For a printer friendly version of this

Brothelgate Blog click here:

##

For a printer friendly version of the

Brothelgate Information Sheet click here:
InformationSheet000-01

For a printer friendly version of the Brothelgate

Document Index click here:

THE PHONEY GENDER WAR AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, KILLER FAMILY COURTS

Australian Society is in the grips of a social cancer that attacks more than 450,000 Australians in
90,000 Australian families every year.

A Cancer on Society

Australia's unconstitutional, killer family courts are courts of evil, places of torture and injustice,
degradation and dehumanisation. Lawless places that produce unlawful outcomes at the
intersection of two battlegrounds. The first is a misplaced, phoney gender war. Like all phoney
wars, it is just a cover for a more sinister cold war raging beneath.

The real war beneath the phoney gender war is not a war between equal forces. It is not really a
war at all, given the inequality of arms. it is little more than a highly refined farming enterprise.
Australia is divided into a society of 22 million ordinary souls that are basically no more than
human cattle to be culled and reaped by Australia's 20,000 family lawyers. This is an annual
domestic trafficking in human lives that goes on with the full knowledge and blessing of Australia's
family law judges, bipartisan Australian Government policy and even supported by a AUD$Billion
of taxpayers money to lawyers statutory oligarchies to provide the necessary infrastructure and
seed capital for the process. The phoney gender war is a really serious big business for the
political and powerful elite.

Unconstitutional, Killer Family Laws and Courts

The unconstitutional, killer federal Australian family law courts are the principal abattoir for this
annual human trafficking.

Every year 450,000 Australians (90,000 ordinary families in distress comprised of 90,000 ordinary
dads, 90,000 ordinary mums and 270,000 ordinary children) are processed by Australian family
courts. 450,000 new souls processed every year in a country of barely 22 million people.

AUD$40 billion of wealth is stripped off these distressed families every year. As much as 80% of
this wealth is destroyed, totally wasted, in the process. But AUD$8 billion is transferred from
90,000 distressed families each year into the pockets of Australia's 20,000 family lawyers.

In the process of this redistribution of wealth from distressed ordinary families to privlieged lawyers
families, 33% of the dads, 30,000 fathers each year, are excommunicated from their children
(surely the ultimate torture for any parent) based on malicious false allegations of sexual predation,
incest and violence. Their fatherhood criminalised, their emotions, lives and futures shattered,
their identities and pasts falsified by their government, more than 1800 of these “beat dead” Aussie
dads commit suicide every year. This produces 5,500 more totally fatherless children each year.
The real figures are probably much higher. But no Government agency is going to seriously
investigate or record the true statistics. Statistics for delinquency, drugs, crime, depression and
suicide by children and teens of de-fathered children are more readily available. And they are very
disturbing.

Does anyone seriously believe that 33% of all Australian fathers are drunken, violent, drug-taking
incestuous paedophiles, kicked out of home in their teens for raping their unborn nieces, master
criminals who somehow were able to keep their crimes totally concealed from everyone close to
them for decades until they were exposed by a righteous and rightful family law process?
Frighteningly, there are domestic extremists, (female and male) pro-feminists writing propoganda
on almost a daily basis, “true believers” in the phoney gender war who seem to believe these
statistics are true and righteous.

Does anyone seriously suggest that unethical predatory and self-interested family lawyers,
lawless, juryless and unlawful courts, secretive and merciless places where all human rights, all
civil rights, all notions of truth and justice are left outside might be responsible for these statistically
fraud outcomes? Common sense and gender-neutral humanity and compassion say one thing.
Plenty of phoney propaganda promoting and funded from the profits of this phoney gender war
says something quite different.

Does anyone seriously believe that court processes that actively deny and exclude basic human
rights like equality under the law, right to a fair trial, innocence until proven guilty, she who
accuses is required to substantiate her accusations with evidence etc, laws punishing perjury
perversion of justice laws are the way to go to protect Australia's children from their dangerous
predatory fathers? Common sense and gender-neutral humanity and compassion say one thing.
Pro-feminist domestic extremists say something quite different.

