Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
REVIEW
Department of Veterans Affairs, Jesse Brown VA Hospital, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine,
University of Illinois, Chicago, and 2Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida, USA
ABSTRACT
Opioids are widely used for their analgesic properties
for the management of acute and chronic pain related
to a variety of illnesses. Opioid usage is associated with
adverse effects on respiration which are often attributed to depression of the central nervous system.
Recent data indicate that opioid use has increased over
the last two decades. There is also increasing evidence
that opioids have a variety of effects on the lungs
besides suppression of respiration. Opioids can affect
immune cells function, increase histamine release
causing bronchospasm, vaso-constriction and hypersensitivity reactions. Together, these actions have a
variety of effects on lung function. Here, we provide a
comprehensive review of the effects of opioids on the
lungs including the respiratory centre, immune function, airways and pulmonary vasculature.
Key words: clinical allergy and immunology, clinical respiratory medicine, critical care medicine, molecular biology.
Abbreviations: NCPE, non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
INTRODUCTION
Control of pain has a central role in the treatment of
patients with advanced cancer or other terminal illnesses and in acute postsurgical or chronic nonmalignant diseases. Opioids are among the most
commonly administered drugs in hospitals for pain
management. The legal use of narcotics also includes
patients who are recovering from drug addiction
which mainly constitutes the use of methadone. Illicit
use of opioids is reported in 12% of patients in developed countries, and opioid abuse is a significant contributor to mortality. Morphine is the prototype
opioid analgesic; and for more than two decades, oral
256
input from cranial and spinal nerves. Both central
and peripheral pathways provide feedback into these
areas affecting respiration. There may also be some
limited influence by the cortex and baroreceptors.2,3
Mu (m), delta (d) and kappa (k) opioid receptors have
all been identified in these regions and react to both
endogenous and exogenous agonists and affect respiratory drive.
Stimulation of both m and d receptors in rat brainstems causes respiratory slowing and arrest.2 There
are at least three general classes of endogenous
opiates: b-endorphins, enkephalins and dynorphins.
These, along with exogenous opiates, act via different
receptors and with different effect depending on type,
receptor affinity and species. The effect of opioids on
respiration is multifaceted and affects tidal volume,
rate, mainly through prolongation of expiratory time
and response to other stimuli.4
Stimuli such as pain and hypoxemia increase respiratory drive, and this effect is blunted by stimulation
of the m or d receptors.1 A study of rat respiration
showed that administration of fentanyl or dermorphin (endogenous opioid peptide) both caused
decreased respiration. Co-administration of naloxonazine (m1 receptor antagonist) blocked the depressive effect of fentanyl (affinity for m1 >>> m2) but not
that of dermorphin (affinity for m1 ~ m2).5 While opioid
receptors are also found throughout the pulmonary
system, respiratory drive appears to be centrally controlled..6 Studies in dogs showed that b-endorphin
injected into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) resulted in a
significant decrease in respiratory rate, tidal volume
and inspiratory pressure that was completely
reversed when naloxone was given. The increase in
CO2 which resulted from slowing of respiration also
decreased with naloxone administration.7 Studies in
rats showed cessation of phrenic nerve output
with systemic morphine injection and correlated with
apnoea observed. These effects were reversible with
naloxone. In rats in which vagal nerves were not
transected, a period of increased respiratory frequency was noted followed by a brief apnoeic period.
This may have been due to a reflexive morphine effect
on J-fibers.8 This effect of J-fibre stimulation and the
concurrent opioid-induced respiratory depression
has also been demonstrated in humans.9
While the effect of exogenous opioids has been
clear, the role of endogenous opioids on respiration is
less obvious. Willer demonstrated that intravenous
naloxone had no effect on healthy subjects respiration (Tidal volume, inspiratory and expiratory time,
Partial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) ) when compared to placebo.10 A randomized placebo-controlled trial assessing naloxones effects compared to placebo in
patients with chronic obstructive airways diseases
(COPD) showed that while naloxone administration
increased resting tidal volume, no other significant
differences were observed.11 A study by Mahler et al.
also showed similar findings in patients with COPD,
although there was a statistically significant increase
in breathlessness with naloxone administration.12
Human studies have also demonstrated that administration of morphine can lead to a decrease in tidal
volume and inspiratory pressure. This effect was
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
257
haemodynamics may also influence the pathogenesis
of oedema.
