Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Cambridge University Press and Economic History Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The Journal of Economic History.
http://www.jstor.org
The Conquering
BalkanOrthodoxMerchant*
HE origins
ofa BalkanOrthodox
merchant
classorclassesmaybe
traced
backtothefourteenth
andfifteenth
centuries.
Notuntilthe
diditbecomesufficiently
eighteenth
century,
however,
strong
inwealth
and numberto capturethetradeof Hungary,
SouthRussia,and the
eastern
Mediterranean.
The eighteenth
century
wasa timeofexpansion
and Russiantradein theBalkans.It was
ofFrench,
German,
English,
ofthetradeofMoslemAlbanianandBosnianmeralsoa timeofgrowth
to thecultural,
chants.But,in termsof itssignificance
political,
and
general
historical
evolution
oftheBalkanpeoples,
mostimportant
ofall
theGreektrader
oftheBalkanOrthodox
wastheexpansion
merchant:
the Greekand Orthodox
of Constantinople,
Salonika,and Smyrna,
Albanianmerchant,
sailor,and shipper
ofthesmallerAegeanislands,
muleteer
theGreek,Vlach,and Macedo-Slav
and forwarding
agent
of Epirus,Thessaly,and Macedonia,the Serbianpig-merchant
of
the"Illyrian"
andforwarding
Sumadija,
muleteer
agentofHerzegovina
in Ragusa(Dubrovnik)orTrieste,
andDalmatia,whosetup business
the"Rascian"ofPannonia,
and theGreekor Bulgarian
oftheeastern
wereOttoman,
Rhodope.The BalkanOrthodox
merchants
Habsburg,
but
their
business
and Russiansubjects,
principal
was to bringgoods
intoor outof theOttomanEmpire.The areaof theirprimary
businorthand westof thepoliticallimitsof
nessconcentration
stretched
theOttoman
EmpiretoNezhinin SouthRussia,Leipzigin Germany,
Viennain Austria,and Livornoand Naples in Italy.In western
an areaof secondary
in creating
commercial
Europe,theysucceeded
penetration.
The decadenceof Ottomanpoliticaland social institutions,
the
The researchand publicationof this studywere made possibleby generousgrantsfrom
the RutgersResearchCouncil,the Calm Foundationof RutgersUniversity,
the FrenchCentre
de RecherchesHistoriques,and by a Fulbrightgrant for researchin Salonika, Greece, on
problemsof Serbianand Macedoniansocial and economichistory.Exploratory
paperson some
aspectsof the presentstudy were read at the annual meetingof the AmericanHistorical
Associationin December I956 and at a meetingof the Societyof MacedonianStudies of
Salonika in Decemberi958. I am indebtedto ProfessorDavid S. Landes for valuable comof thisworkand to Professor
FernandBraudelforintroducmentson a preliminary
manuscript
ing me to the historicalscience of the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes and to his own
revolutionary
conceptionsof history,withoutwhich the presentstudy would be almost inconceivabhe.
234
The beginnings
ofthenon-Greek
andtherevivaland strengthening
merchant
classes
Balkan
of the Greek
go back to the fourteenth
ofOttoman
The consolidation
andarenotinitially
century
inspiration.
therecruitment
of fresheleof Ottomanpower,however,
permitted
class.Fromthestart
mentsintothestillverysmallnativecommercial
tothecloseofthesixteenth
and culmination
ofthefourteenth
century
classesoftheBalkansexpanded
themerchant
ofOttoman
ascendance,
theencouragement
stimuli:
oftradewith
inresponse
tothreeprincipal
theexclusion
theWestandextension
ofcommercial
ofnonfreedoms,
ofnewandrevival
Ottoman
shipsfromtheBlackSea,andthebuilding
Balkantowns.
ofdeclining
236
Trajan Stoianovich
Severalearlyfourteenth
centurySerbianchrysobulls,
ordinances,
and theLaw Code of StefanDusan authorized
commercial
treaties,
Greek,"Latin"or Italian,Ragusan,Bulgarian,
Serbian,Vlach,and
Albanianmerchants
to markettheirgoodswithout
hindrance
in the
fairsofSerbiaor carrythemfreely
in transit,
provided
theyotherwise
conformed
tothelawandabstained
frombringing
armstoSerbia's
foes
and neighbors.'
Eager to developits own commerce
and mining
economy,
Bosniagranted
similar,
although
lessextensive,
commercial
to themerchants
privileges
of Spalato(Split),Zara (Zadar),Ragusa,
Sebenico(Sibenik),and Traui(Trogir).'
Dusan'sLaw Code and Serbiantreaties
for
withRagusaprovided
theimposition
ofheavymonetary
on anyindividual,
penalties
regardor
lessof rankor office,
who attempted
to restrain
eithermerchant
peasantfrombuyingor sellinggoods,includinggrains,and freely
hiswarestomarket.
Oneoftheaimsofthisarticle
oftheLaw
bringing
landlords
and officials
fromforcing
Code was to prevent
peasantsto
selltheirproduct
belowthemarket
price.The Law Codealsofixedthe
natureandamountofcorveeservices
in order
andmadethemuniform
to facilitate
theexecution
the
of theformer
provision.
Significantly,
himself
was expressly
Emperor
subjectto thelaw.3
and Ragusa,
SlavsfromCattaro(Kotor),Zara,Zagreb,Medrus'a,
beganto settlein Anconaas merchants
duringthesecondhalfofthe
fourteenth
century.
Fear of Turkishoverlordship
soon drovemany
moreSlavsto Ancona,wheretheywerein sufficient
numberaround
themiddleof thefollowing
century
to formtheirown commune
or
1 Teodor Taranovski,Istorijasrpskogprava u Nemanjhckoj
drzavi [Historyof Serbianlaw
I, 111-12,
in the stateof the Nemanja dynasty](Belgrade:Geca Kon, 193I-35),
II5;
Stojan
Novakovic,ed., Zakonskispomenicisrpskihdriava srednjegaveka [Legal monumentsof the
pp. I67-70;
Serbian statesof the Middle Ages] (Belgrade: Serbian Royal Academy,I9I2),
p.
Nikola RadojZic,DusianovZakonik [Dusan's law code] (Novi Sad: Matica Srpska,I950),
62.
(Warsaw,I874), I, No.
238
Trajan Stoianovich
earlypartof thesixteenth
thesouthern
century.8
By bringing
trade
routesunderOttomancontrol,
SuleimantheMagnificent
continued
theattempt
ofhispredecessors
to center
thespicetradeoftheworldat
Constantinople.
The conquest
ofBagdadandtheunsuccessful
Ottoman
navalactionsagainstthePortugese
of Diu' reflect
thesameeconomic
policy.9
Moslemsand Christian
Greeksand Slavs-oftenin Moslemdress,
whichafforded
themtheprestige
of thenew"Byzan.
and protection
tium"-brought
theircommerce
to Austriaand evento Lyons,center
of Frenchfinance.'0
Amongthechiefbeneficiaries
of thePax Ottomanicawere,ofcourse,
theshipsandmerchants
ofSlavicand Catholic
Ragusa.But OrthodoxSerbsand Greeksalso profited.
In fact,the
OttomanGovernment
intervened
severaltimesduringthe sixteenth
century
to protect
Serbian,
or Rascian,merchants
in Austria."Greek
carriedtheirtradeevento Antwerp.
merchants
In I582, in anycase,
theDuke ofBrabant
four"mercatores
authorized
Graeciex provinciae
[Galatiae]"to bringOttomanwaresto Antwerp,
"tamperPoloniam
aut Moscoviam
fretiHercules,"disposeof
quam maria
per angustias
themwithout
obstacle,
and providethemselves
withgoodsforexport
to Turkey.'2
The tradeofBalkanmerchants
withtheWest,although
preciseand accurate
dataarelacking,appearsto havereachedat this
momenta heightthatwas notsurpassed
untila century
and a half
later.
in thewestern
One groupofBalkanmerchants,
Ottoman
especially
to
to theeffort maketheOttoman
provinces,
thusarosein response
commerce.Anothergroup,
Empirethe centerof Mediterranean
especially
in thecentral
wasbornofthe
andeastern
Balkanprovinces,
needto assuretheprovisioning
of theOttomancapital.The Empire
openedits doorsto Europeanimports.
At the same time,it gave
themwiththeduty,of
domestic
merchants
theright,and burdened
81 diarii di Marino Sanuto, XXXVI (Venice, I893), 406-7; VitorinoMagalhies-Godinho,
in Evantailde l'histoirevivante:
et egyptienet la routedu Cap, I496-I553,"
"Le repliv~enitien
linguistes,
geographes,economistes,
Hommage a Lucien Febvreofferspar l'amitied'historiens,
sociologues,ethnologues(Paris: ArmandColin, 1953), II, 291-92.
9 A. H. Libyer,"The OttomanTurks and the Routesof OrientalTrade," EnglishHistorical
XXX (I9I5),
Review,
586.
intoa worldemporium
If theattempt
to transform
Constantinople
forsugar,spices,and silksmetwithonlypartialsuccess,
thepolicyof
Thisonceteeming
repeopling
itwasspectacularly
successful.
metropolis
encompassed
at no timein thehalfcentury
before
itsfullto theTurks
morethanioo,ooo inhabitants.
to thenewcapital
Intensively
applying
theOttoman
at leastsomeofthemanydepleted
policyofrepopulating
townsand citiesoftheirnewrealms,
MehmedtheConqueror
andhis
successors
welcomed,
urged,coaxed,and bodilytransplanted
Turks,
deVillalon,
andJews
oftheBosporus.
Cristobal
totheshores
Christians,
prisoner
oftheTurkswhobecamethefamily
physician
ofSinanPasha
Conin thetimeofhislatercaptivity,
after1552 relates
that,probably
stantinople
(Istanbul)contained
40,000Christian,
io,oooJewish,
and
morethan6o,oooMoslemcasas; thesuburbs
ofGalata,Pera,andEyub
"casas."Aftera century
of Ottomanrule
comprised
io,oooadditional
thecapitaleasilycounted
several
hundred
thousand
souls.'3
The establishment
ofempireandresurgence
ofConstantinople
as an
Ottomanofficials
imperial
metropolis
confronted
withtheproblem
of
a dependable
securing
market
forthepressing
needsof thestateand
peopleand of findingreliabletradersand contractors.
The Empire
couldnotriskallowingtheprovisioning
of thecapitaland supplying
inthehandsofforeign
ofthearmyandnavytoremain
merchants
with
13Alfons Maria Schneider, "Die Bev6lkerungKonstantinopelsim XV. Jahrhundert,"
Ki., No. 9
in Gdttingen,philologisch-hist.
Nachrichtender Akademie der Wissenschaften
y memories,
Cristobalde Villalon, "Viaje de Turquia," Autobiografias
(1949), pp. 233-42;
ed. Manuel Serranoy Sanz (vol. II of Nueva Bibliotecade autoresespafioles)(Madrid: Casa
),
p. I46. In i590 the cizye,or poll tax, leviedon the
[I902]
EditorialBailly-Baillere,
Pera, and Scutariamountedto 38,ooo sequins. The
Christianpopulationof Constantinople,
averagelevy upon male Christiansfourteenyearsof age or over being one sequin, one may
assumethepresenceof somewhatmorethan40,000 Christianfamiliesin thecapitaland suburbs.
It would thusappearthatthe Christianpopulationdid not growmuchbetween1560 and i590.
On the poll tax levy of 1590, see JohannWilhelm Zinkeisen,Geschichtedes osmanischen
Reichesin Europa, III. Das innereLeben und angehenderVerfalldes Reichesbis zum Jahre
1623 (Gotha, i855), p. 36i. Accordingto Hans Dernschwam,commercialagentof the House
at the
of Fugger,the Ottomantax registersaccountedfor the presencein Constantinople,
or cizye.
of whom6,785 paid theharaczsch
therein I553, of I5,035 Jews,
timeofhissojourn
On the basis of the estimateof Stephan Gerlach,the Jewishpopulationof Constantinople
numbered
30,000
in
I574,
und Kleinasien
Babinger,ed., Hans Dernschwam'sTagebucheinerReise nach Konstantinopel
& Humblot,
pp. 107 and I07, n.
I923),
(MunichandLeipzig:VerlagvonDuncker
(1553-55)
2:5 in
318. If the ratiobetweenthe poll tax levy and totalJewishpopulationis approximately
and we extendthisratioto the Christianpopulation,the totalnon-Moslemelementof the
1553
For manyreasons,
citycould not have numberedmore than I50,000 in the period I570-I590.
to estimatethe totalMoslempopulation,but it is unlikelyto have been much
it is moredifficult
householdof the Sultan.We may, in any case, set
in excessof 250,000, even withthe official
ca. I570 at a minimumfigureof 400,000.
thepopulationof Constantinople
240
Traian Stoianovich
whosegovernments
it mightone dayfinditselfat war.Slowly,and
undercircumstances
thusfar onlyvaguelyelucidated,
the rightto
navigatein the watersof the Black Sea, increasingly
considered
a
preserve
forthewantsof the stateand capital,was deniedto ever
largergroupsof foreign
shipsand merchants.
TheVeneto-Ottoman
of1454,1479,1482,and1513 specifically
treaties
allowedtheVenetians
to navigatein theBlackSea,butsucha provisionwas lackingin thetreaty
of I540.'4 Ragusanshipsareknownto
havesailedtoVarna,wheretheytookon suppliesofwooland leather
(montonini,
vacchini,
and bufalini)at leastuntilI59o.'5 In 1592,
"mercanti
Candiotti
de' viniinPolonia"appealedtoVenicetoopenthe
Friulianland routeto theircommerce,
forthe "moltetiranniede
Turchi"nowprevented
theirsevenoreightgalleonsfromtransporting
theircargoesof wineto Polandbywayof theBlackSea."6Between
I592 and 1783thecommerce
of theBlackSea appearsto havebeen
completely
offlimitsfortheshipsofwestern
Europe.The BlackSea
becamea mareclausum.'7
The victory
of theOttomanEmpiresymbolized,
in thesphereof
a victory
economics,
ofGreeks,
Turks,renegade
Christians,
Armenians,
Ragusans,and Jewsoverthetwo-century-old
commercial
hegemony
of Veniceand Genoa.Greek,Armenian,
Ragusan,and Jewishmerchantsrapidly
becamethechieftaxfarmers,
andbusinessmen
bankers,
ofthenewEmpire.Members
ofGreeknoblefamilies-the
Batazidai,
Chrysoloroi,
Azanaioi,and Chalkokondyles
amongthem-captured
partofthetradeoftheEuxineandeventhefurtradeofRussia."8
The
taxfarmer,
wealthiest
and leaseholder
of imperial
merchant,
revenues
-until his hangingin 1576-wasthe popularly
hated"Son of the
Devil" MichaelCantacuzenus,
who used to build fifteen
or more
fortheOttoman
galleys
fleet
every
yearandcould,inpractice,
nominate
GreekOrthodox
andtheprinces
bishops
ofMoldaviaandWallachia."9
14 George Young, Corps de droit ottoman(Oxford: ClarendonPress, Igo5-6), III, 66n.;
Libyer,"The OttomanTurks,"EnglishHistoricalReview,XXX (I9I5), 582.
