Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1. Lactic acid bacteria
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are group of Gram-positive bacteria that are devoid of cytochromes
and preferring anaerobic conditions, fastidious, acid-tolerant and strictly fermentative. They are
usually non-motile and non-sporulating bacteria that produce lactic acid. This bacterial group
contains both rods (Lactobacilli and Carnobacteria) and cocci (Streptococci). Different species
of lactic acid bacteria (such as Streptococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Aerococcus,
Enterococcus, Vagococcus, Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium) have adapted to grow under widely
different environmental conditions. They are found in the gastrointestinal tract of various
animals, dairy products, seafood products, soil and on some plant surfaces (Ring & Gatesoupe,
1998). Although lactic acid bacteria are not dominant in the normal intestinal microbiota, several
trials have been undertaken to induce an artificial dominance of lactic acid bacteria (Verschuere
et al., 2000). Based on their carbohydrate metabolism LAB are divided into two distinct groups.
The homo-fermentative group utilizes the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (glycolytic) pathway to
transform a carbon source chiefly into lactic acid. Hetero-fermentative bacteria produce
equimolar amounts of lactate, CO2, ethanol or acetate from glucose exploiting phosphoketolase
pathway. Homo-fermentative group consist of Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus,
Streptococcus. Hetero-fermentative group include Leuconostoc, Weisella (Vasiljevik & Shah,
2008).
2.2. Probiotics
The word probiotics originates from the Greek word for life, and is currently used to name
bacteria associated with beneficial effects for humans and animals. According to WHO
5
guidelines probiotics defined as live organisms which when administered in adequate amounts
confer a health benefit on the host. Probiotics bacteria were first studied by Elie Metchnikoff, a
Noble laureate of 1908 in the field of medicine. He theorized that proteolytic microbes in the
colon produce toxic substances responsible for the aging process and proposed that consumption
of fermented milk would coat the colon with LABs, decreasing intestinal pH, suppressing
proteolytic bacteria and thus leading to slowing of the aging process (Gordon, 2008).
Metchnikoff and his followers ingested milk fermented with Bulgarian Bacillus and reported
health benefits (Vaughan, 1965). To qualify as a probiotic, certain criteria need to be met by a
bacterium: a bacterial strain must be identified completely, be harmless for ingestion, adhere to
mucosal membrane, able to colonize the gut epithelium, stable when stored, must survive the
acid and bile salt concentration persisting in upper GI tract (Verna & Lucak, 2010). Researchers
have studied and used probiotics in a variety of medical conditions. Bowe & Logan, (2011)
discussed the possibility of probiotics to cure acne vulgaris although there was no suitable trial
conducted up to now. Rerksuppaphol & Rerksuppaphol, (2010) tested Lactobacillus acidophilus
and Bifidobacterium bifidum against acute diarrhea in infants and children aged 2 months to 7
years. Probiotics shortened duration of diarrhea (34.1 and 34.8 h as against 58 h with placebo)
and also reduced the number of stools (7.3 and 8 vs 15.9 with placebo). Probiotics are also
helpful in preventing intestinal barrier dysfunction in acute pancreatitis (Lutgendorff et al.,
2009). Probiotic pre-treatment diminished acute pancreatitis induced increase in E. coli passage
(Probiotics 57.4 vs. placebo 223), Cr-EDTA flux (16.7 vs. 32.1 cm/s 10 -6), apoptosis, lipid
peroxidation (0.42 vs. 1.62 pmol MDA/mg protein). Ouwehand et al., (2009) reported efficacy
of their strain L. acidophilus NCFM in the alleviation of allergic rhinitis. Probiotic strain
Lactobacillus fermentum VR1-033PCC diminished atopic dermatitis in fifty-six children aged 6-
18 months and reduced the cases by 54% as compared to only 30% in placebo group. Probiotic
bacteria were also studied for their beneficial effect on autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (Lavasani
et al., 2010), childhood constipation (Bekkali et al., 2007), hypertension (Huey-Shilye et al.,
2009) and found them to be effective.
Class II LAB bacteriocins are small (30-60 amino acids), heat stable, non-lanthionine containing
peptides (Jung & Sahl, 1991). They have three subgroups a, b and c. Class IIa members share
conserved amino-terminal sequence (YGNGVXaac) and inhibitory activity towards food borne
pathogen Listeria. Example includes Pediocin ACH, Sakacin A, Leucocin A. Class IIb
bacteriocins inhibit target cells by forming pore in the membrane. Example include Lacticin F
and Lactococcin G. Class IIc bacteriocins are sec-dependent e.g. Acidocin B (Leer et al., 1995).
