International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(10) October 2013, Pages: 766-774

TI Journals

International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences

ISSN
2306-7276

www.tijournals.com

A Model to Identify the Impact of Components of Higher Education

Management on University-Industry Interaction in Tehran City
Mehdi Noursina *1, Hamid Reza Arasteh 2, Nader Gholi Ghourchian 3
1

Department of Higher Education Administration, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Faculty Member, Department of Higher Education Administration,, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3
Prof., Department of Higher Education Administration, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2

AR TIC LE INF O

AB STR AC T

Keywords:

This paper aims to identify the impact of components of higher education management on
university-industry interaction and presenting a model in this field. This research, in terms of
objective, is an applied study and in terms of time, is cross sectional. Data and information is
related to the year 2012.with a survey methodology, the population consists of two groups of large
industries and universities of Tehran. The first group includes public universities, Islamic Azad
University, University of Applied Science and Payam Nour University Which is a total number of
141. The second group is large industries in Tehran including industries that are likely to have a
cooperative relationship with the University whose number is equal to 63 factories and industrial
enterprises. In this study in order to gather information, triangulation method was used. Using
triangulation of data collection methods, three method of library (reading books, theses, articles
and related content available on the internet) to collect secondary data in order to develop
theoretical and research literature, and Questionnaire and interview methods to collect primary
data. In order to assess the reliability of the survey tools used in this study, Cronbach's alpha was
used. Cronbach's alpha calculating for all variables were greater than 0.7 and therefore is
acceptable. The variables studied in this research were include social and cultural, structural,
administrative, educational and financial components and were prioritized in both groups of
industry and university. The first priority of universities is social and cultural components, but in
industries it is administrative component.

Higher Education
University-Industry Interaction
Management
Tehran City

2013 Int. j. econ. manag. soc. sci. All rights reserved for TI Journals.

1.

Introduction

Today, tendency of universities towards industry-required trained manpower as well as the applied, academic researches is more revealed.
Establishing interaction between university and industry and then, Commercialization and application of science in society is important.
Vacuum is sensed in Intermediary institutions such as Developments of innovation and technology development organizations [11].
The globalization, formation of various unions among communities, development of domestic and foreign markets, and particularly the
weakened financial support of the government for universities are of the causes through which universities are inclined to challenges of
customers, trades and market demands [24;26; 28]. Therefore, universities undergo training for business deals and lead their intellectual
property towards economic values [5]. The university authorities believe that the higher education goes through a new cycle of life called
silent revolution. Also, regard it as academic capitalism, an academic rationality in higher education being resulted from new economics of
knowledge [16].
A study on stages of development of Iran's higher education demonstrates the commencement of a business tendency, interaction between
universities and industries through joint projects, the establishment of joint offices of universities and industries, the offices of technology
transfer, nascent and spin-off companies established by preliminary universities, and practical training given to other organizations for
which an intuition is received. The formation of industry-communicated councils and higher council of university and industry indicate that
Iran's higher education regards the industry as its first customer and attempts to satisfy its demands [1].
At the conferences bringing together the liaison officers of universities and industries, it is explicitly acknowledged that universities should
be ranked in accordance with the degree of their bond with industries and with commercialization of research findings. In addition, the
transformation of the intermediate management into senior management in liaison offices, emphasis on development of commercial culture
in universities, and the further consideration of commercially-potential projects indicate an official, wide-ranged commencement of this
trend in Iran [10].

* Corresponding author.
Email address: mehdi_noursina@yahoo.com

A Model to Identify the Impact of Components of Higher Education Management on University-Industry Interaction in Tehran City

767

Internat ional Jour nal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Social Sciences , 2(10) October 2013

Other countries, similarly, make their best endeavors in order to create a close interaction between universities and industries. These
attempts, according to experts in economy, acquire a particular significance as the most crucial cause for industrialization of developed
countries which is accomplished first by employment of competent, educated persons and then by a close interaction between universities
and industries (19). In other words, as the university is an academic institution of research and the industry an economic one, no success is
achieved in each of these institutions unless they encourage a mutual cooperation [15].
Iran universities discuss an applied function of research findings, according to the place held and the purposes served in the Fourth
Document of Social, Economic Development Program, and purposes served by Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. But, any
accomplishment in this regard requires the related operating, success-achieved conditions to be known [11]. The present study, therefore, is
an attempt at offering an effective model of determining components that affect the interaction between universities and industries, by
which the gap between them may be bridged. The findings may help the university authorities to implement more effective strategies
especially as regards the management of higher education.

