Det
V [intrans]
The
baby
cried
Ditransitive Verbs:
DO + I.O
NP
VP
V [ditrans]
NP
Det
Roy
told
NP
Det
the
children
NP
VP
V [intens]
NP
Det
Sally
became
doctor
NP
VP
V [intens]
PP
Intensive Verbs:
story
NP
Det
George
is
in
the
garden
NP
VP
V [intens]
AP (adjective phrase)
Sue
seems
unhappy
Complex-transitive Verbs:
Kate thought John a fool.
NP
VP
V (complex) NP
Kate
NP
Det
thought John
fool
The Sentence
The sentence is the main object of linguistic description. This is due to its being the
unit or prime at the highest level of linguistic form - the syntactic level. The sentence
enjoys a status of independence at its own level of occurrence- i.e. structural
dependence, as well as at the other levels such as the phonological level, the sentence
being marked off by a unique phonological contour and by boundary signals - the
junctures, or the semantic level, the sentence being assigned a global semantic
interpretation.
At the same level there also occur the phrasal units, also representing syntactic
categories. They share a number of properties and relational properties. They both help
to the realization of endo-centric and exo-centric configurations. Attempts to define the
sentence in traditional grammars failed precisely because of the fact that the sentence is
a very complex linguistic object. Most traditionalists were inclined to limit their
definitions to the semantic peculiarities of sentence. Curme, for instance, says that a
sentence is an expression of a thought or feeling by means of a word or words used in
such form and manner as to convey the meaning intended. The definition is followed by
a discussion of the form and functions of sentence. It is only at the end of the discussion
10
that Curme mentions the structural aspect of sentence, its make-up (subject +
predicate).
Structuralists focused on the formal independence of the unit S. Bloomfield, for
instance, defined S as a grammatical unit between the constituent parts of which there
exist distributional limitations and dependences, but which can itself be put into no
distributional class. He argues that a set of utterances including How are you? Its a
fine day cannot be grouped on grammatical grounds into one larger form. Hence, S is
the maximum unit upon which the distributional properties can be best studied.
The sentence is a string of lexical formatives (words) organized according to the
following
principles:
up
the constituents of S.
the
system
of
Determiners
in
the
respective
language.
The syntactically relevant aspect consists in the word order possibilities for each
language.
Taking into account the form of sentences (including, on the one hand, the deep and
surface configuration and, on the other hand, the phonological/graphic peculiarities)
and the communicative function of each formal type, there are four types of
sentences:
1. Declarative sentences specialized for giving information under the form of
statements.
2. Interrogative sentences specialized for requesting missing information.
3. Imperative sentences (or commands) specialized for requesting action, under the
form of orders.
4. Exclamatory sentences, specialized for expressing subjective reactions, feelings etc.
Classification of sentences according to the degree of structural complexity:
a) Simple sentences (simplexes) are based upon one predication relation, realized by a
finite verb form.
b) Compound sentences are based upon the coordination (conjoining) of two or more
sentences.
e.g. Dinner was over and the kids went to bed.
c) Complex sentences are based upon subordination (embedding) of at least one S. The
tree structure of complex sentences contains at least one S mode (dominated by another
S mode) besides the initial S.
E.g. Sarah admitted she was wrong.
S
NP
VP
Aux
MV
12
Sarah
-ed
admit
NP
The S modes on branches lower than the initial S signal embedded clauses. Clauses
may be, in their turn, sub-classified according to the V form of their predication:
a) Finite clauses, those whose V form carries the markers of Mood, Tense and Aspect.
b) Non-finite clauses whose V form is an Infinitive, a Gerund or a Participle.
E.g. Johns telling a lie shocked his friends.
Ger-cl
It is a shame to tell a lie.
Inf-cl
Ba
sic Sentence configurations
An inventory of the main S configurations of English may be carried out along two
levels:
a) by supplying the relatively small set of deep structure configurations;
b) by supplying a very long list of the surface configurational possibilities dictated by
the word order.
There are two essential aspects of S structure that help us differentiate the basic S
configurations:
A. the Constituent structure of S.
B. the Relational sequence in S.
13
substituted for one another. Nominal phrases, for instance, represent a large class of
constituents of the same type, which includes inter-substitutable sub-types:
-NP.s of various degrees of complexity: Tony, my dog, three blind mice, an old
Romanian folk custom, etc.
Pronouns: he, all of them, mine, everybody
-Nominalization: the building of new libraries
-clauses: that Susan will marry next month, Jamess sitting up late.
2) It is only constituent sequences that may be substituted, deleted, moved or inserted in
sentences, in other words transformations affect only constituents:
Substitution: Bill repeated his lesson yesterday morning and (by Pro-VP) his sister
did to yesterday evening.
.
Pro-VP
NP
NP
NP
Adv. P.
D. O.
Nevertheless, such modal sequences are allowed to occur if the modals belong to two
different constituents:
E.g. People who must can learn English in month.
6) Idioms in English have a constituent status. Thus a dog in the manager is an NP
idiom, go to the dogs -a VP idiom, Time and tide wait for no man an S idiom.
B.The Relational Sequence in S
The constituents making up a S enter a number of well defined grammatical relations,
mainly materialized as relations between the predicating verb and each of the NPs
positions on its left and right.
e.g. The boys were flying a big kite.
.
NP
VP
NP
15
Subj
Predicative
Sentences of this type are one-term configurations, i.e. the verb takes as co-occurent
term the Subject NP. This NP may be simple or phrasally coordinated if the Pred. Adj.
is reciprocal:
e.g. The problem is interesting.
Men and women are equal.
In case be+ Pred. Adj. renders properties pertaining to exterior circumstances
(temperature, weather, atmosphere, etc), the Subj. NP is unspecified in deep structure
and It Insertion applies so as to produce surface strings:
e. g
The Subject may be clausal in case the Pred. Adj. belongs to the subcategory including:
advisable, necessary, possible, recommendable. As a result
of extraposition of the
Subject Clause and It insertion, the following surface structure configurational type is
produced:
16
e.g. [That Bill has been to Africa] is incredible -> It is incredible [that Bill has been to
Africa].
With Pred. Adj. of the subcategory including (un)likely, certain, some, besides the
above surface variant, there may be obtained a surface configuration of the form:
e.g. John is likely to win the contest.
from [ John to win the contest ] is likely .
The Subject of the Subject Clause has been raised in the position of Subject of the
main clause.
Sub-type 1.b {[NP] ^ [be ^Pred NP]}
Subj
a)
Predicative
Indefinite NP as Predicative:
Marian is a beauty. His aim is freedom.
Definite NP as Predicative:
We are the owners.
She will be the president.
The Subject may be sentential and it may undergo Extraposition and It- insertion, if the
NP is a relatively fixed phrase such as: a pleasure, a necessity, no good, no use, fun.
The clause may be finite (a That clause) or non-finite (infinitival or gerundial).
e.g. [That he should learn a foreign language] is a necessity.
It is a necessity that he should learn a foreign language.
[To visit people/ visiting people] is fun.
It is fun to visit people/ visiting people.
17
The embedded sentences may be indirect questions, relative clauses without expressed
antecedent, and other complement clauses.
e.g. [What puzzled her] was [that he should have said such a thing]
Subject Clause
Predicative Clause
v ^ Predicative ^ P O
With I.O
Subj
Ski-running is difficult for Sarah.
b)
Pred. Adj
IO/PNP
18
{[NP] ^ [v]}
Subj
e.g
These are one-term configurations which may optionally include Adverbial Phrases of
various kinds: Manner, Place, Time, Purpose, Cause.
e.g. The man was crying (with pain). - Adv P- Cause
The woman was crying (bitterly). Adv. P- Manner
The pupils were working (hard) (in the school-yard) (at 5).
Adv.P Manner Adv. P Place Adv P Time
Some intransitive verbs such as seem or happen take a Complement Clause as
sentential Subject. The Subject Clause undergoes transformational operations which
finally result in surface configuration:
e. g. It seems that prices will go down.
Prices seem to have gone down.
It happened that Gloria was missing.
Gloria happened to be missing.
Some configurations are predicated by verbs that obligatory take [+set] Subject (often
expressed by a phrasally conjoined NP)
e.g. The car and the motor-bike collided.
With weather verbs, the unspecified deep Subject is realized in surface by inserted it:
e. g. It frosted (hard) (yesterday).