15FernandBraudel,La Mditerraneeet le monde mediterraneen
a l'epopue de Philippe11
(Paris: ArmandColin, I949), pp. 8i, 246.
16Eugenio Alberi, ed., Relazioni degli ambasciatorivenetial Senato, serie IIIa, vol. II
(Florence,I844), 412.
17 Young,Corpsde droitottoman,
III, 65-68.
18 N. Iorga, "Les grandesfamiliesbyzantineset l'id6e byzantineen Roumanie,"Bulletin
de la Sectionhisborique
de l'AcademieRoumaine[hereafter
citedas Bulletin,Acad. Roumaine],
XVIII (I93I),
Daniell, ed., The Life and
3-5; CharlesThorntonForsterand F. H. Blackburne
Lettersof Ogier Ghiselinde Busbecq (London, i88.i), I, I8.
19Iorga,"Les grades families,"
Gottwald,"Phanariotische
Studien,"Leipziger Vierteliahrsschrift
fur Suidosteuropa[hereafter
citedas LVjsfSOE], V. (I94I),
43; Samuel Gerlach,ed., StephanGerlachdess AelternTageBuch. . . (Frankfurt
amMain,I674), p. 6o.
p. i28.
242
Traian Stoianovich
receivethedreadedvisitof rapaciousgovernment
buyersand monopolists.'
The thirdstimulus
to theriseof a Balkanmerchant
classwas the
urbanization
policyof the Ottomanstate.Appliedenergetically
to
Constantinople,
thispolicywas extended
simultaneously
totheBalkan
interior.
New townswerefounded:Babadaghin Dobrudja,Osman
Pazar in thedistrict
of Sumen,Orhanijein theStaraPlanina,Tatar
Pazardzik,Novi Pazar,Tirana,Elbasan,Sarajevo,Travnik,Kbprulli
ofOttoman
(Veles),andPirot.The first
twocenturies
unoccupation,
favorable
tothedevelopment
ofNovoBrdo,Ochrida(Ohrid),Trnovo,
and Anchialus,inspiredtheexpansionofPhilipSrebrenica,
Mesembria,
popolis (Plovdiv), Adrianople,Janina,Salonika,Larissa (Yenizehir),
Tripolitsa(Tripolis), Pljevlje,Prokupije,Uskiib (Skoplje), Monastir
(Bitolj), Sofia, Belgrade, Valjevo, Uzice, Kladovo (Fethislam),
Hercegnovi(Castelnuovo),Mostar,Foca, Banja Luka, Zvornik,Jajce,
and Livno.23
The formationof empirerequiredthe ameliorationof the arteries
I,
32-33;
v Sofija,yearXIII,vol.LXII (1901),
druzestvo
I73-76,
I85-87,
I92;
PeterCharanis,
"A Note
244
Traian Stoianovich
i825.28
Veryfew Jewsinhabited
MoldaviaandWallachiabefore
themiddleoftheseventeenth
century,
counted
butin i825 MoldaviaandWallachia
8o,oooJews.'Sephardic,
26 Salo Wittmayer
Baron,A Social and ReligiousHistoryof the Jews(New York: Columbia
Press,I937), II, I72.
University
Hungary(London: ErnestBenn Ltd., 1934), p. 2Io.
27C. A. Macartney,
28 Martinvon Schwartner,
Statistikdes KdnigreichsUngern (2d aug. and rev. ed.; Ofen,
I809-II),
I,
I44.
(Oxford:
Clarendon
Press,I929), II, 723-24.
33Isaac Broyde,"Constantinople,"
JewishEncyclopedia,IV, 238.
34 PrinceNikolaosSoutsos,Memoiresdu PrinceNicolasSoutzo,Grand-Logothete
de Moldavie,
ed. PanaiotiRizos (Vienne: Gerold& Cie, I899), p. io.
I798-I87I,
246
Trajan Stoianovich
century.
Sofia,
and middleof the seventeenth
closeof thefifteenth
35 Wilhelmy,
pp. 28-29;
Bernardo,Viaggioa Constantinopoli,
II, 89, 99-I00;
Hochbulgarien,
K. N. Kostic,"Gradja za istorijusrpsketrgovine,"Spomenik,LXVI, 2d cl., Book 52 (I926),
pp. I84-90; Babinger,Hans Dernschwam'sTagebuch, p. 107, n. 3I8; Barkan, "Quelques
295-96;
pp. 292,
observations,"Recuedisde la Societe lean Bodin, VII, No. 2 (I955),
p. 84;
Barkan, "Vers un renouveaude l'histoireottomane,"Contrrencesd'Athenes (1952),
zur Tuirkenzeit,"
Arno Mehlan, "Mittel- und Westeuropa und die Balkanjahresmarkte
III (Leipzig, 1938), 82. The anonymousauthorof a description
Forschungen,
Sfidostdeutsche
against the Turks describesSkopije as a "vast
of the Austriancampaign of I689-I690
markettownnot much smallerthan Prague,or perhapsjust as large,"with a totalpopulation
of perhaps6o,ooo, of which3,000 were Jews.Cf. Kriegsarchiv(Vienna), Feldakten,Tuirkensee note I3.
fols.33-34. On theJewsof Constantinople,
kriegI689, fasc.I67 (I3/I),
Jews paid the poll tax
36 In 1553, accordingto Dernschwam,6,785 Constantinopolitan
only 5,I50 Jews paid the cizye. Cf. Babinger,Hans Dernschwam's
or cizye. In I69I/92
Tagebuch, p. 107; Uriel Heyd, "The JewishCommunitiesof Istanbul in the Seventeenth
p. 309.
Century,"Oriens,VI, No. 2 (Dec. 3I, I953),
37 Emmanuel,Histoire des Israelitesde Salonique, pp. I4, 26I; Young, Corps de droit
ottoman,II, 142-43; AbrahamGalante,Histoiredes Juilsd'Anatolie(Istanbul:Babok,I937-39),
a l'histoiredes Juifsespagnolsa Vienne," Revue
I, 136, I6i; N. M. Gelber,"Contribution
des Etudes juices, XCVII 0934), II4, I21; M. Franco,Essai sur l'histoiredes Israelitesde
l'Empire ottomandepuis les originesjusqu'ai nos jours (Paris: LibrairieDurlacher,I897),
p. iI9; Cecil Roth,Venice ["JewishCommunitiesSeries"] (Philadelphia:The JewishPublication Societyof America,1930), pp. 306-9, 331, 333. On Jewsin Ragusa in the sixteenthand
workof JorjoTadic, Jevreiiu Dubrovnikudo polovine
see the important
centuries,
seventeenth
century](Sarajevo: "La
XVII stoljeia [Jewsin Dobrovnikuntilthe middleof the seventeenth
Benevolencia,"1937).
248
Traian Stoianovich
Butthemost
intothesea,orfrozenwaters.
seasonofthewinter
coldest
backsandsides
topricktheir
wasfirst
ofmortification
manner
common
ninelashes."In i666,
and thento givethemselves
thirty
withthorns,
Islam,andpartofthe
unexpectedly
embraced
Shabbethai
underduress,
ofthe
The coming
hisexample.
ofSalonikafollowed
community
Jewish
wasthuspostponed.4'
"FifthMonarchy"
Jewswho remainedin theOttomanEmpireafteri666,although
apostasy,were psychologically
somewhatsoberedby Shabbethai's
andtendedto
fromtheclimateofmoderncapitalism
further
removed
less
able
thanthose
less
and
generally
less
enterprising,
be
wealthy,
itseems,had "truly
fallen."
Jews,
whodeparted.
By i750 theOttoman
forgiftsand bribesto theTurks
enormous
expenses
Mutualrivalries,
and a predilection
of ancientprivileges,
forconfortheconservation
or tnecertaine
outreed'Espagnol,"
magnificence
consumption,
spicuous
of the numerically
prehad causedthe dwindlingof the fortunes
Only the so-called
OttomanJewsof Hispanicorigin.42
ponderant
and "Livornese"(or "Italian")Jews,morerecentar"Portuguese"
toperpetuate
ofFrance,continued
rivalswhowereundertheprotection
wealthand enterprise.43
ofJewish
theearliertraditions
III
BalkantownsbecamelessJewish,
Slowlyandalmostimperceptibly,
evenless Turkish,and moreGreek,
less Armenianand sometimes
from
moreSlavic,andmoreAlbanian.In Old Serbiaand Macedonia,
offamilies
fledto Hungaryin i69o, thetrend
whichmanythousands
was complicated
bythefactthattownsoftenbecamemoreGreekor
untilthattimemainlyby Slavs.This
Albanianin regionsinhabited
in spiteof seemingcontradictions,
was the
urbanrenationalization,
41 Sir Paul Rycaut (late consul of Smyrna& fellow of the Royall Societie), The History
of the TurkishEmpire,fromthe Year 1623, to the Year z677, Containingthe Reignsof the
Three Last Emperors. . . (London, i687), pp. I74-8i. On the movementof Shabbethai
Zebi, see also H. Graetz, Historyof the Jews (Philadelphia:JewishPublicationSocietyof
America,c. i895), V, ii8-66; Abram Leon Schahar,A Historyof the Jews (New York:
AlfredA. Knopf,I937), pp. 242-44; SolomonGrayzel,A Historyof the Jews(Philadelphia:
ofAmerica,
1947), pp. 512-15.
Publication
Society
Jewish
42A. N., Aff.Etr. B"'. 239, memoiron the commerceof the Black Sea, Doc. No. I,
The anonymousauthorof the memoiractuallyobservesthat the Jews
I75I.
Constantinople,
have "trulyfallen. . . in companywith the Armenians."See also the
of Constantinople
memoiron "the characterof the people of the country,theircommerce,"ibid., Doc. No. i8,
1751-53.
43 A. N., Aff.Etr. B"'. 234, memoiron the Portugueseand Italian Jews,I693; A. N., Aff.
Etr. B"' 237, memoiron the commerceof Salonika,AugustI736.
250
Traian Stojanovich
The sexualattitudes
and practices
of the Turksalso accountfor
in Balkantowns.Pouqueville,
thedeclineof theTurkishpopulation
ofGreekand
thewell-known
Frenchtraveler,
consul,and chronicler
Balkanhistory,
writesoftheMoreotewomenofMoslemfaithand of
Moslemsexualhabitsin general:
Quoique souvent elles [Moreote Moslem women] soient grecques elles-memes,
rarementont-elles,comme ces dernieres,un grand nombred'enfants;ce qu'il faut
des avortemens
attribuer,
d'une part,a la polygamie,et de l'autre,a l'arteffroyable
qui leur est familier:nulle part ses effetsne furentaussi funestes,ni si solennellement consacres.Avoues publiquementdans la familledu sultan,qui condamne
a la steriliteses soeurs et ses nieces,ces moyensaffreuxde depopulationpassent
dans les diff6rentes
classes de la society.Si un Turc soupconne la fidelityde ses
femmes,elles ne balancentpas a commettrele crime; elles s'y livrentmeme, et
sans remords,dans la seule vue de conserverleurs attraits,et de manager cette
beauty qui leur donne 1'empiresur des rivales avec lesquelles elles ne cessent
d'etreen guerre.
In i655, i percentofitspopulation
wasChristian.
In i807, onefourth
of its inhabitants
were Christian,virtuallyall OrthodoxSerbs.
Christians
of Banja Luka in
comprised
6 percentof thepopulation
i655 and8opercentin i807, halfRomanCatholics
andhalfOrthodox
Serbs.The totalpopulation
ofbothtownswas considerably
smallerat
the closeof the eighteenth
century
thanit had been in i655. The
Moslemelementdeclinedbothabsolutely
and relatively,
whilethe
Christianelementincreased.49
In 1578,Philippopolis
contained250
in i68o,io,oooof thetown'sinhabitants
Christians;
wereOrthodox
Greeksand Bulgarians.50
Between1734 and 1792 thetotalpopulation
of Salonika,whichhad declinedduringthe previoushalf-century,
grewby 50 percent.The Greekelementin thetownmayhaveincreasedfrom20 to 25 per cent of the total population,the Jewish
49
252
Traian Stojanovich
254
Traian Stojanovich
The
enterprises.
Moslems,thatis, withoutthe old violence-using
and Serbiaalmostachieved
townswerelaterreurbanized,
deurbanized
townand uninational
idealof theuninational
thenineteenth-century
state.
different
althoughsubstantially
The GreekWar of Independence,
gave the
in originfromthe Serbianwars of nationalliberation,
to
Greeksin revoltand thenew Greekstatea similaropportunity
theexpulsion
through
realizeruraland urbannationalhomogeneity
(the
of theTurkishand MoslemAlbanianminority
or annihilation
agencies)and the Hellenizationof Orthodox
old violence-using
Kosovo,Metohija,
Albaniansand Vlachs.In Bosnia,Herzegovina,
came
Epirus,Thessaly,and Bulgaria,nationalliberation
Macedonia,
were absentin the
tendencies
later,not becauserenationalization
of the
but becauseof the extremecomplexity
century,
eighteenth
oftheseterritories,
whichdelayedthe
composition
ethnicandreligious
authority.
ofa strong,
single,popularprotection-producing
emergence
IV
policiesoftheOttomanEmpire
The protectionist
and urbanization
of
thedevelopment
stimulated
in theera of itspoliticalascendance
in thechiefcities,
in Balkantownsandtheemergence,
industries
craft
the woolenmanufacture
including
textileindustry,
of an important
or
DerivedfromByzantium
of Salonika.60
of theJewish
community
fromSpainthrough
theagencyof theIberianJews,Ottomanmanuafter
intactforalmosta century
traditions
weremaintained
facturing
No new technicaladvances
thereignof Suleimanthe Magnificent.
and theprotection
of
weremadein theseventeenth
however,
century,
once
The
Turkish,
laterceased.
Greek,
flourishing
Ottomanindustry
and
of Salonika,Brusa,Adrianople,
and Jewish
textilemanufactures
declinedor disappeared.'
Constantinople
and protectionist
of mercantilist
policieswas
The abandonment
Ottoman
the
of
the
decline
of
and consequence
itselfa reflection
in
whichstemmed
enterprise,
as a protection-producing
government
in thegenoftheOttoman
Empiretoparticipate
partfromthefailure
century.
eral Europeandemographic
expansionof the eighteenth
60 I. (saac) S. (amuel) Emmanuel,Historiede l'industrie
des tissusdes Israelitesde Salonique
p. 254; Svoronos,
Wirtschftsgeschichte,
(Paris: Lipschutz,I935), p. 23; SakAzov, Bulgarische
de Salonique,p. i87.
Le commerce
61Ibid., p. 397; Emmanuel,Histoirede l'industie des tissue,pp. 53-63.
Merchant255
BalkanOrthodox
Conquering
Several European states,namelyRussia and Hungary,opened their
to settlement
by otherEuropeans.Ottomanpolicy,on the
frontiers
Ottomansubjectsto fleeand discouraged
encouraged
many
otherhand,
in thedominionsof theSultan.The population
fromsettling
foreigners
of European Turkey,threeor fourtimesthat of Hungaryin I700,
failedto keep pace withthatof its neighbor,whichincreased-as we
shall see in detaillater-by400 per centbetweenI700 and i8oo. Thus,
in i8oo, the population of Hungary probably exceeded that of
EuropeanTurkey.
