Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fuel
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Escuela Superior de Ingenieros, University of Seville, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, E-41092 Seville, Spain
Cermica MALPESA, S.A. Ctra. N-IV Km. 303, 23710 Bailn, Jan, Spain
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 January 2010
Received in revised form 29 July 2010
Accepted 30 July 2010
Available online 13 August 2010
Keywords:
Bricks
Fly ash
Gasication
Biomass
Olive oil mill residues
a b s t r a c t
Biomass gasication technology offers an attractive way to use low-grade fuels in energy production with
high efciency and low environmental impact. However, an issue calling for further development is the
volume and quality of y ash, since biomass gasication y ash contains more un-reacted carbon compounds than y ash from direct combustion of similar fuels. This restricts direct gasication ash utilisation for many applications and makes some pre-treatment necessary, representing a signicant share of
the overall operating cost of gasication-based systems for energy production. Therefore, economical
methods for the management of this type of ash without any pre-treatment are attractive.
In this paper, we present an initial study on the manufacture of bricks made of gasication ash. Our
goal was to come up with a product which satises two basic requirements: (a) it has elevated percentages of y ash; and (b) it enables utilisation of ash without any pre-treatment. We have manufactured
bricks by means of conventional moulding and curing methods, using ash percentages of up to
20 wt.%. No special additives were added to provide the bricks with acceptable mechanical and/or insulating properties. The y ash used was generated in a uidised bed pilot plant for processing olive mill
cake, a by-product of the olive oil industry produced in large quantities in several EU countries.
Some mechanical and environmental properties of ash gasication bricks were studied and compared
with typical values for commercial bricks. The results lead us to conclude that the bricks could be used
commercially as low density clay masonry units with a good thermal insulating capacity and, therefore,
the potential for commercial development is promising. In addition, the environmental benet of waste
gasication added to the ash utilisation makes the overall process more attractive.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Atmospheric air gasication of biomass in a bubbling uidisedbed reactor is an attractive and simple process to convert a solid
material to a gaseous fuel [1]. This process leads to a fuel gas suitable for co-ring in existing boilers and, if a proper gas cleaning
section is installed, for feeding efcient gas engines and gas turbines for generating electricity. Apart from the energy value and
the quality of the produced gas, one of the key factors limiting gasication is related to y ash quality, especially the carbon content
of the ash.
In practice, the uses developed for combustion ashes cannot be
directly transferred to gasication ashes. For instance, the utilisation in the cement and concrete industry without pre-treatment
is not possible for most gasication ashes and the need for pretreatment has a direct impact on the nal cost of the overall process. Consequently, lessening the cost of the biomass and waste
gasication by developing sustainable and economical methods
for ash utilisation and management is an urgent need.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 954487271; fax: +34 9554461775.
E-mail address: pereira@esi.us.es (C. Fernndez-Pereira).
0016-2361/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.057
221
produced in the orujillo gasication is expected to behave like organic material in the sintering leaving small cavities in the brick
matrix. Also there are some advantages using y ash as raw material of bricks such as ring energy can be saved because of the
amounts of carbon contained in y ash [10].
This article aims to increase knowledge about the direct utilisation of y ash from biomass gasication in uidised beds. In particular, it deals with a preliminary study on the use of biomass ash as
a component of bricks with potential thermal and sound insulating
properties. The ashes were generated in a 150 kWth bubbling uidised bed pilot plant that processed orujillo [11]. Approximately
2 Mt/year of this agroindustrial waste is generated in Spain.
Though references can be found in the literature indicating that
coal gasication ashes may be used in the manufacture of bricks
[12,13], to the best of our knowledge this work describes in detail
the application of biomass gasication ash for brick manufacturing
for the rst time.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Pilot plant description
The biomass gasication ashes used for the present study were
generated at a pilot plant located at the Engineering School of the
University of Seville. Pilot plant gasication tests were carried out
at atmospheric pressure and temperatures of 700820 C in order
to assess the technical viability of gasifying orujillo. Experiments
were carried out in an experimental rig described in detail in a previously published article [12]. Therefore, only a brief description is
given here. Fig. 1 presents a schematic diagram of the pilot plant.