19
This sub-type is predicated by the so-called complex intransitive verbs. They take as
obligatory co-occurent adjunct a PNP or an Adv. P. The PNP may be an Indirect Object
marked by to or a Prepositional Object:
e.g. He finally submitted to their pressure. (PNP/ IO)
The river abounds in fish. (PNP/ PO)
The book consists of five sections. (PNP/ P O)
He was looking for his old shoes.
You can rely on this fellow.
Most prepositional verbs (except the ones that take to IOs, as well as abound in,
consist of and a few others) allow passivization:
e.g. This fellow can be relied upon.
A subgroup of the same verbs may take a Complement Clause functioning as
Prepositional Object:
e.g.
Gerundial Cl. preserves the deep Prep., while in a That Cl. the Prep. is deleted.
Sub-type 3
20
Subject ^ v
^ IO/PO1^PO2
PO2
e.g.
All these are two-term configurations; the second term is a Direct Object. Reversion of
these terms is made possible by the Passive Transformation, which applies to most
transitive configurations (with a few exceptions such as the sentence above predicated
by have (got)).
In case the subject NP is co-referential with the Direct Object NP, the latter is
obligatory replaced by the reflexive pro-form:
21
22
^ DO ^ IO
^ ^ O1 ^ O2
23
The strings with ask may take embedded indirect questions (optionally accompanied by
I.O deletion):
e.g. We asked (the teacher) whether the paper should be handed in at 9.
Strings with answer may take That-complement clauses as DO (optionally with IO
deletion)
e.g. She answered (me) that she hadnt seen the man.
^ DO
24
e.g.
Syntactic Relations
Predication
25
The Auxiliary
b)
The Auxiliary sub-string consists of grammatical formatives that make the grammatical
categories pertaining to V. It is characterized by a sequence of affixes (bound
morphemes): -s, -ed, -en, -ing that alternate with auxiliary verbs (free morphemes):
modals, aspect auxiliaries have and be.
26
1)
2)
3)
We start from the formal criterion that a copula is a verb that realizes predication
according to the rule:
MV-> v ^ Pred. Adj. P
Pred. NP
Consequently we obtain a class which is homogenous formally, but not semantically.
Further subcategorization obtains if one takes into account:
1)
Subject selection
2)
b)
Semantically poor, but having one or several specified features such as:
(+inchoative)- become, go, run; (+ aspectual)- remain, rest; (+existential)- lie, stand
Copula-like Verbs:
MAKE: If you work hard, you will make a good engineer.
Jack and Mary make a handsome couple.
He made friends with my daughter.
27
The meaning is: be, develop into, turn out to be. The predicative is an NP, usually [definite].
FALL: His best jokes all fell flat.
He fell a victim to his wifes cruelty.
He fell into disgrace.
Meaning: be (unsuccessful), come to be/ become / reach a state. The predicative is an
Adj. Phrase, a nonprepositional NP or prepositional NP (into NP)
LIE: The book lay open on the table.
The snow lay thick on the ground.
Meanings: remain in a certain state/position. LIE exclusively takes an Adjectival
Predicate, followed by a Place Adverbial.
HOLD: The argument still holds good/ true.
STAND: Tom stands alone among his colleagues.
(V ^ Pred. Adj. ) : We will stand firm.
V ^ NP: Who stands first on the list.
V ^PNP: We stand in need of help.
REST: You may rest assured that nothing else will interfere.
SIT: resembles LIE, its meaning being even stronger felt.
e.g. To sit tight is to remain firmly in ones place.
Figuratively it means to stick firmly to ones purpose, opinions, etc.
PASS: They pass for rich. PNP
She passes as an experienced doctor. PNP
The Predicative is a PNP required by the fixed prepositions for and as (the latter a
weakened conjunction). Its meaning is consider to be ^ Adjective.
28
The Predicative
The Predicative is the non-empty constituent of the copulative predicate. Concerning
the relation holding between the Subject and its Predicate, one might notice that it is
unmarked in English. The Predicative may be basic, if taken by the verbs discussed as
copulas, or derived from a compound / complex sentence with a clausal Subject or
Object. The derived Predicative goes by the name of Predicative Adjunct to the
Subject / Object or Subject (ive)/ Object (ive) Complement in traditional grammars.
e.g. They appointed Professor Jones head of the department.
Pred. Adjunct to D.O
29
Attitudinal verbs are an important source of Pred. Adjs. Basically they are transitive
verbs which evince a derivation from the general subject selection rules in that the
[+human] NP is taken as D.O, rather than Subject:
e.g. The idea surprised everybody present.
Subj. [-animate] [+causative] D.O [+human]
Other attitudinal verbs: please, frighten, puzzle, astonish, amaze, scare, delight,
disappoint, disgust, etc.
Their ing participles occur as Pred. Adjs. which take Prepositional Indirect Objects
expressing the Experiencer.
e.g. The idea was surprising to (cop. ^ Pred. Adj.) everybody present. (I.O [+human])
Reversion of the two terms -> Passivization:
e.g. Everybody present was surprised by the idea.
DO-> Subj.
BE+ -en ^v
Subj. -> PO
30
Co-occurrence of adjectives with nouns which they modify or with copulas which they
help predicate determines a Subcategorization of adjectives:
a)
b)
c)
differences.
a)
adjectives prefixed by a and indicating states or conditions: ablaze, afraid, akin, alike,
alive, alone, asleep, awake, etc.
e.g. The whole building was ablaze.
He stood aghast at the terrible sight.
He was fast asleep.
Some of these Pred. Adjectives take Prepositional Objects (the Prep they require is
included into their lexical entries):
e.g. Pity is often akin to love.
The town was ablaze with lights.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
The rule feature [+/- Complementation] further subcategorizes these Pred. Adjs. Thus,
afraid, ashamed, awake may take complement clause:
e.g. I was afraid of hurting his feelings. (Ger. Cl)
She was afraid to wake her husband up. (Inf. Cl.)
Im afraid that I might hurt her feelings. (That Cl)
Most Pred. Adjectives may appear in derived configurations, as Predicative Adjunct to
the Direct Object. The respective constructions are [+causative]: to set a house ablaze.
If quantified, some of them may occur as Noun Modifiers: a half asleep person, a very
ashamed girl, a fully aware convict.
b)
31
subcategory
includes
Prepositional
Pred.
Adjs.
which
are
[+
a heavy luggage
He was a heavy smoker. (Adj NP)
32
b)
A complex S whose matrix clause has as Subject the subject of the subordinate
Subject Clause:
[HE IS LIKELY TO ARRIVE BEFORE NOON]
Raised Subject
Pred. Adj.
Subject Cl.
Adjectives like difficult, easy which predicate strings with the surface forms:
a)
33
b)
B)
Subcategorization as to the right term
Like verbs, adjectives may take Object NPs., which are exclusively Prepositional at the
deep structure level. The object NP may be:
1)
Non-clausal i) Indirect Object, the NP selected as such being [+human] and
the Preposition being to/for/of.
e.g. The lesson was too difficult for those beginners.
ii) Prepositional Object - the Pred. Adjs. taking [+abstract] Objects
e.g. Mary was afraid of nightmare/snakes.
Predicatives with Undeletable Preposition
a)
Of-phrases , occurring in rather fixed constructions such as:
They are of the same opinion.
The event was of a great importance.
Be ^ of has a possessive meaning.
b)
Prepositional NPs in which Preposition is not of.
About: It was 7 oclock and people were already about their business.
Above: His behaviour was above reproach.
Against: These recent steps are against the public interest.
At: Johns mother is at him again.
Before: He claimed he had been before me in that queue.
Behind: What could be behind his interest in my career?
Below: The quality of product should not be below the last years level.
Beside: Whoever did it is beside the point.
Between: This is strictly between you and me.
For: What is she for a woman, I wonder?
Predicatives with Deletable Preposition
A whole group including of NPs which indicates attributes connected with colour, size,
age, quality, shape may undergo Prep. Del. and thus result in zero article NP Predicates.
e.g. These shoes are (of) the right size.
She is (of) the same age.
The Predicative NPs above are all determined by definite articles and Post determiners.
Indefinite NPs may also occur in this position. (more seldom)
e.g. The leaves were (of) a dark shade.
The deletion process may extend over the article as well and the result is a zero article
NP:
34
Pred. Adjs. that indicate a positive reciprocal relationship: equal, join, married,
all of which take the Preposition from: different, distinct, far, separate, isolated etc.
35
including adjuncts of the kinds mentioned above as well as Predicative Adjuncts are
called complex intransitives.
Simple Intransitives
Simple intransitive verbs are what traditional grammars used to call verbs of complete
predication. Semantically they express events of all types: activities, processes or
states with reference to a wide range of possible subjects. Because of the fact that they
occur as one-place or one-term verbs, predicating an act pure and simple of some
particular person or thing, they are also called subjective verbs.