The decline or stagnationof population,unless compensatedby
or territorial
proexpansionor innovation,
commercial,
technological,
vokes a declineor stagnationof total and, under certainconditions,
even per capita purchasingpower.Ottomandemographicstagnation
was accompanied,as we have seen,by an urbandemographiccontracresultedin the narrowtion.Rural stagnationand urbancontraction
ing of the domesticmarket.Confrontedwith an inadequateurban
domesticmarketfor their farm surpluses,the landowningclasses
soughtto place theirgoods in foreignmarkets.
The expansionof towns,population,and industryin westernand
centurycreateda risingdemand
centralEuropeduringtheeighteenth
fortheruralproductionof the Balkans:grains,hides,cattle,meat,oil,
wax, silk,wool, cotton,tobacco,and timber.The increaseddemand
produceda rapid rise in the price of rural commodities.The landhowowningclasseswerethusable torealizetheiraims.Theirsuccesses,
and urbanor semiurban
ever,arousedthejealousyof Ottomanofficials
who hired and armed each his own band of destitute
proprietors,
In
men in orderto forcethe Balkan peasantryto accept"protection."
many areas,especiallynear the coastsor in the lowlands and river
valleys,the peasantsoon foundhimselfwith two landlords,one to
whom he paid a legal rentand anotherto whom he gave "protection
money"in the formof a portionof his produce.62
62 For a more completediscussionof demographicand economicchange in the Balkans
and the profoundrelationshipbetweenthe two, see sectionVI of the presentstudy and
Stoianovich,"L'economie balkanique," passim; Stoianovich,"Land Tenure," Journal of
EconomicHistory,XIII (I953), 398-4II;
Svoronos,Le commercede Salonique, pp. 8.i-82,
of artisansand the extraeconomic
measurestheypursued
362-66. On the economicdifficulties
to amelioratetheircondition,see Sabri F. tlgener, "La morale des metiersdepuis le XIVe
siecleet les critiquesqui leur ont ft6adress'es,"Revue de la FaculM des SciencesEconomiques
de l'Universited'lstanbul,XI, Nos. I-4 (Oct. I949-July I950), pp. 62-66. Felix-Beaujour,
Tableau du4commerce,I, o30-32, draws a dark pictureof general povertyand distressin
spite,or ratherbecause,of the exportationof a verylarge part of the rural productionof
Macedonia:
256
Traian Stoianovich
interest
The urbanproperty-owning
classesthusacquireda primary
ofwealththrough
theexpropriation
intheaccumulation
ofthepeasant
and exportation
of expropriated
ruralcommodities.
They ceasedto
have a profound
or primary
interest
in the protection
of industry,
whilethelandowning
classeswerefundamentally
opposedto theprotection
ofcommodities
whichweremoreexpensive
thantheirEuropean
counterparts
and of poorerquality.Europeanstatesand merchants,
of Ottoman
furthermore,
obstructed
the revivaland improvement
manufactures.
In a fewscattered
placesoftheBalkansandAegean,namelyamong
the Greeks,industry
grew,it is true,even duringthe eighteenth
century.
The townandportofChios,forexample,
continued
topossess
a prosperous
textileindustry,
thanksto theebullience
and entrepreneurialambition
or "desird'entreprendre"
of its increasingly
Greek
Orthodoxinhabitants.
The commercial
and industrial
prosperity
of
Chiosalso stemmed
fromitsenjoyment,
sincethetimeof Suleiman,
of judicialand administrative
autonomy.63
Naxos,however,
which
evenmoreextensive
enjoyed
autonomies,
thrived
on commerce
neither
nor industry.
For the numerous
impoverished
"nobility"
of Naxos,
theirancestry
to thepre-Ottoman
Italianaristocracy
or to the
tracing
Paleologues
andComnenes,
haughtily
disdained
manuallabor.64
Local
autonomies
promoted
thegrowth
ofcommerce
and industry,
butonly
"Quand on consider la Macedoinesous le pointde vue de ses avantagesnaturels,on trouve
qu'il n'est aucun pays de l'Europe ou les individusaient requ plus d'aptitudeau bonheur:
mais quand on l'envisagesous l'aspectde ses formespolitiques,on trouveque tous les fleaux
d'une administration
barbaresemblents'etredonned'
la main pour desolerune des plus belles
contreesde la terrepar la richesseet la varietyde ses produits.
"La moitiede la Mac6doineest inculte:le systbmeabsurdedes jacheresest cause que le
troisiemequart ne produitrien ou produitpeu; et telle est la langueurdes culturesgrecques,
que le quatriemequartqui estmis en rapport,ne donnepas le tiersde ses produitspossibles."
On the basis of Macedonianexports,"on seraittent de juger favorablement
de l'tat des
cultivateurs;
mais on se tromperait.
Cette surabondancede productionsne prouve rien pour
leur bonheur,parce qu'elle n'est point l'excedentdu necessaire.Dans les ctats oui les paysans
jouissentde la plenitudede leursdroitscivils,commedans la plus grandepartiede l'Europe,
rienne se vend qu'on n'ait pourvudu moinsau necessaire;c'est alorsle vrai superflu
que l'on
exporte.Mais dans les pays qui se rapprochent
de l'etat de ces contreesou une multitudede
Negresest mise en actionpar le fouetde quelques Blancs,l'exportation
n'estjamais en proportionexacteavec. l'abondance"aU, des milliersd'individustravaillent
a produirepour un tries
petitnombre.La, de petitstyransreunissentla masse de travailde tout un canton,pour la
devorerseuls. . . . En Macedoinecomme en Pologne, les paysansmeurentde faim, et les
seigneursregorgent
d'or."
Beaujour is manifestly
describingthe Jifliksystemof land tenurein Macedonia.See also
Michoff,
Beitrige,II. Osterreichische
Konsularbertichie,
I, 5.
63Olivier,
Voyage,II, Io8-9, 114-24, 138-40.
64Ibid., pp. i63-64; J. L. S. Bartholdy,Voyage en Grece fait dans les annees 1803 et
I804 (Paris, I807), II, 49.
258
Traian Stoianovich
Ottoman
ofdomestic
textile
manufactures
officialdom
in theprotection
waned.RamiMehmedPasha,GrandVizier,deviseda plan in 1703
forthegeneralimprovement
thefounding
ofnewtextile
ofindustry,
manufactures
in Constantinople,
Adrianople,
and Salonika,and the
encouragement
in BrusaofGreekmanufactures
ofcertain
silkfabrics
hitherto
imported
fromtheeast.To protect
theseindustries
theGrand
Vizier forbadethe exportation
of neededraw materials.
But the
vizierateof Rami Mehmedsoon felland the projects"to establish
clothand silk-fabric
manufactures
in thestatesoftheGrandSeigneur
fellwithhim,"according
to theFrenchAmbassador,
who possessed
definite
of new and rival
instructions
to baror hamperthecreation
manufactures
in Turkey.'Dilatoryattempts
to promote
did
industry
notceasealtogether,
butthepoorqualityandhighinitialpricesofnew
textilemanufactures
and thestate'sfailureto subsidizedomestic
industries
and excludeforeignmanufactures
by protective
tariffs,
preventedthesuccessofOttoman
mercantilist
experiments.
SarandoPapadopoulo,
Greekmerchant
and holderof a patentor
beratplacinghim undertheprotection
of France,triedduringthe
1760's to foundsoap "factories"
in Coronand Navarino.His plans,
to preventthe
however,
miscarried,
forFrenchconsulsintervened
creationof manufactures
of
with the soap industry
competitive
Marseilles
and Provence.72
Upon returning
froma specialinspection
tourof theFrenchconsulates
of theLevantin 1779, Baronde Tott
advisedhis Government
to continue
theobstruction
of all efforts
to
startnewindustry
in theOttomanEmpire.73
SeveralyearsearliertheFrenchmerchant
ClaudeFlachat(c. I7I0to FrancewithGreekweaversand spinners
I775) had returned
from
masters
of techniques
If industry
unknownin theWest.74
Smyrna,
thrived
amongtheGreeksin a fewplacesonly,it was notforlack
of talentor enterprise
butforlack of systematic
protection.
Rarely
finding
incentive
to investin vulnerable
fixedindustrial
capital,the
commercial
classesputbacktheirprofits
intocommerce.
When,at the
71 Stoianovich,
"L'economiebalkanique,"pp. 344-45; A. N., Archievsde la Marine (hereaftercitedas A. M.), B7 7I, fol. I54, instructions
to A. M. de Ferriol,FrenchAmbassadorto
to Lebret,
Nov. 7, 1703;
thePorte,October
17, I703; A. N., A. M., B' 7I, fol.i68, despatch
A. N., A. M., B775, p. 463, instructions
to Ferriol,July6, I708; A.N., Aff.Etr. B1 384, despatch
fromFerriol,Aug. I6, I703; Svoronos,Le commercede Salonique,p. 397.
72 Stoianovich,
"L'economiebalkanique,"pp. 343-44.
73 A. N., Aff.Etr. BIII 233, Tott memoirdated July8, I779.
74 Sandor Baumgarten,
sur le commerceet sur les arts; notes de voyagede
"Observations
Revue d'histoirecompare, new ser., Vol.
Jean-ClaudeFlachatsur la Hongrie (1740-174I),"
V, No. 3 (I947), p. 86.
1793
[1826]),
p. 63.
Traian Stoianovich
260
to thelegallyforbidden
butwidelyprevalent
exportofgrainsbeyond
theconfines
of theEmpire.77
Macedoniaand Thessalythusexported
duringthesecondhalfof thecentury
40 percentof theirgrainand
overhalftheircotton
andtobaccoproduction.78
The new textilefactories
of Austria,
Saxony,Prussia,and Switzerlandrequiredthewool and cottonof Macedoniaand Thessaly,
and
risingFrench,German,and Italiandemandscausedthe cottonproductionof Macedoniato treblebetweeni720 and i8oo."9Austrian
raw cottonimports
fromMacedoniaand Thessalyrosefroma mere
triflein the I720'S
Austrian
cottonimports
fromthe Balkans,by theland routealone,
amounted
to i,900,000 florins.
In 177i, Austrian
woolandcotton
im-
portsfromtheBalkans,
bythelandroutealone,amounted
to fivemillionflorins.8
Balkanwool and cottonwereexportedoverlandto Austriaand
Germanyalmostexclusively
by Balkanmerchants,
mainlyMacedoand hardThessalianand EpiroteGreeksand Vlachs.Sugar,coffee,
to theBalkanson European
ware,on theotherhand,werebrought
in Aegeanand Adriaticports.
shipsforEuropeanmerchants
resident
The western
withthewaysof
merchants,
however,
wereunfamiliar
theBalkanpeoplesand withtheGreek,Turkish,
and Slavictongues,
and weretherefore
forcedto dependon Jewish
brokers
and Greek,
to disposeoftheirmerchandise
in theBalkan
Vlach,and Slavcarters
interior.
FromAegean,Ionian,Adriatic,
orBlackSea ports,
Balkanmuleteers
77 Stoianovich,"L'economiebalkanique,"pp. I30-3I
and passim.
78 Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv(Vienna) (hereaftercited as H.H.S.A.), St A. Tirkei
V/25, undated anonymousmemoiron the commerceof Macedonia, probablywrittenca.
de Salonique,pp. 364-66.
1775 (in Italian); Svoronos,Le commerce
79Ibid., p. 245; H.H.S.A., St A. Tiirkei V/25, undated anonymousmemoir in Italian
on thecommerceof Macedonia,ca. I775; H.H.S.A., St A. Tirkei 1/230, undatedand unsigned
memoirin Italianon the importand exportcommerceof AustriawithTurkeyand the Levant,
"L'economiebalkanique,"pp. 86, 275
ca. i8oo-6; Stoianovich,
80 H.H.S.A., St A. TiirkeiV/26, "Votum des Freyherrn
von Borie uiberden Commercien
dd' JanuarI0, 1I766, in Betreffder Schadlichkeitdes TiirkischenHandels."
Raths-Vortrag
source
Borie was a memberof the AustrianStaatsrat,at least in I767. Anothercontemporary
lower importfigure,but Borie's estimateis probablycloserto the truth.
gives a considerably
under Maria Theresiain der
bsterreichs
Cf. Mariannev. Herzfeld,"Zur Orienthandelspolitik
Geschichte(hereaftercited as AfnG),
Archiv far dsterreichische
Zeit von I740-I77I,"
HandelspolitikunderMaria Theresia
AdolfBeer,"Die 5sterreichische
289;
274,
CVIII (1920),
und JosefII," AfoG,LXXXVI (I899), 123, I86. The figuresI have myselfcitedshouldperhaps
be raisedto accountforsmuggling.
oneAfog,CVIII (I920), 277-78. Approximately
"ZurOrienthandelspolitik,"
81 Herzfeld,
to Germany
fourthof the Austriancottonimportsfromthe OttomanEmpirewere re-exported
and Switzerlandin the 1760's.
262
Traian Stoianovich
market.
on theMacedonian
ofBohemiaandAustria,
textile
production
of theWar of American
Independence,
thetextile
Bytheconclusion
ofBelgium,
and Germany,
carriedsouthofthe
Austria,
manufactures
were offering
Danube and into Macedoniaby Balkanmerchants,
to Frenchclothbroughtintothe Balkansby
merciless
competition
Salonika,and theAdriaticports.84
wayof Constantinople,
landlords,
officials,
powerofOttoman
The increase
inthepurchasing
of "luxury"
allowedan increasein the importation
and merchants
werethefurs
of theseluxuries
products.
Amongthemostimportant
broughtto Conof Russia,whichGreekand Armenianmerchants
andtoMacedonia,
tothegreatautumn
fairofUzundzovo,
stantinople,
andThessaly.
Epirus,
or envoyto the SublimePorte
FearingthattheRussianresident
mightseize the liquid fundstheyobtainedin exchangefor their
drawnon theRussian
letters
ofcredit
costly
fursandgivetheminstead
Russianfurtraders
Russiancurrency,
Courtto be paidin depreciated
darednotbringtheirgoodstotheOttoman
capital.Constantinopolitan
Macedonia,
GreeksandArmenians,
GreeksandVlachsfromThessaly,
and Bulgarians
and Epirus,and a smallernumberof Macedo-Slavs
of Russianfursfor
becamethechiefand onlysuppliers
consequently
theOttomandominions.
Russianmerchants
avoidedcomingto theOttomanEmpire;Ottoof
manmerchants
therefore
wentto Russia.Butsincethemerchants
Moscow and Kiev desiredHungariansequins,Italian silks,and
Leipzigcloth,andsinceViennaandthefairsofLeipzigwerethemost
merchants
oftenwent
convenient
Ottoman
placestofindthesearticles,
to Leipzigor Viennabeforeproceeding
to Russia.A three-cornered
in Contradethusdeveloped,
withone of thepointsof thetriangle
of
community
Uzundzovo,Janina,or the fur-making
stantinople,
thesecondpointin theGermanies,
andthethirdat Nezhin,
Kastoria,
a smalltownnortheast
or evenin
of Kiev and southof Chernigov,
Kievor Moscow.85
84 A. N., Aff.Etr. B"'I I90, "Rapportfaitau Bureaudu commercedu Levant" by Montaran,
esp. pp. 190-93, 313; A. N., A. M., B7 452, memoiron the cloth trade,June 20, 1787;
Svoronos,Le commercede Salonique,p. I82.
