Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

DELIVERY OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, THE FINNISH MODEL

Jorma Rantanen, MD, PhD, Professor, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
Abstract
The history of Finnish occupational health services (OHS) traces back to early industrial revolution. The service system
has been developed according to the needs of the working life starting from occupational primary health care services
for workers and their families in the 19th century and continuing as a development of comprehensive, multidisciplinary
development-oriented service toward the third millennium.
At present the services cover virtually 100% of large and medium-sized companies while the micro enterprises and
self-employed are covered only for about 50%. The average coverage of the employees is some 90%. Development of
such high coverage has been supported by the following factors:

wide societal consensus on importance of OHS


stipulation of specific legislation on OHS
strong expert community for OHS
long-term research activity for the development of services
demonstration of economic efficiency of OHS.

The recent and future development of Finnish OHS include further expansion of coverage, strengthening of evidence
base for OHS, promotion of work ability of workers and development of workplace, work organization and enterprise
conducive to health. This calls for new strategies, new methods, and new competence of OHS.
DELIVERY OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, THE FINNISH MODEL
Jorma Rantanen, MD, PhD, Professor, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
Introduction
The social dimension has traditionally been an important aspect of Finnish work life from the early days of
industrialization, i.e. from the beginning of the 19th century, and long before, already in the ancient society. The first
legislation passed in the second half of the 19th century established the basic principles of the employer's liability for
occupational accidents, the regulation of unreasonable working hours, the work of women and of minors, the
establishment of labour inspection and control, and compulsory accident insurance. This first set of laws was renewed
40 and 50 years later in the 1920s and 1930s, when two new important aspects were added, workmens compensation
of occupational diseases, and a universal old age pension system (flat-rate pension system for all citizens).
The occupational health of early industries in the 19th century was mainly curative primary health care services.
Systematic prevention in occupational safety and health was started sporadically in some big industries already in the
1930s, but universally much later along with the third stage of legal reform in the 1950s. In the 1960s universal
sickness insurance for all citizens was established. As a part of that development the employers were allocated funds
from sickness insurance for curative health services at the workplace. The 1970s witnessed the reform of occupational
safety and health legislation and administration and labour inspection in connection with the "Nordic work environment
movement". New provisions for labour inspection were given and the legal status of occupational safety and health
committees at the company level as well as of safety representatives of employers were stipulated. Also the legislation
on universal primary health care providing primary health care services free of charge for all inhabitants was passed. A
special Act on Occupational Health Services was also produced providing preventive occupational health services for
all who take part in working life. The next major step was taken in the first half of the 1990s when the EU Directives
were transposed into the Finnish occupational safety and health legislation. Though the main content of transposition
was only formal, some important details, such as systematic risk assessment and the obligations for the employer to
prepare an occupational safety and health policy for the enterprise were seen as positive stimuli for Finnish
occupational safety and health. On the other hand, the Finnish occupational health service system clearly exceeded the
requirements of the Framework Directive 89/391 EC, which stipulate on preventive services and on health
examinations.
Early developments of occupational health and safety
Occupational health services were first developed for workers in industry, the defence forces, railways, and some other
trades from the times of the industrial revolution in the second half of the 19th century. The big manufacturing
industries, i.e. metallurgy, metal product industry, textile industry, pulp and paper production, etc. organized general08.12.2014
1
Birmingham.doc