Class III consist of large, heat-labile bacteriocin such as Helveticins J and V (Joerger &
Klaenhammer, 1986; Vaughan et al., 1992). An additional class of bacteriocin is known recently
that require lipid or carbohydrate moiety for their activity e.g. Leuconocin S (Bruno &
Montiville, 1993) and Lactocin (Uprati & Hindsdill, 1975).
two peptide class II bacteriocin (mutacin IV). Nisin is most prominent lantibiotic bacteriocin that
was reported from Lactococcus lactis. Recently, nisin U produced by Streptococcus uberis
revealed 78% identity to Nisin A, subsequently considered to be a nisin variant (Wirawan et al.,
2006). Whitford et al., (2001) described a lantibiotic bovicin 255 produced by a Streptococcus
bovis isolated from cow rumen, whereas a class II non-lantibiotic, bovicin HJ50 was reported
from similar source by Xiao and co-workers (Xiao et al., 2004). In another study, two different
peptides bacteriocins named BHT-A and BHT-B were reported from Streptococcus rattus
(Hyink et al., 2005). During S. pyogenes screening 10% of the strains were found to produce
bacteriocins. Consequently, a lantibiotic Streptin was produced to homogeneity that showed a
molecular mass of 2.42 kDa (Wescombe & Tagg, 2003). Streptococcal bacteriocins were
reported from fermented foods. Macedocin is a lantibiotic from S. macedonicus, isolated from
artisan cheese (Georgalaki et al., 2002). Thermophilin 13, a two-peptide class IIb bacteriocin
produced by S. thermophilus, isolated from yoghurt (Marciset et al., 1997). An anti-listerial
bacteriocin phocaecin PI80 was produced by S. phocae PI80, isolated from the gut of Penaeus
indicus (Satish & Arul, 2009).
fermented sausages that produced enterocin A and B. They were active against a wide range of
Gram-positive bacteria, including Listeria and Staphylococci. N-terminal amino acid sequencing
revealed the similarity of enterocin A with pediocin family of bacteriocins whereas enterocin B
showed strong homology to carnobacteriocin A (Casaus et al., 1997). Enterocin P inhibited most
of food-borne Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria, such as L. monocytogenes, S. aureus,
Clostridium perfringens and C. botulinum. It withstood high temperature treatment (121C for
15 min) as well as wide exposure to pH (2.0 11.0), freeze thawing, lyophilization and longterm storage at 4 and 20C (Cintas et al., 1997). Enterocin L50, initially referred to as pediocin
L50 is a plasmid encoded broad-spectrum bacteriocin produced by E. faecium L50. It showed
similarity to small group of cytolytic peptides secreted by certain Staphylococci (Cintas et al.,
1998). Enterocin A, enterocin B and enterocin P like bacteriocins were reported from E. faecium
JCM 5804. They inhibited the growth of Clostridium spp., L. monocytogenes, and vancomycin
resistant Enterococcus (Park et al., 2003). Elotmani et al., (2002), Characterized anti-L.
monocytogenes bacteriocin from E. faecium isolated from Raib, a Morrocon tradition fermented
milk. In a similar manner, another research group reported anti-L. monocytogenes bacteriocinlike inhibitory substance from E. faecium UQ31 (Alvarado et al., 2005). Biochemical and
genetic characterization of enterocin A was performed by Aymerich et al., (1996) and reported
that enterocin A leader sequence contain 18 amino acid residues. This belongs to the doubleglycine leaders which are found among most other small non-lantibiotics bacteriocins, some
lantibiotics and colicin V. Similarly, genetic characterization of enterocin I from E. faecium 6T1a
was performed and it was reported that enterocin I does not belongs to the pediocin family of
bacteriocins (Floriano et al., 1998). E. faecium EK13 produces enterocin A and possess probiotic
properties and proved as a candidate for rabbit probiotics (Laukova et al., 2006).