Recent data suggest that an NCPE has an incidence
of 110%, lower than previous estimate. 29 NCPE is
quick in onset and does not extend beyond 2 h.30
While overdosing with heroin occurs more often in
long-time users, one retrospective review showed that
less experienced users were more likely to present
with NCPE.29
While heroin appears to be the most studied, legal
opiates used in a more controlled setting have also
been implicated in NCPE. One patient following
laparotomy developed bilateral pulmonary oedema
twice during the same admission to the ICU, both
times resolving with switch from morphine to other
analgesics.31 Besides morphine, oral opioids
including methadone and codeine may also cause
oedema.32,33 Flack et al. reported a patient developing
symptoms when naloxone was administered to
reverse the effects of morphine in the setting of heart
failure post-mitral valve replacement and coronary
artery bypass. It was thought to be related to a massive
sympathetic response making cardiogenic oedema a
confounding diagnosis.34 Raijmakers reported a case
of acute pulmonary oedema in a patient after using
cocaine and heroin. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, oncotic pressure and capillary permeability
(measured via gadolinium) were all reported as
normal. While the cause was not established, the
authors suggest that an impairment of sodium channels in alveoli by cocaine contributed to the prolonged course compared to other studies.35 Another
case was that of a woman with codeine abuse who
presented with altered mental status and was found
to be in hypercapnic respiratory failure. With administration of a single dose of naloxone she quickly
developed tachypnoea, tachycardia and diffuse bilateral rales. She was treated with furosemide, nitroglycerin and morphine with rapid improvement of
symptoms.36 Although these reports suggest an association, the mechanism by which naloxone induces
pulmonary oedema is not fully understood.
The development of pulmonary oedema is the
result of imbalance between hydrostatic and oncotic
pressure resulting in net positive pressure out of the
capillaries, an increase in capillary permeability or a
combination of both. Numerous small studies have
looked at the makeup of fluid from pulmonary
oedema to try to better define the mechanism for the
formation of the fluid. The protein content of pulmonary oedema fluid was 85% that of plasma. This is
much higher than that of approximately 50% in
oedema fluid due to cardiac causes.25 Frand noted
that the oedema fluid in case of methadone overdose
was similar in composition to that of plasma.32
Further evidence that opioid-induced fluid formation
is a distinct entity from cardiogenic pulmonary
oedema was shown in a case series comparing 24
patients with documented pulmonary oedema.
Patients with oedema secondary to heroin or phenobarbital overdose showed an average fluid protein
to serum protein ratio of 0.85 compared to 0.46 in
cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.37 These findings
were further supported by Carlson in a study of 37
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
258
patients with pulmonary oedema.38 While most of the
data support an increase capillary permeability as a
cause of NCPE, it has also been suggested that opioids
produce oedema by mechanisms which are probably
related to endothelial dysfunction.27
More recent research has given additional insights
into the possible mechanism of endothelial dysfunction which may lead to pulmonary oedema by
opioids. In vitro, morphine alters the viability of
vascular endothelial cells in a dose and timedependent manner. Nitric oxide concentration and
the production of reactive oxygen species were
increased with morphine compared to control solution. Both these effects were reversed by treatment
with naloxone. Furthermore, addition of a nitric
oxide synthase inhibitor prevented morphineinduced apoptosis of endothelial cells.39 This study
demonstrated that morphine not only could affect
cell death in vascular endothelium but also suggests
a possible mechanism for morphine-induced endothelial dysfunction by production of reactive oxide
species. This was supported further by others in
experimental models. Lam et al. showed that morphine induced the production of reactive oxygen
species in a dose and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, following exposure to morphine for 14
days compared to placebo, aortic endothelium
showed an increase in superoxide anions along with
decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation by