85 Stoianovich,"L'6conomie balkanique," pp. I63-65; H. Gandev, "T'rgovskataobmena
na Evropa s b'lgarskitezemi prez XVIII i nac'alotona XIX vek" [European trade with the
Bulgarianlands duringthe eighteenthand beginningof the nineteenthcenturies],Godisnik
na SofliskijaUniversitet,
Istorikofilologileski
Fakultet(Annuairede l'Universitede Sofia), XL
(1943-44), 24; (Antoine-Ignace)Anthoine,Essai historiquesur le commerceet la navigation
de la Mer Noire (2d rev. ed.; Paris, I 820), p. 82; Ibrahim Manzour-Efendi(Samson
d'Ali Pacha (Paris,
Cerfberr),Memoiressur la Grece et l'Albanie pendantle gouvernement
theSavaRiver.
Following
thewarofI737-I739, Austria
hadtogive
264
Traian Stoianovich
underthecentralized
control
ofVienna.Hungary,
although
theoreticallya separate
kingdom,
obtainedonlylimitedrightsof autonomy
and was notallowedto makeTransylvania
an integral
partof her
territory.
SlavoniaandVojvodinawereorganized
as a military
frontier
of the ImperialWar Councilin
district
underthe administration
Vienna.Until i779, when it was incorporated
into Hungary,the
Banatwassimilarly
governed
bya special"Administration"
appointed
bythecentralgovernment.
The warsofthesixteenth
had turnedthe
and seventeenth
centuries
Pannonian
basinintoa desolatemarshland
and depopulated
grassland
in whichlurkednumerous
robberbands.Malariakepttheremaining
of theareain ill health,and epidemicdiseasesprevented
inhabitants
themfrommultiplying.
of Hungary-without
In i700 thepopulation
notmuch
Transylvania
butwiththeBanatand Croatia-Slavonia-was
overtwomillions.
The population
ofTransylvania
did notmuchexceed 500,000.To do awaywithbrigandage,
protectits peopleand
economy
fromtherazziasof willfulTurkishor Bosnianbeys,curb
the rebellious
Hungarianand Transylvanian
nobility,
and createa
colonialraw-material
area forthe needsof the
and food-producing
industry
of Bohemiaand Austria,
thegovernment
ofViennadecided
toundertake
thesystematic
repopulation
ofthenewterritories
andthe
therein
ofhealthier
establishment
conditions
oflife.
The recolonization
of Hungaryand Vojvodinabeganin i690 with
the settlement
of tensof thousands
of Serbianrefugees
fromOld
Serbia,
whowereeagertomaketheirhomestherebecausetheEmperor
hadpromised
themreligious
freedom
anda formoflimited
communal
a promiselaterviolated.A systematic
enautonomy,
recolonization,
bothbythestateandgreatlandowners,
couraged
beganafterthepeace
of Passarowitz.
Amongthenew settlers
therewerenot onlySerbs,
Croats,and Magyars,but Greeks,Vlachs,Rumanians,Bulgarians,
Albanians,
Ukrainians,
Czechs,Slovaks,
Swiss,and Italians.Alsatians,
Lorrainers,
andGermans
fromthecongested
ruralareasoftheRhineland and southwestern
Germany,however,were probablymore
numerous
thanany othersingleethnicgroupof new immigrants.
Throughthisgreatcolonization
effort,
moreimportant
eventhanthe
eighteenth-century
settlement
of theEnglishcoloniesor theRussian
of the Ukraineand SouthRussia,the populationof
colonization
Transylvania
grewto a millionin I754, I,400,000 in I787, and I,62I,-
hardly
a single
townwithmorethan20,000 inhabitants.
In 1805,when
its totalpopulation
exceededthatof EuropeanTurkey,it
probably
had onlysixor seventownswithmorethan20,000 inhabitants
each,
andthesetownstogether
didnotcontain
morethanI5ooooinhabitants,
verylargelynon-Magyar.87
BeforetheFrenchRevolution,
Hungary
a nativeMagyarmiddleor merchant
was virtually
without
class.
In viewof therapidgrowthof theruraland slowerexpansion
of
the urbansectorof the Hungarianeconomy,
mercantile
functions
wereappropriated
bytheonlyethnicgroupsgeographically
closeand
psychologically
ableto adjustthemseves
to theconditions
ofbusiness
in an economically
area: Greeks,
expanding
butstillunderdeveloped
Macedo-Vlachs,
Jews,Armenians,
and bothHabsburgand Ottoman
Serbs.Germanimmigrants
fromwesternEurope were generally
peasants
and oftenindigent.
Amongthetemporary
or permanent
imfromtheBalkans,thereweretheold-time
migrants
merchants:
Jews
and Armenians.
Therewerealso thepastoral
folk-Serbsand Vlachs
-with seminomadic
habits,readierto adapt themselves
to the
exigencies
of commerce
thanto thedrudgeries
of thesoil.Manyimmigrants
fromOld Serbiaand Macedonia,moreover,
had beenmer-
266
Trajan Stoianovich
onlylogicalthattheSerbsofHungary-native
or long-term
residents,
newimmigrants,
and Ottomansubjects-should
capturemuchofthe
Hungarian
retailtradeandan important
oftheforeign
segment
trade
of Austriaand HungarywiththeOttomanEmpire.The recolonizationpoliciesofViennaand thesuccesses
ofHabsburgSerbmerchants
and artisans
soonattracted
to Austriaand
Greeksand Macedo-Vlachs
andtheGreekandVlachmerchants
even
Hungary,
provedthemselves
moreenterprising,
commercially
better-informed,
and favoredwith
better
business
connections
thantheSerbs.
The Austrian
and Hungarianauthorities,
whileneedingand welcomingthe commerce
of bothOttomanand HabsburgSerbsand
Greeks,tookoccasionalpunitiveor restrictive
measuresagainstthe
commerce
of Ottomansubjects.
Successive
edictsand decrees,
aiming
to setboundsto thepropensity
to engagein
of Ottomanmerchants
"alla minuta
Handel,"restricted
theretailtradeto taxpaying
residents
andHabsburg
subjects
andprohibited
Balkanmerchants
fromretailing
theirgoodsexceptat thenumerous
and flourishing
Hungarian
fairs.89
In i74i theBanatAdministration
limited
thetradeofOttoman
Greek
to the threecommunities
merchants
of Temesvar(Timi~oara),
Pancevo,and Mehadia,wheretheywereallowedto sell theirgoods
toretailers,
butnottoretailthemthemselves.90
Theserestrictions,
howandwerenotstrictly
enforced.
ever,werefrequently
violated
Greek,Macedo-Vlach,
and Serbianmerchants,
together
withJews
andArmenians,
cameto control
ofWallachia
notonlythecommerce
andMoldavia,butofHungary,
Vojvodina,
Croatia-Slavonia,
and part
ofTransylvania
and Moravia.We findsuchmerchants
in theeighteenthcentury
in Nis',Vidin,Belgrade,Zemun,SremskiKarlovci,
Petrovaradin,
Novi Sad, Subotica,Slankamen,
Titel,Osijek,Ruma,
Zagreb,Karlovac,Sisak,Petrinja,
Fiinfkirchen
(Pecs or Pecuj), Baja,
Futog,Siklos,Gy6r (Raab), Veszprem,Stuhlweissenburg
(Szekesor Stoni Beograd),Heves, Borsod,Jaszbereny,
fehervar
Komorn,
Tokaj, Sopron,Szeged,Szentes(foundedc. i750), Balassagyarmat,
Ebes-Falva(Epersdorf),Szamos-Ujvar,
Pressburg(Pozsony,today
HerCronstadt
Bratislava),
(Brasovor, in Greek,Stephanoupolis),
mannstadt
(Sibiu),andClausenburg
(Cluj)." In I754, 403 Ottoman
89 H.H.S.A., St A. TuirkeiV/26, "Votumdes Freyherrn
von Borie." See also Herzfeld,"Zur
HandelsOrienthandelspolitik,"
AfoG, CVIII (I920), 254-55, 302; Beer, "Die 6sterreichische
politik,"AfnG,LXXXVI (1899), 33.
90Popovic,0 Cincarima,p. 105.
91 Ibid., pp. II8-21; Kostic,Dositej Obradovic,p. 217; Marczali,Hungaryin the Eighteenth
Century,
p. 73; Demian,Tableau geographique,
I, 207-8; H.H.S.A., St A. TuirkeiV/26, "Votum
Handel in den Erblanden;"
des Freyherrn
von Borie,"Jan.ia, I766; ibid.,memoir:"Tiirkischer
268
Trajan Stoianovich
13
I.I
I
A
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '
??~~ iv
ok
cr
<
pq
ED'
,'
~ ~ ~ ~~~~-
7'
2
0
At~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0~~~~~~~~~~~
o0
C~~~~
*0~~~~
270
Trajan Stoianovich
oftheFleet,or undersecretary
oftheNavyand
vizier,anddragoman
chargeof Aegean affairs.
For a centuryafterI716 the officeof
hospodar
ofMoldaviaandWallachia,whichhad at itsdisposalmany
lucrative
appointments,
and other
monopolies,
government
contracts,
privileges,
becamethe closelyguardedproperty
of the Phanariotes,
Greekpatriciate
or "noblessede robe" of Constantinople.
Under
Phanariote
theOttomanGovernment
abolishedtheSerbian
pressure,
patriarchate
in I766 andthearchbishopric
ofOchrida(Ohrid)in i767
and placedtheirdiocesesunderthedirectcontrolof thepatriarchate
of Constantinople.
Executive
powerremained
in Moslemhands,but
the patriciate
of Constantinople
and otherprivileged
Greekswere
turned
intoa loosely
organized
orderoftechnical
andpolitical
advisers,
whosemembers
dreamed
oftherestoration
ofByzantium
andplanned
theestablishment
of Greekpoliticaland economichegemony
in the
Balkans.96
to commonbelief,
Contrary
veryfewPhanariotes
weredescendants
of theold Byzantine
aristocracy.
Mostof themweremenof wealth
whohad wontheirrichesas traders
in theAegean,the
and peddlers
Ottomancapital,theDanubianprincipalities,
Russia,and the Black
Sea. A fewacquiredtheirinitialwealthin Constantinople,
butmany
madetheirfortunes
firstin Smyrna,
Chios,Janina,
or Kastoriaand
thensettled
in thecapitalwiththeobjectofestablishing
politicalcontactsandfriendships
in orderto makesuretheywouldbe ableto pass
on theirrichestotheirdescendants.
To winwealthwas easierthanto
or transfer
keep,consolidate,
it to futuregenerations.
Manywealthy
merchants
therefore
sought
tobecomeprovisioners
ofthecapital,
credi96Woodhouse,The Greek War of Independence,p. 27; Nicolas Svoronos,Histoirede la
Grece moderne("Que sais-je?" No. 578) (Paris: PressesUniversitaires
de France, I953), p.
28; Ladislas Hadrovics,Le people serbe et son Eglise sous la dominationtorque (Paris:
PressesUniversitaires
de France,I947), pp. I52-53; Harold W. Temperley,Historyof Serbia
(London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd., I9I7), pp. i62-67; CharlesJelavich,
"Some Aspectsof Serbian
ReligiousDevelopmentin the EighteenthCentury,"Church History,XXIII (I954), I48;
G. GeorgiadesArnakis,"The Greek Church of Constantinople
and the OttomanEmpire,"
Journalof Modern History,XXIV (I952),
247; Theodore H. Papadopoulos,Studies and
DocumentsRelatingto theHistoryof the GreekChurchand People underTurkishDomination
(Bibliothecagraeca aevi posterioris,
I) (Brussels:printedby De Meester,Wetteren,I952), pp.
44, 49-60, I39-49; Leopold Ranke, The Historyof Servia,and the ServianRevolution,with
in Bosnia (to which is added, The Slave Provincesof Turkey,
a Sketchof the Insurrection
chieflyfromthe Frenchof CyprienRobert),trans.Mrs. AlexanderKerr (London: Henry G.
Bohn, i853), pp. 30-31; Gottwald,"Phanariotische
Studien,"LVjsfSOE, V, 9-I;
Karadzic',
Danica. . . 1827, pp. II4-I6. For a briefhistory
of Greeksin theservice
of thePorte,see:
"Les Grecsau servicede 1'Empireottoman,"Le cinq-centiame
anniversaire
P. A. Argyropoulo,
de la prisede Constantinople
2e ser.,7e annee,fasc.h. s.) (Athens,
(L'Hellenismecontemporain,
1953), pp 151-77.
272
Traian Stoianovich
becamethechiefgathering
Levant,andAmsterdam
placeofLevantine
inall ofwestern
merchants
Europe.98
It is difficult
to gaugetheexactimportance
ofthedevelopment
ofa
Greekpatriciate
upon the expansionof Greekmercantile
activities,
forotherfactors
alsofavored
theexpansion
of Greekcommerce.
But
thepartlyunconscious
decisionof theOttomangovernment
to promote the creationof a Greek "noblessede robe" and financial
bourgeoisie
no doubtaidedthewidening
and deepening
ofthetrade
ofGreekmerchants.
EveninItaly,whereGreekshad carried
on a brisk
tradesincethebeginning
of thesixteenth
century,
Greekcommerce
expanded.
Greektraders
swarmed
in theeighteenth
century
notonly
toVenice,Ancona,andLivorno,
but
wheretheyhadbeenlongpresent,
to thefairof Senigallia,
thefair"la plusmarchande"
in all of Italy
aroundI75o,99 and to the kingdomof Naples,especially
to Lecce,
Barletta,
Naples,and Bari."' To attribute
thisexpansion
to theriseof
the Phanariotes
alone is to be blindaltogether
to otherimportant
factors,
but to overlookthe contributions
of the rise of a Greek
patriciate
to thegrowthofGreektradeis alsoblindness.
The growthof Greekeconomicpowerfacilitated
the growthof
Greekbargaining
powerin politics
andfinance,
justas theacquisition
of advisory
politicalauthority
had allowedthemto obtainnew economicadvantages.
Hardpressed
bythedemandsofhisrebellious
and
undisciplined
Janissary
troopsanddiscontented
urbanpopulaceandin
needof somepublicsupport,
desperate
SelimIII had to yieldto the
of Demetrios
suggestions
Mouroutsis
to allowtheGreeksto forma
tradingcompanyor guild of "Europeanmerchants"
possessing
virtuallyall the privilegesof westernEuropeantradersin the
Whilethepolitical
Empire.'0'
andeconomic
ofthePhanariote
successes
98 Stoianovich,"L'conomie balkanique,"pp. I70-7I. On AdamantiosKorais as an agent
in Amsterdam,
see StephenGeorgeChaconas,AdamantiosKorais; a Studyin GreekNationalism
(New York: ColumbiaUniversity
Press,I942), pp. 17-20; on JohnPriggos,a wealthyGreek
merchantin Amsterdam,
see L. S. Stavrianos,Balkan Federation:a Historyof the Movement
towardBalkan Unityin ModernTimes (Smith College Studiesin History,vol. XXVII, Nos.