practitioner-level (GP) health services for their workers and family members as soon as the factories were established.
Such services were in fact conventional primary health care services provided by employers for their employees and
their family members. On the other hand, the 1879 Ordinance on Trades obligated municipal councils to supervise both
the public health in the community and the conditions of health in industry. These were the early provisions for the
improvement of hygiene at work and for undertaking preventive actions. Although early provisions for compensation
of occupational accidents and diseases can be traced back to the first half of the 18th century, the first focused
provision on protection of workers' health at work was the Ordinance on Protection of Workers from the year 1889.
In the years after the World War II, the workforce was sparse and the work load of the nation was enormous due to the
pressures from reconstruction and payment of the war penalties. It was generally understood by the Government,
employers and trade unions that any loss of work capacity due to occupational accidents and diseases was to be
avoided, and this triggered actions for the further development of accident prevention and preventive occupational
health and safety. Systematic development of occupational health services to preventive direction was also started. The
consensus on importance and benefits for all partners from occupational health has prevailed since the 1940s and still
continuous in the 1990s.
In 1969 the rules of sickness insurance compensation for the costs of occupational health services were amended to
favour more preventive activities, and in 1971 the central organizations of employers and trade unions agreed upon the
organization of occupational health services for all employees. The coverage of services expanded steadily in well
organized industries and other big organizations, while the small enterprises, the self-employed, farmers and service
enterprises seemed not to be able to develop services for their workers. To improve the coverage further, to ensure the
preventive content, to equalize economic sustainability of OHS, and to provide well-trained expert personnel for OHS,
an Act on Occupational Health Services was passed in 1978. The main features of the OHS Act are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Main features of the Finnish Occupational Health Service Act of 1978
Obligations
Organizer: the employer
Financing: the employer/subsidized
Coverage: all employees
Use of competent health personnel
Voluntary for the self-employed
Contents
Essentially preventive
Curative services allowed
Risk-oriented
Only the core activities stipulated by law
Subsidies conditioned by content
Company-level action programme requested
Organization
Flexible, several alternatives for service provision
Full coverage (100%) as objective
Municipal health centres always responsible for service provision
Collaboration and participation
OH&S Committee evaluates the programme and report
Subsidies conditioned by the OH&S Committees statement
OHS personnel
Special training requested
Complementary training requested
Only health personnel stipulated law
Multidisciplinary team permitted but not requested
De facto need of multidisciplinary approach
The development since the enforcement of the Occupational Health Services Act has been highly positive as regards
the coverage of services (Figure 1) and the flow chart of services is presented in Figure 2. At present some 90% of
engaged employees are covered by services and more than 4,000 persons work in the Finnish OHS system, of whom
1,300 full- or part-time physicians and almost 2,000 nurses. The OHS system has survived surprisingly well the deep
economic recession and massive unemployment in the 1990s and, in fact, some new developments have taken place.
08.12.2014
2
Birmingham.doc

Figure 1. Employees covered by occupational health services (%)


Figure 2. Present flow-chart of OHS functions according to Good Occupational Health Practice
Some 10 years after the first enforcement of the OHS Act, new developments were again initiated by the Government.
The new trend was started by the commitment of the government and social partners to develop OHS according to the
lines of the ILO Convention No. 161 and Recommendation No. 171 on Occupational Health Services which Finland
ratified in 1986. A national programme for the development of OHS according to the lines of the ILO Convention was
presented in 1989 by the Government to the Parliament in the National Programme for the Development of Occupational Health Services. The Programme included 18 national development objectives for further strengthening of the
OHS system. The implementation of the Programme was evaluated in 1997, and most of the objectives plus a number
of new developments were achieved. The present objectives for the development of the content of Finnish OHS are
covering four main substantive approaches:
a)
Prevention of health and safety hazards by focusing on the hazards at work and work environment and also on
risk factors in the workers' working practices.
b)
Curative services to look at work-related and other morbidity, provide GP-level ambulatory health care, referral
to specialized health care and follow-up at work of workers with chronic diseases.
c)
Promotion of work ability of workers by utilizing the preventive and curative actions as described in a) and b)
plus by instituting actions towards workers' health, work environment and work organization for maintenance
and improvement of work ability and by improving health and professional capacities of the employers.
d)
Development of work organizations, management and other working cultures and collaboration and
participation so that motivation, job satisfaction, self-steering and productivity will be improved and
continuously developed.
The substantive content of Finnish OHS as stipulated by the OHS Act is presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Core activities stipulated by the Finnish OHS Act
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Surveillance of the work environment


Initiatives and advice on the control of hazards at work
Surveillance of the health of employees
Follow-up of the health of vulnerable groups
Adaptation of work and the work environment to the worker
Organization of first aid and emergency response
Promotion of health, work ability and health education
Collection of information on workers health
Provision of curative services for occupational diseases
Provision of general health care services

Some advanced big industries have made fascinating programmes for the development of comprehensive occupational
health services while, particularly the small-scale enterprises (SSEs) still struggle with the basic issues of safety and
health. It is also likely that the SSEs and self-employed never can meet the objectives of the Act without external
professional support. Since no market systems works in the field of SSEs and self-employed, the public sector
interventions and service provision are of crucial importance. Along with the implementation of the National
Programme, the Finnish OHS has moved to a new stage of evolution (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Evolution of Finnish occupational health services
Service provision options in Finnish OHS
The early development of service provision was dependent on the voluntary choice of big industries which usually led
to recruitment of occupational health physician and nurse to the company OHS units. The Act on Occupational Health
Services changed substantially the situation when all employers were obligated to organize services for their workers.
Small enterprises were not expected to organize their own OHS units and therefore more options for service provision
were needed. The OHS Act allows flexible choice of the service provision model, was it in-plant or service provided by
municipal health centre, external group services or private physicians' service. The two former options provide
occupational health services at present for about 70% of employees while the two latter services cover about one third
of work force (Figure 4). The services provided by municipal health centres which are publicly funded primary health
care units are of crucial importance since they are the only systems which can take responsibility on services for smallscale enterprises, farmers and self-employed in such a large country with remote sparsely populated areas as Finland.
08.12.2014
3
Birmingham.doc