acetylcholine. This impaired relaxation was normalized by addition of superoxide scavengers indicating
a more direct role for reactive oxide species in
morphine-induced endothelial dysfunction.40 These
experiments suggest that there may be a complex
interplay of morphine with endothelial cells. Liu
et al. studied the effects of morphine on endothelial
permeability in conjunction with Lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Compared to LPS alone, LPS plus morphine led to a statistically significant increase in
vascular permeability, decrease in cell viability and
cellular apoptosis.41 Together, these data indicate
that the increased vascular permeability and endothelial dysfunction both play a role in opiate induced
pulmonary oedema. However, some features of the
opiate related NCPE, particularly the rapid resolution and evidence of haemodynamic changes
suggest that increased hydrostatic pressure may also
play a role.27 It should be noted that morphineinduced pulmonary oedema is rare when used
within therapeutic range, and narcotics continue to
remain a drug of choice along with diuretics for the
treatment of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
Acute lung injury, as a complication of noncardiogenic pulmonary oedema, has been reported in
cases of opioid overdose, mostly heroin although
there are a few anecdotal reports with other opioid
use. While the exact mechanism for this phenomenon remains unknown, it is thought to result from
a combination of hypoxic alveolar damage and
negative-pressure barotraumas.42 Cases of diffuse
alveolar haemorrhage have been reported with
opioid intoxication.43 Pulmonary haemorrhage
induced by opioids may be a result of neurogenic
pulmonary oedema or negative pressure pulmonary
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
259
morphine suppresses NF-kB in resident lung cells
which in turn modulates the transcription of Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 and TNF-a.69
These authors have further demonstrated that morphine decreases bacterial clearance by resident alveolar macrophages and impairs pneumococci-induced
Toll-like receptor (TLR)9-NF-kB signalling.70 Thus,
this leads to a decreased innate immune response at
an early stage of infection before the entry of circulating inflammatory cells. Together, these data suggest
that morphine can suppress the basic immune function of neutrophils and macrophages that are pivotal
for the bacterial clearance and host defence.
The immunosuppressive effects of morphine have
also been investigated on adaptive immune cells.
In vivo studies in animal models have demonstrated
that morphine administration reduces the number of
B lymphocytes in the spleen and peritoneal cavity.7173
Freier et al. showed that mice with a surgical implantation of time-released morphine pellet, demonstrated a rapid loss in the cellularity of the spleen and
thymus.74 These investigators have also shown that
morphine inhibits the function of natural killer cells.75
Using fragment cultures of ileal segments, Peng et al.
showed that morphine inhibits mucosal antibody
responses and TGF-b messenger ribonucleic acid
(mRNA) in the gut lymphoid tissue. Morphine
resulted in a highly significant inhibition of cholera
toxin specific IgA and IgG production in fragment
culture supernatants.76 In normal rats, CoussonsRead et al. showed that the activity of resident pulmonary lymphocytes and natural killer cells is inhibited
by morphine in vivo even in the absence of infection.77 In a recent study, Zhang et al. studied the effect
of chronic in vivo morphine administration on lymphoid subsets in various organs and bone marrow.
Their studies provide further evidence that morphine
decreases B cell and macrophage populations in
spleens and induced thymic atrophy. This study also
provides an in-depth analysis of how subset of lymphoid cells are altered by morphine administration.
Their results show that immature B cells were
depleted in spleen and bone marrow, while CD34+ B
cell precursors were not affected in bone marrow and
that recovery of splenic cellularity occurred via proliferation of bone marrow precursors.78 Detailed
analysis of cells in different stages of maturation in
the thymus also identified the T cell subsets that contribute to repopulation of the organ post-morphine
administration. These studies demonstrate the effects
of chronic morphine administration on adaptive
immunity and implicating these with an increased
preponderance to chronic infections or progression
of existing infection.
