Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
|
PENTAGRAM
CIVITAS
TILLOTSON
|
FALLER
MESH
DAVIS
VICKSTROM
ARUP
|
CC&A
PROSPECT PIER
Contents
1 .
2 .
Team
2.1
2.2
3 .
Analysis
3.1
History and Context (St. Pete Cultural Identity)
3.2
Urban Analysis
4 .
Design
4.1
Program Aspiration Checklist
4.2
Activities Calendar
4.3
Urban Concept
4.4
Building Concept
4.5
Branding and Signage Strategy
4.6
The Uplands
4.7
Pier Design
4.8
Planting Palette
4.9
The Pyramid
4.10
Pubic Spaces and Circulation
4.11
Section
4.12
Plans
4.13 Elevations
4.14
Facade
4.15
Sustainability Concepts
4.16
Structure Re-use
4.17
Lighting
5 .
Construction Technologies
5.1 Structure
5.2
Sustainability
6.
7.
EL CASTILLO | 800 AD
PROSPECT PIER
HISTORY
2. Team
2.1 SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PROSPECT PIER
FR-EE
Design Architect
Unai Artetxe
Project Manager
CIVITAS
MESH
ARUP
Landscape Architect
Executive Architect
Engineering
Mark Johnson
Principal-in-Charge
Dan Brodkin
Principal/Structural Engineer
Chris Parezo
Design Principal
Raymond Quinn
Lead Mechanical Engineer
Patrick Green, RA
Project Manager
Gary LaMonica
Electrical Engineer
Igor Kitagorsky
Plumbing Engineer
TILLOTSON
PENTAGR AM
Lighting
Graphic / Interactive
Suzan Tillotson
Principal-In-Charge
Natasha Jen
Partner-In-Charge
Vincent Lee
Civil Engineer
Cameron Thomson
LEED/Sustainability
Sanjeev Malhorta
Geotechnical
Leonie Van Ginkel
Facade
VICKSTROM
FALLER DAVIS
CC& A
Civil
Environmental
Cost Analysis
Daniel Vickstrom
Engineer
Nicole Cribbs
Environmental Scientist
Robert A. Kaupp
Cost Estimator
Bruce Hasbrouck
Environmental Scientist
CORE CONSULTANT TEAM
3. Analysis
3.1 HISTORY AND CONTEXT (ST. PETE CULTURAL IDENTITY)
HISTORY
CONTEXT
5. A Connected, Accessible Downtown + Waterfront Continuous linkages, service oriented parking + transit,
increased public access.
PROSPECT PIER
2023
phase 3
future development
waterfront
= prime real estate
cultural
corridors
marina
2018
phase 2
phase 1
beach +
event space
SECONDARY CONNECTIONS
EDUCATION
PIER+ PYRAMID
UPLANDS INTERVENTION
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
2018
phase 2
waterfront
= prime real estate
cultural
corridors
marina
phase 1
beach +
event space
STUDY OF THE URBAN CONTEXT AND 2ND AVENUE INCLUDING FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY BUILDINGS
RELIGIOUS
PARKING
EDUCATION
PHASE
III CONNECTIONS
SECONDARY
SUNDIAL ST PETE
CULTURAL
futurePROPOSED
developmentCLOSED PATH
PHASE II
waterfront
= prime real estate
cultural
corridors
PHASE I
marina
beach +
event space
1889
1906
1926
10
PROSPECT PIER
1973
1987
2017
MARKETPLACE ADDITION
PROSPECT PIER
11
4. Design
4.1 PROGRAM ASPIRATION CHECKLIST
Through surveys with the local population of St Petersburg, the desired use, programming, and clientele became evident. As
the Prospect
Pier
is designed
people
of St.
Petersburgs continual use through
all seasons,
our team
designed
COMMERCIAL
OR NON
COMMERCIAL
PIER primarily for the
LOCATION
OF PIER
PROGRAMMING
WHO SHOULD
THE PIER PRIMARILY
SERVE
the program directly from these surveys.
13%
A.
7%
B.
14%
C.
D.
E.
F.
28%
21%
An actively ever-changing programmed pier with both indoor and outdoor activities and spaces targeting the local and
visiting population
17%
17%
A place79%
that becomes emblematic of memorable moments
Continuous programming along the full length of the pier and not only at the pier head
Both commercial and recreational uses
54%
49%
Considerable recreational activities for a variety of ages
Transportation options to make the programming more accessible.
COMMERCIAL
AT THE END
BOTH
NON-COMMERCIAL
ON LAND
RESIDENTS
NO OPINION/NOT SURE
BOTH
TOURISTS
NEITHER/NOT SURE
28% 17%
1. Fine dining or destination restaurants 13% 21%
13%
21%
10%
7%
2. Air conditioned
spaces
17%
17%
7%
10%
3. Observation
and 79%
viewing areas
14%
17%
79%
9%
4. World class
14%design that will be a landmark 49%
54%
8.5%
5. Open-air casual dining
49%
8.5%
6. Areas for walking, jogging, and cycling
COMMERCIAL
AT THE END
BOTH
7.5%
7. FishingNON-COMMERCIAL
ON LAND
RESIDENTS
NO OPINION/NOT SURE
BOTH
TOURISTS
7.5%
8. Shopping and retail space
NEITHER/NOT SURE
6%
9. Space for special
events and entertainment
COMMERCIAL
AT THE END
5%LAND
NON-COMMERCIAL
ON
10. Environmental
education
NO OPINION/NOT
SURE
BOTH
OpinionWorks
Survey
(Dec,
2013)
Pier Working Group Survey (July, 2014)
4.5%
11. Boat and watercraft access
NEITHER/NOT SURE
17%
3.5%
1.
Fine
dining
or
destination
restaurants
1. Observation
areas DEC 2013)
12. Amusement
activities
VOTER PREFERENCES
FOR A NEW PIER
(OPINION WORKS
SURVEY,
10%
2. Air conditioned spaces
2. Open-air casual dining
2.5%
13. Snack
barsand
and
fastareas
food
10%
3. Observation
viewing
3. Cycling / Jogging / Walking
9%
4. World class design that will be a landmark
Total
8.5%
5. Open-air casual dining
8.5%
6.OpinionWorks
Areas for walking, jogging,
and (Dec,
cycling 2013)
Survey
RESTAURANTS/RETAIL
7.5%
7. Fishing
7.5%
8. Shopping and retail space
NATURE/SPORTS
1.
Fine
dining
or
destination
restaurants
6%
9. Space for special events and entertainment
OTHERS
5%
10.
education
2.Environmental
Air conditioned
spaces
4.5%
11. Boat and watercraft access
3.
