Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Bandpass Filter
I. INTRODUCTION
IN
the new millennium, the explosions of infocommunication technologies have brought many new
broadband design challenges. To meet the challenge,
designers require fulfilling more functionality per unit
volume. For multi-channel/broadband operations more than
one octave bandwidth from active and passive devices are
demanded. Achieving such broad bandwidth from
conventional MMIC integrated circuits is not a trivial task.
Challenges also are to tackle the second and third order intermodulation products of active devices and higher order
harmonics in passive devices such as filters. Mitigating these
undesirable inherent characteristics of active and passive
devices is the big challenge for broadband designs. Other
challenges are the surface wave suppression in planar circuits
such as amplifiers, oscillators and microstrip patch antennas.
Surface waves propagating in high dielectric constant slabs
carry substantial energy in unwanted directions and create
unnecessary coupling between devices and reduce radiation
efficiency in antennas. Planar PBGSs can alleviate these
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
II. THEORY
The center frequency of the stopband of a PBGS that satisfies
Braggs condition is calculated approximately with the
following expression:
a =
...(1)
Where a is the period of the PBG pattern,
is the wave number in the dielectric slab.
is defined as
2f
= 0 e
c
(2)
. (3)
. (4)
. (5)
. (6)
. (7)
. (8)
Substrate
a
50-Ohm
T-line
a
a
. (9)
(10)
..................... (11)
...................... (12)
Fig. 2: Geometry of circular patterned 1-D uniform circular PBGSs under 50ohm transmission line.
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
Coupled
lines
D0
W50
Coupled
line
D0
Ground plane
Ground plane
Fig. 3: Geometry of a BPF having the perturbed ground plane with 2-D
uniform circular PBGSs.
D0
W50
Coupled
lines
Ground plane
D0
Fig. 6: Geometry of a BPF with uniform circular PBGSs under two extreme
50-ohm lines
W50
Ground plane
Fig. 4: Geometry of a BPF having the perturbed ground plane with 2-D dense
uniform circular PBGSs
Coupled
lines
PBGS with uniform
distribution
D0
W50
Ground plane
Fig. 7: Geometry of a BPF with uniform circular PBGSs under all coupled
lines including two extreme 50-ohm transmission lines.
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
IV. RESULTS
0
-10
-20
S-parameters (dB)
-20
-50
-60
-70
S21_3 row
-70
S11_1 row
-80
S21_ 1 row
4
6
8 10 12 14 16
Frequency (GHz)
Performances of BPF
10
15
20
Frequency (GHz)
25
-60
-40
S11_ 3 row
S21
-110
-10
-50
S11
-80
-30
-90
B.
-40
-100
S-parameters (dB)
S-parameters (dB)
-10
-30
-90
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
S11
-80
S21
-90
-100
0
10
15
20
Frequency (GHz)
25
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
-10
S-parameters (dB)
-20
-30
-50
-60
S11
-80
S21
-90
-100
0
0
10
15
20
-10
25
Frequency (GHz)
We simulated the BPF where the PBGSs are under two 50ohm line and the central coupled lines. The performance is
shown in Fig. 12.
-20
S-parameters (dB)
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
S11
-90
S21
-100
-110
0
10
15
20
Frequency (GHz)
25
-10
S-parameters (dB)
-40
-70
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
S11
-70
S21
-80
0
10
15
20
Frequency (GHz)
25
Finally we used PBG elements just under all the lines. With
this circumstance, the design provides S-parameters
performances as shown in Fig. 14. It can be seen that at 7.5
GHz the maximum RL is more than 30 dB. At 15 GHz the
maximum RL is zero dB and the transmission co-efficient is
about 30 dB. So in this case significant improvements in
fundamental and second harmonic frequencies are achieved.
Only small ripple in transmission band is noticed that can be
controlled with resizing the uniform circular PBGSs sizes.
