Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 1 of 15
Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT
v.
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota
Corporation,
Defendant.
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 2 of 15
Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC (Plaintiff or WFG) for its Complaint for
Trademark Infringement against Defendant Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
(Defendant or Old Republic) states and alleges as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
Defendant Old Republic has deliberately used Plaintiffs famous WFG trademark and name to
sell directly competing services, by running an advertisement that uses WFGs name and
federally registered trademark in a manner that is certain to cause confusion and mistake among
consumers in Oregon and elsewhere.
PARTIES
2.
Plaintiff WFG is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of
business at 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350, Portland, OR 97223. WFG conducts business in
this District.
3.
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota with its principal place of
business at 400 Second Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55401.
4.
Upon information and belief, Defendant owns, maintains, and operates the
website http://www.oldrepublictitle.com, through which Defendant markets and promotes its title
insurance services for sale in this District.
5.
Upon information and belief, Defendant directs its advertising toward this
District, where it transacts business through or as Old Republic Title Company of Oregon.
Upon information and belief, Defendant owns and controls Old Republic Title Company of
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 1
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 3 of 15
Oregon, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oregon with its
principal place of business at 1 Southwest Columbia Street, Suite 560, Portland, OR 97258.
JURISDICTION
6.
This action arises under the Trademark Laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C.
1051 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over WFGs claims pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
1121(a) and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.
7.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because the claims against
Defendant arise from activity Defendant has directed toward residents of this District. Upon
information and belief, Defendant has engaged in substantial and not isolated activities within
the State of Oregon by selling and/or offering title insurance and related services in Oregon
through Old Republic Title Company of Oregon and/or Defendants website, including through
use of the infringing advertisement detailed herein.
BACKGROUND FACTS
8.
WFG is the sole owner of the following U.S. trademark registrations (among
others):
Trademark
Registration Number
Issue Date
WFG
4,372,515
4,376,456
4,376,455
4,379,546
August 6, 2013
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 2
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 4 of 15
Trademark
Registration Number
Issue Date
4,379,540
August 6, 2013
4,362,002
July 2, 2013
4,395,372
September 3, 2013
4,500,945
These marks are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the Federally Registered WFG
marks or as the WFG marks.
9.
WFG has used the mark WFG (Registration No. 4,372,515) in commerce in
connection with title insurance services (among other services) since at least January 1, 2010.
WFG continues to use the mark WFG in commerce in connection with title insurance services
among other services.
10.
WFG has used the marks of Registration No. 4,379,546 and No. 4,376,455 (for
WFG has used the mark of Registration No. 4,376,456 (WFG TITLE
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 3
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 5 of 15
WFG continues to use this mark in commerce in connection with title insurance services among
other services.
12.
WFG has used, and continues to use, in commerce in connection with the sale of
its title insurance and other services, the following trade names (among others): WFG, WFG
Title, WFG Title Insurance. These trade names are sometimes collectively referred to herein
as WFGs trade names.
13.
WFG has used, and continues to use, the WFG marks and WFGs trade names on
its website, http://national.wfgnationaltitle.com, in connection with its sale and promotion of title
insurance services among other services.
14.
WFG has expended considerable time, effort, and money to promote the WFG
marks and WFGs trade names in connection with title insurance services among other services.
As a result of these efforts, and the substantial and continuous use of these marks and trade
names by WFG, consumers of such services in this District and elsewhere associate the WFG
marks and WFGs trade names with WFG.
15.
WFG has acquired valuable goodwill in connection with its services. This
goodwill is associated with the WFG marks and with WFGs trade names.
16.
Upon information and belief, using Googles AdWords program, Defendant has
caused the following advertisement to appear (the red oval has been added to aid the reader).
This advertisement is referred to herein as Defendants WFG Ad. (See also Ex. A.)
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 4
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
17.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 6 of 15
results when a consumer searching for WFGs title services enters the phrase wfg title into the
Google search box.