Observation
and
viewing
areas
3.5%
12. Amusement activities
4.Snack
World
design
landmark
13.
barsclass
and fast
food that will be a2.5%
Total
5. Open-air casual dining
6.RESTAURANTS/RETAIL
Areas for walking, jogging, and cycling
NATURE/SPORTS
7.OTHERS
Fishing
8. Shopping and retail space
9. Space for special events and entertainment
10. Environmental education
11. Boat and watercraft access
12. Amusement activities
13. Snack bars and fast food
RESTAURANTS/RETAIL
NATURE/SPORTS
4. Tram / Trolley
100%
5. Fishing
6. Bike / Water rental
7. Courtesy docks
8. Performance stage
17%
9. Flexible event space
10%
10. Marine discovery center
11. Cafe / Snack bar
10%
12. Water taxi
9% 13. Environmental education
14. Picnic area
8.5%
100%
15. Non-motorized Boating
8.5%
16. Shopping
7.5%
17. Community space
18. Fine dining
7.5%
19. Amphitheater
6%
20. Motorized boating
21. Exhibition vessel berth
5%
22. Support retail
4.5%
23. Family entertainment
24. Kiosks
3.5%
25. Spa Beach to Vinoy bridge
2.5%
26. Amusement / Ferris wheel
27. Water park
100%
Total
28. Banquet space
29. Fast food
30. Hotel
REQUIRED
OTHERS
12
PROSPECT PIER
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MORNING
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance buildings.
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Preceding
the design, we analyzed
the potential
uses of the surrounding
The table below
is a speculative
exercise
6
on how the population can explore this new destination.
EVENING
EVENING
AFTERNOON AFTERNOON
MORNING
10
6
12
8
2
10
4
12
6
2
8
4
10
6
Tai Chi
Mayors Breakfast
MONDAY
Pilates
TUESDAY
Stretching
WEDNESDAY
Meditation
THURSDAY
Yoga
FRIDAY
Yoga
Maintenance
Walking Tour
Pilates
Sea Observation
Yoga
Pilates
School Field Trip
Food Fest
School Field Trip
Food Fest
Mangrove walk
Stretching
Kayak Tour
Neighborhood
Meeting
Pilates
Mangrove Walk
Walking Tour
Walking Tour
Mangrove Walk
Pilates
Kayak Tour
Yoga
Farmers Market
Science Lecture
Food Fest
Happy Hour
Food Fest
Daily Movie
Kayak Tour
Blues Night
Stretching
Stand-Up Comedy
Mangrove Walk
Movie Night
Pilates
Wedding Banquet
Paddle Board
Lessons
Shakespeare
Late Fitness
Astronomy Night
Neighborhood
Meeting
Late Fitness
Science Lecture
Museum Night
Happy Hour
Blues
Night
Cultural
Stand-Up Comedy
Food
Nature
Jazz
in the Park
Music
Movie Night
Shakespeare
in the Park
Astronomy Night
Late Fitness
Museum Night
Cocktail Demo
Movie Night
Sea Observation
8
10
Daily Movie
Sports
Late Fitness
Sports
Cultural
Food
Nature
Mangrove walk
Maintenance
Kayak Tour
Meditation
SUNDAY
Yoga
Maintenance
Mirror lake tour
Tai Chi
Kayak Tour
Mirror lake tour
Fishing
SATURDAY
Walking Tour
Maintenance
Farmers Market
Yoga
Paddle Board
Lessons
Walking Tour
Sea Observation
Maintenance
Family Fest
Fishing
Fishing Lessons
Sea Observation
Mangrove Walk
Family Fest
Fishing Lessons
Jazz in the Park
Mangrove Walk
in the Park
Yoga
Cocktail Demo
Wedding Banquet
Movie Night
Music
ANNUAL SCHEDULE
The building lighting system will accommodate celebrations of the citys most festive events.
Grand Prix
of St. Pete
Movies in
the Park
Saturday
Morning
Market
Jan
Feb
Mainsail
Arts Festival
Mar
Grand Prix
of St. Pete
Saturday
Morning
Market
Sunshine
Blues Music
Festival
Jan
Feb
Apr
May
Mar
American
Stage in
the Park
Sunshine
Blues Music
Festival
American
Stage in
the Park
Apr
May
Jun
Movies in
the Park
Jul
Aug
AIDS
Walk
Sept
Oct
Jun
Jul
Aug
Fish-O-Thon
4th of July
Fireworks
Festival of
St. Anthonys
Regata del Sol
States
Triathlon al Sol Fiesta
Sept
Walk
for Life
13
Race for
the Cure
Oct
Paddles Up
Boat Race
Race for
the Cure
Fish-O-Thon
4th of July
Fireworks
First
Night
SnowFest
Ribfest
Florida
Orchestra
in the Park
AVP Beach
Volleyball
Open
Walk
for Life
St. Anthonys
Triathlon
Florida
Orchestra
in the Park
AVP Beach
Volleyball
Open
Mainsail
Arts Festival
Festival of
States
Ribfest
in St. Pete
AIDS
Walk
Paddles Up
Boat Race
First
Night
SnowFest
Nov
Chillounge
Night
Dec
St. Pete
Boat ShowChillounge
Illuminated
Boat Parade
Night
St. Pete
Boat Show
Illuminated
Boat Parade
Mirror
Lake
Children &
Families Dept.
City Hall
Church
Williams Park
Sun
MIRROR
LAKE
CITY BUILDINGS
RELIGIOUS
PARKING
EDUCATION
SECONDARY CONNECTIONS
SUNDIAL ST PETE
CULTURAL
WILLIAMS PARK
PROSPECT PIER
Museum of
Fine Arts
ndial St Pete
Museum of
History
Central
Yacht Basin
Electric Bus
Route
VINOY
PARK
NORTH
STRAUB
PARK
NORTH
YACHT BASIN
2ND AVENUE NE
E DRIVE N
PIONEER
PARK
CENTRAL
YACHT BASIN
BAY SHOR
BEACH DRIVE
NE
SOUTH
STRAUB
PARK
DEMENS
LANDING
PARK
15
Prospect
Pier
1 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION
Demolish the 1980s additions to the
pyramid. Replace a portion of the lost
area by adding new space on top where
it is more valuable.
80s addition
of elevator
80s addition
of retail space
2 STRUCTURE RE-USE
Extend the structure in order to achieve
a purer shape and accommodate
desired programmatic functions.
80s addition
Existing first floor level of4.5
Feet
in order
retail
space
to elevate the building above the flood
zone and accommodate potential sea
level rise during the next century.
d extension of structure,
and have more valuable
extra shading
extra shading
3
5
observation
area
3 LANDSCAPE
bar
education
wing
city place
virtural aquarium
16
flood elevation
bayside place
marine diversity
restroom
restaurant
snack shack
storage
PROSPECT PIER
3
5
Building surroundings
pyramid base and prov
activities such as fishi
water, and contemplat
observation area
s addition
tail space
city observation
extra shading
extra shading
cafeter
4 CANOPY
education
Extend the exterior walls and roof
to
wing
provide shade for outdoor
city placeactivities onmarine diversity
the pier head in addition to increasing the
open air lob
size of the rooftop observation deck.
restroom
bar
education
wing
city place
virtural aquarium
marine diversity
snack shack
storage
restaurant
solar panel
5 PUBLIC SPACE
Organize the interior of the pyramid as
a natural ascension through the piers
functional spaces via a grand central
water plaza
stairwell that is the culmination of the 2nd
avenue promenade. Tilt the roof structure
flood elevation
bayside place
to the west providing spectacular views
of skyline and sunsets.
solar panel
snack shack
vegetated roof
rainwater capture
through enlarged roof
LED lighting
natural ventilation
17
6 ICON OF SUSTAINABILITY
Integrate a sophisticated faade
design and sustainability strategy to
further enhance the iconic character
of the building while maximizing its
performance.
