Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
6 min
5392
6 min
4492
I. INTRODUCTION
Ma
y
Jun
e
f w (V )
k V
c c
k 1
V k
c
(1)
k: shape factor
c: scalar factor
V: wind speed
The probability for the speed V to be less than or equal to
V0 is called the cumulative distribution function. It has as
expression:
292
Fw (V V0 ) 1 e
V k
0
c
(2)
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 2, Issue 5, November 2012
For determining c and k, two approaches have been chosen
June (2008)
among the existing ones in the literature [1, 1012]:
y = 2,7316x - 4,3226
3
R2 = 0,9915
A. Approximated Method
The shape factor and the scale factor have as expression
[11]:
2
1
0
1.086
k
1 k 10
Vm
Vm
c
(1 1/ k )
-5
Fig. 1.B: Trend Line Algebraic Equation for the Month of June
(5)
B. Graphical Method
Eq. (2) can be rewritten as [12, 1,6]:
The wind data of the month of May and June (2008) have
been statistically analyzed. Table. II includes the wind data
processing results.
The average wind speed Vm, for each month, is
calculated by the equation:
Vm
(6)
The parameters k and c can be calculated through the least
square fitting of the data. In fact,
y b mx
(7)
x ln(V0 )
(8)
y ln ln(1 Fw (V V0 ))
(9)
Finally, the shape factor c and the scalar factor k will be
determined by:
k m
(10)
(11)
Fig. 1-a and Fig. 1-b show the trend line of each month
using equation (7).
May (2008)
3
y = 3,2283x - 5,8023
R2 = 0,995
0
0,5
1,5
2,5
data
trendline
1N
Vi
N i 1
(12)
N: number of records for each month.
The standard deviation, for each month, is given by:
data
trendline
2,5
-3
(4)
-1
-4
( x) t x 1et dt
1,5
-2
(3)
-1
: standard deviation,
Vm: average wind speed
: gamma function defined by the integral:
ce
0,5
1 N
(Vi Vm )2
N 1 i 1
(13)
Results show that the graphical method fits better the
WAsP results for May, with a relative error value of 1.10%
for c coefficient, and with a k coefficient equal to 3.08. In
June, it is the approximated method which fits the WAsP
results, with a relative error value of 1.10% for c coefficient,
and with a k coefficient equal to 2.21. This indicates that the
wind speed records are close to the average wind speed. Fig.
2-a, Fig. 2-b, Fig. 3-a and Fig. 3-b show the actual probability
density function (data), Weibull probability density function
using graphical method, approximated method and WAsP.
The actual probability density function is determined
through the relationship:
fi = ni/N
(14)
N: total number of wind data obtained in the month, ni: frequency of a particular wind speed value.
These functions can be used to predicate the average wind
speed and average wind power corresponding to each month.
-2
-3
VI. CONCLUSION
-4
-5
-6
-7
Fig. 1.A: Trend Line Algebraic Equation for the Month of May
293
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 2, Issue 5, November 2012
Driss Taoukil: Ph.D, Energetic Laboratory,
Physics Department,
disparity and the shape of the actual data distribution.
Faculty of Sciences of Tetuan, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetuan
However, this study should be completed by other studies 93000, Morocco.
witch will take into account bigger data sets of different
Abdelmajid El Bouardi: Professor, Energetic Laboratory, Physics
seasons and month of the year, to give a more accurate Department, Faculty of Sciences of Tetuan, Abdelmalek Essaadi University,
Tetuan 93000, Morocco.
comparison between the two methods.
REFERENCES
[1] F. A.L. Jowder, Wind power analysis and site matching of wind
turbine generators in Kingdom of Bahrain. Applied Energy
2009; 86; 538545.
294
ISSN: 2277-3754
ISO 9001:2008 Certified
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT)
Volume 2, Issue 5, November 2012
APPENDIX
Table. II: Comparison between Weibull Parameters Calculated By Graphical Method, Approximated Method and Wasp
Weibull
WAsP
Vm
(m/s)
(m/s)
May
5.45
June
4.12
Y0
k*
c*
k*
c*
1.53
-5.80
3.08
6.10
3.23
6.03
4.59%
1.10%
3.98
6.01
22.5%
1.42%
1.39
-4.32
2.21
4.50
2.73
4.87
19.0%
7.54%
3.26
4.59
32.2%
1.99%
*: relative error
Y0: trend line
100
100
Data
Graphic method
Approximated method
Data
75
75
Graphical method
Approximated method
f (%)
f (%)
50
50
25
25
0
0
10 11 12
10
11
12
U (m/s)
U (m/s)
Fig 2.A: Probability Density Function Of Wind Speeds (May).
295