An end to trafficking in distressed families

Does anyone seriously think that it should be a crime for any lawyer to come within 500 metres of
any family that is not his or her own family, and it should be a crime for any lawyer to come within
500 metres of any family court hearing? Does anyone think that removing the self-serving and
justice perverting family lawyers, removing the economics of human trafficking via the lawyers'
family law courts must happen first, before the phoney gender war can be exposed, the spread of
the underlying social cancer caan be contained and the healing process for 35 years of social and
family damage and misery can begin? This is a social cancer that over 35 years has touched the
lives of of 2 – 3 million Australians (including generations within the same family) – more than 10%
of all Australian's alive today. Does anybody wish to propose any other solutions for this national
social tragedy?

Family Law Fraud - BrothelGate

Welcome to the frightening true life world of BrothelGate.

InformationSheet000-01

All of the documents, evidence, reports, correspondences, transcripts and judgements are real and
authentic. The legal proceedings began in May 2007 and are unlikely to finish until 2016.

Brothelgate is a true story of a small country of 22 million souls in “a land where justice is just a
game.” as Bob Dylan sang in 1976 (The Ballad of Hurricane) and prominent human rights lawyer
Geoffrey Robertson QC (Author of 'The Justice Game';'Crimes Against Humanity'; 'The
Tyrannicide Brief' and “A Statute of Liberty: How Australian's can get their rights [sic] back') wrote
in 1998.
The BrothelGate trials show just how far Australia's lawyers law courts have divorced themselves
from reality, from basic stuff like fair hearings, independent evidence and application of laws in
family law cases. The Brothelgate trials show just how important this human trafficking in
distressed families is to the economies of Australia's ruling elite, the “second rate” Governmen and
Governwomen of Australia.

How else can you explain a situation where a prostitute succeeds in pulling off the ultimate family
law fraud, passing herself off as a 9 year de facto wife of a brothel client whom she dated for
barely a year, a decade ago?

How else can you explain a trial judge how deliberately (and unlawfully) shuts his eyes to the
evidence and to the law and even his own findings as to the perjury, deceitfulness of a self-
confessed, psychiatrically diagnosed compulsive liar – even if it means exposing the truth of
Australia's courts as places were laws, logic, morality and even sanity are suspended in order to
avoid having to hold incompetent and unethical lawyers accountable by avoiding finding “proven”
their serious, serial professional and criminal misconduct?

The victim at the heart of the BrothelGate fraud case, sees himself as a research scientist, trying to
find a solution for this social cancer, this corruption, this lack of standards and accountabilities
amongst the legal profession and the (other?) governing classes of Australian society. It is a
social cancer that has caused substantial harm to his children, his other loved ones and himself. It
is a social cancer that has caused substantial harm to 1 in 10 living Australians over 3 ½ decades.

This is a scam that came off only with a maximum of co-operation from incompetent, negligent,
fraudulent and corrupt Australian family lawyers and with the support and encouragement and
even hearty congratulations from supposedly independent judges who deliberately facilitated the
multiple miscarriages of justice necessary to pull it off.

The sting in the scam is that the woman never stood to gain anything from the fraud which would
destroy her AUD$1,000 per week golden meal ticket. Having racked up AUD$400,000 of legal
work for her on credit, “best case” will see the family lawyers taking $150,000 from the victim and
chasing their penniless, prostitute client for the remaining $250,000 (At $50 per trick per hour after
taxes and room rates, will take her up to a decade to pay off this debt.) Shockingly, more than half
of these 90,000 family law cases end this way every year, with mum's, dad's and children's
pockets and futures emptied and the family lawyers walking off with pockets only half or quarter
filled to do it all again to the next Australian family that stumbles into them. (The shrinkage doesn't
bother them as they have learned to factor this into their hourly rates - charging clients up to
AUD$190 per hour just for the receptionist who they pay AUD$20 per hour to answer their phone
so that the lawyer can avoid speaking to their 'clients' and leverage up their timesheets.)

BrothelGate is a unique story because it exposes most fully all of the evil of Australia's
unconstitutional, killer family courts – the same lack of legal ethics, standards and accountabilities,
the same unconstitutional court practices and violations of human rights that occur in 90,000 other
Australian cases every year. In a sense, where millions of Australian lives are being damaged
and destroyed every year none of these cases, not even BrothelGate is any worse than the others
– they are all as bad as each other.