Opioid addicts in general are more susceptible to
mycobacterial infections and can show anergy
towards tuberculin test thus masking the diagnosis
of tuberculosis. 79,80 In a mouse model of tuberculosis,
Singh et al. showed that morphine exhibited a dosedependent effect. In low doses it had an immunostimulatory effect, however at higher doses, morphine
inhibited macrophage iNOS and NO production which are critical for immune response to
M. tuberculosis.81
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
260
Evidence is also accumulating that high levels of
opioids in circulation in humans can accelerate viral
infections. There is a strong relationship between the
use of opioids, especially morphine, and HIV-1
infection/replication, disease progression and HIV-1
neuropathogenesis. Ronald et al. showed that high
levels of opioids in the circulation of HIV-1-infected
patients can impact disease progression. In fact,
slower disease progression was noted in an HIV-1infected cohort when drug use was disrupted.82
In vitro studies involving cells of the central nervous
system, like those involving cells of the immune
system, have shown increased HIV-1 replication when
treated with opioids.83,84 Studies have also investigated
the impact of opioids on neuropathogenesis of
viral infections and showed an increase in opioidmediated virus production that can further enhance
the neurotoxic effects of HIV-1. This further exacerbates the secretion of by-products and viral proteins
from microglia and astrocytes that lead to secondary
destabilization of neurons, ultimately leading to neuronal injury or death. In addition to viral proteins, the
levels of other potentially toxic products such as
proinflammatory cytokines, glutamate, arachidonic
acid, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide that are
elevated during HIV-1 infection of the brain can also
be modulated by opioids.85 Together, these studies
demonstrate that opioids clearly have the capacity to
exert immunomodulatory activity and highlight the
fact that chronic use of morphine can be associated
with significant immunosuppression with an increase
in infections by mechanisms other than direct respiratory depression.
In conclusion, opioids are among the most commonly prescribed and frequently abused drugs. The
pharmacological and physiological actions of opioids
have been extensively studied both in vitro and
in vivo leading to a better understanding of the opioid
effects on the lungs. It is now recognized that chronic
use of opioids can affect lung function beyond respiratory depression. Opioids can affect the function of
immune cells, increase the release of histamine
causing bronchospasm, vaso-constriction and hypersensitivity reactions. The prolonged use of opiates is
associated with depression of the central nervous
system leading to suppression of respiration particularly in elderly patients, individuals with obesity
hypoventilation and those with sleep apnoea. Thus,
caution should be exerted while using these drugs in
patients with lung disease, central and obstructive
sleep apnoea, chronic obstructive airways disease,
elderly patients and in those patients who are
immunocompromised.
REFERENCES
1 Dubose RA, Berde C. Respiratory Effects of Opioids. International
Association for the Study of Pain Newsletter, Seattle, WA, 1997.
2 Lalley P. Opioidergic and Dopaminergic modulation of respiration. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2008; 164: 1607.
3 Yeadon M, Kitchen I. Opioids and respiration. Prog. Neurobiol.
1989; 33: 116.
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
261
53 Belvisi MG, Stretton CD, Verleden GM et al. Inhibition of cholinergic neurotransmission in human airways by opioids. J. Appl.
Physiol. 1992; 72: 1096100.
54 Corboz M, Rivelli M, Egan R et al. Nociceptin inhibits capsaicininduced bronchoconstriction in isolated guinea pig lung. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 2000; 402: 1719.
55 DAgostino B, Orlotti D, Calo G et al. Nociceptin modulates
bronchoconstriction induced by sensory nerve activation in
mouse lung. Am. J Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010; 42: 2504.
56 Fuller R, Karlsson JA, Choudry N et al. Effect of inhaled and systemic opiates on responses to inhaled capsaicin in humans. J.
Appl. Physiol. 1988; 65: 112539.
57 Bellofiore S, Di Maria U, Privitera S et al. Endogenous opioids
modulate the increase in ventilatory output and dyspnea during
severe acute bronchocontriction. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990; 142:
81216.
58 Beauford W, Saylor TT, Stansburry DW et al. Effects of nebulized
morphine sulfate on the exercise tolerance of the ventilatory
limited COPD patient. Chest 1993; 104: 1758.
59 Chang M, Fan S, Hsiao P et al. Influence of morphine on host
immunity. Acta Anaesthesiol. Taiwan. 2011; 49: 1058.