Stipulating obligations for all employers to organize the services for all working people regardless of the size of
company, nature of employment, sector of economy or geographic location of the workplace together with options for
practical service provision has expanded the coverage of OHS to 90% of workers and about 95% of enterprises
(including the whole public sector, state and municipalities) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Organizational models for occupational health services in Finland in 1995
New strategies for the Finnish OHS in the 1990s
Surviving recession. When the economic recession and massive unemployment suddenly hit the country at the
beginning of the 1990s, the OHS system was already well stabilized, comprising both preventive and GP-level curative
services for more than 85% of the workforce, and including 50% of the self-employed. The Social Insurance Institution
reimbursed 50% of the costs of OHS to the employer, which constituted a substantial incentive for enterprises to
initiate and continue the provision of services. Contrary to the fears of many, this high level of organization and
reimbursement has survived the years of recession well. The reasons for such survival have been the wide and strong
consensus on the importance of OHS, demonstration of economic efficiency of OHS and need to take care of the work
ability of aging work force.
Promotion and maintenance of work ability. At the beginning of the 1990s some interesting new developments have
taken place. The Finnish workforce is aging rapidly, work ability problems are paramount, and high demands and
pressures for high productivity and quality are set by the modern competitive work life. Systematic research on aging
workers and work ability was started by the FIOH already at the beginning of the 1980s, and in 1990 the social partners
agreed, in connection with the collective agreement, on the development of measures for the maintenance of work
ability (MWA). In 1991 the government, through amendment of the Act on Occupational Health Services, included the
MWA activity as a legitimate element in occupational health services. Simultaneously, the Finnish Institute of
Occupational Health, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and other actors designed a MWA paradigm and
practices for MWA at the workplace. The core of the new paradigm is the so-called "triangle strategy" according to
which the health of the worker, the safety and general health of the work environment, and the work organizations are
developed simultaneously (Figure 5). At the moment dozens of MWA projects are going on. In 1997 over 75% of all
occupational health staff members were given training by FIOH in MWA principles and practices. The FIOH
established a MWA Centre in 1995 and research in the area was strengthened. A nation-wide Action Programme for
Aging Workers was launched by the government in June 1997 which will further strengthen the MWA movement. The
impact of such reform remains to be evaluated, but some of the evaluations of individual MWA projects show clearly
positive health and economic effects.
Figure 5. The new OHS paradigm
Quality management. The ISO quality standards are widely applied in the Finnish industries as elsewhere in Europe.
Also the health care sector has started to apply QM systems to ensure quality and improve the effectiveness of services.
It was found necessary to develop quality systems also for occupational health services. A joint proposition was made
by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and the FIOH to produce quality guidelines in collaboration with the OHS
practitioners. The guidebook, called "Good Occupational Health Practice", was completed in 1997. It has been
distributed to all over 1000 OHS units in the country, and is being boosted with an effective training programme by
FIOH. It is intended that each OHS staff member will be trained for GOPH within the next 12 years. The guideline is
supplemented with a high number (4050) of specific guides providing instructions for dealing with special issues and
problems at work, such as chemicals, heavy physical work, occupational stress, measurement of work ability,
biological factors, crisis management, workplace surveys, ergonomic planning, risk assessment, etc.
Small enterprises. Small enterprises have always been an underserved target group for OHS in all countries. Though
the Finnish OHS Act clearly stipulates that all employers, irrespective of company size, are obligated to organize OHS
for their employees, the practical implementation of such provision has been difficult, so that only about 50% of microenterprises of 110 workers, in particular, have been covered. To provide a response to the problems of SSEs the FIOH
launched in 1995 an Action Programme for Small Enterprises. The main objectives of the Programme were to survey
the OHS needs to expand the coverage of OHS, to improve the ability of OHS units to deal effectively with the
problems of occupational health and safety, to introduce methods for MWA, to provide tools for risk assessment, and to
improve the capacity to control the adverse environmental impact of the SSE on the neighbourhood of the company.
The programme has covered 319 SSEs, altogether 10,000 workers and 10 sectors of the economy. The number of
participating OHS units is 116. The programme and a number of other projects developing OHS for SSEs will provide
valuable new knowledge on OHS needs, methods for service provision and the impact of OHS on health, safety, work
ability and economy of SSEs.
08.12.2014
4
Birmingham.doc