18
PROSPECT PIER
AERIAL VIEW
19
20
PROSPECT PIER
21
22
PROSPECT PIER
23
6
2
TURF LAWN
WITH PALMS
ALLEE
SPA
5
1
2
6
4
24
PROSPECT PIER
THE THRESHOLD
Situated between Spa Beach and the Event Lawn, the Threshold is the ceremonial entrance to the Pier. Demarcated by
inwardly tilted lawn planes, the Threshold frames the distant view to the Pyramid while referencing the sky and the open and
expansive nature of the bay. It is designed to be beautiful and functional, connecting the Uplands to the new Pier elevation, as
well as connecting Spa Beach and the Event Lawn with a series of terraced beach and lawn planes.
PHASE 1
/ VIEW TO PYRAMID
EXISTING PIER
PROPOSED PIER
PALM GROVE,
CRUSHED SHELL BEACH
BEACH
PHASE 1
SLOPED LAWN
(FRAMES VIEW TO PYRAMID)
GE
7
5
ENTRY PLAZA
RENOVATED PARKING
SPLASH PAD
TERRACED BEACH
TRANSIENT DOCKS
25
SHAKESPEARE
IN THE PARK
MUSEUM
NIGHT
SCHOOL
FIELD TRIP
MANGROVE
WALK
KAYAK
TOUR
PADDLE
BOARD
BIKE
PATH
ELECTRIC BUS
STOP
PARKING
26
BIKE
RENTAL
CAFE
PROSPECT PIER
volleyball nets and lawn games and temporary kayak and paddle boat rental center, with water access from the new transient
dock located to the south, until a dedicated boat rental facility is built.
5. PALM GROVE CRUSHED SHELL BEACH
This crushed shell environment will create a visually distinctive floor that is excellent for hosting public events, strolling and
relaxing. This feature offers sand volleyball facilities and movable furnishings that allow for people sit and enjoy the bay and
beach activities.
6. COMPACTED BEACH TERRACES
Transitioning the vertical difference of the Pier to the Spa Beach is a series of terraces beach planes that are separated by
concrete seat walls. This environment offers beach visitors flattened beach environments in an elevated position to enhance
views and the water experience. The terraces will offer movable shade umbrellas that add a pop of color and atmosphere to the
beach.
7. THE TERRACED LAWN PANELS
On the opposite side of the pier ramp is the terraced lawn panels. Like the compacted beach panels the lawn terraces vertically
transition the Pier ramp down to the Events Lawn environment. Offering a wide array of park uses such as picnicking, elevated
concert viewing and views to the boat slips, the terraces are pivotal to the park function.
8. THE EVENTS LAWN
The Events Lawn, edged by a continuous bay walk is a two acre living room of the community. This space is designed to host
multiple public events with a wide range of scale and capability. The space features a grand open lawn that can support music
festivals, pick-up sports, arts and crafts fairs, movie nights and community gathering. A grand stage is located on south edge
of the space against a dramatic backdrop of the transient boat dock marina. This location takes advantage of the terraced
lawn steps as elevated viewing platforms and allows all passers-by on the pier approach to have an elevated view of all events.
PICNIC
VOLLEYBALL
MEDITATION
YOGA
FITNESS
CHILDRENS
PLAY
JOGGING
CYCLING
FISHING
SEA
OBSERVATION
ASTRONOMY
NIGHT
FISHING
SPA BEACH
7
PICNIC
8
ELECTRIC BUS
STOP
JAZZ IN
THE PARK
TAI CHI
WATER
TAXI
BLUES
NIGHT
FOOD
FEST
BIKE
RENTAL
SCIENCE
LECTURE
HAPPY
HOUR
COCKTAIL
DEMO
FARMERS
MARKET
BOATING
SPORTS
27
CULTURAL
FOOD
NATURE
MUSIC
RE D
SHO
BAY
BE A
CH
DRI
VE N
RIVE
NE
2ND AVENUE NE
28
PROSPECT PIER
29
AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION
TROLLEY CIRCULATION
30
PROSPECT PIER
BICYCLE CIRCULATION
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
31
45
PRAIRIE
EXIST
GRASS
WALK
+
PALM TREES
BIKE
PATH
DRIVE
LANE
DRIVE
LANE
PRAIRIE
GRASS
+
PALM
TREES
EXIST
WALK
EXIST PARKING
45
EXISTING CURB TO CURB
45
LIVE OAK FOREST
PIER
APPROACH
32
PROSPECT PIER
2 3 4 5
45
PALM TREE GROVE
PIER
APPROACH
BEACH
26.50
45
SLOPED
LAWN
PIER
APPROACH
33
26.50
10
SLOPED TERRACED
LAWN
LAWN
STEPS
EVENT
LAWN
2 3 4 5
BEACH
45
75
PIER
APPROACH
EVENT
LAWN
10.5
24
EDGE PROMENADE
45
PIER
34
10.5
EDGE
The 24 wide promenade is primarily a pedestrian/
bicycle zone. Trolleys will provide frequent service
between the pier and downtown. Service vehicles will
be limited to early mornings on a scheduled basis.
BLANKET (6X6)
FOOD TRUCK
STAGE
FOOD TRUCK
STAGE
10X10 TENT
TEMPORARY LOADING/UNLOADING
35
PROSPECT PIER
E T E R
I E R
0
9-
.C
C
PA
.S
8-
IN
/2
8 -1
C
SE
TIO
END POST
3/4, 316l S.S. STRUCTURAL
FINS
PANEL
316l S.S. CABLE MESH
TOP RAIL
EXTRUDED RECYCLE
ALUMINUM
36
PROSPECT PIER
SHADE STRUCTURES
FISHING STATIONS
37
38
PROSPECT PIER
ENTRY PALMS
PALM GROVE
UPLANDS LANDSCAPE
PRAIRIE GRASSES
TURF 1
TURF 2
CRUSHED SHELLS
40
PROSPECT PIER
PRAIRIE GRASSES
MUHLY GRASS,
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
CORDGRASS,
SPARTINA BAKERI
PERENNIAL PEANUT,
ARACHIS GLABRATA
TURF 1
TURF 2
SEASHORE PASPALUM,
PASPALUM VAGINATUM
BAHIAGRASS,
PASPALUM NOTATUM
CRUSHED SHELLS
CRUSHED SHELLS
41
MUHLY GRASS
CORDGRASS
WHITE FOUNTAIN GRASS
42
PROSPECT PIER
MUHLY
MUHLY GRASS,
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
CORDGRASS
44
PROSPECT PIER
45
FALL
SUMMER
WINTER
SPRING
PROSPECT TERRACE
BAYSIDE PLACE
CITY PLACE
46
PROSPECT PIER
47
4.11 SECTION
PROSPECT TERRACE
OBSERVATION AREA
BAR
EDUCATION
WING
CITY PLACE
RESTROOMS
48
PROSPECT PIER
OBSERVATION AREA
RESTAURANT
VIRTUAL AQUARIUM
BAYSIDE PLACE
RESTROOMS
0
49
15 ft
30 ft
50
PROSPECT PIER
4.12 PLANS
Bait store
Electrical room
Water
reservoir
+
Water
treatment
plan
City Place
Open Air
Lower
Lobby
Bike rental
Bayside Place
Snack Shack
Storage
Cafeteria
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas
2700 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
Retail
2800 SQ. FT.
Mechanical
3200 SQ. FT.
PIER HEAD
Pier Head
51,200 SQ. FT.