The gasication reactor is a bubbling uidised bed gasier designed to process up to 30 kg/h of solid biomass. It consists of a
4.2 m height refractory stainless steel reactor tted with a perfo-
rated distributor plate. The ash is purged from the bottom of the
gasier. Different air ow rates and air/biomass ratios were used
giving an equivalent ratio (ER) within the range of 0.170.31. A series of parameters, such as gasication efciency, thermal efciency, gas yield, overall carbon conversion, gas quality and
composition were measured vs. ER. General results and conclusions with regard to these technical parameters were fully discussed [13,14] and correlations between operating conditions
and ash quality are given in a previous work [15].
Apart from the hydrodynamic role of the bed material in uidised bed processes, there is also a major impact caused by the
physico-chemical bed material properties of the resulting y ash
[16]. The bed material used in the pilot plant tests was ote, a
subvolcanic rock with a mineralogical formula (CaMgFeTiAl)2
(SiAl)2O6. The ote used had an average particle size of 380 lm
and an apparent particle density of 2620 kg/m3. Approximately
12 kg of bed material was used during each test.
The gas leaving the freeboard section passes through two cyclones in series to collect entrained particles and, through a wet
scrubbing system, to remove the condensable tars. Solid material
is collected in bins placed under the cyclones.
2.2. Materials
The main characteristics of the solid materials used in the gasication tests are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In particular, Table 1
shows the main chemical characterization of the bed material ote
and ash whereas Table 2 reports the ash size-distribution. Potassium content of the ash is very high, and the high amount of unburned matter content is also noteworthy (Table 1). The HHV of
the gasication y ash can be used to determine whether or not
the y ash ring can contribute to the heat requirements during
the fabrication process [18].
Outlet
gas
Gasifier
Chimeney
Filters
Cyclones
Isolation Blanket
Water
Scrubber
Hoppers
Overflow
To Water
Tratement
Flexible
After Burner
Screw feeder
High-speed screw
Preheater
Propane
Ashtray
Fig. 1. Bubbling uidised bed 150 kWth pilot plant facility.
222
Table 1
Chemical compositions of fuel, bed material and ash.
Parameter
Parameter
Ote (wt.%)
LHV (MJ/kg)
HHV (MJ/kg)
C
H
N
O
Moisture
Ash
Volatile matter
Fixed carbon
14.09
15.02
36.57
3.71
1.00
27.32
10.82
20.41
53.34
15.44
Moisture (105 C)
LOI (750 C)
CaOa
MgOa
Fe2O3a
Al2O3a
SiO2a
K2Oa
Na2Oa
HHV (MJ/kg)
0.47
0.64
11.15
7.90
9.15
13.61
53.93
0.48
3.49
1.31
18.24
23.23
8.10
5.53
8.53
43.48
6.83
1.51
5.08
2.96
3.97
23.91
1.95
4.06
15.93
50.34
2.80
0.43
3.53
3.37
1.47
1.18
3.26
11.25
77.56
3.55
0.19
2.21
4.68
3.02
2.37
7.91
18.48
60.35
4.60
0.35
Table 2
Ash size-distribution.
Particle size-distribution
(lm)
Ash
(wt.%)
>300
300150
15090
9075
7545
<45
0.6
6.8
9.0
9.3
16.2
58.2
600
500
Counts
400
300
200
100
0
4
10
20
30
40
2 Theta
Ref. Ceniza - File: IDAEA15-0241.RAW - Type: 2Th/Th locked - Start: 4.066 - End: 60.0
00-046-1045 (*) - Quartz, syn - SiO2
00-041-1476 (*) - Sylvite, syn - KCl
00-023-0495 (N) - Magnesioarfvedsonite - (Na,K)3(Fe,Mg,Al)5Si8O22(F,OH)2
00-041-1487 (I) - Graphite-2H - C
00-019-0770 (I) - Talc-2M - Mg3Si4O10(OH)2
50
60
223
used for ceramic products [17] reveals that these materials contains the appropriate species to be considered as potentially suit-
224
225
ite and pyrophyllite of the clays (Figs. 46). CaO and Fe2O3 are
mainly due to the presence of calcite and hematite in the mixtures.
A thermo-gravimetric study (TG-SDTA Mettler Toledo 851) of
y ash, clays and unred (green) bricks was also carried out (Figs.