Syntactically, these predicates can take as optional adjuncts semantically independent
Prepositional Objects, as well as Adverbial Modifiers of various kinds:
e.g. The lilies have (splendidly) bloomed.(in my garden)- Manner Adv. / Place Adv.
The little boy has slept (two hours) Q. Adv. (this afternoon) - Time Adverb
36
Simple intransitives may derive from basically transitive verbs with particle, by means
of Object Deletion:
e.g. Moore throws in the ball near the half-line.
Moore throws near the half-line.
Another class of simple intransitives which evinces lexical complexity includes
intransitive verbs, which are inherently reflexive: absent oneself, perjure oneself. Some
of these verbs belong to the larger syntactic class of complex intransitives, in that they
take Prepositional Object: avail oneself of smth., pride oneself on smth.
Complex Intransitives
Complex intransitives are two-place verbs, i.e. they take two obligatory co-occurent
phrases: the Subject NP as a left neighbour of verb and the Predicative Adjunct /
Prepositional Object /Adverbial Modifier as a right neighbour.
e.g. A gang of thieves broke into Smiths house last night.
The company has fallen into dispute in recent years.
Intransitives with Particle and Preposition: the class includes phrasal Verbs which
take a fixed Preposition followed by its object:
e.g. They had done away with this piece of legislation.
I cannot put up with his interruption.
In between the Particle and the Prepositional Object there may be inserted Adverbs of
Manner:
e.g. They had done away reluctantly with this piece of legislation.
We put up cheerfully with these interruptions.
Intransitives with a Prepositional Indirect Object
Several subclasses of intransitives, among which eventive Vs., experience Vs.,
relational Vs., take an Indirect Object marked by the Preposition to.
e.g Whats happened to the old man?
The experience type verbs are seem, appear, occur, sound, taste.
e.g. How does it seem to you?
That possibility had never occurred to anyone.
Intransitives with two Prepositional Objects
A number of intransitive Vs may be followed by two PNPs, Prepositional Object
Deletion often applies.
37
Transitive Predications
1. Simple transitive verbs are transitive verbs with one object -Direct Object.
38
The greatest majority of transitive verbs in English express human activities, events in
which humans play an agentive part being initiators and controllers of actions or
processes which affect or effect concrete entities - physical objects or substances.
e.g. *John cut/ dropped [that cl]
The first subclass includes monotransitives which indicate activities associated with
affected objects: accumulate (goods, a library), adapt, adjust, decorate, air (the room).
A subcategory apart includes verbs which take as direct objects parts of the human
body: bite (ones tongue), bump (ones head), clap (hands), clean, cock, snap, fix, nod,
drag.
A special type are verbs with effected/ resultative object which are so called Cognate
Object, taken by inherently intransitive verbs, that re-categorize, in this way, as
transitives: to dream a melancholy dream, to smile an amiable smile, to sleep the sleep
of the just.
Some transitive verbs, like MAKE are characterized by a wide range of co-occurrence
possibilities, materialized syntactically in the non-clausal or clausal object and
semantically in the selection of [+concrete] or [+abstract] NPs.
Make with [+concrete] effected object: to make bread/coffee/a fire/clothes/tea/a toy,
a.s.o. This make often enters ditransitive configurations, in which the resultative object
is followed by a for Indirect Object indicating the beneficiary:
e.g. She was very fond of making toys for her little boy.
Make with [+ abstract] effected object: to make amends/arrangements/a change/a
decision/a demand/a difference/an effort/ a request.
In many of the instances included here make occurs as a quasi-dummy verb, the
meaning being mainly carried by the resultative object.
The latter is often a nominal derived from the verb that corresponds to the whole
combination:
-to make arrangements=to arrange
39
The dummy vb+Obj. of result sometimes differs aspectually from the purely
verbal one:
e.g. Promise to come back!
Make a promise to come back!
By nominalization, the resulting NP acquires most of the specific N features and
adjuncts. Thus, countability is very obviously realised by the specialized determiners:
e.g. He made a profit of shilling on every article sold.
MAKE can also occur with a more abstract meaning than the `manufacturing`
meaning. It is one of the important general causative verbs in English and syntactically,
it becomes (+complementation) in this case. Causative make takes a [+abstract] Direct
Object, expressed by an Infinitival Clause.
e.g. His gestures would make [everybody laugh]
DO co-occurs less than Make with [+concrete] objects, which is partly explainable by
the absence of the `manufacturing` meaning. DO is semantically specialised for
rendering the performance of certain activities such as writing, cooking, cleaning, etc
and the object is either affected or effected.
e.g. Mr. Booth does the fiction for the Saturday Review.
She does her hair every 3 days.
I have a lot of correspondence to do. (read /write letters)
40
DO- may be a ditransitive verb which takes [+abstract] Direct Objects in a great
number of dative construction: to do smb. credit/ a favour, to do smb. harm, to do smb.
honour.
-DO and Make only very seldom vary freely as in: to make/to do a copy; to make/to do
a translation.
-DO never takes clausal Direct Objects
-DO, unlike Make is a VP substitute, i.e. it is a pro-form which, in combination with
the neuter pronoun it or the pro-adjective/adverb so, may be used anaphorically to
replace a whole VP antecedent:
e.g. Tom has asked me to write him a letter as soon as I arrive in Paris, but I dont
think Ill be able to do it before next week.
A relatively small number of monotransitives with [+concrete] Direct Object denote the
use of an instrument for the performance of a certain activity.
e.g. Tom refused to show Peter how to handle the gun.
Another limited group of monotransitives, with [+concrete] Direct Object express
position or movement in space. The directional or locative meaning is incorporated into
the meaning of the respective verb: to enter a place, to approach a place (get near), to
inhabit a flat, to join a club (get in), to leave a town (depart from), to reach a
destination (arrive at).
The next subcategory includes other classes of verbs which take an inanimate Direct
Object. The group includes: to accept (a gift/idea), to acknowledge (a parcel/ truth), to
approach (a place or a topic), to claim (a lost object/ a right), to analyse (a substance
or a cause), to collect (stamps or ones thoughts), to deny (a signature or a proposal),
to examine (a paper). Some of them are marked by [+complementation].
Transitives verbs which occur only with [+abstract] objects will be themselves
subdivided into those which are [-complementation] and those which may appear as
[+complementation]:
41
a)
[+/- complementation] Vt with abstract D.O: mental process verbs and verbs of
Causative verbs
Causative verbs (periphrastic, lexical, morphological) are transitive verbs inherently
marked by [+causative] or intransitive ones recategorized as transitives and occurring
contextually as causatives. They express either mere causation of an event (cause,
determine, have, make, set) or an event in which causation is implied, e.g. kill (cause
smb. to die), teach (cause smb. to learn), show (cause smb. to see).
Causative meaning has a number of overt grammatical realizations. Thus all causative
constructions are transitive, owing to the fact that causation always implies two
participants:
A causer and
42
They are expressed by two NPs, of which one is selected as Subject and the other one
as Object:
e.g. The war caused great human losses.
NP1=causer Vt [+caus] NP2= effected
By passivization the effected entity may become Subject and the causer Prepositional
Object:
e.g. Great human losses were caused by the war.
While it is true that only transitive verb constructions may render causative meaning, it
is also true that not all causative verbs are inherently transitive. There are intransitive
verbs that behave contextually like transitive causatives.
In point of selectional restrictions, causative may take a Subject NP characterized by
one of the three kinds of semantic-syntactic features:
a) A [+animate] NP, expressing the agent or animate causer of the action, process or
state:
e.g. Tristam ^ caused ^ the cheese ^ to become ^ a paste.
[+causer]
[-animate/-abstract]
[+causative]
[-animate]
[-abstract]
43
44
Lexical Causatives
Lexical Causatives form pairs with intransitive verbs, denoting the resultative aspect of
the respective activity, process or state by means of a lexically distinct item.
45
a)
Caesar died.
b)
The verb die occurs as one-term verb, taking the Patient as Subject. The same Patient
occurs as Object of its causative counterpart kill, which is a two-term verb, with an
Agent as Subject. The relation between the transitive and intransitive verb
configurations is localized, in that the possibility of using the same V lexeme: Brutus
died Caesar.