Fishing Platforms
9,400 SQ. FT.
TOTAL PIER HEAD 60,600 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 9,900 SQ. FT.
Service Access
(1st Floor)
Lobby
City Place
Bayside Place
Cafeteria
(1st Floor)
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas
2700 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 3,900 SQ. FT.
52
PROSPECT PIER
ACCESS
LOBBY
53
54
PROSPECT PIER
Coast
Office Space
Marine Diversity
Lobby
Marine
Introduction Discovery
Center
Institutions
Shop
Educational Programs
Virtual aquarium
Hologram and projection
space
AREAS
Marine discovery Center
5940 SQ. FT.
Common areas
1260 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 8,400 SQ. FT.
Interactive
area
Auditorium
AREAS
Marine discovery Center
12050 SQ. FT.
Common areas
1550 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 14,800 SQ. FT.
56
Foyer
PROSPECT PIER
SHOP
Banquet
space
(200 seats)
Prospect
Terrace
Outdoor
cafe
(30 seats)
Outdoor dinning
(40 seats)
AREAS
Destination restaurant & Banquet space
9230 SQ. FT.
Common areas
10370 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 20,800 SQ. FT.
Prospect
Terrace
AREAS
Exterior Terrace
16600 SQ. FT.
58
Kitchen
Destination
restaurant
(100 seats)
Bar
PROSPECT PIER
RESTAURANT
59
60
PROSPECT PIER
PROSPECT PIER
4.13 ELEVATIONS
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
64
PROSPECT PIER
EAST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
65
4.14 FACADE
MATERIALS
Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Glass fiber reinforced concrete (GFRC) cladding is composed of a cement: sand
(typically 1:1) matrix with 2-5% volume of glass fibers added. These fibers are
a special Alkali Resistant Glass (ARG) to resist deterioration of the glass under
exposure to the cement. Further resistance to damage is achieved with mineral and
organic polymer additions.
Typical Use: Cladding panels where high level of detailing and a minimum thickness is required. Used for small non-structural
panels, and typically fixed onto a backing frame or regular substrate. Panels may be also formed with ribs molded in to allow
self-spanning behavior.
Manufacture: GRC panels can be manufactured in two ways:
- Spraying - which allows higher fiber content and makes thin sections.
- Casting - remix with max fiber content 3.5% and cast as for concrete.
Moldable and non-flat panels can be made; repetition in formwork molds essential for economic reasons. We will look to
recent developments in concrete formwork to devise a strategy with the contractor.
Durability: As there is no steel reinforcement present, GFRC panels have proved corrosion resistance in a marine environment.
GFRC products have low water, water vapor and air permeability, providing a durability against abrasion, chemical attack,
corrosion and ultra-violet radiation. They are also non-combustible.
FACADE ASSEMBLY
GLAZING SYSTEM
EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING COLUMNS
GFRC LOUVERS
METAL BRACKETS
PROSPECT PIER
FACADE ILLUMINATION
GLAZING SYSTEM
EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING COLUMNS
FACADE LIGHTING
PYRAMID GENERAL ILLUMINATION
4
STEP LIGHTS
FOR LOW LEVEL WALKWAY LIGHTING
GFRC LOUVERS
3-2
METAL BRACKETS
1-4
1-4
seating / step
25mm continuous flangeless
linear white LED
(HESS LEDIA LL)
glazing
concrete louver
67
Conditioning Zone
Highly Conditioned
Moderately Conditioned
ASHRAE 55 Adaptative Comfort
Unconditioned
Reusing Structure
Avoid sending large volumes of waste to landfill
and consuming new materials
Low-Flow Fixtures
Reduce water usage and discharge
Rainwater Harvesting
Water flowing from the roof will be directed into a
tank within the building where it will be treated and
re-used as non-potable water
68
PROSPECT PIER
LED Lighting
Efficient LED light fixtures shall be used to further
conserve energy and limit contribution to landfill due
to the long life of the lamps
Natural Ventilation
Utilize adaptive comfort in flex spaces to reduce
HVAC loads
Mixed Mode
Use HVAC systems only when necessary, and allow
opening of windows and auto-system shutoff during
optimal conditions
Battery
69
10
11
12
6TH LEVEL
5TH LEVEL
NEW STRUCTURE
4TH LEVEL
REINFORCED STRUCTURE
3 LEVEL
EXISTING STRUCTURE
RD
2ND LEVEL
PIER LEVEL
MEAN SEA LEVEL
SEA BED
SECTION
PLAN
70
10
11
12
PROSPECT PIER
1
NEW BEAMS SPAN DIRECTLY BETWEEN
THE CORE AND PERIMETER IN ORDER TO
AVOID ADDING NEW LOAD ONTO
EXISTING INTERIOR FRAMING
2
NEW PERIMETER COLUMNS
TRANSFER THE LOAD TO THE
EXISTING PERIMETER COLUMNS
3
EXISTING PERIMETER SLOPING
COLUMNS GET REINFORCED FOR
THE ADDED ROOF LOAD
71
4.17 LIGHTING
CONNECTING CITY TO PYRAMID
custom street lighting element
city
museums
DEFINITION
path lights
AMBIENT
tree uplights for soft
glow and sparkle
2nd ave.
park
72
approach
LOW LEVEL
rail lights, shade uplighting,
+ bench underlighting for
unobstructed views of water
pier
BEACON
glow from pyramid as
focal point for pier
pyramid
PROSPECT PIER
2ND AVE.
PIER
LOW LIGHT LEVEL
waters edge
PIER SECTION
water
PIER PLAN
73
74
PROSPECT PIER
NIGHT VIEW
75
5. Construction Technologies
5.1 STRUCTURE
COMPOSITE ELASTOMERIC
BEARING PADS
FOUNDATIONS
The existing structure uses steel H-pile foundations to transfer its gravity and lateral loads to the ground and the new scheme
aims to reuse the existing foundations. The higher building height and increased width increase the projected area of the
building exposed to the wind and consequently increase the load demands on the foundations. While, current estimates show
that the perimeter piles may be overstressed by as much as 35 percent under certain wind events, we anticipate that a detailed
review of existing construction data could demonstrate that the piles have adequate capacity. This review would include a
review of existing pile load tests, pile driving records and pile hammer information as well as a corrosion assessment and wave
equation analyses of the piles using actual driving data. In the event that such investigation does not justify sufficient capacity,
the retrofit strategy would be to connect the existing caissons to the new pier head piles via grade beams. Depending on the
results of the corrosion assessment, corrosion protection measures such as cathodic protection may be required.
