Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
says that the mathematics is widely available in other works. The book is, therefore, of use
to the nonengineer, to the manager as well, and Wellington distinguishes the material
appropriate to the different classes of readers.
He thoroughly appreciated the outstanding importance of rail stiffness, and made it very
clear why the use of light rail was a false economy. He pointed out that one was not buying
steel, but "stiffness, strength, and durability," and that when rail was priced on the basis of
stiffness, the superiority of heavy rail was evident. This principle is as valid today as it was
when Wellington demonstrated it. He shows that narrow gauge had no economic
advantages, in fact much the reverse, and that standard gauge was practical with the same
grades and curvature. The fact was becoming apparent at the time, he notes.
The book is dedicated: "To the great men of a former generation, who orginated the
American railway system, this attempt to improve on their practice is admiringly inscribed,
in token of respect for their far-sighted sagacity and still unequaled skill." Among these
men, he mentions Latrobe (Baltimore and Ohio), Jervis (Mohawk and Hudson, and many
more, including the Rock Island), Thomson (Pennsylvania Railroad), and Whistler
(Western RR of Mass, and many more). Any student of railway engineering history who is
acquainted with the accomplishments of these men will second the praise. After these men,
the art of railway location practiced in the midwest did indeed fall to a low standard, of
which Wellington provides many examples.
Wellington also said that it was not just the question of how to do something, but of
whether to do it at all. He made it clear that the cost of any improvement must be measured
against the possible returns, and the important thing was to compare alternatives, not
simply to consider a single problem in isolation. These principles have become the basis of
engineering economics, it will be noted.
Most route engineering books consider curves and grades as major topics, in fact the central
topics of their presentation. Wellington, to bring out a very important point, calls them
"Minor Details of Alignment" to shock the traditional engineer. He then points out that he
calls them minor because there are the greater questions of route and ruling gradient to be
decided before they are considered, and no excellence in the details can ever overcome
poor choices in the greater matters. In modern terms, this is recognized as one of the
benefits of "top-down" design. The false economies of long tangents, or of expense to limit
rise and fall, or of building light bridges, are analyzed and clearly demonstrated.
The engineering student, practicing engineer, engineering historian, or railway enthusiast
will all find much of interest and value in Wellington, and will come to know what a real
engineer is like, and how he thinks. The age of this book does not detract from its
importance: it is a classic.