18.
phrase: WFG Title Insurance OldRepublicTitle.com. Below the hyperlinked phrase WFG
Title Insurance OldRepublicTitle.com, the ad lists the website www.oldrepublictitle.com/
and the statements Find the Right Title Insurance for you. Talk to a Representative! The
bottom line of Defendants WFG Ad includes the following four hyperlinks: The Company,
Careers, History and Strengths.
19.
Page 5
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
20.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 7 of 15
The screenshot below shows a portion of an Old Republic landing page that is
21.
The Old Republic landing page includes an advertisement for title insurance and a
form for requesting a custom quote. The form can be filled out and submitted online to an
Old Republic Title rep. The landing page prominently displays Defendants name, Old
Republic National Title Insurance Company, in the upper left corner.
22.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 6
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
23.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 8 of 15
Upon information and belief, Defendant owns, maintains and operates the website
WFGs mark WFG. The phrase WFG Title Insurance used in Defendants WFG Ad also
includes WFGs trade names WFG, WFG Title and WFG Title Insurance.
28.
OldRepublicTitle.com. This use juxtaposes WFGs trade name with Defendants website
www.oldrepublictitle.com. The positioning of WFGs trade name separated from Defendants
website by a hyphen creates the impression in the consumer viewing Defendants WFG Ad that
WFG and Defendant are affiliated, connected or otherwise associated, and/or that WFG sponsors
or approves of Defendants services.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 7
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
30.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 9 of 15
Defendants WFG Ad uses the phrase The Company as a hyperlink that directs
the consumer to a website promoting and marketing Defendants services. The use of The
Company, in singular form, under the title WFG Title Insurance OldRepublicTitle.com,
mistakenly suggests that WFG and Defendant are associated.
32.
WFG: namely, title insurance services. Defendants use of WFGs trade name and the WFG
mark in the ad is likely to cause confusion and mistake because the associated services are of the
same kind.
34.
WFG Ad targets the same class of consumers as WFG when using the WFG marks and WFGs
trade names. Defendants use of the ad is to market to the consumers interested in buying title
insurance services from WFG.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 8
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
35.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 10 of 15
Defendants use of WFGs trade names and the WFG mark in the ad is likely to
cause confusion, mistake, and/or deceptionincluding but not limited to initial confusion,
mistake and deceptionof consumers, potential consumers, and others as to the affiliation,
connection or association of WFG with Defendant, and infringes WFGs trade name and/or
WFGs mark.
36.
Consumers, potential consumers, and others are likely, at least initially, to believe
that Defendants website and associated services are sponsored by, or affiliated with, or
approved by, WFG.
37.
Upon information and belief, Defendants WFG Ad is, and has been, displayed to
consumers at least throughout the United States in response to a search for wfg title using the
Google search engine since at least as early as December 4, 2014.
38.
Defendant has had constructive notice of the registration of the WFG marks since
Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of WFGs trade
names, including at least WFG, WFG Title and WFG Title Insurance, at the time
Defendant adopted and began using the ad.
40.
Upon information and belief, Defendant does not have a federal trademark
registration for WFG, WFG Title, or WFG Title Insurance alone or in combination with
any other word or phrase.
41.
Defendants use of WFGs trade names and WFGs mark WFG or any
Upon information and belief, Defendant has profited from its wrongful acts.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 9
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
43.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 11 of 15
Upon information and belief, Defendant adopted and used WFGs mark and name
in commerce with the willful intent to trade off of WFGs goodwill and reputation by associating
Defendants website www.oldrepublictitle.com and Defendants title insurance services with
WFGs title insurance services to create a likelihood of consumer confusion in the marketplace.
44.
manner that would cause consumer confusion, mistake or deception as to the affiliation,
connection or association of WFG with Defendant, and/or as to the sponsorship or approval of
Defendants services by WFG. The WFG Ad author meant to use WFGs name and mark to
cause mistake and confusion so that Defendant would win customers from its competitor WFG.
COUNT I
Violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114
45.
46.
47.
The WFG marks listed above are distinctive and owned exclusively by WFG.
48.