The BrothelGate Documents

These BrothelGate materials comprise some 255 original documents and pieces of evidence (so
far). Here is a link to the full BrothelGate Document Index. The materials are organised as
follows:

1. The Human Story

 The Information Sheet contains the quickest introduction to the fact and the issues:

InformationSheet000-01

The story is also told, specifically in a Newspaper report of 18 October 2009 ('Court
Practices in the Dock'):

NewsStorySundayHeraldSun20081209High_Res_A4

Other Newspaper reports such as the Newspaper reports of 'Steve's case ('Banned Dad's
agonising loss') and the Freeman story ('Freeman very upset about custody ruling') ## paint
the bigger picture.
NewsStorySundayHeraldSun20091018High_Res_A4
News Story Age 20091009 High Res A4 (Freeman)

Other summaries of the BrothelGate story are contained in the Court Documents (including
the Section 35 Notice of Human Rights Violations, and the Court of Appeal Notice of
Appeal of 15 June 2009 and accompanying submissions.

FORM 1 Regulation 5 (Section 35 Notice of Human Rights Violations)

Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Fourth Restatement 2090615

Plain English Submissions for Court of Appeal Fourth Restatement 2090615

2. The Court Documents – Outlines of Claims and Appeal Documents

Four parts of the BrothelGate case are proceeding in the Victorian State Supreme Court.
Three of these are in the Court of Appeal (on appeal from the Trial Division). A fourth is in
the Trial Division (on appeal from the Masters Court to the Practice Court). These are not
four separate cases, they are but 4 splintered fragments of the one case. This fragmenting
is a key strategy to frustrate and deny the just hearing of all of the issues together according
to normal concepts of justice and due process.

Key Court Documents recording the claims and counterclaims, and the frightening multitude
of grounds of appeal are:

The Section 35 Notice of Human Rights Violations: FORM 1 Regulation 5

The Johnson Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal
Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Fourth Restatement 2090615

The Original Cressy Statement of Claim of November 2007:

BrothelGateTrialPleadingsCressyStatementOfClaim20071126

The infamous and illegal Amended Cressy Statement of Claim of 5 December 2008 ## (not
yet loaded) ##

The Original Draft Johnson Defence and Counterclaim of February 2008 and Supporting
Affidavit of February 2008

Brothel Gate Trial Pleadings Johnson First Defence and Counterclaim 20080218
Brothel Gate Trial Pleadings Affidavit Supporting Counterclaim 20080218

The Revised Draft Johnson Amended Defence and Counterclaim of November 2008
 Amended Defence and Counterclaim 20090323

The Johnson Court of Appeal Notice of Appeal (against all earlier Masters Court
judgements) [Not yeat loaded ##].

The Johnson Practice Court Notice of Appeal (listed for hearing on 9 February 2010) and
the Supporting Johnson Affidavit of 24 December 2009 and the Banned Johnson Affidavit
of 21 April 2009

BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Of2008NoNoticeReasonsOrders20091214

BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Of2008NoticeOfCourtHearing9February2010
BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Od2008JohnsonAffidavit24December2009
BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9283Of2008BannedJohnsonAffidavit21April2009 .

3. The Court Documents – Submissions and Evidence

The Submissions of Law and Fact and Evidence.

These include submissions of evidence presented at trial and ignored by the trial judge.
These also include evidence that was uncovered after the trial (including psychiatric
evidence unlawfully concealed by the lawyers) but produced to the Court of Appeal and the
Masters Court to further demonstrate the miscarriage of justice at the trial).

These include more than 20 written submissions (more than 200 pages) to which were
attached more than 1000 pages of evidence, transcript, extracts of High Court precedents,
legal text books (including writings by Geoffrey Robertson, Lewis Carroll and Bob Dylan)
none of which were acknowledged or addressed in the unprecedented 30 pages of
“reasons” handed down (lawlessly and unlawfully) by the Masters Court.

4. The Court Documents – The Transcripts

All of the the available transcripts from the Trial are available for review. The key days for
transcript would be Day 1 (“the illegal, snap insanity inquisition”), and the three Friday's of
the Trial being Day 4 (“opening of the defence case”), Day 9 (case closed pre-Xmas so as
not to interfere with the family lawyers holiday plans) and Day 15 (“defence closing
submissions”) as well as Day 18 (“Judgement Day”)

Brothel Gate Day 1 Full Day

Brothel Gate Day 4 Full Day
Brothel Gate Day 9 PM
Brothel Gate Day 15 AM
Brothel Gate Day 15 PM
Brothel Gate Day 18 Judgment Part Only

Parts of the Masters Court proceeding have been transcribed and may be added at a later
date.