1-4, Oct. 1941-JUly 1942, Northampton,
Mass.) (Menasha, Wisc.: printedby George Banta
PublishingCo., 1944), p. 8, n. I3.
99 On the activityof Greek,Bosnian,and Dalmatianmerchants
at the fairof Senigallia,see:
A. N., Aff.Etr. B1 948, fol. 99, despatchfromLe Maire,Nov. 30, 1762; A. N., Aff.Etr. B"'.
242,
memoirin Italian on Albania by Citizen BartolettiZulattifils,joined to the letterof
GeneralDu Bayet,FrenchAmbassadorto the Porte,dated Sebenico,i Fructidor,year IV;
A. N., Aff.Etr. B' ioi5, lettersof July20, 1722, and Aug. 26, I723, fromCount Beliardy.
100RuggieroRomano,Le commercedu Royaumede Naples avec la France et les pays de
l'Adriatiqueau XVIIIe si'cle (Paris: ArmandColin, i95i), pp. 65, 79, 89.
101G. G. Gervinus,Insurrection
et regeneration
de la Grece, trans.J. F. Minssen and
LeonidasSgouta(Paris: A. Durand,i863), p. 99.
Whiletheinhabitants
Melos,Kimolos,Syros,
andTinos
ofMykonos,
managedto live by theirlabor,theyrarelymanagedto thrive.A
to the rapidaccumulation
of wealthor capital
generalprerequisite
is theinitialreadiness
to use noneconomic
formation
meansand the
to use all economicmeansto achievethesame
readiness
subsequent
of the Greco-Albanian
desiredend. The methodof formation
and
merchant
marinesin theeighteenth
century
suggests
the
Dulcignote
ofthisargument.
plausibility
The razziasofMoslemAlbanians
forced
manyGreeksandOrthodox
Albanians
fromtheGreekmainlandand Moreato theislandsof the
century,
fugitive
Aegeanand Ionianseas. Earlyin the eighteenth
virtually
unOrthodox
Albanianssettledon thebarrenand hitherto
islandsof Hydraand Spetsai,whileGreekssettledon the
inhabited
102
G. F. Hertzberg,GeschichteGriechenlands
(Gotha, 1876-79),
III,
52;
Olivier,Voyage,
274
Traian Stoianovich
The newcolonists
islandofPsara.'04
lackedtheinclination
toworkor
becomedevotedcultivators
ofthesoil,andtherockysoildidnotoffer
newtemptations.
To earna living,Hydriotes,
andPsariotes
Spetsiotes,
embarked
uponthesometimes
fruitful
buttechnically
or
noneconomic,
ormaritime
andcoastalbrigandage."05
venture
ofpiracy,
extraeconomic,
Economicattractions,
however,
wereoverwhelming.
The piratesbecamemerchants,
takingsometimes,
it is true,whattheycouldnot
purchase,but increasingly
carrying,
buying,and selling.A noneconomic
venture
becameeconomic.
The overpowering
economic
attraction
fromthepossibility
stemmed
of makinga quickfortune
by transporting
winesurpluses
fromthe
Aegeanto Russiaand grainsurpluses
fromtheBalkanor Anatolian
mainlands,
andlaterfromtheDanubianprincipalities
andtheUkraine,
to thegrain-deficient
islandsoftheAegeanand to Naples,Marseilles,
and otherportsof the grain-hungry
Mediterranean.
Balkan and
Anatolian
surpluses
weregreater
in theeighteenth
century
becauseof
thedeliberate
effort
on thepartof Ottomanlandlords
to reducethe
percapitaconsumption
oftheirtenants.
Theywerealsogreater,
however,becauseoftheintroduction
ofa newgraincrop,maizeor Indian
corn.
Maize cultivation
beganin theBalkansin theseventeenth
century
andspreadrapidly
throughout
thepeninsula.
Little,
however,
is known
of thecircumstances
of itsdiffusion
untilafteri700. The cultivation
of the new crop may have begunin the Danubianprincipalities
shortly
afteri650, but it acquiredimportance
thereonlya century
later.ByI7i6 maizewasa noteworthy
exportcommodity
ofDurazzo
and themaingraincropofSerbia.It appearsto havebeencultivated
inHerzegovina
before
I740 andwasthechief
graincropofMontenegro
beforeI780. Aroundthemiddleofthecentury,
it was introduced
into
MoreafromDulcigno(Ulcinj). By I774, it was an important
export
articleofEpirus,whichshippedbothwheatand maizefromArtato
Livorno.'06
104 Hertzberg,
Geschichte
Griechenlands,
III,
Toynbee,A StudyofHistory,VIII, 174-75.
210;
I85-91;
Raicevich, Osservazioni, p.
56; Gottwald,"Phanariotische
Studien," LVjsfSOE, V (I94I),
30; Dusan Pantelic',"Popis
pogranicnihnahija Srbijeposle Pozarevac'kogmira" [Census of the frontier
districts
of Serbia
afterthe peace of Passarowitz],Spomenik,XCVI, 2d cl., Book 75 (Belgrade,I948), p. 31;
P. D. gerovic,"0 rasprostranjenosti
licnog imena Njegos" [The spatial expansionof the
personalname Njegos], IstoriskiZapisi, I. Nos. 5-6 (Cetinje,May-June1948), p. 370.
109Stoianovich,
"L'&conomie
balkanique,"
pp.i i o-I 2.
110Pouqueville,Voyageen Moree,I, 518, 520; II, 265-66.
i11 Ibid.; Bernard Vonderlage,Die Handelspolitischen
BeziehungenHamburgs und Griechenlandsvon 5832 his i867 (Hamburg: Cram, De Gruyter& Co., 1954), p. 2i; Thomas
Gordon,Historyof the Greek Revolution(2d ed.; Edinburgh,i844), I. 35; Toynbee,A
StudyofHistory,VIII, I76n. For estimates
of thesize of the Greekor Greco-Albanian
merchant
marinein the Napoleonicand pre-independence
era, see also Stavrianos,Balkan Federation,
p. 3I; A. A. Pepelasis,"The Legal Systemand EconomicDevelopmentof Greece," journal
ofEconomicHistory,
XIX ( 959), 176,n. i I.
276
Traian Stoianovich
thenew maritime
communities
grewbecause
moreover,
Ambelakia,
in "spotsoutofthewayofmanand comtheywerewell concealed,
oftradeand tourist
merce"112 notoutofthewayofmodernchannels
century.
travel,
butoutofthewayofthetraderoutesoftheeighteenth
Macedo-Thessalian
and EpiroteForwarders
ofThessaly,
Epirus,and
inhabitants
The GreekandVlachhighland
who
another
exampleofthe"free"but"wretched"
Macedoniapresent
makefortunes.
The pastoral
obtaineda livelifolkofthesehighlands
hoodfrom
brigands,
themenwereherdsmen,
occupations:
fiveprincipal
soldiers,
and
muleteers,
and
mercenary
workers
seasonalmigratory
ofthePindusoften
The pastors
whilethewomenwereskilledweavers.
the year.Seekinggreen
did not dwellin a fixedplace throughout
intothe
anddescended
insummer
themountain
pastures,
theyclimbed
ofinSincesmallnumbers
lowlandsandapproached
theseain winter.
cansupervise
largeherds,mentendedtobecomesuperfluous.
dividuals
of economicfunctheexercise
Men unableto earna livingthrough
At thetimeof theirconquest
tionsconsequently
turnedto banditry.
and tax
localautonomies
oftheBalkanpeninsula,
theTurksgranted
communities,
whichtheymaderesponsipastoral
exemptions
tocertain
bleforkeepingmountain
passesfreeofbanditsand opento travelers.
tookadvantage
oftheir
The guardsofthepasses,however,
sometimes
The expansion
to engagein brigandage
themselves.
specialprivileges
openedotheroccupasubsequently
century
of townsin thesixteenth
tionsto thepastoralruralfolk.Youngersonsand menwho lacked
fromtheirhomesfora
robbery
departed
herdsortheurgetohighway
and unskilled
seasonor a yearto workas pecalbarior semiskilled
in distant
towns,evenin theOttomancapital.The womenlaborers
and
of theircommunities,
spinning,
dyeing,
folkbecametheartisans
the
blankets
and
for
the
cold
of
the
into
herds
carpets
weaving wool
valley.
andbitter
ofthehighmountain
andwindswept
winters
nights
of raw-material
The availability
cheese,and skinssurpluses-wool,
themigratory
andcraft
habitsofthemenandtheirintimate
products,
of
the
difficult
which
routes,theirspecialprivileges,
knowledge
to allowthespreadto
allowedthemtobeararms,andtheirreluctance
of theseignorial
themountain
whichenveloped
ever-larger
reaction,
areasof thecoasts,plains,and valleysafteri6oo,finally
a
persuaded
112Urquhart,Turkeyand Its Resources,
p. 54.
278
Trajan Stoianovich
resident
inViennain i766,
merchants
OftheGreekandGreco-Vlach
and
(Woscopoli)116and Siatista,
one thirdcamefromMoschopolis
almostone half fromKastoria,Melnik,Tyrnavos,Argyrokastro,
of the
Of the58 members
Janina,
Razlog,Larissa,and Monastir."7
ofTokaj,onehalfwere
orguildofGreekmerchants
Tokaj Company,
fromKozaneand Kastoriain I762. Of the76 Greekor Greco-Vlach
families
in Croatiain I774 and the8i Greekor Greco-Vlach
resident
resident
in thetown
families
resident
in Sremandthegoorso families
almostonefourth
ofZemunc. I770, onethirdcamefromMoschopolis,
fromthevillages
and almostone fifth
fromthevillageofKatranitsa,
tableshowsin detailtheplace
The following
ofBlatseand Kleisoura.
of theTokaj Companyand of the
oforiginoftheGreekmerchants
of
in Croatia,
in theprovince
GreekandGreco-Vlach
families
resident
Srem,andinthetownsofZemunandVienna,c. I770:
PLACE OF
ORIGIN 18
Moschopolis
Katranitsa
Kozane
Blatse
Siatista
Kleisoura
Kastoria
Melnik
Verroia
Tyrnavos
Argyrokastro
28
i8
3
II
Srem
Zemun
29
29
20
I6
98
I2
54
I
I-2
22
II
Total
3I-32
27
I8-I9
I-2
I-2
I-2
I7-I8
I6-I7
I-2
I 2-I3
I2
4
4
II
9
4
Janina
Monastir
Larissa
Razlog
Niaousta
Srem
Zemun
I-2
I-3
2
2-5
I
3
2
2
I
Servia
x6
19
10
IO
Unknown
Total
Total
7
I66
76
8i
82-88
65-67
58
I6
362-370
Vakalopoulos,Oi dytikomakedones
apodemoi,pp.
13-14.
Trajan Stoianovich
280
Io
WO~
N
)\
c~~0
~~~0 ~ ~
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000,
0~~~~~~~~~~~C
0~~~~~~~~
.0
~ ~
Ci
Chainof Fairs
EasternRhodopeand Balkan
Zone of CarryingVillages
Blatse
2. Kleisoura
3. Kozane
4. Selitsa
5. Siatista
6. Grevena
7. Bogatsko
8. Niaousta
9. Katranitsa
Verroia
Metsovon
i2.
Kerasovon
I3. Larissa
Ambelakia
I4.
I5. Tyrnavos
i6. Argyrokastro
i0.
i i.
I7.
Tepelene
i9.
Moschopolis
i8. Selenice
20.
2i.
22.
23.
24.
8ipiska
Edessa
Kastoria
Monastir
Seres
25.
Stanimaka
27.
Razlog
26. Melnik
28. Panagjuriste
29. Koprivtidca
30.
3I.
32.
Karlovo
Kalofer
Gabrovo
intothezone in whichMacedo-Slavs,
northward
and eastwardinto
thezone in whichBulgarians,
werethepredominant
ethnicgroup.
Four principal
of
obstructed
factors
thedevelopment a Bulgarian
merchant
class:i) The population
oftheBlackSea andAegeancoasts
wasmainly
andArmenian;
Greek,Turkish,
Tatar,Jewish,
2) Bulgaria
was the hinterland
of fourmajorOttomancities(Constantinople,
Adrianople,
Philippopolis,
and Sofia),eachofwhichneededtheproductionof the Bulgarianpeasantand consequently
set limitsupon
theexportation
of his goodsbeyondtheconfines
of theEmpire;3)
and Armenian
merchants
virtualmonopoly
Greek,Jewish,
possessed
tothetradeofConstantinople
rights
withtheeastern
Balkans;and4)
littleof the produceof Bulgariacould be marketed
in Wallachia,
Serbia,or Bosnia,becauseofthebasically
similaragricultural
productionof thefourareas.
Bulgarian
merchants
withGreeknamesand of Greekculturemay
haveengagedsporadically
in international
tradebeforetheeighteenth
The roleof Bulgarian
century.
traders,
however,
was negligible
until
aboutI750, whenthe Greeksand Bulgariansof the Rhodopeand
StaraPlanina(Balkan Mountainsas theyare identified
in central
Bulgaria) villages of Stanimaka,Melnik, Razlog, Panagjuri'ste,
Koprivs'tica,
Karlovo,Kalofer,
andGabrovobegantomakelongcommercialodysseys
to Russiaand Hungary.BytheI780's Bulgarian-as
well as Greek,Jewish,
and Armenian-merchants
werein business
evenin Adrianople
and Philippopolis.
Bulgariantradersand carters
remained
nonethelessuntilthepeasantsand
relatively
unimportant
folkoftheRhodopeand Balkanmountain
pastoral
systems
descended
en massefromtheirheightsto thefoothills,
valleys,
and coastlands,
whichwere depopulatedby the kirialiwars or wave of TurcoAlbanianbrigandage
of the lastdecadeof the eighteenth
and first
quarterof thenineteenth
century.
The beginnings
of the Bulgarian
merchant
classaretraceable
to theeighteenth
century.
The commerce
of theRhodope,however,
remainedalmostwhollyin Greekhands
untilI750, and Bulgarianmerchants
beganto contestGreekcom-
282
Trajan Stoianovich
mercial
in theeastern
superiority
BalkansonlyaftertheRusso-Turkish
of Adrianople
treaty
of Adrianople(i829). The treaty
deprived
the
Turks (and consequently
also PhanarioteGreeks, Jews,and
of the productsof the
Armenians)of the rightof pre-emption
Danubianprincipalities
and fullyopenedthe regionnorthof the
Danube,not onlyto Europeancommerce,
but to the tradeof the
Bulgarians."2'
SerbianPig Trade
DuringtheAustrian
occupation
of 1718-i739, Serbia'smostim-
portant
exportproduct,
afterwax and honey,was cattle.Serbiawas
notthenan exporter
ofswineand evenimported
pigsfromSremand
theBanat.'22
In i76i, thechiefexports
of theBanatwerestillcattle,
pigs,andcopperore.'23
Afterthisdate,however,
Hungary,
theBanat,
and Slavoniabecameincreasingly
producers
and exporters
of grains
anddeclined
as exporters
ofpigs.'24
To supplement
thecerealeconomy
oftheBanatand thecentral
Hungarianplainand to satisfy
Austrian
whichtheBanatand Hungaryno longermetadequately,
demands,
theSerbsofgumadijabegantoraisepigsforexport,
whichtheyfedon
theacornsoftheirimmense
forests
of oak. Greekand Macedo-Vlach
merchants
and muleteers
wentto Austriawiththeirwooland cotton;
Serbianruralmerchants
wenttherewiththeirpigs.