2.

Previous research

2.1 .Theoretical Studies

In U.S. ,Commercial bond between the university and the business world during civil wars and after it, Showed a trend of increasing. Yale
Report in 1828 was Evidence for this claim .According to this report ,After that America's higher education was questioned about
traditional curriculum, The trend towards the development of practical purposes in the curriculum was developed [18;24]. The emergence
of the research university model in Germany is a new form of academic rationality .As the result,in a course of time, many of such
laboratories were set up in known universities such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Michigan. Such attempts
formed the first close business bond with industry as the first partner of universities in U.S. and Europe [21].
The history of commercialization of research findings in Iran which is formed in terms of interaction between universities and the
institutions being unrelated to university can be grouped under the following periods [1]: (1) the period from the first-established university
to 1961, within which a number of informal interaction occurred but did not satisfy the demands of industrial units, (2) the period from
1961 to 1982, within which new universities were established in Tehran and other big cities and students required urgently to gain
information from industrial units, and (3) the period from 1982 up to now, within which CulturalRevolution Council was formed and a
number of university-industry interaction offices were administered in Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, industry-related
ministries and universities.
2.2. Background Studies
Grady (2002), in his PhD dissertation, pointed out that the interaction between universities and industries for the commercialization of
research findings leads to cultural clash and resistance of some researches against the market. His study population consisted of the
researches of medical colleges in Western Canada. A combination of ANOVA and CHEW tests were utilized in order to put them under
different groups on the basis of the studied department. The findings of his study, being recorded on the basis of Hierarchical Moderated
Regression Analyses, suggested that personal reasons create the most impact upon the cultural clash and the tendency of researchers
towards the commercialization of their research findings. Furthermore, the impact of environmental components as the narrower focus of
attention than personal components is required to be taken into serious consideration.
Kutinalahti (2005) suggested that universities in the new millennium stimulated their activities in a finance-valued environment, on the
basis of which he studied the personal, college-related and university-related impact of business activities (teaching courses for which the
tuition fees are received, the conducting joint researches between universities and industries and offering academic counseling) on freedom
for conducting research. 92 percent of respondents considered freedom on the choice of research topic, the methodology of research and
release of research findings as the most crucial requirements. Moreover,they regarded decrease in research time and change of research
topic as the most important consequence of the commercialization of research findings. They were not concerned with the personal impact,
yet they were beset by the systematic consequence of the commercialization on research-conducting freedom in universities and colleges.
Jahed (2011), in his Ph.D dissertation on management, examined the reasons making impact on the commercialization of research findings
in higher education, proposing a model for following the trend of commercialization. The findings demonstrated that personal reasons
including self-efficacy and the need for power exert the most impact on the commercialization of research findings. The findings of factor
analysis and assessment of the model revealed that his three-factor model was the most appropriate. Also, there was significant correlation
between the major components of the commercialization (personal reasons as well as internal and external affairs of organizations).
Noori (2010), in her MA thesis ,studied the relationship between the effective components, the effective measures for and a standard model
on the commercialization of the research findings in Iranian Company of Eize. The analysis of questionnaires given to the
commercialization-related experts and managers of this company through inferential statistics showed that a conceptual, strategydependent, operational model can be utilized for the commercialization of the research findings.

3.

Research Questions
H1. What model can be presented according to components of higher education management to promote cooperation between
universities and industries?
H2. 2. What is the degree of appropriateness of the model?

Mehdi Noursina et al.

768

Int ernational Journal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Soci al Sci ences , 2(10) October 2013

4.