Future challenges for OHS


The globalization of world economies, growing competition, aging of the workforce, rapid changes in the work life,
growing demands of work ability and competence, and the introduction of new technologies constitute a battery of
challenges which also OHS is expected to respond effectively. About 50% of the workforce of the 30 major Finnish
international companies work already outside Finland. More than 60% of the Finnish employees use communication
and information technologies at work. The proportion of aging workers is steadily increasing, while a relative shortage
of highly trained young workers is already visible. New substances, new technologies and new work organizations are
introduced, and new flexible work time schedules are implemented. Problems of light work ergonomics, psychological
stress and information work load burden a growing number of workers. New biological hazards and organic materials
are derived from growing mobility and from new biotechnology products. At the national level the enterprises are
fragmented, work contracts are shortened, and the continuity of care from the single workplace may disappear.
Surveillance of the work environment and workers' health, assessment of their exposures and risks become more
complicated and cumbersome. More and more people are self-employed and working at home. Such challenges differ
substantially from those of the traditional manufacturing industries for which OHS was originally designed. The
problems and challenges mentioned above call for further development of OHS their service provision and substantive
content. More comprehensive approach, more multidisciplinarity, more outcome-oriented direction, effectiveness and
impact-orientation instead of input and pro??cess-orientation is needed. As well the OHS cannot work in isolation, they
need to strengthen their collaboration with both the company core activities and the services and activities outside the
company.
Keeping abreast with the developments of new working life and providing competent and effective services in such
new situations will be a major challenge to OHS. Many of the solutions needed have not yet been generated.
The Finnish OHS model which is based on wide societal consensus, special legislation, a well-established service
infrastructure which to some extent is also a part of the municipal primary health care service infrastructure, has good
possibilities to adapt to the new conditions. Particularly, the optimal service provision models and primary
responsibility of municipal health centres to provide services always if the employer or self-employed needs them
provide realistic possibilities to cope with the new trends in the working life.
But much still remains to be done to meet both the traditional and new problems of OHS. The substantive content and
the methods as well as the competence of the OHS staff need to be continuously evaluated and renewed.
At the turn of the millennium we will be in the next step of evolution of OHS, which is characterized by the following
key elements:
comprehensive service covering physical, medical, psychological and social aspects of work

multidisciplinarity

prevention and promotion

quality-oriented and evidence-based

integrated with other activities of the company

collaborating with other services of the enterprise and those outside the company

based on the principle of participation of workers and employers

contributing positively to the work ability of the workers and to overall development of the enterprise.
References

FIOH. Hyv tyterveyshuoltokytnt. Opas toiminnan suunnitteluun ja seurantaan. (Good Occupational


Health Practice). Antti-Poika M, Taskinen H (toim.). Sosiaali- ja terveysministeri. Tyterveyslaitos,
Helsinki 1997.
ILO Convention No. 161 on Occupational Health Services. ILO, Geneva 1985.
ILO Recommendation No. 171 on Occupational Health Services. ILO, Geneva 1985.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. National Programme for Development of Occupational Health
Services, 1989.
Noro L. Tyterveyslaitos, tausta ja kehitys (Institute of Occupational Health, background and development),
Kerava, 1979.
08.12.2014

Birmingham.doc

Rantanen J. Occupational health in Finland 19451995; TTLFIOH50 years. In: From Research to
Prevention. Rantanen J, Lehtinen S, Hernberg S, et al. (eds.). Finnish Institute of Occupational Health,
Helsinki 1995:1731.
Rantanen J. Vision on the development of working life in the next decade. Government Report to the
Parliament, part II. Helsinki 1997:85132.
Rsnen K, Mkel P, Kankaanp E, Peurala M, Husman K. Tyterveyshuolto Suomessa vuonna 1995.
(Occupational health services in Finland in 1995). Tyterveyslaitos. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeri, Helsinki
1997. (in Finnish with English summary)

08.12.2014

Birmingham.doc