The Court of Appeal proceedings were recorded but have not been transcribed. These
transcripts will be explosive, if funds become available to make them available at this site.

5. The Court Documents – The Judgements

6 Judgements are available here. 4 of these are judgements of the original trial judge,
 being the unpublished, unlawful insanity inquisition judgement (included in the transcript for
Day 1, Brothel Gate Day 1 Full Day

The next 3 are the 3 (shamefully out-of-sequence) published judgements sub-nom Cressy v
Johnson No.1, Cressy v Johnson No.2 and Cressy v Johnson No.3

Cressy v Johnson & Ors (No 3) [2009] VSC 52 (25 February 2009)
Cressy v Johnson & Ors (No 2) [2009] VSC 35 (11 February 2009)
Cressy v Johnson & Ors (No 1) [2009] VSC 35 (11 February 2009)

More than a dozen objectionable judgements by the original trial judge have never been
published (draw your own conclusions as to the reasons for all this secrecy).

The fifth judgement available here is the curious and unfortunate Court of Appeal
Judgement of 15 May 2009, inexplicably adding to the miscarriages by refusing to recognise
at this early stage the miscarriage of the original trial

JohnsonvCressy&Ors[2009]VSCA123(15May2009)

The sixth judgement available here is the “unpublished”, extraordinary, lawless, unlawful
and secretive, unprecedented 30 page Masters Court judgement. This frightening piece
of bad judicial taste and judgement was engineered to be delivered in the defendant's
absence in the circumstances described in the Johnson Supporting Affidavit of 24
December 2009.

BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Of2008NoNoticeReasonsOrders20091214

BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Of2008NoticeOfCourtHearing9February2010
BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9263Od2008JohnsonAffidavit24December2009
BrothelGateTrialSequelVSC9283Of2008BannedJohnsonAffidavit21April2009

All of these judgements are the subject of appeals on grounds that include gross errors of
process, gross errors of law and gross errors of fact. Readers are encouraged to compare
the statements of fact in the Johnson Affidavits, Court documents and submissions to the
body of evidence here displayed. Then compare the statements of fact in the judgements to
the body of evidence to see just how far divorced from the reality of the evidence are the
“official” judicial stories written up as judgements.

6. Relevant Case Decisions, News Reports and Media Reports

These provide social breadth and depth and allow you to confirm that allegations in the
Johnson Appeal Documents and submissions that the judgements fail to pay proper regard
to (and in many places radically and unlawfully depart) from the binding laws of this land as
spelled out in many prominent decisions of the High Court of Australia (including unanimous
decisions 70 or more years old).

7. Correspondences with Non-Judicial Arms of State and Federal Government

These correspondences illustrate the extent of deliberate Government failure to address

known abuses and injustices in the Australian family law courts.

These correspondences demonstrate the inequality of arms in this David and Goliath battle
between the defendant Johnson (his wealth stolen and not a penny of legal aid granted)
versus the 4 city solicitors firms and 4 city barristers, some AUD$2 million of Government
 funded unlimited lawyers legal aid, to seek to protect these 4 rogue family lawyers from
having their civil, professional and criminal misconduct exposed in a court of law.

These correspondences also demonstrate the wicked position adopted by the Law Institute
of Victoria, in violation of federal corporations laws and trade practices laws as well as
violation of contractual and other legal duties of care owed to the defendant Johnson. They
also included details of more criminally defamatory, Government funded insanity allegations
and investigations against the defendant Johnson (and his continuing clear demonstration o
of mental health and robustness).

The also demonstrate the wicked, tacit (or worse) collusion between Government funded
statutory oligarchies that use Government monies and policing powers not to police rogue
lawyers but to protect them – even to the point of actively and unlawfully persecuting those
who dare to complain about rogue lawyers or to complain about incompetence, misconduct
and corruption, including criminal violations of State whistleblowers legislation.

The correspondences also demonstrate the lip-service given to human rights legislation,
whistleblowers protection legislation and other governmental responsibilities by State and
Federal Attorney-Generals, Government and non-Governmental human rights
organisations and the apparent fearfulness of the Australian Prime Minister, Deputy Prime
Minister and Federal Attorney-General (refusing to give any acknowledgement of dozens of
written submissions from the Defendant Johnson).

