International Journal of Applied Engineering

Research and Development (IJAERD)

ISSN(P): 2250-1584; ISSN(E): 2278-9383
Vol. 4, Issue 6, Dec 2014, 11-16
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

ON THE DERIVATIVE AND LOGARITHMIC TYPE OF ANALYTIC FUNCTION

REPRESENTED BY DIRICHLET SERIES
ANUPMA RASTOGI
Department of Mathematics and Astronomy, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT
In the present paper to study precisely the growth of function of zero order which are represented by Dirichlet
series and analytic in the half plane. The concepts of the derivatives of the function are introduced by many
mathematicians. I obtained same results on the relative growth of maximum terms and rank of maximum term.

KEYWORDS: Derivatives Analytic Function Dirichlet Series, Type Logarithmic Type

1. INTRODUCTION
Consider the Dirichlet series

f(S) =

a e
s

(1.1)

n =1

wher e 0 <

n < n +1` 0 , s=+it ,t R

{a n }n=1 is a sequence of complex number and

lim sup
n

If

=D<

(1.2)

and are abscissa of convergence and abscissa of absolute convergence of (1.1), and since (1.2) is a

satisfied we have

lim sup

==-

log | an |

M()= l .u.b |
n

f ( + it ) |

m() = max | a n | e
n 1

N ( ) = max n : m ( ) =| a n | e n
n >1

(1.3)

Let f(n)(s) denotes the nth derivatives of f(s). Then f(n)(s) is also analytic for < likewise we defined
M (, f(n)) m(,fn) N(,fn) of the derivatives fn(s)
www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org

12

Anupma Rastogi

If the following relation

lim (n +1 n ) = > 0)

n inf

Holds then [1]

1 lim sup

log{ N ( ) (1 e )}
log log(1 e )

(1.5)

is the logarithmic order of f(s) further if 1 < < then logarithmic type T and lower

Where

logarithmic type t are defined as [2]

sup

lim

inf

log M ( )

[log(1 e

(1.6)

(1.6) is also equivalent to

log m( )

sup

lim

inf

[log(1 e )]

(1.7)
t

It is also has been proved that

lim sup

log + | an | e n
(log n )

}= T

(1.8)

This chapter, we study the relative growth of M (,fn) and N (,fn) with respect tom(,f) and N (, f)
respectively as approaches to .

2. MAIN RESULTS

Theorem 1: Let f(s)=

a e
s

n =1

logarithmic order

be an analytic function in half plane < satisfying (1.3). If

is the

T is logarithmic type and t is lower logarithmic type of f(s), then

T < lim sup

lim inf

log M ( , f (1) (s ))

[log(1 e )]

log M ( , f (1) (s ))

[log(1 e )]

T + 1 and

(2.1)

= t

Proof: we have

Impact Factor (JCC):1.6842

Index Copernicus Value (ICV):3.0

13

On the Derivative and Logarithmic Type of Analytic Function Represented by Dirichlet Series

f ' (s ) = a n n e sn

(2.3)

n =1

Considering the following inequality (2.3)

N ( )m ( ) < M ( , f (1) (s ))

(2.4)

Taking log both side, divided it by log 1 e

and taking limit

we get

(2.5)

Obtain the other inequality, using (1.8) i.e. for given > 0 there is a positive integer n0, such that for all n>n0(
) we have

log | an |< (T + )(log n ) n

Also

M ( , f (1) (s )) | a n | e
n =1

a n | e

n +

where

n = no +1

(2.6)

<

exp{ (log )

n =1

exp (log n ) ( )n +

n = R +1

( )n

(2.7)

= T + +1

and

(D + )2
R=

log
-1

Now (2.7) can be written as

()
M ( , f (s )) P (n ) + exp{ (log )
R

n = no +1

( )n +

exp{ (log ) ( ) }

n = R +1

Where no is the sum of first no terms and is therefore bounded

Hence

M ( , f (1) (s )) o(1) + Re xp log

+ exp (log n ) ( )n
n = R +1

Now using the result [2] we get

log M , f (s ) < Re xp log

www.tjprc.org

(1)

[1 + o(1)]

(2.9)

editor@tjprc.org

14

Anupma Rastogi

divided (2.9) by

[log(1 e )]

lim sup

and taking superior limit as we get

log M ( , f (1) (s ))

[ log(1 - e

Again, since

- 1

T +1

(2.10)

1 t < , then using the result [3] we get

log M ( , f (1) (s )) < m( , f ) + log N ( , f (1) (s ))

Divinding the inequality by

lim inf

[log(1 e )]

log m ( , f (1) )

[ log(1 - e

- 1

and taking inferior limits as we get

(2.11)

Combing the result (2,5), (2.10), (2.11) we get (2.1) and (2.2).
Theorem 2: Let f(s) be analytic in the half plane <, of logarithmic order *. Then

m ( , f (1) (s ))

log
(1 e )
m( , f (s ))
lim sup
=1

- 1
log(1 - e )

(3.1)

Proof: using the inequality [3]

N ( )

M ( , f (1) (s ))
N ( , f (1 ) )
m ( , f )

And (1.5) we get directly (3.1)

Corollary : If is of logarithmic order * where 1< *< and f(n)(s) denotes the nth derivative of f(S)then

m ( , f )

(1 e )
m( , f )
=1
(n )

sup

lim

inf

[log(1 e

1
n

(3.3)

We get (3.3) by using (1.5) and [3]

Let

w( , n ) = N ( , f ( n ) ) N ( )

Then w(,n) is non negative, non decreasing difference function of for n=1,2. Let f(s) be an analytic function of
logarithmic order *.

Impact Factor (JCC):1.6842

Index Copernicus Value (ICV):3.0

15

On the Derivative and Logarithmic Type of Analytic Function Represented by Dirichlet Series

Here

w( , n ) as

for any n=1,2,3

Theorem 3: For n=1,2,3 and for some suitable value o, we have

lim sup

Where

log(1 e )

exp [w( y , n ) + n ( y )]dy

n 0

(4.1)

e y
1 e y

(y) =

Proof: For an analytic function f(s) defined by (1.1) we have (3.7) hence

log m( , f ) = o (1) + ( y )dy

0 < <

(4.2)

Replacing the function f by f(n) we get

log m( , f

(n )

) = o(1) + (
0

y , f (n )

)dy

(4.3)

Hence from (4.2) and (4.3), we have for all 0, 0<<

m ( , f (n ) )

m ( , f )

(1 e ) = o(1) + exp n1 [w( y, n ) + n ( y )]dy

[log(1 e )]
Divided it by

and taking the limit as

and using (3.3), we get (4.1)

REFERENCES
1.

Awasthi, K. N and Dixit K. K. On the logarithmic order of analytic functions represented by Dirichlet series.
Indian. J. Pure Appl. Math. 10(2); 1979, P.P171-182

2.

Awasthi, K. N and Dixit K. K. On the logarithmic order of analytic functions represented by Dirichlet series.
math. stu (1981)

3.

Rastogi, On the derivative of slow growth analytic function in the half plane; (communicated for publication)

www.tjprc.org

editor@tjprc.org