Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
by Karlo Z. Valois
The protocols are aimed at distance from the mass, never subordinating the
superior to the inferior, dynamic control and awareness in all
circumstances.
Context
Perhaps the most recent texts outlining the kind of war protocol we are now
addressing is Budo Shoshinsu, a collection of the most authentic moral
teachings of the Japanese knights, written in the 16th Century for young
samurais to teach them the foundations of bushido, the spiritual path of the
warrior.
The teachings concern the appropriate perception of death (as an
opportunity for transcendence, which is apparent in everyday behavior,
heightened awareness and the importance of the moment), loyalty (towards
the superior and everything that is superior), high alert (always prepared to
face defining moments), martial arts (control over forces and actualizing
the principle of One, thus creating harmony between the inner world and
the environment), weaponry and behavior without excesses (excess is the
result of attachment: to wine, women, etc.attachment means being
dominated).
To live by the principles outlined in the teachings required to maintain
control over all areas of life (thoughts, emotions, actions on the physical
plane, higher states of consciousness). Control is analogous with
dominance over power(s), a fundamentally solar, male, royal principle.
In short the teachings were oriented towards maintaining the dominance of
the superior (pure, independent/detached, solar, royal, direct, masculine)
over the inferior (attached, dependent, lunar, reflective, dark, feminine).
The difference between Japan in the 1500s and the world at large today is
that Japan was a traditional society, quite isolated from its rapidly
1
goal. The mass has no other purpose, the force behind it is the absolute
anti-principle: it cant be reached, cant be realized, cant be actualized. It
doesnt even exist by itself: its existence depends on the principle of One it
is fighting against. This births senseless behavior, irrationalism, blind
mechanism, stupidity.
Orientation of the mass
Today we find the following elements that are typical of the mass:
Pleasure. It is fundamentally oriented towards the body, slightly oriented
towards the mind (not the intellect). The pursuit of pleasure is pervasive in
all areas of life. The illusion of the mass is that life is not worth living
without pleasure. They dont realize that the kind of pleasure they are
pursuing stems from the same roots as the pain and suffering they are
trying to avoid. The root is an unquenchable thirst for life (the cause of
their existence). Once pleasure is achieved, pain or suffering is
immanent. In the same token, once pain or suffering is experienced, the
pursuit of pleasure is intensified. The notion that peoples behavior is
driven by the avoidance of pain and the pursuit of pleasure was established
and this senseless behavior is truly valid for the masses today. Everything
people do to pursue pleasure is in the context of a material world view. All
their actions are the opposite of the actions of the superior. This difference
is perceivable by different style elements. Since pleasure is mostly material,
individuals in the mass are increasingly unable to differentiate between
types of pleasure. One aspect of materialism is exactly the lack of
differentiation. Emotional pain is cured by chocolate, alcohol, etc.
Examples outlined very briefly
Eating and drinking as perceived by the inferior
they eat and drink carbohydrates, glucose, lactose, calories, protein, fats,
alcohol, etc. focus is exclusively on the body. Also, eating and drinking
habits reflect emotional states and fluctuations. Eating and drinking may
become a compensation. Eating style is animalistic, greedy, voracious.
Prefer strong tastes for immediate benefits. The inferior consumes. Without
control. Blindly and in (mostly large) quantities.
Fun/entertainment inferior
Geared toward focusing the mind, to induce some level of negative
entropy; instead of the upward direction of the focus of the superior
however, the inferior focuses his attention downward.
3. Work and career
Artificial roles, where there is no room for the intellect (superiority); there
are rationalizations only, which are subordinated to inferior goals. People
are subordinated to functions and become mechanistic (robot like)
sometimes animalistic. The work environment was created specifically for
the masses and is mostly maintained by mass individuals. Just like
everywhere else, the pursuit of fun, pleasure, money and/or positions or
all of these is constant.
Work, fun and pleasure is mostly intertwined among the mass. The motto is
that if it feels good, it is good. Since the mass evaluates everything on a
physical level, they are ready to try anything under this motto, all the while,
due to their relative mindset, they are losing grasp on what feels good and
what doesnt: since they are on the lookout for new sources of pleasure,
they find less and less things that dont feel good.