10
11
12
cod fry. After 3 weeks of feeding the fry, they were exposed to a virulent strain of Vibrio
anguillarum. The number of death was recorded during a further 3 weeks of feeding with feed
supplemented with lactic acid bacteria. A certain improvement in disease resistance was
obtained, and at the end of the experiment lactic acid bacteria dominated the intestinal flora in
surviving fish given feed supplemented with lactic acid bacteria. Lara-Flores et al., (2003) used
two probiotic bacteria and the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae as growth promoters in Nile
tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry. The results of this study indicated that the fry subjected to
diets with a probiotic supplement exhibited greater growth than those fed with the control diet. In
addition, they suggested that the yeast is an appropriate growth-stimulating additive in tilapia
cultivation. Gopalakannan & Arul, (2011) isolated Enterococcus faecium MC13 from the gut of
grey mullet Mugil cephalus and studied their protective effect on Cyprinus carpio after
challenging with pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. In their study, fish group treated with
probiotic showed reduced mortality (22%) and also fish were healthy but untreated fish group
resulted in 100% mortality.
13
2009). Lactic acid bacteria perform an essential role in the preservation and production of
wholesome fermented foods. Homo-fermentative and the hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacteria
are generally fastidious on artificial media but they grow readily in most food substrates and
lower the pH rapidly to a point where other competing organisms are no longer able to grow.
Leuconostocs and lactic Streptococci generally lower the pH to 4.0-4.5 and some of the
Lactobacilli and Pediococci to about 3.5 (Steinkraus, 1983). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
comprise large part of probiotic microflora. There are many LAB strains that have obtained
generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status and used commonly in commercial food products for
human consumption. Probiotics are mono or mixed cultures of live microorganisms that might
beneficially affect the host by improving the characteristics of indigenous microflora (Holzapfel
et al., 1998). Lactic acid bacterial genera consist of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus,
Streptococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Wesiella etc.
India is traditionally rich in fermented foods. In the Indian subcontinent, making use of
fermented food using local food crops and other biological resources are very common. But the
nature of the products and base material vary from region to region (Sekar & Mariappan, 2007).
Fermented foods like idli and dahi were described as early as 700 BC. At present there are
hundreds of fermented foods with different base materials and preparation methodology. Each
fermented food is associated with unique group of microflora which increases the level of
proteins, vitamins, essential amino acids and fatty acids. However, fermented foods are still
produced traditionally by spontaneous fermentation and only limited knowledge has been
obtained regarding the microflora of these products (Jeyaram et al., 2009). Based upon the basic
ingredients used, fermented foods have been divided into 7 major types (Sekar & Mariappan,
2007): (i) cereal based (with/without pulses) fermented foods, (ii) cereal/pulse and butter milk
14
based fermented food, (iii) cereal based fermented sweets and snacks, (iv) milk based fermented
foods, (v) vegetable, bamboo shoot and unripe fruits based fermented foods, (vi) meat based
fermented foods, and (vii) pulse based fermented foods.
15
successfully
prevented
colonization
of
enterovirulent
bacterium
Vibrio
16
17
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, L. casei subsp. casei and L. bifermentans (Table 1). There
are reports that LAB isolated from dahi can be used to cure intestinal disease such as diarrhea
(Agarwal & Bhasin, 2002), intake of dahi has anti-cholesteremic (Sinha & Sinha, 2000), anticarcinogenic (Arvind et al., 2010), anti-diabetic (Yadav et al., 2007a), angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibition effect (Harun-ur-Rashid et al., 2007) and anti-atopic dermatitis effect
(Watanabe et al., 2009).
produced nisin like (Nisin Z) bacteriocin that inhibited important food pathogens Listeria
monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus.