At the end of the century,
nearlyeverySerbianhouseholdof
Sumadija possessed20 to 200 pigs. Karadjordje,leader of the First
cattle,and i6 horses.'25
Betweeni777 and i786 Hungaryimportedan
averageof i,300,000 francs'(over500,000florins')
worthof pigsfrom
121 On the beginnings
of a Bulgarianmerchantclass, see: Gandev, "T'rgovskataobmena,"
XL (i943-44), 23-24;
Sakazov, BulgarischeWirtschaftsgeGodifnikna SofliskijaUniversitet,
schichte,pp. 246, 250-52;
Ferrieres-Sauveboeuf, Memoires historiques,II, 249-50; Stella
Hadschi-Petrowa,
"Die geistigeFormungdes bulgarischenBurgertums,"
Sudost-Forschungen,
VII, Heft 3/4 (Dec. I942),
de Conpp. 654-6i; Bratianu,"Etudes sur l'approvisionnement
stantinople,"
Etudes byzantines,
p. 174; Mehlan, "Grundlinien,"Sudostdeutsche
Forschungen,
III (i939), 736; Mehlan,"Mittel-und Westeuropa,"Sudostdeutsche
Forschungen,
III (1938),
95.
122 Pavlovic',
"Finansijei privreda,"Glas,LXIV, 2d cl.,Book 40, p. 23.
123 Kosti, Dositej Obradovic, pp. 13-14.
124 Bicanic',Doba manufacture,
pp. 242, 328-29; Demian, Tableau geographique,I, 50. In
20 percentof the value of all HungarianexportsCf. Robert
1783, grainsand flourrepresented
Townson,Travelsin Hungarywith a Short Accountof Vienna in the Year 1793 (London,
1797),
p. i98.
I717,
CharlesVI of AustriadeclaredtheAdriaticopen
284
Traian Stoianovich
The AustrianGovernment
initiallyreserved
the rightto export
thegrainsandotheragricultural
oftheBanatand Hungary
surpluses
a privileged
through
company.
Greekand Serbianmerchants
thereforerestricted
theircommercefor severaldecadeschieflyto the
intoTurkeyof gunsfromStyriaand Carinthia
smuggling
and the
toFiume,bywayoftheSava-Kupa-Caroline
export
ofSlavonian
route,
cattle.131
Afterthefailureand dissolution
of theprivileged
company
in I773, Balkanmerchants
beganto bringthegrainsoftheBanatand
andsucceeded
HungarytotheAdriatic
wheretheprivileged
company
had failed.Greekand Slav maritime
traders
of theeasternAdriatic
transported
theHungarian
grainsfromFiume,Carlobago(Karlopag),
andTrieste
toVenice,Ancona,andNaples,whencetheyreturned
with
French,Italian,and Englishgoodsdestinedforthe Austrianand
markets.
Hungarian
Bytheturnofthecentury,
thiscommerce
assumeddefinite
patterns.
Certain
Illyrische
Handelsleute
openedbusiness
in Karlovac,
Sisak,and
andthenceconveyed
Petrinja
thegrainsoftheBanatto Carinthia,
the
CroatianMilitary
and theAdriatic
Frontier,
portsof Carlobago,
Senj,
Fiume,and Trieste.A secondgroupof Orthodoxmerchants,
establishedin Zagreb,distributed
thegoodsof theBanatto CivilCroatia
and "Illyria."A thirdgroupdelivered
oats,barley,flour,wine,and
vinegarto Bosniaand returned
to the AdriaticwithSerbianand
Bosniancattle,pigs,lumber,
firewood,
staves,
wax,honey,hides,and
furs.OtherOrthodoxmerchants,
and boatmensuppliedthe
carters,
130 ibid.,p. 136, n. 47; Marczali,Hungary,pp. 82-84; Schwartner,
Statistik,
I, 432.
131 Bicanic,Doba manufacture,
pp. 240-42, 260, n. i9; Popovic,0 Cincarima,pp. ii6-17;
Beer,"Die 6sterreichische
Handelspolitik,"
AfoG,LXXXVI (i899),
17-19.
286
Trajan Stoianovich
residents
of the
twenty
Greekcommercial
familieswerepermanent
townin I767.3'5Afterthe Russo-Turkish
war of I768-I774, many
thousands
of Greeksemigrated
to Russia,Austria,Hungary,and
Corsica.Amongthemwerea number
ofmerchants
whoopenedbusinessin Aquileia,PortoRe (Kraljevica),Gorizia,Gradisca,Fiume,
andZara.'36
The Greekcolonists
ofTrieste,
liketheGreeksofVenice
andotherAdriatic
portsbutunlikethoseofHungary,
wereprincipally
merchant
immigrants
fromoil-producting
Crete,fromMorea,and
fromthe Ionian Islands."37
of
The Greekand Serbianmerchants
Hungarywereessentially
continental
tradersor carters
transplanted
to thePannonianbasinfromThessaly,
Epirus,Macedonia,and Old
Serbia.The Greekand Serbianmerchants
of the northern
Adriatic
wereemigrants
fromtheislandsandhinterlands
oftheAegean,Ionian,
andAdriatic
seas.
The OrthodoxSerbsof Herzegovina
di terre,o
were"coltivatori
vitturini,"
according
to a Ragusancommunique
The inof I788.138
habitants
ofPopovoPoljeandotherOrthodox
Herzegovinians
had,in
fact,servedRagusanmerchants
as assistants
andapprentices
eversince
thesixteenth
century.'39
One couldevenarguethattheRepublicof
St.Blaisemightnothaveattained
hersixteenth-century
maritime
preeminencewithoutthe colonizationof Christianrefugeesfrom
and Bosniaat theendofthefifteenth
Herzegovina
century.'40
Be this
135 Ibid., pp. 175-178; Tomadakis,"'Les communaut6s
d. dsterr.
helleniques,"Mitteilungen
ed. Santifaller(Vienna, I95i), Vol. II, 459.
Staatsarchivs,
Erganzungsband
III, Festschrift,
136 Stoianovich,
"L'economie balkanique,"p. 46; K. N. Kostic',"Gradja za istorijusrpske
trgovine,"
Spomenik,
LXVI, 2d cl., Book 52, pp. I75-77.
137 Tomadakis,"Les communautes
helleniques,"pp. 452, 456.
138 2arko Mulja&ic,"Dubrovac'kiizvestajo prilikamau Hercegovini
u proljeceI788 godine"
[Ragusan reporton conditionsin Herzegovinain the springof 1788], Godiinjak Istoriskog
DrultvaBosnei Hercegouine, IV (Sarajevo,1952), 284.
139 JorjoTadic', "Dubrovcanipo juznoj Srbiji u XVI stoljecu" [Ragusansin South Serbia
in thesixteenth
century],GlasnikSkopskogNauc'nogDrultva (Bulletinde la SocieteScientifique
de Skoplie), t. VII-VIII, Sectiondes Sciencessociales,nos. 3-4 (Skoplje, I930), p. 200; Jorjo
(Belgrade,
Tadic, ed., Acta archiviragusinihistoriamBelgradiillustratia,vol. I, I521-157I
La Mediterranle,
p. 274; Josef2ontar,
1950), pp. X-xi, 12, 20, 70-7I, 82, II3, 146; Braudel,
der V6lker Jugoslawiens,"
"Zur Problematikder ilteren Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte
LX (1I952), 376.
des Institutsfuir8sterreichische
Geschichtsforschung,
Mitteilungen
140If any single occurrencecan explain the remarkablegrowthof the Ragusan merchant
marineafter I450, it may be the massive flightto Ragusa of refugeesfrom Bosnia and
Herzegovina.Lopud (Isola di Mezzo), sparselyinhabitedbeforeI450, was soon settledby
many Bosniansand Herzegovinians,who, withinhalf a century,made the island into an
captainsof the island belongedto
important
shipbuilding
center.AroundI550, ten of the fifty
the familyof Sagri (Sagroevic), which was of Bosnianorigin,and a fourthof the Ragusan
merchantfleetwas operated by the inhabitantsof Lopud. After obtainingrecruitsfrom
Herzegovina,the port of Slano similarlybecame a centerof Ragusan shipbuilding.Ragusa's
fromBosnia and
grandeurwas thus not all her own but also that of the new immigrants
Herzegovina,who became,in theirnew homes,the buildersof ships and carriersof goods.
in i757, ii0-i50
theend of thecentury.143
By reducingor eliminatingthe competitionof French shippers,
theWar oftheAustrianSuccessionand theSevenYears'War furthered
theresurgence
of Ragusanshipping.The revivalof the Ragusanmerchant marine,however,began severalyearsbeforei740 and would
likelyhave continueduntil the end of the century,althoughnot so
rapidlyor spectacularly,
withoutthese wars and even those of the
American and French revolutions.The essentialelementsin the
Cf. JorjoTadic, Dubrovackiportreti[Ragusanportraits](Belgrade:SrpskaKnjizevnaZadruga,
I948), pp. 127-28, 2i2; Luigi Villari,The Republicof Ragusa (London: J. M. Dent & Co.,
I904), pp. 273-74, 308-9.
141 BibliothequeNationale (Paris), Fonds Franqais,No. 10772, Reportof Le Maire,French
consulto Ragusa (1758-1764), pp. 84-85.
142 K. N. Kostic,"Gradja za istorijusrpsketrgovine,"Spomenik,LXVI, 2d cl., Book 52,
pp. I65-66; Vinaver,"Trgovina Bara," IstoriskiZapisi, year VI, vol. IX, No. 2 (Cetinje,
1953), pp. 465-67, 472. On the fairof Senigallia,see note 99 and Stoianovich,"L'economie
balkanique,"pp. 178-79.
143Ibid., pp. 114-I7; BibliothequeNationale (Paris), Fonds Franqais,No. 10772, Report
of Le Maire, pp. 87-89, and memoiron Ragusa dated June 1757, p. 122; Felix-Beaujour,
Tableaudu commerce,
II, 256; Villari,RepublicofRagusa,pp. 328, 338.
288
Traian Stoianovich
renewaloftheRagusanmaritime
carrying
trade,as in thegrowthof
theshipbuilding
industry
of Senj and Fiumeand of thecommerce
of Hydraand Trieste,
weretheopportunity
to exportrawmaterials,
especially
wheat,to Italyand Marseilles
fromthecoastalareasof the
eastern
Mediterranean,
and thegeneralgrowthof European,
Russian,
and worldcommerce,
Atlantic,
thehitherto
unprecedented
prosperity
oftheoldMediterranean
andnewAtlantic
society.
BlackSea Trade
A halfcentury
aftertheopeningof the Adriaticto international
trade,theconcept
ofthefreedom
oftheseaswas appliedto theBlack
Sea. The treaty
of Passarowitz
granted
freedom
of commerce
on the
Danubeto Austrian
subjects,
butAustrian
shipsdid notthereby
win
the rightto extendtheirtradeto the sea. The treatyof Kuchuk
Kainarji(I774) authorized
entryand exitthrough
the Bosporusto
Russianmerchant
ships,but the Turksinsistedthisdid not entail
therighttopassto andfromtheMediterranean.
Not untiltheRussoTurkishtreatyof June2I, I783, did Russiaobtainthe indisputable
righttosendhermerchant
shipsthrough
theDardanelles."'
The treaty
of I783permitted
Russianmerchants
to selltheirgoods
toanyOttoman
buyer,
thereby
depriving
specially
privileged
Ottoman
subjectsof theirmonopolyrightsto the purchaseof certainraw
Russianmerchants
materials.
and shipswerethusauthorized
to buy
silk,rice,coffee,
andoliveoil anywhere
in theOttoman
Empireexcept
Constantinople.
They wereevenallowedto exportgrainsthrough
theStraits-ifthesedid notoriginate
in theOttomandominions.
In
oftransit
addition,
theywereno longersubjectto thepayment
duties,
dutiesexacted
ofthemontheirimports
fromtheOttointoandexports
manEmpirewerereducedto 3 percentad valorem,
and theywere
freedfromthepayment
of exceptional
importand exporttaxesand
excises.Similarrights
to Austriain I784, to theUnited
weregranted
Kingdomin i799,toFrancein i802, andtoPrussiain i8o6.'4`
The closingof theBlackSea to theshipping
of thenon-Ottoman
worldhad beenofimmense
to thegrowthof thetradeof
advantage
144 Young, Corps de droitottoman,III, 65-68; Beer, "Die 6sterreichische
Handelspolitik,"
A/iIG,LXXXVI (i899), 82-87; G. I. Bratianu,"Les observations
de M. de Peyssonnel
en I777 sur
1'executiondu trait de Koutchouk-Kainardji,"
Revue historiquedu Sud-est europien, VI
(1929), 347-48.
145 Anthoine,
Essai historique,
pp. I56-57;
Young,Corpsde droitottoman,
III, 68.
Maria Theresa'spersecutionof the OrthodoxChurch drove thousands of Hungarian Serbs to South Russia. Greeks and Orthodox
Albanianslikewisesoughthaven in Russia afterthe Greek revoltin
Morea duringthe Russo-Turkishwar of I768-i774. Potemkin'sand
Catherine'sdecisionto recolonizetheUkraineand createmoderntrading or naval ports at Taganrog, Sebastopol,Kherson, Nikolaev,
Ochakov, and Odessa attractedother Greeks and Habsburg Serbs,
bothas tradersand permanentsettlers.147
To draw some of the more
enterprising
elementsof southeastern
Europe and the easternMediterranean,the Russian governmentexemptedforeignsettlersfrom
the disagreeableobligationof quarteringthe Russian soldieryand
grantedthemthe rightto choose theirown local magistrates.
Greek
sailors,Greek merchants,Greek "pettydealers,"and Greek taverns
and coffeehousesconsequentlybecame a commonsightin the new
Russianports.Odessa,foundedin 1794, was rapidlytransformed
into
a great grain emporium.'48
A Hungarian Serb, Sava Tekelija, who
visitedthe port in i8ii-soon to be the birthplaceof the Philike
Hetairia,fatheredby Greek merchants-observesin his autobiography:'14
290
Traian Stoianovich
VIII
Official
documents
rarelymakea cleardistinction
betweenGreek
andVlachor Greekand Orthodox
A distinction
Albanianmerchants.
notbe absolutely
may,moreover,
essential.
Epirusand southwestern
thenuclearhomeland
Macedonia,
ofVlachsand Orthodox
Albanians,
ofGreeks.Religious
wasalsothehomeland
andcultural
affinities
supthe geographic
plemented
propinquity.