This is the main difference between the verbs in this class and those belonging to the
ergative class, which evince no lexical differences when used transitively or
intransitively:
e.g. Our foreign trade is developing.(Vi)
Vi=Vt
Vt
Fall
Lie
46
Sit
Bite
Morphological causatives
A great number of causative transitives are converted from adjectives which denote an
attribute acquired as a result of a cause. Most of these verbs can also be used
intransitively with an inchoative meaning. The word-formation process may be:
Conversion: She cooled the soup.(Adj->V; paraphrase: She caused the soup to
be cool)
Other derivatives: to bare, black, blind, calm, clean, clear, dry, empty, free.
Affixation subdivided into: a) prefixation: BE-: becalm, belittle; DIS-:
discontent, disjoint, disanimate; EN: enlarge, enrich, ennoble. b) Suffixation:
-ate: activate, differentiate; -ify: amplify, happify, solidify; -ize: civilize,
americanize, legalize, fertilize; -en: blacken, darken, deeper, fasten, harder,
shorten, soften, widen.
Dative Causatives
This subcategory includes causatives that take two objects, one of which is indirect:
-give=cause smb. to have
47
Reflexivization is possible with some of them, if the subject NP is co- referent with the
Object NP.
He would blame himself for the accident.
Transitives with Particle
Transitives with Adverbial Part subcategorize as the rule feature for the local
transformation of Particle Movement .
1.
The Particle basically precedes the Object NP; it is moved optionally in post Object
position if the NP is non-pronominal and obligativity, if the NP is a personal pro - form.
The man filled in the application incorrectly.=> Particle Movement =>
The man filled the application in incorrectly.
There are some other strings in the domain of Particle Movement: to break down, to
clean out (a room), to play back (a programme); to wake up (a story), to bring up (the
children).
As a result of Nominalization, hyphenated or non-hyphenated compounds may be
obtained; they behave like the ones derived from intransitives with Particle:
The travel agentt made a complete mess-up of our bookings.
The accountant did a break down of expenditure.
The subcategory includes verbs which never take the Prt. as immediate
neighbour surface structure: the Object NP always precedes the Part as a result of Part
Movement.
49
Other contexts include, for instance, to knock (a blow) off; to throw (the ball) in.
Except in cases when the Object is a pro-form, the verb Prt. combination does
The last category is that of transitive V Prt. combinations that are followed by a
Prt
Obj
There are some other verb contexts of the same type: to bring subject up
50
Syntactic Relations
NP Functions
THE SUBJECT
Basic Subject Properties
Semantically, basic Ss are less meaning dependent on other (sentential) structures than
non-basic Ss are: The sentence The parrot spoke is semantically more independent (i.e.
we understand it without recourse to another S) than I was surprised that the parrot
spoke/ at the fact the parrot spoke.
Ss in this set cannot be understood unless we understand the simpler, basic S we
mentioned first. Basic Ss are also characterized by semantic simplicity, they are the
semantically primitive Ss of a language, mostly declarative and affirmative.
Formally, basic Ss exhibit the greatest morphological and syntactic potential of the Ss
in a language:
a). the greatest range of markers for the categories pertaining to their essential
constituents;
b). the greatest privileges of occurrence;
c). syntactically they will lend themselves most easily to the main syntactic process in
language.
Another characteristic of basic Ss is related to their minimal degree of structural
ambiguity. The fact that the basic structures are in general unambiguous can be
accounted for by their constituency properties: having fewer constituents than
compound Ss, they evince fewer possibilities for the interpretation.
English turns out to be more subject-oriented than other languages.
51
To illustrate, Romanian is less subject-oriented than English in that the presence of the
Subject in surface structure, as well as its fixed position are not among the obligatory
subject properties of Romanian, while they are so in English.
The object can be tentatively defined by taking into account the extent to which an NP
in a S has the properties pragmatic, semantic and syntactic.
1). Independent Existence
The property refers to the independent existence of the entity exposed by the basic
sentence as to the action of property exposed by the predicate. Some of the non
subject terms, more especially the objects, denote effected entities, whose existence is
rather dependent on the act expressed by the predicating verb:
e.g. A very ingenious designer has built up this telephone model.
The entity this telephone model results from the very act of building up, which has
been performed by the entity grammatically exposed by the NP Subject a very
ingenious designer.
The independence is apparent only in the case of some V subcategories, whose
semantics is based on a certain orientation as in the case of causative verbs (oriented
from causer the Subject to affected or effected entity the Direct Object).
Indispensability. The property refers to the fact that a non-subject term may, under
certain conditions, be deflected from the surface string, while a Subject cannot remain
unexpressed.
John writes poems for a living.
John writes poems.
John writes for a living.
* writes poems.
d) Autonomous Reference. It is a rather undeniable fact that the reference of the NP
Subject in basic sentences is to be determinated pragmatically, that is by a certain
addressee and at a certain moment of a speech act performance. This reference does not
depend on the reference of other NP-s that follow it.
e) Subjects in basic sentences are controllers of coreference phenomena in the
following two ways:
1. Control of reflexive pronouns
52
53
A bowl was on the shelf => There was a bowl on the shelf.
[- def]
[def]
THERE INSERTION
1.
There Insertion reorders the deep Subject as to some verbal part of the VP (the
The Dative Transformation reorders the two Objects taken by alternative verbs:
The Passive Transformation reorders the deep Subject and Object (Direct,
Indirect, Prepositional).
There in Traditional Approaches
There is discussed in scholarly traditional grammars as well as it, as one of the two
possible anticipating Subjects in English.
The Domain of There Insertion
There insertion applies mostly to strings predicated by intransitive verb subcategories,
among which existential verbs (be, happen, occur, exist, live), verbs of seeming (seem,
appear), aspectual verbs (begin, start, remain), verbs of motion (come, run, arrive,
etc.).
Very few configurations may undergo this transformation, e.g. the verbs need, want and
require.
e.g.
Passive sentences may turn into there construction owing to the presence of auxiliary
BE. Besides, continuous verbs forms, be they transitive or intransitive, may yield
there constructions.
54
The verb BE prevails in the domain of this transformation. All configurations whose
predicate contains one of the following types of BE occurrences: main verb
(existential BE), auxiliary (be as a marker of Aspect the continuous or Voice the
Passive), configurations predicated by copulative verb BE
1) There will be an adequate supply of goals
| existential be
| auxiliary be occurrence
4) There has been a deer killed by a poacher. | for the Cont. Aspect and Passive Voice
5) There was a concerto being played by a famous cellist. => combination of the
Continuous Passive
The common feature of those examples, besides the presence of a BE verb, is the
indefiniteness of their Subject NP-s.
Other Verbs in the Domain
As far as the verb is concerned, the domain of Insertion also includes verbs other than
BE:
There appeared some marks on the X-ray plates.
There happened to be a few students in the hall.
There occurred an unexpected incident during the meeting.
There came a stranger who broke the news to us.
There existed some poor families in that district.
There once lived in this flat an excentric lady.
There resulted a big discrepancy between their testimony and ours.
There were arising new progressive forces in those years.
There seemed to be no escape.
The Indefinite Subject NP Condition
Starting from a sentence such as: The small dog was in the yard, the following
ungrammatical string results if we apply There Insertion:
*There was the small dog in the yard.
The main condition for this transformation to apply is the indefiniteness of the NP
functioning as deep Subject. Indefinite reference of this NP may be realized by
55
indefinite Determiners (a, any, some) as well as the zero article. The determiner may
incorporate negation:
There was no trace left by the thieves.
There will be no other changes in the document.
The determiner may be numerically specified or an indefinite Quantifier:
There are two cakes on the dish.
There is much noise in the street.
Indefinite Pro-forms may function as Subjects of there constructions (anything,
something, everything, nothing). Quite often they are followed by Adj. P:
There was something wrong/nothing wrong in her behaviour.
There isnt anything new in the article.
There was something add in his conduct.
The definite article may appear as a constituent of the NP-Subject in a limited number
of contexts. Thus, it may be part of the Determiner Phrase (Determiner +
Postdeterminer) as in:
There was the same man in front of the gate.
There is the other delegate taking the floor.
Exceptionally though, there constructions may have a [+definite] Subject in the
context of an existential question asking for (supplementary) information. Sometimes
the answer consists of an enumeration of definitely determined NP, as in:
Question: What else is there in that drawer?
Answer: There is the rubber, the red pencil and the writing paper.
There are some more contexts in which the definite Subject can be encountered:
There has arisen the new problem of the status of the worker in his own tradeunion.
Determiners occur because of the modifier phrase which further specifies the meaning
of the indefinite NP. That is why examples of this kind are considered apparent
exceptions. The deep Subject is indefinite in deep structure and undergoes a
transformation of definitization as a result of its being modified by a clausal or nonclausal Noun Modifier.
