Contour Plot of temperature vs blood pressure, heart beat

Contour Plot
temperature
< 35
35
40
40
45
45
50
> 50

119.0

blood pressure

117.5
116.0
114.5
113.0
111.5
110.0
60

62

64
66
heart beat

68

70

Surface Plot of temperature vs blood pressure, heart beat

Surface Plot

50
temperature

45
40

120

35
115
60

65
heart beat

70

110

blood pressure

Table of Data
Temperature

Heartbeat

Blood Pressure

37

60

110

37

62

111

34

68

115

33

69

117

35

65

114

34

67

116

34

66

114

36

64

112

36

63

113

33

70

120

Graph 1(Scattered)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0

4
Temperature

6
Heartbeat

8
Blood Pressure

10

12

Graph 2(3D line)

150
100
50
0
1

Series3

Series1

Series2

Series1

10

Series3

Graph 3(Linear line)

140
120
y = 0.497x + 111.47

100
80
60

y = 0.4242x + 63.067

40
20

y = -0.1879x + 35.933

0
0

10

Temperature

Heartbeat

Blood Pressure

Linear (Temperature)

Linear (Heartbeat)

Linear (Blood Pressure)

12

Analysis
Regression Equation
temperature

67.5546 - 0.422269 heart beat - 0.0441176 blood pressure

Coefficients
Term
Constant
heart beat
blood pressure

Coef
67.5546
-0.4223
-0.0441

SE Coef
8.80954
0.13627
0.14682

T
7.66835
-3.09876
-0.30049

P
0.000
0.017
0.773

Summary of Model
S = 0.421510
PRESS = 3.16263

R-Sq = 94.05%
R-Sq(pred) = 84.87%

R-Sq(adj) = 92.35%

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
heart beat
blood pressure
Error
Total

DF
2
1
1
7
9

Seq SS
19.6563
19.6403
0.0160
1.2437
20.9000

Adj SS
19.6563
1.7061
0.0160
1.2437

Adj MS
9.82815
1.70605
0.01604
0.17767

F
55.3166
9.6023
0.0903

P
0.000051
0.017352
0.772531

Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

No unusual observations

One-way ANOVA: heart beat, blood pressure

Source
Factor
Error
Total

DF
1
18
19

S = 3.091

SS
11907.20
172.00
12079.20

MS
11907.20
9.56

R-Sq = 98.58%

Level
heart beat
blood pressure

N
10
10

Pooled StDev = 3.09

Mean
65.40
114.20

F
1246.10

P
0.000

R-Sq(adj) = 98.50%

StDev
3.20
2.97

Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev
--------+---------+---------+---------+(-*)
(*-)
--------+---------+---------+---------+75
90
105
120

Response Surface Regression: temperature versus heart beat, blood pressure

The analysis was done using coded units.
Estimated Regression Coefficients for temperature
Term
Constant
heart beat
blood pressure
heart beat*heart beat
blood pressure*blood pressure
heart beat*blood pressure
S = 0.433131
R-Sq = 96.41%

Coef
35.004
-3.180
1.076
2.064
4.572
-6.492

PRESS = 21.8953
R-Sq(pred) = 0.00%

SE Coef
0.4400
2.5908
2.6373
4.1405
4.7483
8.9504

T
79.554
-1.228
0.408
0.498
0.963
-0.725

P
0.000
0.287
0.704
0.644
0.390
0.508

R-Sq(adj) = 91.92%

Analysis of Variance for temperature

Source
Regression
Linear
heart beat
blood pressure
Square
heart beat*heart beat
blood pressure*blood pressure
Interaction
heart beat*blood pressure
Residual Error
Total

DF
5
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
9

Seq SS
20.1496
19.6563
19.6403
0.0160
0.3946
0.0002
0.3944
0.0987
0.0987
0.7504
20.9000

Adj SS
20.1496
10.4480
0.2827
0.0312
0.4567
0.0466
0.1739
0.0987
0.0987
0.7504

Adj MS
4.02992
5.22399
0.28273
0.03125
0.22834
0.04661
0.17391
0.09871
0.09871
0.18760

F
21.48
27.85
1.51
0.17
1.22
0.25
0.93
0.53
0.53

P
0.005
0.004
0.287
0.704
0.386
0.644
0.390
0.508
0.508

Estimated Regression Coefficients for temperature using data in uncoded units

Term
Constant
heart beat
blood pressure
heart beat*heart beat
blood pressure*blood pressure
heart beat*blood pressure

Coef
877.593
18.4971
-24.9643
0.0825559
0.182870
-0.259700

Comments
Based on the data obtained from the analysis, it is found that the R2 value is equal to 98.58%. The R2
value is very high which implies that the data points fall closely to the fitted regression line. In this model,
the percentage of deviation of the data is relatively low due to high R2 value obtained. Almost all the
variability of the data around its mean is explained. The prediction for the data is quite accurate.

Conclusion
Data analysis can be done on the response data using regression analysis to obtain its R2 in order to
identify whether the data points fall closely to the fitted regression line or not. In this model, the R2
calculated is 98.58% which is considerably high. Thus, the prediction for the data is quite accurate.