Methodology

This paper aims to identify the impact of components of higher education management on university-industry interaction and presenting a
model in this field. This research, in terms of objective, is an applied study and in terms of time, is cross sectional. Data and information is
related to the year 2012.with a survey methodology, the population consists of two groups, large industries and universities of Tehran .The
following steps were, also, taken. First, it was attempted to form two groups. The first group includes public universities (25), Islamic Azad
University (19 branches), University of Applied Science (79 branches) and Payam Nour University (18 branches) Which is a total number
of 141. The second group is large industries in Tehran including industries that are likely to have a cooperative relationship with the
University whose number is equal to 63 factories and industrial enterprises.
The sample is divided into a first group and a second group:
First group: according to Background documents and research in universities, include: 8 public universities ( Tehran University, Industrial
University of Amir Kabir(or Polytechnics), Industrial University of Sharif, University of Shahid Beheshti, University of Science and
Industry, Industrial University of K.N.Toosi, University of Tarbiat Modarres and University of Allameh Tabatabai), 5 Islamic Azad
universities (Science and Research Branch, North, South and Central branches), 5 universities of applied science (Food Industry branch,
Training and Industrial Research branch, Education and Research branch of Ministry of Industries and Mines, central branch of University
of Industries and Mines, and Industrial Research branch) and finnaly, 3 Payam Nour universities (South , East and West branches).
Second group: included 63 factories and industrial companies. They, in accordance witha number of filed documents, were regarded
highly probable institutes in close cooperation with universities. Questionnaires were sent to 33 units in person and 30 units by post. Table
1 shows the details.
Table 1. Number of Questionnaires
Groups

Numbers of given and or sent

questionnaires

Number of received, and

suitable for questionnaires

105 (5 questionnaires for each university)

165 (5 questionnaires for each unit)
90 (3 questionnaires for each unit)
360

96
96
28
220

Numbers

Universities
Industries

Questionnaires given in person

Questionnaires given in person
Postal questionnaires

21 universities
33 units
30 units

Total

In this study in order to gather information, triangulation method was used. This method is essentially a way to validate the quality and
efforts to achieve a convergent information [6]. Using triangulation of data collection methods, three method of library (reading books,
theses, articles and related content available on the internet) to collect secondary data in order to develop theoretical and research literature,
and Questionnaire and interview methods to collect primary data. The result of the semi-structured interview was used for making the
survey tool (questionnaire). The questions according to five-choice Likert scale were made from very low (1) to very much (5). A number
of semi-structured interviews were conducted in order to confirm the validity of questionnaires. The interviewed persons were as follows:
(1) Five professors of management,
(2) Five professors of industry-related fields, and;
(3) Two professors of statistics.

5.

Examined components

A number of components were recognized according to previous studies [9; 1;12; 2; 7; 3], but here they are categorized and are covered in
more organized way:

Structural component
Cultural and social component
Educational component
administrative component
Financial component

The reliability of questionnaires was assessed by Cronbach's Alpha which are seen in table 2. This method, to estimate the reliability as
internal consistency of measurement scale, is common more than other methods [9].
Table 2. Cronbach's Alpha
Components
1
2
3
4
5

Structural component
Cultural and social component
Educational component
Administrative component
Financial component

Cronbach's Alpha
0.736
0.921
0.922
0.789
0.881

A Model to Identify the Impact of Components of Higher Education Management on University-Industry Interaction in Tehran City

769

Internat ional Jour nal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Social Sciences , 2(10) October 2013

6.

Results and discussion

6.1 .Testing first question

According to The standard estimate of the factor analysis in the university (Figure 1) and industry (Figure 2) ,first the components of the
overall higher education management which are extracted from the University of and industry can be presented in Figure 3 and then its
Conceptual model can be presented as in figure 4.

Figure 1. Standard estimate of the factor analysis in the university

Mehdi Noursina et al.