56
Movement of the Subject NP into the VP. Relationally, this means that the deep
Insertion of the expletive THERE in the position left empty by the moved
sg
pl
a)
Are there three cats on the roof? (derived from the affirmation sentence)
There are three cats on the roof.
b)
In both a) and b) there behaves like a subject, i.e. it undergoes inversion with the verb
(in this case, existential be)
1. The occurrence of there as Subject in finite clauses (relative clauses in which the
realized constituent is not subject of the clause) and non-finite ones (infinitive,
participial or gerundial):
I eventually read the article about which there had been so many divergent
commentaries.
For there to be so much time left/bothers me.
There being so much time left bothers me.
2. Raising applies on sentences with seem and happen:
There seemed/ happen to be no one in the hall.
3. The behaviour of there is non-inverted so patterns:
John said there would be a commotion and so there was.
4. The behaviour of there is negative or restrictive emphatic sentences:
Never has there been such an opposition.
Hardly was there any time left.
If we compare the two patterns, we notice the [-stative] feature of the it construction
which makes use of the respective weather verb; as different from it the there
pattern in stative, it being predicated by the existential verb BE and its real subject
being the nominalized weather verb/ a heavy frost.
It sentences with complement clauses may also have two variants:
It is possible for them not to know the whole truth =><= It is no use doing this
=><= There is no use doing this.
There is a/ the possibility of their not knowing the whole truth.
There sentences may also contain gerundial clauses introduced by prepositions, such
as:
There is no use/ good in saying/ of your saying such a thing.
THERE in Complex S
There occurs as a Subject not only in simple sentences, but also in Complex ones.
Thus, starting from the deep structure:
[An accident to have been in the street] seemed.
We can obtain, after There-Insertion in the embedded Subject Clause, and Raising of
the formal Subject there:
There seemed to have been an accident in the street.
A similar surface structure results if we start from deep string predicated by transitive
V-s than allow S/O Raising:
Someone believed [an accident to have been in the street]
We shall obtain the following surface string after There Insertion in the DO Clause,
Raising and Passivization:
There was believed to have been an accident in the street.
59
2.
PNP-s may also occur at Sentence or VB level as free, therefore, optional adjuncts (the
Indirect Object functioning as Sentence Dative, or Prepositional Objects, as well as
Adverbial Modifiers whose NP is governed by a meaningful preposition.
In pre-theoretical grammars the Direct Object was frequently labeled as Accusative
Object. Despite this label, Curme, for instance, points out that the form (case) markers
are irrelevant for this function, as in: They chose him (acc.) king; versus They chose
him (dat.) a wife. Therefore, morphologically, the only distinction recoverable is that
between the nominative pronominal forms and the objective forms.
Semantically, the Direct Object is said to express the goal, the real object of the
activity, or the thing representing the goal.
The former corresponds to affected object (the object affected by the activity) and the
latter to the effected object (the real object of the activity, i.e. its result).
60
61
62
The old dative used as a single object expressed a person as involved in an activity
directed toward him. The accusative object used to denote a person or thing affected by
a certain activity. The formal differences between the two cases were gradually leveled
down, so that verbs that used to govern the dative, among which advise, believe, help,
injure, oppose, please, serve came to be used with an accusative object.
The dative object survived with verbs that select a personal object like apologize,
complain, occur/ come to smbs mind, belong, pertain to smb, remain, fall to smb. The
dative NP used with these verbs is considered to function as a special kind of Indirect
Object.
Considering the Indirect Object function, three distinctions are commonly made,
namely:
1).The Dative of Reference The Object denotes in this case a personal point of
view with respect to the prepositional content of the sentence. The dative case is used
with the noun which takes in its scope the whole sentence, and which designates the
referent for which the statement holds true.
a. For him, to submit would be quite shameful.
b. To me, he is a great hero.
c. That is nothing to her.
a. The fact seemed incredible to me.
b. It looks to me as if the shirt is too long.
In (a) BE is completely asemantic, while in b) it is a near synonym of transitives like to
mean or to represent. These verbs take an Experience which occurs as a Dative Object.
In the second set, the predicates are verbs of seeming or of sense perception which,
like mean take an Experience that occurs as a to Dative Object.
1)
English Noun Phrase in the Dative case may also express the person to whose
advantage or disadvantage an action takes place.
The for NP Object is more frequently used to express advantageous events:
His heart beat for all humanity.
To Objects occur with both semantic values. Sometimes, from is used to express clearly
the idea of disadvantage.
He stole the purse from the old woman.
63
This is a prepositionless form which was by far more frequent in older Engl. than it is
used today. It denotes the person who is likely to have an emotional or sympathetic
interest in the respective statement:
Now heed me what I say.
This usage is very limited
b)
I.O
D.O
DO
Dative is also ordered as to the Passive rule. The I.O. is promoted as subject of
sentence. The preposition does not appear in the passive string.
64
67
Despite its important syntactic aspects, the Passive Voice was included into the
Morphology of Grammar, although the criteria and topics were not purely
morphological. One can find in Scholarly traditional Grammars the approach of the
following problems connected with the Passive:
=> the description of the change brought about by Passivization in semanticosyntactic structure of the sentence in terms of a turning of the 'logical Object' of
sentence into its 'grammatical Subject' also called 'inverted Object'.
The logical Subject becomes a prepositional adjunct of the predicate labelled as
'inverted' or 'converted' Subject. By 'logical', they mean the functioning as Subject of
the sentence of the Noun expressing the performer of the action.
The traditional approach is still valuable for the intuition of the process-like character
of Passivization, as well as for the discussion of a very rich corpus of passive contexts.
necessarily requiring the expossion of its author in surface structure. In the third
sentence, the presence of the agentive by Phrase is redundant, making the whole string
hardly acceptable.
Agentive Passives
The marker of agency in present-day English is the preposition by, which also surfaces
in nominalized phrases of the form: the delivery of the message by an unknown person.
Other agentive prepositions used to compete with by in older English, among which of,
through, with and in.
The preposition of was the ordinary agency marker, while through and by were used
with an instrumental meaning. In present-day English, we still find some survivals of
the use of the above Prepositions Object. They are mostly characteristic of highly
literary style.
'OF' is used infrequently (and only in the above mentioned style) with some classes of
stative experience verbs (to be admired/ loved/ hated/ honoured/ understood of smb; to
be seen/ observed of smb). It is used in current English after born, when it indicates the
source of origin:
There was a boy born of our marriage eight months after I left you.
'WITH' occurs with a type of instrumental meaning in passive sentences:
The Minister was met with opposition.
'IN' has a quasi - agentive meaning
We were caught in the rain.
The chair was covered in black leather.
'FROM' may occur as a close alternative to by, indicating the source or origin.
We listened to a speech by/ from the Prime Minister.
'TO' is used with the verb to know:
She is known to me.
Agentless Passives
Language uses resort to agentless sentences in the following main circumstances:
1.
In
case
the
identity
of
the
Agent
is
unknown
70
to
the
speaker:
71
Sentence Coordination
Coordination is one of the most productive processes of forming complex structures
by putting together constituents of equal rank and joining them by coordinating con
junctions. Coordination results in compound constituents:
a). compound sentences (the constituents of the coordination are sentences);
b). compound phrase (the constituents of the coordination are phrases);
c). Bill saw Jane and greeted her. (VP coord.);
d). Grandpa is old and hard of hearing. (AP coord.);
e). We have linguistics classes on Monday morning and on Friday afternoon.
(Prep. P coord.)
GT grammars have introduced the term conjoining (Chomsky, 1957). Each member
of the coordination was called a conjunct.
The equal status and the independence of the conjunct sentences is reflected in the
fact that each conjunct is directly dominated by the node S, as different from
subordinate sentences which are dominated by a node different from S.
72
contrast with adverbs, they do not determine or modify other parts of speech they
are just form words.
From the point of view of composition, conjunctions are:
a). Simple: for, when, I, since;
b). Composed: whereas;
c). Complex: as though/ if, as soon as (these are formed o two conjunctions or
combinations of conjunctions with adverbs).
d) Conjunctional phrases: seeing that, in order that
e) Correlative conjunctions, between which various parts of speech or parts of the
sentence are placed: eitheror, no soonerthan
Classification of Coordinative Conjunctions
Coordinating Conjunctions link two parts of the sentence having the same syntactic
function or two homogenous clauses. They are:
a). Copulative: and, not onlybut also, as well as, no less than.
b). Disjunctive: eitheror, or, neithernor, otherwise, else, or else.
c). Adversative: but, and, whereas, while.