100
0,00020
95
90
0,00010
-0,00010
75
-0,00020
70
65
-0,00030
60
-0,00040
55
50
200
400
600
800
1000
-0,00050
1200
Temperature (C)
Fig. 7. Mass loss and rst derivative in thermal analyses of ote, gasication y ash (GFA), unred brick and clay.
100
15
90
10
Mass loss FA
Mass loss unfired brick
Mass loss clay
80
70
60
0
50
SDTA FA
SDTA unfired brick
SDTA clay
40
30
-5
-10
20
-15
10
200
400
600
800
Temperature (C)
Fig. 8. SDTA and mass loss of GFA, unred brick and clay.
1000
-20
1200
SDTA (C)
80
0,00000
85
226
Table 3
Ceramic characterization tests.
Ceramic test
Nomenclature
Typical values
for facing bricks
Units
MW
H
DLS
FLS
DBS
FBS
WA
D
2022
04
05
58
2040
324
16502350
%
%
%
%
N/mm2
N/mm2
%
kg/m3
1100
Temperature (C)
1000
900
N-1075
800
S-1075
N-1025
700
S-1025
600
N-1050
500
S-1050
400
N-1000
S-1000
300
200
100
0
120
240
360
480
600
720
840
960
Time (min)
Fig. 9. Normal (N) and slow (S) ring cycles.
1080
1200
227
the machine instructions, water absorption was calculated according to UNE 67027-1987 standard [20] and red bulk density was
determined following UNE-EN 772-13:2001 standard [21]. The
amorphous and crystalline phases were determined by XRD for
the sintered products after being crushed.
228
229
Table 4
Extrusion, drying and ring results.
Ceramic composition
F_A85CG15
F_A85CG15
F_B80CG20
F_B80CG20
F_C85CG15
F_C85CG15
1050
1075
1050
1075
1000
1025
Ceramic test
WM (%)
H (%)
DLSH?0 (%)
FLS (%)
DBS (N/mm2)
FBS (N/mm2)
WA (%)
D (kg/m3)
35.7
35.7
36.4
36.4
27.3
27.3
21.7
n.d.
31.2
32.1
18.9
19.2
0.2
0.3
1.3
1.7
0.4
0.3
2.0
2.6
1.2
1.9
2.3
2.5
4.4
4.4
2.9
2.9
2.6
2.6
11.5
11.4
4.6
4.3
10.5
10.3
32.1
29.8
37.1
35.6
13.4
12.6
1340
1370
1280
1290
1680
1710
230
the lower the thermal conductivity will be, which is why in principle, a light material offers better insulation properties in
construction.
Other effects of the ash addition are the increase in mixing
water for extrusion and the probable high suction derived from
the elevated porosity of the red probes, although this was not
measured. The mixing water requires high water consumption in
the moulding stage and heat during the drying process. The high
suction can create problems in the positioning of the unit being
used if a suitable mortar is not used.
The colour of the red probes, yellowish in F_A and F_B formulas and reddish in the F_C formula, is similar to that visible in formulas without ashes, although somewhat clearer. The ashes
calcined at 1000 C exhibit a light yellow colour. The appearance
of whitish yellow drier scum in composition F_C85CG15
(Fig. 10) is noteworthy. This scum can be seen clearly against the
red colour of the probes. The other two compositions (the yellow
ones) do not reveal the scum or it is not visible to the naked eye.
The composition which presents the best technical characteristics is F_A85CG15 (F_A is the most calcareous clay composition of
the three compositions tested). According to these characteristics,
the type of product that can be produced is a red clay unit L
(low density) UNE-EN 771-1 [18], as long as it improves the
mechanical resistance in green, dried and red units. For other
Table 5
Concentrations of metals in the ash column test leachates (CEN/TS 14405 test), with
and without insulation categories limit values for column test leachate concentrations according to the DSQ, and concentration limit of metals in EULFD for NHW and
IW (all measurements are expressed in mg/kg).