76
PROSPECT PIER
32-0
0
128-0
64-0
PILING PLAN
BRIDGE
The existing pier is the most typical way to construct piers
and the structure selection is driven by two reasons. The
short spans and driven piles allow for leap-frog construction
avoiding marine equipment. Leap frog construction is
when the next span is constructed from a crane sitting on
a previously constructed span (even small piles as the ones
put forward can be driven off the bridge if design correctly).
The integral detailing (beams on the same level as pier
caps with piles or pier caps acting as shelves) allow for a
durable solution in the abrasive marine environment while
accommodating easy construction of laying light beams
down first and then casting concrete pockets after to make
composite.
The solution was further refined to allow for drilled shafts
which reduce the noise during construction. The shafts
are more expensive to construct as they require marine
equipment, but their higher capacity reduce the foundation
footprint by 45% (making them a great environmental option)
and make them cost competitive with the driven piles.
The framing of both drilled and driven shaft solutions
(20ft/40ft) spans allows to completely avoid existing (20ft
spacing) foundation footprint. This is desirable for many
PYRAMID SUPERSTRUCTURE
The main ambition of the structural scheme for the proposed
building structure is to enable the architectural vision with
the least intervention to the existing structure as possible.
Based on current engineering reports provided by the city
the existing super structure appears to be in good condition
and capable of sustaining current building code loads. The
existing load path provided in the building directs all gravity
loads from the concrete slabs to the existing floor beams
which in turn transfer it to the interior columns, which lead it
to the exterior sloping columns and then compile it all in the
elevator cores at Level 2. (See Figure 1)
This load path manages to maintain most of the gravity
load in either the perimeter sloping columns or the elevator
cores and then congregates all of the gravity load into the
concrete cores at Level 2 which then lead it to the core
foundations and into the ground. Our aim is to respect this
force flow and redirect any new gravity load to the elevator
cores and perimeter columns. This will avoid any interface
with the existing interior columns and avoid reinforcement of
interior building elements, keeping any reinforcement work
to the perimeter of the building. This will be accomplished
by using long span floor trusses which span the whole way
between the building cores and perimeter columns. Below
is a diagram illustrating this as well as one illustrating the
increase in load in the perimeter columns and concrete
cores. (See Figure 2 & 4)
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
The new scheme for the building supports the lateral loads in
much the same way. However, since the projected elevation
area of the building has increased the total wind load to
which the building is exposed is considerably higher. The
higher load as well as its higher elevation of application
increase the shear and moment demands on the concrete
cores. In order to verify that the existing cores will be able
to sustain the new loads, we performed a section analysis
of the cores for the new axial and moment demands. (See
Figure 6)
78
FIGURE 3
PROSPECT PIER
INCREASED LOAD
IN STRUCTURAL
CORES
INCREASED
LOADS IN SLOPED
COLUMN
FIGURE 4
FOUR INDEPENDENT
CORES RESIST THE
LATERAL LOADING IN
FLEXURE AND SHEAR
LARGER PROJECTED
AREA INCREASES
SIGNIFICANTLY
THE
LARGER PROJECTED
AREAWIND
INCREASES
THE
LOAD
ONSIGNIFICANTLY
THE BUILDING
WIND LOAD ON THE BUILDING
FOUR
INDEPENDENT
FOUR INDEPENDENT
CORES
THE
CORES RESISTRESIST
THE
LATERAL
LOADING
IN
LATERAL LOADING
IN
FLEXURE
AND SHEAR
FLEXURE AND SHEAR
LOAD
PATH
NEWLY
LOAD PATH
FORFOR
NEWLY
ADDED
ADDED
PROJECTED
AREA
PROJECTED
AREA ONTO EXISTING
ONTO EXISTING
STRUCTURE
STRUCTURE
FIGURE 5
UNCONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS OF
THE CORE CAPACITY
CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS OF
THE CORE CAPACITY
FIGURE 6
79
5.2 SUSTAINABILITY
The redevelopment of St Petersburg Pier provides a great opportunity to integrate sustainability holistically in the pier and its
buildings as a public project. Its relative isolation at the end of the pier makes sustainability a key imperative as utilities need to
be transported further and are exposed to the harsh maritime climate.
By reusing the building and much of the pier we are already making a significant impact by not sending large volumes of waste
to landfill and consuming new materials.
Our design also works with the climate to take advantage of the constant winds to provide cooling without less mechanical
energy in various spaces. Working with the buildings unique inverted pyramid design we provide shading to facades to reduce
heating loads while maximizing the roof area for power generation from photovoltaics. The redevelopment of the pier also
provides a potential opportunity to incorporate heat rejecting (for cooling) into the bay which will reduce our energy use further.
We will also capture water for reuse within the building.
Sustainability has also been incorporated into the wider development with the introduction of public transport facilities
including electric buses and bike facilities. More green spaces will also private greater public amenity as well as shelter and
cooling effect for visitors.
1 ENERGY
Energy consumption is a critical part of any sustainability strategy for a building. Our focus here has been to work with the
climate to reduce energy consumption then produce power with renewable sources.
1.1 ADAPTIVE COMFORT
For over 50 years public buildings HVAC systems have been designed around the principal of: Keep everything at
approximately 21oC and 55% Relative Humidity (RH).
OCCUPANT
COMFORT
ECONOMIC
VIABILITY
UNOBTRUSIVE
ENERGY
EFFICIENT
80
PROSPECT PIER
Using adaptive comfort criteria for the St Petersburg Pier, some spaces can use outside air with little to no mechanical heating
or cooling for about 40% of the year. There are certain areas within the St. Petersburg Pier building where comfort conditions
can be relaxed due to the activities that will be carried in this spaces.
Dehumidification of outside air will be required for some spaces. The heating required for the spaces during the coldest part
of the year will help bring Relative humidity levels back inside the limits meaning less specialized air conditioning will be
required. Using outside air for free cooling may be a viable option during some hours of the year.
1.2 HVAC STRATEGY
The building will be served by a modular air cooled chiller system, providing 150tons (5-duty modules) of 44F chilled water
through duty-standby 300gpm variable primary pumps. These chillers will be located on the roof of the building, and can be
concealed by vegetation. Normally, the vertical discharge of the condensing fans cannot be obstructed. However, these is also
an option to use heat rejection to the bay instead (see next section). Building heating will be through a single natural gas fired
750mbh condensing boiler, which must be located in a rated enclosure.
Interior conditioning will be through two modular VAV indoor air handling units with airside economizer. A 20,000cfm unit will
serve the restaurant, and a 22,000cfm unit will serve the remainder of the spaces. Cooling will be through chilled water coils.
Heating will be through hot water preheat coils in the AHUs and heating coils in the VAV boxes.
Space conditioning will be through VAV terminal boxes to serve the separate zones. Each VAV box will be provided with a
temperature sensor. A central building automation system (BAS) will control all components of the HVAC system.
VAV / CAV
FREE COOLING POSSIBLE
COOLING UP TO 120 W/M2
LARGE FAN ENERGY LOADS
All AHU cooling coils and chiller condenser coils shall be copper-copper or be copper-aluminum with Electrofin coating.
