Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
KEYWORDS
Hypospadias;
Diverticula;
Complication;
Stricture
82
Introduction
Urethral diverticula can be congenital or acquired;
the most common cause of an acquired diverticulum in children is previous hypospadias repair. The
reported incidence of diverticula formation after
hypospadias repair is 0e21% [1]. Factors increasing
the risk of diverticula include a proximal defect,
use of poorly supported tissue for interposition
grafting (e.g. bladder mucosa or tubularized pedicle grafts), and the presence of a distal stricture
resulting in relative obstruction/higher outlet
pressures [2].
We reviewed our experience with hypospadias
complications over the past 18 years, identifying
patients with diverticula, analysing factors associated with this complication, and examining the
management and outcome.
Results
There were 123 patients with complications after
initial hypospadias repair; the most common complication was urethrocutaneous fistula and the
distribution of complications is shown in Table 1.
The mean age of the 13 patients with diverticula
was 3.0 years at the primary repair, and for the
diverticula repair was 5.7 years. The mean interval
from initial operation to repair of the diverticulum
was 1.4 years (for patients whose initial operation
was at our institution). The opening was proximal/
perineal in 11 of 13 children with diverticula, in
contrast to fistula, strictures and other complications, which were more evenly divided between
proximal, middle and distal. Diverticula were
strongly associated with more severe hypospadias
variants. Fistula, the most common complication,
was relatively independent of the severity of the
defect.
Hypospadias, n (%)
Proximal
Middle
Distal
11
29 (26)
23
5
4
1
46 (42)
30
4
5
1
35 (32)
20
3
4
Discussion
Diverticula account for 11% of all complications
after hypospadias repair in the present series,
similar to the values in previous reports [1]. This
complication appears to correlate with the severity of the underlying defect; most patients with
a diverticulum had a perineal/proximal anatomic
defect.
There may be a causal association between
stricture and diverticula [3e5] but this was not
the case in the present series. Only one of 13
children with a diverticulum had a stricture, and
no diverticulum was present in 13 with a postoperative stricture. Possibly, the early detection
of stricture by routine calibration resulted in
recognition and treatment of the stricture before
the deleterious effects of long-term increased
voiding pressure and subsequent diverticulum formation.
Although not statistically significant, there was
a trend to a greater incidence of genitourinary
anomalies in patients who developed diverticula
(P Z 0.057). This correlation is probably explained
by a hidden covariant, in that diverticula were
more common in proximal hypospadias, and more
proximal defects are more likely to be associated
with other genitourinary anomalies.
Symptoms of diverticula include dribbling, infection and bulging of the anterior urethra with
voiding [5]. Although turbulent flow and stasis may
predispose to stone formation, this complication
83
was not seen in the present series. Lateral/oblique
views during a retrograde urethrogram will usually
show the abnormality [6]; cystoscopy is confirmatory.
It is important to exclude other abnormalities
such as distal stricture or fistula, as it was not
unusual to see more than one complication in the
same patient. We deferred repair of the diverticulum until R 6 months had elapsed from the time
of the primary repair. As diverticula tend to be
present late (a mean of 1.4 years in the present
series) this is not usually an issue.
In the absence of other complications, simple
partial excision with multilayer closure is sufficient. Other techniques have been reported,
depending on the presence or absence of other
complications such as stricture or fistula [3,7]. If
the anatomy permits, a pants over vest closure
may be used. Stents were used after repair of all
diverticula. Because such a large proportion of the
present patients were referred after a variety
of attempted repairs elsewhere, it is difficult to
determine the influence of stenting on the
development of diverticula. The overall results
were good, with 10 of 13 successful at a mean of 2
years follow-up.
References
[1] Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML, Vukadinovic VM,
Djakovic N. Pseudospongioplasty in the repair of a urethral
diverticulum. BJU Int 2004;94:126e30.
[2] Horton Jr CE, Horton CE. Complications of hypospadias
surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:371e9.
[3] Winslow BH, Vorstman B, Devine Jr CJ. Urethroplasty using
diverticular tissue. J Urol 1985;134:552e3.
[4] Secrest CL, Jordan GH, Winslow BH, Horton CE, McCraw JB,
Gilbert DA, et al. Repair of the complications of hypospadias surgery. J Urol 1993;150:1415e8.
[5] Retik AB, Atala A. Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol
Clin North Am 2002;29:329e39.
[6] Rimon U, Hertz M, Jonas P. Diverticula of the male urethra:
a review of 61 cases. Urol Radiol 1992;14:49e55.
[7] Zaontz MR, Kaplan WE, Maizels M. Surgical correction of
anterior urethral diverticula after hypospadias repair in
children. Urology 1989;33:40e2.