Element
As
Ba
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
V
Zn
CEN/TS 14405
test
Orujillo
gasication ash
DSQ
EULFD
Without
insulation
With
insulation
NHW
limits
IW
limits
0.49
6.05
<0.05
0.28
<0.05
1.61
<0.01
0.81
1.34
<0.49
<0.10
<0.49
<0.49
0.10
3.52
0.90
22.0
0.04
0.54
0.63
0.90
0.02
1.00
0.44
2.30
0.16
0.15
0.40
1.80
4.50
2.00
100
0.06
2.40
7.00
10.0
0.08
15.0
2.10
8.30
0.70
3.00
2.30
20.0
14.0
2.00
100
1.00
0.50
20.0
0.04
10.0
50.0
0.20
10.0
10.0
10.0
0.70
0.50
0.50
2.00
0.01
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.06
0.10
50.0
4.00
231
As
Ba
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Hg
Mo
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
Sn
V
Zn
F_B80CG20
DSQ limits
HW UK limits
260
1500
3.80
60
120
98
1.40
144
81
400
8.70
4.80
50
320
800
20
150
1
F_C85CG15
1050
1075
1050
1075
1000
1025
<11.7
5.78
<0.25
<1.17
<1.17
<7.04
<0.03
14.61
<2.35
<11.7
<2.35
<0.47
<11.7
30.3
<4.64
<11.7
6.40
<0.23
<1.17
<1.17
<7.04
<0.03
33.4
<2.35
<11.7
<2.35
<0.47
<11.7
<36.6
<3.70
<11.8
6.06
<0.24
<1.18
<3.41
<7.06
<0.01
<10.6
<2.35
<11.8
<2.35
<0.47
<11.8
102
<11.8
<11.8
7.56
<0.24
<1.18
<8.06
<7.06
<0.01
14.4
<2.35
<11.8
<2.35
<0.47
<11.8
127
<0.68
<11.0
3.48
<0.22
<1.10
<2.93
<6.58
<0.01
23.8
<2.19
<10.3
<2.19
<0.44
<11.0
239.1
<0.58
<11.0
2.14
<0.22
<1.10
<1.10
<6.58
<0.01
<21.6
<2.19
<10.3
<2.19
<0.44
<11.0
203
<0.85
25
60
0.40
20
15
20
2.50
5
100
Table 7
EN12457-4 leaching test results (mg/kg). Limit values for the leachate concentrations apply for granular waste acceptable at landlls for inert and non-hazardous waste according
to the EU waste landll directive.
Sample
As
Sb
Ni
Zn
Hg
Mo
Se
Cu
Co
Sn
Ba
Cd
Cr
Pb
F_C85CG15-1025
F_C85CG15-1000
F_B80CG20-1075
IW limits
NHW limits
0.31
<0.05
<0.05
0.5
2.0
<0.015
<0.015
<0.015
0.06
0.7
<0.05
0.37
0.14
0.4
10
0.33
5.23
0.84
4.0
50
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.01
0.2
6.58
10.74
4.9
2.06
1.43
0.25
0.5
10
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
0.1
0.5
<0.015
0.83
0.42
2
50
0.07
0.22
0.11
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.59
12.38
5.74
20
100
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.04
1
0.52
0.38
0.2
0.5
10
<0.015
<0.015
<0.015
0.5
10
Table 8
USEPA TCLP leaching test results (mg/L) and the maximum concentration of contaminants for toxicity characteristic.
Sample
As
Zn
Hg
Se
Cu
Ba
Cd
Cr
Pb
F_C85CG15-1025
F_C85CG15-1000
F_B80CG20-1075
USEPA
0.1
0.036
0.77
5
0.053
0.016
0.011
300
60.0001
60.0001
60.0001
0.2
60.0025
60.0025
60.0025
1
60.0015
60.0015
60.0015
5
0.283
0.051
0.077
100
60.001
60.001
60.001
0.5
0.017
0.023
0.016
5
60.0015
60.0015
60.0015
5
232
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the nancial support for this research
by the European Commission under the EU 5th framework programme, project number NNE5-2001-00598. The cooperation of
Cermica Malpesa (Bailn, Spain) in the characterization work with
bricks is greatly appreciated.
References
[1] Bridgwater AV. The technical and economic-feasibility of biomass gasication
for power-generation. Fuel 1995;74:63153.
[2] Vilches LF, Leiva C, Vale J, Fernndez-Pereira C. Insulating capacity of y ash
pastes used for passive protection against re. Cem Concr Compos
2005;27:77681.
[3] Vilches LF, Fernndez-Pereira C, Olivares del Valle J, Rodriguez Piero MA, Vale
J. Development of new re-proof products made from coal y ash: the CEFYR
project. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2002;77:3616.
