Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The effect of different temperature of homogeneous mixture consisting of distilled water and
Agaricus bisporus on enzyme activity.
The effect of different temperature of homogeneous mixture consisting of distilled water and
Agaricus bisporus on enzyme activity?
Research question:
What is the effect of different temperature of homogeneous mixture consisting of
distilled water and Agaricus bisporus on enzyme activity?
Background information:
Enzymes are globular proteins, which speed up reaction without being changed
themselves. Without them, the reactions would be very slowly and nothing would control the
reactions. Enzymes are nearly always proteins, though they may contain non-protein
component.1 The main properties of enzymes are:
Work rapidly.
Speed up reactions.
Can be reused.
With the increase of temperature, enzyme activity increases too. The phenomena
occurs until the reaction obtain the optimum point, where the temperature is so high, that
increased a little more will damage the enzymes structure. At this point, the enzyme ceases
to function; a phenomenon called enzyme or protein denaturation.
Extremes in acidity (pH) can also cause the protein structure of enzymes to denature.
Poisons often work by denaturing enzymes or occupying the enzymes active site so that it
Michael Roberts, Michael Reiss, advanced Biology, UK, Cheltenham, Nelson (2000).
2
(2009).
3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agaricus_bisporus
Hypothesis:
According to the background information, the temperature has a big influence on the
rate of reaction and therefore on enzyme activity. Increases the temperature of the
environment, will increase the rate of reaction. This pattern will continue, till the enzyme get
4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agaricus_bisporus
Variables:
Independent:
and
Dependent:
Controlled:
The same size and type of test tubes. This will eliminate a source of error
during the process of measuring the high of the foam produced.
Once prepared homogeneous solution for all trials. This will eliminate a source
of error, because every trial will the same ratio of Agaricus bisporus to distilled
water.
Careful timing. In this experiment, we wait just only for 5 seconds before
taking measurements. This requires focus and high precision. Good stopper
will be essential.
Rubber gloves.
Tweezers.
Methodology:
I.
II.
III.
Pour homogeneous solution into 200cm3 beaker and cover it to prevent water loss
from the mixture.
IV.
V.
Pour 200g of water into 300 cm3 beaker and check the temperature using noncontact
digital infrared thermometer laser. We want the temperature to be
a) If it is too high place the beaker in freezer and keep checking the temperature
Place beaker with water into polystyrene cup. This will help to slow the heat loss/
gain from environment. This will make experimental results more accurate.
VII.
Put the first test tube into water bath and wait for three minutes. Measure the time with
the stopper, to avoid mistakes.
VIII.
After 3 minutes, the homogeneous solution get the temperature of the water bath.
Immediately take out the test tube and add 3 drops of 3% hydrogen peroxide.
IX.
Wait 5 seconds and using ruler measure the height of produced foam.
X.
Record the data and again put 1 cm3of homogeneous solution into the next test tube.
XI.
Check the temperature of water bath and if the temperature changed and:
a) If it is too high place the beaker in freezer and keep checking the temperature until
desired one.
XII.
Place beaker with water into polystyrene cup. This will help to slow the heat loss/
gain from environment. This will make experimental results more accurate.
XIII.
Put the next test tube into water bath and wait for three minutes. Measure the time
with the stopper, to avoid mistakes.
XIV.
After 3 minutes, the homogeneous solution get the temperature of the water bath.
Immediately take out the test tube and add 3 drops of 3% hydrogen peroxide.
XV.
Wait 5 seconds and using ruler measure the height of produced foam.
XVI.
Record the data and repeat the steps X to XV for the rest 8 test tubes.
XVII.
Repeat the steps from IV to XVI for the next homogeneous solutions at temperature
and
Safety rules:
Data collection:
Qualitative data:
, the foam was absent, which is the result of denatured protein. This
led me to notice trend that with the increase of temperature, the foam height increases,
Contrary, in
and
Quantitative data:
Data processing:
Mean:
Mean is the average of outcomes obtained from all trials for one type of
solution. It will be very useful in drawing conclusions. Considering the average value
for each type of medium, we will be able to see the pattern the relationship between
the concentration of ethanol and the rate of diffusion. The formula is:
,
where
Table 2.
0.0
40
1.50
30
3.51
20
1.81
10
0.76
Picture 2.
Picture represents the results obtained from ANOVA test calculated in Excel.
From the picture 2 we can easily notice that in this case with critical
value of 0.05, F value equal to 572.620 is significantly greater than F critical
value equal to 2.579. What is more, the P value is very small, much below
0.05, what reflects ratio between F and F crit. This means that we can reject
https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/one-way-anova-statistical-guide.php
10
Uncertainties:
Calculating uncertainties is very important for analyzing experimental data.
We have already calculated mean and standard deviation, but what we also need is the
uncertainties involving mediums.
1) Total percentage uncertainty
Table 3.
6.67
30
2.76
20
5.50
10
13.64
2) Absolute uncertainty
Table 4.
0.0
40
0.1
30
0.1
20
0.1
10
0.1
11
Data presentation:
Now, as we collected and processed all data and calculated uncertainties, we can
present them together in one table and then translate into graph.
Table 5.
100
0.000.0
40
1.500.1
30
3.510.1
20
1.810.1
10
0.760.1
I displayed results on the graph, but I was not able to make a trend line, because in my
investigation I did not find optimum temperature and its value.
12
13
Conclusion:
Having my knowledge and going on background information, I can conclude that the
experimental results are reasonable and justifiable. During the experiment I confirmed that
my hypothesis was correct, because as we could notice with the increase the enzyme activity
expresses as the height of foam, increases with the increase of temperature. At low
temperature, enzymes work much slower, because the movement of particles is too slow, they
do not catalyze and therefore are not able to speed up the reaction. As temperature increases,
the rate of reaction increases to the optimum point, which in my experiment is little above
30C. We can see that at
chemical reactions in Agarius biporus. This shows that the reaction starts to becoming
denatured and that this process is much faster than the increasing the enzyme activity. At the
end, at 100 C , the enzyme becomes denatured, the protein changes its shape and are useless
(inactive in biological reaction) and stop working. Points plotted on the graph 1, proves that
the slope of enzyme activity increases slower with increase the increase of temperature, than
decreases after reaching optimum temperature. It means that even a little higher temperature
than optimum, makes a significant damage to the enzyme.
Evaluation:
During this experiment a certain number of systematic errors were made while reading
the height of foam. I used ruler and my sight to measure those values. It could be improved by
use of a professional equipment, or by use of test tubes with scale on their walls. This would
to some extend decrease human error.
What is more, as I was conducting trials, homogenous mixture was kept in one place
and with time I noticed that at the bottom of beaker, the solution was a little bit more dense
than on the top. This could significantly affect my results because as I was taking solution
samples for the next trials, they might have different Agaricus bisporus concentration and
give less accurate results. The way to avoid it, is to stir the solution before taking a sample.
Moreover during heating homogenous substances test tubes were not covered, same
water evaporated from test tubes as well as from water bath. I did not replace the later lost
14
15
Bibliography:
Books:
1. Atkins P., de Paula J., 2006. Physical chemistry for the Life Sciences, UK, Oxford,
Webs:
16