2.5.5. Vegetable, bamboo shoot and unripe fruits based fermented foods
The lactic acid fermentation of vegetables, applied as a preservation method for the production
of finished and half-finished products, is considered as an important technology because of its
capability to improve the nutritive value, palatability, acceptability, microbial quality and shelf
life of the fermented product (Kingston et al., 2010). Moreover, this is a remarkable procedure to
store the perishable vegetable in absence of cold-storage or refrigeration, where majority of rural
people cannot afford canned or frozen foods. Certain fermented vegetable products (gundruk,
sinki, iniziangsang) are said to be good appetizers and the ethnic people use these foods for
remedies from indigestion (Tamang & Tamang, 2009). Fermented bamboo shoot (BSs) products
are consumed as a traditional food by ethnic people of North-Eastern states of India (Tamang et
al., 2009). In India, BSs are harvested annually in Sikkim (26.2 t), Meghalaya (435 t) and
Mizoram (426.8 t). Bamboo shoots are low in fat and cholesterol, but very high in potassium,
carbohydrates and dietary fibres. Many nutritious and active materials (vitamins and amino
acids) and antioxidants (flavones, phenols and steroids) can be extracted from bamboo shoots
18
(Choudhury et al., 2011). LABs are the dominant microorganisms in ethnic fermented vegetables
and bamboo shoot products (Tamang et al., 2009). Pediococcus pentasaceous, Lactobacillus
cellubiosus, L. plantarum, L. fermentum, L. brevis, L. mesenteroides, Lactococcus lactis,
Enterococcus faecium, and P. acidilactici are predominant LAB species found in fermented
vegetables (Table 1). Tamang et al., (2009) determined the functional properties of lactic acid
bacteria isolated from ethnic fermented vegetables (gundruk, sinki, khalpi and inziangsang) of
the Himalayas. LAB strains showed strong acidification and coagulation activities. They showed
antimicrobial activity, particularly a strain L. plantarum isolated from inziangsang, a fermented
leafy vegetable product, was inhibitory towards Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. LAB strains showed various enzymatic activities such as alkaline phosphatase,
esterase, lipase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cysteine-arylamidase, acid phosphatase,
napthol-AS-B1-phosphohydrolase,
-galactosidase,
-galactosidase,
-glucosidase,
19
20
Kallappam
Dhokla
South
India
North
India
South
India
Ambali
Pediococcus sp.,
Streptococcus sp.,
Leuconostoc sp.
L. fermentum, L. plantarum
L. fermentum, L.
mesenteroides, S. faecalis
L. fermentum, L.
mesenteroides, S. faecalis
Bhaturu or
Indigenous bread
L. plantarum, L. acidophilus,
L. mesenteroides,
Lactococcus lactis
Himachal
Pradesh
21
Reference
Satish et al.,
2010
Ramakrishnan,
1977; 1979
Mukherjee et al.,
1965, Steinkraus
et al., 1967
Labana, &
Kawatra, 1986,
Chavan, &
Kadam, 1989;
Steinkraus, 1996
Chavan, &
Kadam, 1989
Satish et al.,
2010
Ramakrishnan et
al., 1976;
Blandino et al.,
2003, Roy et al.,
2007
Ramakrishnan,
1977; 1979
Blandino et al.,
2003
Weissella paramesenteroides
Satish et al.,
2010
L. fermentum, S. lactis, L.
buchneri, S. faecalis
Ramakrishnan,
1977, Prakash et
al., 2004
Tamang, 1998,
Thakur et al.,
2004; Kanwar et
al., 2007
Milk based fermented foods
Curd (Dahi,
Milk
Thayir)
India
Chhurpi or Durkha
or churapi
Arunachal
Pradesh
Chhu
Sikkim
Philu or Philuk
Sikkim
Shyow
Cow/yak milk
Sikkim
Mohi
Cow milk
Sikkim
Somar
Cow milk
Sikkim
Khadi
Buttermilk/curd
Gujrat
S. cremoris, S. lactis,
S.thermophilus,
L. bulgaricus, L. acidophilus,
L. helveticus, L. cremoris,
Pediococcus pentosaceous, P.
acidilactici, W. cibara, W.
paramesenteroides, L.
fermentum, L. plantarum,
Lactobacillus delbrueckii
subsp. indicus
L. plantarum, L.curvatus, L.
fermentum, L. paracasei
subsp. pseudoplantarum, L.
alimentarius, L. kefir, L.
hilgardii, Enterococcus
faecium and Leuconostoc
mesenteroides, L. helveticus
L. farciminis, L. brevis, L.
alimentarius, Lactococcus
lactis subsp. cremoris
L. casei subsp. casei,
L.bifermentans
and Enterococcus faecium
L.bifermentans, L. paracasei
subsp. pseudoplantarum
L. alimentarius, Lactococcus
lactis subsp. lactis, L. lactis
subsp. cremoris
L. paracasei subsp.
pseudoplantarum
Pediococcus sp.