770

Int ernational Journal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Soci al Sci ences , 2(10) October 2013

Figure 2. standard estimate of the factor analysis in industry

A Model to Identify the Impact of Components of Higher Education Management on University-Industry Interaction in Tehran City

771

Internat ional Jour nal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Social Sciences , 2(10) October 2013

Structural

Structural
Cultural and
Social

Cultural and
Social

Educational

Industry

University

Educational

Interaction

Administrative

Administrative

Financial

Financial

Figure 3. the overall shape of Higher Education Management components affecting the relationship between university and industry

Figure 4 illustrates the final model of the present study, being resulted from components making impact on the interaction between
universities and industries. All five components (structural, cultural and social, educational, administrative, and financial components) in
universities and industrial units made impact on enhancing interaction. However, some distinction lay in the degree of their impact,
indicating that the examined universities and industries attached different significance to the focused components. For instance, the impact
of structural component was .92 in universities and .71 in industrial units. This conceptual model displays the effective components as well,
each with a different degree of impact in universities and industries. For example, awarding educational and researching scholarship as the
only component of the financial component was viewed differently by university and industry .The impact of the components in these
communities can be summarized as follows:(1) the cultural, social component 100% in universities and %99 in industrial units, (2) the
structural component %92 in universities and 71% in industrial units, (3) the administrative component 82% in universities and 100% in
industrial units, (4) the educational component 43% in universities and 92% in industrial units, and (5) the financial component 32% in
universities and 34% in industrial units.
6.2. Testing second question
6.2.1. Fitness tests of model
The purpose of model fitting is that to what extent a model has consistency and agreement with the relevant data. There are a broad set of
fitness criteria and indices that can be used to measure fitness of model. A fitness index depending on the method of estimation, the
complexity of the model, assumptions of normality or a combination of of the above conditions, acts differently [13]

Goodness of Fit Index (GFI): the relative amount of variance and covariance is measured together. GFI ranges between 0 and 1
and is desirable to be equal to .9 or higher.
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI): the mean square is substituted with the total square in denominator and numerator (GFI1). It ranges between 0 and 1 and is desirable to be equal to .9 or higher.
Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA): In good models, it is equal to or lesser than .05. The models in which
RMSEA is .1 are considered weak-fitted. The more this index is near to 0, the more the model is fitted.
Normed-fit Index (NFI): This index, being susceptible to the sample size, is not strongly suggested for the small size of samples.
As indicated by Bentler (1990), the NFI values equal to or greater than .9 (as compared with zero models) is considered
appropriate for measuring theoretical model fit. The value of .8 is also suggested by other scholars.
Comparative Fit Index (CFI): The fit of the mode is measured by a comparison of a so-called independent model in which there
is no relation between the variables with the respective proposed model. The values greater than .90 is regarded a criterion for the
model fit.
Chi-Square (x2): It is very affected by the sample size so far as the large size of sample increases x2 value .This increase is not
considered a false model.

In order to examine the conceptual model in Table 3, six common indexes with an acceptable value of each index proposed in previous
research were used.
Table3: fix indexes of research model
Fit Index
2

X /df
RMSEA
NFI
CFI
GFI
AGFI

Statistics of Measurement
model of industry
2.88
0.077
0.88
0.89
0.90
0.88

Statistics of Measurement
model of University
2.76
0.076
0.89
0.90
0.92
0.90

The suggested value

<5
<0.06 (Joreskong and Sorbom, 1996)
>0.90 (Fornel and Larcker, 1981)
>0.90 (Joreskong and Sorbom, 1996)
>0.90 (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988)
>0.80 (Etezadi-Amoli and Farhoomand, 1996)

Mehdi Noursina et al.

772

Int ernational Journal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Soci al Sci ences , 2(10) October 2013

The significance of higher

research centers

Structural
components

Cultural
and Social
components

By-laws
Founding Knowledge-based
companies
The age of students and
craftsmen
Students' and Craftsmen's
sense of dignity for
economic products
Fostering the commerceinclined culture in
universities and the
knowledge-based culture in
industrial units
Broadcast of Cultural
fosterage, scientific
promotion & industrial
stimulation
Globalization