Protocol in social situations:
First of all we must differentiate between the masses and people who dont
belong to the mass but are not (yet) superior either. These people are
potentially superior, but they are confused or not on a path to realization.
The presence of the superior means a force of integration for these people.
They start to realize latent potentials and perhaps organize around the
superior, gradually acquiring higher knowledge themselves and exhibiting
the superior style elements. When the caste system was alive, there were
three basic levels between the king and the slaves (warriors representing
controlled force, merchants, representing control over economics,
craftsmen, representing control over matterthe slaves were outside the
hierarchy, representing merely bodies who exercised no control by
themselves). In the time of Tradition superiority was reality and respect
from the less superior towards the more superior was authentic. Today
reality is defined by inferiority where respect has no foundations. Although
10
about the focus of the superior, see style elements of negative tendencies
11
Superior women know that everything they share with others, they take
away from their man, who they belong to completely: in this sense they are
worst than prostitutes, since prostitutes put on sale to the inferior which
already belongs to the inferior. A woman, intimately sharing information
with other men and even other women, puts on sale that, which belongs to
the superior. Naturally, even telling about this openly to the man after, is
not an excuse for the act already done.).
Even inferior men feel this truth and this is why they are only jealous of
other men, if they are unknown to them (at the womens work, from their
past, etc.). This truth doesnt know social ranks: blue color workers or
bankers feel the same burning jealousy. If the woman is flirting with their
own friends, even if it is in front of their own eyes, they are not jealous,
they dont even notice. Inferior women often cheat on their husbands with
family friends. Only the most primitive men dont care who their women
share information with. This is because their view is so materialistic, that
they themselves identify with their body only, thus thats all they want from
the woman, as well. Since the woman, through her sexuality closely
identifies with her body, the more primitive the man, the more feminine he
is.
Women typically break the protocol of not sharing precisely because they
have a man. They make small compromises to comply with social norms
and they think that situations are innocent or they confuse the notion of
being intimately nice with being nice with a distance. Both inferior
men and women take advantage of this confusion by being indiscreet. In
fact when a woman experiences indiscretion it maybe an indication that she
has not kept a distance. Indiscretion is sneaky. Always hidden, it looks
innocent, humorous or nice or has an its OK undertone (especially when
drinking is involved; in fact drinking with a man automatically
invites/encourages the inferior mans indiscretions), especially if it comes
from people who are considered to be acquaintances. Today people know a
lot of people but these are not relationships, they have no foundations;
they are superficious and meaningless. Needless to say that any kind of
indiscretion coming from strangers (however small, nice, funny, etc. they
maybe) are unacceptable . To use the samurai analogy, indiscretion is
analogous with somebody crazy trying to pick a fight. If it already
happened (couldnt have been avoided by distance), it must be dealt with
swiftly and and for good, to make sure it will never happen again: it is time
to use the sword.
The range of indiscretions is wide. It could be questions about private life,
13
16
women belong to him.3 They avoid situations that calls for subordination to
the inferior: women or inferior men. They are the symbol of One, royalty,
absolute man. Meditation and contemplation supreme is a daily practice.
Challenges are plentiful. Not making compromises is dangerous. Survival
is not possible without some adjustments. Situations may arise that their
presence activate latent potentials in men lower then them but who dont
belong to the mass. In such situations, even if the superior man is put in a
lower role in the artificial hierarchy, his dominance is still undeniable.
Today they must occupy positions of power even in this reverse hierarchy
so they can exert the kind of influence they must.
This is of course more than difficult but it maybe possible by staying both
inside and outside the system. Each man must have a plan to accomplish
this. They must avoid places of gross stupidity. Just being there is a
potential reason for corruption. They may experience direct attacks from
men putting them in situations, which are not natural (normally a superior
man should never meet a slave).
Source: http://www.cakravartin.com
3 the king is the active representation of One. This means that all men are his modalities and
through all men he actively possesses all women. He may claim any and all attached (in
actuality he never claims these) or unattached women. On a lower level (e.g. warrior) men
dont share women with other men. Since they are not controlled by sexuality, they can have
more women.
18