The initial loads are based on the following:
81
Solar photovoltaics on the roof will provide a canopy, shading occupants in some areas. Approximately 8,000 10,000 ft2 of
PV will provide approximately 180,000 kWh/yr in electricity for the building. This equates to approximately 25% of the buildings
energy load. The system will still be grid connected but the PV system will reduce operational cost and potentially generate
income through net metering. The array will face South and be tilted at least 5 to allow water to drain from the panels.
PROSPECT PIER
Despite reducing the heat gains due to radiation, a high-performance envelope will still be incorporated where the building is
enclosed to reducing the energy consumption.
Given the high amount of roof area and strength of solar radiation, a cool roof (highly-reflective roof) or potentially green roof
system is an easy and effective strategy to mitigate solar gains.
Providing insulation, and thereby reducing the U-value (conductance) of key building envelope components (roof and wall,
specifically) will also reduce cooling loads.
The following figures show the percentage of hours each surface is shaded on an average summer and winter day and show
the effectives of keeping the inverted pyramid design.
The glare effects from water should not be a concern. Water typically reflects 20% of solar load as it tends to scatter the light.
In terms of glare, water does increase glare but it can be a pleasant effect. Its distance from the water will also reduce this
effect.
The following figures show the percentage of hours the outdoor sloped areas are shaded on an average summer and winter
day.
2 WATER STRATEGY
The Pier water strategy is focused on reducing potable water used in the building and capturing run-off and rainwater for
irrigation and other non-potable uses.
Water consumption in the building will be reduced at least 20% from a base design scenario by integrating low flow fixtures
and incorporating metering and sub-metering to determine the amount of water required by a specific use, building tenant or
central use.
Rainwater from the roof will be collected and used for non-potable uses such as toilet flushing, irrigation and maintenance. The
rainwater tank will be located at the bottom of the structure.
The project shall include a comprehensive, integrated hydrology strategy to reduce runoff and the burden on the municipal
system. The design will include green infrastructure systems such as bioswales, rain gardens, permeable pavements and
green roofs that contribute to runoff reduction. These are intended to ensure that both the waters discharged from the system
meet water quality requirements, while attenuating the peak flows associated with large storm events.
84
PROSPECT PIER
85
In addition to providing strategies for achieving a green building, LEED certification can also be used as a marketing tool, since
the project will acquire advantage over competitors and third-party validation of its sustainable accomplishments.
LEED promotes best practices in:
A framework for assessing design options early in the design process, and
A rating system for final building certification.
Since LEED is a performance based set of criteria, there are numerous design strategy options that will meet the LEED
requirements. This design guideline for St. Petersburg Pier, will use the LEED criteria to track design strategy as a decision
making tool to keep the project on the sustainable design track. After considering different options for the LEED certification
process for this project, we reached the conclusion that LEED- Major Renovation is best suited for the project. As per the LEED
Reference guide, a major renovation involves major HVAC renovation, significant envelope modifications, and major interior
rehabilitation. St. Petersburg Pier upgrade will maintain the existing structure but the faade will be dismounted, and replaced
with a high energy performance envelope, as well as all of the systems and interiors of the building.
This design guideline will contain all the specific requirements for the design and construction teams to develop a building that
can achieve the desired level of certification following the standard certification process:
The goal desired for this project is to achieve LEED Gold rating under the LEED-Major Renovations v2009.
The goal desired for this project is to achievee LEED Golld rating undder the LEED
D-Major
Renovatiions v2009.
LEED
D Initiall assessm
ment
ARUPs detailed assessment reviews individual compliance of each LEED credit and pre-requisite and it is based on information
This deta
ailed initial
assessment
a credit requirements
reviews indiv
vidual
comp
liancestatus
of eacchand
LEED
creedit and pre-currently available. The following
sections
outline
and their
current
intent.
Po
oints
Yes
60
Maybe
29
Not a target
21
Total po
ossible crediits
110
1
86
LEED
Certificattion
40-49
LEED Sillver
50-59
LEED Goold
60-79
LEED Plaatinum
80-110
PROSPECT PIER
Project Status
5.2
LEED Credits
Each individual credit has been assessed in this section for each LEED category.
Each individual credit has been assessed in this section for each LEED category.
The individual credit intent, the compliance requirements, the potential and assigned score, credit status and action plan are
The individual credit intent, the compliance requirements, the potential and assigned score, credit
included in each credit assessment.
Yes:achieved
credits already
achieved
with
the current
designwe
or believe
credits we
believe
the
Yes: Credits already
with the
current
design
or credits
that,
giventhat,
the given
characteristics
and nature of the
characteristics
and
nature
of
the
project,
should
be
achieved
(These
credits
will
require
the
project, should be achieved (These credits will require the design team and contractor to provide supporting
documentation to
design team
andthe
contractor
to provide
supporting documentation to demonstrate compliance
demonstrate compliance
during
certification
process).
during the certification process).
Maybe:
credits
which
require more
to be
feasibility
Maybe: Credits which
require
more
information
to beinformation
assessed or
its assessed
feasibilityorisitsstill
unclear.is still unclear.
Not a target: Credits that are not feasible to be implemented due to site and/or building design characteristics.
87
88
PROSPECT PIER
89
The FR-EE team will address the design of Prospect Pier for compliance with the demolition permit application currently under
review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the existing construction permit obtained from the Southwest Florida
Water Management District (SWFWMD), and the permitting requirements by the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Code.
The placement of pier demolition material will require a dredge and fill permit from the USACE as concrete rubble is considered
fill. The project team will prepare a Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 permit application for the placement
of the demolition material. The application accurately and thoroughly will present the project approach, the function and
values of the unconsolidated bottom, and the benefits provided by the viable substrate. The assessment will include detailed
documentation of the existing seagrass beds and a thorough discussion of the various project elements and the avoidance of
impacts from construction activities and final configuration of Prospect Pier. Our biologists have extensive experience with the
permitting of artificial reefs, concrete breakwaters, fishing piers, and bridges.
The SWFWMD permit issued was based on the previous pier design and included 0.03 acres of seagrass impacts. Prospect
Pier does not include any seagrass impacts. As a result, a permit modification will be submitted to document the reduction
in impacts. It is anticipated the demolition of the existing pier approaches will be in compliance with the existing SWFWMD
permit. Additionally, the surface water management system proposed by the project team is consistent with the existing
SWFWMD permit and will still qualify for the waiver for certification of compliance with state water quality standards under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341.
Pinellas County Commercial and Multi-use Dock permit applications will be prepared for the wet slips and a Pinellas County
Water and Navigation Dredge and Fill permit application will be prepared for the pier and the disposal of the concrete
demolition material.
FR-EEs project team will assess the option of placing the clean concrete substructure and decking for ecological restoration
at a site just north of the Pier and adjacent to North Shore Park. The area shown in the figure on the opposite page is
approximately 92,000 square feet. A report presented in 2005 assessed the ecological values of selected dredge holes
in Tampa Bay. The report concluded that the location identified as North Shore was described as the most degraded
biologically. According to the report, the site is generally 12 feet deep. The placement of material will provide viable artificial
reef habitat.
