Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.elsevier.com/locate/polymer
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Polo II, Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal
b
Department of Biochemistry, NMR Center and Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Received 9 November 2004; accepted 16 December 2004
Available online 19 January 2005
Abstract
The basic catalysis of melamine with epichlorohydrin gives prepolymers that can be used in the preparation of energetic materials. In this
work, sodium hydroxide and triethylamine were used as catalysts and ethyleneglycol as initiator. Different reaction conditions were tested
and the characterization of the products was carried out by IR and NMR spectroscopy and MS spectrometry, hydroxyl groups content, vapour
pressure osmometry and elemental and thermal analysis. Epichlorohydrin reacts with the amine groups of melamine and forms lateral chains
with hydroxyl and epoxide end groups, which can be used for curing purposes. The two catalysts lead to similar products, confirmed both by
the structure and number of the lateral chains. The melamine/epichlorohydrin ratio was found important for the structure of the final
compounds. Chlorine atoms leave the molecules during reaction due to basic catalysis. In the light of the use of the prepolymers in energetic
materials, the presence of the 1,3,5-s-triazine ring and the lateral chains with end groups curable by e.g. isocyanates was accomplished with
success. However, the loss of chlorine atoms limits to a certain extent their possible substitution by energetic groups.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Prepolymer synthesis; Melamine; Epichlorohydrin
1. Introduction
In 1945 Ericks [1] patented a process claiming the
reaction of melamine with ethylene oxide (EO) or glycidol.
Basic catalysts like NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)2 or pyridine were
used. Kaiser [2] added a polyol with at least two hydroxyl
groups to produce similar compounds. Sodium and
potassium methoxides were also used as catalysts, using
temperatures between 150 and 200 8C. Kucharski [3]
studied the reaction between melamine and EO or propylene
oxide (PO) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), using
tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAH) as catalyst.
Lower reaction temperatures, 7095 8C, were employed.
Lubczak [4] used dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent.
Mixtures of different products were found, revealing
unequal side branches of the triazine ring.
It is well known that melamine derivatives also react with
oxiranes via anionic polymerization, with the catalyts TBAH
[5,6], triethylamine (TEA) [713], KOH, NaOH, sodium
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and equipment
1767
1768
Table 1
Reagents and respective amounts used in the syntheses of the prepolymers
MEC3
MEC4
MEC5
MEC8
MEC12
Melamine (mmol)
ECH (mmol)
EG (mmol)
NaOH (mmol)
39.679
39.689
396.36
396.36
396.36
396.36
79.272
39.630
8.5425
8.2525
8.2800
39.657
39.695
39.630
TEA (mmol)
DMF (ml)
19.396
19.396
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Fig. 1. IR (a) spectrum of MEC8 and (b) spectra of the prepolymers in the
range 1300700 cmK1.
MEC3
MEC4
MEC8
MEC12
1090/815
(Hydroxyl)
1050/815
(Ether)
3.03
2.57
2.31
1.18
3.23
2.72
2.32
0.93
HCl titration method for epoxides [10] was not tried because
of the expected significant amine interference.
Fig. 2 shows the 1H NMR spectra of DMSO-d6 solutions
of MEC3, MEC4, MEC8 and MEC12.
The peaks at 2.76, 2.92 (Fig. 2(a)) and at 7.96 ppm (not
shown) are assigned to the reaction solvent DMF which
could not be removed from the compounds even after some
weeks in vacuum oven at 40 8C and approximately 1 Pa.
Acetone shows a peak at 2.17 ppm [4] and the peak at
2.12 ppm can be attributed to remaining impurities. The
peak at 2.53 ppm is due to the residual protons of the
deuterated DMSO.
Fig. 2(a) shows signals at 1.18 and 1.23 ppm for MEC8
and MEC12 due to alkyl groups from the catalyst TEA. For
the synthesis of MEC3 and MEC4, NaOH was used as
catalyst, so these peaks were not observed. MEC8 was kept
two weeks at 100 8C under vacuum. The 1H NMR spectrum
of the DMSO-d6 solution of the compound obtained after
this treatment showed attenuated signals for DMF and no
signal for acetone but the signals attributed to TEA
remained unchanged (data not shown). This showed that
TEA is strongly bound to the prepolymer, probably through
H bonds. The incorporation of TEA by ionic interaction
between ionic chloride and ammonium cations in the
compound is not probable because it would lead to a peak
in the IR spectrum around 24002700 cmK1. As mentioned
before, the shoulder seen at 2650 cmK1 in MEC8 IR
spectrum is similar to the observed in the melamine
spectrum. Quaternary ammonium containing compounds
show a moderate to strong peak in IR spectra [22] and thus
this hypothesis is rejected. The thermal treatment of MEC8
also led to some degradation of the compound, observed by
weaker signals of amine and chloroalkyl groups in the 1H
NMR spectrum (data not shown).
In spite of all experimental care in the preparation of the
samples, water was absorbed from the surrounding
atmosphere due to high hygroscopicity of the compounds,
giving rise to a H2O signal at 3.33.5 ppm observed in Fig.
