Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
All compression members are treated as pin-ended
regardless of actual end conditions but with an effective
length KL that may differ from the actual length.
The load capacity of a compression member is a function of
only the slenderness ratio and modulus of elasticity.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
Example 1
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Solution:
LRFD:
ASD:
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
For isolated columns that are not
part of the framing system, the
effective length factor given in
Table C-C2.2 will be adequate.
In case of a framed structure, the
columns are not independent
members but part of a continuous
structure.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
Except in the lower story, the columns are restrained at
both ends by their connection to beams and other
columns.
The frame is also unbraced, meaning that the horizontal
displacements of the frame are possible and all columns
are subjected to sidesway.
If Table C-C2.2 is used, the lower story columns are best
approximated by condition (f) and a value of K=2.0 may be
used.
For a columns such as AB, a value of K=1.2, corresponding
to condition (c), could be selected.
A more rational procedure, however, will account for the
degree of restraint provided by the connecting members.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
The rotational restraint provided by the beams, or girders,
at the end of a column is a function of rotational stiffnesses
of the members intersecting at the joint.
The rotational stiffness of a member is proportional to
EI/L, where I is moment of inertia of the cross-section
with respect to the axis of bending.
Gaylord et al. (1992) show that the effective length factor K
depends on the ratio of column stiffness to girder stiffness
at each end of the member.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Effective Length
If a very slender column is connected to girders having
large cross sections, the girders will effectively prevent
rotation of the column.
The ends of the column are approximately fixed, and K is
relatively small. This corresponds to small value of G.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Example 2
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Solution:
Solution:
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Braced frames
Unbraced frames resist lateral loads because
of their moment-resisting joints.
Often the frame is augmented by a bracing
system.
The additional resistance to lateral loads can
take the form of diagonal bracing or rigid
shear walls.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Braced frames
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Braced frames
In braced frames, the tendency for columns to sway is
blocked within a given panel, or bay for full height of the
frame.
A frame must resist not only the tendency to sway under
the action of lateral loads, but also the tendency to buckle
under the action of vertical loads.
Bracing to stabilize a structure against vertical loading is
called Stability bracing.
Appendix 6 of the AISC specification, Stability Bracing for
Columns and Beams, covers this type of bracing.
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Braced frames
Columns in braced frames are prevented from
sidesway and have some degree of rotational
restraint at their ends. Thus they are in a category
that lies somewhere between cases (a) and (d) in
Table C-C2.2 and K is between 0.5 and 1.0.
A value of 1.0 is always conservative for members of
braced frames.
10
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
11
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
12
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
13
Example 3
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Solution:
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
14
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
15
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Built-up Members
If the x-sectional properties of a built-up compression
member are known, its analysis is the same as for any other
compression member, provided the component parts of the
cross section are properly connected.
AISC E6 contains many details related to this connection with
separate requirements for members composed of two or
more rolled shapes and for members composed of plates or
combination of plates and shapes.
The design strength of a built-up compression member is a
function of the slenderness ratio. Hence the principal axes
and corresponding radii of gyration about these axes must be
determined.
Example 4
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
16
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Solution:
17
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
LRFD
Solution:
ASD
Solution:
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
18
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
19
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
Example 5
Solution:
20
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
21
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
2014
CE -515: Design of Steel Fall
Structures
LRFD
Solution:
ASD
Solution:
22