Benthic surveys will be performed by qualified biologists to assure additional seagrass areas have not become established
since the July 19, 2012 survey. This effort will avoid unexpected permit compliance issues during construction.
Clear construction documents will be prepared to provide specific approaches for Skanska for the avoidance of impacts to
adjacent seagrasses, including secondary impacts from activities such as dewatering, pile driving, barge and other water craft
staging and access.
90
PROSPECT PIER
NORTH SHORE
91
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
Type 1B, fully sprinklered
OCCUPANCY GROUPS
A2 and A3
PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
13.25 (NAVD 88). The lowest horizontal structural member is at elevation 10.71. Because this is a Category III building (as
defined by ASCE 24-05) the lowest horizontal structural member is required to be at 9.74 (base flood elevation of 7.74 + 2.00).
OCCUPANT LOAD
1st Floor: 90
2nd Floor: 0
3rd Floor: 110
4th Floor: 320
5th Floor: 600
Total: 1,120
BUILDING HEIGHT
72 feet above the pier deck
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The renovated building has a total of 47,400 square feet of interior space and 27,000 square feet of outdoor terrace (not
including the pier and pier head). At one space per 500 square feet, the building will require 149 parking spaces including 5
handicap accessible spaces. The existing Dolphin parking lot on the Uplands has 312 spaces thereby meeting the minimum
parking requirements. The Dolphin lot also has several parking spaces for large vehicles such as school buses. The Pelican
parking lot has been eliminated in favor of a new 5-acre park. Parking on the pier has also been eliminated.
92
PROSPECT PIER
93
226,000 SQ.FT.
Existing Pier
Proposed Pier
100 45
64-0
0
32-0
96-0
32-0
32-0
0
94
128-0
64-0
32-0
0
96-0
64-0
128-0
64-0
0
32-0
96-0
PROSPECT PIER
128-0
64-0
The proposed roof area of the renovated pyramid will be 35,800 square feet.
EAST ELEVATION
9,650 SQ.FT.
NORTH ELEVATION
8,620 SQ.FT.
95
EAST ELEVATION
9,650 SQ.FT.
NORTH ELEVATION
8,620 SQ.FT.
96
PROSPECT PIER
97
ATLAS SHEET
98
PROSPECT PIER
99
Bait store
Electrical room
Water
reservoir
+
Water
treatment
plan
City Place
Open Air
Lower
Lobby
Bike rental
Snack Shack
Cafeteria
INDOOR AREAS
Common areas
2700 SQ. FT.
Core
1200 SQ. FT.
Retail
2800 SQ. FT.
Mechanical
3200 SQ. FT.
Bayside Place
PIER HEAD
Pier Head
51,200 SQ. FT.
Fishing Platforms
9,400 SQ. FT.
TOTAL PIER HEAD 60,600 SQ. FT.
TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 9,900 SQ. FT.
100
Storage
PROSPECT PIER
MECHANICAL
The building will be served by a modular air cooled chiller system, providing 150tons (5-duty modules) of 44F chilled water
through duty-standby 300gpm variable primary pumps. These chillers will be located on the roof of the building, and can be
concealed by vegetation, but the vertical discharge of the condensing fans cannot be obstructed. Building heating will be
through a single natural gas fired 750mbh condensing boiler, which must be located in a rated enclosure.
Interior conditioning will be through two modular VAV indoor air handling units with airside economizer. A 20,000cfm unit will
serve the restaurant, and a 22,000cfm unit will serve the remainder of the spaces. Cooling will be through chilled water coils.
Heating will be through hot water preheat coils in the AHUs and heating coils in the VAV boxes.
Space conditioning will be through VAV terminal boxes to serve the separate zones. Each VAV box will be provided with a
temperature sensor. A central building automation system (BAS) will control all components of the HVAC system.
All AHU cooling coils and chiller condenser coils shall be copper-copper or be copper-aluminum with Electrofin coating.
The initial loads are based on the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Banquet
space
(200 seats)
Prospect
Terrace
Prospect
Terrace
REAS
estination restaurant & Banquet space
230 SQ. FT.
ommon areas
0370 SQ. FT.
ore
OSA Intake Louvers: 120 SF total
200 SQ. FT.
(assuming 50% free area)
OTAL 20,800 SQ. FT.
Outdoor
cafe
(30 seats)
Outdoor dinning
(40 seats)
Kitchen
Bar
Destination
restaurant
(100 seats)
AREAS
Exterior Terrace
16600 SQ. FT.
101
Boiler in enclosed,
rated boil room
(2.98 x 4.07)
102
PROSPECT PIER
Petersburg Prospect
Pier
ST.St.
PETERSBURG
PROSPECT
PIER AREA ANALYSIS
Area Analysis
Area
PIER
Pier bridge
Pier head
Subtotal
48,000 s.f.
60,600 s.f.
108,600 s.f.
1ST FLOOR
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Subtotal
4,800 s.f.
5,100 s.f.
9,900 s.f.
2ND FLOOR
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Subtotal
500 s.f.
3,400 s.f.
3,900 s.f.
3RD FLOOR
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Subtotal
6,300 s.f.
2,100 s.f.
8,400 s.f.
4TH FLOOR
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Subtotal
12,000 s.f.
2,800 s.f.
14,800 s.f.
5TH FLOOR
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Exterior Terrace
Subtotal
9,200
1,200
10,400
20,800
6TH FLOOR
Exterior Terrace
Subtotal
16,600 s.f.
16,600 s.f.
TOTALS
Air-conditioned space
Non-conditioned space
Exterior Terrace
Subtotal
32,800
14,600
27,000
74,400
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
s.f.