Quirk shows that there is a gradient from pure coordinators: and, or, but to pure
subordinator, if, although and conjuncts.
Properties relevant for the gradient:
a) A clause beginning with a coordinator or a conjunct (yet, or, nevertheless, etc) is
sequentially fixed in relation to the previous clause and hence cannot be moved to a
position in front of the clause. In contrast, subordinators allow an order change of the
two clauses:
They are living in England or they are spending a vacation there, they are
living there.
*Or they are spending a vacation there, they re living there.
73
Correlative Conjunctions
The rule of conjunction spreading inserts a copy of the conjunction in front of each
conjunct except for the first. In fact, the place of the initial conjunct conjunction is not
74
always empty; it may be held by a distributive quantifier: neither, both, all, each, or
by a distributive adverb: alike, equally, not only, respectively, at once.
I neither love, nor hate him.
He addressed his observations not only to the guests, but to the domestics who
waited at table.
I was equally duped and betrayed.
Such combinations of quantifiers or adverbs and conjunctions have been traditionally
studied under the name of correlative conjunctions: neithernor, eitheror, both
and, not onlybut, alikeand, equallyand, at onceand.
Correlative conjunctions are best viewed as discontinuous elements. The choice of a
particular distributive Quant./ Adv. Depends on the choice of the conjunction:
75
Coordinators may also differ with respect to the number and type of conjuncts they
may link. But may not link more than two conjuncts.
This restriction does not apply to not onlybut.
*John will sing, but Bill will dance, but Peter will play the piano.
Not only Petebut Bill also came.
76
77
In the case of neither, nor, prescriptive grammars recommend agreement as in the case
of eitheror. However, the verb is often found in the plural with neithernor.
Neither he nor his wife have arrived.
Expressions like as well as, as much as, rather than, more than, no less than, together
with are not coordinating conjunctions, but prepositional phrases or connective
adverbs and consequently, they do not influence agreement rules.
The Minister, as well as/ rather than/ as much as the Trade unions is
responsible for the present impasse.
78
Complementation
A sentence is said to be called Complex when it contains another sentence as one of
its constitutive parts. The constituent clause is called a subordinate clause, while the
containing clause is referred to as the main clause.
John believes [that it will rain soon]
John [who is tall] can play basketball [whenever he likes]
A subordinate clause may be an immediate constituent of the main clause or it may be
an immediate constituent of one of the constituents of the main clause. Embedded
(subordinate) clauses fall into several categories defined in terms of:
a) the type of connector which introduces them (e.g. a subordination conjunction:
although, if etc, a relative pronoun or adverb: who, whenever etc).
b) the structural configuration within which the embedded clause is introduced.
Complement clauses are embedded clauses which replace NPs taking over their
syntactic functions. Complement clauses are introduced by a limited set of
subordinating particles called complementizers: THAT, FOR-TO etc.
That he gave that heirloom to me was a shock to everybody. (That
complement)
For him to give that heirloom to me was a shock to everybody. (infinitive For
to complement).
When how unwillingly to gave that heirloom to me everybody remembers.
(indirect question complement).
79
Him/ Max giving that heirloom to me caused his wife a heart attack. (half
gerund complement or ACC ing complement).
His/ Maxs giving that heirloom to me caused his wife a heart attack. (full
gerund complement or Poss. ing complement.
His giving of a necklace to his wife was meant to patch up things. (verbal noun
or proper nominalization).
THAT Complement Clauses
Major syntactic properties of THAT Complements
Complement Clauses occur in all deep structure positions of NPs and they enter into
most of the functional relations of NPs: Subject, Direct Object, Prepositional Object,
Predicative, Attributive, Adverbial. THAT clauses pronominalize like NPs: pro-nouns
like it, that stand for NPs as well as clauses.
Columbus demonstrated that theorem.
What Columbus demonstrated is that theorem.
Columbus demonstrated that the world is not flat.
What Columbus demonstrated is that the world is not flat.
81
Extraposition also appears to behave exceptionally with respect to subject and object
complements of so-called bisentential verbs like: prove, show, indicate, imply,
suggest, mean, entail etc.
These verbs accept sentential constituents as both subject and object:
[That his finger-prints were on my throat] shows/ suggests/ proves/ means/
implies [that he is unfond of me.]
*It shows [that he is unfond of me] [that his finger-prints were on my throat.]
Complex NP Shift is another very general rule of English.
Bill knows very well that he should do it tomorrow.
Complex NP Shift moves the D.O. only. This transformation does not apply to
subjects:
Mary destroyed the car which she had bought completely.
Mary destroyed completely the car which she had bought. (movement of
complex NP)
He talked to many of my best friends about their stupidity.
He talked about their stupidity to many of my best friends. (movement of a
complex PP)
82
With some verbs like: think, believe, imagine, suppose, see, hear, know, remember,
understand, that deletion applies: I think/ suppose he will come in time.
There is a second subcategory of verbs which take, in addition to a clausal D.O, an
I.O or P.O.
Verbs that take a to I.O. They are mostly communicative verbs, which may undergo
Dative Movement: tell, read, write, suggest, remark, represent. Other verbs: permit,
allow, promise, swear, indicate.
She promised him that shed never lie to him again.
They telegraphed us that father had lied.
The Clausal D.O. may be passivized before Dative Movement:
They suggested a good solution to us.
A good solution was suggested to us by them.
In addition to the subclass of Dative Movement verbs, these are verbs that take a
clausal D.O and a personal P.O: ask, blame, beg, request, require:
He blamed the accident on me.
He blamed it on me that we had had an accident.
I begged of them that I may be allowed to go.
That clauses often represent underlying prepositional Objects, which undergo
Preposition Deletion: admit (of), ask (for), answer (for), marvel (at), see (to), worry
(about), wonder (at, about), swear (to), conceive (of), decide (on), insist (up/ on),
hope (for), learn (of, about).
Can you swear that the accused man was at your home al Friday night?
83
advise^NP^of,
instruct^NP^in,
warn^NP^of,
accuse
^NP^of,
inform^NP^of,
persuade^NP^of
He informed the manager that we are willing to work overtime.
I assume you sincerely that there is no such possibility.
Most frequently that clauses originate in a prepositional phrase governed by an
adjective: afraid (of), alarmed (at), annoyed (at), concerned (about), happy (about),
delighted (at), sorry (for), thankful (for), surprised (at):
Are you aware that you are sitting on my hat?
You should be thankful that you are alive.
That-Clauses as Subjects with several predicate subclasses: seem, appear, happen,
turn out, came about.
It appeared that I had run out of whiskey again.
It seemed she had simply forgotten about Georgie.
Some of these verbs may also take a [+personal] I.O.
He felt a new respect for Miss Carter, and it occurred to him for the first time
that he liked her.
A considerable number of adjectives take sentential subjects: likely, contain, true,
possible, doubtful, helpful, essential, evident.
It was also evident to me that I had not yet accepted that I lost her.
Nouns can also be used in this pattern: problem, thing, idea, fact, miracle, wonder,
illusion.
84
85
Traditional grammars often mention the fact that there are complements taking
predicates which require or allow the use of the subjunctive in their complement
clauses. Among the verbs which require the use of the subjunctive (analytical with
should in BE and synthetic in AE) the following are frequently quoted: order,
demand, require, ask, insist, agree, arrange, recommend, propose, suggest.
He demands that new solutions should be sought.
There are two ways in analyzing the subjunctive in finite Complement clauses.
There is first, a purely syntactic approach to the matter. The Subjunctive is viewed in
terms of verbal government as a mark of subordination. The Subjunctive is not
supposed to have independent meaning or significance. The choice of the Subjunctive
strictly depends on certain matrix verbs marked in the lexicon for [+subjunctive] or
[+- subjunctive].
I wish that it be so.
I order that everybody stand up.
There is also a second semantic approach to the problem. This approach stands from
the assumption that the subjunctive mood has a specific meaning, distinct from the
meaning of the indicative. The distribution of the subjunctive is analyzable in terms of
its meaning in the sense that the subjunctive is selected by those matrix verbs that are
semantically compatible with subjunctive meaning.
86
87
88
89
Infinitive Complements
Infinitive constructions represent a complex, diversified type of embedded sentences.
As with That complements, the NP position in the sentence is filled out by a sentence
constituent, i.e. an infinitive construction. The characteristic marker of an infinitive
construction is the complementizer to, with several variants: for-to, to.
It now remains for the scientist to analyze all evidence they have acquired.
