Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Weight per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Outstanding (5)
* Teaching-Learning Process
June 2014
March 2015
40 %
(3%)
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
161-199 Daily
LPs / log on
(3%)
(3%)
(3%)
Objective was
stated w/ 1
behavioral
indicator that is
missing
Objective was
stated w/ 1-2
behavioral
indicator that is
missing
Objective was
stated w/ 3-4
behavioral
indicator that is
missing
Objective was
stated w/ 1-2
behavioral
indicator that is
missing
(3%)
81-99% of each
class/subject
handled
developed HOTS
80% of each
class/subject
handled
developed HOTS
60-79% of each
class/subject
handled
developed HOTS
59% of each
class/subject
handled
developed HOTS
(3%)
91-99% DLC
were attained
every grading
period
*Positive/productive learning
environment
RATING
SCORE
June 2014
March 2015
(6%)
5 of the 6
indicators were
attained/met
4 of the 6
indicators were
attained/met
3 of the 6
indicators were
attained/met
1-2 of the 6
indicators were
attained/met
(3%)
Prepared and
used 2 IMs in
every
lesson/class
handled
Prepared and
used 1 IM in
every
lesson/class
handled
NO IM used in
lesson/class
handled
NO IM used in
coping on the
board the whole
duration of the
session
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for
the ff: 3 of the 4
activities
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for
the ff: 2 of the 4
activities
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for the
ff: 1 of the 4
activities
No checking of
attendance was
carried out in
any of the
activities
mentioned
6%
(3%)
June 2014
March 2015
Submitted the
AR in 3 Grading
periods
Submitted the
AR in 2 Grading
periods
Submitted the AR
in 1 Grading
period
No AR and
interventions
initiated
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for
the ff: 3 of the 4
activities
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for
the ff: 2 of the 4
activities
Attendance
checking was
systematically
carried out for the
ff: 1 of the 4
activities
No checking of
attendance was
carried out in
any of the
activities
mentioned
10%
(2%)
8%
(2%)
Absence of 1
indicator
Absence of 2
indicators
Absence of 3
indicators
Absence of 4
indicators
(2%)
6-7 of the 8
indicators were
met
4-5 of the 8
indicators were
met
2-3 of the 8
indicators were
met
1 of the 8
indicators were
met
(2%)
5 out of 6
indicators were
met
4 out of 6
indicators were
met
3 out of 6
indicators were
met
1-2 out of 6
indicators were
met
(2%)
Absence of 1
indicator
Absence of 2
indicators
Absence of 3
indicators
Absence of 4
indicators
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
* Pupils/Students Outcomes
June 2014
March 2015
5%
Post test
Summative/Long test/ unit
test
Periodical test (5% increase in
MPS)
Daily quizzes/assessment
5%
76-90% passed
in all tests
conducted with
75% and above
MPS
75% passed in
all tests
conducted with
75% and above
MPS
60-74% passed in
all tests
conducted with
75% and above
MPS
2-3% increase in
the MPS over
the baseline
(NAT & NCAE)
0-1% increase in
the MPS over
the baseline
(NAT & NCAE)
Fall short by 5%
in the MPS
below the
baseline (NAT &
NCAE)
0.1-0.9% Drop
out & failure
rate were
attained
3% and above
Drop out &
failure rate were
attained
a.
b.
1.
(1%)
2.
(1%)
3.
(1%)
4.
Failure Rate
(1%)
5.
(1%)
95-99%
Graduation/pro
motion rate
90-94%
Graduation/pro
motion rate
85-89%
Graduation/prom
otion rate
(5%)
Prepared 9-10
summative test
w/ TOS every
grading period
reflecting KPU
Prepared 8
summative test
w/ TOS every
grading period
reflecting KPU
Prepared 6-7 m
summative test
w/ TOS every
grading period
reflecting KPU
Prepared 5
summative test
w/ TOS every
grading period
reflecting KPU
2. Conduct remediation/enrichment
programs to improve performance
indicators
2a. To conduct remedial
classes/interventions to 80% of the
students who do not master in all tests
conducted (for every section/subjects
handled) w/ 75% & above MPS
June 2014
March 2015
5%
81-94% of the
students
handled (per
section/subject)
achieved 75%
and above MPS
80% of the
students
handled (per
section/subject)
achieved 75%
and above MPS
61-79% of the
students handled
(per
section/subject)
achieved 75% and
above MPS
60% or below of
the students
handled (per
section/subject)
achieved 75%
and above MPS
June 2014
March 2015
4%
Conducted 4
regular/periodic
PTA meetings
with 61-84%
attendance of
parents/guardia
ns
Conducted 4
regular/periodic
PTA meetings
with 60%
attendance of
parents/guardia
ns
Conducted 4
regular/periodic
PTA meetings
with 41-59%
attendance of
parents/guardian
s
Conducted 4
regular/periodic
PTA meetings
with 40% and
below
attendance of
parents/guardia
ns
June 2014
March 2015
2%
100%
Completion but
not adopted by
the school
75%
accomplishment
completion
50%
accomplishment
completion
None
June 2014
March 2015
3%
Attended 11-12
meetings
Attended 10
meetings
Attended 6-9
meetings
Attended 5 or
less meetings
June 2014
March 2015
3%
Participated in 5 or more
seminar/conferences including the 2
INSETs
Participated in
6-8
seminar/confere
nces including
the 2 INSETs
Participated in
5-6
seminar/confere
nces including
the 2 INSETs
Participated in 2
INSETs
Participated in 1
INSET
* PTA meetings/conferences
organized
* Community Involvement
* Academic monitoring/following
up
* Projects/events/activities
initiated/undertaken
* Action Research
* Published work
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
___________________________
Rater
__________________________
Ratee