The Vlach and Orthodox
Albanian,
unliketheSerb,lackeda tradition
ofecclesiastical
autonomy.
Finally,in thecentraland easternBalkanzonesGreekwas notonly
thelanguageofculture
butalsothelanguageofbusiness.
Male membersof the morewell-to-do
Vlach and OthodoxAlbanianfamilies
wereconsequently
easilyassimilated
withintheHelleniccommunity;
the womenremainedgenerally
unilingualand thuspreserved
the
ethnicindividuality
ofthetwonational
groups."5
Not onlyVlachsand OrthodoxAlbaniansbut all OrthodoxmerchantsoftheBalkanswerefrequently
identified
in Germany,
Austria,
andHungary
as "Greeks."
After
an official
inspection
tourofHungary
in i755, forexample,the inspectors
advisedthe AustrianGeneral
Commercial
Directorate
thatthetradeof Szentendre
(SentAndreja)
in theComitatofPestwas in thehandsof Greekswho tradedwith
Turkeyand wentregularly
to theLeipzigfairs.The mostfamousof
thesemerchants,
to theirreport,
wereSagarovitz,
Lobanaccording
and the
ovsky,
JanoPopoviz,Ava Kumoviz,thebrothers
Szenkoviz,
All the names,however,
brothers
Prambovan.
appearto be Slavic,
or Armenian,
and Popoviz(Popovic),Kumoviz(Kumovic),
Jewish,
150Popovi6,0 Cincarima,
p. 57.
pp. i6-28; Urquhart,Turkeyand ItsResources,
portanceonlyafteri750.
"Greek."153
IX
Islam is not intrinsically
opposed to commercialand economic
progress.The Moslem merchantsof the early centuriesof Arab
dominationwere accomplishedentrepreneurs.
Ottoman Moslems,
namelyAlbaniansand Bosnian and HerzegovinianSlavs, have also
distinguished
themselves
in commerce.The Turks,however,have not
151Fournier,"Handel und Verkehrin Ungarn," Ao6G, LXIX, erste HHlfte(i887),
pp.
III;
52,
Mehlan,"Grundlinien,"Siidostdeutsche
Forschungen,
292
Traian Stoianovich
playedan important
rolein international
trade,although-contrary
to
generalopinion-theydid sometimes
go to Europe,namelyto
Vienna.'54
After
visiting
Moreain i794, XavierScrofani
ofSicilyobserved
that
theTurksregarded
as "aussivil que celuid'un
thestatusofmerchant
155 Butwhyshould
agriculteur."
thestatusofmerchant
havebeenless
admirablethanthatof tradesman
or artisan?The statusof intraimperialmerchant
was indeednotlessadmirable,
and manyTurks
wereintraimperial
or domestic
Tradersin foreign
traders.
lands,unlikedomestic
merchants,
wereconstantly
subjectto thepressures
and
corrupting
influences
of alien culturesand civilizations.
Organized
politicaland religionsgroupsof the dominantreligionwerefully
consciousof theirholy missionto reduceforeigninfluences
to a
minimum,'56
althoughtheycould neverfullyclose the doors of the
South
Empiretotheattractions
oftheWest.Jews,
Greeks,
Armenians,
Slavs,and non-Ottoman
merchants
weretherefore
allowedto obtain
controlof the foreigntradeof the Empire.Positionsof executive
authority
in themilitary
apparatus
andpolitical
structure,
on theother
to Moslemsand Turks.
hand,werereserved
GreekOrthodoxy
enjoyeda morefavored
position
in theOttoman
becauseofitscompromise
EmpirethanRomanCatholicism
withthe
stateand subjection
in politicalmattersto the will of the state.
waslessfavored
Catholicism
bothbecauseofitspolitical
independence
and becausetheprimary
enemiesof theOttomanEmpirewerelong
the Catholicpowersof Venice and the Germanic-Roman
Empire
(Austria).
In i557, upon the urgingsof the Serbian-born
Vizier Mehmed
Sokolli(Sokolovic),Suleimanthe Magnificent
the Serbian
restored
whichhad ceasedto existfollowing
patriarchate,
theOttomanconquestofSerbiain 1459. A possiblereasonfortherestoration
mayhave
beento obtainthesupport
of theSerbianclergyagainstthegrowth
ofoutlawbandsamongtheSerbs.DuringtheAustro-Turkish
warof
boththehigherand lowerclergyof Serbiain1593-i606, however,
was thereafter
spiredthepeopleto revolt.The Ottomangovernment
oftheSerbian
mistrustful
church.
154 H.H.S.A., St A. Tiirkei V/27, "Conscription
deren allhier in Wien sich befindenden
Tiirkenund tiurkischen
Unterthanen,"
datedFeb. 7, 1767.
155 (Xavier Scrofani),Voyageen Grece de Xavier Scrofani,Sicilien,fait en 1794 et 1795,
trans.fromItalian by J.F. C. Blanvillain,3 vols. (Paris and Strasbourg,i8oi), III, 101.
156 BernardLewis, "The Impact of the FrenchRevolutionon Turkey," Cahiersd'histoire
mondiale;Journalof WorldHistory;Cuadernosde historiamundial,I (I953),
I05.
pp. 30-3I.
294
Traian Stoianovich
of thepietyof Greekmerchants
oftenstrikes
the
The formalism
observers
of Greekand Greco-Vlach
eyeof unsympathetic
religious
To question
theirpiety,
is toformulate
theproblem
practices.
however,
erroneously.
GreekOrthodoxmerchants
did nothave to createtwo
codesof moralbehavior,
one formatters
of faithand the
different
otherformatters
of business.
For theGreekmerchant,
religionwas
businessa matterof religion.Religion,
secular-this-worldly-and
andnationwereone;pietism,
andethnic
business,
secularism,
solidarity
or nationalism
werecoexistent.
It is in thislightthatwe mustunderstandthe unhesitating
readinessof the Greekmerchant
colonyof
as a "legallyconstituted
Triesteto describetheirparishcommunity
159
national-civil
anddomiciliar-administrative
economic
brotherhood."
Fromtoptobottom,
fromthepatriarchate
totheparishcommunity,
theGreekOrthodox
churchwas permeated
withan ethnocentric
and
secularoutlook.The Serbs,essentially
informal
evenwhileobserving
forms,
werealsoethnocentric
in theirreligious
practices.
In viewofthe
of theauthority
of theirchurch,
weakening
however,
theyfailedto
as an
an ideologyof the churchor parishcommunity
formulate
"economicbrotherhood"
and latercombinedsecularism
withagnosthanpietism.
The ethnocentrism,
ticismrather
andpietism
secularism,
of neo-Greek,
and Phanariote
Macedo-Vlach,
Orthodoxy
made the
Greek and Greco-Vlachmerchantfundamentally
and religiously
hencemoreredoubtable
thanthe Serbian
in commerce
materialist,
Serbianmaterialism
merchant.
lackeda religious-economic
basis; it
wasmoreephemeral,
lessfundamental.
The Orthodox
"ethic"promoted
theriseofa merchant
classin one
further
respect.
The enormous
numberoffastdaysin theOrthodox
calendarforcedthefaithful
to practice
frugality
religiously
and thus
accumulate
wealthforfuture
investment,
whentimeswerepropitious,
as during
mostoftheeighteenth
century.
X
The AustrianWar Council observedin i699 that Serbswere
bornandtrained"
Germanmerchants
"naturally
fortrade.'60
couldnot
withtheRascians,
to one complaint,
because"der
compete
according
and strictlaws of fastingand habit,
Raize," bound by necessity
159 Popovic, 0 Cincarima,
pp. 69-71.
160 Kostic, DositejObradovic,
pp. 210-II.
Afterdiscussingthe new commerceof Greek and Albanian merchantsin Morea, Scrofaniobservedthat no nation could equal the
and diligence.'62JoshuaJepson
Greeksin avarice,thrift,
shrewdness,
Oddy, memberof the Russia and Turkeyor Levant companies,observedthatthe whole of the land and sea tradebetweenRussia and
theBalkansor Aegeanwas in thehandsof Greeks,"on accountof the
extraordinary
assiduity,economy,and personal attendanceto their
businesswhich no foreignercan equal. Their assiduityand personal
attendancenever cease, even during the time Constantinopleis in163
fectedbytheplague,whichdriveseveryforeigner
intothecountry."
It is no accidentthat the wealthiestGreek merchantswere often
Greeks in Vienna, Trieste,or Amsterdam,and later Alexandriaor
Marseilles.Both personand propertywere insecurein the Ottoman
like "good money,"fled
Empire,and thusbothpersonand property,
to areas of greatersecurity.'64
"Some branchesof the migrating
families,"however,were"alwaysleftin Turkey,eitherfromnecessity,
from the possessionof propertyin the country,or fromthe convenienceto bothpartiesin a commercialpointof view.Thus," according to theEnglishtravelerDr. Holland, "byfarthegreaterpartof the
exteriortrade of Turkey,in the exchange of commodities,[was]
carriedon by Greek houses,which [had] residentsat home, and
branchesin variouscitiesof Europe,mutuallyaiding each other,extendingtheirconcernsmuch more variouslythan could be done in
Turkeyalone."165
I53,
n. 84.
Traian Stoianovich
296
hadto
orbrokers,
towhichEuropeanmerchants
expensive
middlemen
resort.Religiousand ethnicties,a commonplace of origin,clan
or pohratimstvo
held together
affiliation,
and blood brotherhood
orassociates
whowerenotofthesamebiological
family.
thosepartners
organizedinto
weregenerally
abroad,moreover,
Balkanmerchants
at their
or merchant
guilds,witha "Consul"or "Richter"
companies
headto smoothout discordsand promotethebusinessof theentire
"company."16
won theirwealthby
in foreign
landssometimes
Greekmerchants
banknotes
"arbitrary
and excessive
prices"and discounting
charging
at an "excessive
rate."167 An anonymous
and Turkishsilvercurrency
theGreekswho controlled
theDanuberiver
criticizes
writer
harshly
Vidinand Orsovain thetimeofNapoleon:
tradebetween
withthe Pasha
Everyday the Greeks,and especialythoseof Vidin,conjointly
[Pasvanoglu],make . . . a truemonopolyof thepassageof poorlyladen boats
theircargoesat will, overloading
the
and frequently
spoiledgoods,increasing
boats....
as tax,excise,and customsfarmers,
theirfunctions
Whileexecuting
merchants
by
theywereable to hinderthetradeof rivalor foreign
a portion
ofthebales
openingandappropriating
altering
theircargoes,
tollsor customs.
Through
arbitrary
putin theircharge,and exacting
thecarriers
of
also commonin Belgradeand Svistov,
suchpractices,
168
"inbrevetempo,
miglionari."
Vidinbecame,
and allowanceshould
The sourcesof theseopinionsareunfriendly
are
too
much
to
this
views
in
fact.The
be madefor
accord,however,
and
be ignored.The opinionsof a Frenchconsulon thecommerce
andwithout
be appliedprofitably,
merchants
ofRagusamay,moreover,
to Greeksand otherBalkanmerchants,
thefacts,
as wellas
distorting
169
to Ragusans:
AfoG,CVIII (1920),
270-71
10772,
Reportof Le Maire,French
of theircommerce
The technique
was basedon wile ratherthan
in theeighteenth
science.
Balkanmerchants
triumphed
century
chiefly
in areasrecently
in thecarrying
tradeandprimarily
openedto coloniAs theneighboring
Balkaninterior.
zationorin theprimitive
sparsely
classesweredeareaswerecolonized,as nativemerchant
inhabited
andhabitsofthepeoples
velopedin them,as thegeography,
economy,
becamebetterknownto foreigntraders,
as
of the Balkaninterior
foreign
traders
beganto learnthelanguagesof the Balkanpeoples,
as thevalueof Austrianexportsto the Balkansbeganto approach
the businesspositionof the Balkan
the value of Austrianimports,
was seriously
merchant
injured.
Austrian
merchants
of theeighteenth
century
werealmostalways
to engagein interretailers.
ThoseAustrians
whonursedan ambition
nationaltradewere oftenignorantor prodigaland behavedlike
"cavaliers."
Theylackeda long businesstradition,
rarelyknewthe
Balkanlanguages,
andcouldnotlearnthebusiness
offoreign
tradein
schoolswerelackingin Austriauntilafter
school,sincecommercial
I750. As Greekmerchants
long refusedto divulgetheirbusiness
Austrian
merchants
had to learnbypersonalexperience.
secrets,
They
couldnotobtainthisexperience,
however,
without
establishing
compin theBalkans,
andthislasttheyhad todeferuntil
toirsorwarehouses
afterI770, whenAustrian
becamelargeenoughtowarrant
it.'70
exports
and sometimes
Austrian
firms
Well-capitalized
government-backed
succeededafterI770 in obtainingthe collaboration
of Greekand
oftherighttosupplyLombardy
Macedo-Vlach
merchants.
Thefarmer
thusformed
CountRuggierStarhemberg,
a partnership
withtobacco,
in I776 withEmmanuel
Rizos,a GreekofSalonika.The enterprise
of
in Seres,Larissa,and
Rizosandthebusiness
acumenofGreekfactors
othernear-by
places,assuredthesuccessof thefirmof Starhemberg,
17O Herzfeld, "Zur Orienthandelspolitik,"Af6G, CVIII (ig2o),
264-65.
Trajan Stoianovich
298
whichsupplied
Lombardy
withMacedonian
tobaccoandAustriawith
largequantities
ofMacedonian
andThessalian
cotton
andsilk.'7'
In i777, the Austriangovernment
createdthe Orientalische
Friesische
Handlungs-Compagnie
and gave it the rightto tradein
Serbia,Bosnia,Macedonia,Bulgaria,Wallachia,and Moldavia.The
of Baronvon
company
was initially
placedunderthesole direction
Fries,Daniel Zepharovich,
and NicolausPatsatsi(alias Constantin
Mosca).In shorttime,however,
theGreekor Greco-Vlach
merchants
UruscioKoatza (WrussioCoacza) and AthanasioHatsiGeorgwere
allowedtopurchase
capitalstockandmademanagers
ofthecompany.
The firmplannedto establishits own warehouses
in Zemunor
Pancevo,in Roseor Galati,and in Kilianovaor Ismael(Izmail). At
ithadtorelyon theservices
ofa Greekor Greco-Vlach
first,
however,
forwarding
agentin Zemun,who transshipped
to Viennathecotton
Koatza dispatched
fromSeres.The othercompanymanager,Hatsi
fromtheAustrian
Georg,traveled
to Wallachiawithletters
governon thecomment,requesting
PrinceYpsilanti
to placeno restrictions
to
of wool and callingon him to issuea rescript
pany'spurchases
local Wallachianmagistrates
ordering
themto favorthe commerce
of thecompany.'72
The collaboration
merchants
of Greekand Macedo-Vlach
with
Austrianbusinessenterprises
allowed a few Austriantradersto
copenetrate
theBalkanmarket.
Moreover,
Austro-Greek
commercial
operation
and theAustro-Turkish
tradeagreement
of i784 permitted
a remarkable
ofAustrian
to theBalkans.The ratio,in
growth
exports
moneyvalues,betweenAustrianexportsto and importsfrom
Macedoniaand Thessalythusrosefromi:i6 in I770 to I:3 twenty-
fiveyearslater.173
beneficial
to Balkantraders,
commercial
collaboration
Initially
with
171 Svoronos,
Le commerce
de Salonique,pp. i82-84.