Russians have always expected their novelists to produce the political
nonsense of their time.
The conversion of sentences into infinitive constructions entails important
modifications in the form of the complement. The most important change that the
sentence suffers is the loss of tense distinctions. Tense is an obligatory constituent of
independent sentences, loss of tense is a powerful indication of subordination and
nominalization of the sentence.
The infinitive complement is thus a non-finite clause. The auxiliary constituent
retains, however, all aspectual distinctions:
To have done so on consecutive nights was a triumph indeed.
They are known to be doing so by kind permission of the Chief Constable.
He had expected her to have been reading at the time.
90
2) The infinitive clause may lose its subject by means of Deletion Rules: the
complement subject may be co-referential with some NP called Equivalent NP
Deletion.
They may have forgotten to answer the invitation.
3) The complement subject may be semantically indefinite, underlying deletion under
indefiniteness (The rule of One Deletion).
To see is to believe.
4) The infinitive clause retains its subject, but the complement subject becomes a
member of the matrix clause where its functions as subject or object. This is the case
of Acc with Infinitive or Nominative with Infinitive construction.
I saw him cross the street. (Acc + Inf)
He seems to be tired. (Nom + Inf)
91
92
93
94
95
Another class of raisers is that of verbs of liking and disliking: love, like, prefer,
wish, desire, intend.
I dont like women to smoke. (Acc + Inf)
Of course I would prefer you to enjoy yourself.
Mister X wished the tree cut down. (Acc + Past Participle)
The last important class of SOR triggers includes verbs of physical perception: see,
hear, overhear, watch, feel, find, notice.
We saw John cross the street. (Acc + Inf)
I watched her entering. (Acc + Present Participle)
Ive heard it said. (Acc + Past Participle)
I saw him led through the hall. (Acc + Past Participle)
Subject to Subject Raising: (these are cases when the raised subject becomes subject
of the matrix)
Active verbs and adjectives which accept Nominative + Inf. Constr.: seem, happen,
appear, turn out, likely, sure, certain.
He happens to know English.
Are they likely to have heard the announcement?
Some of these verbs may govern to be deletion and this occurs in the Nominative +
Subject Complement Pattern.
He seems tired. (Noun + Subject Complement)
He appeared ignorant.
Intransitive verbs that trigger SSR:
a) inchoative verbs: become, grow, remain, go, stay.
There came to be twenty families in the valley. ( Nominative + Inf)
96
ING Complementation
In addition to that and for-to English processes another complementizer ing,
occurent in a wide variety of syntactic structures.
Traditional grammars acknowledge the existence of at least two homonymous ing
forms:
a) Gerunds, defined as forms that have both substantival and verbal features, both
aspect of the content being often apparent in the same context.
Their cruelly shooting the doves.
b) Present Participles which have verbal features exclusively and thus differ from
gerunds.
John is writing.
Although not knowing English, I enjoyed my trip to England.
I saw the running child.
I recognized the man coming to my house.
97
Gerunds were further subdivided into gerunds proper or verbal gerunds and verbal
nouns or nominal gerunds, the latter differing from the former in that they have only
nominal features.
Their cruel shooting of the doves.
Participles appear to be derived transformationally:
Although not knowing English, I enjoyed my trip to England.
[Although I did not know English, I]
I recognized the man coming to my house.
[The man who was coming to my house]
When it is the outcome of sentence transformation the participle has the distribution
of a noun modifier (attribute) or verb modifier (adverbial).
In I saw the running child, the participle functions as a verbal adjective. So the present
participles do not constitute a homogenous derivational class, because some
participles are basic, while others are derived constituents.
A more detailed syntactic analyses of verbal gerunds is bound to identify the gerundial
constructions: an older one, whose subject is a possessive form called Poss. Ing
complement: Who objected to their coming here? And the more recent construction
whose subject is an Accusative form, called Acc- Ing Complement: Who objected to
them coming here?
Comparison between gerunds (verbal gerunds) and verbal nouns (nominal gerunds)
The auxiliary, like infinitive, Acc-Ing and Poss-Ing complements maintain aspectual
distinctions, in contrast, nominal gerunds, have no auxiliary constituent at all (this
suggests that they are not sentences).
John resold the book before reading it. =>>
98
=>> Johns having resold the book before reading it. (verbal gerund)
=>>*Johns having resold of the book before reading it. (nominal gerund)
=>> Johns selling of the book before reading it. (nominal gerund)
=>> Johns resale of the book before reading it. (nominal gerund)
The subject of verbal gerunds suffers modifications, it takes the Acc or the Poss. form.
It all depends on him/ John coming in time.
In the case of gerund constructions, the possessive cannot be transformed into an ofphrase (this is possible only with verbal nouns).
John is approaching slowly => *The approaching slowly of John.
Johns slow coming => The slow coming of John.
Verbal gerunds accept sentence negation by not while verbal nouns and
nominalizations do not.
Her not preparing dinner is good for her health. (verbal gerund)
*Her not preparing of the dinner/ her not preparation of the dinner is good for
health. (verbal noun)
With nominalization, negation is always incorporated occurring either in the
determiner of the nominalized form or in some object of the nominalization:
99
100
I must object to this witness being allowed to enter the box. Acc
He insisted on his sisters accepting the invitation. Acc
I feel rather afraid of his doing to much again. Poss.
I am not surprised at your being glad to get rid of such a habit. Poss.
The subject is co-referential with some NP in the matrix and is deleted by Equi. The
controller may have any function:
Subject: I am glad of having met you.
D.O.: I congratulate you for assembling here.
I.O. / P.O.: I hope you are not angry with me for coming
101
Most verbs accept different subjects in the matrix and complement clause, and then
the subject assumes Possessive and Accusative form:
Poss. ing: Youll excuse my asking again.
I dont mind his coming whenever he likes.
Acc ing: I cannot help the dreams coming.
The parents did not mind the news becoming public.
Do you mind the windows being open?
Verbs like deny, postpone, risk, allow only a Poss. ing complement:
I couldnt deny *him having made a reasonable excuse.
I couldnt deny his having made a reasonable excuse.
Verbs followed either by ing or infinitive complements.
a) There is a first class of verbs showing little or no meaning difference between the
infinitive and the gerund complement: afford, attempt, decline, fear, neglect, fail,
plan, intend
*It is needless to attempt describing the particular character of young people.
I dont attempt to strike out anything now.
One should also include in this class the few aspectual verbs that govern both
infinitives and gerunds: begin, start, commence, continue, cease; still, each of the
complements may convey specific shades meaning: In general the to + V
constructions has future orientated and generic reading (repetition of the event).
V ing constructions have present or past readings
That never ceased to amaze me.
*amazing me.
He started reading an article, reprinted from the Times.
102
b) The same difference is relevant in case of verbs of liking and disliking: like, dislike,
love, adore, detest, prefer:
to V => a definite single future event: I love to hear you sing.
V ing => conveys a generic sentence or activity, habit: I love playing the
piano.
c) There is a large class of verbs which must take an infinitive when there is an object
in the matrix. If there is no personal object in the sentence, then the verbs take ing
complements: allow, permit, admire, suggest, propose, suffer, forbid, urge.
I allow Tom to smoke.
I allowed smoking in the room.
I suggested to them to bring the meeting to an end.
I suggested bringing the meeting to an end.
d) The verbs remember, recollect, recall, report, observe, perceive, notice are nonfactive in the Acc + inf. Constructions, but have a factive interpretation when used
with gerund complements:
They reported the enemy to have suffered a decisive defeat. (Acc + Inf)
They reported the enemys having suffered a decision defeat (gerund).
I remembered him to be bald so I was surprised to see him with long hair.
I remembered his being bald so I bought a wig and disguised him.
The infinitive is understood as simultaneous or future with respect to the main clause:
I didnt remember to post the letter so I still have it with me.
In contrast, the gerund factualizes the event which may be understood as past even if
it is not marked so.
They resent his being away.
103
104
105
106
107
There are also adjectives that may be attended by a non-prepositional gerund: busy,
near, worth.
She was too busy helping people in distress.
She is not worth trying on.
Gerunds Complements may function as Predicates:
His main extravagance is smoking cigars.
Seeing is believing.
Poss. ing and Acc ing complements may function as Attributes:
She was a little cool about the idea of being taken as his secretary.
There was no point in being there.
She really resented the notion of entertaining guests.
Participial constructions
She stood gazing at the brightly lit shops windows. [Predicative]
She looked at the children playing in the garden. [Attributive]
She heard smb. knocking at the door. [Acc + Part.]