-10
-10
-20
-20
S-parameters (dB)
S-parameters (dB)
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
-30
-40
-50
S11
-60
S21
-70
-30
-40
-50
-60
-80
5
10
15
20
Frequency (GHz)
IL at 2nd
harmonic
(dB)
-2.5
-9
IL
at
3rd
harmonic (dB)
0
0
- 40
-14
-2
-70
S11
-80
S21
-90
25
-100
0
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Frequency (GHz)
-10
-5
-30
-2
-15
-20
S-parameters (dB)
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
S21_Ref
-80
S21_UPBG
-90
-100
0
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Frequency (GHz)
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
The measured performances of an optimized reference BPF
and BPF over uniform circular PBGSs is shown in Table 2.
The performances are focused on IL bandwidth and the value
of second harmonic.
Table 2: MEASURED PERFORMANCE OF A REFERENCE BPF AND UPBGS
ASSISTED BPF
Types
Standard
BPF
BPF on
uniform
circular
PBGS
Average 3 dB
IL bandwidth
(%)
7.18
Average 2nd
harmonics
(dB)
6
16.02
26
V. CONCLUSION
We have investigated PBG assisted standard microstrip
transmission lines that are 2-D and 1-D in nature. The 2-D
PBGSs have three rows PBG elements. On the other hand 1-D
has one row of PBGSs. Both the designs provide good
stopband performances that have been used to suppress the
second harmonic of asymmetric coupled line BPF.
It can be seen that if 2-D uniform circular PBGSs are etched
in the ground plane in such a manner that the PBG elements
are not situated exactly under the lines of a BPF then the
second harmonic suppression is not significant at all. But if
the PBG elements are situated exactly under the line, they are
more impressive to suppress the harmonics and spurious
transmission. It can be seen that if the PBG distributions are
2-D in nature and PBG elements are located exactly under the
lines of BPFs and have rectangular lattice instead of square
lattice structures (dense PBGSs) are promising to suppress the
harmonics. PBG elements lying exactly under all the lines are
also sufficient to suppress the harmonics. This design is more
compact in all aspects. One important finding we have noted
down that the inclusion of uniform circular PBGSs in the
ground plane of a standard BPF are very useful to enhance the
IL bandwidth. They are much attractive as they suppress the
unwanted transmission as well as improve the bandwidth
REFERENCES
[1] D. Sievenpiper and E. Yablnovitch, Eliminating surface
currents with metallodielectric photonic crystals. IEEE Int.
Microwave Symp. Dig., Baltimore, MD June 7-12, 1998. pp.
663-666.
[2] R. Coccioli and T. Itoh Design of photonic band-gap
substrates for surface waves suppression, Microwave
symposium digest. IEEE MTT-S Int. Vol.3, pp.1259-1262
1998
Mollah, Karmakar and FU, Uniform Circular Photonic Bandgap Structures (PBGSs) for harmonic Suppression of a
Bandpass Filter
[17] M.N. Mollah and N.C. Karmakar, A compact photonic
bandgap assisted phased array antenna, APMC-2003, Seoul,
Korea, 4th-7th November-2003.
[18] V. Radisic et al. Novel architectures for high-efficiency
amplifiers for wireless applications, IEEE Trans .MTT. vol.
46, no.11, Nov. 1998 pp. 1901-1909.
[19] F-R Yang, K-P Ma, Y. Qian and T. Itoh A uniplanar
compact photonic-bandgap (UC-PBG) structure and its
applications for microwave circuits. IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory and Tech., vol47, no.8 pp.1509-1514,
Aug. 1999.
[20] R. E. Collin, Foundations for Microwave Engineering,
McGraw Hills, 2nd Edition, 1992.
[21] T. Itoh, Spectral domain immitance approach for
dispersion characteristics of generalized printed transmission
lines, IEEE Trans. MTT., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 733-736, July
1980.
[22] V. Radisic, Y. Qian, R. Coccioli, and T. Itoh, Novel 2-D
photonic bandgap structures for microstrip lines, IEEE
Microwave and guided wave lett., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69-71,
Feb. 1998.