A Way Forward – Culling the Secret War and Ending the Phoney War

What is clear is that Australia's families need Government protection from predatory farming by
Australia's 20,000 family lawyers. This AUD$40 billion annual destruction of families and lives and
AUD$8 Billion enrichment of Australia's 20,000 family lawyers needs to stop.

Australia's family law courts need to be restructured to comply with constitutional guarantees of
equality under the law, rights to a fair trial, proper rules of evidence and penalties and disincentives
for those who would make malicious false allegations or use children as pawns and even as
instruments of psychological terror, in property negotiations. Juries must be re-introduced, as is
every Australian's birthright, a birthright tracing back at least as far as September 11, 1215 when
King John signed sealed and delivered the Great Charters of English Liberties, including Magna
Charta. As Sir Edmund Coke, Lord Justice, commented some 400 years later, the primary
purpose of juries is to protect decent, honest, free men (and women) from tyranny and oppression.

Australia's family courts need to be lawyerless, family friendly places. 500 metre exclusion zones
are required to protect ordinary Australian children, male parents and female parents from
predation by Australia's 20,000 family lawyers.

Federal and State human rights laws need to be actioned, not merely lip-serviced. Legal aid
needs to be delivered not just pretended. Regulation of Australian lawyers needs to be actioned,
not merely lip-serviced or, what is worse our present situation where Australia's laws, courts and
regulators protect rogue lawyers and punish their victims for daring to complain. Whistleblowers
laws need to be actioned, not just lip-serviced or, what is worse, our present situation where the
Victorian Attorney-General refers to whistleblowers laws as a reason for refusing to investigate
whistles blown on corruption. Whistleblowers need to be protected, for real, not just for pretend
whilst they are in fact being persecuted. Ombudsmen, including the Victorian State Ombudsman
need to be given increased funding, staff and powers. Regulators need to regulate not protect
rogue lawyers.

Australia's elected representative, Australia's parliaments need to do what they were invented to
do namely to protect free, decent honest Australians from tyranny and oppression from lawless,
unlawful, out of control court proceedings which are run the best interests of lawyer's pockets with
the interests of the litigants treated as of lesser or even no importance.

The Sorry Country

In 1964 Australian author Donald Horne gave Australia the nickname of “The Lucky Country”, with
the social commentary that Australia was “a first rate country run by second rate people”.

In 2007 Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's inauguration included a 'sorry' speech for 50,000
half-caste children of indigenous descent “stolen” from their mothers during the 50s and 60s.
Successive apologies by Federal and State leaders since then include “sorry speeches” to British
orphans shipped to remote Australian towns after World War II. They also include “sorry
speeches” to children abused in State Government orphanages. These “sorry speeches”, words
that have not yet shown signs of translating into reparations and compensation, show that after 50
years of “second rate” Governmen and Governwomen running the country Australia is indeed a
“sorry country”.

A speech by then Deputy Speaker Rocher in the Australian Parliament on 16 June 1997, perhaps
the most powerful non-wartime speech ever made in an Australian parliament, shows that
Government apologies, and compensation are long overdue to the 2,000,000 plus ordinary
Australians who have been farmed by Australian family lawyers over the past 35 years. 90,000
Australian children a year removed by Government edict and Government policy from all
communication with their non-custodial parent (almost always their dad). This is a frightening
statistic. Just a single year of this trafficking dwarfs the numbers of indigenous “stolen generation”
children for the whole 25 years until that human trafficking was exposed and stopped.

RocherAPHHansard19970617High_Res_A4

Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Attorney-General
Robert McClelland are hiding in complete denial of BrothelGate and 90,000 other unconstitutional,
killer family law court proceedings every year. Is it because the numbers, the reality, including
potential compensation claims of AUD$500 billion plus predicted in Australian parliament over a
decade ago are all too frightening and all too real for them to comprehend?

Sorry Mr Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Co, but reality has its own way of intruding on even the
best kept, nurtured and Government-resourced delusions. All phoney wars and all class struggles
must eventully be culled or quelled. The Lord is subtle, but not malicious. Now its the Australian
Governmen's and Governwomen's turns to say sorry - Again.