UniversityIndustry
Interaction

Educational
components

Administrative
components

Improving the mutual

understanding
Developing applied,
training programs for
encouraging cooperation
Numbers of patent-filed
articles published by
researchers
Determining research
priorities
operating the promoting
system of faculties by
taking industrial researches
into more careful
consideration
Offering industrial training
courses
Participation of experts in
industry in educational
research activities of
universities
Training industrial
managers in universities
Risk management for
conflict of interests
Adopting Intellectual or
spiritual capital for
inventors

Financial
component

Awarding educational,
researching scholarship

0.23

University

0.82

Industry

0.60
0.54
0.82
0.74
0.81
0.75
0.79

University
Industry
University
Industry
University
Industry
University

0.83

Industry

0.34

University

0.23

Industry

0.37

University

0.33

Industry

0.25
0.34
0.43
0.91
0.64

University
Industry
University
Industry
University

0.86

Industry

0.32

University

0.48

Industry

0.57
0.46

University
Industry

0.76

University

S2

S3
S5
C1
C2

C3

C7

C9
E1
E4
E5
E10

E11
0.61

Industry

0.73
0.42
0.67

University
Industry
University

0.44

Industry

0.78
0.76
0.81
0.64
0.56

University
Industry
University
Industry
University

0.67

Industry

0.85
0.21

University
Industry

Figure 4. A Conceptual Model for Components of Higher Education Management

E12

E13

M2

M4

F6

A Model to Identify the Impact of Components of Higher Education Management on University-Industry Interaction in Tehran City

773

Internat ional Jour nal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Social Sciences , 2(10) October 2013

7.

Conclusion

In today's developed world, the traditional universities are transformed into flexible, society-oriented, and industrial-based institutions
because their activities are not stimulated unless they satisfy the demands of industrial units and unless they make their findings applied.
The present study proposed a comprehensive model for detecting the impact of components of higher education management on interaction
between universities and industry in Tehran and examined the model fit. The variables studied in this research were include social and cultural,
structural, administrative, educational and financial components and were prioritized in both groups of industry and university. The first priority of
universities is social and cultural components, but in industries it is administrative component. Financial component in both communities is the last priority.

Furthermore, a number of subgroups formed for each component were given different priorities in universities and industrial units. For
instance, Age of students and craftsmen has the highest rank in the social and cultural components(81%); establishing Knowledge-based
companies in universities and industry in the structural components are top rated (82%); Risk management of conflicts of interest and
industry is of primary importance in the administrative components(81%) and in the educational components, reforming Promotion system
of the faculty to give more value to industrial research activitiesis more important (76%).also, in financial components, Providing scholarships
and sponsering from industry To the University and vice versa, is of great importance(85%).

The findings of this research is consistent with the findings of Domino (2006), Kutinalahti (2005), Todorvic (2004), Grady (2002),
Bagherinejhad (2008), and Jahed (2011).
Domino in his study has referred to financial factors influencing the market-oriented higher education. Kutinalahti studied the effect of the
interaction between the market and the university. His Findings in some financial factors are consistent with our research. Todorvic In his
study on entrepreneurial orientation investigates the incidence of market-oriented activities in universities. Grady in his PhD dissertation,
pointed out that the interaction between universities and industries for the commercialization of research findings leads to cultural clash and
resistance of some researches against the market. This paper was, as well, in agreement with Bagherinejad (2008) emphasizing, in his
general study that a particular mechanism exists in the interaction between university community and industrial community. A similar
consistency lay with Jahed's findings, indicating that environmental components (internal as well as external) are of significance in
commercialization of research findings in industries and markets.

References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]

[15]

[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]