172 H.H.S.A., St A. Tirkei V/26, letterfromHallmayrto di Gamera,ImperialVice-Consul
in Salonika,Nov. 3,
March29,
I779;
1777;
of Julyi,
ibid.,convention
I777,
creatingthe Orientalische
Friesische
300
Traian Stoianovich
revolution
oftheeconomic
thepressures
Forcedtoyieldgroundbefore
in the overland
Greekmerchants
and theobstacleof civildisorder,
ofthepolitical
revolution.
Deep seedsof antitradewerealsovictims
in theSerbianwarsof
forexample,
wereimbedded
Greeksentiment,
and in the laterWallachianuprisingof Tudor
nationalliberation
Greekshad to compete
withthe
Afteri8i5, moreover,
Vladimirescu.
classesof Austriaand Hungary,as well as
new nationalmerchant
convinced
as withtheJews.Finally,theGreekWar of Independence
the Turksof the need to deprivethe Greeks,at leasttemporarily,
statusin the Empire.The forceof naof theirspeciallyprivileged
in Attica,
enabledtheGreeksto createa Greeknation-state
tionalism
andtheAegean;it enabledtheSerbsto carve
Morea(Peloponnesus),
outofthewoodsandwildsofSumadija.
nation-state
a semiautonomous
in central
Europe
alsohurtGreekbusiness
Buttheforceofnationalism
of therelatively
strongSerbianmerand causedthetransformation
and opclassof Hungaryintoa dominated
chantand professional
middleclass.
pressed
XI
The demandof the Balkanpeoplesforthegoodsof Europewas
smallerthanthedemandoftheWestforthegoodsoftheBalkans.A
was thatGreekand otherBalkanmercomplaint
Austrian
constant
"good"
ornomoney
atall andexported
in"bad"money
brought
chants
In view of the low BalkandemandforAustriangoods
money.178
to createa
government
untilafteri770 and thedesireoftheAustrian
alternatives
andimport
thefollowing
merchants,
classofnativeexport
wereopento Balkantradersin Austriaand Hungary:i) to invest
andinthetradeofVienna,
commerce
theirprofits
inlocalandregional
Trieste,Fiume,and Leipzig; 2) to use themto importgoods to
Alexandria,
and other
AustriafromHamburg,London,Marseilles,
ports;3) to remitthemto theirfamilies
EuropeanandMediterranean
in spiteofAustrian
restrictions;
4) to divertthemto philanthropy;"79
and bankers.
and 5) to becomemoneylenders
178 Popovic',0 Cincarima,
p. io5; Herzfeld,"Zur Orienthandelspolitik,"
AfdG,CVIII
252.
(I920),
302
Traz'an Stoianovich
The history
of the Darvarfamilyof the Macedo-Vlach
carrying
theroleofZemunin capitalformation
villageofKleisouraillustrates
merchant
and ofViennain absorbing
capitalintobankingenterprise.
A member
oftheDarvarfamily,
forexample,
wentto Zemunaround
ofKatranitsa.
After
i750-at aboutthesametimeas theSolarfamily
in Zemun,thehouseof Darvarshifted
amassinga smallfortune
its
centerof businessin the I770's to Vienna.In i790, MarkoDarvar
openeda bankin Vienna,theestimated
capitalof whichexceededa
millionflorins
in i800.182
The Sinamerchant
ofMoschopolis
settled
in Sarajevoc. I750,
family
thenwenton to SlavonskiBrod,and finallyestablished
itselfin the
Austriancapital.Simon G. Sina (I753-i822), who was born in
Sarajevoand movedto Viennawithhis parents,
starteda banking
enterprise
of Europeanrenownin the Austriancapitaland became
theforemost
importer
ofcottonand woolfromtheOttomanEmpire
blockadeofNapoleonicFranceand Europe.Three
duringtheBritish
yearsbefore
hisdeath,he wasennobled.
His son,BaronGeorgeS. Sina,
inherited
theaffairs
ofthefamily
bankandobtained
ofa large
control
shareof thewool,cotton,and tobaccoimportand exporttradeof
Austria
andHungary."83
The probabledeclinein thetotalnumberof Greekmerchants
in
central
Europeafteri8oois thusalsotheresultofthegrowth
oflarge
business
andtheconcentration
ofcapitalin thehandsofhighfinance.
The newfinanciers
in Austriawereoftenof Balkanorigin,but,like
the Sina family,developedcosmopolitan
interests
and werepartly
denationalized,
first
bytheiradoptionofa newstyleoflife-thestyle
of a noblessede robe-and finallyby exogamous
marriage,
thatis,
outsideoftheethnicandreligious
marriage
community
oftheoriginal
family.
Greekbankersaroseinitially,
however,
notin Viennabutin Constantinople,
whereafteri700 the Phanariote
Greekschallenged
the
oftheJewsandArmenians.'84
banking
monopoly
In thefinaldecades
of the eighteenth
century,
Greekbankerswereactivein almostall
ofthelargertownsandportsofTurkey.
Ottoman
bankers-Greeks,
as
Macedo-Slavs,and Serbs.An additional134 Ottomanmerchantswho did businessin Vienna
wereabsentfromViennain 1766 but expectedto returnin the near future.Cf. H.H.S.A. St A.
TiirkeiV/27, "Conscriptionderen allhierin Wien sich befindendenTilrken und tiirkischen
Unterthanen,"
Feb. 7, 1776; Enepekides,Griechischc
Handelsgesellschaften,
pp. vi, 42.
182popovic, 0 Cincaima, pp. 124-25,
347.
183 Ibid.,pp. 149-56.
184 Stoianovich,
"L'Vconomiebalkanique,"
pp.199-200, 297.
304
Trazan Stoianovich
306
Trajan Stoianovich
isnota handsome
profit
on
activity
principle
thattheobjectofbusiness
altogether.
The
object
might
frustrate
business
everytransaction;
this
of handsomeprofits
is the realization
of business,
on the contrary,
of extimeand timeagainbyneverallowinga lull in theprocesses
theoperations
of carrier,
mercombining
changeand by knowingly
or banker.The Greekbusinessman
generally
chant,and moneylender
themanufacturing
stagebecauseoftheabsencein theOttobypassed
market.
manEmpireofan adequateinternal
XII
tothefounding
contributed
GreekandSerbianmerchants
financially
of booksin theirrespective
national
of schoolsand dissemination
to the
Theywerealso receptive
languagesamongtheircompatriots.
attitudes
towards
the
idea
of
national
Their
ideasoftheEnlightenment.
One-and perhaps
thelargest
wereambivalent.
however,
independence,
thinkin termsof political
did not originally
-group of merchants
Anothergroupfavoredpoliticalindependence
onlyif
independence.
or entailedonlythe transfer
of
it did not entailsocialrevolution,
thatis,fromtheTurksand
wealthfromone smallgroupto another,
smallbutdialecA thirdgroup,numerically
Moslemsto themselves.
evenat the costof
desirednationalindependence
ticallyimportant,
socialrevolution.
of the Empireand the declineof the
The territorial
contraction
thewealthofMoslem
townsthreatened
purchasing
powerofOttoman
this
To
offset
their
landlords
administrators.
threat,
theyintensified
and
thepeasantry,
initially
allowingnativemertacticsof expropriating
in placingtheproperty
oftheexpropriated
chantstoactas middlemen
Towardtheendoftheeighteenth
market.
peasanton theinternational
theircupidity
gotthebestofthem.Paradingas the
century,
however,
foremost
certain
amongthemPasvanoglu
ofinflation,
chiefs,
opponents
ofthetownsofBulgariaand Bosnia
ofVidin,arousedtheinhabitants
which
policiesof the centralgovernment,'95
againsttheinflationary
to prosperamidthe
allowednew-ruraland semiurban-merchants
miseries
oftheartisanclass.
feudallords,
a coalitionof disgruntled
This seignorialreaction,
195
Olivier,Voyagedans l'Empireottoman,1,204.
308
Traian Stoianovich
authorities
bya Greek
theclub,moreover,
wererevealedto Austrian
Demetrius
Oeconomus
ofTrieste.2"'
merchant,
societyfoundedin
The PhilikeHetairia,a secretrevolutionary
andthecreation
thespreadofGreekculture
Odessain i814 topromote
empire,
conChristian
ofa Greeknationalstateor ofa neo-Byzantine
was profestained452 enrolledmembers
in i8i9. Its membership
6onotables,
as follows:153 merchants
andshippers,
sionally
distributed
or secretaries,
22 teachers
23 officials
36 fighting
men,24 clergymen,
io doctors,
exercising
miscellaneous
4 lawyers,
i6 persons
andstudents,
Ofthemembers
ofunidentified
profession.
professions,
and104 persons
areknown,44 percentweremerchants
or shippers
whoseprofessions
and41 percentweremembers
ofthebureaucracy
andintelligentsia.""
of thePhilikeHetairiaremainedsmalluntilits
The membership
conservative,
thatis, untilafteri8i9. Beforeits
leadership
became
out of severalhundreds
deradicalization
onlyone Greekmerchant
The Greekmerchant
ofthesociety.
who
wasa member
JohnPriggos,
complained
thattheTurkdid not
madehisfortune
in Amsterdam,
realizethat"thewealthofhissubjects
is thewealthofhiskingdom,"
statethatwould
GreekChristian
and yearnedforan independent
ofHydra
honortheprinciple
Buttheleadingmerchant
ofproperty.202
declinedto join the
and laterpoliticalleader,GeorgeKoundouriotes,
Philike Hetairiawithoutwrittenevidencethat the conservative
genius.203
Capodistrias
wasitsdirecting
thenaturallimits
To saymoreonthissubject
wouldbe togo beyond
matter
of thisstudy.If we haveapproached
at
all, it is to draw
the
and comparative
oftheentire
attention
totheneedforcritical
analysis
of treating
the
periodbetween1770 and i830 and to thedesirability
as partsof a greater
Serbianand Greekwarsof nationalliberation
and smoldering
revolts
which
whole,linksin thechainofrevolutions
and LatinAmericain thehalfcentury
firedEurope,Anglo-America,
or moreafteri775. The destinies
of theBalkanmiddleclasseswere
interlocked
withthefortunes
and misfortunes
of themiddleclasses
at no previous
oftheiremergence;
oftheWestfromtheverymoment
timeweretherelations
between
theBalkansandtheWestso intensive
andextensive,
andofthe
however,
as inthetimeoftheEnlightenment
FrenchRevolution.
Ibid.,pp. 132-33.
C W. Crawley,"JohnCapodistriasand the Greeksbefore 821i," CambridgeHistorical
journal,XIII (I957), 179.
202 Stavrianos,
TheBalkans
since1453, p. 145.
23 Crawley,"JohnCapodistrias,"
CambridgeHistoricaljournal,XIII (I957), 179.
200
201
7) the decline of Ottoman urban manufacturesand the abandonment of industrial protectionismat the very moment that westernand central European
stateswere encouragingthe developmentof industry;
8) the colonization of lands without a merchant or middle class: Hungary,
between i690 and i8oo, and South Russia, Crimea, and the Ukraine, between
I750 and i8I5;
perseverance,
9) thebusinesstechniquesof Balkan Orthodoxmerchants:frugality,
wile, acting as middlementhemselvesbut avoiding the servicesof othermiddlemen, runningtheir businessesas familyaffairs,and acceptingthe counsel and
arbitrationof a "consul" or judge of theirown nationalityand religion;
the developmentamong the Greeks of a secular moralityin union with
i0)
ratherthan separatefromor hostileto Orthodoxpietism;and
the reopeningof the Black Sea to non-Ottomanships afterI774.
ii)
Traian Stoianovich
3IO
but theirtradeassumed
were alreadyactivein the sixteenthcentury,
trade
afterthe declineof the continental
moreimportant
proportions
of Ragusa and the migrationof manywealthySerbsfromOld Serbia
and Macedoniato Hungaryand Vojvodina.In theperiodbetween17I8
and 1750, theSerbscaptureda largepartof theHungarianretailtrade
and partof the overlandforeigntradebetweenTurkeyand the Pannonian basin. Bulgarianmerchantsbegan to engage in international
tradeafteri750 but did not achieveprominenceuntilafterthe treaty
(i829).
ofAdrianople
312
Trajan Stoianovich
ofrights
totheprotection
oftheRussian,
orHabsburg
Ottoman,
states,
or ofother,
notnecessarily
politically
sovereign,
protection-producing
enterprises.
Balkanmerchants
thefollowing
passedthrough
stagesofprofessional
orsailors,
orpiracy
affiliation:
i) muleteers,
peddlers,
withbrigandage
as a sideline;2) commission
withmoneylending
agentsorforwarders,
as a sideline;3) independent
and
merchants;
withpolitics
4) bankers,
political
administration
as a sideline;and5) statesmen,
withbusiness
as a sideline.At theendoftheseventeenth
almostall Balkan
century,
Orthodox
merchants
fellintothefirst
at theendofthe
twocategories;
thereweremanyin thethirdand fourthand evenfifth
eighteenth,
categories.
The functions
of Greekmerchants
in Mediterranean
and world
tradecontinued
to growafteri8oo,but theroleof Greeks,Vlachs,
and Serbsin thecontinental
traderemainedmoreor less stableor
declined.
This declineis attributable
to thespreadof brigandage,
the
adventoftheIndustrial
Revolution
in western
andcentral
Europe,the
of theBalkantradein thehandsof fewerand more
concentration
Balkanmerchants,
powerful
andtherivalry
ofnewnationally
conscious
Greektradestagnated
bourgeoisies.
or shrankonlyon thecontinental
front,
whileitrecovered
intheOttoman
Empireitself
after
a temporary
eclipseduringtheWar ofGreekIndependence
in the
and prospered
Mediterranean.
Serbian
ontheotherhand,declined
trade,
on all fronts.
AftertheSerbianwarsofnationalliberation,
theTurksidentified
the
nameof"Serb"withtheactofrebellion
and ceasedto favorSerbian
commerce.
At thesametime,Austria
and Hungaryprotected
Magyar,
German,and Jewish
theGermanization
and
merchants,
encouraged
oftheSerbian
middleclass,and,failing
Magyarization
in this,deprived
manySerbsof openingsin commerce,
publicadministration,
and
theliberalprofessions.
Disgruntled
by the personaland politicalinsecurity
in Turkey,
Greekand Serbianmerchants
closedrankstemporarily
with the
andfurnished
peasantry
theleadership
oftheSerbian(i804-i815) and
Greek(i82i-i829) warsofnationalliberation.
Byand large,however,
bothGreekand Serbianmerchants
favored
onlylimitedsocialrevolution.Theydesiredto transfer
fromtheTurksand Moslems
property
to themselves
and,afterthat,toestablish
existing
property
on a secure
basis,thatis, to prevent
the loss and acquisition
of property
except
in accordance
withlawsdetermined
in theinterest
oftheirownclass.
The merchant
classwas sociallyrevolutionary
in one otherrespect:
it