Radish root
Northeast
India
22
L. casei, L. brevis, L.
plantarum, Leuconostoc
fallax, L. fermentum
Srinivasan &
Banerjee, 1946;
Steinkraus, 1996;
Patil et al., 2010;
Davies, 1940;
Dellaglio et al.,
2005
Tamang &
Sarkar, 1988;
Tamang, 1998,
Tamang et al.,
2000; Singh et
al., 2007a;
Tiwari, &
Mahanta, 2007;
Prashant et al.,
2009
Dewan &
Tamang 2007b
Dewan &
Tamang 2007a
Dewan &
Tamang 2007a
Dewan &
Tamang 2007a
Dewan &
Tamang 2007a
Sukumar &
Ghosh 2010
Dahal et al.,
2005; Singh et
al., 2007b;
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009
Tamang &
Sarkar, 1993;
Singh et al.,
Sauerkraut or
Sauerkohi
Soibum or Soijim
Cabbage
India
Bamboo shoots
Manipur,
Nagaland
Soidon
Bamboo shoots
Manipur
Hiring
Bamboo shoots
Northeast
India
Ekung
Bamboo shoots
Manipur
Eup
Bamboo shoots
Mesu
Bamboo shoots
Arunachal
Pradesh
Darjeeling
hills and
Sikkim
Khalpi
Cucumber
Sikkim
Goyang
Darjeeling
hills and
Sikkim
North
India
L. plantarum, L. brevis,
Lactococcus lactis,
Enterococcus faecium,
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Lactobacillus plantarum, L.
brevis, Pediococcus
acidilactici
L. pentosus, L.
paraplantarum, L. plantarum
Manipur
Enterococcus faecium, L.
Inziangsang
Kanji
Nagaland,
Manipur
23
L. mesenteroides, L.
plantarum
Lactobacillus plantarum, L.
brevis, L. corniformis, L.
delbrueckii, Leuconostoc
fallax, L. lactis, L.
mesenteroides, Enterococcus
durans,
Streptococcus lactis, Bacillus
subtilis, B. licheniformis, B.
coagulans
Lactobacillus brevis,
Leuconostoc fallax, L. lactis,
L. plantarum, Carnobacterium
sp., E. faecium
L. plantarum, Lactococcus
lactis
Lactobacillus plantarum, L.
brevis, L.
casei, Tetragenococcus
halophilus
L. plantarum , L. fermentum
L. plantarum, L. brevis, L.
curvatus, Leuconostoc
citreum, Pediococcus
pentosaceus
L. brevis, L. plantarum
2007b
Steinkraus, 1996
Tamang &
Tamang,
2009; Jayaram et
al., 2009
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009;
Jeyaram et al.
2010
Singh et al.,
2007b; Tamang
& Tamang, 2009
Singh et al.,
2007b
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009
Tamang, 1998;
Tamang &
Tamang, 2010
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009
Tamang &
Tamang, 2009
Reddy et al.,
2007; Madhu et
al.,2010;
Kingston et al.
2010
Thapa et al.,
(Phoubu) Fish
and Assam
Hentak
Esomus danricus
(Fish), petioles of
Alocasia macrorhiza
Manipur
Tungtap
Meghalaya
Lang kargyong
Meat of cattle
Eastern
Himalayas
Yak kargyong
Meat of yak
Eastern
Himalayas
Faak kargyong
Meat of pig
Kheuri
Lang satchu
Yak/beef meat
Red meat of beef
Eastern
Himalayas
Sikkim
Sikkim
Yak satchu
Suka Ko Masu
Chilu
Chartayshya
Yak/beef/lamb meat
Red meat of cattle
Geema
Western
Himalayas
Arjia
Western
Himalayas
Tungrymbai
Soybeans
fructosus, L. amylophilus, L.
plantarum
Lactococcus lactis sub sp.
cremoris, L. plantarum,
Enterococcus faecium, L.
fructosus, L. amylophilus,
Lactococcus lactis sub sp.
cremoris, L. plantarum,
Enterococcus faecium, L.
fructosus, L. corneformis sub
sp. torquens,
Lactobacillus sake, L. curvatus,
L. divergens, L. carnis, L.
sanfrancisco, Leuconostoc
mesenteroides, E. faecium
L. plantarum, L. sake, L.casei,
L. curvatus, L. carnis, L.
divergens, L. sanfrancisco, Leu.
mesenteroides, E. faecium
L. brevis, L. plantarum, L.
carnis, L. mesenteroides
Not reported
L. casei, L. carnis, Pediococcus
pentosaceous
E. faecium, P. pentosaceous
L. plantarum, L. carnis, E.
faecium
2004; Jeyaram et
al., 2009
Thapa et al.,
2004; Jeyaram et
al., 2009
Not reported
Enterococcus hirae,
Pediococcus pentosaceous,
Weissella cibaria
Enterococcus durans, E. hirae,
Leuconostoc mesenteroides, L.