Arriving at the station, he started looking at his friend. [Partic. Predicative]
Having read the book, he was able to comment on it. [Perf. Partic. Adverbial
of Cause]
I saw the running child. [Verbal adjective Attribute]
All sleeping children are beautiful [Verbal adj. Attribute]
The things not wanted were given away. [Past Participle Predicative]
There are portraits of wanted persons. [Verbal adj. Attribute]
There is the Lost Property Office. [Verbal adj. Attribute]
108
109
Relative Clauses
Relative clauses constitute a class of embedded clauses which are members of NPs
and where subordination crucially depends on the fact that matrix and the subordinate
clause share a co-referential NP.
There is a great variety of Relation Clauses which can be classified in terms of their
form and/ or their meaning.
1) We may classify Relative Clauses according to two main criteria: whether or not
the antecedent of the RC is present in the surface structure and from this point of view
we can distinguish:
a) RCs with expressed antecedents (dependent RCs)
Uneasy lays the head that wears the crown.
Here sleeps in peace a Hampshire grenadier.
b) RCs without expressed antecedent, also called free RCs.
110
111
For the same reason personal pronouns of the first and second or even of the third
person do not take RRCls. The third person pronouns are usually replaced by the one
who, those who; personal pronouns, which are not used as determiners, are replaced
by forms which can function as determiners in the surface structure: many people
=>> many who.
RRCls are not sensitive to the determiner of the antecedent (the word to which the
relative clause relates, which may be [+ -definite]), but the reverse takes place. The
determiner of the antecedent is sensitive to RRCls in that it becomes [+Definite] (an
instance of the cataphoric use of the definite article).
Milk is good.
*The milk is good.
The milk which you bought yesterday was good.
RRCls are introduced by relative pronouns: which, who, that, and by relative adverbs:
where, when etc.
RRCs are not separated from the antecedent by commas in writing, nor by a pause in
speech.
Not all wh-words can function as relative pronouns in RRCls. In particular, one
cannot use what, which is an indefinite pronoun; the pronoun which has to be used
instead.
The book *what you have read.
The book which you have read.
What is an indefinite pronoun (which can never become definite), while which is
inherently definite.
Other interrogative formatives: who, where, when etc. are definite, but can become
definite in certain contexts: Who else was there? [-Def]
Who do you want to see? [+Def]
112
What is [-Def]; which is [+Def], who, where etc. are [+- Def]. In order to account for
the use of which instead of what we assume that before the relative pronoun is
lexically specified, there applies a transformation that assigns the syntactic feature
[+Def] to the determiner of the constituent sentence.
This is Constituent Definitization Transformation and it reflects the anaphoric relation
binding the antecedent and the relative pronoun, a relation which is guaranteed by the
co-reference condition.
If the antecedent determiner appears without a noun, functioning as a pronoun, the
antecedent noun can be deleted, either because it is a pro-form or because it is
identical with some other proceeding noun in the discourse. The following
determiners allow Noun Deletion: many, much, few, little, some, others, all, any.
Thats all I got. There are many who believe it.
When, while, where, why function as relative adverbs. Their antecedents are nouns
which name places, time etc. In the relative clause, where, when, why pronominalize
prepositional phrases with adverbial function:
114
It is often said that in English one can delete the relative pronoun which is not a
subject, which is not preceded by a preposition:
The man [that] Henry spoke to is a thief.
Most English grammars that have dealt with such clauses have placed them in the
category of relative clauses (a notable exception is Curme who treats them under
Subject Clauses or Object Clauses, without assigning them any categorial status).
In Free Relative Clauses, English uses, in addition to simple relative pronouns and
adverbs, a class of compound relative pronouns and adverbs:
Simple forms: who, what, where, when.
In present day English, who meaning the one who or anyone who is no longer current,
being replaced by whoever.
Whoever/ who she spoke to misunderstood her.
Compound ever-forms: whoever, whatever, whichever, wherever, whenever, however:
Go wherever you like.
Whoever is seldom inflected: Ask whoever you meet.
115
The genitive whosever is highly infrequent: Whosever it is, I mean to have it.
Whoevers is found in colloquial style.
Compound so-ever forms are less frequent and belong to rhetorical language.
Although these classes lack antecedents in the surface structure, there are compelling
syntactic and semantic arguments for positing a dummy antecedent in their underlying
structure.
The first syntactic argument is number agreement of the verb in the main clause:
That he won and that you lost is/ *are truly amazing.
What would be virtues in a Christian are vices in a pagan.
What may be and must be is.
The second syntactic argument is the pronominalization phenomenon. In contrast with
that complement clauses, which are pronominalized by typical pro-sentence forms (it,
so), FRCls are pronominalized by ordinary personal or demonstrative pronouns and
there is gender and number agreement with the antecedent.
It cant have been true that Tom had been killed and you shouldnt have
believed it.
Whoever told you that Tom had been killed was lying and you shouldnt have
believed him.
We conclude that FRCls have underlying antecedents, and thus belong to the class of
RCls. The syntax of FRCls is in all respects similar to the syntax of RRCls, but there
is an additional transformation which deletes the antecedent. For this transformation
we should take into consideration the following things:
The grammar should guarantee that only appropriate wh-forms are used in
FRCls and RRCls.
116
The set of relative pronouns used in FRCls only partly overlaps the set of
forms used in RRCls. In FRCls: what, who.
Which is an inherently [+Def] pronoun and it is used in FRCls, but not in RRCls. So
wh-words used in FRCls are inherently indefinite, and cannot become definite as a
consequence of an anaphoric relation with the antecedent, because the latter is
deleted.
The choice of the relative pronoun in FRCls is partly depended on the determiner of
the implicit antecedent. The simple forms what, who are associated with underlying
structures containing the definite article in any of its uses: referential, attributive,
generic, and an underlying universal quantifier any used attributively.
Show me what you are holding in your hand. (the thing)
Speak about what book you liked best. (the book attributive)
Who steals my purse steals trash. (anyone who generic use)
Dear poet, dont you know that I say whatever you say. (anything)
The last remark concerns the identical nominal of the RC. This nominal is either a
noun with full lexical content (doll, girl etc) or a noun of very general meaning
belonging to the limited class of Pro-forms: thing, person, nouns which can be
deleted. Nouns of full lexical meaning are retained in the SS.
I said what words of comfort I could.
Pro-form nouns are deletable in virtue of their very general meaning:
What he was reading was interesting. (the stuff)
Do what you like.
The derivation shows that in the SS the clause assumes the function of the deleted
antecedent, so the FRC is a subject clause. Within the RC, the relative constituent may
perform any functions.
Subject: Who steals my purse steals trash.
117
118
In a NRRC, it is almost a general rule for the preposition to come before the relative
pronoun.
The new hospital, in which the Queen has taken a great personal interest, will
be officially opened in March.
The headmaster, with whom the parents had discussed their sons feature,
advised the boy to take up engineering.
One important exception is the verb + preposition combinations:
I can assume you that David is a man you can absolutely depend on.
119
Adverbial Clauses
Adverbial Clauses fall into several semantic classes.
Adverbial Clauses of Time: I must write my exercise before going to bed. I was there
when he came. Whenever I feel any doubt, I inquire.
Adverbial Clauses of Place: They went wherever they could find work. He would live
with grandmother anywhere she liked.
Adverbial Clauses of Condition
Real Conditional Clauses (Indicative Conditional Clauses)
He must be lying if he told you that.
Provided that no objection is raised we shall hold the meeting here.
Unreal Conditional Clauses (Subjunctive Conditional Clauses)
120
121
Bibliography:
Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1965
Cornilescu, A., Concepts of Modern Grammar, Bucharest University Press,
Bucharest, 1996
Cornilescu, A., English Syntax, Vol 2, TUB, 1984
Cornilescu, A., Iclezan Dimitriu, I., Accuracy and Fluency, Institutul European, Iasi,
1996
Cornilescu, A., The Transformational Syntax of English. The Complex Sentence,
Bucuresti: TUB, 1976
Crainiceanu, I., Elements of English Morphology, Editura Fundatiei Romania de
Maine, Bucuresti, 2007
Curme, G., Syntax, New York: Academic Press, 1976
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. A Grammar of Contemporary
English. London: Longman, 1972
122
Serban, D, Hatagan, R and Moisescu, D., English Syntax Workbook, Editura Fundatiei
Romania de Maine Bucuresti, 2004
Serban, D. English Syntax, Bucuresti: TUB, 1982
Serban, D., The Syntax of English Predications, Editura Fundatiei Romania de Maine,
Bucuresti, 2006
123