[4] Vilches LF, Fernndez-Pereira C, Olivares del Valle J, Vale J. Recycling potential
of coal y ash and titanium waste as new re-proof products. Chem Eng J
2003;95:15561.
[5] Leiva C, Vilches LF, Fernndez-Pereira C, Vale J. Inuence of the type of ash on
the re resistance characteristics of ash-enriched mortars. Fuel
2005;84:14339.
[6] Anderson M. The use of PFA in ceramic products in combustion residues
current. In: Novel and renewable applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons;
1979. p. 12135.
[7] Holt E, Raivio P. Use of gasication residues in aerated autoclaved concrete.
Cem Concr Res 2005;35:796802.
[8] Holt E, Raivio P. Use of gasication residues in aerated autoclaved concrete
paving blocks. Cem Concr Res 2006;36:4418.
[9] Cultrone G, Sebastin E. Fly ash addition in clayey materials to improve the
quality of solid bricks. Construct Build Mater 2009;23:117884.
[10] Lingling X, Wei G, Tao W, Nanru Y. Study on red bricks with replacing clay by
y ash in high volume ratio. Construct Build Mater 2005;19:2437.
[11] Gmez-Barea A, Vilches LF, Leiva C, Campoy M, Fernndez-Pereira C. Plant
optimisation and ash recycling in uidised bed waste gasication. J Chem Eng
2009;146:22736.
[12] Gmez-Barea A, Arjona R, Ollero P. Pilot plant gasication of olive stone: a
technical assessment. Energy Fuels 2005;19:598605.
[13] Matjie RH, Van Alphen C. Mineralogical features of size and density fractions in
Sasol coal gasication ash, South Africa and potential by-products. Fuel
2008;87(89):143945.
[14] Matjie RH, Li Z, Ward CR, French D. Chemical composition of glass and
crystalline phases in coarse coal gasication ash. Fuel 2008;87(6):85769.
[15] Gmez-Barea A, Campoy M, Ollero P, Fernndez-Pereira C Pilot plant
experiences with uidised bed gasication of orujillo and MBM. In:
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on uidised bed
combustion, May 2024, Vienna, Austria; 2006. paper 66
[16] Ollero P., Gmez-Barea A. Improvement of the economics of biomass/waste
gasication by higher carbon conversion and advanced ash management.
Gasash Project, Final report; 2005 Dec. NNE5-2001-00598
[17] Strazzera B, Dondi M, Marsigli M. Composition and ceramic properties of
tertiary clays from Southern Sardinia (Italy). Appl Clay Sci 1997;12:24766.
[18] de la Casa JA, Lorite M, Jimnez J, Castro E. Valorisation of wastewater from
two-phase olive oil extraction in red clay brick production. J Hazard Mater
2009;169:2718.
[19] UNE-EN 771-1. Specication for masonry units. Part 1: Clay masonry units;
2003 Nov. See also: EN 771-1: 2003/A1. 2005 Feb.
[20] UNE 67027: 1984. Burned clay bricks. Determination of the water absorption.
[21] Spanish Standard EN 772. Methods of test for masonry unit. Part 13:
Determination of net and gross dry density of masonry units; 2001
[22] Spanish Standard EN 12457-4, Characterisation of waste. Leaching.
Compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges; 2003
Oct.
[23] US Environmental Protection Agency, Method 1311 toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure (TCLP); 1992 Jul.
[24] European Committee for Standardization. Characterization of waste-leaching
behaviour tests-up-ow percolation test (under specied conditions), CEN/TS
14405; 2004.
[25] Netherlands Normalization Institute, NEN 7345, Leaching characteristics of
soil an stony building and waste materials-leaching test determination of the
leaching of inorganic components from building and monolithic waste
materials with the diffusion test; 1995.
[26] Dutch Building Materials Decree. 1995 (Bouwstoffenbesluit) (nr.12689/165).
The Netherlands Ministry of Housing. Spatial Planning and the Environment
(VROM).
[27] Soil Quality Decree. Besluit van 22 november 2007, houdende regels inzake de
kwaliteit van de bodem (Besluit bodemkwaliteit). Staatsblad; 2007; nr 469.
[28] Netherlands Normalization Institute, NEN 7343, Leaching characteristics of
building and solid waste material, leaching tests, determination of the
leaching of inorganic components from granular materials with the column
test; 1995.
[29] EULFD. Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landll of waste.