60 Singhal PC, Sharma P, Kapasi AA et al. Morphine enhances macrophage apoptosis. J. Immunol. 1998; 160: 188693.
61 Frenklakh L, Bhat R, Bhaskaran M et al. Morphine-induced degradation of the host defense barrier role of intestinal mucosal
injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006; 51: 31825.
62 Welters ID, Menzebach A, Goumon Y et al. Morphine suppresses
complement receptor expression, phagocytosis, and respiratory
burst in neutrophils by a nitric oxide and mu(3) opiate receptordependent mechanism. J. Neuroimmunol. 2000; 111: 13945.
63 Bosshart H. Morphine-mediated suppression of phagocytosis.
Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010; 10: 2645.
64 Tomassini N, Renaud F, Roy S et al. Mu and delta receptors
mediate morphine effects on phagocytosis by murine peritoneal
macrophages. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003; 136: 916.
65 Delgado-Vlez M, Lugo-Chinchilla A, Lizardo L et al. Chronic
exposure of human macrophages in vitro to morphine and
methadone induces a putative tolerant/dependent state. J. Neuroimmunology 2008; 196: 94100.
66 Limiroli E, Gaspani L, Panerai AE et al. Differential morphine
tolerance development in the modulation of macrophage cytokine production in mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002; 72: 438.
67 Wang J, Barke RA, Charboneau R et al. Morphine induces defects
in early response of alveolar macrophages to streptococcus
pneumoniae by modulating TLR9-NF-kappa B signaling. J.
Immunol. 2008; 180: 3594600.
68 Madera-Salcedo IK, Cruz S, Gonzalez-Espinosa C. Morphine
decreases early peritoneal innate immunity responses in SwissWebster and C57BL6/J mice through the inhibition of mast cell
TNF-a release. J. Neuroimmunol. 2011; 232: 1017.
69 Wang J, Barke R, Charboneau R et al. Morphine impairs host
innate immune response and increases susceptibility to Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection. J. Immunol. 2005; 174: 426
34.
70 Wang J, Ma J, Charboneau R et al. Morphine inhibits murine
dendritic cell IL-23 production by modulating Toll-like receptor
2 and Nod2 signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011; 286: 102532.
71 Hilburger ME, Adler M, Rogers TJ et al. Morphine alters macrophage and lymphocyte populations in the spleen and peritoneal cavity. J. Neuroimmunol. 1997; 80: 10614.
72 Eisenstein TK, Hilburger M. Opioid modulation of immune
responses: effects on phagocyte and lymphoid cell populations.
J. Neuroimmunol. 1998; 83: 3644.
73 Lysle DT, Coussons M, Watts VJ et al. Morphine-induced alterations of immune status: dose dependency, compartment specificity and antagonism by naltrexone. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
1993; 265: 10718.
74 Freier DO, Fuchs B. Morphine-induced alterations in thymocyte
subpopulations of B6C3F1 mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1993;
265: 818.
Respirology (2013) 18, 255262
262
75 Freier DO, Fuchs BA. A mechanism of action for morphineinduced
immunosuppression:
corticosterone
mediates
morphine-induced suppression of natural killer cell activity.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994; 270: 112733.
76 Peng X, Cebra J, Adler M et al. Morphine inhibits mucosal antibody responses and TGF-beta mRNA in gut-associated lymphoid tissue following oral cholera toxin in mice. J. Immunol.
2001; 167: 367781.
77 Coussons-Read M, Giese S. Acute morphine treatment alters cellular immune function in the lungs of healthy rats. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001; 1: 157181.
78 Zhang EY, Xiong J, Parker BL et al. Depletion and recovery
of lymphoid subsets following morphine administration. Br.
J. Pharmacol. 2011; 164: 182944.
79 Durante AJ, Selwyn P, OConnor PG. Risk factors for and knowledge of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among drug users
in substance abuse treatment. Addiction 1998; 93: 1393401.
80 MacGregor RR, Dunbar D, Graziani AL. Tuberculin reactions
among attendees at a methadone clinic: relation to infection
81
82
83
84
85
Copyright of Respirology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to
multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.