SUPPLIER PART-PROCESS AUDIT FORM

Subject

1. Customer
Grievances

2. Engineering
specifications
change:(ESC)

3.Tool PM Plan

Goal

Score

all point cover which is raised in

audit (supplier audit report)

yes, ECN procedure available

yes

3.1. Is there a written PM plan for 0 - No Evidence

machines, dies and perishable
1 - Inadequate
tools? And is it done accordingly? 3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

PM plan,break down & tool

history card available

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

fully documented

1.1. Have supplier effectively

cloesed the last customer audit
observations and its following
effectively ?
Are prints current to the
2.1. Is there a written process
customer rev level? Are
defining how customer revision
customer changes effectively changes are communicated to
communicated?
production?
2.2. Trace one recent customer
change which should have been
communicated to the production
line. it has been implemented on
the line?

3.2. Is there documentation or

other evidence that it is being
followed?
4.1. How closely can nonHow effective is the
supplier's traceability of non- conforming material to be traced?
conforming product they
have despatch to EIL?
4.2. Is there an specific controlled
Does the supplier effective
area is define in which nonmanage non-conforming
conforming material is
material?
quarantined?
4. Non-conforming
Product
4.3. Is there Customer complaint
reqister and its Corrective &
preventive actions effectiveness
monitoring ?

5. Metrics

4.4. Is there a written process for

communicating the nonconformance to the sub-supplier?
5.1 How many metrics are
Does the supplier effectively monitored for performance like
inhouse rejection PPM,customer
use Metrics to improve
rejection PPM.,Mc. Brake down
performance?
hrs trend & its action plans
6.1 Review the incoming
Does the receiving
inspection process for two parts
inspection area have the
going to the line & they
equipment needed to
Are critical, major key
properly evaluate incoming
characteristics inspected?
product? Is this equipment
calibrated?

6.Receipt
inspection

FM-06-02
OBSERVATIONS/
EVIDENCE (Mandatory for
"Excellent" or "No Evidence"
Ratings)

Criteria /
Suggested Evidence

Previous Audit staus

Is there an effective tool

change / PM schedule in
place?

RATING
0 -No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

6.2. Are the appropriate gauging

tools available?

6.3. Is the calibration of that

equipment current?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes, seprate area define for

rejection

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes, customer complaint

register available & CAPA
effectively monitor

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes , available

available

Is the control plan being

followed completely?

7.1 Follow one Elofic or similar

product through the entire process
from receiving to despatch. Is the
control plan being followed
completely?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

Are setup procedures

effective?

7.2. Is there a setup procedure to

evaluate first piece approval
before start the production and
then process inspection being
done effectively?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

7. Process Control
/ Control Plan :

Page 1 of 6

yes , set up approval

available

SUPPLIER PART-PROCESS AUDIT FORM

Subject

Goal

Criteria /
Suggested Evidence
7.3. Is gauging being followed as
per the control plan at the correct
frequencies? Is it effective?

Do work instructions match 4.1. How closely can nonthe control plan?
conforming material to be traced?
Do work instructions contain
enough information to allow
7. Process Control the operator.
/ Control Plan :

8. Critical
Processes

9.Error Proofing

Are gauging procedures

effective?

10.Gauging:

Is cleanliness and
housekeeping appropriate
for a manufacturing place?
11. Cleanliness /
Housekeeping /
Lighting

12.Safety

13 .Production
Capacity

Is packaging adequate?
15. Packaging

7.6. Are the pass / fail guidelines

display on the work station?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

we have control it through

validation & monitoring

9.1 Is error proofing well thought

out and effective? Try to create or
pass a bad part through the line.
And see its effectiveness.

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

10.1. Are measuring instruments

calibration plan available?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
10.2. As per calibration plan this
0 - No Evidence
have done.
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
10.3. Are operators using the
1 - Inadequate
gauges and instruments properly? 3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
11.1. Is the cleanliness of the
0 - No Evidence
work area satisfactory and
1 - Inadequate
appropriate for the type of product 3 - Adequate
& production process?
5 - Excellent

yes, available

yes available

yes done

yes

yes all area is clean

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes proper lighting

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

13.1 Can the supplier show a plan 0 - No Evidence

to meet our production
1 - Inadequate
requirements?
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes daily production plan &

report are available

14.1 How Supplier to ensure the

0 - No Evidence
Raw materials are uesed & correct 1 - Inadequate
sufficient?
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

yes test cerificate is

available

yes

12.1. Are safety glasses and other

Are safety practices
personal protective equipment
appropriate for a
being worn where appropriate?
manufacturing environment?

14. Material
Certifications

Score

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

11.2. Is lighting satisfactory?

Is production capacity
sufficient to meet Elofic
needs?

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

OBSERVATIONS/
EVIDENCE (Mandatory for
"Excellent" or "No Evidence"
Ratings)

7.5. Are they readily available to

the operator?

Are critical process variables 8.1. Is there critical processes

established, understood, and listed and they justify why these
are critical?
used effectively in
production?
8.2. How the control of critical
processes.

Is error proofing being used

and is there a process in
place to validate the
effectiveness?

FM-06-02

RATING
0 -No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent
0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

15.1 Does supplier is using

standard packing as desired by
Elofic.

0 - No Evidence
1 - Inadequate
3 - Adequate
5 - Excellent

155
Page 2 of 6

ELOFIC SUPPLIER QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FORM
Part Number / Description:

Supplier Name/Location:

Criteria
Number

Score

Non-Conformity / Observation

Corrective Action

Date:
Evidences

Target
Date

Status

Comments