Defendant has used and continues to use the mark WFG in the accused
advertisement in connection with the sale, offering for sale, and advertising of Defendants title
insurance services, which are identical or nearly identical to the services listed in WFGs Federal
Registration of the WFG mark.
49.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 10
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
50.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 12 of 15
Defendant has used and continues to use the phrase WFG Title Insurance in the
accused advertisement in connection with the sale, offering for sale, and advertising of
Defendants title insurance services, which are identical or nearly identical to the services listed
in WFGs Federal Registrations of the WFG marks.
53.
Defendants unauthorized use of the phrase WFG Title Insurance in the accused
Upon information and belief, Defendants activities are likely to damage WFGs
reputation and goodwill among consumers and to divert sales and opportunities away from WFG
and to Defendant.
57.
Upon information and belief, Defendants acts of infringement have caused and,
unless enjoined, will continue to cause WFG to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury in an
amount to be determined in this action.
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 11
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
58.
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 13 of 15
WFG is without an adequate remedy at law. Defendants use of the WFG marks
and/or any confusingly similar variation of the WFG marks has caused and/or is likely to cause
irreparable injury to WFG, and unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court, WFG will continue to
suffer irreparable injury.
COUNT II
Violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)
59.
60.
61.
The WFG marks listed above, and the trade names WFG, WFG Title, and
Defendant has used the trade name WFG and/or WFG Title and/or WFG
Title Insurance in connection with the sale of title insurance services, which are identical or
nearly identical to the services with which WFG has used the name.
63.
Defendant is not authorized to use WFGs trade name, marks or any confusingly
similar name or mark that implies that Defendant is in any way associated or affiliated with
WFG.
64.
Defendants use of WFG and/or WFG Title and/or WFG Title Insurance in
the accused advertisement is likely to confuse consumers into believing that the services offered
by Defendant originated from, are authorized by, or are somehow affiliated with WFG.
65.
Defendants use of the name WFG and/or WFG Title and/or WFG Title
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 12
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 14 of 15
likely to believe Defendants services in some way are connected with, sponsored by, licensed
by, affiliated with, or otherwise associated with WFG.
66.
Upon information and belief, Defendants use of the name WFG and/or WFG
Title and/or WFG Title Insurance was made with actual knowledge of WFGs rights in these
trade names.
67.
Upon information and belief, Defendants activities are likely to damage WFGs
reputation and goodwill among consumers and to divert sales and opportunities away from WFG
and to Defendant.
69.
Upon information and belief, Defendants acts of infringement have caused and,
unless enjoined, will continue to cause WFG to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury in an
amount to be determined in this action.
70.
name WFG and/or WFG Title and/or WFG Title Insurance has caused and/or is likely to
cause irreparable injury to WFG, and unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court, WFG will
continue to suffer irreparable injury.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC prays for the following relief:
A.
B.
persons in active concert or participation with it, enjoining it from using WFGs trade name,
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 13
Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR
Document 1
Filed 01/09/15
Page 15 of 15
mark or any confusingly similar variation of WFGs trade name or mark, in connection with title
insurance services;
C.
A judgment requiring Defendant to account for and pay to WFG all profits
wrongfully derived by Defendant through its unlawful acts set forth herein, together with interest
and costs;
E.
reasonable attorneys fees incurred in this action, together with interest, including prejudgment
interest, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117 and the equity powers of this Court; and
F.
Such other and further relief as may be deemed just and appropriate.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), Plaintiff requests a trial by jury on all issues properly
triable by a jury.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 9, 2015
By:
s/ Kristen L. Reichenbach
Robert T. Cruzen, OSB 080167
Email: rob.cruzen@klarquist.com
James E. Geringer, OSB 951783
Email: james.geringer@klarquist.com
Kristen L. Reichenbach, OSB 115858
Email: kristen.reichenbach@klarquist.com
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, Oregon 97204
Telephone: 503-595-5300
Facsimile: 503-595-5301
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Williston Financial Group LLC
COMPLAINT FOR
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Page 14