citreum, Pediococcus
pentosaceous
Enterococcus hirae, E. faecalis,
Pediococcus pentosaceous
Darjeeling
Sikkim
Enterococcus faecium
Meghalaya
Enterococcus faecium
Kiers et al.,
2000; Sarkar et
al., 2002,
Tamang, 2003;
Singh et al.,
2007b
Dike, & Odunfa,
2003, Murughar,
Sikkim
Darjeeling
hills and
Sikkim
Sikkim
Western
Himalayas
24
Thapa et al.,
2004, Murugkar
&
Subbulakshmi,
2006
Rai et al., 2010
Wadi
Punjab,
West
Bengal
L. mesenteroides, L.
fermentum
Wari
Uttar
Pradesh
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
Streptococcus thermophilus
Masyaura
Blackgram or
Darjeeling
greengram, Colocosia hills and
tuber, ashgourd or
Sikkim
radish
Pediococcus pentosaceous,
Pediococcus acidilactic, and
Lactobacillus sp.
& Subblakshmi,
2006; Tamang et
al.,
2009; Sohliya et
al., 2009
Batra & Millner,
1974; Sandhu et
al., 1986;
Sandhu & Soni
1989; Aidoo et
al., 2006
Tewary &
Muller, 1989,
Tewary &
Muller, 1992;
Kulkarni et al.,
1997
Dahal et al.,
2005; Dahal et
al., 2003.
2.6. Adherence of lactic acid bacteria to intestinal cell line and inhibition of pathogen
adherence
HT-29 and Caco-2 cells are human intestinal cell lines expressing morphologic and physiologic
characteristics of normal human enterocytes and these have been exploited to elucidate the
mechanisms mediating enteropathogen adhesion. More recently, these cell lines were used to
select and subsequently assess lactic acid bacteria on the basis of their adhesion properties
(Dunne et al., 2001). Nevertheless, they have also been used to study inhibition of pathogen
adhesion by lactic acid bacteria. Spurbeck & Arvidson, (2010) studied the inhibitory effect of
lactic acid bacteria strain Lactobacillus jensenii over pathogenic bacterium Neisseria gonorrhoea
during adherence to epithelial cells. Inhibitory protein produced by Lactobacillus jensenii blocks
gonococcal binding to extracellular matrix component. Similarly, probiotics attenuated
Campylobacter jejuni association with and internalization into E12 cells and translocation to the
basolateral medium of transwells (Alemka et al., 2010). Also, the probiotic agents L. plantarum
299v and L. rhamnosus GG quantitatively inhibited the adherence of an attaching and effacing
pathogenic E. coli to HT-29 cells (Mack et al., 1999). In another experiment, Lactobaillus
rhamnosus GG reduced morphological changes and diminished the number of A/E lesions
induced in response to EHEC 0157:H7 infection. With probiotic pre-treatment there was
corresponding attenuation of EHEC-induced drop in electrical resistance and the increase in
barrier permeability assays. In addition, L. rhamnosus GG protected epithelial monolayer against
EHEC-induced redistribution of the Claudin-I and Zo-I tight junction proteins (Johnson-Henry et
26
al., 2008). Coconnier et al., (1992) with the help of scanning electron microscope determined
that L. acidophilus BG2F04 interacted with the well-defined apical microvilli of Caco-2 cells
with cell damage and with mucus secreted by the sub-population of HT-29MTX-cells.
Adlerberth et al., (1996) defined a mannose specific adherence mechanism in L. plantarum
conferring binding to the human colonic cell line HT-29.
Bifidobacterium strains employed to treat colorectal cancer was undertaken. Challa et al., (1997)
conducted anticancer trial on male Fisher 344 rats using Bifidobacterium longum. Feeding of B.
longum reduced the number of aberrant crypt foci to 143 9 as against untreated carcinogen
control with 187 9 aberrant crypts. Other noteworthy work on anti-colorectal cancer property
of Bifidobacterium longum was performed by Singh et al., (1997) and Reddy & Revenson,
(1993). Randomized trial of dietary fiber and Lactobacillus casei administration for prevention
of colorectal cancer was performed by Ishikawa et al., (2005).They reported that the occurrence
rate of tumors with a grade of moderate atypia or higher was significantly lower in group
administered L. casei. But no significant difference in the development of new colorectal tumor
was observed with administration of L. casei. McIntosh et al., (1999) fed rats with Lactobacillus
acidophilus (Delvo Pro LA-1), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (GG), Bidobacterium animalis (CSCC
1941) and Streptococcus thermophilus (DD145) and strains were examined for their influence on
colon cancer. There was 25% reduced colon cancer in the L. acidophilus treated rats compared to
untreated DMH control.
28