2(b). In the case of MEC3 this signal was so intense that a
saturation frequency at 3.50 ppm was required during the
acquisition of the 1H NMR spectrum to suppress the H2O
signal. The assignment of this signal was confirmed by
adding increasing amounts of H2O to 600 ml of a MEC8
solution in DMSO-d6. In this case, the H2O signal shifted
from 3.39 ppm in the DMSO-d6 solution to 4.12 ppm after
the addition of 200 ml of H2O (data not shown).
MEC3, MEC4 and MEC8 show similar spectral features
in this region (Fig. 2(b)). Broad peaks are observed due to
the protons of the lateral chains formed from ECH. This
means that these lateral chains formed on the melamine
molecule have similar structures in the three compounds.
The absence of specific peaks due to EG fragment in MEC3
can be attributed to a side reaction between EG and ECH,
leading to the formation of low molecular weight polyepichlorohydrin removed in the purification step [23]. The
peaks at 3.273.29, 3.68 and 4.15 ppm for MEC8 are
1769
narrower than the ones for MEC3 and MEC4 (not very clear
in Fig. 2(b)). However, the differences are not relevant. In
the spectrum of MEC12, a more intense and narrower signal
is observed at 4.15 ppm, the signal at 3.93 ppm is absent,
the one at 3.68 ppm is much less intense and the signals at
1770
MEC3
MEC4
MEC8
MEC12
NH2
mol NH2 /mol
NH
mol NH/mol
No. of branches
0.44G0.02
0.31G0.05
0.38G0.04
0.88G0.03
0.21G0.07
0.59G0.11
0.44G0.06
0.29G0.03
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.0
some weak couplings, e.g. 5.45 with 3.66 and 3.46 with
3.68 ppm.
The lateral chains can be composed by the addition of
more than one ECH molecule, leading to the structure in
Fig. 4(c), which is supported by the couplings between the
1771
1772
Phthalic anhydride/
imidazol (%)
8.55G0.67
7.07G1.20
13.96G0.26
14.23G0.64
1773
Table 5
Elemental analysis results
MEC3
MEC4
MEC5
MEC8
MEC12
a
b
Oa
Clb
42.546G1.572
41.956G2.885
44.956G1.872
45.222G3.595
45.162G0.454
7.331G0.224
7.267G0.496
7.812G0.367
6.902G0.956
7.655G0.388
12.272G1.246
13.273G3.307
3.734G0.214
13.865G2.774
22.876G0.609
20.868G1.623
20.002G1.234
26.039G1.313
20.843G0.799
18.689G0.833
9.09G0.16
8.10G0.019
7.69G0.18
8.29G0.019
7.70G0.32
obtained. This result indicates that ECH reacted preferentially with the already formed oligomers, and unreacted
melamine was present at the end of the reaction.
The comparison of M/ECH values with the number of
branches calculated by NMR analysis show that for MEC3,
MEC4 and MEC8 the average number of ECH per branch is
1.6 to 1.7.
The loss of chlorine atoms can be seen in the number of
ECH molecules with chlorine (see values in M/ECH with
chlorine column in Table 6).
Chlorine loss is attributed to the basic catalysts. The
hydrolysis of CH2Cl groups gives CH2OH, with the
deactivation of the catalyst. The number of moles of OH
groups per mole of MEC8 can be calculated from %OH and
molar mass values, resulting in 2.8. This result is higher than
the number of moles of ECH with chlorine, indicating that
hydrolysis may have taken place. The formation of epoxide
bonds from OH and CH2Cl end groups occurred, as shown
by NMR studies, with loss of chlorine. ECH can also behave
as a trifunctional monomer [25], where the chlorine leaves
the molecule and crosslinking can occur. In the initiation,
after opening of the epoxide group of ECH, an intramolecular attack of the negative alkoxide ion to the carbon
attached to chlorine atom gives glycidol. Glycidol is known
to be more reactive than ECH in these conditions [25] and
its presence can explain in part the high solubility of the
prepolymers in water. The reaction of the negative alkoxide
ion with the carbon attached to chlorine can also be
intermolecular or between different branches of a single
molecule. MEC5 is the product of the homopolymerization
of ECH with EG as initiator and also shows a low Cl
content. The loss of chlorine is thus attributed to a
combination of the described reactions.
3.4. Thermal analysis
A first approach to thermal analysis was made by visual
Table 6
Molar mass and M/ECH ratio of the prepolymers
MEC3
MEC4
MEC8
MEC12
M/ECH (reagents)
M/ECH (calc.)
M/ECH (corr.)
685
633
606
378
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:2
1:6.1
1:5.5
1:5.2
1:2.7
1:8.52
1:7.87
1:7.48
1:3.74
1:1.74
1:1.64
1:1.56
1:0.93
1774
4. Conclusions
Melamine/epichlorohydrin prepolymers were synthesized using NaOH and TEA as catalysts. Different
reaction conditions were tried and the products analysed.
ECH was shown to react with melamine amine groups
originating lateral chains. These have hydroxyl and epoxide
end groups, which can be used in cure reactions. The
structure and number of the lateral chains is similar in the
compounds synthesized with TEA or NaOH. The products
synthesized with a melamine/ECH ratio of 1:10 showed 4.8
4.9 lateral chains per molecule, with an average of 1.6
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
Fig. 6. DSC of MEC8.
[30]