Abbasi, B. (2009). TheImpact of Commercialization on Value System of University Community: Development of a Good Model. PhD Dissertation
on Management of Higher Education. Iran: Azad University of Tehran Science and Research Branch.
Arasteh, H. (2004). Interaction between University Community & Industrial Community.The Journal of Research & Curriculum of Higher
Education10(3), pp. 52-92.
Awbery, S.M. (2006).Making the "Invisible Hand" Visible: The Case for Dialogue about Academic Capitalism.Retrieved in June 15, 2013 from
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED469338.
BagheriNejad, J. (2008). Interaction between University Community &industry for Development of Technology in Iran: Mechanism & proposal.
The Journal of Technology & Science Policy1(1), pp. 1-13.
Bentler, P.M., 1990. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238246.
Danaeefard, H. (2004). Knowledge-Based Economy & Institutional Integrity of University Community. Iran: Roshd Publishing Company.
Decter, M., Bennet, D.J &Leseure, M.(2007). University to business technology transfer- UK and U.S. comparison.The Journal of
Technovation27(3), pp145-155.
Delavar, A. (2004). Theoretical & Scientific Principles of Research in Human and Social Sciences.Iran: Roshd Publishing Company.
Denison, E.F (2005). Why Growth Rates Differ.U.S.: The Brookings Institution.
Domino and et al. (2006). Higher education marketing concerns: factor influence students choice of colleges. The Journal ofBusiness ReviewVol 6,
pp. 101-111.
fakoor, B. (2006). Effective Conditions for Commercialization of Research Findings in Universities.The Journal of Rahyaft 40 (2).
Feldman, K.S (2007). The commercialization of public higher education: Balancing academic, fiscal and market values.PhD dissertation on
EducationalLeadership.Mexico: university of New Mexico.
Grady, K.O (2002).Influence of personal and environmental factors academic medical researcher decision to commercialize the results of their
research.PhD Dissertation on philosophy. Canada: University of west Canada
Hashemidaran, H. &GhaedMohammadi, M. (2007).Significant of Interaction between Universities & Industrial Units for Higher Education Reform
in Third Millennium.In conference of higher education in third millennium (p.2). Iran: Institution of Young Researchers of Roodehen Azad
University.
Jahed, H. (2011). Effective Components on Commercialization of Higher Education Findings & A model for showing Correlation between Them:
A study of Azad University of Tehran Science and Research. PhD Dissertation on Management of Higher Education. Iran: Azad University of
Tehran Science and Research.
Kalantari, Kh. (2009). Data Analysis in Social, Economic Researches. Iran: Farhange Saba Publication.
Konecny, E. (1995). Universities & Industrial Research. (M. Shafiee, 2009). Iran: Industrial University of Amir Kabir.
Kutinalahti, p. (2005).University approaching market: intertwinig scientific and entrepreneurial goal VTT publication.PhD dissertation on
Educational leadership. Australia: university of Australia.
.Noori, S. (2010).Effective Components of Commercialization: A study of Eize Iran Company.MA Thesis on Technology Management. Iran:
Department of Management and Economy of Azad University of Science and Research.
Plewa, C. &Quester, P. (2005).Marketing Orientation in University-Industry linkages.The Journal of Business Administration,Vol. 34, pp. 3-21.
Powers, J.B. (2000). Academic entrepreneurship in higher education: institutional effects on performance of university technology transfer.PhD
Dissertation on philosophy.U.S.: Indiana University.

774

Mehdi Noursina et al.

Int ernational Journal of Economy, Mana ge ment and Soci al Sci ences , 2(10) October 2013

[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]

Richardson C.R et al. (1998). Higher education governance: balancing institutional and market influence.U.S.: National center for public policy and
higher education. Pp. 1-26.
Shafiee, M. (2006). Interaction between University Community & Industrial Community: A Murky Past &A Bright Future. Iran: Industrial
University of Amir Kabir.
Sharifee, H.P &Sharifee, N. (2004).Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Iran: Sokhan Publishing Company.
Sharghi, A. (2004). International Relations & Scientific Promotion.In Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Iran: Institution of Great Persian
Encyclopedia.
Taghavinia, K. (2011). A study of Inventors' Regard to Commercialization of Inventions.MA Thesis on Entrepreneurship Management.Iran:
Management Department of Tehran University.
Todorvic, Z.W. (2004). The entrepreneurial orientation of university department and to the incidence of commercial activity.PhD thesis on
philosophy in management sciences.Canada: University of waterloo.
Willmott, H. (1995). Administrative TheAcademics: Commodification and Control in Development of University Education in UK.Human
Relations, 48(9). pp. 2-8.