103
2014
January
February
10
11
March
12
13
14
15
April
16
17
18
19
20
May
21
22
23
24
June
25
26
27
28
July
29
30
31
32
33
August
34
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4
37
38
39
40
41
42
October
43
44
45
46
November
47
48
49
50
51
December
52
January
2015
February
10
11
12
13
14
March
15
16
17
18
April
19
20
21
22
May
23
24
25
26
27
June
28
29
30
31
July
32
33
34
35
August
36
37
38
39
40
September
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4
41
42
43
October
44
45
46
47
48
November
49
50
51
52
December
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Selection
ublic Input/ Vot
Ranking
Council Approval
Negotiate A/E Contract
2016
January
February
10
11
March
12
13
14
15
April
16
17
18
19
20
May
21
22
23
24
June
25
26
27
28
July
29
30
31
32
33
August
34
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4
35
36
37
38
September
39
40
41
42
October
43
44
45
46
November
47
48
49
50
51
December
52
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
2017
January
February
10
11
March
12
13
14
15
April
16
17
18
19
20
May
21
22
23
24
June
25
26
27
28
July
29
30
31
32
33
August
34
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4
35
36
37
38
September
39
40
41
42
October
43
44
45
46
November
47
48
49
50
51
December
52
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
Construction
Close Out
Grand Opening
1
2018
36
September
35
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
January
February
10
11
March
12
13
14
15
April
16
17
18
19
20
May
21
22
23
24
June
25
26
27
28
July
29
30
31
32
33
August
34
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4
104
35
36
37
38
September
39
40
41
42
October
43
44
45
46
November
47
48
49
50
51
December
52
wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk1 wk2 wk3 wk4 wk5
PROSPECT PIER
SCHEDULE OF VALUES
A
Total GSF/
Component GSF
436,000
COMPONENT VALUES
Unit Cost
($/unit or %)
Quantity
DIVISION
DESCRIPTION
Comments
Cost/SF
DxE
F/B
2A
Site Demolition
1 $
208,500
$208,500
$0.48
2A
Selective Demolition
1 $
457,330
$457,330
$1.05
2B
1 $
2,492,250
$2,492,250
$5.72
3A
Structural Concrete/
1 $
17,416,009
$17,416,009
$39.94
3B
Exterior Concrete
w/above
Masonry
w/above
$0
280,000
108,600
47,400
Uplands
The Pyramid
Base Design
Cost
$208,500
$208,500
$457,330
$457,330
$2,492,250
$2,492,250
$12,146,857
$5,269,152
$17,416,009
$0.00
$0
$0
$0.00
$0
$0
$0.00
$0
500,750
$500,750
$1.15
$500,750
$500,750
1 $
3,695,511
$3,695,511
$8.48
$3,695,511
$3,695,511
1 $
375,000
$375,000
$0.86
$375,000
$375,000
1 $
254,250
$254,250
$0.58
$254,250
$254,250
1 $
278,244
$278,244
$0.64
$278,244
$278,244
23
1 $
516,800
$516,800
$1.19
$516,800
$516,800
26
1 $
960,950
$960,950
$2.20
$960,950
$960,950
99
Construction Contingency
$900,000
$2.06
$28,055,594
$64
4
5A
Structural Steel
7A
1 $
Interior finishes
Elevators
21
22
8 through 12
14A
Q
R
w/above
CONSTRUCTION COST
(P+Q)
$4,800,000
$11
$32,855,594
$75
$900,000
$2,492,250
$12,146,857
$11,850,657
$0
$0
$0
$0
$28,055,594
$2,492,250
$12,146,857
$11,850,657
$0
$0
$0
$0
$32,855,594
$4,800,000
$8.90
$111.85
COMPONENT COST PER SQ-FT TOALS
$8.90
U
$32,855,594
$33,000,000
105
$111.85
$250.01
$250.01
$75.36
DESCRIPTION
QTY.
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
$4,516,300
3,780
5,040
308
444
lf
lf
cy
cy
450.00
450.00
650.00
650.00
1,701,000
2,268,000
200,200
288,600
39,000 sf
1.50
58,500
SUBSTRUCTURE
Precast Dbl Tees - Pier
Precast Dbl Tees - Pier Head
6" Precast Deck - Pier
6" PIP Conc Deck - Pier Head
49,000
62,000
953
1,206
sf
sf
cy
cy
35.00
35.00
450.00
450.00
1,715,000
2,170,000
428,750
542,500
BUILDING STRUCTURE
Structure Rehab - Pyramid
Structure New - Pyramid
Monumental Stairs - Pyramid
Stairs/Handrails - Pyramid
39,000
23,500
4
400
sf
sf
flts
risers
35.00
100.00
50,000.00
650.00
1,365,000
2,350,000
200,000
260,000
EXTERIOR CLOSURE
Alum/Glass - Pyramid
GFRC - Pyramid
19,200 sf
16,500 sf
110.00
110.00
2,112,000
1,815,000
$4,856,250
$4,175,000
$3,927,000
106
PROSPECT PIER
DESCRIPTION
QTY.
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
8,500 sf
30,000 sf
2,400 sf
3.50
12.50
40.00
29,750
375,000
96,000
45,733 sf
17,200 sf
25,900 sf
10.00
30.00
15.00
457,330
516,000
388,500
1.00
10,000.00
150.00
125.00
125.00
25.00
125.00
44,761
10,000
330,000
275,000
87,500
1,900,000
143,750
25,000.00
375,000
3.00
40.00
40,000.00
4.00
50,000.00
40.00
18.00
8.00
165,000
49,200
40,000
179,044
50,000
49,200
309,600
207,200
SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
Specialties
Equipment
Traffic Barrier/Conc Seating - Pier
Railings - Pier
Railings - Pyramid
Traffic Decks - Pier
Railings - Pier, floors 5&6
F.F. & E. - N.I.C.
Seagrass mitigation - None
CONVEYING SYSTEMS
Traction Elevator 3500lb
MECHANICAL
Fire Sprinkler Sys
FS Piping to Landside
Fire Pump Tower
Plumbing System
Plb Lift Station & Grease Trap
Plb Piping to Landside
HVAC System - A/C space
HVAC System - Shell space
$500,750
$1,361,830
$2,791,011
44,761
1
2,200
2,200
700
76,000
1,150
sf
ls
lf
lf
lf
sf
lf
$375,000
15 stop
$1,049,244
55,000
1,230
1
44,761
1
1,230
17,200
25,900
sf
lf
ls
sf
ls
lf
sf
sf
107
DESCRIPTION
QTY.
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
$960,950
17,200
25,900
1,230
1
1
1
81,000
1
sf
sf
lf
sf
ls
ls
sf
ls
20.00
8.00
75.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
50,000.00
2.50
50,000.00
344,000
207,200
92,250
5,000
10,000
50,000
202,500
50,000
150,000
27,778
3,490
4,444
5,556
1,911
2,500
20,000
23,700
2
1
30
200,000
200,000
200,000
303
sf
cy
lf
sy
sy
sy
lf
sf
sf
ea
ls
ea
sf
sf
sf
cy
1.00
20.00
200.00
5.00
40.00
40.00
15.00
6.00
7.50
15,000.00
20,000.00
1,500.00
1.50
0.25
0.65
25.00
150,000
555,556
698,000
22,222
222,222
76,444
37,500
120,000
177,750
30,000
20,000
45,000
300,000
50,000
130,000
7,564
2,642,259
Subtotal:
27,155,594
27,155,594
4,800,000
900,000
$32,855,594
$32,855,594
108
PROSPECT PIER
109
110
PROSPECT PIER
COMPETITION TEAM
FR-EE/ FERNANDO
ROMERO ENTERPRISE
MESH
ARUP
Fernando Romero
Sergio Rebelo
Yuri Jeong
Celia Julve
Francisco Rocha
Alex Zee
Qingyi Chen
Joao Urbano
Feifei Song
Wen Zhu
Jessica Wang
Unai Artetxe
Sunny Wang
Daniela Gallo
Fatimah Azzahra
Christopher Shelley
Tim Clemmons
Gary Grooms
Jenny Miers
Daniel Brodkin
Sanya Levi
Vincent Lee
Sanjeev Malhotra
Cameron Thomson
Nubia Herrera
CIVITAS
Mark Johnson
Chris Parezo
Ilana Fowler
PENTAGRAM
TILLOTSON
FALLER DAVIS
Natasha Jen
Larissa Marquez
Suzan Tillotson
Nicole Cribbs
Bruce Hashbrouck
VICKSTROM
CC&A
Daniel Vickstrom
Robert A. Kaupp
111