Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
RTU Institute of Industrial Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Riga, Latvia, Aleksandrs.Suzdalenko@rtu.lv
RTU Institute of Industrial Electronics and Electrical Engineering Riga, Latvia, gia@avene.eef.rtu.lv
I. INTRODUCTION
Generally the concept of Smart Grid means
enhancement of common electric grid with monitoring,
analysis, control and communication capabilities in order
to improve reliability, maximize throughput, increase
energy efficiency, provide consumer participation in the
energy distribution as well as allow diverse generation and
storage options[7].
The devices of Smart Grid tend to be efficient in energy
consumption field as well as smart enough to be able to
decide whether the device is working usefully or not. A
good example of where the Smart Grid concept should be
introduced is an indoor and outdoor lighting. The lighting
in municipal as well as in other buildings is often switched
on almost all day long in the corridors and staircase, in
spite of the need for illumination. The road lighting also is
switched on constantly during the night time without any
correction depending on traffic density and weather
conditions. If the mentioned parameters were monitored
and lighting levels were adjusted then the overall
consumption of the lighting system could be reduced.
The main goal of the given work is to identify the
approaches to the development the energy effective
automatically reconfigurable energy systems for the
effective control of lighting. This includes elaboration and
analysis of power converters for LED luminaries with
dimming possibility, analysis of the different LED
arrangement in the luminary to achieve uniform light
output.
II. LIGHTING IN MODERN SOCIETY
The world electricity consumption for lighting in 2005
of 3418 TWh represents 19% of the world's total
electricity consumption of 17982 TWh. Meaningful part
of consumed electrical energy is spent for street lighting
(for example, in Norway 3% of all electricity demand). At
the same time for an average commercial building the
lighting takes about 30-40% of its electricity bill [2][3]. It
is seen that the problem of energy efficiency in lighting is
important and topical.
TABLE I.
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT LIGHT SOURCES [1][5]
Lamp
technology
Incand.
Efficacy (*)
[lm/W]
10-17
Life time
[hours]
1k
100
Available Dimming
Level [%]
100
CRI
Halogen
12-20
2k
100
100
FL
20-60
10-20k
80
10
MV
25-40
14-20k
80
50
MH
35-50
10-15k
60-90
50
HPS
55-65
24-32k
40
80
LED
65-75
50-100k
70-90
100
Dimming Influence
Positive: lifetime extending
Negative: lifetime shorten halogen cycle doesn't work
Neutral
Negative: Lifetime shorten;
Color shifting
Negative: Lifetime shorten;
Color shifting
Positive: Lifetime extending
Positive: Efficacy risen,
Lifetime extending
Startup
time
Instantly
Instantly
1-5sek
5-7min
2-5min
5-10min
Instantly
* Typical expected performance in real-life applications. Based on mean lumens, and including ballast/driver, thermal
equilibrium and typical fixture Coefficient of Utilization losses.
220VAC
DC bus 40V
a) configuration
b) laboratory example
A. Regulation of current
The current stabilizer of the luminary includes a current
feedback with current sensor, error amplifier, PI or PID
regulator and power converter. However, it is difficult to
find an integrated current regulator while its discrete
implementation is bulky. That is why it has been decided
to adopt a voltage regulator to the given application.
Such voltage regulators are also designed as closed loop
systems, but they include a voltage feedback with voltage
divider as a sensor. In steady state mode the regulator
ensures 1.235V in its midpoint. The upper and lower parts
of such divider may be chosen arbitrary, but their ratio
defines the output voltage. If the voltage of the midpoint is
fixed the divider may be described as a branch with
constant current that is defined by 1.235V/RLOW (where
RLOW is the value of the lower resistor). Then, the upper
resistor may be even non-linear, for example, series of
LEDs its current will also be stabilized.
The proposed example is based on a classical buck
chopper (Fig. 1). Its preliminary simulation asks the
following choice of the applied elements: Lsw=220H,
Csw=1000F, VT1=IFRZ44N, VD1 SBL1060.
B. Pulse width modulation of current
This approach is based on the phenomenon of inertia of
the human eye. If a luminary is blinking fast enough then
such blinking is recognized as dimming. The depth of the
dimming depends on the duty cycle of the signal. There
are several possible realizations of this approach.
Direct PWM signal may be applied to the transistor
commutating DC voltage to the connected in series
LEDs and balancing resistor.
Inverted PWM signal may be applied to the transistor
short-circuiting the series connection of LEDs.
Direct PWM signal may be used as enable signal for the
current stabilizing IC [1].
For laboratory testing the first approach was used.
PWM signal was taken from a laboratory signal generator
and through a driver circuit applied to the transistor.
C. Commutation of groups
If the luminary contains few lighting devices they can
be controlled in groups thus providing several steps of
lighting. Utilization of the binary weighted groups gives
more levels of lighting with more constant step. Each
group of LEDs requires its own power supply that,
however, may be less complex (3 laboratory power
supplies were used in the experiments) [1].
In the given research 7 LEDs in three groups of 1, 2 and
4 diodes are used (Fig. 3-a and Fig. 3-b). Then there are 7
available levels of power and brightness (Fig. 3-c).
c) operation
Fig. 3. Grouping of lighting elements in the 70W 7 LED luminary.
1.5
0.5
0.5
-0.5
-1
-0.5
0.5
-0.5
-1
a) group switching
-0.5
1.5
80
60
0.5
40
20
-0.5
-1
-0.5
0.5
b) current PWM
0.5
c) current regulation
Fig. 4. Illuminance at 3/7 of control parameter
TABLE II.
AVERAGE BRIGHTNESS [LX] AT DIFFERENT VALUES OF CONTROL
PARAMETER AT DIFFERENT POWER SUPPLIES
Illumination
[Lx]
Type
202
403
610
768
958
1166
Grouping
(LED count / 7)
0,14
0,29
0,43
0,57
0,71
0,86
PWM
(Duty cycle %)
0,12
0,26
0,39
0,51
0,65
0,82
Current control
(I/Imax)
0,09
0,20
0,32
0,43
0,57
0,75
TABLE III.
LED WORKING TEMPERATURES [C] AT DIFFERENT POWER SUPPLIES
Illumination
[Lx]
Type
Grouping
PWM
Current control
TABLE IV.
202
610
958
96
36
42
96
51
63
103
79
79
[Lx]
Type
Grouping
202
403
610
768
958
1166
1362
10.0
19.2
28.6
37.5
46.3
56.0
65.0
PWM
14.1
22.9
29.9
35.9
44.4
53.4
62.6
Current
control
5.1
11.5
18.8
25.8
35.0
47.0
63.0
Energy Savings
(SON)
%
6
16
24
32
40
Energy Savings
(LED)
%
18
30
45
55
65
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
. . 500 .
.
, ,
, . : , 2008. 320.lpp.;
Lester R. Brown: Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization
New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009 - ISBN 978-0393-07103-0;
IEA (2006a) Lights Labors Lost. International Energy Agency,
OECD, Paris;
International Municipal Signal Association Adaptive
Roadway Lighting/ IMSA Journal 2006.g. 54. 58.lpp. http://www.imsasafety.org/journal/so06/18.pdf;
Dr. John W. Curran - 100000 hour lifetime and other LED
fairytales
/
LightFair
seminar
2008
http://www.ledtransformations.com/Lightfair_5-28-08.pdf;
Northern Ireland Assembly Energy Efficiency in Street
Lighting / Research paper 30/09 2009. 12 March;
National Institute of Standards and Technology SmartGrid site http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/.